Geographic miss: a cause of treatment failure in radio-oncology applied to intracoronary radiation therapy

Intracoronary Brachytherapy After Stenting De Novo Lesions in Diabetic Patients

OBJECTIVES

We studied the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) after successful coronary stenting in diabetic patients with de novo lesions.

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary brachytherapy has proven effective in preventing recurrences in patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the role of ICB for the treatment of de novo coronary stenoses remains controversial.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients were randomized to either ICB or no radiation after stenting. Primary end points were in-stent mean neointimal area (primary end point of efficacy) and minimal luminal area of the entire vessel segment (primary end point of effectiveness), as assessed by intravascular ultrasound at six-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed at the target, injured, irradiated, and entire vessel segments.

RESULTS

At follow-up, the in-stent mean neointimal area was 52% smaller in the ICB group (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the minimal luminal area of the vessel segment (4.5 +/- 2.4 mm2 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm2). Restenosis rates increased progressively by the analyzed segment in the ICB group: target (7.1% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.07), injured (9.5% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), irradiated (14.3% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), and vessel segment (23.8% vs. 25.6%, p = NS). At one year, 1 cardiac death, 6 myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3 due to late stent thrombosis), and 10 target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) (6 due to the edge effect) occurred in the ICB group, whereas in the nonradiation group, there were 11 TVRs and no deaths or MIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary brachytherapy significantly inhibited in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in diabetic patients. However, clinically this was counteracted by the occurrence of the edge effect and late stent thrombosis.

Direct Stenting Versus Direct Stenting Followed by Centered Beta-Radiation With Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Dosimetry and Long-Term Anti-Platelet Treatment

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the efficacy of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) combined with stenting for the primary prevention of restenosis.

BACKGROUND

Intravascular brachytherapy after stent implantation for de novo lesions has been abandoned for the present. We revisited this procedure by optimizing all procedural steps-the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIa blockers, direct stenting, adequate radiation coverage, avoidance of edge damage, source centering, intravascular ultrasound-guided dosimetry, and continuation of a dual anti-platelet regimen for one year.

METHODS

The Beta-Radiation Investigation with Direct stenting and Galileo in Europe (BRIDGE) study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the long-term efficacy of VBT with P-32 (20 Gy at 1 mm in the coronary wall) after direct stenting. The primary end point was angiographic intra-stent late loss; secondary end points were six months binary restenosis and neo-intimal hyperplasia. Patients (n = 112) with de novo lesions (2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter up to 15 mm long) were randomized to either VBT or no-VBT.

RESULTS

At six months, intra-stent loss was 0.43 and 0.84 mm (p < 0.001) in the irradiated and control groups, respectively. Intra-stent neo-intimal volume was reduced from 36 mm3 to 10 mm3. However, in the irradiated group there were six late occlusions as well as eight restenoses outside the stented and peri-stented area at the fall-off dose edges of the irradiated area. Accordingly, the target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rates at one year in the VBT group (20.4% and 25.9%, respectively) were higher than in the control group (12.1% and 17.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the optimization of pre-, peri-, and post-procedural factors and despite the relative efficacy of the brachytherapy for the prevention of the intra-stent neo-intimal hyperplasia, the clinical outcome of the irradiated group was less favorable than that of the control group.

"Candy wrapper" effect after drug-eluting stent implantation: déjà vu or stumbling over the same stone again?

Encouraging results have been obtained with drug-eluting stents (DESs) to prevent restenosis following PCI. However, DESs are not immune from restenosis and we describe a case of "candy wrapper" effect, commonly observed with intracoronary brachytherapy (IBT). In this article, we review the common drawbacks of DES and IBT and their prevention.

Monte Carlo parametric study of stent impact on dose for catheter-based intravascular brachytherapy with 90Sr/90Y

The radiation treatment of catheter-based beta-emitter sources is being used to prevent restenosis following interventional coronary procedures. We present the results of a Monte Carlo calculation study to assess the dosimetric impact in the vessel tissue due to the presence of the stent. A catheter-based beta-emitter system is modeled using the Monte-Carlo code MCNP4B. Dose distributions are calculated in annular voxels (0.050 x 0.025 mm2 section) along the axis of a 40 mm. 90Sr/90Y source with and without the stent (at a distance of 1.5-3.0 mm from the longitudinal axis of the source). The main results include: (a) a clear difference between the local perturbation just behind the strut and a more general perturbation seen deeper into the vessel tissue; (b) the local perturbations disappears at a depth of 300-400 microm while the more general perturbation affects the tissue in its full thickness including the prescription point; (c) in the local perturbation the maximum impact is determined mainly by the material and the thickness of the strut while the spatial attenuation of this impact is defined mainly by the strut width; (d) in the general perturbation, the most important magnitude is the free-area ratio for the path of the electrons, being the material characteristics and strut thickness of secondary importance; (e) analytical expressions are presented to estimate the magnitude of this perturbation according to the complete characteristics of the expanded strut, i.e., thickness, free-area ratio, and material; and (f) a simple algorithm is presented for estimating the free-area ratio when this information is not available.

Quality assurance in intracoronary brachytherapy. Recommendations for determining the planning target length to avoid geographic miss

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A new method of assessing geographic miss (GM) in endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) is applied to evaluate the quality of intracoronary brachytherapy treatments, retrospectively. Based on the Vienna experience, recommendations for adequate safety margins are derived to avoid GM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Evaluation is done on 136 vessels of 128 consecutive patients treated between October 1999 and July 2001. The quality of EVBT is assessed using the concept and terminology of the EVA GEC ESTRO task group. Evaluation of GM and/or safety margin is performed by comparing the outermost interventions with the reference isodose length (RIL) of the applied delivering devices on recorded compact disk (CD) angiograms. The RIL is defined as the length of the vessel segment, which receives at least 90% of the reference dose at the reference depth (=1 mm within the vessel). GM is defined as injured vessel segments, which receive a dose lower than 90% of reference dose. Measurements of intervention length (IL) and active source length (ASL) are performed with respect to anatomical landmarks within the vessel in the region of interest (e.g. stent edges), and by using the nominal length of the devices (balloons, sources) as a reference scale. The edges of RIL are determined by subtracting the length of the dose-fall-off zone (specific to the applied delivery devices: (192)Ir 4.5 mm, (90)Sr 2.5 mm, (32)P 2.0 mm) from the edges of ASL.

RESULTS

The described method to assess GM is applicable to 128 vessels (94%). GM is found in 23% of proximal edges and 20% of distal edges. 95% of all GM are observed if the total margin (proximal+distal margin) between RIL and IL is shorter than 10.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

GM in intracoronary brachytherapy can be widely avoided by adding an appropriate safety margin to the IL (5-6 mm each edge in this study) in order to determine the necessary RIL for a treatment.

De Novo Femoropopliteal Stenoses: Endovascular Gamma Irradiation Following Angioplasty—Angiographic and Clinical Follow-up in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To assess and report the follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial on centered endovascular gamma irradiation performed after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for de novo femoropopliteal stenoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent PTA for de novo femoropopliteal stenoses were randomly assigned to undergo 14-Gy centered endovascular irradiation (irradiation group, n = 15) or no irradiation (control group, n = 15). Intraarterial angiography was performed 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment; duplex ultrasonography (US), the day before and after PTA and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months later. Treadmill tests and interviews were performed the day before PTA and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months later. Results of angiography, duplex US, treadmill tests, and interviews were evaluated with the nonpaired t or the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean absolute individual changes in degree of stenosis, compared with the degrees of stenosis shortly after PTA, in the irradiation group versus in the control group were -10.6% +/- 22.3 versus 39.6% +/- 24.6 (P <.001) at 6 months, -2.0% +/- 34.2 versus 40.6% +/- 32.6 (P =.002) at 12 months, and 7.4% +/- 43.2 versus 37.7% +/- 34.5 (P =.043) at 24 months. The rates of target lesion restenosis at 6 (P =.006) and 12 (P =.042) months were significantly lower in the irradiation group. The numbers of target lesion re-treatments were similar between the groups, but target vessel re-treatments were more frequent in the irradiation group. There were no significant differences in interview or treadmill test results between the two groups at t test analysis.

CONCLUSION

The degree of stenosis was significantly reduced 6, 12, and 24 months after angioplasty of de novo femoropopliteal stenoses in the patients who underwent endovascular irradiation.

Geographical miss during centered intracoronary beta-radiation with 90Yttrium: incidence and implications for recurrence rates after vascular brachytherapy for de novo lesions

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine the incidence and causes of geographical miss (GM) and evaluate its impact on edge restenosis after 'primary', centered, intracoronary beta-radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND

Edge restenosis is a limitation of intracoronary beta-radiation therapy. GM occurs when the radiation source does not fully cover the injured segment and may account for this phenomenon.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients enrolled in the Dose-Finding study were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomized to receive 9, 12, 15 or 18 Gy at 1 mm tissue depth. Using quantitative coronary angiography the effective irradiated segment (EIRS) and both edges were studied prior to and after intervention, and at six-month follow-up. GM was defined as a situation where the effective radiation source length (24 mm) did not fully cover the injured segment. The edges of the EIRS that were injured during the procedure constituted the GM edges. A greater than 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up was considered significant. GM was determined by the simultaneous, electrocardiographically matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons in place, in identical projections surrounded by contrast.

RESULTS

In 16% of patients GM was noninterpretable owing to inadequate filming. GM constituted 21.1% of the interpretable edges and 40.1% of the interpretable vessels analyzed. The occurrence of restenosis in the EIRS and the analyzed vessel segment (VS) was similar between procedures with and without GM. In vessels with GM, restenosis was significantly increased from the EIRS to the VS (from 8.77% to 21%, p = 0.05) as opposed to non-GM vessels (from 11.9% to 19%, p = 0.6). GM tended to be associated with a greater incidence of significant stenosis at the edges of the EIRS (8.3% versus 4.0%, p = 0.15) compared with individuals with >50 % stenosis but no GM. This effect was more prominent at the distal edge. The relation of GM and edge restenosis was independent of dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

Since GM does not affect the incidence of restenosis in the EIRS, restenosis in this segment should be considered a treatment failure, probably due to inadequate dosage. GM is related to significant increase in restenosis from the EIRS to the VS. GM tends to be associated with restenosis at the edges of the EIRS. This is a local phenomenon, which is independent of dosage and which has a specific pathophysiology (combination of injury and low-dose radiation). If GM can be eliminated, the results of vascular brachytherapy will be improved.

Optimal source position for irradiation of coronary bifurcations in endovascular brachytherapy with catheter based beta or iridium-192 sources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracoronary brachytherapy after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is usually performed with catheter-based treatment techniques in a straight vessel segment. There is a growing interest for treatment of bifurcations, which requires consecutive positioning of the source in main vessel and side branch.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-house developed software (IC-BT doseplan) is used to explore the optimal positioning of the source in modelled bifurcations with different shape for the source types available in our hospital, i.e. (90)Sr/(90)Y, (32)P and (192)Ir. The results were summarised in look-up tables. The usefulness of these look-up tables was tested on various clinical examples.

RESULTS

Tabulated results for the modelled bifurcations yield an estimation of the distance between the sources (gap width) in relation to the geometry and source type: (90)Sr/(90)Y gap range 3-8.5 mm, (32)P gap range 2-7 mm and (192)Ir gap range 3.5-8 mm. The average dose relative to 2 mm from the source axis is: (90)Sr/(90)Y, (mean+/-SD) 120+/-40%; (32)P, 125+/-50% and (192)Ir, 120+/-22%. The look-up tables also provide the coarse location and value of maximum and minimum dose: (90)Sr/(90)Y, 220-60%, (32)P, 230-55% and (192)Ir, 170-85%. It appeared that the look-up tables provide a good approximation of the optimal gap width in the clinical examples.

CONCLUSIONS

Tabulated optimal gap widths are very useful for quick estimation of the required gap width for a given bifurcation and source type, in case the prescribed dose in both vessels is the same. In unfavourable geometries there is a risk of local underdosage. Individual treatment planning using a program such as IC-BT doseplan is then recommended.

Predictors of 32P beta brachytherapy failure in patients with high-risk in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of coronary radiation therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has been established in several randomized clinical trials. The efficacy of this treatment in the general population is less well established.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We report our experience in 118 consecutive patients with nonselected high-risk ISR who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention and brachytherapy with (32)P beta-irradiation and who were prospectively enrolled in a quantitative angiographic and clinical follow-up protocol at 7 months after the index procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the independent predictor of angiographic restenosis after (32)P brachytherapy treatment.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 28.8% were diabetics. The mean lesion and mean radiated lengths were, respectively, 30.1 +/- 17.2 and 43.8 +/- 16.9 mm. The ISR pattern was diffuse in 96% of the treated lesions; in particular, 22.1% presented an occlusive pattern and 37.1% a proliferative pattern. At follow-up angiographic, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) rates were, respectively, 20.8% and 29.6%. The univariate predictors of angiographic restenosis were procedural geographic miss, pattern IV ISR, manual pullback maneuver of the radiation source, preprocedural lesion percentage stenosis and preprocedural lesion MLD. At logistic regression analysis, only geographic miss and pattern IV ISR were independent predictors of post intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) angiographic restenosis.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that 7-month angiographic restenosis after (32)P IRT in complex patients with ISR is not a frequent event and is predicted mainly by an occlusive lesion at baseline and by procedural geographical miss.

Treatment of In-Stent restenosis using a stent with non-polymer-based paclitaxel elution

Treatment of in-stent restenosis remains a therapeutic challenge. Twenty-seven lesions with in-stent restenosis were treated with non-polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents. At 6-month follow-up, in-stent late loss was 0.44 +/- 0.54 mm and the restenosis rate was 20%, indicating effective treatment for reduction of recurrent restenosis.

Intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to review the current literature pertaining to intracoronary brachytherapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR).

METHODS

English-language articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (January 1984 to January 2003) using the keywords brachytherapy, radioactive stents, and coronary arteries. In addition, pertinent reference citations from relevant articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Restenosis after PCR is a complex process, thought to be due to a combination of vessel wall remodeling and neointimal proliferation. To date, catheter-based delivery of intracoronary brachytherapy has been found to prevent vessel wall remodeling and causes a reduction in the proliferation of the neointima. Neointimal proliferation, as measured by mean neointimal area, was reduced in all animal studies (range 26%-91%). In contrast, animal studies examining radioactive stents demonstrated an increase in neointimal proliferation, suggesting that they may not be helpful at preventing post-PCR restenosis. All human studies using catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis have employed either beta (beta) or gamma (gamma) radiation sources with variable doses of radiation (range 7-56 Grays [Gy]). Restenosis occurred in 12% to 40% of patients in nonrandomized studies, and clinical events occurred in 13% to 50% of patients. To date, there have been 7 published randomized trials in humans comparing catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy to placebo, with a total of 1047 patients. The dose of radiation in the trials ranged from 14 Gy to 30 Gy. During follow-up, 8% to 33% of patients who received brachytherapy had restenosis versus 39% to 64% of patients receiving placebo. Clinical events occurred in 19% to 50% among patients who received brachytherapy versus 29% to 79% among patients receiving placebo. The majority of human studies examining radioactive stents do not demonstrate a reduction in restenosis in patients post-PCR. There are no randomized trials examining radioactive stents in humans.

CONCLUSION

Nonrandomized studies of radioactive stents suggest they are not effective at preventing in-stent restenosis. In contrast, data from animal and human studies suggest that catheter-based intracoronary brachytherapy can prevent in-stent restenosis and reduce clinical events post-PCR.

Intravascular brachytherapy: indications and management of adverse events

Intravascular brachytherapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis after repeat angioplasty. More than 5000 patients have been treated as part of various clinical trials. Based on the results of the GAMMA I trial, the START ((90)Sr Treatment of Angiographic Restenosis Trial), and the INHIBIT (INtimal Hyperplasia Inhibition with Beta In-stent restenosis Trial), the Checkmate system using (192)Ir, the Betacath system using (90)Sr/Y, and the Galileo system using (32)P, have been approved for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. With a better understanding and application of radiation oncology concepts to vascular brachytherapy, problems such as edge failure are being overcome. The complication of late thrombosis has also become less significant with the elimination of restenting at the brachytherapy procedure, and the prolonged use of antiplatelet therapy. There are other competing modalities in the early phases of clinical trials. The durability of results, lack of any significant long-term complications and the confirmation of the efficacy in other sites will further consolidate the role of radiation in treating in-stent restenosis.

Clinical outcomes for sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and vascular brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

The purpose of this study was to compare the mid-term clinical outcome of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation and vascular brachytherapy (VBT) for in-stent restenosis (ISR). We assessed the 9-month occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in 44 consecutive patients with ISR treated with SES implantation and 43 consecutive patients treated with VBT in the period immediately prior. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. During follow-up, three patients (7%) died in the VBT group and none in the SES group. The incidence of myocardial infarction was 2.3% in both groups. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 11.6% of the VBT patients and 16.3% of the SES patients (P = NS). The 9-month MACE-free survival was similar in both groups (79.1% VBT vs. 81.5% SES; P = 0.8 by log rank). The result of this nonrandomized study suggests that sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is at least as effective as vascular brachytherapy in the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

Three-Year Clinical Follow-up Results of Intracoronary Radiation Therapy Using a Rhenium-188-Diethylene-Triamine-Penta-Acetic-Acid-Filled Balloon System

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) prevents recurrent in-stent restenosis, but its long-term safety and efficacy remain uncertain. In the present study, the long-term clinical outcome of IRT using the rhenium-188 ((188)Re)-filled balloon system was evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After successful catheter-based treatment of either a de novo or restenotic lesion, 187 patients were randomly assigned to either the radiation (N=104) or the control (N=83) group. The (188)Re-filled balloon system was designed to deliver 17.6 Gy to 1.0-mm tissue depth. Angiographic restenosis was significantly reduced with IRT at 9 months (18.9% vs 45.9%, p<0.001), but the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR) by 3 years showed no difference. Lack of clinical benefit might be related to TVR caused by geographic miss (6/22, 28.6%), balloon-induced unhealed dissection (3/22, 13.6%) and late thrombosis (2/22, 9.1%). In the restenotic subgroup (N=39), the MACE rate within 3 years was significantly reduced with IRT (14.3% vs 54.5%, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

IRT using the (188)Re -filled balloon system is safe and technically feasible. Although IRT failed to show favorable outcomes for de novo lesion, the clinical benefits for restenotic lesions seem durable for 3 years. Furthermore, preventing geographic miss and dissection might improve long-term outcomes.

Real-world clinical practice of intracoronary radiation therapy as compared to investigational trials

Intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) is well established in clinical practice as an effective treatment for in-stent restenosis. We aimed to determine if the 6-month clinical outcome of patients treated postapproval for marketing [commercial radiation (CR)] is equivalent to those patients enrolled in the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trials [Gamma WRIST and Beta WRIST; investigational radiation (IR)]. The 6-month clinical outcome of 110 consecutive patients with 125 lesions who received IRT (gamma, (192)Ir, 15-18 Gy, n = 6; or beta, (32)P, 20 Gy, n = 20; or (90)Sr/Y, 18.4-23.0 Gy, n = 99) in CR was compared with the 6-month clinical outcome of 117 patients with 117 lesions who received IRT ((192)Ir, 15 Gy, n = 65, in Gamma WRIST; and (90)Y, 20.6 Gy, n = 52, in Beta WRIST) in IR. Patients in CR were treated with wider radiation margins. The CR received antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months and the IR for 1 month. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Use of atheroablation devices was less in CR than IR (15.2% vs. 32.8%, respectively; P = 0.001). The overall major adverse cardiac events (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization; 18.2% vs. 29.1% in IR; P = 0.05) were significantly lower in the CR when compared with patients in the IR. The real-world clinical practice of IRT demonstrates lower events and better clinical outcomes. This is most likely a result of implementation of the lessons learned from the clinical trials such as optimizing the dosimetry by using a higher dose, treating wider margins to minimize edge effect, and administering prolonged antiplatelet therapy to abolish late thrombosis.

Cutting balloon angioplasty vs. conventional balloon angioplasty in patients receiving intracoronary brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis prior to intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB). Cutting balloon angioplasty may reduce the incidence of uncontrolled dissection requiring adjunctive stenting and may limit "melon seeding" and geographic miss in patients with in-stent restenosis who are subsequently treated with ICB. We performed a retrospective case-control analysis of 134 consecutive patients with in-stent restenosis who were treated with ICB preceded by either CBA or conventional balloon angioplasty. We identified 44 patients who underwent CBA and ICB, and 90 control patients who underwent conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and ICB for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Adjunctive coronary stenting was performed in 13 patients (29.5%) in the CBA/ICB group and 41 patients (45.6%; P < 0.001) in the PTCA/ICB group. There was no difference in the injury length or active treatment (ICB) length. The procedural and angiographic success rates were similar in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, recurrent angina pectoris, subsequent target lumen revascularization, or the composite endpoint of all four clinical outcomes (P > 0.05). Despite sound theoretical reasons why CBA may be better than conventional balloon angioplasty for treatment of in-stent restenosis with ICB, and despite a reduction in the need for adjunctive coronary stenting, we were unable to identify differences in clinical outcome.

Comparison of the angiographic outcomes after beta versus gamma vascular brachytherapy for treatment of in-stent restenosis

This study was designed to compare the angiographic outcomes of beta versus gamma vascular brachytherapy (VBT). We reviewed the angiographic results of 636 lesions (212 that underwent beta and 212 that underwent gamma VBT, and 212 that received placebo) with native coronary in-stent restenosis matched for lesion length, vessel size, preprocedure minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and time to angiographic follow-up in the various randomized clinical trials and studies. Baseline lesion complexity was similar in these 3 groups. Final MLD was smaller in the beta VBT group than in the gamma VBT or placebo group. At follow-up, beta and gamma VBT significantly reduced both angiographic restenosis (34.4% for beta VBT, 26.4% for gamma VBT, and 50.9% in the placebo group; p <0.0001) and recurrent lesion length (9.2 mm for beta VBT, 8.4 mm for gamma VBT, and 15.5 mm placebo, p <0.0001) compared with placebo. Gamma VBT was associated with a greater reduction in restenosis outside the stent than beta VBT. By multivariable analysis, independent angiographic predictors of treated segment restenosis included beta or gamma VBT, lesion length, and vessel size. In matched lesions, beta and gamma VBT achieved similar reductions in treated segment restenosis and recurrent lesion length compared with placebo.

Acute and long-term outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty followed by gamma brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis lesions were divided into 2 groups according to the use of cutting balloon (n = 76) or conventional balloon angioplasty (n = 407) before gamma-brachytherapy. Cutting balloon angioplasty, compared with conventional balloon angioplasty, in patients undergoing gamma-brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis is associated with less requirement for new stents (11% vs 22%, p = 0.02) but similar target vessel revascularization (35.1% vs 29.8%, p = 0.4) at follow-up.

Vascular brachytherapy using a beta emitter source in diabetic patients with in-stent restenosis: angiographic and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

The management of diabetic patients with restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention remains a significant challenge. Diabetic patients remain at significant risk of restenosis despite stent implantation. This retrospective analysis was performed to determine the extent to which vascular brachytherapy improves late clinical and angiographic outcomes in diabetic patients compared to conventional therapy and compared to patients' nondiabetic counterparts.

METHODS

Pooled data from two studies (START [Stents and Radiation Trial] and START-40 trials) of patients (204 diabetic, 477 nondiabetic) receiving vascular brachytherapy (VBT) with a (90)Sr/(90)Y source after conventional percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent restenosis comprise the study population. The radiation delivery system used in both studies was the Beta-Cath system. The prescribed dose at 2 mm from the centerline of the source axis was 18.4 Gy or 23 Gy, depending on vessel diameter. The reference vessel diameter, minimal lumen diameter, and percent diameter stenosis were measured before the intervention, at the conclusion of the procedure, and at the 8-month follow-up examination. The Breslow-Day test was used to formally assess the similarity of treatment effect between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

RESULTS

Target lesion and target vessel revascularization rates and angiographic restenosis rates in diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with beta radiation or placebo were analyzed. Diabetic patients were more likely to have longer and more complex coronary lesions. In-hospital outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients were similar, irrespective of treatment status. At 8 months, patients treated with beta radiation exhibited less target lesion revascularization (diabetic: 10.9% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.02; nondiabetic: 12.8% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.007) and less target vessel revascularization (diabetic: 14.7% vs. 25.3%, p = 0.06; nondiabetic: 16.6% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.06) compared to placebo. In-stent binary angiographic restenosis was lower in irradiated patients (diabetic: 19.4% vs. 37.3% for placebo, p = 0.01; nondiabetic: 12.9% vs. 43% for placebo, p < 0.001). However, restenosis beyond the stent site reduced the impact of VBT, regardless of diabetic status. The magnitude of the treatment effect for target lesion and target vessel revascularization rates was similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously published institutional experiences have suggested that diabetic patients benefit from the use of VBT in the management of in-stent restenosis. This analysis now provides direct evidence to support the role of beta radiation VBT in this patient population. Diabetic patients undergoing this therapy are just as likely to benefit from it as their nondiabetic counterparts.

Catheter-based 32P beta-radiation after stent implantation in porcine coronary arteries: role of source-centering and geographical miss

The present study examined the role of source-centering and geographical miss in vascular brachytherapy. After implantation of 13 mm long stents, 38 coronary arteries in 13 pigs were randomly assigned to centered brachytherapy (n = 13), eccentric brachytherapy (n = 13), or no radiation (n = 12). Geographical miss was avoided by careful placement of a 27 mm (32)P beta-radiation source. Restenosis was quantified by angiography, histomorphometry, and intravascular ultrasound at 28 days. Source-centering led to a significant (P < 0.001) reduction of in-stent area stenosis (centered radiation, 12% +/- 5%; eccentric radiation, 37% +/- 21%; control arteries, 41% +/- 13%). Despite 7 mm coverage of the edge segments, radiation was found to induce edge stenosis due to neointima formation and constrictive vascular remodeling. We conclude that centered radiation was superior to eccentric radiation in reducing in-stent luminal narrowing while radiation-induced edge stenosis was still observed despite extension of the radiation zone to 7 mm beyond the stent edges.

GAF film dosimetry of a tandem positioned beta-emitting intravascular brachytherapy source train

Coronary artery brachytherapy may require treatment of lesions longer than a single source length. A treatment option is tandem positioning of the single source. This study presents relative dosimetric measurements of a cardiovascular brachytherapy source and the dosimetric characteristics in the junction region of tandem treatments. Measurements were carried out using a Novoste Beta Cath 90Sr/90Y 40 mm beta source in a plastic water phantom. Radiochromic MD-55-2 film, calibrated using both 6 MV photon and 6 MeV electron beams from a linear accelerator, was used as the dosimeter. Dose distributions around a single source and in the junction region of tandem irradiation were measured. Measurements of the near field dose as close as 1.2 mm from the source are presented. Significant over- or underdoses in the junction region of tandem irradiation were quantified. At a radial distance of 2 mm from the longitudinal axis of the source, the dose value in the middle of the junction region, normalized to the dose at 2 mm midline single source, was about 182% for a 2-seed overlap and 16% for a 2-seed gap, respectively. Dose distributions in the junction region as a function of source overlap and radial distance have fairly high gradients and exhibit characteristic patterns. The fraction of prescription dose was found to have a sigmoidal dependence on overlap size, for radial distances ranging between 1.2 and 3 mm. The parameters of these sigmoids, quantified as functions of radial distance, could be used to provide quick and reasonable over/underdose estimates, given any potential overlap or gap in the junction area, with an uncertainty within 10%.

Correlates of failure following treatment with Sr-90 beta irradiation for in-stent restenosis

We sought to determine the correlates of failure following intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) with Sr-90 using the Novoste Beta-Cath system for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in a broad range of patients. IRT has been shown to be more efficacious compared to placebo for the treatment of ISR in large randomized trials. However, even in patients treated with IRT, major adverse cardiac events occur in approximately 20% of cases on follow-up. This trial sought to elucidate the correlates of failure following successful IRT for ISR. To determine the correlates of IRT failure, we retrospectively compared the demographics, lesion characteristics, and clinical outcomes of 102 consecutive patients with ISR treated with Sr-90 from September 1998 to July 2001. IRT failure was defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization (TVR) due to repeat ISR on follow-up. A comparison of the clinical and angiographic profile of IRT failures (n = 16) vs. IRT successes (n = 86) revealed that a history of smoking (75% vs. 40%; P = 0.012), current use of calcium channel blockers (84% vs. 45%; P = 0.013), ostial location of target lesion (44% vs. 16%; P = 0.020), and mean posttreatment minimal luminal diameter (MLD; 1.64 +/- 0.19 vs. 2.21 +/- 0.29 mm; P < 0.001), respectively, were correlated with failure using univariate analysis. After multivariate regression analysis, the correlates of failure that remained significant were treatment of an ostial lesion (OR = 31.2; 95% CI = 2.6-382.7; P = 0.007) and final posttreatment MLD (P < 0.001). Ostial location of target lesion and smaller posttreatment MLD are correlated with subsequent death, MI, and TVR following therapy with Sr-90 for ISR.

Intravascular brachytherapy for native coronary ostial in-stent restenotic lesions

OBJECTIVES

We analyzed the effects of vascular brachytherapy (VBT) on ostial in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis has a high recurrence rate after percutaneous reintervention. The recurrence rate of ostial ISR lesions and the impact of VBT remain unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated 133 patients with native coronary ostial ISR from a pooled database of 990 patients enrolled in randomized VBT trials. Independent quantitative angiography was performed at baseline and follow-up in 45 gamma, 27 beta, and 61 placebo patients.

RESULTS

Binary restenosis was significantly higher in placebo than radiated patients (75.4% vs. 17.8% in gamma vs. 22.2% in beta, p < 0.0001). The treatment effect of both gamma (odds ratio [OR] 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02 to 0.17) and beta VBT (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.31) was maintained after controlling for differences in baseline lesion length. Proximal and distal radiation edge restenosis rates were similar among the groups. Vascular brachytherapy of true aorto-ostial lesions (n = 34) was similarly beneficial: restenosis rates of placebo versus gamma or beta patients of 83.3% versus 6.7% versus 28.6%, p = 0.0002.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional treatment of ostial ISR is associated with a recurrence rate of over 75%. Vascular brachytherapy with either gamma or beta sources results in significant and similar reductions in restenosis compared with placebo. Similar benefits after VBT prevail in true aorto-ostial lesions.

Use of rapamycin-impregnated stents in coronary arteries

FIM STUDY: We investigated the 2-year safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents. Thirty patients had a single 18-mm sirolimus-eluting coronary stent implanted. Twenty-eight patients underwent angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up at 2 years. No death occurred during the study period. No patient developed in-stent restenosis. One patient had a 52% in-lesion stenosis that required repeated revascularization and another patient underwent target vessel revascularization. Neointimal hyperplasia volume was minimal at 2 years in both groups. This study demonstrates the 2-year safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stenting. The slow release formulation showed slight superiority over the fast-release formulation in preventing late lumen loss, which was minimal in both groups.

RAVEL TRIAL

This-study was a randomized, double-blind study that included 238 patients at 19 medical centers (15 in Europe, 3 in Brazil, and 1 in Mexico). Patients were eligible for the study if they were between 18 and 85 years of age, and had been given a diagnosis of stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia. Additional eligibility criteria were presence of a single primary target lesion in a native coronary artery that was 2.5 to 3.5 mm in diameter and that could be covered by an 18-mm stent stenosis of 51% to 99% of the luminal diameter and a flow rate of grade 1 or higher according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive the sirolimus-eluting stent, and 118 were assigned to receive the standard stent. At 6 months, the degree of neointimal proliferation, manifested as the mean (+/-SD) late luminal loss, was significantly lower in the sirolimus-stent group (-0.01 +/- 0.33 mm) than in the standard-stent group (0.80 +/- 0.53 mm, P <.001). None of the patients in the sirolimus-stent group, as compared with 26.6% of those in the standard-stent group, had restenosis of >/=50% of the luminal diameter (P <.001). There were no episodes of stent thrombosis. During a follow-up period of up to 1 year, the overall rate of major cardiac events was 5.8% in the sirolimus-stent group and 28.8% in the standard-stent group (P <.001). The difference was due entirely to the higher rate of revascularization of the target vessel in the standard-stent group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with angina who received sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of single, primary lesions in native coronary arteries had no angiographic evidence of late luminal loss or in-stent restenosis at 6 months, no episodes of thrombosis, and a very low rate of cardiac events at 1 year.

A morphological–mechanical explanation of edge restenosis in lesions treated with vascular brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Edge restenosis in stenotic lesions treated by implantation of a conventional stent followed (or preceded) by a catheter-based brachytherapy is often attributed to "geographic miss" (GM). We propose a complementary (or, possibly, alternative) explanation based on the concept that a clear postprocedural mismatch between the in-stent lumen and the normal (undilated) lumens of the proximal and/or distal vessel segments results in an excessive, damageable increase of axial wall stress in these segments.

METHODS

The possible poststenting situations at both margins of a stent are examined, and based on the presence or absence of an increase in axial wall stress, predictions are made about the lesion evolution. The concept is then also examined in the light of published observations.

RESULTS

None of the analyzed observations appeared to be incompatible with the proposed morphological-mechanical explanation.

CONCLUSION

From a mechanical point of view, optimal matching of the proximal and distal stent diameters to the corresponding normal diameters of the adjacent arterial segment is likely to reduce the rate of edge restenosis.

Endovascular brachytherapy after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of recurrent femoropopliteal obstructions

PURPOSE

To test the preventive effect of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) on restenosis following secondary angioplasty in patients with presumed neointimal restenosis in the femoropopliteal segment.

METHODS

From March 1997 through May 2000, 100 patients (58 men; mean age 70 years, range 45-87) with postangioplasty femoropopliteal segment restenoses were enrolled and randomized to treatment with repeat angioplasty and EVBT (n=51) or to angioplasty alone (n=49) as control. The groups were similar with regard to demographics and lesion characteristics. High-dose-rate EVBT was performed with (192)Ir irradiation without a centering device (12 Gy for a reference vessel radius of 3 mm and a 2-mm reference depth). Primary endpoint in the 1-year follow-up was recurrent obstruction >50% documented by duplex ultrasound; the secondary endpoint was clinical improvement.

RESULTS

Only 44 (86%) of 51 patients received adequate EVBT due to technical failure, so the 7 failures were included with the controls in the per-protocol adherence analysis. At 1 year, the patients receiving EVBT had a restenosis rate of 23% (10/44), which differed significantly (p<0.028) from the 42% (23/56) rate in controls. Clinical results tended to be better with EVBT, but differences did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

EVBT without a centering device reduced restenosis significantly in patients with recurrent stenosis after angioplasty, which confirms previous results in primary long-segment femoropopliteal obstructions.

Reno, a European postmarket surveillance registry, confirms effectiveness of coronary brachytherapy in routine clinical practice

PURPOSE

To assess, by a European registry trial, the clinical event rate in patients with discrete stenotic lesions of coronary arteries (de novo or restenotic) in single or multiple vessels (native or bypass grafts) treated with beta-radiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 1999 and September 2000, 1098 consecutive patients treated in 46 centers in Europe and the Middle East with the Novoste Beta-Cath System were included in Registry Novoste (RENO).

RESULTS

Six-month follow-up data were obtained for 1085 patients. Of 1174 target lesions, 94.1% were located in native vessels and 5.9% in a bypass graft; 17.7% were de novo lesions, 4.1% were restenotic, and 77.7% were in-stent restenotic lesions. Intravascular brachytherapy was technically successful in 95.9% of lesions. Multisegmental irradiation, using a manual pullback stepping maneuver to treat longer lesions, was used in 16.3% of the procedures. The in-hospital rate of major adverse cardiac events was 1.8%. At 6 months, the rate was 18.7%. Angiographic follow-up was available for 70.4% of the patients. Nonocclusive restenosis was seen in 18.8% and total occlusion in 5.7% of patients. A combined end point for late (30-180 days) definitive or suspected target vessel closure was reached in 5.4%, but with only 2% of clinical events. Multivariate analysis was performed for major adverse cardiac events and late thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Data obtained from the multicenter RENO registry study, derived from a large cohort of unselected consecutive patients, suggest that the good results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials can be replicated in routine clinical practice.

[Brachytherapy for coronary restenosis: state of art in 2003]

Based on therapeutic approach for benign diseases, vascular brachytherapy decreases smooth vascular muscle cells proliferation and multiplication which lead to the formation of the neo-intima. The radioactive positive action affects arterial recoil due to post angioplasty vessel injury. Randomised studies has shown good angiographic results up to 6 months of follow-up, with 50% in-stent restenosis rate decrease and on the analysed segment as well. Decrease on Mace and TLR show statistically significance. Results don't correlate with emitter and bêta emitters had been introduced in France recently. Vascular brachytherapy is actually indicated for in-stent restenosis, there is no evidence to perform this treatment for de novo lesion. Geographic miss, source centering, late thrombosis and pullback procedure may interfere with treatment quality. IVUS allows best target volume determination to a higher quality level. Internationals guidelines such as Eva-Gec-Estro recommendations could increase treatment safety and enable development of an optimal technique.

Sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis: the first clinical experience

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we assess the value of sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with complex in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

The treatment of ISR remains a therapeutic challenge, since many pharmacological and mechanical approaches have shown disappointing results. The SESs have been reported to be effective in de-novo coronary lesions.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with severe, recurrent ISR in a native coronary artery (average lesion length 18.4 mm) and objective evidence of ischemia were included. They received one or more 18 mm Bx VELOCITY SESs (Cordis Waterloo, Belgium). Quantitative angiographic and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was performed at four months, and clinical follow-up at nine months.

RESULTS

The SES implantation (n = 26) was successful in all 16 patients. Four patients had recurrent restenosis following brachytherapy, and three patients had totally occluded vessels preprocedure. At four months follow-up, one patient had died and three patients had angiographic evidence of restenosis (one in-stent and two in-lesion). In-stent late lumen loss averaged 0.21 mm and the volume obstruction of the stent by IVUS was 1.1%. At nine months clinical follow-up, three patients had experienced four major adverse cardiac events (two deaths and one acute myocardial infarction necessitating repeat target vessel angioplasty).

CONCLUSIONS

The SES implantation in patients with severe ISR lesions effectively prevents neointima formation and recurrent restenosis at four months angiographic follow-up.

Skin dose and dose-area product values in patients undergoing intracoronary brachytherapy

Entrance skin doses, dose-area product (DAP) values, fluoroscopy times and digital cine acquisition data were measured for 86 patients undergoing intracoronary brachytherapy procedures with beta sources, to estimate risk of skin injuries. Interventions were carried out in three dedicated X-ray interventional cardiology rooms equipped with X-ray systems operating in pulsed modes, with high filtration and edge filter options. Skin dose distribution was analysed in detail in 56 patients using slow films and thermoluminescent dosimetry. Digital recording of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine cine images also allowed analysis of the technical parameters used throughout the procedures. A protocol for clinical follow-up of these patients at the cardiology service is also presented, which prescribes special attention when a threshold dose is reached. Median values for DAP, fluoroscopy time and number of frames were 81.2 Gy cm(2), 17.5 min and 1569 frames, respectively, and maximum values were 323.3 Gy cm(2), 46.2 min and 3213 frames, respectively. In two cases, maximum skin doses in a procedure reached 3.5 Gy and 4.6 Gy. Comparing median values in this study, intracoronary brachytherapy involved approximately two-fold the DAP used in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures performed during the same period in the same catheterization laboratories, as a consequence of the need to monitor the radioactive source location used for the treatment of stenoses and the intravascular ultrasound. Special care must be paid in those cases of high dose in relation to potential patient skin injuries and late effects.

Improved outcome with novel device for low-pressure PTCA in de novo and in-stent lesions

PURPOSE

Complex lesion morphology requiring the use of high pressure to effect lumen expansion and in-stent restenosis (ISR) remain two indications that challenge conventional PTCA balloons. We report on a new PTCA device that is designed to provide precise, low-pressure dilatation of both de novo and in-stent lesions.

METHODS

The FX miniRAIL catheter (FX) has an integral wire positioned external to a dilating balloon and a short, 12-mm guidewire lumen distal to the balloon. The balloon inflates against the guidewire and the external wire to prevent slippage and to introduce high focal longitudinal stresses at low inflation pressures. In this initial study, the FX was used in 37 lesions (25 de novo, 12 in-stent; vessel reference diameter=2.73+/-0.49 mm) in 30 patients. A stepwise inflation protocol and QCA were used to determine the balloon pressure at which the stenosis was resolved (stenosis resolution pressure, SRP).

RESULTS

All lesions (100%) were easily reached, crossed and dilated without complication. The SRP was 4.5+/-2.9 atm, and no balloon slippage was observed. Residual stenosis after FX was 26.39+/-13.29%. Minor dissections (Types A and B) were observed in eight lesions (21.6%). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at follow-up (8.1+/-1.5 months) were 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The design of the FX is versatile and appears to provide for a safe, effective and improved low-pressure PTCA technique in de novo and in-stent lesions.

Predictors of late cardiac events following treatment with Sr-90 beta-irradiation for instent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) with Sr-90 using the Novoste Beta-Cath system has been shown to be an effective therapy for instent restenosis (ISR), but the temporal occurrence of cardiac events and the predictors of late complications require further investigation.

METHODS

We analyzed the demographics, lesion characteristics and clinical outcomes of 138 consecutive patients with ISR treated with IRT from September 1998 to March 2002. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularization (TVR). Characteristics of early (< or =8 months) and late (>8 months) failures were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (23.1%) of 138 patients had MACE on follow-up; 25% (8/32) of failures occurred late after treatment with IRT. A comparison of the clinical and angiographic profile of early and late failures using univariate analysis indicates no correlations to late failure following IRT. Duration to failure after IRT was 14.25+/-3.69 months in the late group compared to 4.63+/-2.86 months in the early group (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Late MACE after IRT with Sr-90 for ISR occur beyond the traditional period for clinical restenosis in 25% of cases and are difficult to predict. Further study is warranted to identify patients at risk for the development of late complications after IRT.

Efficacy and feasibility of helixcision for debulking neointimal hyperplasia for in-stent restenosis

The Helixcision system is a novel 6 Fr-compatible catheter designed to debulk tissue for in-stent restenosis lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and feasibility of this new system for removing neointimal hyperplasia. A total of 32 in-stent restenosis lesions in 32 patients were treated with helixcision followed by balloon angioplasty. Debulking efficacy was assessed with serial baseline intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in a subset of 18 lesions. To investigate longitudinal efficacy, 3D analysis was also performed in 12 lesions with automated pullback to calculate average cross-sectional areas across the stent. Prior to procedure, the angiographic reference diameter was 2.60 +/- 0.46 mm. Immediately after procedure, minimum lumen diameter improved from 0.84 +/- 0.33 to 2.19 +/- 0.41 mm (P < 0.0001). IVUS showed a significant reduction of intimal area (IA) after helixcision (from 4.95 +/- 2.04 to 2.88 +/- 1.48 mm(2); P < 0.001). Adjunctive balloon angioplasty further improved lumen area (LA) mainly by stent expansion rather than IA reduction at the site of minimum lumen area. The degrees of IA reduction and LA improvement were closely similar in volumetric analysis. Thirty-day and 6-month clinical follow-up were available in 97% (n = 31) and 72% (n = 23) of the enrolled patients, respectively. At 30-day follow-up, no major adverse cardiac event was reported except for periprocedural CK elevation in two patients (6%). Target legion revascularization within 6 months was performed in six patients (26%). Preliminary results of helixcision indicate that this system is safe and feasible for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The concordant results between 2D and 3D IVUS analyses suggest that this unique technology can achieve uniform longitudinal debulking throughout the stent. The long-term outcomes appeared to be favorable, considering the relatively diffuse lesion morphology.

Balloon-based radiation therapy for treatment of in-stent restenosis in human coronary arteries: results from the BRITE I study

Catheter-based intracoronary radiation therapy demonstrated reduction of the recurrence rate of in-stent restenosis by 35%-50% when compared to conventional therapy. The objectives of this study were to determine the safety and feasibility of a new balloon-shaped source design and a higher applied dose to reduce the restenosis rates. Thirty-two patients with in-stent restenosis who met study eligibility criteria were successfully treated with standard PCI techniques. Following a successful intervention, a P-32 beta-balloon source was positioned to cover the angioplasty site and a dose of a 20 Gy at 1 mm from the surface of the source was administered. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (any death, MI, emergent CABG, or repeat target vessel revascularization) during 6 months of follow-up. At 6 months, only one patient underwent repeat PTCA to the target vessel (3%). There were no instances of death, emergency surgery, late thrombosis, total occlusions, or MI. Binary restenosis measured by QCA at the stented segment was 0% and for the whole analysis vessel was 7.5%. Beta-radiation delivered with a balloon P-32 source design for patients with in-stent restenosis results in lower than expected rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis and the absence of late complications.

Geographical miss during intracoronary irradiation: impact on restenosis and determination of required safety margin length

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence and effects of underdosage of injured segments during intracoronary irradiation and to define the minimal length of safety margin required to avoid mismatched source placement.

BACKGROUND

Underdosage of injured segments due to misplacement of active source has been suggested as the underlying mechanism for the occurrence of edge restenosis.

METHODS

Baseline angiograms of 112 vessels in 109 patients with in-stent restenosis undergoing coronary reintervention followed by intracoronary irradiation ((192)Ir: Checkmate, Cordis, Miami, Florida; (32)P: Gallileo, Guidant, Houston, Texas; (90)Sr/Y: Beta-Cath, Novoste, Norcross, Georgia) were analyzed. The distances between the outermost injury and outermost end of "reference isodose length" (RIL), defined as a segment with >/=90% of reference dose at 1 mm vessel wall depth, were measured. "Safety margin" was defined as the distance between the outermost injury and outermost end of the RIL, "geographical miss" (GM) as a complete injured segment not being covered by the RIL, and "restenosis" as the percent diameter stenosis >50%.

RESULTS

Baseline angiographic analysis was performed for 224 edges in 112 vessels. Geographical miss was found in 46 (20.6%) edges. The incidence of target lesion restenosis within the 78 vessels with available follow-up was 43.3% for patients with GM versus 14.9% for patients with no GM (p = 0.005). Analysis of various injured segments exposed highest restenosis rates in injured segments with negligible irradiation (27.8%) in comparison with injured segments with dose fall-off (16.7%) or injured segments with full-dose irradiation (7.7%) (p = 0.006). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed a safety margin of 10 mm required per vessel (i.e., 5-mm safety margin/edge) to achieve 95% specificity of GM.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographical miss is associated with a higher incidence of restenosis at the corresponding edges. Restenosis was more pronounced in injured segments with negligible irradiation than in injured segments at the dose fall-off zones. We recommend a safety margin of 10 mm per vessel to minimize GM.

Endovascular gamma irradiation of femoropopliteal de novo stenoses immediately after PTA: interim results of prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To report an interim analysis of whether centered endovascular irradiation with the iridium 192 ((192)Ir) source immediately after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of de novo femoropopliteal stenoses lowers the restenosis rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing PTA to treat femoropopliteal stenoses were randomized for prophylaxis against restenosis with centered endovascular irradiation with a (192)Ir source (a dose of 14 Gy 2 mm deep to the vessel wall, irradiation group) or no irradiation (control group). Angiographic follow-up was available for 22 patients at 6 months (irradiation group, n = 10) and 12 patients at 12 months (irradiation group, n = 6). Duplex sonography, treadmill testing, and interviews were performed the day before and the day after PTA and after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results of angiography, duplex sonography, treadmill testing, and interviews were evaluated with a t test and multivariate analysis of variance (clinical characteristics, chi(2) test).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Interim analysis of the 6-month follow-up data revealed a trend toward a significantly lower restenosis rate in the irradiation group. The change in the degree of stenosis compared with that after PTA was -14.7% +/- 20.8 (mean +/- SD) in the irradiation group versus 37.7% +/- 27.3 in the control group (P =.001) and became even more marked at 12 months (-9.5% +/- 34.5 vs 45.5% +/- 40.7 [P =.03], respectively). The follow-up results of treadmill testing and interviews showed a nonsignificant benefit for the irradiation group. One thromboembolic complication occurred during irradiation. No side effects were observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular irradiation with a centered (192)Ir source immediately after PTA of de novo femoropopliteal stenoses reduces the restenosis rate.

Geographical miss and restenosis during catheter-based intracoronary beta-radiation for de novo lesions

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the impact of geographical miss (GM) on restenosis rates after intracoronary beta-radiation therapy for de novo lesions.

BACKGROUND

GM is the situation in which injured vessel segments (VSs) are receiving low-dose radiation and is accounted for edge restenosis. Its impact on the overall restenosis rates remains to be determined.

METHODS

We analyzed 330 patients (356 vessels) treated according to the Beta Radiation in Europe (BRIE) and the Dose Finding study protocols. Using quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the effective irradiated segment (EIRS), its edges and the total VS were analysed. The edges of the EIRS that were injured constituted the GM edges. Restenosis was defined as diameter stenosis > 50% at follow-up. GM was determined by the simultaneous electrocardiographic-matched, side-by-side projection of the source and balloons deflated and surrounded by contrast, at the site of injury, in identical angiographic projections.

RESULTS

In 20.5% of the vessels, GM was non-interpretable due to inadequate filming. GM occurred at 30.4% of the interpretable edges and 53% of the interpretable vessels that were analysed. Edge restenosis was significantly increased in the GM compared to non-GM edges (13.16% vs. 4.17%, respectively, P = .001), both in the proximal (P = .03) and the distal (P = .001) edges. GM associated with stent injury significantly increased edge restenosis (P = .006). GM related to balloon injury tended to be associated with increment in edge restenosis (P = .07). The restenosis in the EIRS was similar between vessels with and without GM (17.78% and 14.85%, respectively, P = .6). GM was associated with significant increment in the restenosis at the analyzed VS (31.85% vs. 21.48%, P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

GM is strongly associated with edges and restenosis in the analysed VS. GM does not increase restenosis in the EIRS.

Visual assessment of procedural results following treatment with Sr-90 beta-radiation for instent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Visual assessment (VA) of postprocedural % diameter stenosis (DS) is used routinely in clinical practice to determine the adequacy of coronary intervention. Although VA has been shown to underestimate final %DS after balloon angioplasty compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), the impact of this effect on clinical outcomes following treatment with intracoronary radiation therapy (IRT) with Sr-90 for instent restenosis (ISR) is unknown.

METHODS

To determine the effect of VA on the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after IRT for ISR, we compared the clinical outcomes of 102 consecutive patients based on postprocedural %DS by QCA vs. %DS by VA. MACE was defined as death, M1 or need for target vessel revascularization (TVR).

RESULTS

MACE rates for the 102 consecutive patients grouped according to postprocedural %DS by QCA and VA were compared. The mean %DS by QCA was 30.7%, while the mean %DS by VA was 12.5%. The mean %DS by VA across the QCA subgroups were 13.67%, 10.71% and 13.37%, respectively (P = .244). Fifty-two patients (51.0%) had %DS > 30% by QCA with the highest MACE percentage occurring in this subgroup.

CONCLUSION

VA underestimated the %DS compared to QCA, and it was associated with worse MACE following treatment with Sr-90 for ISR.

Intracoronary brachytherapy

Patients presenting with in-stent restenosis have an increased risk of need for repeat intervention. Intracoronary brachytherapy is indicated for these patients to prevent recurrent in-stent restenosis. Three intravascular brachytherapy systems are currently FDA-approved for use in patients: one utilizing gamma-radiation (Cordis) and two using beta-radiation (Novoste and Guidant). Current evidence and labeling do not support using intracoronary brachytherapy for prevention of restenosis in de novo lesions. Brachytherapy is absolutely contraindicated in patients unable to take prolonged combination antiplatelet drugs. Aspirin and a thienopyridine should be taken for 6 months if no new stent is placed and 12 months if a new stent is placed. If possible, new stent implementation should be avoided.

Monte Carlo dosimetry of a tandem positioned beta-emitting intravascular brachytherapy source train

Prevention of restenosis following interventional coronary procedures with catheter based beta-emitting sources is currently under clinical trial investigations. Systems utilizing fixed length source trains limit the clinician's ability to increase the radiation source length as required. A technique known as "pull back" is used when the segment of artery requiring radiation is longer than the available fixed length source train. In this instance, tandem positioning of the fixed length source is used to treat the longer length of artery. The aim of this study was to examine the dosimetry of the junction region associated with pull back treatments using a commercially available 90Sr/Y catheter based intravascular brachytherapy source train. Dose profiles were calculated, using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B, at radial distances of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm for pull back techniques using 2.5 mm overlapping, abutting, and 2.5 mm spaced source trains. Results at the protocol prescription radius of 2 mm showed a junction dose elevated 61% above prescription for 2.5 mm overlapping source trains. For 2.5 mm spaced trains, this figure falls to 64% below prescription dose. In contrast, abutted source trains exhibited only a 1% depression below prescription dose in the junction region. The reference point dose rate per unit activity of this source was found to be consistent with previous studies.

Inaccuracy in manual multisegmental irradiation in coronary arteries

PURPOSE

Retrospective evaluation of the accuracy of manual multisegmental irradiation with a source train for irradiation of long (re)stenotic lesions in coronary arteries, following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients were treated with intracoronary irradiation following PTCA with manual multisegmental irradiation. These patients were included in the multicenter, multinational 'European Surveillance Registry with the Novoste Beta-Cath system' (RENO). In all 36 patients the target length (i.e. PTCA length plus 5-mm margin at each side) was too long for the available source train lengths (30 and 40 mm). In 33 patients the radiation delivery catheter was manually positioned twice and in three patients three times in series, trying to avoid any gap or overlap. The total number of junctions was 39. Following a successful PTCA procedure the site of angioplasty was irradiated using the Novoste Beta-Cath afterloader with a 5-F non-centered catheter which accommodates the sealed beta-emitting (90)Sr/(90)Y source train or dummy source train. Radiation was delivered first to the distal part of the target length. Fluoroscopic images of this source position were stored in the computer memory. For irradiation of the proximal part of the target length, the delivery catheter had to be retracted over a distance equal to the source length used for the distal part. This was done by a continuous overlay video loop with ECG-gated replay of the image stored in the computer memory. The dummy source was used to position the delivery catheter so that the junction between both source positions was as precise as possible. Measurements of gap or overlap between the source positions were performed retrospectively on printed images. Doses were calculated, in accordance with the Novoste study protocol, at a distance of 2 mm from the source axis (=dose prescription distance) in several points along the irradiated length.

RESULTS

Interventional or PTCA length varied between 33 and 95 mm. The lesion sites were in the left anterior descending artery, (n=6), right coronary artery (n=20), left circumflex artery (n=6) and one vein graft. The administered radiation dose was determined by the vessel diameter and the presence of a stent. This dose, prescribed at a distance of 2 mm from the source axis, varied between 16 and 22 Gy. No gap or overlap was seen between the two source trains in only two out of 39 cases. In 16 cases there was a gap ranging between 0.6 and 9.6 mm and 18 cases showed an overlap of 0.5-14.4 mm. In three patients the measurement was not possible. In case of a gap the minimal dose calculated at 2 mm from the source axis varies between 0 and 87% of the prescribed dose, depending on the distance between both sources. In case of overlap the maximal dose varies between 110 and 200% of the prescribed dose at 2 mm from the source axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show the inaccuracy of manual multisegmental irradiation using a source train in coronary arteries, causing unacceptable dose inhomogeneities at a distance of 2 mm from the source axis at the junction between both source positions. Moreover, a perfect junction will never be possible due to movement of the non-centered radiation delivery catheter in the vessel lumen, as applied in this study. Manual multisegmental irradiation is therefore not recommended. Using longer line sources or source trains or preferably an automated stepping source is a more reliable and safer technique for treatment of long lesions.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes after use of 90Strontium/90Yttrium beta radiation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: results from the Stents and Radiation Therapy 40 (START 40) registry

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 40-mm 90Strontium/90Yttrium source train in the management of in-stent restenosis within native coronary arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter, prospective registry was designed to compare the results of patients with in-stent restenosis treated with a 40-mm source train to the placebo arm of the previously reported randomized Stents and Radiation Trial (START). All patients entered in the registry were treated with repeat balloon angioplasty followed by intravascular brachytherapy. Radiation dose was prescribed based on vessel size. 18 Gy was delivered at 2 mm for vessel diameters between 2.75 and 3.35 mm, and 23 Gy was used for vessels between 3.36 and 4.0 mm. The efficacy endpoints for the START 40 registry included a reduction in the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, target vessel revascularization rates, and target vessel failure (TVF) at 8 months. Secondary angiographic efficacy endpoints were binary restenosis at 8 months, in-stent minimum luminal diameter (MLD), and late loss. The safety endpoints included major adverse cardiac events as well as late aneurysm formation. The registry was designed to allow a statistically valid comparison of these results to the placebo group of the START 30 trial. Quantitative angiographic analysis was performed on the 8-month follow-up examination. Rates of restenosis were evaluated for various segments of the treated vessel. A separate analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between vessel injury length and the radiated segment.

RESULTS

A total of 207 patients were entered into the START 40 registry. The postprocedure angiographic results, including the postprocedure MLD and percent diameter stenosis, were similar between the START 40 patients and the placebo group from the START trial in the stented segment of the treated vessel. Eight-month angiographic follow-up was available on 150 patients from the registry. The TLR rate was significantly reduced when compared to the placebo group (11% vs. 22.4% respectively, p = 0.008). A similar reduction was seen in terms of target vessel revascularization (15.9% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.03). The 8-month MLD was found to be significantly larger in the START 40 patients (1.85 mm vs. 1.47 mm, p < 0.0001). The difference seen in the clinical endpoint of TVF (19.3% vs. 25.9%) did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). Analysis of the procedural angiograms revealed mismatch between the length of vessel injured and the location of the 90% isodose in 46% of the treated cases. Angiographic analysis revealed that geographic miss was associated with a higher rate of binary restenosis (32% vs. 18% p = 0.04) in the analysis segment.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter registry demonstrates the safety and efficacy of a 40-mm 90Strontium/90Yttrium source train in the management of patients with in-stent restenosis. Restenosis rates were lowered with the use of this longer source train when compared to the placebo arm of the START trial for lesions with a maximum vessel injury length of 20 mm. Angiographic analysis identified the importance of the accurate delineation of injury length and correct source positioning. These results support the continued use of beta radiation for the treatment of this disease process.

Impact of geographic miss on adjacent coronary artery segments in diffuse in-stent restenosis with beta-radiation therapy: angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analysis

BACKGROUND

The impacts of geographic miss on edge restenosis have not been sufficiently evaluated.

METHODS

Beta-radiation therapy with rhenium 188-filled balloon after rotational atherectomy for diffuse in-stent restenosis was performed in 50 patients. We evaluated the impacts of geographic miss on adjacent coronary artery segments beyond the stent by angiographic (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis in 50 irradiated lesions and 100 edges. Serial IVUS and QCA comparisons between postradiation and 6 months' follow-up were available in 44 and 47 of 50 patients, respectively. QCA measurements of minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and IVUS analysis were performed in the reference and radiation segments. Edges that were touched by the angioplasty balloon but were not adequately covered by radiation constituted the geographic miss edges.

RESULTS

Geographic miss was observed in 55.6% and 52.6% in QCA and IVUS analysis, respectively. Edge restenosis after radiation therapy in 3 patients was associated with geographic miss. In contrast to uninjured edges (postradiation 2.9 +/- 0.6 mm to follow-up 2.8 +/- 0.6 mm, P =.292), MLD in the radiation segment by QCA analysis significantly decreased from 2.7 +/- 0.4 mm to 2.4 +/- 0.6 mm in geographic miss edges (P =.002). IVUS analysis showed that significant positive remodeling in the radiation segment occurred in uninjured edges (vessel area from 15.4 +/- 4.4 mm2 to 15.8 +/- 4.4 mm2, P =.001) but not in geographic miss edges (vessel area from 12.8 +/- 3.6 mm2 to 13.0 +/- 3.6 mm2, P =.119).

CONCLUSION

The geographic miss might be one of the predictors, which resulted in decreased MLD at follow-up in beta-radiation therapy. Sufficient lesion coverage with radiation might be associated with positive remodeling in the radiation segment.

Coronary artery radiation therapy for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary angioplasty, II: Outcomes of clinical trials

Coronary artery radiation therapy (CART) has become the standard of care for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis after repeat angioplasty. More than 5,000 patients have been enrolled into various clinical trials using 3 major systems. Based on the results of GAMMA I and START trials, both the Checkmate system using (192)Ir and the Betacath system using (90)Sr/Y have been approved for routine clinical use in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. The Galileo system using (32)P with data from INHIBIT trial is pending premarketing approval. With a better understanding and application of radiation oncology concepts to vascular brachytherapy, problems such as geographic miss and/or edge failure should be overcome. The complication of late thrombosis should also become less notable by eliminating restenting at the brachytherapy procedure and the prolonged use of antiplatelet therapy. Although there are other competing modalities in the very early phases of clinical trials, the future of CART appears bright. The durability of results, lack of any important complications, and confirmation of the efficacy in other sites will further consolidate the role of CART in preventing vascular restenosis.

Intracoronary beta-radiation of de novo coronary lesions using a (186)Re liquid-filled balloon system: six-month results from a clinical feasibility study

Vascular brachytherapy has shown to be effective for in-stent restenosis, but efficacy in de novo lesions remains uncertain. We evaluated feasibility and outcome of intracoronary beta-radiation therapy in de novo coronary lesions using a (186)Re liquid-filled balloon system. Thirty-three patients received 20 Gy (186)Re beta-radiation immediately after balloon angioplasty. The 6-month restenosis rate was 41% (12/29) and restenosis was located within the target lesion in eight patients and at the edges of the injured and irradiated segment, outside the target lesion, in four patients. At 6 months, four patients (12%), all stented during the initial procedure, had experienced a late (> 30 days) total occlusion. Intracoronary beta-radiation therapy of de novo coronary lesions using (186)Re is technically feasible. No reduction in restenosis was observed. The high incidence of late total occlusions may have been prevented by avoiding new stent implantation and prolonging double antiplatelet therapy.