Outcomes of Medical Management of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Feasibility of a proposed randomized trial in patients with uncomplicated descending thoracic aortic dissection: Results of worldwide survey

The trial we propose will be the first multicenter, randomized, trial investigating the role of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) compared to conservative (medical) management. To document the current management approaches for uncomplicated TBAD, we performed an international survey in 130 centers (in US and worldwide), of whom 114 (89%) responded. Sixty-three (54.8%) respondents do not routinely stent uncomplicated TBAD, and 43 (37.4%) perform TEVAR based on various imaging criteria. One hundred and one respondents (88.6%) agreed that equipoise was present. Almost all respondents agreed that demonstrating an improvement in major aortic complication-free survival with TBAD would lead to change in practice. The results of the survey demonstrate that a major randomized trial to determine the optimal management strategy for uncomplicated TBAD is warranted.

Standardized Protocol to Analyze Computed Tomography Imaging of Type B Aortic Dissections

Purpose: To propose a standard measuring protocol for type B aortic dissections so as to improve comparability between studies reporting aortic dimensions. Methods: Fifteen computed tomography (CT) scans of type B aortic dissections were measured with a standard protocol by 2 independent observers using postprocessing software. The following parameters were assessed: true, false, and total lumen diameter; true and false lumen volume; and entry tear size, location, and number. Diameters were measured in a perpendicular plane at 2, 10, and 20 cm from the left subclavian artery and 5 cm from the most distal renal artery. True lumen volume was assessed from the left subclavian artery to the aortic bifurcation, while the false lumen volume was from the start to end up to the aortic bifurcation. Entry tear location was assessed in relation to the left subclavian artery. Intra- and interobserver repeatability and agreement were evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, an a priori set of acceptable differences, and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC). Results: Intra- and interobserver mean differences for aortic diameter and true and false lumen volumes were generally within the limits of agreement and the a priori differences; the LCCC showed excellent agreement. Entry tear location, size, and number were difficult to measure in a repeatable manner, with inconsistent correlation coefficients, especially between the 2 observers. Conclusion: This protocol showed acceptable repeatability for aortic diameter and aortic volume measurements. Assessment of entry tears proved challenging and associated with less favorable results. Additionally, investigators are urged to be more transparent regarding the measurement methodology used in studies describing aortic dimensions.

Influence of distal extension of false lumen on adverse aortic events after TEVAR in patients with acute type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical outcomes influenced by distal extension of false lumen in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

From April 2002 to January 2013, 264 TBAD patients treated with TEVAR were retrospectively enrolled. The IIIa group exhibited a distal false lumen above the diaphragm (n = 70), and the IIIb group exhibited a distal false lumen under the diaphragm (n = 194). The morphological characteristics and adverse events (30-day and >30 days) were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the demographics, comorbidity profiles, or initial feature of computed tomography angiography. The incidence of true lumen compression and branch involvement were significantly increased in the IIIb group compared with the IIIa group (8.6% vs. 25.3%, respectively; 15.7% vs. 36.1%, respectively, both P < 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was 1.0% (2/194) in the IIIb group, whereas the IIIa group was zero. The incidence of early adverse events, the 5-year cumulative freedom from adverse events, and the 5-year cumulative freedom from all-cause mortality rate were not significantly different between the IIIa and IIIb groups (2.9% vs. 6.7%, 81.4%, and 80.4%, and 95.7% vs. 93.8%, respectively, all P > 0.05). Log-rank tests also indicated there was no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between the IIIa and IIIb groups in the 5-year morality and adverse aortic events following TEVAR. The distal extension of false lumen prior to TEVAR does not influence the long-term morality and adverse aortic events in acute TBAD.

Cardiac Arrest Due to Dynamic Obstruction of Aorta during Course of the Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Acute aortic occlusion is a catastrophic event requiring early recognition and intervention. The patient was diagnosed type B aortic dissection. He became anuric on the sixth day of illness and the femoral artery pulse was not palpable. Therefore the patient was conveyed to our hospital. During transfer, his blood pressure was suddenly elevated and later he was in cardiopulmonary arrest. After cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the heart resumed beating in several minutes. Acute dynamic obstruction was regarded as a cause of the cardiac arrest. A thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed urgently. His postoperative period was uneventful and the patient was discharged without problems.

Admission Values of D-dimer and C-reactive Protein (CRP) Predict the Long-term Outcomes in Acute Aortic Dissection

Objective Admission D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) values have been reported to predict the short-term outcomes in acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, the association between D-dimer values and the long-term outcomes has not been investigated. Methods The primary endpoints included events determined to be all-cause death, recurrence of aortic dissection, aortic rupture, and surgical intervention for the aortic aneurysm following the first hospital discharge. We performed a receiver operating characteristic analysis and determined the optimal cut-off levels of admission D-dimer, admission CRP and peak CRP values in terms of the sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of events. Using the optimal cut-off values, we performed a multiple Cox analysis and investigated the hazard ratio of admission D-dimer, admission CRP and peak CRP. Patients We retrospectively identified 173 AAD patients hospitalized between January 2005 and December 2013. Results A multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that the hazard ratios were 3.4 for admission D-dimer [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.5 to 7.3, p=0.004] and 2.7 for admission CRP (95% CI 1.2 to 5.5, p=0.014). Conclusion Admission D-dimer and CRP values may predict the long-term outcomes in AAD. Moreover, admission D-dimer values may be a valuable marker to predict not only the short-term outcomes, but also the long-term outcomes in AAD.

Outcomes of Patients With Acute Type B (DeBakey III) Aortic Dissection: A 13-Year, Single-Center Experience

Background—

Aortic dissection remains the most common aortic catastrophe. In the endovascular era, the management of acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD) is undergoing dramatic changes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with ATBAD who were treated at our center over a 13-year period.

Methods and Results—

We reviewed patients with ATBAD between 2001 and 2014, analyzing variables based on status (complicated [c] versus uncomplicated [u]) and treatment modalities. We defined cATBAD as rupture, expansion of diameter on imaging during the admission, persistent pain, or clinical malperfusion leading to a deficit in cerebral, spinal, visceral, renal, or peripheral vascular territories at presentation or during initial hospitalization. Postoperative outcomes were defined as deficits not present before the intervention. Outcomes were compared between the groups by use of Kaplan-Meier and descriptive statistics. We treated 442 patients with ATBAD. Of those 442, 60.6% had uATBAD and were treated medically, and 39.4% had cATBAD, of whom 39.0% were treated medically to 30.0% with open repair, 21.3% with thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and 9.7% with other open peripheral procedures. Intervention-free survival at 1 and 5 years was 84.8% and 62.7% for uATBAD, 61.8% and 44.0% for cATBAD-medical, 69.2% and 47.2% for cATBAD-open, and 68.0% and 42.5% for cATBAD–thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively (P=0.001). Overall survival was significantly related primarily to complicated presentation.

Conclusions—

In our experience, early and late outcomes of ATBAD were dependent on the presence of complications, with cATBAD faring worse. Although uATBAD was associated with favorable early survival, late complications still occurred, mandating radiographic surveillance and open or endovascular interventions. Prospective trials are required to better determine the optimal therapy for uATBAD.

TEVAR: Endovascular Repair of the Thoracic Aorta

The development of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has allowed a minimally invasive approach for management of an array of thoracic aortic pathologies. Initially developed specifically for exclusion of thoracic aortic aneurysms, TEVAR is now used as an alternative to open surgery for a variety of disease pathologies due to the lower morbidity of this approach. Advances in endograft technology continue to broaden the applications of this technique.

Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis during the Medical Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection was Successfully Treated by the Combination of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Installation and Anti-Coagulant Therapy: A Case Report

A 71-year-old woman was admitted with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD). Computed tomography (CT) revealed thrombosis of the false lumen, and we planned to treat medically. She developed transient pleural effusion and hypoxemia, which persisted despite her pleural effusion disappeared. We performed CT and found a large thrombus in the pulmonary artery and femoral vein. We administered low dose- unfractionated heparin and installed a retrievable inferior vena cava filter, which caused the thrombus in the pulmonary artery to disappeared without exacerbating AAD. Our strategy seems to be suitable for acute pulmonary thromboembolism that occurs during the treatment of AAD.

Acute type B aortic dissection with communicating vs. non-communicating false lumen

BACKGROUND

In practice, patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) are generally divided into 2 groups according to the status of the false lumen: non-communicating or communicating. The similarities and differences between the 2 groups, however, have not been fully determined in a large population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 502 patients with Stanford type B AAD. Clinical background at symptom onset was compared, and similarities and differences characterized, for patients with non-communicating (NC group, n=288) vs. communicating (C group, n=214) false lumens. Time of day (00.00-06.00 hours, 06.00-12.00 hours, 12.00-18.00 hours, and 18.00-24.00 hours) and extent of physical activity (extreme exertion, slight exertion, at rest, and sleeping) at symptom onset were similar between groups. Patients in the NC group were older (mean age, 71±11 years vs. 64±14 years, P<0.01) and had lower prevalence of distally extended aortic dissection (26% vs. 8%, P<0.01) and deaths in hospital (2% vs. 7%, P=0.011) than those in the C group.

CONCLUSIONS

At symptom onset, clinical circumstances and physical activity were similar between the groups, and old age and a background of DeBakey IIIa aortic dissection may be associated with determination of false lumen status. The outcome in the NC group was better than in the C group.

Best surgical option for arch extension of type B aortic dissection: the open approach

Arch extension of aortic dissection (AD) is reported to occur in 4-25% of patients presenting with acute type B AD. The DeBakey and Stanford classifications do not specifically account for this subset, however, recent studies have demonstrated that the prognosis of patients with arch extension in acute type B AD is virtually identical to that of others with type B AD. In this sense, it seems reasonable to extend the general management principles that are applied to classic acute type B AD even to patients with arch extension. This may be because even in patients with arch extension, most complications occur at locations distal to the arch, and therefore treatment of these patients is similar to that of complicated type B AD, namely thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Conversely, 10% of patients with acute type B AD and arch extension develop complications that are directly related to the arch pathology. This clinical scenario generally necessitates surgical arch repair through a sternotomy approach. The frozen elephant trunk technique combined with arch repair is a very reasonable option to treat this unique clinical entity that involves relatively distal locations of the aortic diseases. Combined arch and descending aorta replacement through thoracotomy is an alternative option particularly when the anatomical features of the target lesions are not suitable for a sternotomy approach or TEVAR. Nonetheless, the reported mortality associated with this approach has been exceedingly high. Hybrid arch repair is another consideration in treating these patients to reduce the treatment-related mortality and morbidity, especially when the arch pathology is limited to the distal part. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of this procedure in cases with more extensive arch involvement needs to be assessed in further studies in comparison with other treatment modalities.

Lower heart rate in the early postoperative period does not correlate with long-term outcomes after repair of type A acute aortic dissection

Little evidence exists regarding the need for a reduction in postoperative heart rate after repair of type A acute aortic dissection. This single-center retrospective study was conducted to determine if lower heart rate during the early postoperative phase is associated with improved long-term outcomes after surgery for patients with type A acute aortic dissection. We reviewed 434 patients who underwent aortic repair between 1990 and 2011. Based on the average heart rate on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7, 434 patients were divided into four groups, less than 70, 70–79, 80–89, and greater than 90 beats per minute. The mean age was 63.3 ± 12.1 years. During a median follow-up of 52 months (range 16–102), 10-year survival in all groups was 67 %, and the 10-year aortic event-free rate was 79 %. The probability of survival and being aortic event-free using Kaplan–Meier estimates reveal that there is no significant difference when stratified by heart rate. Cox proportional regression analysis for 10-year mortality shows that significant predictors of mortality are age [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.04; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.06; p = 0.001] and perioperative stroke (HR 2.30; 95 % CI 1.18–4.50; p = 0.024). Neither stratified heart rate around the time of surgery nor beta-blocker use at the time of discharge was significant. There is no association between stratified heart rate in the perioperative period with long-term outcomes after repair of type A acute aortic dissection. These findings need clarification with further clinical trials.

Surgical thrombectomy for right heart thrombus with acute aortic dissection

An 81-year-old female complaining of severe back pain was admitted to hospital and diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection with a thrombosed false lumen. Aggressive antihypertensive therapy was selected. On day 8, computed tomography showed pulmonary artery thrombus, and transthoracic echocardiography showed a 76×70 mm worm-like floating right heart thrombus. Thrombolytic therapy is reported to be the optimal treatment for patients with pulmonary embolism and floating right heart thrombus, but is contraindicated in acute aortic dissection. The patient underwent surgical thrombectomy, which revealed thrombus entrapped in the Chiari network. An inferior vena cava filter was placed. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged home after initiation of warfarin therapy.

Debate: Whether level I evidence comparing thoracic endovascular repair and medical management is necessary for uncomplicated type B aortic dissections

Type B aortic dissections continue to be one of the most challenging clinical scenarios confronting vascular surgeons. In the era of open surgery, the therapeutic options were limited to medical management of hypertension and large open thoracoabdominal operations. In the current endovascular era, the operative strategies have become less invasive but the questions regarding therapeutic approaches have become more numerous and complex. In patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissections, we are still unsure as to which patients are best treated with medical therapy alone or with the addition of early endovascular repair. Data from single centers and registries have provided some guidance; however, questions remain. Perhaps level 1 evidence from well-designed randomized controlled trials will answer all of our questions. This is the topic of the current debate.

Current evidence for thoracic aorta type B dissection management

Aortic dissection is a devastating cardiovascular condition and represents the most common aortic emergency. Outcome is determined by the type and extent of dissection and the presence of associated complications requiring early diagnosis and treatment. Aortic dissection is defined as acute within 14 days from onset and chronic after that time period. The natural course of type B dissection is determined by 2 elements, early and chronic complications. An uncomplicated acute type B dissection is less frequently lethal but it is not totally benign. Some peculiar issues must be taken into account, such as the high probability of complications development in a dissected aorta and the poor long-term prognosis on medical treatment alone. Then, it would be helpful to identify which patients with uncomplicated type B dissection will have a poorest aortic prognosis over time in order to apply an early intervention.

Acute aortic emergencies--part 2: aortic dissections

Patients with aortic disease are some of the highest acuity patients that emergency clinicians encounter. Dissection is the most common aortic catastrophe and involves separation of the aortic layers in a longitudinal fashion leading to diminished perfusion and systemic ischemia. Characteristics of pain, branch vessel involvement, and incidence lead to an understanding of patient presentation, morbidity, and mortality. Diagnosis, selection of diagnostic studies, the degree of preoperative ischemia, and risk of operative mortality can be accomplished using validated clinical decision tools. Emergency interventions are guided by the type of dissection according to the Stanford classification system. Medical management includes pain control and anti-impulse, antihypertensive therapy through vasodilatation and blockage of the sympathetic β-response. The patient may then be evaluated for open surgical intervention, aortic fenestration, endovascularly placed stent grafts, or a combination possibly in a staged approach. Morbidity includes rupture, stroke, paraplegia, acute renal failure, bowel ischemia, and peripheral ischemia.

[Stent graft of the thoracic aorta]

Considering the demographic changes in our society and the proliferation of imaging-based improved diagnostics, both acute and chronic aortic diseases attract increasing attention and require dedicated care. Cardiac as well as vascular surgery used to represent the gold standards for therapeutic management of pathologies of the ascending aorta and the arch; however, the technological evolution of endoluminal strategies has had a serious impact on the treatment of the descending aorta, the aortic arch in combination with vascular debranching or bypass, and in selected cases even on managing pathologies of the ascending aorta. Although several case series and meta-analyses of published observations hint towards superiority of endografting in comparison to open surgical repair, the affected usually multimorbid patients with highly complex aortic disease should be subjected to an individual evaluation by a team of cardiologists, cardiac and vascular surgeons as well as imaging specialists; a dedicated individualized treatment concept in highly experienced centers of excellence is likely to provide the best results for such challenging patients.

Interdisciplinary team approach for complicated type B aortic dissection with concomitant hematothorax by endovascular stent grafting and left side mini thoracotomy: a case report

Due to high mortality rates in surgical treatment, total endovascular stent grafting has become a promising therapeutic option in patients with acute aortic dissection type B. In our case, a 76- year- old patient with acute ruptured aortic dissection type B and hematothorax achieved concomitant total endovascular stent grafting and left side mini thoracotomy. With moderate neurologic impairment he was discharged from hospital after 20 days.

This case shows that early mortality of live threatening acute aortic dissection type B with hemorrhagic pleural effusion may be reduced by total endovascular stent grafting and concomitant mini thoracotomy.

Pharmacological management of hypertensive emergencies and urgencies: focus on newer agents

INTRODUCTION

Hypertensive crises are categorized as hypertensive emergencies and urgencies depending on the presence of acute target-organ damage; the former are potentially life-threatening medical conditions, requiring urgent treatment under close monitoring. Although several short-acting intravenous antihypertensive agents are approved for this purpose, until recently little evidence from proper trials on the relative merits of different therapies was available.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses in brief the pathophysiology, epidemiology and diagnostic approach of hypertensive crises and provides an extensive overview of established and emerging pharmacological agents for the treatment of patients with hypertensive emergencies and urgencies.

EXPERT OPINION

Agents such as sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin and hydralazine have been used for many years as first-line options for patients with hypertensive emergencies, although their potential adverse effects and difficulties in use were well known. With time, equally potent and less toxic alternatives, including nicardipine, fenoldopam, labetalol and esmolol are increasingly used worldwide. Recently, clevidipine, a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker with unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties was added to our therapeutic armamentarium and was shown in clinical trials to reduce mortality when compared with nitroprusside. In view of such evidence, a change in pharmacological treatment practices for hypertensive crises toward newer and safer agents is warranted.

Early entry closure for acute type B aortic dissection by open stent grafting

PURPOSE

We describe the long-term efficacy of early entry closure for acute type B aortic dissection by open stent grafting based on long-term results and changes in the false lumen on enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

We performed open stent grafting for acute type B aortic dissection in 28 28 patients between 1998 a 2008. They included 14 patients with complicated type B aortic dissection (11 patients with limb and/or visceral ischemia and 4 patients with impending rupture). Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection was present in 14 patients, including 4 patients with an ulcer-like projection and 10 patients who had stable dissection with a patent false lumen.

RESULTS

Two patients who had the ischemic type died within 30 days. Postoperative complications occurred in two patients, including one case of paraplegia and one of mediastinitis. Two more deaths occurred during a median follow-up period of 45 months (range 6-114 months), with one related to open stent-graft infection and one due to pneumonia. The overall survival rate 5 years after open stent grafting was 77%. According to follow-up by CT, the false lumen was completely thrombosed and obliterated in all 26 patients with stent grafts.

CONCLUSION

Early entry closure for both complicated and uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection with an open stent graft has an acceptable early outcome and provides a high aortic remodeling rate.

Re-elevation of D-dimer as a predictor of re-dissection and venous thromboembolism after Stanford type B acute aortic dissection

D-dimer measurement is a useful complementary initial diagnostic marker in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD). However, it has not been clarified whether serial measurements of D-dimer are useful during in-hospital management of Stanford type B AAD. We studied 30 patients who were admitted with diagnosis of Stanford type B AAD and treated conservatively. D-dimer was serially measured on admission and then every 5 days during hospitalization. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of re-elevation of D-dimer during hospitalization, in which D-dimer transition were biphasic and latter peak >10.0 μg/ml. Re-elevation of D-dimer was observed in 17 patients. There were no differences in atherosclerotic risk factors, blood pressure on admission, D-dimer level on admission, extent of AAD, and false lumen patency. Patients with re-elevation of D-dimer showed higher incidence of re-dissection and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE). Peak D-dimer level in patients with re-dissection and/or VTE was significantly higher than that without these complications (p = 0.005). In conclusion, serial measurements of D-dimer are useful for early detection of re-dissection or VTE in patients with Stanford type B AAD, which may contribute to the prevention of disastrous consequences such as pulmonary embolism and extension of AAD.

Acute complicated and uncomplicated type III aortic dissection: an endovascular perspective

Type III aortic dissection is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is a shifting paradigm in the treatment of complicated and uncomplicated acute type III aortic dissection toward earlier endovascular repair. In this review, the authors present the current perspective on the endovascular management of acute complicated and uncomplicated type III aortic dissection.

Outcome of open and endovascular repair in acute type B aortic dissection: a retrospective and observational study

Background

The aim of the study was to analyze surgical and endovascular results in the treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (B AAD).

Methods

Retrospective and observational analysis with patient inclusion between January 2001-December 2008 and follow-up ranged from 2 to 96 months (median = 47.2) was performed. Out of 51 consecutive patients with B AAD, 11 (21.6%) had to undergo open surgery (OS) and 13 (25.5%) endovascular treatment (TEVAR).

Results

There was a significantly difference in early mortality in the TEVAR group (0/13,0%) vs OS group (4/11,36.4%, P < 0.05) and in the incidence of paraplegia/paraparesis (OS 2,28.6% vs TEVAR 1,7.7%, P < 0.05), renal failure (OS 3, 42.8% vs TEVAR 1, 7.7%, P < 0.05), respiratory failure (OS 2,28.6% vs TEVAR 1,7.7%, P < 0.05) and cerebrovascular accident (OS 1,14.3% vs TEVAR 0,0%, P < 0.05). The late mortality at a follow-up was 30.8% (4/13) in the TEVAR group and 42.8% (3/7) in the OS group, respectively (P = not significant). The cumulative survival rate after 1, 3 and 8 years was 93%, 84%, and 69% in the TEVAR group and 86%, 71% and 57% in the OS group, respectively. Endoleaks were diagnosed in 2/13 endovascular patients (15.4%).

Conclusions

TEVAR group had a significantly reduction in early mortality and postoperative complications. No significant differences were found in terms of cumulative survival at follow-up. On this basis TEVAR could be considered an option in the treatment of these complex cases with all proper reservation especially related to the small sample sizes examined.

Cocaine and aortic dissection

Aortic dissection is a rare, potentially catastrophic vascular emergency. Early recognition of the clinical manifestations, rapid confirmation using imaging modalities, urgent administration of appropriate medication and expedient selection of definitive long-term therapy are key to preserving life and reducing morbidity. In recent years it has become increasingly clear that there is a relation between cocaine and aortic dissection. Cocaine serves as both a predisposing factor to aortic dissection due to its effect on aortic connective tissue and as a precipitating factor due to its propensity to produce abrupt and severe hypertension. While similarities exist in the clinical features and diagnostic methods between cocaine-related aortic dissection and aortic dissection unrelated to cocaine use, there are important differences in management between these two syndromes which are rooted in the pharmacology and physiology of cocaine. An understanding of these differences is key to effective early and long-term management of cocaine-related aortic dissection.

TEVAR for acute uncomplicated aortic dissection: immediate repair versus medical therapy

Medical management remains the standard treatment modality for acute uncomplicated descending aortic dissections. Intervention (by either open surgery or an endovascular approach) is currently reserved for patients who present with or subsequently develop complications (ie, complicated dissections). Despite the success of medical therapy in the acute management of uncomplicated dissection, long-term morbidity and mortality are far from ideal. The introduction of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been associated with reductions in morbidity and mortality in the treatment of complicated dissections. There is limited data regarding TEVAR for acute uncomplicated dissections. Early results from the INSTEAD (Investigation of Stent Grafts in Patients with Type B Aortic Dissection) trial, a randomized trial for TEVAR in subacute/chronic uncomplicated dissections, were not favorable. The ADSORB (Acute Uncomplicated Aortic Dissection Type B: Evaluating Stent-Graft Placement or Best Medical Treatment Alone) trial, a randomized trial for TEVAR in acute dissections, is currently underway. Nonetheless, current data available, including multiple reports proposing a variety of predictive factors, suggest that there may be a subset of higher-risk patients with acute uncomplicated dissections who could benefit from TEVAR.

Limb ischaemia in a Stanford B aortic dissection into an abdominal aortic aneurysm

Aortic dissection presenting with acute lower limb ischaemia is not uncommon. However, stanford B dissection into a pre-existing abdominal aortic aneurysm resulting in bilateral lower limb ischaemia has not been reported in the literature. This patient underwent unsuccessful revascularisation of the lower limbs with an axillo-bifemoral bypass procedure.