Consultative total parenteral nutrition teams: the effect on the incidence of total parenteral nutrition-related complications

Relative importance of amino acid infusion as a means of sparing protein in surgical patients

We performed isotopic infusions in 51 surgical patients to investigate the effectiveness of different substrates to conserve protein. All patients were initially studied in the basal state and then the effects of glucose infusion (GL, N = 13), lipid infusion (LIP, N = 11), or amino acid infusion (AA, N = 17) were determined. Ten patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were also studied. The basal value for net protein catabolism (NPC) in GL patients was 1.53 +/- 0.4 (SEM) g/kg/day decreasing to 1.39 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day during glucose infusion (p less than 0.01). The basal NPC in the LIP group was 2.04 +/- 0.4 g/kg/day decreasing to 1.72 +/- 0.3 g/kg/day during lipid infusion (p less than 0.01). In the TPN patients the NPC was 0.79 +/- 0.46 g/kg/day whereas in the AA patients the basal value for NPC was 1.37 +/- 0.14 g/kg/day decreasing to -0.77 +/- 0.11 g/kg/day during amino acid infusion (p less than 0.0005). From our study we conclude that: (1) All substrates commonly used in intravenous feeding have the capacity to spare protein. (2) Protein sparing was more pronounced when a balanced amino acid infusion was used than with either glucose or lipid infusion alone. (3) This effect is not solely due to insulin secretion as larger insulin responses were seen with both GL and TPN patients. (4) These results may have implications for peripheral vein feeding with amino acid solutions where there is a contraindication for full TPN or the lack of resources for administering it.

Evaluation of an information booklet for general practitioners with patients on home parenteral nutrition

An information package was developed for general practitioners (GPs) involved in the management of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) patients. The booklet covered five major sections: background information; HPN training; complications of HPN; arrangements for a particular patient; and hospital management of HPN. This study was designed to determine the acceptability of the booklet to GPs. A booklet and a questionnaire were distributed to 30 GPs; 23 were returned. The majority of respondents found the booklet easy to read and interesting. Most GPs found the sections on general background information and possible complications to be of great value. Overall, the booklet was very well accepted, 96% of respondents stated that the information provided was of value.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose intravenous versus intramuscular vitamin K in parenteral nutrition patients

Efficacy and safety of intravenous and intramuscular vitamin K were compared prospectively in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Sixty patients randomly received either a 1-mg daily iv injection (iv group) or a 10-mg weekly injection group (im group). Efficacy was determined by the prolongation of twice-weekly prothrombin (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin (APTT) times. The prolongation of both was not significantly different between the im and iv groups. The percent of PTs outside the normal range was not different for the two groups, although the iv group had more APTT values outside the range than did the im group (p = 0.002). The number of adverse reactions reported in the iv (5) and im (4) groups was also similar. Reactions were minor, not reproducible, and all patients recovered without sequelae. PT results from the iv and im groups were combined and compared to values from 28 patients in an earlier study who did not receive vitamin K. PTs in the no-vitamin K group were significantly prolonged over the vitamin K group (p = 0.0004). The results confirm that regular addition of vitamin K to TPN regimens decreases the incidence of elevated PTs. When administered appropriately, iv and im administration of vitamin K appear to be equally safe and effective in maintaining normal PTs and APTTs.

Assessing the Nutrition Support Team

The development of clinical nutrition in the past few years has occasioned a rapid proliferation of hundreds of nutrition support teams across the country. Data available in several surveys of these teams suggest that they are so likely to differ from one another that they scarcely merit a common name. Some standard is clearly needed. A formulation of the essential features that should be found in every NST is presented. In light of this conceptual framework, data on the efficacy of NSTs are discussed. It is suggested that, although there is enough favorable evidence in cost-effectiveness for a hospital to establish an NST, the full potential of the NST as the proper repositor of a new branch of medicine (Clinical Nutrition) has yet to be widely recognized and properly tested.

Nutritional support team vs nonteam management of enteral nutritional support in a Veterans Administration Medical Center teaching hospital

One hundred one patients receiving enteral nutritional support (ENS) by tube feeding during a 5-month period were prospectively studied. Fifty patients were managed by a nutritional support team (T) and 51 patients were managed by the nonteam approach (NT). Demographics, primary diagnosis, chronic diseases, medical service, calculated basal energy expenditure (BEE), duration of ENS, and final patient disposition were recorded. Enteral formula, formula modifications, results of laboratory tests and calories delivered were obtained daily. Results of nitrogen balance studies were obtained when available and each patient was monitored for pulmonary, mechanical, gastrointestinal, and metabolic abnormalities. No significant difference was found between the team and nonteam managed groups in regard to total feeding days, mean feeding days per patient, total laboratory tests, laboratory tests per patient or laboratory tests per day. Significantly more team patients attained 1.2 times BEE (T = 47, NT = 38, p less than 0.05) for a significantly greater period of time (T = 398 days, NT = 281 days, p less than 0.05). Significantly more team patients achieved a measured positive nitrogen balance than nonteam patients (T = 42, NT = 1, p less than 0.05). Formula modifications to correct nutritional or metabolic aberrations were made in 15 (30%) team patients and five (9.8%) nonteam patients (p less than 0.05). The number of individual abnormalities (pulmonary, mechanical, gastrointestinal, and metabolic), as well as total abnormalities occurring in the team-managed group, was significantly lower than in the nonteam managed group (160 vs 695, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Total parenteral nutrition and cancer clinical trials

Twenty-eight prospective randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the use of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in cancer patients were identified through a search of major indexing sources. The data were pooled across studies to increase the ability to detect therapeutic effects. The impact of publication bias and the quality of reporting each trial were used to critically assess the conclusions drawn from the pooled analysis. The authors conclude that TPN may be useful when used preoperatively in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer. It appears to be beneficial in reducing major surgical complications (pooled P = 0.01) and operative mortality (pooled P = 0.02). No statistically significant benefit from TPN could be demonstrated in survival, treatment tolerance, treatment toxicity, or tumor response in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. An increase in the risk of developing an infection in chemotherapy patients given TPN (pooled P less than 0.0001) underscores the importance of demonstrating significant benefits in randomized trials before TPN is used routinely in these patients.

Total parenteral nutrition by a nutrition support team: improved quality of care

Most of the studies that have examined the effect of nutrition support teams (NST) on the quality of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) have found reductions in the frequency of metabolic and central venous catheter related complications. Previous studies have not examined the patterns of nutrient delivery (eg, calories and protein) when TPN is provided either by a primary physician or by a NST. We compared the quality of TPN care provided by our NST or by primary physicians utilizing nonspecialized hospital personnel and resources. As expected, catheter complications were significantly less frequent in NST patients. Assessment of nutritional status and nutrient requirements as well as nitrogen balance were performed and documented significantly more often in NST patients. In addition, nutritional goals for calories and protein were achieved and positive nitrogen balance documented more often in NST patients. The need to consult the NST physician to utilize the NST was not well received by primary attending and resident physicians and resulted in nonuse of the team. In the future, modification of NST policies will be explored to encourage greater utilization of the NST without compromising the high standard of nutrition care delivered by the NST.