Motion loss after ligament injuries to the knee. Part I: causes

The influence of posterolateral rotatory instability on ACL reconstruction: comparison between isolated ACL reconstruction and ACL reconstruction combined with posterolateral corner reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the influence of posterolateral corner reconstruction on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in terms of anterior laxity and clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that the effects of combined ACL and posterolateral corner reconstruction would be less satisfactory than those of isolated ACL reconstruction in terms of anterior laxity and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied sixty-nine patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from February 2001 to December 2005. Forty-six patients underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (Group I), and twenty-three patients underwent combined ACL and posterolateral corner reconstruction (Group II). Clinical outcomes were determined from data obtained before surgery and at the time of the twenty-four-month follow-up examination.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean side-to-side difference (and standard deviation) in anterior tibial translation, measured with a KT2000 arthrometer, was greater for Group I (2.2 ± 1.0 mm) than for Group II (1.6 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.031). Seven knees (15.2%) in Group I and two knees (8.7%) in Group II had grade-1 anterior translation. The mean Lysholm score was 93.2 in Group I and 90.1 in Group II (p = 0.392). Thirty-eight knees (82.6%) in Group I and twenty knees (87.0%) in Group II were classified as normal or nearly normal according to the International Knee Documentation Committee scoring system (p = 0.882).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the evaluation of ligamentous laxity with use of the KT2000 arthrometer, we observed that combined ACL and posterolateral corner reconstruction allows less anterior translation than isolated ACL reconstruction. However, we could not identify significant differences between the two groups in terms of functional outcomes.

Pre-operative factors predicting good outcome in terms of health-related quality of life after ACL reconstruction

The life situation of many patients changes after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and subsequent reconstruction, and this may affect their health-related quality of life in many ways. It is well known that the overall clinical results after ACL reconstruction are considered good, but pre-operative predictive factors for a good post-operative clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction have not been studied in as much detail. The purpose of this study was to identify pre-operative factors that predict a good post-operative outcome as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) 3-6 years after ACL reconstruction. Seventy-three patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction were clinically examined pre-operatively. The SF-36 and KOOS questionnaires were sent by mail to these patients 3-6 years after reconstruction. Predictive factors for health-related quality of life were investigated using a stepwise regression analysis. In conclusion, pre-operative factors, such as pivot shift, knee function, and range of motion, may predict a good post-operative outcome and explain up to 25% in terms of health-related quality of life after ACL reconstruction. Furthermore, it appears that the patients' pre-injury and pre-operative Tegner activity levels are important predictors of post-operative health-related quality of life.

The effect of tibio-femoral traction mobilization on passive knee flexion motion impairment and pain: a case series

The purpose of this case series was to explore the effects of tibio-femoral (TF) manual traction on pain and passive range of motion (PROM) in individuals with unilateral motion impairment and pain in knee flexion. Thirteen participants volunteered for the study. All participants received 6 minutes of TF traction mobilization applied at end-range passive knee flexion. PROM measurements were taken before the intervention and after 2, 4, and 6 minutes of TF joint traction. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale with the TF joint at rest, at end-range passive knee flexion, during the application of joint traction, and immediately post-treatment. There were significant differences in PROM after 2 and 4 minutes of traction, with no significance noted after 4 minutes. A significant change in knee flexion of 25.9°, which exceeded the MDC(95,) was found when comparing PROM measurements pre- to final intervention. While pain did not change significantly over time, pain levels did change significantly during each treatment session. Pain significantly increased when the participant's knee was passively flexed to end range; it was reduced, although not significantly, during traction mobilization; and it significantly decreased following traction. This case series supports TF joint traction as a means of stretching shortened articular and periarticular tissues without increasing reported levels of pain during or after treatment. In addition, this is the first study documenting the temporal aspects of treatment effectiveness in motion restoration.

Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction

As interest in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction grows, we continue to refine our technique to perform the most anatomic reconstruction possible. Our experience has brought to our attention the potential mistakes that should be avoided when performing an anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. These mistakes include (1) failure to visualize the femoral insertion completely, (2) use of the clock face to reference femoral tunnel positioning, (3) nonanatomic tunnel placement leading to graft impingement, (4) mismatching tibial and femoral tunnels, and (5) failure to restore the native tension pattern of the ACL. It is also important to recognize that a double-bundle ACL reconstruction is not necessarily equivalent to an anatomic double-bundle reconstruction. This article reviews potential mistakes in DB ACL reconstruction and describes our way of avoiding them.

Knee stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the incidence and associated factors of knee stiffness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

We reviewed 100 patients retrospectively following primary ACL reconstruction with quadruple hamstring autografts to evaluate the incidence and factors associated with postoperative stiffness. Stiffness was defined as any loss of motion using the contra-lateral leg as a control. The median delay between injury and operation was 15 months. The incidence of stiffness was 12% at 6 months post-reconstruction. Both incomplete attendance at physiotherapy (p<0.005) and previous knee surgery (p<0.005) were the strongest predictors of the stiffness. Anterior knee pain was also associated with the stiffness (p<0.029). Factors that failed to show a significant association with the stiffness included associated MCL sprain at injury (p=0.32), post-injury stiffness (p=1.00) and concomitant menisectomy at reconstruction (p=0.54). Timing of surgery also did not appear to influence the onset of stiffness (median delays: 29 months for stiff patients; 14 months for non-stiff patients). The rate of stiffness fell to 5% at 12 months postreconstruction, without operative intervention.

Oral corticosteroid use for loss of flexion after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Postoperative loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can lead to suboptimal outcomes. Short-term low-dose oral corticosteroids are an option for nonsurgical management of this condition. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively review a series of patients treated with a single Medrol Dosepak (MDP) (Pfizer, New York, NY) in the early postoperative period for the treatment of loss of flexion, focusing on range of motion, objective instrumented stability measurements, and complications.

METHODS

From September 1, 2003, through January 1, 2007, 28 (11%) of 252 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction were treated with an MDP at a mean of 6.1 weeks postoperatively (range, 4 to 12 weeks; SD, 1.4 weeks) for early postoperative loss of motion. Of these 28 patients, 4 were not included because of unavailable clinical records. One patient who underwent combined ACL and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial collateral ligament repair was excluded from the analysis. Range-of-motion and KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) measurements were independently recorded by a single examiner preoperatively, at 6 weeks postoperatively, and again at final follow-up evaluation at a mean of 10.4 months (range, 4 to 24 months; SD, 4.3 months).

RESULTS

The mean flexion deficit compared with the normal, contralateral knee at the time of treatment with an MDP was 31.3 degrees (range, -2 degrees to 55 degrees ; SD, 14.8 degrees ). Patients treated with an MDP showed a significant improvement in flexion deficit (mean, 29.2 degrees; range, 0 degrees to 60 degrees ; SD, 17.1 degrees ) after MDP treatment (P < .001). KT-1000 side-to-side differences at final examination were 2 mm or less in 22 of 23 patients (mean, 1 mm; range, 0 to 4 mm; SD, 1 mm). Of the 23 patients treated with an MDP, 5 (22%) were considered failures because they required surgical intervention for persistent loss of motion, resulting in a reoperation rate for loss of motion after primary ACL reconstruction of 2.0% (5/252). There were no documented complications of MDP treatment. Specifically, no patients treated with an MDP had a postoperative infection develop.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of oral corticosteroids, in the form of an MDP, was associated with a successful return of normal range of motion in 78% of patients with early postsurgical loss of flexion and near-normal extension after primary ACL reconstruction without any associated complications or decrease in objective instrumented stability measurements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Case series utilizing drop-out casting for the treatment of knee joint extension motion loss following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Four patients who had developed knee extension motion loss following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were referred to physical therapy for treatment. They were treated with drop-out casting and completed a Lower Extremity Functional Scale at baseline, at the time of application of the drop-out casting, and at discharge.

OUTCOMES

Three males and 1 female with a mean age of 20.5 years (range, 18-22 years) were referred to physical therapy a mean of 31 days (range, 19-49 days) following bone-patella tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The mean number of physical therapy sessions attended was 29.5 visits (range, 20-47 visits). The mean improvement in knee extension range of motion (ROM) and knee flexion ROM prior to the application of drop-out casting was 4.3 degrees (range, -1 degree to 10 degrees) and 24.3 degrees (range, 0 degree to 40 degrees), respectively. The mean improvement on the Lower Extremity Functional Scale was 10.3 points prior to drop-out casting. At time of discharge, the total mean improvement in knee extension ROM loss was 11.0 degrees (range, 4 degrees to 15 degrees), knee flexion ROM was 30.8 degrees (range, 22 degrees to 35 degrees), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale was 12 points (range, -5 to 21 points). Two of the patients were able to complete a running program without difficulty, while the other 2 patients had difficulty with higher-level activities.

DISCUSSION

Despite the low incidence of knee extension ROM loss following surgery, the inability to achieve full knee extension does occur and can have debilitating consequences. When early emphasis of full passive knee extension has been inadequate, these results suggest that improving knee extension motion without inhibiting knee flexion motion is possible with the use of a drop-out cast. Future research should focus on comparison of drop-out casting to dynamic splinting, as well as the optimal frequency and duration of low-load long-duration stretching using a drop-out cast.

Incidence of motion loss of the stifle joint in dogs with naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament rupture surgically treated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: longitudinal clinical study of 412 cases

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence of loss of stifle extension or flexion and its relationship with clinical lameness after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture.

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal study.

ANIMALS

Dogs (n=280) with CCL rupture (n=412).

METHODS

TPLO was performed without meniscal release or arthrotomy. Angles of extension and flexion of the stifle were measured by goniometry to determine range of motion. Based upon motion loss, stifles were divided in 3 groups: no loss of extension or flexion (n=322), <10 degrees loss of extension or flexion (n=78), > or =10 degrees loss of extension or flexion (n=12).

RESULTS

Loss of extension or flexion > or =10 degrees was associated with significantly (P=.001) higher clinical lameness scores in comparison with no loss, or loss of extension or flexion <10 degrees. Osteoarthrosis in the cranial femorotibial joint was significantly correlated (P<.005, r(2)=0.55) with loss of extension. Loss of extension > or =10 degrees was less tolerable and less amenable to physical rehabilitation than flexion loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of extension or flexion > or =10 degrees was responsible for higher clinical lameness scores. Osteoarthrosis in the cranial femorotibial joint led to extension loss.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Loss of extension or flexion should be assessed in dogs with persistent clinical lameness after TPLO so that early intervention can occur. Our study provides guidelines to define clinically relevant loss of extension or flexion of stifle joint after TPLO.

Malrotation in total knee arthroplasty: effect on tibial cortex strain captured by laser-based strain acquisition

BACKGROUND

Malrotation of the tibial and femoral components has been recognized to be a clinical complication affecting the performance and durability of total knee arthroplasty. This study used a novel strain acquisition technique to determine the effect of tibio-femoral component malrotation on tibial torque and strain distribution of the proximal tibial cortex with a cemented fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized knee.

METHODS

Using electronic speckle pattern interferometry, strain on the proximal tibia of human cadaveric knees was obtained in response to 1500N axial loading for neutrally aligned tibial and femoral components, and for 10 degrees internal and external malrotation between the tibial and femoral components. Local strain gage measurements were combined with full-field optical strain measurements to quantify effects on tibial cortex strain and strain distributions caused by the 10 degrees malrotations. In addition, tibial torque was measured for incremental degrees of tibio-femoral malrotation.

FINDINGS

Tibio-femoral malrotations as small as 2 degrees caused tibial torque in excess of 4 Nm. At 10 degrees malrotation, tibial torque significantly increased to over 8 Nm (P<0.001) as compared to neutrally aligned components. Local strain gage results significantly increased from 500 muepsilon to 632 muepsilon compressive strain in response to 10 degrees external malrotation, and to 1000 muepsilon compressive strain in response to 10 degrees internal malrotation. Full-field optical strain reports yielded the highest strain of 2153 muepsilon for 10 degrees internal malrotation 30 mm below the joint line.

INTERPRETATION

Laser-based strain measurement technology provides novel capabilities to capture cortex strain fields. The sensitivity of cortex strain and torsion to small amounts of tibio-femoral malrotation may explain factors contributing to aseptic implant loosening of the tibial component.

Prevention of shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair

Predisposing factors for shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair have yet to be determined. The potential for recovery of range of motion and amelioration of pain in patients with this complication also remains unclear. Accordingly, data collected prospectively for 209 patients with a primary rotator cuff repair were retrospectively reviewed. Two groups, Group A (early motion recovery) and Group B (shoulder stiffness), were selected according to passive shoulder range of motion outcomes 6 weeks postoperatively. Both groups were compared for 10 descriptive and clinical characteristics, and for passive range of motion, muscle force, and functional outcomes obtained 0, 6, 12, 24, and 76 weeks postoperatively. Of the potential prognostic factors examined, restriction of range of motion for the preoperative hand behind the back best predicted shoulder stiffness at 6 weeks postoperatively. For patients with postoperative shoulder stiffness, pain had subsided by 24 weeks postoperatively, whereas range of motion steadily improved between 6 weeks and 76 weeks postoperatively. Results of the current study support a predictive role for restriction of range of motion for the preoperative hand behind the back, and affirms the potential for nearly complete recovery of range of motion and amelioration of pain in patients who have shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level I-1 (prospective study).

Screening for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of association with human leukocyte antigen

PURPOSE

Arthrofibrosis represents a severe complication of trauma and reconstructive joint surgery because of generalized connective tissue proliferation resulting in painful joint stiffness. It often appears stereotypical in terms of its clinical and pathologic features, comprising excess deposition of extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen type I, III, and VI and proliferation of fibroblasts. However, trauma and surgery around joints does not always lead to fibrosis, suggesting a genetic predisposition. For a number of autoimmune diseases, strong associations have been described. The objective of the study was to investigate whether an association of HLA (human leukocyte antigen) with primary arthrofibrosis exists.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with primary arthrofibrosis after autologous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were identified and clinically reviewed. Blood samples were taken, and DNA was isolated by column extraction method. DNA samples were typed for the loci HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1. Results were compared with the frequencies of allelic groups as determined for the caucasoid population.

RESULTS

HLA-Cw*07 was significantly less often found in the patient group than in the general population (P =.022). The opposite effect was seen for Cw*08, which was found in 17.6% of the patient group but only in 3.8% of the reference group (P =.045). A significant difference was also seen for DQB1*06, because 23.5% of the patients but 48.6% of the reference group possessed an allelic variant of this group (P =.048). However, according to the relatively small number of patients, a statistical bias cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

A possible link may exist between arthrofibrosis and HLA-Cw*07- and DQB1*06-negative as well as Cw*08-positive individuals. Further investigation is necesessary to confirm or vitiate the possible association.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Indirect injury stimulates scar formation-adaptation or pathology?

In several animal models of osteoarthritis induced by cruciate ligament transection, a dense, scar-like tissue mass forms rapidly on the medial side of the knee joint. This mass mimics clinical fibrosis that sometimes occurs after joint surgery. It is unknown exactly why this medial tissue mass forms and what cells are involved in its formation. This study characterizes this medial mass by histology, biochemistry, and the expression of types I and III collagen mRNA. The medial mass is compared with the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and the MCL epiligament in anterior cruciate-transected and unoperated joints, and to normal skin and skin scar. The morphology of the medial mass resembled the epiligament and skin scar more than the MCL. The concentration of DNA and RNA and the RNA-DNA ratio were elevated dramatically in the medial mass compared with all other tissues including skin scar. However, the mRNA copy number and ratio of collagen types I and III mRNAs did not differ significantly among the medial mass, MCL, epiligament, and skin in either the control or the operated joints. The response of the medial mass, MCL, and MCL epiligament to cruciate transaction involves both hyperplasia and hypertrophy, but without a dramatic shift in cell phenotype. The medial mass may be a useful mimic or model of intraarticular adhesions, hypertrophic scars, ligament sprains, and arthrofibrosis.

Can a post-operative brace in slight hyperextension prevent extension deficit after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomised study

It has been our observation that post-operative anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) braces together with the post-operative bandages do not always allow the knee to reach full extension. In ten uninjured knees with known hyperextension, the knees were bandaged in the same way as after an ACL-reconstruction. The knees were then studied radiologically in a Hypex brace set at 0 degrees, -5 degrees and -10 degrees of knee extension. Not a single knee was found to be straight in the brace set at 0 degrees. At -5 degrees most of the knees were straight or in slight hyperextension. It took -10 degrees to get all knees straight or in hyperextension. In a prospective randomised study 44 patients who underwent an arthroscopic ACL-reconstruction with a bone patellar tendon bone graft were randomised to use either a brace set at -5 degrees or a straight brace (0 degrees ) for at least the first three postoperative weeks. Before and three months after surgery range of motion was determined, using a goniometer with long arms, and sagittal knee laxity was measured with a KT-2000 arthrometer at manual max. Pre- and post-operative pain was evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The same examiner (blindfolded to what type of brace was used) performed all the measurements. At three months, two of the 22 patients with the brace set at -5 degrees and twelve of the 22 patients with the straight brace had a loss of full extension of 2 degrees or more ( p<0.001). No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of knee flexion, sagittal knee laxity or post-operative pain. Although extension deficit after ACL-reconstruction can be prevented also in other ways, a Hypex brace set at -5 degrees seems to be an easy way of ensuring full knee extension.

Recent advances in the rehabilitation of isolated and combined anterior cruciate ligament injuries

The rehabilitation process begins immediately following ACL injury, with emphasis on reducing swelling and inflammation; improving motion; regaining quadriceps control; allowing immediate weight-bearing; and restoring full passive knee extension and, gradually, flexion. The goal of preoperative rehabilitation is to prepare the patient mentally and physically for surgery. Once the ACL surgery is performed, it is important to alter the rehab program based on the type of graft used and any concomitant procedures performed. This will aid in preventing several postoperative complications, such as loss of motion, patellofemoral pain, graft failure, and muscular weakness. The goal of this article has been to provide an overview of the application and the scientific basis for formulating a rehabilitation protocol following ACL surgery. For an athlete to return to competition, it is imperative that he or she regain muscular strength and neuromuscular control in their injured leg while maintaining static stability. In the past, rehabilitation programs attempted to prepare the athlete for return to sports by using resistance exercise alone. Current rehabilitation programs focus not only on strengthening exercises, but also on proprioceptive and neuromuscular control drills in order to provide a neurologic stimulus so that the athlete can regain the dynamic stability needed in athletic competition. We believe that it is important to use this approach not only possible causes that might predispose the individual to future injury.