Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement

Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT

PURPOSE

To reveal the relationship between anatomically placed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft and the intercondylar roof using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients undergoing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed with two femoral tunnels (antero-medial; AM and postero-lateral; PL) and two tibial tunnels. Hamstring autograft was used in all cases. Six to eight weeks after operation and when the subjects had obtained full extension of the knee, 3D-CT was performed with full knee extension. In the 3D-CT, the ACL graft was also reconstructed and visualized three dimensionally. Tunnel placement was evaluated with 3D-CT and intra-operative radiographs. The extension angle of the knee was also evaluated with 3D-CT.

RESULTS

No intercondylar roof impingement was observed. In 12 subjects, the ACL graft touched the roof (Touch group) but no graft deformation was observed. In 12 subjects, no roof-graft contact was observed (Non-touch group). No significant difference in femoral and tibial tunnel placement was observed between the Touch and Non-touch groups. All subjects attained full knee extension.

CONCLUSION

We believe that 3D-CT is an effective means of evaluating impingement after ACL reconstruction. For the clinical relevance, when the grafts are positioned in an anatomical fashion, there is no risk of impingement, and surgeons can perform anatomical double-bundle ACL as an impingement-free reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Case control study).

Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel drilling through anteromedial portal: axial plane drill angle affects tunnel length

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to correlate femoral tunnel length with axial drilling angle through the anteromedial portal.

METHODS

Ten anatomically correct Sawbones knee models (Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA) were used for this study. With the knee flexed to 120°, tunnels were drilled through a simulated anterior medial portal with a custom outrigger guide. The guide provided consistently reproducible drilling angles of 20°, 40°, and 60° in the axial plane. Femoral tunnel lengths were recorded for each knee at each drilling angle. A 1-way analysis of variance (α = .05) was conducted to compare tunnel length in the 3 groups. Multiple comparisons were conducted by use of a Tukey post hoc test.

RESULTS

The mean femoral tunnel lengths at 20°, 40°, and 60° were 37.0 mm, 36.9 mm, and 32.3 mm, respectively. The tunnels drilled at 20° and 40° were significantly longer than the 60° group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that drilling femoral tunnels through an anteromedial portal at an axial angle of 20° or 40° produces longer femoral tunnels than with an axial drilling angle of 60°.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

On the basis of this study, we recommend a 40° angle when approaching the lateral wall during femoral tunnel drilling through the anteromedial portal to optimize tunnel length while avoiding the acute angle and oblique entry of a 20° angle.

Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study

The objective of this study was to investigate the accurate AM and PL tunnel positions in an anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using human cadaver knees with an intact ACL. Fifteen fresh-frozen non-paired adult human knees with a median age of 60 were used. AM and PL bundles were identified by the difference in tension patterns. First, the center of femoral PL and AM bundles were marked with a K-wire and cut from the femoral insertion site. Next, each bundle was divided at the tibial side, and the center of each AM and PL tibial insertion was again marked with a K-wire. Tunnel placement was evaluated using a C-arm radiographic device. For the femoral side assessment, Bernard and Hertel's technique was used. For the tibial side assessment, Staubli's technique was used. After radiographic evaluations, all tibias' soft tissues were removed with a 10% NaOH solution, and tunnel placements were evaluated. In the radiographic evaluation, the center of the femoral AM tunnel was placed at 15% in a shallow-deep direction and at 26% in a high-low direction. The center of the PL bundle was found at 32% in a shallow-deep direction and 52% in a high-low direction. On the tibial side, the center of the AM tunnel was placed at 31% from the anterior edge of the tibia, and the PL tunnel at 50%. The ACL tibial footprint was placed close to the center of the tibia and was oriented sagittally. AM and PL tunnels can be placed in the ACL insertions without any coalition. The native ACL insertion site has morphological variety in both the femoral and tibial sides. This study showed, anatomically and radiologically, the AM and PL tunnel positions in an anatomical ACL reconstruction. We believe that this study will contribute to an accurate tunnel placement during ACL reconstruction surgery and provide reference data for postoperative radiographic evaluation.

Impingement pressure in the anatomical and nonanatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Although the literature has extensively discussed impingement after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the definition of impingement is vague, and impingement pressure has not been well investigated as a function of tunnel position.

PURPOSE

To determine the amount of impingement pressure between the ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and between the ACL and notch roof in the native ACL, the single-bundle ACL reconstruction with different tunnel placements, and the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen fresh-frozen nonpaired human cadaver knees were used. In each knee, different femoral and tibial tunnels were created, which allowed different graft placements. A single graft was placed in 3 positions: tibial anteromedial (AM) to femoral AM (anatomical), tibial posterolateral (PL) to femoral high AM (nonanatomical/mismatch), and tibial AM to femoral high AM. Double grafts were placed in an anatomical fashion (AM to AM and PL to PL). In each case, pressure-measuring films were inserted between the ACL and roof, the ACL and PCL, and the AM and PL bundles (for double-bundle group only). Knees were then moved with 40 N of force and from full flexion to full extension, and the pressure pattern on the film was analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with other groups, only the AM-high AM group showed significantly higher roof impingement pressure (P < .05). There was no significant difference in PCL impingement pressure between the intact ACL group and any of the reconstructed groups. No impingement pressure was observed between the grafts in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

This study evaluated the effect of different tunnel placements on the impingement pressure after ACL reconstruction. Anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction and nonanatomical tibial PL-femoral high AM ACL reconstruction do not cause roof, PCL, and interbundle impingement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons can perform the anatomical double-bundle ACL, anatomical single-bundle, and nonanatomical tibial PL-femoral high AM reconstructions as impingement-free reconstructions.

Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up

Drilling of the femoral tunnel with the transtibial (TT) technique is widely used in bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Recent studies suggest higher knee stability with the use of the anteromedial portal (AMP). The purpose of this study was to compare functional and clinical outcomes of BPTB ACL reconstruction using the TT or the AMP technique for drilling the femoral tunnel. All ACL reconstructions between January 2003 and April 2006 were approached for eligibility. Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria (21 TT group and 26 AMP group). Blinded assessments of IKDC score, knee stability and range of motion, one-leg hop test, mid-quadriceps circumference, VAS for satisfaction with surgery, Lysholm and Tegner scores, and SF-12 questionnaire were obtained for both groups. Data on preoperative and postoperative surgical timing were retrospectively reviewed through the charts. The AMP group demonstrated a significantly lower recovery time from surgery to walking without crutches (p < 0.01), to return to normal life (p < 0.03), to return jogging (p < 0.03), to return training (p < 0.03), and to return to play (p < 0.03). Knee stability values measured with KT-1000, Lachman test, pivot-shift sign, and objective IKDC score assessments were significantly better for the AMP compared to TT group (p < 0.002, p < 0.03, p < 0.02, p < 0.015, respectively). No differences were found for VAS for satisfaction with surgery, Lysholm, Tegner, and SF-12 between both groups. The use of the AMP technique significantly improved the anterior-posterior and rotational knee stability, IKDC scores, and recovery time from surgery compared to the TT technique.

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in anterior cruciate ligament grafts with and without autologous platelet-derived growth factors

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of platelet-rich plasma gel (PRPG) affects magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft during the first year after reconstruction.

METHODS

A prospective single-blinded study of 50 ACL reconstructions in 50 patients was performed. In group A (study group) PRPG was added to the graft with a standardized technique, and in group B (control group) no PRPG was added. An MRI study was performed postoperatively between 3 and 9 months in group A and between 3 and 12 months in group B. The imaging analysis was performed in a blind protocol by the same radiologist.

RESULTS

The mean heterogeneity score value at the time of MRI, assigned by the radiologist, was 1.14 in group A and 3.25 in group B. Both groups were comparable in terms of sex and age (P < .05). The mean time to obtain a completely homogeneous intra-articular segment in group A (PRPG added) was 177 days after surgery, and it was 369 days in group B. Using the quadratic predictive model, these findings show that group A (PRPG added) needed only 48% of the time group B required to achieve the same MRI image (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACL reconstruction with the use of PRPG achieves complete homogeneous grafts assessed by MRI, in 179 days compared with 369 days for ACL reconstruction without PRPG. This represents a time shortening of 48% with respect to ACL reconstruction without PRPG.

Grafted tendon healing in tibial tunnel is inferior to healing in femoral tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a histomorphometric study in rabbits

PURPOSE

This study aimed to test whether graft healing in the tibial tunnel was inferior to that in the femoral tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in rabbits.

METHODS

Surgical reconstruction by use of the digital extensor tendon in the bone tunnel was performed in 18 rabbits. The rabbits were killed at weeks 2, 6, and 12 postoperatively, with 6 at each time point, for histologic examination.

RESULTS

The transiently formed cartilaginous interface was gradually mineralized during re-establishment of direct tendon-to-bone integration, which was observed significantly less in the tibial tunnel than in the femoral tunnel (P < .05). The cell density of the graft was significantly lower in the tibial tunnel than that in the femoral tunnel at weeks 2 and 6 postoperatively (P < .05 for both). An increase in the immature type III collagen content was accompanied by a decrease in graft collagen fiber organization, with healing over time in both the femoral and tibial tunnels. The collagen fiber organization of the graft was significantly poorer in the tibial tunnel than that in the femoral tunnel at week 12 after surgery (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Grafted tendon healing in the tibial tunnel was inferior to that in the femoral tunnel at the tendon-to-bone interface and with regard to the grafted tendon within the bone tunnel after ACL reconstruction in rabbits.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Future biopsy study is desirable to test whether this observation was valid clinically, which might provide a scientific basis for therapeutic targets to improve the outcome of ACL surgery.

Influence of bone adaptation on tendon-to-bone healing in bone tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with placement of grafted tendon in bone tunnel is a common surgical procedure. Bone tunnel creation may result in stress shielding of postero-lateral regions of tibial tunnel. The present study was designed to characterize the changes of peri-graft bone and compare with tendon-to-bone (T-B) healing in spatial and temporal manners after ACL reconstruction in rabbit. Surgical reconstruction using digital extensor tendon in bone tunnel was performed on 48 rabbits. Twelve rabbits were sacrificed at 0, 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively for radiological and histological examinations. Bone mass and microarchitecture at the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral regions of tunnel wall at distal femur and proximal tibia were evaluated. Using peripheral quantitative computed tomography, a 26, 22, and 42% decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) relative to baseline was present in the medial region of the femoral tunnel and the posterior and lateral regions of the tibial tunnel, respectively, at week 12 postoperatively (p < 0.05). It was accompanied by a decrease in trabecular number and increase in trabecular spacing, the shift of platelike to rodlike trabeculae, and loss of anisotropy under micro-computed tomography evaluation. This finding was echoed by histology showing increased osteoclastic activities and poor T-B healing in these regions. In conclusion, the postoperative bone loss and associated poor T-B healing was region-dependent, which may result from adaptive changes after tunnel creation.

Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Optimal tunnel placement is critical in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructive surgery, yet the method used to drill the tunnels may compromise their placement.

HYPOTHESIS

An independent drilling method versus a conventional transtibial drilling method will place tunnels in different locations and produce reconstructions with different kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten pairs of knees had anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions produced by either a conventional transtibial drilling method or an independent drilling method. The location of the tunnels was recorded, and the knees were tested for laxity in the normal state, with the anterior cruciate ligament removed, and with the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed. A surgical navigation system guided the placement of the independently drilled tunnels and measured joint laxity in response to various combinations of anterior force and rotational torques.

RESULTS

The conventional transtibial drilling method used in this study placed tibial tunnels posterior and femoral tunnels superior relative to their footprints and resulted in more vertical grafts. In contrast, the independently drilled tibial and femoral tunnels were more anterior and central in their respective footprints, resulting in more horizontal grafts. The horizontal grafts of the independent drilling method were superior to the vertical grafts of this study's transtibial drilling method in restoring normal anterior and rotational knee laxity.

CONCLUSION

An independent drilling method can produce tunnels with superior function compared with tunnels produced by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions will be improved if grafts are centered in their anatomical insertions by an independent drilling method versus grafts placed by a conventional transtibial drilling method.

Graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon graft necessitates solid healing of the tendon graft in the bone tunnel. Improvement of graft healing to bone is crucial for facilitating an early and aggressive rehabilitation and ensuring rapid return to pre-injury levels activity. Tendon graft healing in a bone tunnel requires bone ingrowth into the tendon. Indirect Sharpey fiber formation and direct fibrocartilage fixation confer different anchorage strength and interface properties at the tendon-bone interface. For enhancing tendon graft-to-bone healing, we introduce a strategy that includes the use of periosteum, hydrogel supplemented with periosteal progenitor cells and bone morphogenetic protein-2, and a periosteal progenitor cell sheet. Future studies include the use of cytokines, gene therapy, stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and mechanical stress for tendon-to-bone healing. These strategies are currently under investigation, and will be applied in the clinical setting in the near future.

Intercondylar roof impingement pressure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a porcine model

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft impingement against the intercondylar roof has been postulated, but not thoroughly investigated. The roof impingement pressure changes with different tibial and femoral tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction. Anterior tibial translation is also affected by the tunnel positions of ACL reconstruction. The study design included a controlled laboratory study. In 15 pig knees, the impingement pressure between ACL and intercondylar roof was measured using pressure sensitive film before and after ACL single bundle reconstruction. ACL reconstructions were performed in each knee with two different tibial and femoral tunnel position combinations: (1) tibial antero-medial (AM) tunnel to femoral AM tunnel (AM to AM) and (2) tibial postero-lateral (PL) tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (PL to High-AM). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was evaluated after each ACL reconstruction using robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Neither the AM to AM nor the PL to High-AM ACL reconstruction groups showed significant difference when compared with intact ACL in roof impingement pressure. The AM to AM group had a significantly higher failure load than PL to High-AM group. This study showed how different tunnel placements affect the ACL-roof impingement pressure and anterior-posterior laxity in ACL reconstruction. Anatomical ACL reconstruction does not cause roof impingement and it has a biomechanical advantage in ATT when compared with non-anatomical ACL reconstructions in the pig knee. There is no intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon grafts

During a short period of time, surgical robots had been propagated for automated tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Clinical outcome data are currently unavailable. Between 2000 and 2003, 152 patients underwent ACL replacement with the assistance of the Computer Assisted Surgical Planning and Robotics system (CASPAR, OrtoMaquet, Germany) at our hospital. After minimal invasive pin placement in both the tibia and femur, computed tomography was used to register anatomical landmarks and to plan graft tunnel alignment. The robot was used to drill tibial and femoral tunnels in an outside-in fashion according to pre-operative planning. There was one procedure-specific Serious Adverse Event (i.e., an intraoperative transection of the posterior cruciate ligament). After IRB approval, all patients were invited for a follow-up examination. Data from 100 patients (35 women, 65 men, mean age 35 [SD 11] years, median follow-up 61 [range 42-77] months) form the basis of this report. Side-to-side differences in anterior laxity were measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Patient-centered outcomes included the Lysholm-Score, the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and the Short Form 36 (SF36). The mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.26] mm. Eight and five patients had a positive Lachman and pivot shift test, respectively. The Lysholm-Score averaged 86 (95% CI 83-89) points. Excellent, good, fair, and poor outcomes were reported by 38, 32, 20, and 10 patients. The LEFS averaged 85 (95% CI 82-88) points. The mean SF36 Physical Component Score was 48.4 (95% CI 46.5-50.3), indicating residual deficits compared to the population norm. All tibial graft tunnels did not cross the Blumensaat line, but were placed slightly anterior to the optimal center of 42% reported in previous studies. Compared to literature data, robot-assisted ACL reconstruction with BTB grafts may lead to higher knee stability, but poorer functional outcomes. The immense additional efforts with the procedure did not pay off in a benefit to patients.

Current status and potential of primary ACL repair

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture occurs in hundreds of thousands of active adolescents and young adults each year. Despite current treatment, posttraumatic osteoarthritis following these injuries is common in these young patients. Thus, there is widespread clinical and scientific interest in improving patient outcomes and preventing osteoarthritis. The current emphasis on the removal of the torn ACL and subsequent replacement with a tendon graft (ACL reconstruction) stems from adherence to a long-held and widely accepted doctrine that the ACL has only a limited healing response and, therefore, cannot heal or regenerate with suture repair. Recent work has shown that, despite an active biologic response in the ACL after injury, the two ends of the torn ligament never reconnect. Additional studies have detailed findings after placement of a substitute provisional scaffold in the wound site of the ACL injury to bridge the gap and initiate healing of the ruptured ligament after primary repair. This technique, called enhanced primary repair, has significant potential advantages over current ACL reconstruction techniques, including the preservation of the complex attachment sites and innervation of these structures, thus retaining much of the biomechanical and proprioceptive function of these tissues. This manuscript summarizes the recent in vitro and in vivo studies in the area of enhancing ACL healing using biologic supplementation. Subsequent work in this area may lead to the development of a novel approach to treat this important injury.

Laser-guided placement of the tibial guide in the transtibial technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, it is important to determine the location and direction of the femoral bone tunnel when using the transtibial technique. Accurately identifying the anatomic location at which to make the femoral bone tunnel for double-bundle ACL reconstruction is not a straightforward procedure. We describe a new method in which the centrum of the femoral tunnel is marked with an awl and a laser beam-guided technique is used to place the tibial pin. This procedure allows us to mark the desired location of the femoral tunnel before drilling the tibial bone tunnel when using the transtibial technique. This is the first report of a laser-guided technique used in arthroscopic surgery. We used a laser beam to determine the location of the femoral tunnel--the anatomic site needed to perform the intra-articular drilling in the tibia. In this technique, a laser pointer is set at the tibial guide, which reflects the laser beam and illuminates the point where the femoral bone tunnel should be made. Our method offers an easy and accurate way to reconfirm the tibial placement before drilling.

The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is presently evolving rapidly. In order to monitor the developments in surgical methods and clinical outcome, a national clinical database for knee ligament reconstructions was established in 2005 in Denmark. This study presents the first data with 2 year follow-up from the Danish ACL registry. All orthopaedic departments performing ACL reconstructions in Denmark, including private clinics, report to the registry. The database includes both surgery- and patient-related data. The surgeon reports anamnestic, objective knee laxity and operative data including graft and implant choices. At 1 year control, complications, reoperations, and objective knee laxity are recorded. The patient registers the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner function score preoperatively and at 1, 5 and 10 years follow-up. During the first 30 months, 5,872 knee-ligament reconstructions were registered. A total of 4,972 were primary ACL reconstructions, 443 were ACL revisions and 457 multiligament reconstructions. A total of 85% of all knee ligament reconstruction were reported to the database. A total of 71% of primary ACL reconstruction used hamstring tendon grafts and 21% used patella tendon graft. Meniscus injuries were treated in 35% of all patients. A total of 17% had significant cartilage lesions. At 2 years follow-up 3% of primary reconstructions were revised. Follow-up KOOS demonstrated specific differences between primary ACL, revision ACL, and multiligament reconstructions. Sports/recreation score were 40, 32, 28 and quality of life score were 40, 32, 33 for the respective groups. This study presents the first follow-up data from a national ACL registry. These data will become new international reference materials for outcome measures before and after ACL surgery. The database will enable future monitoring of ACL reconstruction techniques and outcome.

Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the locations of the anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the femur and tibia and visualization of these insertions during surgical reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomical insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament have relationships to bony landmarks of the tibia and femur.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric knees were scanned by computed tomography, reconstructed 3-dimensionally, and examined from simulated arthroscopic, sagittal, and axial perspectives. Volume-rendering software was used to document the relationship of the anterior cruciate ligament to the bony anatomy.

RESULTS

A bony ridge (Resident's Ridge) at the anterior border of the anterior cruciate ligament was readily noted on the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle. Superiorly, anterior cruciate ligament fibers inserted up to the roof of the notch and to 3 to 3.5 mm of the articular surface posteriorly and inferiorly. The anterior cruciate ligament inserted into a fovea anterior to the tibial eminence. Posteriorly, anterior cruciate ligament fibers inserted up to a ridge between the medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles. Medially, anterior cruciate ligament fibers inserted onto the ridge at the lateral border of the medial tibial condyle. There was no distinct anterior or lateral bony border with anterior cruciate ligament fibers blending into the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus.

CONCLUSION

The anterior border of the femoral anterior cruciate ligament origin is Resident's Ridge. The ridge between the medial and lateral intercondylar tubercles at the base of the tibial eminence is the posterior margin of the anterior cruciate ligament on the tibia.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Bony landmarks can be used to aid in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Reconstruction technique affects femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction

Grafts placed too anteriorly on the femur are reportedly a common cause of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Some studies suggest more anatomic femoral tunnel placement improves kinematics. The ability of the transtibial technique and a tibial tunnel-independent technique (placed transfemorally outside-in) to place the guide pin near the center of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament was compared in 12 cadavers. After arthroscopic placement of the guide pins, the femur was dissected and the three-dimensional geometry of the femur, anterior cruciate ligament footprint, and positions of each guide pin were measured. The transtibial guide-pin placement was 7.9 +/- 2.2 mm from the center of the footprint (near its anterior border), whereas the independent technique positioned the guide pin 1.9 +/- 1.0 mm from the center. The center of the footprint was within 2 mm of an anteroposterior line through the most posterior border of the femoral cartilage in the notch and a proximodistal line through the proximal margin of the cartilage at the capsular reflection. More accurate placement of the femoral tunnel might reduce the incidence of graft failure and might reduce long-term degeneration observed after reconstruction although both would require clinical confirmation.