Encoding le quattro stagioni within the mammalian brain: photoperiodic orchestration through the suprachiasmatic nucleus

Heterogeneous regulation of individual lactotroph cells by photoperiod in the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus)

In many mammals, changes in daylength (photoperiod) regulate multiple aspects of physiology, including the synthesis and secretion of the anterior pituitary hormone prolactin. Here, we tested the hypothesis that individual lactotroph cells exhibit a heterogeneous response to changes in photoperiod, by exploiting a recently developed assay for prolactin gene expression in single pars distalis (PD) cells. Male Syrian hamsters were exposed to either long (LD; 16 h light: 8 h dark) or short (SD; 8 h light: 16 h dark) photoperiods for 12 weeks. Response of the lactotrophic axis to photoperiod was confirmed by the significantly (P<0.01) lower plasma prolactin concentrations in SD than LD hamsters. Analysis of freshly dispersed PD cells by in situ hybridisation demonstrated that photoperiod has no effect (P>0.05) on the proportion of PD cells (approximately 25%) that expressed prolactin mRNA. Heterogeneity of prolactin mRNA expression was observed in both LD and SD. A similar proportion of cells expressed low levels of prolactin mRNA in both photoperiods, suggesting that they may be unresponsive to photoperiod change. In contrast, the remaining PD cells that expressed prolactin mRNA exhibited markedly increased gene expression in LD, consistent with the selective recruitment of a lactotroph subpopulation to a more transcriptionally active state in this photoperiod.

Differential responses of circadian activity onset and offset following GABA-ergic and opioid receptor activation

The circadian pacemaker in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei is responsive to photic and nonphotic stimuli. In the present study, the authors have investigated the response of activity onset and offset to application of nonphotic stimuli: the benzodiazepine midazolam and the opioid receptor agonist fentanyl. In correspondence with previous studies, both stimuli induced phase advances of the activity onset when given in the mid- to late subjective day. In contrast, activity offset did not phase advance following these injections. Injections during the early subjective day induced small phase delays of the activity onset, while large phase delays occurred in activity offset. Phase shifts, induced at both circadian time zones, were paralleled by an increase in the length of daily activity (alpha). The increase in a remained present during several days after the injection. The different kinetics in phase shifting of the activity onset and offset indicate complexity in phase-shifting behavior of the circadian pacemaker in response to nonphotic stimuli. Moreover, the data show responsiveness of the circadian system to GABA-ergic and opioid receptor activation, not only during the mid- to late subjective day but also during the early subjective day. The data implicate that the early subjective day is an interesting phase for analysis of molecular and biochemical processes involved in nonphotic phase shifting.

Generation of the melatonin endocrine message in mammals: a review of the complex regulation of melatonin synthesis by norepinephrine, peptides, and other pineal transmitters

Melatonin, the major hormone produced by the pineal gland, displays characteristic daily and seasonal patterns of secretion. These robust and predictable rhythms in circulating melatonin are strong synchronizers for the expression of numerous physiological processes in photoperiodic species. In mammals, the nighttime production of melatonin is mainly driven by the circadian clock, situated in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus, which controls the release of norepinephrine from the dense pineal sympathetic afferents. The pivotal role of norepinephrine in the nocturnal stimulation of melatonin synthesis has been extensively dissected at the cellular and molecular levels. Besides the noradrenergic input, the presence of numerous other transmitters originating from various sources has been reported in the pineal gland. Many of these are neuropeptides and appear to contribute to the regulation of melatonin synthesis by modulating the effects of norepinephrine on pineal biochemistry. The aim of this review is firstly to update our knowledge of the cellular and molecular events underlying the noradrenergic control of melatonin synthesis; and secondly to gather together early and recent data on the effects of the nonadrenergic transmitters on modulation of melatonin synthesis. This information reveals the variety of inputs that can be integrated by the pineal gland; what elements are crucial to deliver the very precise timing information to the organism. This also clarifies the role of these various inputs in the seasonal variation of melatonin synthesis and their subsequent physiological function.

Evidence for an endogenous per1- and ICER-independent seasonal timer in the hamster pituitary gland

Most mammals use changing annual day-length cycles to regulate pineal melatonin secretion and thereby drive many physiological rhythms including reproduction, metabolism, immune function, and pelage. Prolonged exposure to short winter day lengths results in refractoriness, a spontaneous reversion to long-day physiological status. Despite its critical role in the timing of seasonal rhythms, refractoriness remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was therefore to describe cellular and molecular mechanisms driving the seasonal secretion of a key hormone, prolactin, in refractory Syrian hamsters. We used recently developed single cell hybridization and reporter assays to show that this process is initiated by timed reactivation of endocrine signaling from the pars tuberalis (PT) region of the pituitary gland, a well-defined melatonin target site, causing renewed activation of prolactin gene expression. This timed signaling is independent of per1 clock gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and PT and of melatonin secretion, which continue to track day length. Within the PT, there is also a continued short day-like profile of ICER expression, suggesting that the change in hormone secretion is independent of cAMP signaling. Our data thus identify the PT as a key anatomical structure involved in endogenous seasonal timing mechanisms, which breaks from prevailing day length-induced gene expression.

Clock gene daily profiles and their phase relationship in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus are affected by photoperiod

Rhythmicity of the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), a site of the circadian pacemaker, is affected by daylength; that is, by the photoperiod. Whereas various markers of rhythmicity have been followed, so far there have been no studies on the effect of the photoperiod on the expression of the clock genes in the rat SCN. To fill the gap and to better understand the photoperiodic modulation of the SCN state, rats were maintained either under a long photoperiod with 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness per day (LD16:8) or under a short LD8:16 photoperiod, and daily profiles of Per1, Cry1, Bmal1 and Clock mRNA in darkness were assessed by in situ hybridization method. The photoperiod affected phase, waveform, and amplitude of the rhythmic gene expression as well as phase relationship between their profiles. Under the long period, the interval of elevated Per1 mRNA lasted for a longer and that of elevated Bmal1 mRNA for a shorter time than under the short photoperiod. Under both photoperiods, the morning and the daytime Per1 and Cry1 mRNA rise as well as the morning Bmal1 mRNA decline were closely linked to the morning light onset. Amplitude of Per1, Cry1, and Bmal1 mRNA rhythms was larger under the short than under the long photoperiod. Also, under the short photoperiod, the daily Clock mRNA profile exhibited a significant rhythm. Altogether, the data indicate that the whole complex molecular clockwork in the rat SCN is photoperiod dependent and hence may differ according to the season of the year.

Plasticity of hamster circadian entrainment patterns depends on light intensity

The multiple oscillatory basis of the mammalian circadian pacemaker is adduced by, among other phenomena, the occurrence of split locomotor activity rhythms in rodents after prolonged exposure to constant light. More recently, split rhythms entrained to a 24h light:dark:light:dark cycle have been documented following scheduled access of hamsters to a novel running wheel or by photoperiod manipulations alone. Because the incidence of constant light-induced splitting depends on light intensity, the role of this variable was assessed in this new splitting paradigm. Male Syrian hamsters, entrained to a 14h light:10h dark cycle, were transferred to individual running wheel cages 7h after light onset. Transfer coincided with the beginning of the scotophase of a new photocycle alternating between 5h of relative dark and 7h of light. For four weeks bright photophases (approximately 350 lux) were alternated with either dim (< 0.1 lux) or completely dark (0 lux) scotophases. An additional group received moderate intensity photophases (approximately 45 lux) paired with dim scotophase illumination. For an additional four weeks, all hamsters were exposed to the same bright:dim light:dark cycle. Dim light in the scotophase significantly increased the incidence of split activity rhythms relative to that observed with completely dark scotophases. Overall wheel-running rates and activity induced by a cage change were also increased in dim light-exposed animals. Group differences largely disappeared four weeks later when hamsters previously maintained in completely dark scotophases were exposed to dim scotophases. Photophase light intensity did not affect the overall incidence of splitting, but influenced the timing of activity in the afternoon scotophase. The effects of dim illumination may be mediated in part via enhanced locomotor responses to transfer to a new cage or by changes in coupling interactions between component oscillators.

Changes in the 5-HT2A receptor system in the pre-mammillary hypothalamus of the ewe are related to regulation of LH pulsatile secretion by an endogenous circannual rhythm

BACKGROUND

We wanted to determine if changes in the expression of serotonin 2A receptor (5HT2A receptor) gene in the premammillary hypothalamus are associated with changes in reproductive neuroendocrine status. Thus, we compared 2 groups of ovariectomized-estradiol-treated ewes that expressed high vs low LH pulsatility in two different paradigms (2 groups per paradigm): (a) refractoriness (low LH secretion) or not (high LH secretion) to short days in pineal-intact Ile-de-France ewes (RSD) and (b) endogenous circannual rhythm (ECR) in free-running pinealectomized Suffolk ewes in the active or inactive stage of their reproductive rhythm.

RESULTS

In RSD ewes, density of 5HT2A receptor mRNA (by in situ hybridization) was significantly higher in the high LH group (25.3 +/- 1.4 vs 21.4 +/- 1.5 grains/neuron, P < 0.05) and 3H-Ketanserin binding (a specific radioligand) of the median part of the premammillary hypothalamus tended to be higher in the high group (29.1 +/- 4.0 vs 24.6 +/- 4.2 fmol/mg tissu-equivalent; P < 0.10). In ECR ewes, density of 5HT2A receptor mRNA and 3H-Ketanserin binding were both significantly higher in the high LH group (20.8 +/- 1.6 vs 17.0 +/- 1.5 grains/neuron, P < 0.01, and 19.7 +/- 5.0 vs 7.4 +/- 3.4 fmol/mg tissu-equivalent; P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that these higher 5HT2A receptor gene expression and binding activity of 5HT2A receptor in the premammillary hypothalamus are associated with stimulation of LH pulsatility expressed before the development of refractoriness to short days and prior to the decline of reproductive neuroendocrine activity during expression of the endogenous circannual rhythm.

A neural clockwork for encoding circadian time

Many daily biological rhythms are governed by an innate timekeeping mechanism or clock. Endogenous, temperature-compensated circadian clocks have been localized to discrete sites within the nervous systems of a number of organisms. In mammals, the master circadian pacemaker is the bilaterally paired suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the anterior hypothalamus. The SCN is composed of multiple single cell oscillators that must synchronize to each other and the environmental light schedule. Other tissues, including those outside the nervous system, have also been shown to express autonomous circadian periodicities. This review examines 1) how intracellular regulatory molecules function in the oscillatory mechanism and in its entrainment to environmental cycles; 2) how individual SCN cells interact to create an integrated tissue pacemaker with coherent metabolic, electrical, and secretory rhythms; and 3) how such clock outputs are converted into temporal programs for the whole organism.

Mammalian photoperiodic system: formal properties and neuroendocrine mechanisms of photoperiodic time measurement

Photoperiodism is a process whereby organisms are able to use both absolute measures of day length and the direction of day length change as a basis for regulating seasonal changes in physiology and behavior. The use of day length cues allows organisms to essentially track time-of-year and to "anticipate" relatively predictable annual variations in important environmental parameters. Thus, adaptive types of seasonal biological changes can be molded through evolution to fit annual environmental cycles. Studies of the formal properties of photoperiodic mechanisms have revealed that most organisms use circadian oscillators to measure day length. Two types of paradigms, designated as the external and internal coincidence models, have been proposed to account for photoperiodic time measurement by a circadian mechanism. Both models postulate that the timing of light exposure, rather than the total amount of light, is critical to the organism's perception of day length. In mammals, a circadian oscillator(s) in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus receives photic stimuli via the retinohypothalamic tract. The circadian system regulates the rhythmic secretion of the pineal hormone, melatonin. Melatonin is secreted at night, and the duration of secretion varies in inverse relation to day length; thus, photoperiod information is "encoded" in the melatonin signal. The melatonin signal is presumably "decoded" in melatonin target tissues that are involved in the regulation of a variety of seasonal responses. Variations in photoperiodic response are seen not only between species but also between breeding populations within a species and between individuals within single breeding populations. Sometimes these variations appear to be the result of differences in responsiveness to melatonin; in other cases, variations in photoperiod responsiveness may depend on differences in patterns of melatonin secretion related to circadian variation. Sites of action for melatonin in mammals are not yet well characterized, but potential targets of particular interest include the pars tuberalis of the pituitary gland and the suprachiasmatic nuclei. Both these sites exhibit uptake of radiolabeled melatonin in various species, and there is some evidence for direct action of melatonin at these sites. However, it appears that there are species differences with respect to the importance and specific functions of various melatonin target sites.

Of rodents and ungulates and melatonin: creating a uniform code for darkness by different signaling mechanisms

Melatonin synthesis in the mammalian pineal gland is one of the best investigated output pathways of the circadian clock because it can be readily measured and is tightly regulated by a clearly defined input, the neurotransmitter norepinephrine. In this system, a regulatory scenario was deciphered that is centered around the cyclic AMP pathway but shows peculiar species-specific differences. In rodents, the cyclic AMP-mediated, temporally sequential up-regulation of two transcription factors, the activator CREB (cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein) and the inhibitor ICER (inducible cyclic AMP-dependent early repressor), is the core mechanism to determine rhythmic accumulation of the mRNA encoding for the rate-limiting enzyme in melatonin synthesis, the arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT). Thus, in rodents, the regulation of melatonin synthesis bears an essential transcriptional component, which, however, is flanked by posttranscriptional mechanisms. In contrast, in ungulates, and possibly also in primates, AA-NAT appears to be regulated exclusively on the posttranscriptional level. Here, increasing cyclic AMP levels inhibit the breakdown of constitutively synthesized AA-NAT protein by proteasomal proteolysis, leading to an elevated enzyme activity. Thus, self-restriction of cellular responses, as a reaction to external cues, is accomplished by different mechanisms in pinealocytes of different mammalian species. In such a temporally gated cellular adaptation, transcriptionally active products of clock genes may play a supplementary role. Their recent detection in the endogenously oscillating nonmammalian pineal organ and, notably, also in the slave oscillator of the mammalian pineal gland underlines that the mammalian pineal gland will continue to serve as an excellent model system to understand mechanisms of biological timing.

Biology of mammalian photoperiodism and the critical role of the pineal gland and melatonin

In mammals, photoperiodic information is transformed into a melatonin secretory rhythm in the pineal gland (high levels at night, low levels during the day). Melatonin exerts its effects in discrete hypothalamic areas, most likely through MT1 melatonin receptors. Whether melatonin is brought to the hypothalamus from the cerebrospinal fluid or the blood is still unclear. The final action of this indoleamine at the level of the central nervous system is a modulation of GnRH secretion but it does not act directly on GnRH neurones; rather, its action involves a complex neural circuit of interneurones that includes at least dopaminergic, serotoninergic and aminoacidergic neurones. In addition, this network appears to undergo morphological changes between seasons.

Photoperiodism in humans and other primates: evidence and implications

Most of the anatomical and molecular substrates of the system that encodes changes in photoperiod in the duration of melatonin secretion, and the receptor molecules that read this signal, have been shown to be conserved in monkeys and humans, and the functions of this system appear to be intact from the level of the retina to the level of the melatonin-duration signal of change of season. While photoperiodic seasonal breeding has been shown to occur in monkeys, it remains unclear whether photoperiod and mediation of photoperiod's effects by melatonin influence human reproduction. Epidemiological evidence suggests that inhibition of fertility by heat in men in summer contributes to seasonal variation in human reproduction at lower latitudes and that stimulation of fertility by lengthening of the photoperiod in spring contributes to the variation at higher latitudes. Parallels between the seasonality of human reproduction and seasonal affective disorder suggest that they may be governed by common biological processes. Historical and experimental evidence indicates that human responses to seasonal changes in the natural photoperiod may have been more robust prior to the Industrial Revolution and that subsequently they have been increasingly suppressed by alterations of the physical environment.