Abduction stress and AP weightbearing radiography of purely ligamentous injury in the tarsometatarsal joint

Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: current treatment and new surgical approaches

Anatomic reduction and restoration of the acute or chronic fracture-dislocation of the tarso-metatarsal joint is essential and needs to be addressed early in the patient's treatment with internal or external fixation. Long-term results following this injury can be associated with chronic instability, posttraumatic arthrosis, and poor functional outcomes. In this article, the authors review the current treatments of internal fixation and introduce new surgical techniques for addressing the acute or chronic tarso-metatarsal injuries with the application of circular multiplane external fixation devices.

Treatment of the missed Lisfranc injury

Lisfranc joint injuries may be missed at the time of occurrence potentially leading to persistent instability, deformity, or arthritis. In the absence of significant residual arthritis or fixed deformity, delayed open reduction and internal fixation with or without reconstruction of the Lisfranc ligament may be performed. An alternative is reduction and primary arthrodesis of the relatively immobile medial tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints. In the presence of significant residual arthritis or fixed deformity that is recalcitrant to conservative treatment, arthrodesis, including correction of deformity, is the treatment of choice for the first, second, and third TMT joints. Resection arthroplasty of the fourth and fifth TMT joints may be preferable to arthrodesis in order to maintain physiologic motion.

Your diagnosis? Midfoot sprain: Lisfranc ligament disruption

Suspected midfoot sprains can be a challenge to evaluate when the initial weight-bearing views are normal. In this case, MRI allowed prompt confirmation of the suspected unstable Lisfranc ligament injury and contributed to prompt management with rigid fixation.

Sports and performing arts medicine. 4. traumatic injuries in sports11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated

This self-directed learning module focuses on injuries often seen in contact sports. It includes information on trauma to the cervical spine, wrist, shoulder, knee, ankle, foot, and chest and also discusses concussion in sport. It is part of the study guide on sports and performing arts medicine in the Self-Directed Physiatric Education Program for practitioners and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation. This article specifically focuses on the etiology, differential diagnoses, treatment, and return-to-play criteria for traumatic sports injuries.

OVERALL ARTICLE OBJECTIVE

To summarize the approach to common traumatic sports injuries.

Injury to the tarsometatarsal joint complex

Tarsometatarsal joint complex fracture-dislocations may result from direct or indirect trauma. Direct injuries are usually the result of a crush and may involve associated compartment syndrome, significant soft-tissue injury, and open fracture-dislocation. Indirect injuries are often the result of an axial load to the plantarflexed foot. Midfoot pain after even a minor forefoot injury should raise suspicion; up to 20% of tarsometatarsal joint complex injuries are missed on initial examination. An anteroposterior radiograph with abduction stress may reveal subtle injury, but computed tomography is the preferred imaging modality. The goal of treatment is the restoration of a pain-free, functional foot. The preferred treatment is open reduction and internal fixation, using screw fixation for the medial three rays and Kirschner wires for the fourth and fifth tarsometatarsal joints. Satisfactory outcome can be expected in approximately 90% of patients.

Classification, investigation, and management of midfoot sprains: Lisfranc injuries in the athlete

BACKGROUND

Midfoot sprains in athletes represent a spectrum of injuries to the Lisfranc ligament complex, from partial sprains with no displacement to complete tears with frank diastasis. Treatment of these injuries varies from the treatment of high-velocity injuries seen in nonathletes.

PURPOSE

We wanted to report the outcome of treatment in athletes with Lisfranc injuries classified according to our system.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Weightbearing radiographs and bone scintigrams were used to diagnose midfoot sprains in 15 athletes who were treated surgically or nonoperatively according to the following classification: nonoperative management for stage I injuries (undisplaced) and anatomic reduction with fixation for stage II (diastasis with no arch height loss) and stage III (diastasis with arch height loss) injuries.

RESULTS

We achieved an excellent outcome in 93% of 15 athletes with midfoot sprains at an average follow-up of 27 months (range, 9 to 72).

CONCLUSIONS

Weightbearing radiographs and bone scintigrams are sensitive, reproducible, and relatively inexpensive methods of investigation of these injuries. Restoration and maintenance of the anatomic alignment of the Lisfranc joint is the key to appropriate treatment of injury to the midfoot.

Plantar-flexion tarsometatarsal joint injuries in children

We are reporting a series of eight patients ranging in age from 3 to 10 years who sustained plantar-flexion injuries of the foot, resulting in injuries to the tarsometatarsal (TMT) interval. All injuries were identified within 3 days and treated with molded short leg immobilization. We evaluated all patients an average of 32 months after injury with physical examination and the Midfoot Functional Rating (MFR) score. Seven patients had no limitations in their activities of daily living or athletic endeavors. These seven patients had MFR scores of 100. One patient had complaints of midfoot pain with running for >5 min and radiographic evidence of degenerative changes across the TMT interval at 3-year follow-up. These results suggest that although indirect pediatric TMT injuries have a generally favorable prognosis, early degenerative changes can occur and may be responsible for chronic pain and activity limitation. Degenerative changes in this weight-bearing region in a young patient can have lifelong implications. Patients and parents may benefit from discussion of the potential for future midfoot compromise following this injury.

Ligamentous restraints of the second tarsometatarsal joint: a biomechanical evaluation

Ligamentous injury of the tarsometatarsal joint complex is an uncommon, but disabling condition that frequently occurs in elite athletes. There are few options for managing these injuries, in part because the relative mechanical contribution of the ligaments of the tarsometatarsal joint is unknown, complicating decisions regarding which ligaments need reconstruction. In the current study, strength and stiffness of the dorsal, plantar, and Lisfranc ligaments of 20 paired cadaver feet were measured and compared. The plantar and Lisfranc ligaments were significantly stiffer and stronger than the dorsal ligament, and the Lisfranc ligament was significantly stronger and stiffer than the plantar ligament.

Developments and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of injuries to the tarsometatarsal joint

Continued research and clinical advances have allowed clinicians to diagnose injuries of the tarsometatarsal joint earlier and with greater precision than in previous eras and have promoted refinements of the surgical procedures used in their treatment. For patients with such injuries, these advances should result in improved function and a substantial decrease in morbidity.

Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and internal fixation has been recommended as the treatment for most unstable injuries of the Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal) joint. It has been thought that purely ligamentous injuries have a poor outcome despite such surgical management.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent open reduction and screw fixation of a Lisfranc injury in a seven-year period. Among ninety-two adults treated for that injury, forty-eight patients with forty-eight injuries were followed for an average of fifty-two months (range, thirteen to 114 months). Fifteen injuries were purely ligamentous, and thirty-three were combined ligamentous and osseous. Patient outcome was assessed with use of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and the long-form Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) score.

RESULTS

The average AOFAS midfoot score was 77 points (on a scale of 0 to 100 points, with 100 points indicating an excellent outcome), with patients losing points for mild pain, decreased recreational function, and orthotic requirements. The average MFA score was 19 points (on a scale of 0 to 100 points, with 0 points indicating an excellent outcome), with patients losing points because of problems with "leisure activities" and difficulties with "life changes and feelings due to the injury." Twelve patients (25 percent) had posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints, and six of them required arthrodesis. The major determinant of a good result was anatomical reduction (p = 0.05). The subgroup of patients with purely ligamentous injury showed a trend toward poorer outcomes despite anatomical reduction and screw fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the concept that stable anatomical reduction of fracture-dislocations of the Lisfranc joint leads to the best long-term outcomes as patients so treated have less arthritis as well as better AOFAS midfoot scores.