A Systematic Review of the Outcome Evaluation Tools for the Foot and Ankle

Cartilage Matrix Changes in Hindfoot Joints in Chronic Ankle Instability Patients After Anatomic Repair Using T2-Mapping: Initial Experience With 3-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Anatomic repair is widely accepted as the primary surgical treatment for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). T2-mapping is a powerful tool for quantitative assessment of biochemical changes in cartilage matrix.

PURPOSE

To longitudinally evaluate cartilage matrix changes in the hindfoot joints of CLAI patients before and after anatomic repair by using T2-mapping with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-two CLAI patients (males/females = 20/12) and 21 healthy controls (males/females = 13/7).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3 T; sagittal multi-echo spin-echo technique (T2-mapping), coronal, sagittal, and axial spin-echo PD-FS, and sagittal T1WI sequences.

ASSESSMENT

MRI examinations were performed in CLAI patients at baseline (prior to surgery) and 3 years after anatomic repair and in healthy controls. On T2-maps, the hindfoot joints were segmented into 16 cartilage subregions. The T2 value of each subregion was measured. All patients were evaluated with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale at baseline and after surgery.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test were used. The differences corresponding to P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

At baseline, the T2 values in most cartilage subregions of talar dome and medial posterior subtalar joint (pSTJ) were higher in CLAI patients than in healthy controls. After surgery, only the T2 value of anteriomedial talar dome decreased from that at baseline (31.11 ± 3.88 msec vs. 34.27 ± 5.30 msec). The T2 values of other subregions with elevated T2 values remained higher than healthy controls. There were no significant differences in T2 values in the midtarsal joints between CLAI patients and healthy controls (P = 0.262, 0.104, 0.169, 0.103). Postoperatively, the patients' AOFAS scores improved significantly from 67.81 to 89.13.

DATA CONCLUSION

CLAI patients exhibited elevated T2 values in most subregions of talar dome and medial pSTJ. After anatomic repair, although the patients exhibited good clinical outcomes, the elevated T2 values could not be fully recovered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 4.

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for chondral defects of the talus: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Chondral defects of the talus are common and their treatment is challenging.

SOURCE OF DATA

Recent published literatures.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Membrane-induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (mACI) and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) have been proposed as management for chondral defects of the talus.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

It is debated whether AMIC provides greater outcomes compared to mACI for chondral regeneration. Several clinical studies showed controversial results, and the best treatment has not yet been clarified.

GROWING POINTS

To investigate whether AMIC provide superior outcomes than mACI at midterm follow-up.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

AMIC exhibits similar clinical results to mACI. However, AMIC involves one single surgical procedure, no articular cartilage harvest and hence no morbidity from it, no need for chondrocyte expansion in a separate laboratory setting. For these reasons, AMIC may be preferred to mACI.

Timeline for maximal subjective outcome improvement following total ankle arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Maximal medical improvement (MMI) establishes the timepoint when patients no longer experience clinically significant improvements following surgery. The purpose of this investigation is to establish when patients achieve MMI following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) through the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

A systematic review to identify studies on TAA which reported consecutive PROMs for two years postoperatively was performed. Pooled analysis was done at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. Clinically significant improvement was defined as improvement between time intervals exceeding the minimal clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Twelve studies and 1514 patients met inclusion criteria. Clinically significant improvement was seen up to 6 months postoperatively in both the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle Hindfoot Score and Visual Analog Scale scoring systems. The Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Dysfunction and Bother subsections showed maximal clinically significant improvement by 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Following TAA, MMI is seen by one year postoperatively. Physicians may allocate the majority of resources within the first year when most of the improvement is perceived. This data may help inform preoperative counseling as it establishes a timeline for MMI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications Following Limited Open Achilles Repair Without an Instrumented Guide

BACKGROUND

We report the clinical outcomes and complications following our limited open incision Achilles tendon repair technique without instrument guides.

METHODS

A total of 33 patients were included in this study. We recorded pre- and postoperative scores on the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), visual analog scale (VAS), and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Subgroup analyses were performed for acute (<2 weeks) and subacute (2-6 weeks) Achilles tendon repairs. A P value <.05 was considered significant for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The median time from injury to surgery was 10.0 days (range, 1-45 days). At a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 1.0-9.8 years), the average pre- and postoperative outcome scores improved significantly for the following: FADI index (49.1-98.4, P < .001), VAS (4.8-0.2, P < .001), FAOS Pain (54.8-99.2, P < .001), FAOS Symptoms (84.6-97.0, P < .001), FAOS activities of daily living (61.4-97.2, P < .001), FAOS Sports and Recreational Activity (39.5-98.5, P < .001), and FAOS quality of life (39.7-88.7, P < .001). There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative outcome scores between the acute and subacute Achilles repair groups. There were no wound complication, reruptures, or reoperations in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients showed improvements in postoperative patient-reported outcome scores with minimal complications. There was no significant difference in outcomes for acute vs subacute repairs. Our limited open incision Achilles tendon repair, which required no additional targeting instrumentation, had favorable midterm results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish-French versions of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS)

OBJECTIVE

The study aim was to cross-culturally adapt the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) into Spanish and French-language versions, to validate them and to evaluate their psychometric properties.

METHODS

The cross-cultural translation from the original SEFAS into French and Spanish was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the ISPOR. The participants were recruited from some private healthcare institutions in France and Sapin, from June to August 2019. The following inclusion criteria were applied: aged at least 18 years, with foot and/or ankle deformity, had a history of subtalar and/or ankle and/or talonavicular or hindfoot pain, did not make daily use of walking aids, and were able to achieve the normal range of motions in the ankle, subtalar and midtarsal joints. All patients gave signed informed consent and completed the SF-36 and SEFAS questionnaires in the Spanish or French version.

RESULTS

The analysis was based on 319 participants. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha values of 0.94 for the Spanish version and 0.88 for the French version). No floor/ceiling effect was observed in any item, in either version.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish and French versions of SEFAS are valid, reliable instruments for evaluating foot and ankle pain and function.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSelf-report questionnaires specific to patients with rheumatoid arthritis are needed to assess the degree of pain, disability, and disability caused by foot problems.The Spanish and French versions of SEFAS show the necessary psychometric characteristics.Each version provides a valid, reliable tool ensuring the correct evaluation of pain, function and limitation of function in the foot and/or ankle in the target population.

Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint

PURPOSE

The main aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between radiographic findings and clinical outcomes following the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis.

METHODS

In a comparative retrospective study, on 46 patients (48 ft), the correlation between post-operative radiographic findings including hallux valgus angle (HVA) and first MTP dorsiflexion angle (MTPDA) and clinical outcomes including VAS pain, modified AOFAS hallux score, and FFI questionnaire were evaluated. Moreover, clinical outcomes were compared between cases with pre-operative diagnosis of first MTP inflammatory arthritis, hallux valgus, hallux varus, and grade 3 and 4 of hallux rigidus. The effect of first MTP arthrodesis on Meary's angle and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were found out.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 56.3 ± 9.1 (range, 29-69) years, including 42 (91.3%) females and 4 (8.7%) males. We had fusion rate of 97.9%, one asymptomatic nonunion case (2.1%). Totally, mean scores of modified AOFAS hallux score, FFI percentage, and VAS pain were 88.9 ± 12.6, 9.4 ± 16.5, and 1.23 ± 2.24, respectively. Hallux varus was associated with the most favourable outcomes; whereas, patients with first MTP arthritis got the worst outcome. Regression analysis test between clinical outcomes and HVA > 15° and first MTPDA >15° showed correlation coefficient of almost zero. No statistically significant differences were found between the clinical outcomes of grade 3 and 4 of hallux rigidus (p value of modified AOFAS hallux score, FFI percentage, and VAS pain: 0.879, 0.906, and 0.298, respectively). Mean of HVA and IMA reduction in 15 hallux valgus underwent first MTP fusion were 34.4° and 8.4°, respectively. Meary's angle increased about 4° with statistically significant difference (p value 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with first MTP fusion > 15° in coronal and transverse plans could have acceptable clinical outcomes. The clinical outcome of first MTP arthrodesis for grade 3 hallux rigidus is comparable with grade 4. First MTP fusion would have positive effect on IMA and Meary's angle.

Does the Method of Administration Affect Reliability of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure?

BACKGROUND

Region-specific patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly used in rehabilitation medicine. Digital versions of PROs may be implemented into electronic medical records and are also commonly used in research, but the validity of this method of administration (MOA) must be established.

PURPOSE

To determine the agreement between and compare the test-retest reliability of a paper version (FAAM-P) and digital version (FAAM-D) of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, nonblinded, crossover observational study.

METHODS

A total of 90 adults were randomized to complete the FAAM-P or FAAM-D first, and then completed the second MOA (first day [D1]). The FAAM-D was a digital adaptation of both FAAM-P subscales on Qualtrics. Identical test procedures were completed 1 week later (D2). Data were removed if a participant scored 100% on both MOA, reported injury between D1 and D2, or did not complete both MOA. Agreement was assessed on 46 participants between the 2 MOA using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) at D1. There was good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for the FAAM activities of daily living.

RESULTS

The authors observed good agreement between the FAAM-P and FAAM-D for the activities of daily living (ICC = .88) and sport scales (ICC = .87). Test-retest reliability was good-to-excellent for the FAAM activities of daily living (FAAM-P: ICC = .87; FAAM-D: ICC = .89) and sport (FAAM-P: ICC = .71; FAAM-D: ICC = .91).

CONCLUSIONS

The MOA does not appear to affect the responses on the FAAM; however, the authors observed slightly higher reliability on the FAAM-D. The FAAM-D is sufficient to be used for generating practice-based evidence in rehabilitation medicine.

Donor-Site Morbidity after Fibula Transplantation in Head and Neck Tumor Patients: A Split-Leg Retrospective Study with Focus on Leg Stability and Quality of Life

The free fibula flap has been one of the most important microvascular grafts for orofacial reconstruction for more than 30 years. The complication rates at the donor-site reported in literature are considered to be low, but the published data vary greatly in some cases. In particular, restrictions in the stability and balance of the involved leg and their effects on the quality of life have been described very inconsistently to date. Therefore, this study mainly focuses on the stability and balance of the affected leg in a split-leg design. Between December 2014 and January 2018, out of 119 subjects who underwent mainly jaw ablative tumor surgery and reconstruction using a fibula flap, 68 subjects were examined for donor site morbidity. Besides reporting general types of complications, two specific test procedures were used. The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) as a practical test for ankle function and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) as a questionnaire in order to assess quality of life, depending on the lower leg function. SEBT revealed an average of 55.3 cm with the operated leg as the supporting leg, which corresponds to 95.5% of 57.9 cm achieved with the healthy leg as the supporting leg. An average FADI score of 89.4% was recorded. SEBT and FADI seem to be suitable methods of examination for subjects post fibular transplantation and pointed out minimal limitations of the involved legs in comparison to the unaffected legs. These limitations were clinically not relevant and they had minor influence on the subjects' quality of life and their daily activities.

Comparison of Generic, Musculoskeletal-Specific, and Foot and Ankle-Specific Outcome Measures Over Time in Tibial Plafond Fractures

BACKGROUND

This study performed a psychometric analysis assessing and comparing the responsiveness of the relevant components of a generic (Short Form-36 [SF36]), a musculoskeletal-specific (Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment [SMFA]), and a foot and ankle-specific (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS]) outcome score when evaluating surgically treated tibial plafond fractures over time.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients were followed for 12 months after their tibial plafond fracture. Responsiveness, or the ability to detect clinical change in a disease, was evaluated through the standardized response mean (SRM), the proportion meeting a minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and floor and ceiling effects.

RESULTS

The SRM of the SF36-Physical Component Summary (PCS) was significantly greater than the SMFA-dysfunction index (DI) (P < .01) and FAOS-Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (P = .01) between baseline and 6 months, whereas the SRMs of only SF36-PCS and FAOS-ADL differed (P = .01) between 6 and 12 months. The proportion of patients achieving an MCID for SF36-PCS was higher than FAOS-ADL (P = .03) between baseline and 6 months and higher than SMFA-DI (P = .04) between 6 and 12 months. The FAOS-ADL showed substantial ceiling effects at baseline (88.2%) but much less at 6 months (5.9%) and 12 months (9.8%). Smaller ceiling effects were observed for the SMFA-DI (11.8%) at baseline, whereas none were observed for the SF36-PCS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that the SF36-PCS had greater responsiveness in assessing tibial plafond fractures compared to the SMFA-DI and FAOS-ADL, particularly in the first 6 months after surgery. In addition, limitations were revealed in the SMFA-DI and FAOS-ADL. This study illustrates the necessary diligence required for selection of outcome measures, as musculoskeletal and anatomy specific scores are not necessarily superior.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.