Etretinate Therapy for Refractory Sclerodermatous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Chronic graft-versus-host disease: is there an alternative to the conventional treatment?

Despite conventional and new therapies for the treatment of chronic GVHD (cGVHD), this syndrome continues to account for significant morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. With the expanded use of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, matched unrelated as well as mismatched related donors there is an increased incidence of cGVHD that poses a new clinical challenge. Over the past 10 years some new agents have been used, particularly, as a salvage therapy for the treatment of cGVHD. Many of the new agents discussed in this paper may have a role in the future as a therapy for cGVHD. Randomized clinical trials must be performed earlier in the course of cGVHD to establish the efficacy of these new drugs.

Chronic sclerodermic graft-versus-host disease refractory to immunosuppressive treatment responds to UVA1 phototherapy

Graft-versus-host disease is a frequent complication of allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Approximately 10% of patients suffering from chronic graft-versus-host disease develop sclerodermic graft-versus-host disease of the skin, which often does not respond to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. An alternative to immunosuppressive treatment is photochemotherapy. We describe a patient with chronic sclerodermic graft-versus-host disease who did not respond to a combination therapy of cyclosporine and prednisone and later mycophenolate mofetil plus prednisone. A combination therapy of mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day) and low-dose UVA(1) therapy (single dose, 20 J/cm(2), 4 times per week over 6 weeks) resulted in striking clinical improvement of sclerodermic graft-versus-host disease.

Management of graft-versus-host disease in paediatric bone marrow transplant recipients

We discuss clinical strategies for the prophylaxis and treatment of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with particular attention to children. Grades II to IV acute GVHD occur in 10 to 50% of patients given an allogeneic transplantation of haemopoietic stem cells (HSCT) from a genotypically HLA-identical donor. A significantly higher incidence and severity of the disease is reported in patients receiving transplants from partially matched family donors or unrelated volunteers. Younger individuals or patients receiving HSCT from younger donors develop GVHD less frequently than do older recipients. Severe acute GVHD is characterised by a significant decrease in survival probability, even though the graft-versus-leukaemia activity associated with both acute and chronic GVHD may reduce the risk of leukaemia relapse. Prophylaxis of acute GVHD usually consists of in vivo post-grafting immunosuppression with cyclosporin alone or in combination with methotrexate; methotrexate alone can be considered in leukaemia patients with a high risk of relapse. In recent years, tacrolimus is increasingly being used instead of cyclosporin, alone or in combination with methotrexate. In vitro T cell depletion in paediatric patients is usually reserved for those with transplants from partially matched family donors or unrelated volunteers. The treatment of patients with grades II to IV acute GVHD should be immediate and aggressive, as the quality and duration of the response directly correlates with survival. The overall response rate to treatment is often unsatisfactory, ranging from 40 to 50% of cases. First-line treatment usually consists of corticosteroids. In patients not responding to corticosteroids, antilymphocyte globulin and monoclonal antibodies directed towards lymphocytes and/or cytokines produced during GVHD are employed, but with variable success. Patients experiencing acute GVHD are also prone to develop chronic GVHD. whose classical treatment is based on the use of cyclosporin and corticosteroids. More recently, encouraging results in the treatment of patients with chronic GVHD have been reported with the use of extracorporeal photochemotherapy. Other drugs, such as ursodeoxycholic acid, etretinate and clofazimine, are under evaluation.