Effects of ezetimibe added to on-going statin therapy on the lipid profile of hypercholesterolemic patients with diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome

Ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy improves LDL-C goal attainment and lipid profile in patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome

This analysis of the Ezetimibe Add-on to Statin for Effectiveness (EASE) trial examined the effectiveness and safety of ezetimibe 10 mg added to ongoing statin therapy in patients with diabetes, metabolic syndrome without diabetes, or neither disorder who had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels exceeding National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) goals. After six weeks of treatment, ezetimibe added to statin reduced LDL-C in patients with diabetes by 28%, metabolic syndrome by 24%, or neither by 26%, compared with a 3% reduction for placebo for each group. In each group, more patients receiving ezetimibe plus statin reached LDL-C goal (67-74%) compared with those receiving placebo plus statin (19-22%). Other parameters demonstrating greater improvement with ezetimibe included triglycerides, apolipoprotein (Apo)B/Apo A-I ratio, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and C-reactive protein. Ezetimibe plus statin was well tolerated in each group. Ezetimibe added to ongoing statin therapy offers a new treatment option that is consistently effective in improvement of lipid profiles and attainment of LDL-C goals in patients with without diabetes or metabolic syndrome.

Combination of statin and ezetimibe for the treatment of dyslipidemias and the prevention of coronary artery disease

The prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) involves therapeutic lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation, diet, weight reduction and exercise. In patients with established CAD or atherosclerosis in other vascular beds, or in patients at high risk of developing CAD, lowering serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and total mortality. Recently, large-scale studies have shown that lowering the LDL-C to less than 2.0 mmol/L is associated with a reduction of major cardiac events in patients with established CAD. Therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) has had a major impact on preventive cardiology. Not all patients reach recommended LDL-C targets on currently available statins. Ezetimibe is a selective inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption that results in an additional 15% to 25% reduction of LDL-C. The recommended dosage is 10 mg once daily; it is safe and well tolerated. Elevations in transaminase and creatine kinase occur in approximately 1% of subjects. Ezetimibe is suggested for patients who do not reach recommended LDL-C targets on an optimal dosage of statins alone. While the effects of ezetimibe on atherosclerosis have not been ascertained, clinical trials have consistently shown that the reduction in serum cholesterol correlates with a decrease in major cardiovascular events, irrespective of the method used to reduce cholesterol.

Hypolipidemic therapy for the metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome appears to affect a significant proportion of the population and is associated with increased risk for development of cardiovascular disease as well as of type-2 diabetes. No single treatment for the metabolic syndrome as a whole yet exists. While the primary management of patients with the metabolic syndrome involves healthy lifestyle promotion, the atherogenic dyslipidemia is a primary target for cardiovascular disease risk reduction in these patients. Statin therapy provides effective reduction of LDL-cholesterol, which represents the primary therapeutic goal of lipid-lowering therapy in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. Fibrates in turn are effective in normalizing lipid levels (mainly triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol) in patients with the metabolic syndrome and may improve insulin resistance. Whereas statins remain the drug of choice for patients who need to achieve the LDL-cholesterol goal, fibrate therapy may represent an alternative for those with low HDL-cholesterol and high triglyceride levels. The simultaneous use of fibrates could be indicated in patients whose LDL-cholesterol is controlled by statin therapy but whose HDL-cholesterol and/or triglycerides are still inappropriate. Such a combination, however, needs careful monitoring due to the potential hazard of adverse drug interactions. Nicotinic acid and ezetimibe may be useful agents for therapy, particularly when combined with statins. A number of emerging therapies offer potential as future options for the pharmacological treatment of metabolic syndrome.

Reaching goal in hypercholesterolaemia: dual inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and absorption with simvastatin plus ezetimibe

Lowering serum cholesterol levels reduces the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD)-related events. Statins are commonly prescribed as first-line treatment but many patients at high-risk for CHD still fail to reach their cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with statin monotherapy. National and international guidelines for the prevention of CHD recommend the modification of lipid profiles and particularly LDL-C [e.g. the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III; 2001) and Third Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (2003) Guidelines]. Several recent clinical trials indicated an added benefit from aggressive lowering of LDL-C levels. Based on these findings, the NCEP ATP III revised the LDL-C target from < 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) to < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) (optional target) for very high-risk patients and < 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) to < 100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L) for moderately high-risk patients. For patients who fail to achieve their LDL-C target, inhibiting the two main sources of cholesterol - synthesis and uptake - can produce more effective lipid lowering, allowing more patients to reach their LDL-C goal. Ezetimibe is a highly-selective inhibitor of cholesterol absorption and simvastatin is an evidence-based inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis. The LDL-C-lowering efficacy of targeting both major sources of cholesterol with ezetimibe plus simvastatin was demonstrated in several multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. For patients who do not reach their cholesterol goal with a statin, adding ezetimibe 10 mg significantly reduces LDL-C compared with statin monotherapy. Thus, this treatment option may help patients reach the new 'stricter' cholesterol goals. This review, based on a Medline database search from January 2000 to August 2005, considers the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe and discusses the role of this agent for patients who fail to achieve guideline cholesterol goals with statin monotherapy.

Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe is a novel therapeutic target for fatty liver

Ezetimibe is a novel lipid-lowering agent that inhibits intestinal absorption of dietary and biliary cholesterol. The effects of ezetimibe on low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol were found to generally consistent across all subgroups analyzed, including baseline lipid profile, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index. Furthermore, recent clinical studies also revealed that co-administration of ezetimibe with on-going statins offered a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment to lower LDL-cholesterol levels in hypercholesterolemic patients with diabetes mellitus or the metabolic syndrome. Niemann-Pick C1 like 1 (NPC1L1) protein is recently found to be critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption, and is a target protein for ezetimibe. Human NPC1L1 protein is predominantly expressed in liver, whereas small intestine expression is only about 2-4% of that found in the liver. Thus, NPC1L1 does not function solely in the intestinal cholesterol absorption. Furthermore, loss of NPC1L1 expression has been shown to protect against diet-induced fatty liver. These observations let us to speculate that ezetimibe will become a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver, the hepatic manifestation of insulin resistant patients with the metabolic syndrome. In this paper, we would like to propose the possible ways of testing our hypothesis as follows. (1) Does ezetimibe treatment improve fatty liver in patients with hypercholesterolemia or the metabolic syndrome? If the answers are yes, are these beneficial effects of ezetimibe superior to those of other anti-hyperlipidemic resins with equihypolipidemic properties? (2) Does ezetimibe treatment improve insulin sensitivity in fatty liver patients with the metabolic syndrome? (3) How about the effects of ezetimibe treatment on serum levels of adiponectin, a key adipokine with insulin-sensitizing property? Large clinical trials will provide us with more definite information whether ezetimibe treatment can improve fatty liver and resultantly reduce the risk of progression of liver diseases in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Reducing cardiovascular risk in diabetes: beyond glycemic and blood pressure control

Patients with diabetes mellitus have a much higher rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population, and, in addition to glycaemia and hypertension, dyslipidemia has emerged as an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor in these patients. In most patients with type 2 diabetes, the major features of dyslipidemia are increased triglyceride levels, decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, and changes in the composition and level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Clinical trials evaluating both primary and secondary prevention of CVD demonstrate that lipid-lowering therapy results in a substantial reduction of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is the first priority for treatment, with a statin in adequate dosage as the first choice for pharmacological therapy. The first statin trial conducted solely in patients with type 2 diabetes and no prior CVD demonstrated a 37% reduction in cardiovascular events in patients randomized to atorvastatin 10 mg compared with placebo. Additional trials that further address the benefits of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with diabetes are near completion, or are underway, and should provide important information about further attenuating risk in patients with diabetes.

Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome in obesity

The metabolic syndrome is a constellation of interrelated abnormalities that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and progression to type 2 diabetes. The prevalence of this syndrome is increasing because of the 'obesity epidemic'. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III defined practical criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome and established the basic principles for its management. Also, the International Diabetes Federation recently proposed another definition. The metabolic syndrome is a secondary target for cardiovascular risk reduction. Clinicians should identify individuals with this condition, assess their cardiovascular risk and treat them by an aggressive and multifaceted approach. The most effective therapeutic intervention in patients with the metabolic syndrome should focus on modest weight reduction and regular physical activity. Adoption of a healthier diet and smoking cessation are necessary. Drug therapy may be needed to achieve recommended goals if therapeutic lifestyle changes are not sufficient. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is the primary target of therapy (new aggressive goals should be achieved). Statins are probably the drugs of choice. Fibrates and nicotinic acid are also useful options. Hypertension should be managed aggressively probably starting with an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system or a calcium channel blocker and adding a low dose of a thiazide diuretic if necessary. Aspirin should be administered if the cardiovascular risk is high. In the future acarbose, metformin, meglitinides and thiazolidinediones may be used in patients with the metabolic syndrome to delay the onset of type 2 diabetes and reduce cardiovascular risk. Such an intense and multifactorial approach is likely to reverse the bad prognosis associated with the metabolic syndrome.

A COmparative study with rosuvastatin in subjects with METabolic Syndrome: results of the COMETS study†

AIMS

The efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and placebo were compared in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with the metabolic syndrome with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > or =3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL) and multiple risk factors conferring a 10-year coronary heart disease risk score of >10% were randomized (2:2:1) to receive rosuvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 10 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks. Subsequently, the rosuvastatin 10 mg and placebo groups received rosuvastatin 20 mg and the atorvastatin 10 mg group received atorvastatin 20 mg for 6 weeks. LDL-C was reduced significantly more in patients receiving rosuvastatin 10 mg when compared with those receiving atorvastatin 10 mg at 6 weeks [intention-to-treat (ITT) population by randomized treatment: 41.7 vs. 35.7%, P < 0.001; ITT population by as-allocated treatment: 42.7 vs. 36.6%, P < 0.001]. Significant LDL-C reductions were also observed in patients receiving rosuvastatin when compared with those receiving atorvastatin at 12 weeks (48.9 vs. 42.5%, P < 0.001). More patients achieved LDL-C goals with rosuvastatin when compared with atorvastatin. Rosuvastatin increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly more than atorvastatin. Treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

At equivalent doses, rosuvastatin had a significantly greater effect than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C and improving the lipid profile and was well tolerated in patients with the metabolic syndrome.

Anticipating the evolution of clinical cholesterol guidelines: implications of recent statin intervention trials

Over the past two decades, statin-based intervention trials have conclusively shown that lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) prevents cardiovascular disease and death. In response to these trials, the National Cholesterol Education Program has established and refined LDL-C goals in its Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) guidelines. In response to five new statin trials, the 2004 update to ATP III called for more aggressive lowering of LDL-C. Subsequent to the ATP III update, three large-scale statin trials have been published with implications for the management of cholesterol. Review of these recent trials indicates that improved methods of risk stratification and intensification of LDL-C goals are trends which are likely to continue into the future.

Cholesterol-lowering effects of rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes -- CORALL study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of the newest cholesterol-lowering drug, rosuvastatin (RSV) with atorvastatin (ATV) in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A 24-week, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIIb, multicentre study.

SETTING

Diabetes outpatient clinics of 26 hospitals in The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

A total of 263 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral agents or insulin, age (mean +/- SD) 60 +/- 10 years, body mass index (BMI) 31.4 +/- 6.1 kg m(-2), 46% males.

INTERVENTION

After a 6-week dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to RSV (n = 131) or ATV (n = 132) treatment in a dose escalation scheme (RSV: 10, 20 and 40 mg or ATV: 20, 40 and 80 mg for 6 weeks each sequentially).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was the change in apolipoprotein B (apoB) and apoB/apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1) ratio, which has been suggested a better predictor for cardiovascular events than total (TC) or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary outcomes were the changes in other lipid parameters.

RESULTS

Baseline LDL-C in the RSV and ATV groups was 4.23 +/- 0.98 mmol L(-1) and 4.43 +/-0.99 mmol L(-1), whilst apoB/apoA1 was 0.86 +/-0.22 and 0.92 +/- 0.35, respectively. A greater reduction in apoB/apoA1 was seen with RSV (-34.9%, -39.2% and -40.5%) than with ATV (-32.4%, -34.7% and -35.8%, P < 0.05 at weeks 12 and 18). Significantly greater reductions in LDL-C were also seen with RSV (-45.9%, -50.6% and -53.6%) than with ATV (-41.3%, -45.6% and -47.8%, all P < 0.05). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) LDL-C goal of < 2.6 mmol L(-1) was reached by 82%, 84% and 92% of patients with RSV and 74%, 79% and 81% with ATV. Triglyceride reductions ranged from 16 to 24% and were not different between treatments. Both treatments were well-tolerated: nine patients in the RSV and 11 in the ATV group withdrew from treatment because of adverse events after randomization.

CONCLUSION

In subjects with type 2 diabetes, greater improvements of apoB/apoA1 and across the lipid profile were observed with RSV compared with ATV.

Current Treatment Options for the Metabolic Syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is defined as a condition characterized by a set of clinical criteria: insulin resistance, visceral obesity, atherogenic dyslipidemia, and hypertension. The major risk factors leading to the epidemic of this syndrome in the United States are visceral obesity, physical inactivity, and an atherogenic diet. The available current evidence suggests that the first step in management of patients with metabolic syndrome should be focused on lifestyle modifications (eg, weight loss and physical activity). The treatment should be based on two major components: behavioral change to reduce caloric intake and an increase in physical activity. A realistic goal for weight reduction should be 7% to 10% over 6 to 12 months. The general dietary recommendations include low intake of saturated fats, trans fats and cholesterol, and diets with low glycemic index. Soy protein could be more beneficial than animal protein in weight reduction and correction of dyslipidemia. Physical activity is associated with successful weight reduction and these therapeutic lifestyle changes can reduce by half the progression to new-onset diabetes in patients with metabolic syndrome. Physical activity recommendations should include practical, regular, and moderated regimens of exercise, with a daily minimum of 30 to 60 minutes. An equal balance between aerobic exercise and strength training is advised. Medication therapy is a critical step in the management of patients with metabolic syndrome when lifestyle modifications fail to achieve the therapeutic goals. There is no single best therapy and the treatment should consist of treatment of individual component(s). Atherogenic dyslipidemia should be controlled with statins if there is concomitant increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and if indicated with combination therapy, including fibrates, nicotinic acid, bile acid-binding resins, or ezetimibe. Drugs such as thiazolidinediones and renin-angiotensin system blockers are a few of the available agents in this category. Some evidence suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and b blockers are more beneficial for treatment of hypertension in patients with metabolic syndrome. Patients with metabolic syndrome also have elevations in fibrinogen and other coagulation factors leading to prothrombotic state and aspirin may be beneficial for primary prevention in these patients. The new developments in the treatment of metabolic syndrome with drugs, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, will broaden the horizons of the current treatment options in metabolic syndrome.