Use of aromatase inhibitors to treat endometriosis-related pain symptoms: a systematic review

The use of gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues in adolescent and young patients with endometriosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endometriosis is increasingly being recognized and diagnosed in adolescents. As a result of this earlier diagnosis, treatment with agents like gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) begins earlier and may last longer. Long-term effects of GnRHa treatment for endometriosis are of concern when treating adolescents.

RECENT FINDINGS

GnRHas are used for adolescents with surgically confirmed endometriosis. GnRHa treatment is effective for pain reduction, but is associated with menopausal symptoms and decreases in bone density. Different regimens of hormonal add-back therapy have been studied in adults to attempt to prevent these side-effects.

SUMMARY

GnRHa therapy is a highly effective, nonsurgical treatment option for many adolescents with endometriosis, but is accompanied by side-effects of bone loss and menopausal symptoms. Side-effects may be decreased by introducing appropriate add-back therapy. Monitoring of bone density by DXA is recommended for prolonged use of GnRHa in adolescents.

Sex differences and hormonal modulation of deep tissue pain

Women disproportionately suffer from many deep tissue pain conditions. Experimental studies show that women have lower pain thresholds, higher pain ratings and less tolerance to a range of painful stimuli. Most clinical and epidemiological reports suggest female gonadal hormones modulate pain for some, but not all, conditions. Similarly, animal studies support greater nociceptive sensitivity in females in many deep tissue pain models. Gonadal hormones modulate responses in primary afferents, dorsal horn neurons and supraspinal sites, but the direction of modulation is variable. This review will examine sex differences in deep tissue pain in humans and animals focusing on the role of gonadal hormones (mainly estradiol) as an underlying component of the modulation of pain sensitivity.

Is a bowel resection necessary for deep endometriosis with rectovaginal or colorectal involvement?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this paper is to report the long-term results of surgery without bowel resection in patients suffering from deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectovaginal or colorectal involvement.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study identified 42 patients suffering with deep infiltrating endometriosis who underwent surgery. Conservative surgery was performed in 23 women (only one of them with bowel resection), and 19 women underwent a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (HBSO). In the conservative surgery group, a later HBSO was performed in eight patients as a second operation. Pregnancies, recurrences, reoperations, use of hormone replacement therapy, and outcomes during long-term follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 7 ± 5.7 years in conservative surgery cases. Only one patient was treated with sigmoid bowel resection in 1997 and had complications. In this conservative surgery group, 13 patients (56%) received medical treatment after surgery, 10 patients wanted to get pregnant (of whom seven [70%] were successful), and eight patients underwent a subsequent HBSO because of recurrent symptoms and/or endometrioma. Therefore, HBSO was performed in 27 patients, of whom 14 (51.8%) used hormone replacement therapy for 5.6 ± 3.6 years. No recurrences or complications were observed in patients after HBSO with or without hormone replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

Good clinical results can be obtained by performing only conservative surgery and/or HBSO without bowel resection, an alternative that could reduce the number of colorectal resections that are performed very frequently nowadays. After HBSO, patients may use hormone replacement therapy for several years with total satisfaction and well-being.

Update on the treatment of endometriosis

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside the uterus, causing diverse progressive symptoms such as infertility, pelvic pain, and dysmenorrhea. Although endometriosis has been described since the 1800s, the mechanisms responsible for its pathogenesis and progression remain poorly understood. It is well established that endometriosis grows and regresses in an estrogen-dependent fashion and the disease can be effectively cured by definitive surgery. However, prolonged medical therapy may be needed in most of the cases since conservative surgery is usually performed especially in young women. This treatment modality is often associated with only partial relief and/or recurrence of the disease. In the present review, up-to-date findings on the treatment of endometriosis will be briefly summarized. The outcomes of surgery in patients with endometriosis will be reviewed in terms of pelvic pain relief as well as infertility treatment largely based on recent Cochrane reviews and clinical reports. The efficacy of newer drugs including aromatase inhibitor, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and dienogest will be also reviewed based on recent clinical studies.

New trends for the medical treatment of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a benign sex hormone-dependent gynecological disease, characterized by the presence and growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus; it affects 10% of women of reproductive age and is associated with infertility and pain. Treatment of endometriosis involves conservative or radical surgery, or medical therapies. The goals for endometriosis treatment may be the relief of pain and/or a successful pregnancy achievement in infertile patients. Treatment must be individualized with a multidisciplinary approach. The classical treatments carry adverse side effects and in some cases a negative impact on quality of life. New agents promise a distinct perspective in endometriosis treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this paper is to systematically review the literature evidence of new medical treatments for endometriosis, defined as pharmacological treatments not yet commonly available and currently under investigation.

EXPERT OPINION

These new medical therapies would be used associated with surgical treatment and, in the future, will render possible the association of hormone therapy with non-hormonal treatment for endometriosis.

Management of Endometriosis-Related Pain: An Update

Endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent condition affecting 6–10% of women of a reproductive age. It results from implantation of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. It is associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Treatment for endometriosis ranges from medical management, to conservative surgery, to definitive surgery with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and should be based on patient's fertility desires and tolerance. Medical treatment involves hormonal manipulation to induce a hypoestrogenic or antiestrogenic state to induce regression and apoptosis of lesions. Endometriosis can have dire effects on women's lives and productivity; this article will focus on early diagnosis, treatment and prevention of recurrence of the disease.

Medication and transference in psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy of the borderline patient

The regressive potential of the borderline patient has been recognized ever since the term was first introduced by Adolph Stern in 1938. He believed these patients were "too ill for classical psychoanalysis," and indeed almost all who have written on this subject have supported Stern's view, recognizing the severe regressive potential of a borderline patient in unmodified psychoanalysis. Taking medication is not generally considered to be a particularly regressive experience. It should be remembered, however, that for many patients and especially for patients with borderline personality disorder, medication can be both an overvalued hope and a terrifying assault. Thus, although the pharmacologic action of the medication may help to integrate the patient's ego functioning, the very taking of the medication may at the same time initiate subtle and unanticipated regressive drives. Two forces are then set in motion with potentially different effects. In a treatment where the same physician is prescribing medication and doing psychotherapy, the common pathway of these forces is transference. Thus, pharmacologic action may modify transference. And more importantly, because it is less easily recognized, transference issues may affect the patient's subjective experience of the action of the medication. For this reason, it is particularly important that not only diagnostic issues but also transference issues be understood before medication is prescribed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)