52
|
De Melo J, Tang D. Elevation of SIPL1 (SHARPIN) Increases Breast Cancer Risk. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127546. [PMID: 25992689 PMCID: PMC4438068 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
SIPL1 (Sharpin) or Sharpin plays a role in tumorigenesis. However, its involvement in breast cancer tumorigenesis remains largely unknown. To investigate this issue, we have systemically analyzed SIPL1 gene amplification and expression data available from Oncomine datasets, which were derived from 17 studies and contained approximately 20,000 genes, 3438 breast cancer cases, and 228 normal individuals. We found a SIPL1 gene amplification in invasive ductal breast cancers compared to normal breast tissues and a significant elevation of SIPL1 mRNA in breast cancers in comparison to non-tumor breast tissues. These results collectively reveal that increases in SIPL1 expression occur during breast cancer tumorigenesis. To further investigate this association, we observed increases in the SIPL1 gene and mRNA in the breast cancer subtypes of estrogen receptor (ER)+, progesterone receptor (PR)+, HER2+, or triple negative. Additionally, a gain of the SIPL1 gene correlated with breast cancer grade and the levels of SIPL1 mRNA associated with both breast cancer stages and grades. Elevation of SIPL1 gene copy and mRNA is linked to a decrease in patient survival, especially for those with PR+, ER+, or HER2- breast cancers. These results are supported by our analysis of SIPL1 protein expression using a tissue microarray containing 224 breast cancer cases, in which higher levels of SIPL1 relate to ER+ and PR+ tumors and AKT activation. Furthermore, we were able to show that progesterone significantly reduced SIPL1 mRNA and protein expression in MCF7 cells. As progesterone enhances breast cancer tumorigenesis in a context dependent manner, inhibition of SIPL1 expression may contribute to progesterone's non-tumorigenic function which might be countered by SIPL1 upregulation. Taken together, we demonstrate a positive correlation of SIPL1 with BC tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason De Melo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
- Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
- The Hamilton Center for Kidney Research, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Damu Tang
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
- Father Sean O’Sullivan Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
- The Hamilton Center for Kidney Research, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Abstract
Progesterone and progesterone receptors (PRs) are essential for the development and cyclical regulation of hormone-responsive tissues including the breast and reproductive tract. Altered functions of PR isoforms contribute to the pathogenesis of tumors that arise in these tissues. In the breast, progesterone acts in concert with estrogen to promote proliferative and pro-survival gene programs. In sharp contrast, progesterone inhibits estrogen-driven growth in the uterus and protects the ovary from neoplastic transformation. Progesterone-dependent actions and associated biology in diverse tissues and tumors are mediated by two PR isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. These isoforms are subject to altered transcriptional activity or expression levels, differential crosstalk with growth factor signaling pathways, and distinct post-translational modifications and cofactor-binding partners. Herein, we summarize and discuss the recent literature focused on progesterone and PR isoform-specific actions in breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers. Understanding the complexity of context-dependent PR actions in these tissues is critical to developing new models that will allow us to advance our knowledge base with the goal of revealing novel and efficacious therapeutic regimens for these hormone-responsive diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline H Diep
- HematologyOncology, and Transplantation DivisionDepartments of MedicinePharmacologyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Delivery Code 2812, Cancer Cardiology Research Building, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USADivision of Physiology and GrowthDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108, USA
| | - Andrea R Daniel
- HematologyOncology, and Transplantation DivisionDepartments of MedicinePharmacologyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Delivery Code 2812, Cancer Cardiology Research Building, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USADivision of Physiology and GrowthDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108, USA
| | - Laura J Mauro
- HematologyOncology, and Transplantation DivisionDepartments of MedicinePharmacologyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Delivery Code 2812, Cancer Cardiology Research Building, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USADivision of Physiology and GrowthDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108, USA
| | - Todd P Knutson
- HematologyOncology, and Transplantation DivisionDepartments of MedicinePharmacologyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Delivery Code 2812, Cancer Cardiology Research Building, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USADivision of Physiology and GrowthDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108, USA
| | - Carol A Lange
- HematologyOncology, and Transplantation DivisionDepartments of MedicinePharmacologyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Delivery Code 2812, Cancer Cardiology Research Building, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USADivision of Physiology and GrowthDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108, USA HematologyOncology, and Transplantation DivisionDepartments of MedicinePharmacologyMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Delivery Code 2812, Cancer Cardiology Research Building, 2231 6th Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USADivision of Physiology and GrowthDepartment of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Abstract
Antiprogestins constitute a group of compounds, developed since the early 1980s, that bind progesterone receptors with different affinities. The first clinical uses for antiprogestins were in reproductive medicine, e.g., menstrual regulation, emergency contraception, and termination of early pregnancies. These initial applications, however, belied the capacity for these compounds to interfere with cell growth. Within the context of gynecological diseases, antiprogestins can block the growth of and kill gynecological-related cancer cells, such as those originating in the breast, ovary, endometrium, and cervix. They can also interrupt the excessive growth of cells giving rise to benign gynecological diseases such as endometriosis and leiomyomata (uterine fibroids). In this article, we present a review of the literature providing support for the antigrowth activity that antiprogestins impose on cells in various gynecological diseases. We also provide a summary of the cellular and molecular mechanisms reported for these compounds that lead to cell growth inhibition and death. The preclinical knowledge gained during the past few years provides robust evidence to encourage the use of antiprogestins in order to alleviate the burden of gynecological diseases, either as monotherapies or as adjuvants of other therapies with the perspective of allowing for long-term treatments with tolerable side effects. The key to the clinical success of antiprogestins in this field probably lies in selecting those patients who will benefit from this therapy. This can be achieved by defining the genetic makeup required - within each particular gynecological disease - for attaining an objective response to antiprogestin-driven growth inhibition therapy.Free Spanish abstractA Spanish translation of this abstract is freely available at http://www.reproduction-online.org/content/149/1/15/suppl/DC1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia A Goyeneche
- Division of Basic Biomedical SciencesSanford School of Medicine, The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| | - Carlos M Telleria
- Division of Basic Biomedical SciencesSanford School of Medicine, The University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Androgen receptor splice variants in the era of enzalutamide and abiraterone. Discov Oncol 2014; 5:265-73. [PMID: 25048254 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-014-0190-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 07/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The FDA approvals of enzalutamide and abiraterone have rapidly changed the clinical landscape of prostate cancer treatment. Both drugs were designed to further suppress androgen receptor (AR) signaling, which is restored following first-line androgen deprivation therapies. Resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone, however, is again marked by a return of AR signaling, indicating a remarkable "addiction" of prostate cancer cells to the AR pathway. Several mechanisms of castration resistance have been uncovered in the past decades, featuring a wide spectrum of molecular alterations that may explain sustained AR signaling in castration-resistant prostate cancers (CRPC). Among these, the androgen receptor splice variants (AR-Vs), particularly variant 7 (AR-V7), have been implicated in resistance to enzalutamide and abiraterone in preclinical studies, and they cannot be targeted by currently available AR-directed drugs. Drug development for AR-V-associated CRPC may therefore be necessary to augment the preexisting treatment repertoire. In this mini-review, we will discuss general mechanisms of resistance to AR-directed therapies, with a focus on the role of androgen receptor splice variants in the new era of treating advanced prostate cancer with enzalutamide and abiraterone.
Collapse
|