51
|
Zhao XB, Ren GS. WITHDRAWN: LncRNA TUG1 promotes breast cancer cell proliferation via inhibiting miR-9. Cancer Biomark 2016:CBM669. [PMID: 27791993 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-160669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Ahead of Print article withdrawn by publisher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Bo Zhao
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nan chong, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Ren
- Department of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Fleisher B, Clarke C, Ait-Oudhia S. Current advances in biomarkers for targeted therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2016; 8:183-197. [PMID: 27785100 PMCID: PMC5063595 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s114659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a complex heterogeneous disease characterized by the absence of three hallmark receptors: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor. Compared to other breast cancer subtypes, TNBC is more aggressive, has a higher prevalence in African-Americans, and more frequently affects younger patients. Currently, TNBC lacks clinically accepted targets for tailored therapy, warranting the need for candidate biomarkers. BiomarkerBase, an online platform used to find biomarkers reported in clinical trials, was utilized to screen all potential biomarkers for TNBC and select only the ones registered in completed TNBC trials through clinicaltrials.gov. The selected candidate biomarkers were classified as surrogate, prognostic, predictive, or pharmacodynamic (PD) and organized by location in the blood, on the cell surface, in the cytoplasm, or in the nucleus. Blood biomarkers include vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and interleukin-8 (IL-8); cell surface biomarkers include EGFR, insulin-like growth factor binding protein, c-Kit, c-Met, and PD-L1; cytoplasm biomarkers include PIK3CA, pAKT/S6/p4E-BP1, PTEN, ALDH1, and the PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR-related metabolites; and nucleus biomarkers include BRCA1, the gluco-corticoid receptor, TP53, and Ki67. Candidate biomarkers were further organized into a "cellular protein network" that demonstrates potential connectivity. This review provides an inventory and reference point for promising biomarkers for breakthrough targeted therapies in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Fleisher
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL
| | - Charlotte Clarke
- Department of Translational Research, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sihem Ait-Oudhia
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
The Association between EGFR and cMET Expression and Phosphorylation and Its Prognostic Implication in Patients with Breast Cancer. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0152585. [PMID: 27055285 PMCID: PMC4824503 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
EGFR and cMET cross-talk is involved in breast cancer (BC) progression and resistance to different targeted therapies, however little is known about the co-expression patterns of EGFR and cMET or its prognostic significance in BC. Protein levels of EGFR, cMET and their phosphorylated proteins were measured in 825 BC samples using reverse phase protein array (RPPA). Given unimodal distribution of proteins, the median was selected as a cut-off after sensitivity analyses. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox-proportional hazards models were utilized to determine associations between EGFR and cMET with outcomes. Mean age was 58 years with 457 (55%) hormone receptor (HR) positive, 211 (26%) triple-negative (TN) and 148 (18%) HER2 positive tumors (HER2+). HER2+ was associated with higher EGFR expression and phosphorylation, compared to HR and TN (p<0.05). High EGFR expression was associated with higher phosphorylated-cMET (p-cMET) but not cMET (ANOVA p-cMET p < 0.001; cMET p = 0.34). The same association was found with high phosphorylated-EGFR (p-EGFR) group at Tyr992 and Tyr1068 (both p < 0.001). High expressions in either of two p-EGFRs were linked with higher cMET as well (all p<0.001). For the TN subtype, high expression in EGFR and p-EGFR at Tyr992 but not at Tyr1068 was associated with higher p-cMET (p<0.00, p = 0.012, p = 0.4 respectively). Only high expression in p-EGFR at Tyr992 was linked with higher expression of cMET (p = 0.02). In contrast, among HER2 subtype, high expression in p-EGFR at Tyr1068 but not at Tyr992 was associated with higher cMET and p-cMET (cMET p = 0.023;p-cMET p<0.001). Four subgroups of patients defined by dichotomized EGFR/p-EGFR and cMET/p-cMET level demonstrated no significant differences in survival. In multivariate analyses, neither cMET nor EGFR expression/activation was found to be an independent prognostic factor in survival outcome.
Collapse
|
54
|
Cozzo AJ, Sundaram S, Zattra O, Qin Y, Freemerman AJ, Essaid L, Darr DB, Montgomery SA, McNaughton KK, Ezzell JA, Galanko JA, Troester MA, Makowski L. cMET inhibitor crizotinib impairs angiogenesis and reduces tumor burden in the C3(1)-Tag model of basal-like breast cancer. SPRINGERPLUS 2016; 5:348. [PMID: 27057482 PMCID: PMC4799044 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-1920-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Epidemiologic studies have associated obesity with increased risk of the aggressive basal-like breast cancer (BBC) subtype. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signaling through its receptor, cMET, is elevated in obesity and is a pro-tumorigenic pathway strongly associated with BBC. We previously reported that high fat diet (HFD) elevated HGF, cMET, and phospho-cMET in normal mammary gland, with accelerated tumor development, compared to low fat diet (LFD)-fed lean controls in a murine model of BBC. We also showed that weight loss resulted in a significant reversal of HFD-induced effects on latency and elevation of HGF/cMET signaling in normal mammary and cMET in normal mammary and tumors. Here, we sought to inhibit BBC tumor progression in LFD- and HFD-fed C3(1)-Tag BBC mice using a small molecule cMET inhibitor, and began crizotinib treatment (50 mg/kg body weight by oral gavage) upon identification of the first palpable tumor. We next investigated if administering crizotinib in a window prior to tumor development would inhibit or delay BBC tumorigenesis. Treatment: Crizotinib significantly reduced mean tumor burden by 27.96 and 37.29 %, and mean tumor vascularity by 35.04 and 33.52 %, in our LFD- and HFD-fed C3(1)-Tag BBC mice, respectively. Prevention: Crizotinib significantly accelerated primary tumor progression in both diet groups but had no effect on total tumor progression or total tumor burden. In sum, cMET inhibition by crizotinib limited tumor development and microvascular density in basal-like tumor-bearing mice but did not appear to be an effective preventive agent for BBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa J Cozzo
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Sneha Sundaram
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Ottavia Zattra
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Yuanyuan Qin
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Alex J Freemerman
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Luma Essaid
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - David B Darr
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Stephanie A Montgomery
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Kirk K McNaughton
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - J Ashley Ezzell
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Joseph A Galanko
- Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| | - Liza Makowski
- Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.,Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Diagnosis and Prognostic Significance of c-Met in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. DISEASE MARKERS 2016; 2016:6594016. [PMID: 27069297 PMCID: PMC4812361 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6594016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Revised: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Objective. A meta-analysis was conducted to analyze c-Met expression in cervical cancer. Methods. Articles related to our study were retrieved from PubMed, Elsevier, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. State 12.0 was used for literature review, data extraction, and meta-analysis. The random-effects model and fixed-effects model were utilized to pool the relative ratio based on the heterogeneity test in the meta-analysis. Results. Nine studies that include data of 685 cervical carcinoma tissues were analyzed. However, three studies did not thoroughly discuss c-Met expression in nonneoplastic cervical tissue; thus, only six studies involving 364 patients and 228 nonneoplastic cervical tissues were included in the review. c-Met expression was higher in cervical cancer (60.99%) than in nonneoplastic cervical tissue (19.74%). Cervical carcinoma, cervical intraepithelial neoplasm, and normal cervical tissue were also examined. Results showed that increasing malignancy resulted in elevated c-Met expression. The relationship between c-Met expression and clinicopathologic features was also evaluated. c-Met expression correlated with disease-free survival, lymph node involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion. No statistical difference was observed between c-Met expression and other clinicopathological factors. Conclusions. c-Met is a potential diagnostic and prognostic indicator of cervical cancer.
Collapse
|
56
|
Ren X, Yuan L, Shen S, Wu H, Lu J, Liang Z. c-Met and ERβ expression differences in basal-like and non-basal-like triple-negative breast cancer. Tumour Biol 2016; 37:11385-95. [PMID: 26968553 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-016-5010-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are two entities of breast cancer that share similar poor prognosis. Even though both cancers have overlaps, there are still some differences between those two types. It has been reported that the c-Met high expression was associated with poor prognosis not only in breast cancer but also in many other cancers. The role of ERβ in pathogenesis and treatment of breast cancer has remained controversial. In this study, we firstly distinguished basal-like from nonbasal-like cancer patients in TNBC patients using CK5/6 and EGFR as markers and next determined the relationship of basal-like breast cancer with c-Met or ERβ expression levels and prognosis in TNBC patients. One hundred twenty-seven patients who had been diagnosed with TNBC were enrolled. The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients were recorded. The expression of EGFR, CK5/6, ERβ, and c-Met were evaluated with immunohistochemical methods using paraffin blocks. The median age of patients was 50.7 years. CK5/6 immunopositivity was 31.5 % (40/127), and EGFR was 40.2 % (51/127). Of the TNBC cases, 55.1 % (71/127) were positive for either CK5/6 or EGFR and were thus classified as basal-like breast cancer. C-Met (P < 0.001) and ERβ (P = 0.002) overexpression, small tumor sizes, a ductal subtype, and high-grade tumor were significantly correlated with BLBC. High c-Met expression was detected in 43.3 % patients. Metastatic lymph nodes and tumor size (>5 cm), which were both important prognostic predictors, were significantly associated with recurrence and mortality. BLBC typically demonstrates a unique profile. CK5/6 and EGFR expression combination indicates a higher basal-like phenotype possibility. The expression of c-Met and ERβ were significantly related to the basal-like phenotype. The classical markers, lymph node metastasis, and tumor size were found to have important prognostic value. However, high c-Met expression and basal-like phenotypes did not show a direct correlation with poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Ren
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Li Yuan
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Songjie Shen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hanwen Wu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Junliang Lu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyong Liang
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Minuti G, Landi L. MET deregulation in breast cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2015; 3:181. [PMID: 26366398 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.06.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) is an oncogene encoding for a trans-membrane tyrosine kinase receptor activated by the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). MET has a normal function in organ development during embryogenesis and in tissue homeostasis during adult life. Deregulation of HGF/MET signaling pathway is frequently observed in many cancer types, conferring invasive growth and tendency to progression. MET deregulation is due to gene amplification or increased copy number, gene mutation, receptor over-expression or ligand autocrine loops activation. These events lead to migration, invasion, proliferation, metastatic spread and neo-angiogenesis of cancer cells, suggesting that anti-HGF/MET agents may represent a potential antitumor strategy. In breast cancer (BC), preclinical and clinical data demonstrated the role of HGF/MET signalling pathway in carcinogenesis, disease progression and resistance features. METHODS For this review article, all published data on HGF/MET in BC were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Several evidences underline that, in early BC, MET over-expression has an independent negative prognostic significance, regardless of method used for evaluation and BC subtypes. Available data suggest that MET is a relevant target particularly in basal-like (BL) and in triple negative BC. Moreover, preclinical and retrospective data support the critical role of MET deregulation in the development of resistance to target-agents, such as anti-HER2 strategies. CONCLUSIONS MET is a promising new target in BC. Several anti-MET agents are under investigation and ongoing clinical trials will clarify its relevance in BC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Minuti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy
| | - Lorenza Landi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Civil Hospital of Livorno, Livorno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|