51
|
Randall EC, Emdal KB, Laramy JK, Kim M, Roos A, Calligaris D, Regan MS, Gupta SK, Mladek AC, Carlson BL, Johnson AJ, Lu FK, Xie XS, Joughin BA, Reddy RJ, Peng S, Abdelmoula WM, Jackson PR, Kolluri A, Kellersberger KA, Agar JN, Lauffenburger DA, Swanson KR, Tran NL, Elmquist WF, White FM, Sarkaria JN, Agar NYR. Integrated mapping of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in a patient-derived xenograft model of glioblastoma. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4904. [PMID: 30464169 PMCID: PMC6249307 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07334-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic options for the treatment of glioblastoma remain inadequate despite concerted research efforts in drug development. Therapeutic failure can result from poor permeability of the blood-brain barrier, heterogeneous drug distribution, and development of resistance. Elucidation of relationships among such parameters could enable the development of predictive models of drug response in patients and inform drug development. Complementary analyses were applied to a glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft model in order to quantitatively map distribution and resulting cellular response to the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Mass spectrometry images of erlotinib were registered to histology and magnetic resonance images in order to correlate drug distribution with tumor characteristics. Phosphoproteomics and immunohistochemistry were used to assess protein signaling in response to drug, and integrated with transcriptional response using mRNA sequencing. This comprehensive dataset provides simultaneous insight into pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and indicates that erlotinib delivery to intracranial tumors is insufficient to inhibit EGFR tyrosine kinase signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Randall
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Kristina B Emdal
- Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Janice K Laramy
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Minjee Kim
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Alison Roos
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd.MCCRB 03-055, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - David Calligaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Michael S Regan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Shiv K Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - Ann C Mladek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - Brett L Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - Aaron J Johnson
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - Fa-Ke Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA
| | - X Sunney Xie
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Brian A Joughin
- Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Raven J Reddy
- Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Sen Peng
- Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Walid M Abdelmoula
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Pamela R Jackson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Aarti Kolluri
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey N Agar
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, 412 TF (140 The Fenway), Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Douglas A Lauffenburger
- Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Nhan L Tran
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd.MCCRB 03-055, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - William F Elmquist
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Forest M White
- Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 500 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA
| | - Nathalie Y R Agar
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Laub CK, Stefanik J, Doherty L. Approved Treatments for Patients with Recurrent High-grade Gliomas. Semin Oncol Nurs 2018; 34:486-493. [PMID: 30392759 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the existing glioma literature and National Comprehensive Cancer Network current standard-of care guidelines for recurrent high-grade glioma, which includes surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies. DATA SOURCES PubMed, MedlinePlus, Science Direct, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and Google Scholar were searched. Key words for databases were high-grade glioma, glioblastoma, recurrent, surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. CONCLUSION Approved treatments for patients with recurrent high-grade glioma are limited and do not significantly impact progression-free survival rates, nor do they offer long-term benefit in symptom improvement or quality of life. Particular consideration for progression versus pseudoprogression should be evaluated before pursuing recurrent therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Given the limited availability of standard-of-care treatments, clinical trials should be prioritized to maximize future treatment options. Individual performance status, genetic and molecular profiles, as well as goals of care and quality of life are important considerations in the context of treatment plans.
Collapse
|
53
|
Süveg K, Putora PM, Berghmans T, Glatzer M, Kovac V, Cihoric N. Current efforts in research of pleural mesothelioma—An analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. Lung Cancer 2018; 124:12-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
54
|
Hussein M, Heijmen BJM, Verellen D, Nisbet A. Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180270. [PMID: 30074813 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment planning of complex radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy, is a resource-intensive process requiring a high level of treatment planner intervention to ensure high plan quality. This can lead to variability in the quality of treatment plans and the efficiency in which plans are produced, depending on the skills and experience of the operator and available planning time. Within the last few years, there has been significant progress in the research and development of intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning approaches with automation support, with most commercial manufacturers now offering some form of solution. There is a rapidly growing number of research articles published in the scientific literature on the topic. This paper critically reviews the body of publications up to April 2018. The review describes the different types of automation algorithms, including the advantages and current limitations. Also included is a discussion on the potential issues with routine clinical implementation of such software, and highlights areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hussein
- 1 Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory , Teddington , UK
| | - Ben J M Heijmen
- 2 Division of Medical Physics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Verellen
- 3 Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) , Brussels , Belgium.,4 Radiotherapy Department, Iridium Kankernetwerk , Antwerp , Belgium
| | - Andrew Nisbet
- 5 Department of Medical Physics, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust , Guildford , UK.,6 Department of Physics, University of Surrey , Guildford , UK
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Cihoric N, Vlaskou Badra E, Tsikkinis A, Prasad V, Kroeze S, Igrutinovic I, Jeremic B, Beck M, Zschaeck S, Wust P, Ghadjar P. Clinical trials involving positron emission tomography and prostate cancer: an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:113. [PMID: 29914515 PMCID: PMC6006688 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1057-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The goal of this study is to evaluate the status and future perspectives of clinical trials on positron emission tomography in prostate cancer for diagnostic or therapeutic as well as for surveillance purposes. Methods The www.ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched on the 20th of January 2017 for all trials containing terms describing “prostate cancer” (prostate, prostatic, malignant, malignancy, cancer, tumor) and “positron emission tomography”. In total 167 trials were identified. Trials that included diseases other than PCa were excluded (n = 27; 16%). Furthermore, we excluded trials (n = 4, 2%) withdrawn prior to first patient enrollment. The remaining trials (n = 137, 82%) were selected for further manual classification analysis. Results One hundred thirty-seven trials were detected and analyzed. Majority of trials were in “active” recruitment status (n = 46, 34%) followed by trials that had been “completed” - (n = 34, 25%) and trials with “closed recruitment but active follow-up” (n = 23, 17%). Phase 1 and 2 comprised 46% of the complete trial portfolio. Locally confined disease was of major interest (n = 46, 34%), followed by metastatic disease – not otherwise specified (n = 43, 13%). Evaluation of PET was the primary goal of the trial in 114 (83%) cases. Most of the trials evaluated only one agent (n = 122, 89%). Choline and PSMA represented two major groups (total 50%) and they were equally distributed across trial portfolio with 25% (n = 34) each. PSMA trials showed the highest average annual growth rate of 56%. The trials were conducted in 17 countries. Conclusion The scientific community is showing a strong and ever-growing interest in the field and we expect that in the coming years, more phase III trials will be initiated ultimately delivering the required Level 1 evidence. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1057-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikola Cihoric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexandros Tsikkinis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vikas Prasad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stephanie Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
The relationship of study and authorship characteristics on trial sponsorship and self-reported conflicts of interest among neuro-oncology clinical trials. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:195-203. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2860-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
57
|
Lampson LA. Editorial: Immunotherapy for Tumor in the Brain: Insights From-and For-Other Tumor Sites. Front Oncol 2018; 8:128. [PMID: 29755955 PMCID: PMC5934480 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lois A Lampson
- Brain Immunology Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Brandel MG, Rennert RC, Lopez Ramos C, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Steinberg JA, Sarkar RR, Wali AR, Pannell JS, Murphy JD, Khalessi AA. Management of glioblastoma at safety-net hospitals. J Neurooncol 2018; 139:389-397. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2875-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
59
|
Chiu TD, Parsons D, Zhang Y, Hrycushko B, Zhao B, Chopra R, Kim N, Spangler A, Rahimi A, Timmerman R, Jiang SB, Lu W, Gu X. Prototype volumetric ultrasound tomography image guidance system for prone stereotactic partial breast irradiation: proof-of-concept. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:055004. [PMID: 29405123 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaad1f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Accurate dose delivery in stereotactic partial breast irradiation (S-PBI) is challenging because of the target position uncertainty caused by breast deformation, the target volume changes caused by lumpectomy cavity shrinkage, and the target delineation uncertainty on simulation computed tomography (CT) images caused by poor soft tissue contrast. We have developed a volumetric ultrasound tomography (UST) image guidance system for prone position S-PBI. The system is composed of a novel 3D printed rotation water tank, a patient-specific resin breast immobilization cup, and a 1D array ultrasound transducer. Coronal 2D US images were acquired in 5° increments over a 360° range, and planes were acquired every 2 mm in elevation. A super-compounding technique was used to reconstruct the image volume. The image quality of UST was evaluated with a BB-1 breast phantom and BioZorb surgical marker, and the results revealed that UST offered better soft tissue contrast than CT and similar image quality to MR. In the evaluated plane, the size and location of five embedded objects were measured and compared to MR, which is considered as the ground truth. Objects' diameters and the distances between objects in UST differ by approximately 1 to 2 mm from those in MR, which showed that UST offers the image quality required for S-PBI. In future work we will develop a robotic system that will be ultimately implemented in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuicheng D Chiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America. Tsuicheng Chiu and David Parsons contributed equally to this study
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Zygogianni A, Protopapa M, Kougioumtzopoulou A, Simopoulou F, Nikoloudi S, Kouloulias V. From imaging to biology of glioblastoma: new clinical oncology perspectives to the problem of local recurrence. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 20:989-1003. [PMID: 29335830 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1831-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
GBM is one of the most common and aggressive brain tumors. Surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation have succeeded in providing a survival benefit. Although most patients will eventually experience local recurrence, the means to fight recurrence are limited and prognosis remains poor. In a disease where local control remains the major challenge, few trials have addressed the efficacy of local treatments, either surgery or radiation therapy. The present article reviews recent advances in the biology, imaging and biomarker science of GBM as well as the current treatment status of GBM, providing new perspectives to the problem of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Zygogianni
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M Protopapa
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Kougioumtzopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece
| | - F Simopoulou
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Nikoloudi
- Radiotherapy Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Medical School, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - V Kouloulias
- Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Rimini 1, 12462, Chaidari, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Hauser A, Dutta SW, Showalter TN, Sheehan JP, Grover S, Trifiletti DM. Impact of academic facility type and volume on post-surgical outcomes following diagnosis of glioblastoma. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 47:103-110. [PMID: 29113851 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify if facility type and/or facility volume impact overall survival (OS) following diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM). We also sought to compare early post-surgical outcomes based on these factors. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with GBM diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 with known survival. Patients were grouped based on facility type and facility volume. Multivariable analyses were performed to investigate factors associated OS following diagnosis and Chi-square tests were used to compare early post-surgical outcomes. RESULTS 89,839 patients met inclusion criteria. Factors associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis included younger patient age, female gender, race, lower comorbidity score, higher performance score, smaller tumor size, unifocal tumors, MGMT hypermethylation, fully resected tumors, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (each p < .001). Also, OS was improved among patients treated at centers averaging at least 30.2 cases per year (HR 0.948, compared to <7.4 cases/year, p < .001), and patients treated at Academic/Research programs had improved survival compared to those treated at Comprehensive Community Cancer programs (HR 1.069, p < .001) and Integrated Network Cancer programs (HR 1.126, p < .001). Similarly, Academic/Research programs and high volume centers demonstrated improved 30- and 90-day morality as well as 30-day readmission rates (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that patients treated in Academic/Research programs and high patient-volume centers have increased survival and more favorable early-postsurgical outcomes. The extent to which differences in patient populations, socioeconomic factors, and/or provider expertise play into this cause will be areas of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Hauser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Sunil W Dutta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
62
|
Protopapa M, Zygogianni A, Stamatakos GS, Antypas C, Armpilia C, Uzunoglu NK, Kouloulias V. Clinical implications of in silico mathematical modeling for glioblastoma: a critical review. J Neurooncol 2017; 136:1-11. [PMID: 29081039 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2650-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma remains a clinical challenge in spite of years of extensive research. Novel approaches are needed in order to integrate the existing knowledge. This is the potential role of mathematical oncology. This paper reviews mathematical models on glioblastoma from the clinical doctor's point of view, with focus on 3D modeling approaches of radiation response of in vivo glioblastomas based on contemporary imaging techniques. As these models aim to provide a clinically useful tool in the era of personalized medicine, the integration of the latest advances in molecular and imaging science and in clinical practice by the in silico models is crucial for their clinical relevance. Our aim is to indicate areas of GBM research that have not yet been addressed by in silico models and to point out evidence that has come up from in silico experiments, which may be worth considering in the clinic. This review examines how close these models have come in predicting the outcome of treatment protocols and in shaping the future of radiotherapy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Protopapa
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieio University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Anna Zygogianni
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieio University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios S Stamatakos
- Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Antypas
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieio University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Armpilia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st Department of Radiology, Aretaieio University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos K Uzunoglu
- Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. .,Radiotherapy Unit, 2nd Department of Radiology, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Prasad GL. Primary Spinal Cord Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Rare but Uniformly Fatal Neoplasm. World Neurosurg 2017; 104:1020-1021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
64
|
Recombinant Immunotoxin Therapy of Glioblastoma: Smart Design, Key Findings, and Specific Challenges. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:7929286. [PMID: 28752098 PMCID: PMC5511670 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7929286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Recombinant immunotoxins (RITs) refer to a group of recombinant protein-based therapeutics, which consists of two components: an antibody variable fragment or a specific ligand that allows RITs to bind specifically to target cells and an engineered toxin fragment that kills the target cells upon internalization. To date, over 1,000 RITs have been generated and significant success has been achieved in the therapy of hematological malignancies. However, the immunogenicity and off-target toxicities of RITs remain as significant barriers for their application to solid tumor therapy. A group of RITs have also been generated for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, and some have demonstrated evidence of tumor response and an acceptable profile of toxicity and safety in early clinical trials. Different from other solid tumors, how to efficiently deliver the RITs to intracranial tumors is more critical and needs to be solved urgently. In this article, we first review the design and expression of RITs, then summarize the key findings in the preclinical and clinical development of RIT therapy of glioblastoma multiforme, and lastly discuss the specific issues that still remain to forward RIT therapy to clinical practice.
Collapse
|
65
|
Jiang K, Wang YP, Wang XD, Hui XB, Ding LS, Liu J, Liu D. Fms related tyrosine kinase 1 (Flt1) functions as an oncogene and regulates glioblastoma cell metastasis by regulating sonic hedgehog signaling. Am J Cancer Res 2017; 7:1164-1176. [PMID: 28560064 PMCID: PMC5446481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Studies have shown that the abnormal expression of Fms related tyrosine kinase 1 (Flt1) is associated with multiple malignancies, yet its role in glioblastoma pathology remains to be elucidated. In this study, we investigated the role of Flt1 in regulating proliferation, migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells by establishing glioblastoma cell strains with constitutively silenced or elevated Flt1 expression. We demonstrate that ectopic expression of Flt1 promotes glioblastoma cells migration, invasion through cell scratching and Transwell assays. Further study has indicated that Flt1 knockdown prevents the spread of glioblastoma cells in vivo. Conversely, we also show that suppression of Flt1 expression inhibits migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells. Finally, our findings demonstrate that Flt1 promotes invasion and migration of glioblastoma cells through sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway. Our study suggests that galectin-1 represents a crucial regulator of glioblastoma cells metastasis. Thus, the detection and targeted treatment of Flt1-expressing cancer serves as a new therapeutic target for glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| | - Yan-Ping Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| | - Xiao-Bo Hui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| | - Lian-Shu Ding
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| | - Ji Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| | - Dai Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityHuai'an 223300, China
| |
Collapse
|