ACBP and cholesterol differentially alter fatty acyl CoA utilization by microsomal ACAT

Liver fatty acid binding protein is required for high rates of hepatic fatty acid oxidation but not for the action of PPARalpha in fasting mice

Liver fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) has been proposed to limit the availability of long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) for oxidation and for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha), a fatty acid binding transcription factor that determines the capacity of hepatic fatty acid oxidation. Here, we used L-FABP null mice to test this hypothesis. Under fasting conditions, this mutation reduced beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) plasma levels as well as BHB release and palmitic acid oxidation by isolated hepatocytes. However, the capacity for ketogenesis was not reduced: BHB plasma levels were restored by octanoate injection; BHB production and palmitic acid oxidation were normal in liver homogenates; and hepatic expression of key PPAR-alpha target (MCAD, mitochondrial HMG CoA synthase, ACO, CYP4A3) and other (CPT1, LCAD) genes of mitochondrial and extramitochondrial LCFA oxidation and ketogenesis remained at wild-type levels. During standard diet, mitochondrial HMG CoA synthase mRNA was selectively reduced in L-FABP null liver. These results suggest that under fasting conditions, hepatic L-FABP contributes to hepatic LCFA oxidation and ketogenesis by a nontranscriptional mechanism, whereas L-FABP can activate ketogenic gene expression in fed mice. Thus, the mechanisms whereby L-FABP affects fatty acid oxidation may vary with physiological condition.

Physical and Functional Interaction of Acyl-CoA-binding Protein with Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-4α

Although acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP) has been detected in the nucleus, the physiological significance of this observation is unknown. As shown herein for the first time, ACBP in the nucleus physically and functionally interacted with hepatocyte nuclear factor-4 alpha (HNF-4 alpha), a nuclear binding protein that regulates transcription of genes involved in both lipid and glucose metabolism. Five lines of evidence showed that ACBP bound HNF-4 alpha in vitro and in the nucleus of intact cells. (i) ACBP interaction with HNF-4 alpha elicited significant changes in secondary structure. (ii) ACBP and HNF-4 alpha were coimmunoprecipitated by antibodies to each protein. (iii) Double immunolabeling and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) of rat hepatoma cells and transfected COS-7 cells significantly colocalized ACBP and HNF-4 alpha within the nucleus and in the perinuclear region close to the nuclear membrane. (iv) LSCM fluorescence resonance energy transfer determined an intermolecular distance of 53 A between ACBP and HNF-4 alpha in rat hepatoma cell nuclei. (v) Immunogold electron microscopy detected ACBP within 43 A of HNF-4 alpha. These interactions were specific since ACBP did not interact with Sp1 or glucocorticoid receptor in these assays. The functional significance of ACBP interaction with HNF-4 alpha was evidenced by mammalian two-hybrid and transactivation assays. ACBP overexpression in COS-7 or rat hepatoma cells enhanced transactivation of an HNF-4 alpha-dependent luciferase reporter plasmid by 3.2- and 1.6-fold, respectively. In contrast, cotransfection with antisense ACBP expression vector inhibited transactivation. LSCM of the individual triple fluorescent-labeled (HNF-4 alpha, ACBP, and luciferase) rat hepatoma cells showed a high correlation (r2, 0.936) between the level of luciferase and the level of ACBP expression. In summary, ACBP physically interacted with HNF-4 alpha in vitro and in intact cells, although ACBP expression level directly correlated with HNF-4 alpha-mediated transactivation in individual cells.