Randomized trial of dose-intensity with single-agent carboplatin in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. London Gynaecological Oncology Group

Individualised dosing strategy for high-dose carboplatin in patients with germ cell cancer

In contrast to conventional chemotherapy, carboplatin is still dosed per unit of body surface area (BSA) in high-dose chemotherapy protocols in clinical practice. To individualise dosing, a population pharmacokinetic model for poor-risk germ cell tumour patients receiving 1500 mg m(-2) carboplatin was developed. The typical central volume of distribution (19.9 l) and typical clearance (110 ml min(-1)) corresponded approximately to the extracellular fluid space or glomerular filtration rate, respectively. The covariate analysis identified several patient-specific factors. Carboplatin clearance was significantly related to creatinine clearance and body height, explaining 73% of the interindividual variability. Thus, an equation to predict individual clearance prior to treatment was developed (CL=0.41 x creatinine clearance+1.05 x body height-124.4). The relative frequency of developing toxicity increased significantly with higher AUC values for different types of toxicity. In addition, overall nonhaematological toxicity correlated significantly with exposure of carboplatin, leading to the assessment of a target AUC. Based on the prediction of individual clearance and the definition of a target AUC associated with moderate toxicity, an individualised dosing equation is proposed. Retrospectively, the individualised dosing strategy would have led to a higher dose on average and a broader range to be administered, compared to empirical dosing per unit BSA in the high-dose setting.

Can patients with relapsed, previously untreated, stage I epithelial ovarian cancer be successfully treated with salvage therapy?

PURPOSE

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has been controversial. We have previously reported the cases of patients managed with a policy of observation only. We now present the salvage rate for the patients in that study who experienced relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-four patients with stage I EOC presenting between 1980 and 1994 received no adjuvant chemotherapy, but were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy at relapse. We calculated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort and the salvage rate for those who experienced relapse. We defined salvage as freedom from relapse for 5 years after platinum treatment.

RESULTS

Sixty-one (31%) of 194 patients experienced relapse, and 55 received platinum-based chemotherapy. Twenty-four percent were progression-free at 5 years after this treatment. Clear-cell histology and cyst rupture before the patients' original surgery were independent prognostic factors for PFS after salvage chemotherapy. The OS for all 194 patients is 72% at 10 years (median follow-up, 8.7 years), with an 80% disease-specific survival (DSS).

CONCLUSION

We have shown that some patients with stage I EOC can be successfully treated with a salvage chemotherapy regimen after a policy of observation only. Interestingly, approximately 30% of stage I patients who die within 10 years do so from causes other than EOC (OS, 72%; DSS, 80%). Our findings need to be taken into consideration when the results from recent randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in this patient population (International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm Trial 1/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm Trial) are being discussed with patients.

Optimizing primary chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Primary chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer includes the administration of a platinum agent (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Most patients (60% to 80%) experience subjective and objective evidence of a favorable response, with prolonged disease-free and overall survival being noted in a substantial subset of this population. Future investigative efforts will focus on the incorporation of new and novel antineoplastic agents into standard treatment, with the important goals of improving biologic activity, enhancing overall quality of life, and extending survival.

Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy

Ovarian cancer is responsible for 4% of deaths from cancer in women. Treatment comprises a combination of surgery and chemotherapy, but patients typically experience disease relapse within 2 years of the initial treatment. Further treatment can extend survival, although relapse eventually occurs again. A better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this drug resistance should allow treatment to be optimized, so that substantial improvements in the outlook for women with this disease can be achieved.

Phase II clinical trial of carboplatin and docetaxel in patients with metastatic ovarian cancer: active combination with low incidence of peripheral neuropathy

During the past 2 decades there have been chemotherapeutic advances in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, new drug combinations aimed at increasing response and survival and decreasing toxicities are under investigation. The aim of this phase II study is to determine the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 in combination with Carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 6, as first line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. 37 patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer were entered, and are currently evaluable for response and toxicity. Treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade III and IV toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 16.2%. Grade II and III sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred in 8.1% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy resolved in two patients and persisted for more than 10 months in one patient. An overall clinical response of 89% was documented (95% CI 74.5% to 96.9%). Carboplatin and docetaxel administered according to our protocol is an effective alternative to other existing platinum-taxane based combinations. This treatment is associated with low incidence of sensory peripheral neuropathy, which is generally associated with better patient compliance and quality of life.

Pilot evaluation of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by high-dose melphalan supported by peripheral blood stem cells in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel and one consolidation cycle of high-dose melphalan with all cycles supported by hematopoietic stem cells and cytokine, in previously untreated patients with optimally debulked stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Patients had histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer and optimal initial cytoreductive surgery. No prior chemotherapy was permitted. Adequate performance status, bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function was required. After being mobilized with cyclophosphamide 3 g/m(2), paclitaxel 300 mg/m(2), and filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were collected by leukapheresis. Patients received three cycles of carboplatin AUC 15 mg. min/ml iv, paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), and PBSC with filgrastim every 28 days, followed by one cycle of melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and hematopoietic support.

RESULTS

Nine patients entered the trial and received all planned cycles of chemotherapy. Of the eight patients who consented to surgical reassessment upon completing therapy, four had residual small-volume macroscopic disease, three had microscopic residual disease, and one had pathologic complete response. The estimated probability of a pathologic complete response was 12.5% (95% confidence interval: 0.3-52.7%). Hematologic toxicity was severe but manageable. Eleven of 45 cycles (24.4%) resulted in hospital admission for neutropenic fever, dehydration +/- diarrhea, syncope, or shortness of breath and pain secondary to tense ascites.

CONCLUSIONS

The low pathological complete response rate did not justify toxicity; thus, the study was closed. High-dose chemotherapy as first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer remains experimental and should be restricted to clinical trials.

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.

Systematic review of first-line chemotherapy for newly diagnosed postoperative patients with stage II, III, or IV epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal postoperative chemotherapy regimen for women with newly diagnosed stage II, III (micro or macro), or IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted to find randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses published between 1980 and April 2001.

RESULTS

A published meta-analysis found that, compared with non-platinum-based regimens, platinum, alone or in combination with other agents, improved survival when used as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. The meta-analysis did not detect a difference in efficacy between cisplatin and carboplatin. A published randomized trial of cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel did not detect a significant difference in survival between these regimens. In two randomized trials, treatment with paclitaxel plus cisplatin resulted in improved survival compared with cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin. A randomized trial of paclitaxel plus cisplatin versus paclitaxel alone versus cisplatin alone detected no differences in survival among the three treatment groups. While hematologic adverse effects were more frequent with carboplatin than with cisplatin, nonhematologic adverse effects were less frequent with carboplatin. The addition of paclitaxel to cisplatin did not appear to increase the incidence of serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous carboplatin plus paclitaxel is the recommended postoperative chemotherapy regimen for newly diagnosed stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel may also be considered a treatment option. Intravenous carboplatin as a single agent may be considered a treatment option in patients for whom paclitaxel is contraindicated or in patients who are unwilling to accept the adverse effects of paclitaxel chemotherapy.

Weekly cisplatin and oral etoposide as treatment for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Response rates to chemotherapy in relapsed, platinum resistant epithelial ovarian cancer remain poor. We have explored the effectiveness of weekly cisplatin combined with prolonged oral etoposide in this patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two women with relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer were treated with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36 and 43 and oral etoposide 50 mg given from day 1-14 and day 29-43. In those who were responding and tolerating treatment (n = 13) oral etoposide 50 mg was continued for two further cycles (days 1-21 repeated every 28 days). The interval since last platinum containing chemotherapy was > 6 months in 28 patients and < 6 months in 16 patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for response according to CA 125 criteria giving an overall response rate of 44%. The response rate in evaluable patients declined with increasing numbers of previous treatments: 57% with one prior treatment, 42% with two, 40% with three or more. The response rate in patients who had received platinum chemotherapy within six months prior to treatment was 46%. The only significant non-haematological toxicity was nausea and vomiting in 4 patients who experienced greater than grade 2 toxicity. The number of patients experiencing haematological toxicity more than grade 2 was as follows: haemoglobin 3, white blood count 12, platelets 6. Sixteen patients had dose delays and two had dose reductions.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that this short but intensive regimen provides worthwhile response rates, even in those patients who would ordinarily be considered refractory to platinum, and has an acceptable toxicity profile.

Current and future potential roles of the platinum drugs in the treatment of ovarian cancer

The discovery of cisplatin more than two decades ago was the most important therapeutic advance in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Today, cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel is the most commonly used first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Although platinum drugs remain a critical component of chemotherapy in this type of cancer, cumulative toxicities can limit their use. These toxicities include nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity with cisplatin and myelosuppression with carboplatin. Although these adverse events can often be managed, the interventions themselves can complicate and add to the costs of treatment. Importantly, acquired resistance to traditional platinum drugs often develops in patients with ovarian cancer and can limit the usefulness of these drugs. Research into new platinum drugs has focused on identifying compounds with improved tolerability profiles and, importantly, those which can circumvent mechanisms of platinum resistance. New platinum drugs currently under development that are showing promise in ovarian cancer include oxaliplatin, nedaplatin, satraplatin, BBR3464 and ZD0473. If the encouraging in vitro activity shown by new compounds, such as ZD0473 and BBR3464, translates into efficacy in the clinic, they may offer an extended spectrum of activity which includes patients with ovarian cancer resistant to the classical platinum drugs.

High-dose chemotherapy as a consolidation approach in advanced ovarian cancer: long-term results

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term impact of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as consolidation in a large series (n = 55) of advanced chemosensitive ovarian cancer patients who were optimally cytoreduced at time of first surgery or at interval debulking surgery (IDS). HDC consisted of carboplatin (600 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2), etoposide (450 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2) and melphalan (50 mg/m(2), days 3 and 4). The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). In September 2000 the overall population had a median follow-up of 55 months (range 17--137) and a TTP of 35 months with a 5-year TTP rate of 35% (CI 95%: 21--49) whereas OS averaged 75 months with a 5-year OS of 59% (CI 95%: 45--73). In patients achieving optimal primary cytoreduction the median TTP was 44 months with a 5-year rate of 43% (CI 95%: 26--60). In the same series the 5-year OS rate was 62% (CI 95%: 45--79) (median OS = 75 months). In patients who were optimally cytoreduced at the time of IDS the median TTP was 25 months and the 5-year TTP rate was 22% (CI 95%: 3--41) and median OS was 46 months with a 5-year OS rate of 50% (CI 95%: 27--73). HDC with hematopoietic support could represent an effective approach for the treatment of advanced optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer patients with chemosensitive disease. Patients who underwent IDS because of unresectable tumors at the time of first surgery had the greater survival benefit from HDC.

Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE

In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached.

CONCLUSION

When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.

Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and docetaxel in the treatment of cancers of the ovary and fallopian tube and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum

PURPOSE

Standard chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer currently includes a platinum agent (usually carboplatin) and paclitaxel. Because docetaxel is an active agent in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, it is relevant to evaluate both the toxicity and efficacy of the combination of carboplatin and docetaxel in this clinical setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Gynecologic Oncology Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center conducted a phase II trial of carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 6) and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)), delivered every 3 weeks for six courses, in patients with ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and primary carcinoma of the peritoneum who had either received no prior chemotherapy or had experienced a treatment-free interval of greater than 2 years before developing disease recurrence.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (median age, 57 years; range, 44 to 81 years) entered the trial (47 had had no prior chemotherapy). Our toxicity findings included the following: grade 4 neutropenia (64% of patients); hypersensitivity reactions (34%, none requiring discontinuation of therapy); peripheral neuropathy (6%). We had objective responses for 32 of 42 (81%) assessable patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of carboplatin and docetaxel is highly active in ovarian cancer, with the major toxicity being bone marrow suppression. Hypersensitivity reactions are frequent but do not prevent continuation of treatment. With the dose and schedule employed in this trial, neurotoxicity is uncommon. Defining a role for this regimen in routine clinical practice will require the conduct of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Ovarian cancer chemotherapy

The treatment of ovarian cancer has evolved over the past two decades from one of palliation to one where patients can achieve prolonged remission and cure. Although prognosis remains poor, it has improved with the intervention of a multidisciplinary team and greater site specialization in the organization of cancer services. The introduction of new chemotherapy agents both as first line treatment and on relapse has had a benefit in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival. In this review we describe first-line therapy, including the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, the importance of dose and dose intensity in platinum agents and the treatment of refractory and relapsed disease. Finally the review focuses on important prognostic factors and how these can be used to predict outcome.

Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To compare the progression-free and overall survival in small-volume residual ovarian cancer after treatment with intravenous (IV) cisplatin and paclitaxel or an experimental regimen of IV carboplatin followed by IV paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either IV paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 24 hours followed by IV cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six courses or IV carboplatin (area under curve 9) every 28 days for two courses, then IV paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) over 24 hours followed by intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six courses.

RESULTS

Of the 523 patients who entered this trial, 462 were determined to be assessable, with prognostic factors well balanced between the treatments. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal and metabolic toxicities were greater in the experimental arm. As a result, 18% of the patients received < or = two courses of IP therapy. Progression-free survival was superior for patients randomized to the experimental treatment arm (median, 28 v 22 months; relative risk, 0.78; log-rank P =.01, one-tail). There was a borderline improvement in overall survival associated with this regimen (median, 63 v 52 months; relative risk, 0.81; P =.05, one-tail).

CONCLUSION

An experimental regimen including moderately high-dose IV carboplatin followed by IP paclitaxel and IV cisplatin yielded a significant improvement in progression-free survival when compared with a standard regimen of IV cisplatin and paclitaxel. Because the improvement in overall survival was of borderline statistical significance and toxicity was greater, the experimental arm is not recommended for routine use. However, the results provide direction for further clinical investigation in small-volume ovarian cancer.

Prospective validation of renal function-based carboplatin dosing in children with cancer: A United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Trial

PURPOSE

Carboplatin dosing in adults with cancer is based on renal function. The purpose of the current study was to validate a previously developed pediatric carboplatin-dosing formula.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight pediatric patients were randomized to receive a carboplatin dose calculated according to surface area or a renal function-based dosing formula. On the next course of therapy, the alternative dosing method was used for each patient. Carboplatin pharmacokinetics (based on free plasma platinum concentrations) were measured after both courses.

RESULTS

The mean observed areas under the carboplatin concentration-versus-time curve (AUCs) after renal function- and surface area-based dosing were 98% and 95% of the target AUCs, respectively. The variation in the observed AUC was significantly less after renal function-based dosing (F test, P =.02), such that 74% of courses had an observed AUC within +/- 20% of the target value, versus 49% for courses after dosing according to surface area. Only one of 22 courses at the center with the most experience with renal function-based dosing was associated with an AUC outside +/- 20% of the target value, versus nine of 22 courses after surface area-based dosing in the same center. There was a relationship (r(2) =.71) between carboplatin AUC and thrombocytopenia in 10 neuroblastoma patients treated with a combination of carboplatin, vincristine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide.

CONCLUSION

Renal function-based carboplatin dosing in children results in more consistent drug exposure than surface area-based drug administration.

Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents

The current practice for the dose calculation of most anticancer agents is based on body surface area in m2, although lower interpatient variation in pharmacokinetic parameters has been reported with pharmacokinetically guided administration. As chemotherapeutic agents have a narrow therapeutic window, pharmacokinetically guided administration may lead to less toxicity and higher efficacy than administration on the basis of body surface area. Pharmacokinetically guided administration, using parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), steady-state plasma drug concentration and drug exposure time above a certain plasma concentration, has been studied for many antineoplastic agents. Assessment of pharmacokinetic profiles allows the characterisation of relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy and toxicity. AUC appears to be more closely correlated with pharmacodynamics than does the dose per unit of body surface area. In particular, the AUC-guided administration of carboplatin has been extensively studied, based on the close relationship between the renal clearance of the drug and glomerular filtration rate. Several formulae and limited sampling models have been derived to predict the AUC of carboplatin. The relationship between AUC and pharmacodynamics has also been studied for other anticancer agents, for example fluorouracil, topotecan, etoposide, cisplatin and busulfan, but all less extensively than for carboplatin. The pharmacokinetically guided administration of these agents needs to be investigated further before the use of alternative administration formulae can become standard clinical practice. Prospective studies of pharmacokinetically guided versus surface area-based administration should be performed to validate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and to facilitate optimal dosage of anticancer agents in the clinic.

High-dose platinum versus standard dose in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a randomized trial from the Gynecologic Cooperative Group of the French Comprehensive Cancer Centers (FNCLCC)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of platinum dose intensity on pathological response rate and overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between February 1992 and December 1996, 195 previously untreated patients with FIGO stage IIb-c, IIIb-c, or IV with macroscopic residual disease after suboptimal debulking surgery were randomized to receive CCC (100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin, 300 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide, 300 mg/m(2) of carboplatin, n = 96) or CC (100 mg/m(2) of cisplatin, 600 mg/m(2) of cyclophosphamide, n = 99) for six courses at 28-day intervals. A second-look laparotomy was planned at the end of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In the CCC arm, the platinum compound received dose intensity and relative total dose were 85 and 76%; in the CC arm, they were 94 and 85%. Grade 3-4 toxicity was more frequent in the CCC arm than in the CC arm for leukopenia (56% vs 26%, P < 0.001), febrile neutropenia (18% vs 4%, P = 0.002), anemia (31% vs 5%, P < 0.001), thrombopenia (55% vs 4%, P < 0.001), and ototoxicity (8% vs 0%, P < 0.001). The pathologic complete response rate was 22 and 14% in the CCC and CC arms, respectively (P = 0.19). With a median follow-up of 53 months, the median time to failure and the 3-year treatment failure-free survival rate were 17.4 months and 22% vs 13 months and 11% in the two arms, respectively (P = 0.01). The median survival time and the 3-year overall survival rate were, respectively, 30 months and 42% vs 25 months and 33% (P < 0.20).

CONCLUSION

The platinum dose intensification (1.6-fold increase) obtained with the CCC association improves the treatment failure-free survival without significant impact on overall survival when compared with the CC regimen in suboptimal debulked ovarian adenocarcinoma. However, because of its high rate of hematologic toxicity and ototoxicity, this association cannot be recommended for routine practice.

Exploratory phase III study of paclitaxel and cisplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the side effects and feasibility of cisplatin and carboplatin each in combination with paclitaxel as front-line therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) intravenously as a 3-hour infusion followed by either cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) or carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 5), both on day 1. The schedule was repeated every 3 weeks for at least six cycles. Women allocated to paclitaxel-cisplatin were admitted to the hospital, whereas the carboplatin regimen was administered to outpatients.

RESULTS

A total of 208 eligible patients were randomized. Both regimens could be delivered in an optimal dose and without significant delay. Paclitaxel-carboplatin produced significantly less nausea and vomiting (P: <.01) and less peripheral neurotoxicity (P: =.04) but more granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia (P: <.01). The overall response rate in 132 patients with measurable disease was 64% (84 of 132 patients), and in patients with elevated CA 125 levels at start, it was 74% (132 of 178 patients). With a median follow-up time of 37 months, the median progression-free survival time of all patients was 16 months and the median overall survival time was 31 months. The small number of patients entered onto the study caused wide confidence intervals (CIs) around the hazards ratio for progression-free survival of paclitaxel-carboplatin compared with paclitaxel-cisplatin (hazards ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.48) and did not allow conclusions about efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel-carboplatin is a feasible regimen for outpatients with ovarian cancer and has a better toxicity profile than paclitaxel-cisplatin.

An adenovirus encoding proapoptotic Bax induces apoptosis and enhances the radiation effect in human ovarian cancer

Overexpression of proapoptotic Bax favors death in cells resistant to ionizing radiation. We hypothesized that expression of Bax via adenoviral-mediated gene delivery could sensitize radiation-refractory cells to radiotherapy. An inducible Bax recombinant adenovirus (Ad/Bax) had been generated using the Cre/loxp system. Human ovarian cancer cell lines and primary, patient-derived cancer cells from ascites were irradiated and infected with the Ad/Bax and an expression-inducing vector, Ad/Cre. Cell death was evaluated by crystal violet staining, fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of Annexin V, and colony formation assay (cell lines only). To further characterize the mechanism of death, cell morphology was examined by nuclear staining with Hoechst 33258. Lastly, to evaluate the capacity of the combined treatment to inhibit tumor growth, mice were injected subcutaneously with ovarian cancer cells exposed to Bax, radiation therapy (RT), or both, and tumor size was measured periodically. Infection of the cancer cell lines and primary cells with both Ad/Bax and Ad/Cre significantly enhanced sensitivity to ionizing radiation, achieving high levels of cell killing in short-term assays. In addition, the combination of Bax and radiotherapy reduced the survival fraction of cell lines 2 logs in standard colony-forming assays. Investigation into the involved mechanism suggests that Bax-mediated radiosensitization occurs through both apoptosis and necrosis pathways. Further, mice subcutaneously injected with ovarian tumor cells previously treated with radiation, or with radiation and irrelevant viruses, consistently developed tumor nodules. In addition, approximately 80% of injections were followed by tumor formation after treatment with Ad/Bax and Ad/Cre alone. In contrast, tumor formation was completely inhibited after combined treatment with Ad/Bax and Ad/Cre and radiation. Augmentation of the effect of radiotherapy on human ovarian cancer cells and primary cancer cells from patients via a recombinant adenovirus encoding Bax is feasible.

Phase I trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide with granulocyte colony stimulating factor as first-line therapy for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine the maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) of carboplatin, paclitaxel (Taxol), etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (CTEC) with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, Filgrastim) support as first-line chemotherapy in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients with either stage IV EOC, or stage III EOC and any amount of gross residual tumor after surgical debulking were eligible to receive six cycles of CTEC over five different dose levels in this phase I trial (planned 21-day cycle length). Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide were administered intravenously on Day 1, and oral etoposide was administered on Days 1, 2, and 3. G-CSF was administered beginning Day 4.

RESULTS

Twenty patients received a total of 98 cycles of CTEC over the five dose levels evaluated. Bone marrow suppression was the major toxic effect, with grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia being observed in 25 and 23% of cycles, respectively. The overall incidence of febrile neutropenia was 10%, and no toxic deaths occurred. No grade IV thrombocytopenia or febrile neutropenia was observed once the carboplatin dose was reduced from AUC of 7 to 5. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild (grade 2 or less). Dose-limiting toxicity was not observed at the highest dose level evaluated in this study, preventing assignment of the MTD. The clinical complete response rate was 92%, although 15 of 16 evaluable patients have progressed with a median progression-free interval of 4 months (range, 2-11 months). One patient remains disease-free 9 months from the completion of CTEC.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTEC regimen is well tolerated and highly active. Although the MTD was not reached in this study, the short median progression-free interval suggests that this regimen is unlikely to be superior to standard treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Strategies to optimize the development of future combination chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer are discussed.

Optimum chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

A series of prospective randomized trials recently have defined the new standard of care for chemotherapy patients with ovarian cancer. The current preferred regimen consists of carboplatin (dosed to an area-under-the-curve [AUC] of 5.0-7.5) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2-3 h infusion). This is an outpatient regimen that does not require growth factor support and six cycles are administered on a 21-day schedule. There is no evidence that any type of additional therapy impacts upon survival, including additional cycles of the same chemotherapy or switching to an alternative intravenous chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with hematologic support, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, or whole abdominal radiation. The majority of patients will achieve a clinical complete remission with the regimen although the relapse rate remains high. Current trials are exploring new schedules of drug delivery as well as new combinations which include new agents such as gemcitabine and topotecan.

Mature results of a prospective randomized trial comparing a three-weekly with an accelerated weekly schedule of cisplatin in advanced ovarian carcinoma

In a retrospective analysis of a series of clinical trials by Levin and Hryniuk in 1987, the average relative dose intensity of first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer correlated significantly with clinical response and survival, and cisplatin was the only drug for which the outcome correlated with the individual drug relative dose intensity. There was a need to test whether and to what extent this evidence would be confirmed in a prospective evaluation. In this study 101 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma were randomized to receive the same total dose of cisplatin but at the conventional 3-weekly schedule (CTWS) (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for six cycles) (51 patients) or at an experimental accelerated weekly schedule (AWS) (100 mg/m2 every week for two triplets of three cycles separated by a 5-week interval) (50 patients). To benefit from a multidrug regimen at the same extent, patients in both arms sequentially received four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. The median follow-up period of this study is 9.7 years. In 42 and 40 patients of the two arms having evaluable response, the clinical complete response rates to cisplatin were 14% and 22% and the complete plus partial response rates were 48% and 55% in the CTWS and in the AWS arm, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. However, the survival curves were similar during the first 2 years but clearly diverged thereafter in favor of the AWS arm (p = 0.07). At 5 years, 12% and 30% of the patients were still alive in the CTWS and in the AWS arm, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was not relevant in either arm of the study. Nonhematologic toxicity, especially ototoxicity, was substantial and significantly higher in the AWS arm. Although statistically nonsignificant, this AWS regimen of cisplatin is associated with long-term better survival compared to the CTWS regimen in advanced ovarian carcinoma. This accelerated approach administering cisplatin should be further investigated, especially in patients with low residual disease after primary surgery.

Dose-intensive approaches to ovarian cancer

Increasing the total dose or the dose intensity of platinum does not improve survival in women with ovarian cancer. High-dose chemotherapy with hematologic support has not been shown to be more effective than standard-dose chemotherapy. Regional dose intensity, through intraperitoneal chemotherapy, may have a role in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Further studies are needed to identify the optimal combination of agents, in addition to a platinum and a taxane, to be used in primary therapy for ovarian cancer.

Phase I trial of multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy supported by autologous peripheral-blood stem cells

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and feasibility of delivering multiple cycles of front-line high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel with hematopoietic peripheral-blood stem cell (PBSC) support.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were required to have a malignant solid tumor for which they had received no prior chemotherapy. Mobilization of PBSC was achieved with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). After one cycle of conventional-dose carboplatin and cyclophosphamide with GM-CSF, patients received multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 12 to 20) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) with PBSC and GM-CSF repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 28 patients were assessable for toxicity and clinical outcome. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, and electrolyte imbalances. The maximum-tolerated dose of carboplatin was AUC 16 (equivalent to a median of 1,189 mg/m(2)). The relationship of target AUC to measured AUC was linear (r(2) =. 29; P =.0011). The overall response rate was 96%, with a complete clinical response rate of 67%. The median time to progression from the first PBSC reinfusion was 49.5 weeks (range, 8 to 156+ weeks).

CONCLUSION

Multiple cycles of high-dose carboplatin (AUC 16) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) can be safely administered with GM-CSF and PBSC support. Although this regimen is safe, feasible, and active, the use of multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy as front-line treatment remains experimental and should only be used in the context of a clinical trial.

A dose-finding study of nedaplatin and cyclophosphamide for patients with gynecological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Nedaplatin is a new analogue of cisplatin with similar efficacy but less renal toxicity. We investigated the appropriate dose of nedaplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide for patients with gynecological malignancies.

METHODS

Nine patients (five with ovarian cancer and four with uterine cervical cancer) were studied. Three patients received 60 mg/m2 of nedaplatin combined with 500 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide every 4 weeks. Another three patients were each administered 80 or 100 mg/m2 of nedaplatin with the same dose of cyclophosphamide. A total of 27 courses was given.

RESULTS

No patient needed dose reduction due to myelosuppression and no severe adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with 100 mg/m2 of nedaplatin and 500 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide is feasible for patients with gynecological malignancies. However, phase II studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of this combination chemotherapy.

High dose chemotherapeutic strategies in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma

High dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue has been used in an attempt to overcome chemotherapy resistance and increase survival in patients with poor prognosis epithelial ovarian cancer. Untreated patients with advanced stage disease and those with chemosensitive recurrent disease do better in terms of response rates as well as duration of response and overall survival. Newer strategies using multiple cycles of dose intense therapy may improve results although it will be difficult to document changes in the natural history of advanced ovarian cancer without the completion of randomized phase III trials.