Results of treatment after relapse from high-dose chemotherapy in germ cell tumors

Irinotecan in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a phase II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

Despite generally high cure rates in patients with metastatic germ cell cancer, patients with progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy or with relapsed disease following high-dose salvage therapy exhibit a very poor prognosis. Irinotecan has shown antitumour activity in human testicular tumour xenografts in nude mice. We have performed a phase II study examining the single agent activity of irinotecan in patients with metastatic relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer. Refractory disease was defined as progression or relapse within 4 weeks after cisplatin-based chemotherapy or relapse after salvage high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 300 (-350) mg m(-2) every 3 weeks. Response was evaluated every 4 weeks. Fifteen patients have been enrolled. Median age was 35 (19-53) years. Primary tumour localisation was gonadal/mediastinal in 12/3 patients. Patients had been pretreated with a median of six (4-12) cisplatin-containing cycles and 13 out of 15 patients had previously failed high-dose chemotherapy with blood stem cell support. Median number of irinotecan applications was two (1-3). Fourteen patients are assessable for response and all for toxicity. In one patient, no adequate response evaluation was performed. Toxicity was generally acceptable and consisted mainly of haematological side effects with common toxicity criteria 3 degrees anaemia (two patients), common toxicity criteria 3 degrees leukocytopenia (one patient) and common toxicity criteria 3 degrees thrombocytopenia (three patients). Common toxicity criteria 3/4 degrees non-haematological toxicity occurred in five patients (33%): 1 x diarrhoea, 2 x alopecia, 1 x fever and in one patient worsening of pre-existing peripheral polyneuropathy from 1 degrees to 4 degrees. No response was observed to irinotecan therapy. Currently, 13 patients have died of the disease and two patients are alive with the disease. The patients included in our study exhibit similar prognostic characteristics as patients treated in previous trials evaluating new drugs in this setting. Irinotecan at a dose of 300-350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks appears to have no antitumour activity in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer and, thus, further investigation in this disease is not justified.

Absence of c-KIT and members of the epidermal growth factor receptor family in refractory germ cell cancer

BACKGROUND

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) in adolescent and young males are very sensitive to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, 10-20% of the patients cannot be cured by currently available therapeutic options. Once a tumor does not respond to cisplatin, current therapeutic modalities offer only a chance for short palliation. Recently, new treatment options that interfere with various receptor tyrosine kinases, including c-KIT and members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family, have been used successfully in chemotherapy-resistant tumors overexpressing c-KIT, ERB-B2, or EGFR.

METHODS

We studied the presence of c-KIT and the four members of the EGFR family by immunohistochemistry, as well as by ERB-B2 gene amplification using fluorescent in situ hybridization, in a series of 22 patients with cisplatin-resistant GCTs in search of new treatment targets. The results in these refractory tumors were compared with those of 12 patients with chemosensitive GCTs diagnosed in an advanced metastatic stage.

RESULTS

The data obtained in both groups did not differ in any of the investigated biologic markers. c-KIT was detected in the one case of pure seminoma studied and in the seminomatous components of combined tumors. The presence of EGFR was restricted to trophoblastic giant cells and the syncytiotrophoblastic elements of four nonseminomas including one pure choriocarcinoma and to a secondary non-germ cell malignancy, which had developed most likely from a mature teratoma. ERB-B2 was moderately positive in the secondary non-germ cell malignancy, in one mature teratoma component of a mixed nonseminoma, and together with EGFR in the syncytiotrophoblastic cells of a pure choriocarcinoma. Of all samples investigated, this latter case was the only one showing an amplification of the ERB-B2 gene in the syncytiotrophoblasts. ERB-B3 and ERB-B4 were detected rarely.

CONCLUSION

The majority of refractory GCTs do not qualify for treatment with new biologic agents targeting the receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR, ERB-B2, or c-KIT. The lack of differences between the tumors of refractory and the responsive patients indicates that overexpression of any of these receptor tyrosine kinases does not contribute to a resistant phenotype in GCTs.

Activity of oxaliplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohaxane platinum derivative with incomplete cross-resistance to cisplatin in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with nonseminomatous cisplatin-refractory germ cell cancer or relapsed disease after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) plus autologous stem-cell support were treated with single-agent oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 repeated every 4 weeks (group 1; n = 16) or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week cycle (group 2; n = 16). Patients were pretreated with a median of seven (range, three to 13) cisplatin-containing treatment cycles; 78% had received carboplatin/etoposide-based HDCT before oxaliplatin therapy. Twenty-seven patients (84%) were considered refractory (n = 20; 63%) or absolutely refractory (n = 7; 22%) to cisplatin therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, four patients achieved a partial remission (13%; 95% confidence interval, 1% to 24%). Two additional patients achieved disease stabilization. All responses were observed in cisplatin-refractory patients, including three who had not responded to previous HDCT. Patients received a median two cycles of oxaliplatin with a median cumulative dose of 350 mg/m(2). Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, with five patients developing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematologic side effects consisted mainly of nausea/vomiting. One patient developed grade 3 neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Considering the particularly unfavorable prognostic characteristics of this patient population compared with patients from previous trials for new drugs in germ cell cancer, eg, paclitaxel and gemcitabine, a 13% overall response rate and a 19% response rate in the group treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) seems to be of interest. Oxaliplatin may be a palliative treatment option for this patient population, and evaluation in combination regimens is warranted.

Phase II study of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in refractory germ cell tumors (E9897): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

Despite great success in the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumors, 20% of patients are incurable and become candidates for investigational therapy. Paclitaxel and gemcitabine have shown activity as single agents in refractory germ cell tumors and can be combined with manageable toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with germ cell tumors believed to be incurable with chemotherapy or surgery were treated with paclitaxel 110 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle for a maximum of six cycles. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 30 enrolled patients were assessable. Toxicity was primarily hematologic but was manageable with only a single case of neutropenic fever. Six (21.4%) of 28 patients responded, including three complete responses. Two of the complete responders were continuously disease-free at 15+ and 25+ months.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine is an active regimen in refractory germ cell tumors, with an acceptable toxicity profile. This regimen has the possibility for long-term disease-free survival in this refractory patient population.

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for advanced testicular cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) for the treatment of patients with advanced testicular cancer.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were treated with high-dose carboplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide (with or without THP-adriamycin) followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The treatment was used for two refractory cases, a second relapse, and for consolidation after the first relapse in one case each. It was also used for nine cases as part of the first-line treatment following primary conventional-dose chemotherapy, and for one case as the first salvage for a late recurrent tumor of teratoma with malignant transformation.

RESULTS

The first two patients who received intensive pretreatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy did not respond to HDCT. The two patients who were treated with HDCT as the first or second salvage therapy achieved successful outcomes. The results for the subsequent nine patients (consisting of two with stage IIIC, five with IIIB2, one with IIB, and one extragonadal seminoma) were two progressive disease, three no change and four partial remission. Only three are alive with NED following salvage surgery. Finally, a case of teratoma with malignant transformation did not respond well to two cycles of HDCT. There were no marked adverse reactions except one episode of severe neutropenic colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated the limited efficacy of HDCT even in cases with a good to intermediate risk rating according to classification by the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. Because treatment for relapse after HDCT is extremely difficult, new HDCT regimens consisting of drugs that are not used in induction chemotherapy need to be established.

Importance of surgery as salvage treatment after high dose chemotherapy failure in germ cell tumors

PURPOSE

The survival of patients with germ cell cancer after failed high dose chemotherapy is poor. We retrospectively reviewed the various treatment choices in this situation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 1986 to July 1996, 32 patients had disease progression after high dose cisplatin based chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem cell support. Patients received high dose chemotherapy in the first line (11) or salvage (21) setting.

RESULTS

There was relapse after a complete or partial marker negative response after high dose chemotherapy in 19 cases at a median time to disease progression of 7 months (range 1.5 to 72). Salvage treatment involved chemotherapy alone in 5 cases, chemotherapy plus surgery in 6, surgery plus radiotherapy in 3, surgery alone in 2, combined radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery in 1, and no treatment in 1 due to a rapid disease course. The most common chemotherapy regimen was combined vinorelbine, ifosfamide and epirubicin. Eight patients achieved a complete response with the resection of all residual disease. At long-term followup 2 patients have been continuously disease-free for 84 and 109 months, respectively. After high dose chemotherapy 13 patients had evidence of disease, including 4 with a partial marker positive response and 9 with progressive disease. Salvage treatment involved chemotherapy plus surgery in 6 cases, chemotherapy alone in 2, no treatment in 2, and radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone and surgery alone in 1 each. One patient with progressive disease and 3 with a partial marker positive response achieved a complete response after salvage surgery, and combined surgery and high dose chemotherapy, respectively. These 4 patients have been continuously free of disease for 105, 95, 92 and 72 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Six of the 32 patients with relapse or progressive disease after high dose chemotherapy have been free of disease in the long term. The most effective treatment was the resection of all residual masses. Chemotherapy had only marginal activity and the efficacy of radiotherapy seems to have been nil.

Testicular cancer

A report of a 5-year survival rate of 39% for all patients with testis cancer in Kenya contrasts sharply with the 62% 5-year survival rate after tandem high-dose chemotherapy in first-line salvage of metastatic nonseminoma, and this figure provides a stark reminder of the differences in level of health care in the world. Nothing matches, however, the international significance of the success of Lance Armstrong in winning the Tour de France for the second time. It brings home the message of how complete the cure of this disease is and the need for more to be done to educate people about this success and encourage us to seek to discover the scientific basis for why this cancer is so different from all other cancers. The discovery that Lance Armstrong's brain metastases were totally necrotic at day 21 after the first treatment, taken with a report on the use of day 21 computed tomograph response to predict outcome, reinforces that message. With a second report suggesting that there are regions of the world that may have escaped the environmental damage to fertility that is now increasingly accepted as the most significant risk factor for development of this disease, we also need to remember the importance of germ cells as a weather vane of the environment. The first breakthrough in identifying a specific genetic region on the X chromosome with susceptibility to germ cell cancer of the testis by its association with development of undescended testis was one of the scientific landmarks of this past year. Clinically, with such high cure rates after salvage treatments, most of the controversy focuses now on early management of this disease. Debate continues regarding the need for orchidectomy or node dissection before chemotherapy in patients with metastases. There is also considerable debate concerning the need for any adjuvant treatment in stage 1 disease, whether surgical, chemotherapeutic, or radiotherapeutic. With reviews on late events highlighting the possibility that cisplatin dosage may be critical in synergizing with etoposide in causing leukemia and late cardiovascular events and reports suggesting that circulating cisplatin can be detected in the plasma as long as 20 years after treatment, the message of the year is clearly how to safely minimize the amount of treatment.

Intensive and timely chemotherapy, the key of success in testicular cancer

More than 90% of patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT) are curable since the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but only half of them with poor-risk characteristics and less than a quarter after the first relapse are cured by conventional chemotherapy. In this review, we have studied the results of dose-intensity in conventional chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in the treatment of GCT patients. In first line, only one randomized trial of HDCT was performed and no benefit was demonstrated. One US randomized trial is ongoing. In first salvage treatment, no randomized trial was performed, and a European trial (IT94) is ongoing. In the refractory situation, there is no indication of high-dose chemotherapy. In conclusion, high-dose chemotherapy is not a standard treatment for different situations. New strategies are needed to improve the survival rate of poor prognosis germ cell tumor patients.