Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on survival in patients with AIDS-associated pulmonary Kaposi's sarcoma treated with chemotherapy

AIDS-related Kaposi's Sarcoma: evaluation of potential new prognostic factors and assessment of the AIDS Clinical Trial Group Staging System in the Haart Era--the Italian Cooperative Group on AIDS and Tumors and the Italian Cohort of Patients Naive From Antiretrovirals

PURPOSE

To assess potential new prognostic factors and to validate the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) for AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS) staging system in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected epidemiologic, clinical, staging, and survival data from 211 patients with AIDS-KS enrolled in two prospective Italian human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cohort studies. We included in the analysis all patients with the diagnosis of KS made from January 1996, the time at which HAART became available in Italy.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis, survival was not influenced by sex, age, level of HIV viremia at KS diagnosis, HAART at KS diagnosis (HAART-naïve v HAART-experienced), or type of HAART combination. Regarding ACTG classification, the 3-year survival rate was 85% for T0 patients and 69% for T1 patients (P =.007), 83% for S0 patients and 63% for S1 patients (P =.003), and 83% for I0 patients and 71% for I1 patients (P =.06). In the multivariate analysis, only the combination of poor tumor stage (T1) and poor systemic disease (S1) risk identified patients with unfavorable prognosis. The 3-year survival rate of patients with T1S1 was 53%, which was significantly lower compared with the 3-year survival rates of patients with T0S0, T1S0, and T0S1, which were 88%, 80%, and 81%, respectively (P =.0001).

CONCLUSION

In the era of HAART, a refinement of the original ACTG staging system is needed. CD4 level does not seem to provide prognostic information. Two different risk categories are identified: a good risk (T0S0, T1S0, T0S1) and a poor risk (T1S1).

A comparison of regimens based on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors in preventing Kaposi's sarcoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) in a prospective longitudinal cohort of HIV-1-infected individuals before during and after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and to compare the incidence of KS between specific HAART regimens.

DESIGN

Univariate and multivariate analysis of 8640 HIV-1-infected individuals.

METHODS

The protective effect of HAART regimens based on either protease inhibitors (PI) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) on the development of KS was examined in prospectively recorded data to determine whether treatments based on the two types of drug were comparable with regard to a reduction in the incidence of KS.

RESULTS

A total of 1204 patients with KS were identified. The incidence of KS decreased from 30/1000 patient-years prior to 1995 to 0.03/1000 patient-years in 2001. Multivariate analysis showed that age, nadir CD4 cell count and antiretroviral class exposure were significant independent predictors of KS. NNRTI-based HAART (adjusted rate ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.37) had a similar protective effect to PI-based HAART (adjusted rate ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.58). Most patients who develop KS on HAART [30/35 (86%)] had evidence of virological treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

PI- and NNRTI-based HAART regimens are equally effective as protection against KS. This is the first study to demonstrate a decreased incidence of an AIDS-defining disease with NNRTI-based therapy.

Clinical presentations and standard therapy of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma

The treatment plan for a patient with AIDS-related KS should be based on tumor characteristics, control of HIV infection, comorbidities, and patient treatment goals (see Table 1). Institution of optimal antiretroviral therapy is an essential component of KS therapy. When available, enrollment in a clinical trial should be considered, except for patients who are naive to chemotherapy with symptomatic or life-threatening KS. For a patient with minimal, indolent cutaneous disease, after optimal control of HIV replication, local treatment, investigational treatment, or interferon are reasonable considerations. For the patient with rapidly progressive, cutaneous disease, tumor-related symptoms, or visceral disease, cytotoxic chemotherapy in combination with antiretroviral therapy is the first consideration. Future advances undoubtedly will include pathogenesis-based agents, either alone or in combination with currently available cytotoxic therapy.

Recent advances in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma

Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is the most common malignancy associated with HIV infection and is considered an AIDS defining condition by the US Centers of Disease Control Guidelines. Several advances in the treatment of AIDS-related KS have been achieved over the past few years, even though a gold standard therapy for KS has not yet been defined and treatment must be tailored to individual needs. Since the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), a dramatic clinical response has been documented in patients with KS, making HAART an essential approach in the management of KS in most, if not all, patients with AIDS-related KS. However, in case of aggressive, visceral, and/or life-threatening KS, more complex therapeutic schedules have to be taken into account, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or immunotherapy. In general, systemic treatment for KS is limited to widespread, symptomatic disease, whereas local interventions are indicated for minimal, cosmetically troublesome lesions. Among new cytotoxic agents, liposomal anthracyclines and paclitaxel are highly effective molecules for KS and have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as first-line and second-line monotherapy, respectively, for advanced KS. Furthermore, a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of KS has lead to the development of an array of new experimental agents. Many antiangiogenic agents such as AGM 1470 (TNP 470), thalidomide, and glufanide disodium (IM 862) have produced encouraging responses in patients with KS and large clinical trials are in progress. Retinoic acids may also block neoangiogenesis as well as proliferation of KS cells in vitro, and they have been used either systemically or topically with a high response rate. Thus, a topical compound 0.1% alitretinoin gel was approved in 1999 by the FDA for the treatment of skin lesions associated with KS. Human chorionic gonadotropin, a hormonal agent, has shown a strong inhibitory activity in KS cells, but its role in the regression of KS lesions is not clear. Finally, the identification of a novel gamma-herpesvirus, human herpesvirus-8, as a causative agent for KS, together with novel antiangiogenic compounds, such as metalloproteinase inhibitors, may offer promising targets for the therapy of KS.

Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on survival among HIV-infected men with Kaposi sarcoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma

The effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on survival in HIV-infected patients with Kaposi sarcoma (KS) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is unknown. Our study examines survival after HAART for these 2 malignancies. Analyses were performed using data from 387 HIV-infected men in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) after a diagnosis of either KS or NHL in 1990-99. Potential prognostic factors, including HAART, were evaluated in univariate analyses using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. Multivariate survival analyses were conducted using Cox's time-dependent proportional hazards models, adjusting for CD4(+) cell levels at the time of cancer diagnosis and other covariates. Forty-three of 287 KS patients (15%) and 13 of 100 NHL patients (13%) had been treated with HAART. HAART treatment was associated with improved survival for KS and NHL patients (log-rank p = 0.0001 for each group). In multivariate analyses, HAART was associated with an 81% reduced risk of death among KS patients [relative hazard (RH) 0.19, 95% confidence limits (CL) (0.08, 0.45)], compared to those not exposed to HAART and an 84% reduced risk [RH 0.16, 95% CL (0.04, 0.64)] among NHL patients. Relative hazards estimates were similar for those with HAART initiation before and after NHL diagnosis. The use of HAART prolongs overall survival among HIV-positive men diagnosed with KS and NHL. HAART appears to be effective in improving survival even when initiated after the diagnosis of NHL and KS.