New Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Strategy for Node-Positive (stage III) Rectal Cancer: An Analysis

Metastasis-associated protein S100A4--a potential prognostic marker for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Expression of S100A4, a small calcium-binding protein, in breast, oesophagus and gall bladder cancers is shown to be associated with adverse clinical outcome. We retrospectively examined the correlation of S100A4 expression and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Tissue sections from 54 patients with Dukes B, C and D cancers operated on between 1995 and 1998 were stained with anti-S100A4 antibody. The S100A4 expression profile was correlated to the clinico-pathological details.

RESULTS

There were 31 males and 23 females (mean age 65.94 years +/- 12.29). Dukes stage, >4 positive lymph node status and S100A4 expression were significantly associated with poorer survival. The 3 years survival of patients whose tumour stained positive for S100A4 was 62.85% compared to 93.75% for those stained negative (P < 0.012). In patients with <4 involved nodes, S100A4 expression led to poorer survival (57 months vs. 74 months; P < 0.0052). Within a particular Dukes stage, S100A4 expression was associated with poorer outcome. The 5 years survival of Dukes B patients whose tumour stained negative for S100A4 was 92% compared to 54.6% for those with positive tumours.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that S100A4 expression is associated with adverse clinical outcome. Inclusion of S100A4 expression status may enhance our accuracy to prognosticate in patients with colorectal cancer.

Staging and prognosis of colon cancer

Significant advances have been made in all aspects of care relating to colorectal cancer. Although surgery will likely remain the mainstay of definitive treatment for the majority of colorectal malignancies, a better understanding of tumor progression and biology will help guide the choice of surgical therapy to best achieve a curative resection. Additionally, advances in the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies should continue to increase disease-free and overall survival when combined with appropriate operative resection. Although TNM staging remains our strongest tool at this point for establishing prognosis and directing therapy, expansion of our knowledge of the molecular events underlying colorectal tumorigenesis undoubtedly will lead to the refinement of our current staging and prognostic systems.

Staging of colon and rectal cancer: from endoscopy to molecular markers

The primary management of colorectal cancer begins with preoperative diagnosis and the ability to stage the extent of the tumor burden clinically. Endoscopic approaches have been pivotal in this management strategy, and have given rise to endoscopic techniques allowing for primary resection and treatment of metastases. This advance has allowed for the continued development of pathologic staging as used in the tumor node metastasis (TNM) system. The next major milestone in the staging of large bowel cancer will be to blend current anatomic staging strategies with specific molecular markers that will refine subsets appropriate for targeted therapy.

Phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in high-risk stage II and III colon cancer: final report of Intergroup 0089

PURPOSE

In 1990, fluorouracil (FU) plus levamisole for 1 year became standard adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk stages II and III colon cancer. Intergroup (INT) 0089 assessed the relative contributions of leucovorin and levamisole in such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1988 to 1992, 3,794 patients were randomly assigned. Experimental treatment consisted of one of three chemotherapy regimens: the low-dose leucovorin plus FU (Mayo Clinic; LDLV) regimen, the high-dose leucovorin plus FU (Roswell Park; HDLV) regimen, and the low-dose leucovorin plus levamisole plus FU (LDLV plus LEV) regimen, each administered for 30 to 32 weeks. The control arm was levamisole plus FU (LEV) for 1 year.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 10 years, of 3,561 eligible patients, 1,691 (47%) have died and 1,330 (37%) have experienced disease recurrence; 137 (10%) of those experiencing recurrence are still alive. A total of 481 patients (13%) died without evidence of recurrence, and 1,723 (48%) are alive and disease free. Although there were toxicity differences among the four arms, none was statistically superior in disease-free or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The 6- to 8-month regimens of LDLV and HDLV without levamisole used in this trial, rather than the previous standard regimen of 12 months of LEV, have become widely used. INT-0089 has long-term follow-up of the largest clinical trial of patients with high-risk colon cancer, documenting not only the durability of the treatment effects, but also the natural history of patients with high-risk colon cancer, and analyses of treatment based on age, race, and comorbid conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and second primary cancers.

Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists' specimen examination

Correct staging of colon cancer is decisive regarding further oncological treatment, surveillance and prediction of long-term survival. This study investigated the variability in accuracy of pathology reports with focus on differences between pathology departments and their compliance to regional guidelines. Data from the colon cancer register (1997-2002) of the Uppsala/Orebro, Sweden, health care region were analysed and the seven pathology departments in this region were compared. Included were 3735 patients who had undergone resection of a colon cancer. Cumulative 5-year survival was the main end-point. For 64% (n = 2390) of the cases, the number of lymph nodes examined was given (median 8). Survival in stage II was lower when fewer than 12 nodes were examined or when the number of nodes sampled was not given (P = 0.001, log-rank test). In stage III, those with at the most 3 nodes positive (N1) had a better survival than those with 4 or more nodes positive (N2) (P < 0.001, log-rank test). An index of metastases (IM), derived from the number of nodes with metastases divided by the number of nodes examined, was calculated for stage III tumours. Examination of 12 nodes is necessary to assure stage III cases with the median IM (0.32), whereas 20 nodes are necessary to assure 90% of cases with the lower quartile of IM (0.16). Irrespective of the number of nodes investigated, overall survival was better among patients with IM < 0.33 vs. IM > or = 33 (P < 0.001, log-rank test). The prognostic information of the IM was higher than that of the N-stage. Quality of a pathology department, measured by the median number of lymph nodes investigated and by the proportion of reports where the number is given, was determined to indicate correct staging and management of the patient. An index of metastases (IM) is a possible basis for guidance in the choice of adjuvant treatments that appears superior to that of N-stage.

Staging of colorectal cancer: past, present, and future

Since the inception of staging for colorectal cancer (CRC), anatomic extent of disease has provided a solid foundation for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment in patients with CRC. However, the rapid advances in biologic and genetic technology have provided many new possibilities for enhancing the predictive power of the staging system. In this article, we will briefly discuss the history of CRC staging, identify the current parameters for American Joint Committee on Cancer staging including recent changes, and offer guidelines for future staging modifications. Although anatomic parameters have served us well for many years, their continued use as sole contributors to CRC staging is questionable. Staging in the future is likely to be a complicated combination of anatomic and biologic markers used together in mathematic modeling to group patients into prognostic risk groups, which can be used to guide tailored therapy.

Colorectal cancer

Every year, more than 945000 people develop colorectal cancer worldwide, and around 492000 patients die. This form of cancer develops sporadically, in the setting of hereditary cancer syndromes, or on the basis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Screening and prevention programmes are available for all these causes and should be more widely publicised. The adenoma-carcinoma sequence is the basis for development of colorectal cancer, and the underlying molecular changes have largely been identified. Prognosis depends on factors related to the patient, treatment, and tumour, and the expertise of the treatment team is one of the major determinants of outcome. New information on the molecular basis of this cancer have led to the development of targeted therapeutic options, which are being tested in clinical trials. Further clinical progress will largely depend on the broader implementation of multidisciplinary treatment strategies following the principles of evidence-based medicine.