Letrozole compared with tamoxifen for elderly patients with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 trial

Vitamin D threshold to prevent aromatase inhibitor-related bone loss: the B-ABLE prospective cohort study

Aromatase inhibitor (AI)-related bone loss is associated with increased fracture rates. Vitamin D might play a role in minimising this effect. We hypothesised that 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations [25(OH)D] after 3 months supplementation might relate to bone loss after 1 year on AI therapy. We conducted a prospective cohort study from January 2006 to December 2011 of a consecutive sample of women initiating AI for early breast cancer who were ineligible for bisphosphonate therapy and stayed on treatment for 1 year (N = 232). Serum 25(OH)D was measured at baseline and 3 months, and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density at baseline and 1 year. Subjects were supplemented with daily calcium (1 g) and vitamin D(3) (800 IU) and additional oral 16,000 IU every 2 weeks if baseline 25(OH)D was <30 ng/ml. Linear regression models were fitted to adjust for potential confounders. After 1 year on AI therapy, 232 participants experienced a significant 1.68 % [95 % CI 1.15-2.20 %] bone loss at LS (0.017 g/cm(2) [0.012-0.024], P < 0.0001). Higher 25(OH)D at 3 months protected against LS bone loss (-0.5 % per 10 ng/ml [95 % CI -0.7 to -0.3 %], adjusted P = 0.0001), and those who reached levels ≥40 ng/ml had reduced bone loss by 1.70 % [95 % CI 0.4-3.0 %; adjusted P = 0.005] compared to those with low 25(OH)D levels (<30 ng/ml). We conclude that improved vitamin D status using supplementation is associated with attenuation of AI-associated bone loss. For this population, the current Institute of Medicine target recommendation of 20 ng/ml might be too low to ensure good bone health.

Putting the cardiovascular safety of aromatase inhibitors in patients with early breast cancer into perspective: a systematic review of the literature

In the adjuvant setting, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane are recommended at some point during treatment, either in the upfront, switch after tamoxifen or extended treatment setting after tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. AIs have demonstrated superior disease-free survival and overall benefit-to-risk profiles compared with tamoxifen. Potential adverse events, including cardiovascular (CV) side effects, should be considered in the long-term management of patients undergoing treatment with AIs. AIs reduce estrogen levels by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme, thus reducing the levels of circulating estrogen. This further reduction in estrogen levels may potentially increase the risk of developing CV disease. This systematic review evaluated published clinical data for changes in plasma lipoproteins and ischaemic CV events during adjuvant therapy with AIs in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent Drug File and BIOSIS were searched to identify English-language articles published from January 1998 to 15 April 2011 that reported data on AIs and plasma lipoproteins and/or ischaemic CV events. Overall, available data did not show any definitive patterns or suggest an unfavourable effect of AIs on plasma lipoproteins from baseline to follow-up assessment in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. Changes that occurred in plasma lipoproteins were observed soon after initiation of AI therapy and generally remained stable throughout the studies. Available data do not support a substantial risk of ischaemic CV events associated with adjuvant AI therapy; however, studies with longer follow-up are required to better characterize the CV profile of AIs.

Death causes in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Due to improved outcomes in breast cancer (BCa), the proportion of affected women dying of other causes has increased. Thus, a better survival of BCa requires knowledge of other causes of death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on the population, cancers, and causes of death were gathered from the nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database, enrolling ∼3.68 million Swedish women. A Cox regression model, comparing BCa patients against all other women, was applied. Cause-of-death-specific hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for both underlying and multiple causes of death.

RESULTS

Among 641 000 deaths from 1987 to 2006, 48,000 were BCa patients. For underlying causes except BCa, the highest cause-specific HRs were found for diseases of pulmonary circulation {1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-1.68]}, suicide [1.39 (1.19-1.63)], and heart failure [1.29 (1.22-1.37)]. For specific multiple causes, the highest ratios were found for external causes [1.86 (1.80-1.91)] and gastrointestinal disease [1.68 (1.62-1.74)].

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of BCa is associated with increased risks of dying of various causes, including external causes, heart failure, diseases of pulmonary circulation, and gastrointestinal disease. The study fulfills the gap in knowledge of death causes in BCa patients and suggests to draw more attention to comorbidities.

Adjuvant therapy for older women with early-stage breast cancer: treatment selection in a complex population

Breast cancer is a disease of aging. However, older women with breast cancer are less likely to participate in clinical trials or to receive recommended treatment. This undertreatment has contributed to a lag in breast cancer survival outcomes for older women compared with that for their younger counterparts. The principles that govern recommendations for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer are the same for younger and older women. Systemic adjuvant treatment recommendations should be offered on the basis of tumor characteristics that divide patients into three distinct subgroups. These include (1) older women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer who should be offered endocrine therapy; (2) older women with HR-negative and HER2-negative breast cancer who should be offered adjuvant chemotherapy; and (3) older women with HER2-positive disease who should be offered chemotherapy with trastuzumab. Exceptions to these guidelines may be made for older women with small node-negative tumors or frail older women with limited life expectancy, where close surveillance may be a reasonable alternative. Addressing the current age-related disparities in breast cancer survival will require that older women are offered the same state-of-the-art-treatment as their younger counterparts, with a careful weighing of the risks and benefits of each treatment in the context of the individual's preferences. In addition, older women should be encouraged to participate in breast cancer clinical trials to generate additional chemotherapy efficacy, toxicity, and quality of life data.

Approval summary: letrozole (Femara® tablets) for adjuvant and extended adjuvant postmenopausal breast cancer treatment: conversion of accelerated to full approval

On April 30, 2010, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration converted letrozole (Femara®; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ) from accelerated to full approval for adjuvant and extended adjuvant (following 5 years of tamoxifen) treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. The initial accelerated approvals of letrozole for adjuvant and extended adjuvant treatment on December 28, 2005 and October 29, 2004, respectively, were based on an analysis of the disease-free survival (DFS) outcome of patients followed for medians of 26 months and 28 months, respectively. Both trials were double-blind, multicenter studies. Both trials were unblinded early when an interim analysis showed a favorable letrozole effect on DFS. In updated intention-to-treat analyses of both trials, the risk for a DFS event was lower with letrozole than with tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.99; p = .03) in the adjuvant trial and was lower than with placebo (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.76-1.03; p = .12) in the extended adjuvant trial. The latter analysis ignores the interim switch of 60% of placebo-treated patients to letrozole. Bone fractures and osteoporosis were reported more frequently following treatment with letrozole whereas tamoxifen was associated with a higher risk for endometrial proliferation and endometrial cancer. Myocardial infarction was more frequently reported with letrozole than with tamoxifen, but the incidence of thromboembolic events was higher with tamoxifen than with letrozole. Lipid-lowering medications were required for 25% of patients on letrozole and 16% of patients on tamoxifen.

Early operable breast cancer in elderly women treated with an aromatase inhibitor letrozole as sole therapy

BACKGROUND

Primary endocrine therapy (PET) with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is an option in elderly patients unfit for or unwilling to undergo surgery. We studied the outcome of patients treated with letrozole as PET.

METHODS

Patients with early oestrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive breast cancer treated with letrozole from February 2001 to September 2009 were reviewed. Inoperable and locally advanced tumours were excluded. Reasons for offering PET, response, survival, cause of death, time to initial and best response, fracture incidence, and late failure rates were studied.

RESULTS

In all, 104 patients received PET due to frailty (n=48), comorbidity (n=30), old age (n=9), and patient preference (n=17). Median follow-up was 56 months (4-106). Eighty-five cancers responded to letrozole (stable disease (SD, n=19), reduction in size (PR, n=42), and complete response ((CR), n=24)). Median survival was 51 months (4-103), time to initial response (PR/CR) 4.5 months (2-24), and time to best response 8.5 months (3-50). Letrozole was stopped in 25 patients due to progressive disease (n=19), side effects (n=5), and patient choice (n=1). Only 12 of 49 deaths were from breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Letrozole is a reasonable alternative in elderly women with early ER/PR-positive invasive breast cancer who are unfit or unwilling to undergo standard therapy.

Fracture risk and adjuvant hormonal therapy among a population-based cohort of older female breast cancer patients

The risk of hip and other fractures was examined among a population-based group of older women with breast cancer. Women using aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were found to be over three times more likely to have a hip fracture over approximately 3 years' follow-up. Other fracture risk factors were also identified.

INTRODUCTION

Aromatase inhibitors have been shown in randomized trials to increase total fracture risk compared with tamoxifen, but the fracture risks in the trials were relatively low, and no difference in hip fracture has been demonstrated.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of 2003 breast cancer survivors ≥65 were followed prospectively for a median of 36 months. Patient survey information regarding adjuvant breast cancer therapies, prescription osteoporosis treatments, and other factors potentially associated with fracture was supplemented with cancer registry information. Hip and total nonvertebral fractures were determined using a validated Medicare algorithm, and the association of these fractures with adjuvant hormonal therapies was examined using Cox models.

RESULTS

The cohort of 2,748 women with a mean age of 72.8 (SD 5.4) included 28.2% who took an aromatase inhibitor and 27.8% tamoxifen. There were 41 hip fractures (1.5%) and 218 nonvertebral fractures (7.9%) among the cohort. Subjects using AIs (adjusted hazard ratio 3.24 (1.05, 9.98)) and subjects not using hormone therapy (3.32 (1.14, 9.65)) were more likely than users of tamoxifen to have a hip fracture. Bisphosphonate use was more common among AI users but did not explain these results. Users of AIs were more likely to have nonvertebral fractures, but this result did not reach statistical significance (adjusted hazard 1.34 (0.92, 1.94)).

CONCLUSIONS

Hip and other fractures were common in an older population-based cohort of breast cancer survivors, and aromatase inhibitor use was associated with an increase in the short-term risk of hip fractures not detected in randomized controlled trials.

The treatment of early breast cancer in women over the age of 70

One third of all breast cancers are diagnosed in women aged 70 or over. Older women are a heterogeneous population who are under-represented in clinical trials, and as a result uncertainty can exist as to what represents optimal treatment. This minireview, from an international authorship, summarises the existing evidence surrounding the management of early breast cancer in women aged 70 and over. The use of primary surgery and endocrine therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy and trastuzumab are discussed. Reference is made to ongoing clinical trials in this area and areas of controversy are highlighted.

Interpreting Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, early breast cancer

The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study is a four-arm trial comparing 5 years of monotherapy with tamoxifen or with letrozole or with sequences of 2 years of one followed by 3 years of the other for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early invasive breast cancer. From 1998 to 2003, BIG -98 enrolled 8,010 women. The enhanced design f the trial enabled two complementary analyses of efficacy and safety. Collection of tumor specimens further enabled treatment comparisons based on tumor biology. Reports of BIG 1-98 should be interpreted in relation to each individual patient as she weighs the costs and benefits of available treatments.

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT00004205.

Adherence to oral endocrine treatments in women with breast cancer: can it be improved?

There is a perception that women on oral endocrine treatments for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer will be adherent to these medicines, as they are facing a serious life-threatening disease, and the oral endocrine treatments are effective, easy to use and generally well tolerated. This is not in fact the case, and this is the basis of the first half of this review. The second half is of whether the changes/interventions to 'improve' adherence do actually increase adherence to the oral endocrine medicines. The review shows that better outcomes are achieved with good adherence to endocrine treatments in breast cancer. The rates of adherence to endocrine treatments range between 15 and 50%, and are influenced by a large number of factors (e.g. adverse effects, lack of belief in treatment, psychological problems and poor patient-health care provider relationship). Interventions to minimise the adverse effects have been used in an attempt to improve the adherence to the endocrine treatment therapies, but it is not known whether these do actually improve adherence. Similar, it has been assumed that interventions by health professionals (doctors, nurses and pharmacists) will improve the adherence, but this has not been tested. In conclusion, in women with breast cancer, we know there is a problem with adherence. There are also many approaches and suggestions about how to improve adherence to the oral endocrine treatments, but none of these approaches/suggestions have been scientifically tested, and they need to be.

Use of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in a large population-based cohort of women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-compliance with oral treatment in oncology is an emerging health issue. For breast cancer (BC) patients, few data are available on compliance and persistence to tamoxifen in younger women and to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as compared with tamoxifen in older women.

METHODS

We constituted a cohort of 13,479 women with BC who received at least one prescription of tamoxifen or AI between 1998 and 2008, in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Days covered by medication and treatment discontinuation were studied. Time to treatment discontinuation was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, 18.9% (95% CI: 15.1-23.0) of women on AIs as compared with 31.0% (95% CI: 29.6-32.2) of women on tamoxifen had discontinued their treatments within the first 5 years (P<0.001). This rate raised to 50.7% (95% CI: 43.0-57.9) among the 416 women under 40 years receiving tamoxifen as initial hormonal therapy. Among older women, treatment discontinuation was less frequent for AIs as compared with tamoxifen (P<0.001). Among women on AI therapy, 14% of them (n=374) had switched treatments.

CONCLUSION

Among older women, the real-life patterns of use of AI show high rates of compliance. In younger women, tamoxifen is prematurely discontinued for half of patients.

Comparing guidelines for adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a coming of age

Following surgery for early breast cancer, the standard of care for postmenopausal women is adjuvant therapy with any combination of radiation therapy, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Clinicians rely on many tools, including guidelines, to make these treatment decisions. Such guidelines include the St Gallen consensus statement, the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, as well as various regional and national guidelines. Recommendations may vary, because different methods and criteria were used to assess the strength of supporting data. This article provides an overview of global guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and points out the major differences. Ongoing changes are highlighted, particularly those regarding the adjuvant endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. While previous guidelines recommended tamoxifen alone, all major guidelines now recommend using third-generation aromatase inhibitors either in sequence with tamoxifen or as upfront treatment.

Quality-of-life considerations in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer in the elderly

Breast cancer is a common tumour in the elderly population and management of early disease in particular is a major challenge for oncologists and geriatricians alike. An important aspect is a differentiated knowledge about the short-term effects and long-term perspectives regarding levels of functioning and subjective well-being associated with different treatment strategies. The article focuses on available quality-of-life (QOL) measurement instruments in elderly patients with early breast cancer and the impact of various local or systemic treatments on QOL scores. A selective literature search was carried out in the PubMed database from January 2000 to May 2010 using the terms 'early breast cancer', 'elderly' and 'quality of life'. Contributions to international congresses on breast cancer in 2009 were also included. Of the 80 articles retrieved, 46 publications were excluded from further consideration due to failure to fulfil inclusion criteria (e.g. not restricted to the elderly, inclusion of patients with metastatic disease, no adjuvant treatment). Sixteen papers focusing on complementary treatment were also rejected. The remaining 18 articles were extensively reviewed. The selection of described QOL measurements was very heterogeneous in these 18 studies. Commonly used QOL instruments were the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy questionnaires (FACT-G, FACT-B) and its subscales. Additionally, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (MOS-SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) approach were used by various study groups. The general limitations of QOL assessment in the elderly population are discussed in the review. Surgery, when considered from a technical point of view, does not differ significantly with patient age. Furthermore, age in itself should not be a contraindication to breast-conserving surgery (BCS) because QOL appears somewhat better after conservative surgical treatment. Avoiding axillary surgery and undergoing sentinel lymph node dissection in elderly patients are both associated with better short-term QOL. However, conventional axillary surgery has little effect on long-term QOL in older women. The advent of innovative radiotherapy techniques has resulted in marked improvements in short-term tolerability together with reductions in the incidence and severity of late normal tissue damage. A potential alternative to conventional postoperative radiotherapy after BCS in the future is the intraoperative radiotherapy technique. Chemotherapy has considerable effects on QOL in breast cancer patients. Most studies found that overall QOL was maintained or improved in patients receiving either aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen but patients reported different adverse effects. For the majority of older breast cancer survivors, cancer-specific well-being and general emotional health do not change substantially after a breast cancer diagnosis. In summary, issues related to baseline co-morbidities in frail elderly, the adverse effects of novel chemotherapeutic agents (e.g. nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel) or target drugs (biologicals) and compliance in the elderly population should receive more attention in evaluations of QOL in elderly breast cancer patients. Future studies that include QOL measurements should also provide details on the data collection and quality control methodologies used.

Evaluation of treatment-effect heterogeneity using biomarkers measured on a continuous scale: subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot

The discovery of biomarkers that predict treatment effectiveness has great potential for improving medical care, particularly in oncology. These biomarkers are increasingly reported on a continuous scale, allowing investigators to explore how treatment efficacy varies as the biomarker values continuously increase, as opposed to using arbitrary categories of expression levels resulting in a loss of information. In the age of biomarkers as continuous predictors (eg, expression level percentage rather than positive v negative), alternatives to such dichotomized analyses are needed. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of an intuitive statistical approach-the subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP)-for evaluating treatment-effect heterogeneity when a biomarker is measured on a continuous scale. STEPP graphically explores the patterns of treatment effect across overlapping intervals of the biomarker values. As an example, STEPP methodology is used to explore patterns of treatment effect for varying levels of the biomarker Ki-67 in the BIG (Breast International Group) 1-98 randomized clinical trial comparing letrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. STEPP analyses showed patients with higher Ki-67 values who were assigned to receive tamoxifen had the poorest prognosis and may benefit most from letrozole.

Challenges in clinical patient management

The use of endocrine therapy in breast cancer represents one of the earliest molecular targeting strategies used in cancer treatment. Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen-receptor (ER) modulator, has been the standard of care for women with receptor-positive breast cancer for the last 30 years. Tamoxifen suppresses the estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer cells by specifically targeting the ER. Because of estrogenic effects, tamoxifen does not increase the risk of osteoporosis, but it can lead to endometrial cancer and thromboembolism. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) exert their tumor antiproliferative action by targeting an enzyme critical for estrogen biosynthesis. The AIs thus have a different mechanism of action than tamoxifen, and a different safety profile. The majority of adverse events (AEs) related to the AIs are mild to moderate. Most of these AEs are common to menopause and are predictable and manageable. This review looks at AI-associated side effects and current clinical management strategies, with a particular emphasis on managing bone health. Compliance with long-term therapy, strategies to improve adherence, and considerations in elderly patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer are also discussed.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

To develop evidence-based guidelines, based on a systematic review, for endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

A literature search identified relevant randomized trials. Databases searched included MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and those for the Annual Meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS). The primary outcomes of interest were disease-free survival, overall survival, and time to contralateral breast cancer. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and quality of life. An expert panel reviewed the literature, especially 12 major trials, and developed updated recommendations.

RESULTS

An adjuvant treatment strategy incorporating an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as primary (initial endocrine therapy), sequential (using both tamoxifen and an AI in either order), or extended (AI after 5 years of tamoxifen) therapy reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence compared with 5 years of tamoxifen alone. Data suggest that including an AI as primary monotherapy or as sequential treatment after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen yields similar outcomes. Tamoxifen and AIs differ in their adverse effect profiles, and these differences may inform treatment preferences.

CONCLUSION

The Update Committee recommends that postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer consider incorporating AI therapy at some point during adjuvant treatment, either as up-front therapy or as sequential treatment after tamoxifen. The optimal timing and duration of endocrine treatment remain unresolved. The Update Committee supports careful consideration of adverse effect profiles and patient preferences in deciding whether and when to incorporate AI therapy.

Effects of a structured weight-bearing exercise program on bone metabolism among breast cancer survivors: a feasibility trial

PURPOSE

Treatments for breast cancer, specifically hormonal therapy, accelerate bone loss (BL) among breast cancer survivors, leading to osteoporosis and an increase in fracture risk. Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) is a moderate form of weight-bearing exercise, equivalent to walking, and it has been shown to improve aerobic capacity and strength among breast cancer survivors and might also be effective in slowing bone loss in breast cancer survivors. This pilot study compared the influence of TCC with that of standard support therapy (ST; exercise control) on BL biomarkers among breast cancer survivors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Randomly assigned breast cancer survivors (N = 16; median age, 53 years; < 30 months after treatment) completed 12 weeks (3 times per week, 60 minutes per session) of TCC or ST. Serum levels of N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx), a marker of bone resorption, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), a marker of bone formation, were determined according to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Using analysis of covariance, survivors in the TCC group experienced a greater increase in levels of bone formation (BSAP [microg/L]: before, 8.3; after, 10.2; change, 1.9 microg/L and 22.4%), compared with survivors in ST (BSAP [microg/L]: before, 7.6; after, 8.1; change, 0.5 microg/L [6.3%]). Survivors in the TCC group also experienced a significant decrease in bone resorption (NTx [nanomoles bone collagen equivalent; nmBCE]: before, 17.6; after, 11.1; change, -6.5 nmBCE; -36.9%), whereas women in the ST group did not (NTx [nmBCE]: before, 20.8; after, 18.8; change, -2.0 nmBCE; -9.6%).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests that weight-bearing exercise exerts positive effects on BL, through increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption. Further examinations of the influence of TCC on bone health are warranted.

Oncologists' recommendations for adjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients of varying age and health status

BACKGROUND

Currently, evidence supports the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The goal of the current study is to understand the effect of patient age and health status on oncologists' decision to recommend adjuvant treatment (endocrine therapy and chemotherapy) in older women with HR-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An online survey was conducted, with questions related to a hypothetical patient of varying age and health status with a T2 N2 HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Treatment options included chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, endocrine therapy alone, or no therapy. Respondents (n = 151) were further asked to specify use of either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to determine the effect of age and health status on recommendations.

RESULTS

As the hypothetical patient's age increased or health status deteriorated, oncologists (n = 151) were less likely to recommend a combination of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy (P < .0001 for both). In contrast, oncologists were more likely to recommend endocrine therapy alone with advanced age and deteriorating health status (P < .0001 for both). Oncologists were more likely to choose treatment with aromatase inhibitors as opposed to tamoxifen (P < .01), irrespective of age or health status.

CONCLUSION

With increasing age and declining health status, oncologists were more likely to recommend endocrine therapy alone as opposed to chemotherapy with endocrine therapy. Oncologists were most likely to recommend aromatase inhibitors, irrespective of age or health status.

Experimental treatment of oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer with tamoxifen and brivanib alaninate, a VEGFR-2/FGFR-1 kinase inhibitor: a potential clinical application of angiogenesis inhibitors

PURPOSE

Tamoxifen, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM), and brivanib alaninate, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) inhibitor, are two target specific agents that result in a substantial decrease in tumour growth when given alone. Tamoxifen activates SERM stimulated breast and endometrial tumour growth. Tamoxifen and brivanib alaninate have side-effects that can affect therapeutic outcomes. The primary goal of the current study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of lower doses of both agents when given in combination to mice with SERM sensitive, oestrogen stimulated tumour xenografts (MCF-7 E2 tumours). Experiments were conducted to evaluate the response of SERM stimulated breast (MCF-7 Tam, MCF-7 Ral) and endometrial tumours (EnCa 101) to demonstrate the activity of brivanib alaninate in SERM resistant models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In the current study, tumour xenografts were minced and bi-transplanted into the mammary fat pads of athymic, ovariectomised mice. Preliminary experiments were conducted to determine an effective oral dose of tamoxifen and brivanib alaninate that had minimal effect on tumour growth. Doses of 125 microg of tamoxifen and 0.05 mg/g of brivanib alaninate were evaluated. An experiment was designed to evaluate the effect of the two agents together when started at the time of tumour implantation. An additional experiment was done in which tumours were already established and then treated, to obtain enough tumour tissue for molecular analysis.

RESULTS

Brivanib alaninate was effective at inhibiting tumour growth in SERM sensitive (MCF-7 E2) and SERM stimulated (EnCa 101, MCF-7 Ral, MCF-7 Tam) models. The effect of the low dose drug combination as an anti-tumour strategy for SERM sensitive (MCF-7 E2) in early treatment was as effective as higher doses of either drug used alone. In established tumours, the combination is successful at decreasing tumour growth, while neither agent alone is effective. Molecular analysis revealed a decreased phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 in tumours that were treated with brivanib alaninate and an increase in VEGFA transcription to compensate for the blockade of VEGFR-2 by increasing the transcription of VEGFA. Tamoxifen increases the phosphorylation of VEGFR-2 and this effect is abrogated by brivanib alaninate. There was also increased necrosis in tumours treated with brivanib alaninate.

CONCLUSION

Historically, tamoxifen has a role in blocking angiogenesis as well as the blockade of the ER. Tamoxifen and a low dose of an angiogenesis inhibitor, brivanib alaninate, can potentially be combined not only to maximise therapeutic efficacy but also to retard SERM resistant tumour growth.

Epigenetic regulation in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer--role in treatment response

Recent advances in breast cancer treatment have allowed increasing numbers of patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+) breast cancer to receive various forms of endocrine therapy. Unfortunately, de novo and acquired resistance to endocrine therapy remains a major challenge in the clinic. A number of possible mechanisms for drug resistance have been described, which include activation of growth factor receptor pathways, overexpression of ER coactivators, and metabolic resistance due to polymorphisms in metabolizing enzymes. While many of these changes are caused by genetic alterations, there is also increasing evidence to implicate epigenetic gene regulatory mechanisms in the development of endocrine resistance. Since epigenetic modifications are easier to reverse than genetic mutations, they are appealing therapeutic targets, and thus future improvements in medical care for breast cancer patients will depend upon a better understanding of the roles epigenetic modifications play in endocrine resistance. In this review we will focus on recent advances made in the understanding of epigenetic gene regulation in estrogen response and endocrine resistance in breast cancer. We will also summarize current clinical-translational advances in epigenetic therapy, and discuss potential future clinical use of epigenetic changes as therapeutic targets, especially with respect to endocrine treatment.

Randomized clinical trials in breast cancer

Breast cancer remains the most common cancer diagnosed in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in this group. Significant advances in the treatment of breast cancer and in the ability to screen for the disease mean that it is also one of the most curable forms of cancer. Long-term updates of the trials reviewed in the previous edition of this article have demonstrated that breast-conserving therapy remains a viable option for most patients, and that local control is related to overall survival. New chemotherapeutic options and endocrine therapies are available to select subsets of patients, and the use of endocrine therapy in breast cancer prevention has been shown to be of clear benefit. The sheer number of breast cancer-related randomized, controlled trials makes it impossible to review all level Ia evidence in this article but, where possible, extensive referencing and tabular review of related trials are used to provide the reader with a clear outline of the central data dictating current standard of care.

[Local control in breast cancer: constant importance, changing radiotherapy practice]

Local control is of primary importance when treating operable breast cancer. Local relapse serves as a secondary source of distant metastases, and compromises survival. Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery, however, sometimes it leads to overtreatment. The risk of local relapse may be estimated based on different correlated factors, such as the type of the surgery, the size and stage of the tumor, the nodal status, the histological type, multifocality and biological features of the cancer, the margin status, the age and the mammographic appearance of the lesion. Late radiogenic sequelae appearing 5-10 years after radiotherapy are sometimes fatal, but may be prevented if radiotherapy is delivered at a high standard. Systemic therapies contribute to local control, and in some cases may substitute radiotherapy. In other low risk cases, radiotherapy may be either omitted or lessened. Local therapies in breast cancer should be tailored individually.

The expanding use of third-generation aromatase inhibitors: what the general internist needs to know

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer patients represent the largest group of adult cancer survivors in the US. Most breast cancers in women 50 years of age and older are hormone receptor positive. Third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the newest class of drugs used in treating hormone responsive breast cancer. It is often during start of adjuvant hormone therapy that the breast cancer patient establishes (or reestablishes) close follow-up with their general internist.

OBJECTIVE

Given the large numbers of breast cancer patients in the US and the increasing use of third generation AI's, general internists will need to have a clear understanding of these drugs including their benefits and potential harms. Currently there are three third generation aromatase inhibitors FDA approved for use in the US. All have been shown to be superior to tamoxifen in disease free survival (DFS) in the treatment of both metastatic and early breast cancers.

RESULTS

While the data on side effects is limited, AI (compared to tamoxifen) may result in higher rates of osteoporosis and fractures, more arthralgias, and increased vaginal dryness and dysparuenia. Limited information on their effects on the cardiovascular system and neuro-cognitive function are also available. Patient's receiving adjuvant hormone therapy are generally considered disease free or disease stable and require less intensive monitoring by their breast cancer specialist.

CONCLUSIONS

In situations where patients experience significant negative side effects from AI therapy, discussions to discontinue treatment (and switch to an alternative endocrine therapy) should involve the cancer specialist and take into consideration the patient's risk for breast cancer recurrence and the impact of therapy on their quality of life. In some cases, patients may choose to never initiate AI treatment. In other cases, patients may choose to prematurely discontinue therapy even if therapy is well tolerated. In both settings increased knowledge by the general internists will likely facilitate discussions of risks versus benefits of therapy and possibly improve compliance to adjuvant hormone therapy.

Letrozole: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer

Letrozole (Femara) is a third-generation, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Adjuvant therapy with letrozole is more effective than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer, and extended adjuvant therapy with letrozole after the completion of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is more effective than placebo in this patient population; letrozole is generally well tolerated. Ongoing trials will help answer outstanding questions regarding the optimal duration of letrozole therapy in early breast cancer and its efficacy compared with other third-generation aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole. In the meantime, letrozole should be considered a valuable option in the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive early breast cancer, both as adjuvant and extended adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Adults with Breast Cancer: Making the Standard a Standard

Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT et al.: Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2055–2065 (2009). To date, only two prospective trials evaluating adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in older adults have been published. The second and more recent trial, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 49907, provides substantial evidence supporting the use of standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens (doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil) as opposed to simplified oral regimens (capecitabine). In this trial, both the risk of relapse (hazard ratio: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.38–3.17; p < 0.001) and the risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.11–3.08; p = 0.02) were significantly higher with capecitabine compared with standard chemotherapy. The current review explores both the implications and potential caveats of this innovative trial. CALGB 49907 represents a paradigm for further studies of adjuvant cancer therapy in older adults.

Adjuvant systemic therapy for older adults with early-stage breast cancer

There is a relative paucity of evidence to guide the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer in older adults. Herein, we review data from relevant clinical trials and retrospective analyses that assess systemic therapies in older adults. Chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, HER2-directed agents and bisphosphonates in the adjuvant setting are discussed. Meta-analyses, such as the Oxford overview, suggest a decreasing benefit of chemotherapy with age. However, prospective trials do support a benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy in older adults. In contrast to chemotherapy, the value of endocrine therapy appears to increase with age. In addition, available subset analyses suggest that the benefit from aromatase inhibitors relative to tamoxifen is independent of age. The use of HER2-directed therapy in older adults is challenged by the relatively low enrollment of this subset in prospective clinical trials. Nonetheless, the extent of enrollment may be proportional to the frequency of HER2 overexpression in this population. Finally, there are little data to support the use of adjuvant bisphosphonate therapy in older adults--ongoing prospective trials may address this issue. Each of the aforementioned therapeutic strategies will be augmented by efforts to personalize therapy for older adults. Clinical tools such as the geriatric assessment and biologic assays, such as the 21-gene recurrence score, may ultimately play a role in treatment algorithms for this unique demographic.

Breast cancer in the elderly

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and most breast cancers are not attributable to risk factors other than female gender and increased age. However, despite its increasing prevalence in the geriatric population, prospective clinical trials for older cancer patients do not exist and most data come from retrospective studies or subanalyses from general population studies. As a result physician's, patient's and family members' fear predominates and elderly patients do not receive the appropriate treatment when compared with younger ones. Treatment is offered according to biological age alone and life expectancy, comorbidity and functional status are not considered when deciding treatment strategy. Surgery is often denied to patients older than 70 years of age, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are omitted due to the fear of toxicity and hormonal therapy, even though it represents a great tool as adjuvant therapy, it is associated with significant morbidity when chosen as primary treatment. Palliation of symptoms remains the main goal for metastatic disease but for the rest of the patients improving disease-free survival in the early stages should guide therapy no matter chronological age.

Treating elderly patients with hormone sensitive breast cancer: what do the data show?

Elderly patients with breast cancer frequently present with one or more comorbid conditions in addition to their cancer, and this can complicate clinicians' treatment decisions. Declining estrogen levels increase the risk for conditions such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis in the elderly. Evidence from clinical trials suggests that the elderly are frequently underrepresented; this may be due to an inherent reluctance among physicians to prescribe the latest, most effective therapies and/or recommend elderly patients for participation in clinical trials. Nonetheless, there is evidence that breast cancer in the elderly is generally more indolent than in younger patients, with a low proliferative and invasive capacity and a high degree of hormone responsiveness, making elderly patients ideal candidates for adjuvant endocrine therapies. The aromatase inhibitors, including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, have proven to be well tolerated and superior alternatives to tamoxifen for post-menopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, whether used upfront or sequentially with adjuvant tamoxifen. Although the elderly have also been underrepresented in clinical trials of the aromatase inhibitors, evidence from the major trials has not shown any decrement in efficacy or major safety concerns when these drugs are used in older populations. While recently published data from MA.17 and the Breast International Group 1-98 showed letrozole to be effective irrespective of age, clinicians should carefully consider underlying comorbidities when prescribing adjuvant endocrine treatments to elderly patients with breast cancer.

Mammography Screening and Treatment of Breast Cancer in the Elderly

Breast cancer patients of an advanced age will suffer from ailments related to both senescence and cancer. Some will have been denied access to screening programmes and will present with an advanced disease. Many will need the expertise of the geriatrician and the oncologist who will participate in specific case discussions to look at social and medical issues that will affect the treatment plan (with questions regarding surgery, radiation, drug therapy, rehabilitation, supportive care, and palliative care often intertwined). This paper reviews recommendations by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) task force which recently assessed the available evidence on breast cancer in elderly individuals, and provided evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer in such individuals. Recommendations on the topics of screening, surgery, radiotherapy, (neo)adjuvant hormone treatment, and chemotherapy, and on metastatic disease have been given. Oncologists are now learning to take into account the physiological age of their patient, which is the reflection of a normal and sometimes abnormally accelerated loss of body reserves which is certainly related to chronological age but not precisely dictated by it. Understanding the biology of breast cancer will allow to optimally adapt the treatment of the elderly patient.