Point-of-care whole blood impedance aggregometry versus classical light transmission aggregometry for detecting aspirin and clopidogrel: the results of a pilot study

Short-term effects of aspirin and clopidogrel on mean platelet volume among patients with acute coronary syndromes. A single-center prospective study

Mean platelet volume (MPV) has been correlated with platelet reactivity, thus its changes might be used to monitor the effects of antiplatelet therapy. However, no data have been reported on platelet remodelling after antiplatelet therapy. The aim of the current study was to investigate the short-term effects of oral antiplatelet therapy on MPV. Our population is represented by 62 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), who did not receive GpIIb-IIIa inhibitors. We measured MPV before starting dual antiplatelet therapy, at day 1, day 2, and day 3-5 from starting adjunctive antiplatelet therapy. We additionally analyzed the relationship between platelet aggregation and MPV at admission by Multiplate in patients who were on chronic aspirin therapy. We observed a significant paradoxical increase in MPV, with a reduction in platelet count. We observed at all time intervals a significant inverse relationship between MPV and platelet count (T0: r = -0.44, P < 0.0001; T1: r = -0.36, P = 0.006; T2: r = -0.3, P = 0.026; T3-5: r = -0.29, P = 0.046). No relationship was observed between MPV and the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition by aspirin. This study showed a paradoxical increase in MPV after starting antiplatelet therapy. In addition, we did not observe any relationship between baseline MPV and the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition by aspirin. Thus, larger MPV does not imply higher platelet reactivity and may not be considered to monitor platelet reactivity and the efficacy of antiplatelet therapies.

Monitoring of acetyl salicylic acid-induced platelet inhibition with impedance aggregometry in children with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts

BACKGROUND

Shunt thrombosis after implantation of systemic-to-pulmonary shunts in paediatric patients is common. Acetyl salicylic acid is used for anti-thrombotic treatment; however, the effect is rarely monitored, although it is known that the response varies. The aim was to determine the effects of acetyl salicylic acid medication on platelet aggregation in children with systemic-to-pulmonary shunts.

METHODS

A total of 14 children – median age 12 days; ranging from 3 to 100 days – were included in a prospective observational longitudinal study. All children were treated with oral acetyl salicylic acid (3–5 milligrams per kilogram once daily) after shunt implantation. Acetyl salicylic acid-dependent platelet aggregation in whole blood was analysed with impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) after addition of arachidonic acid. Analyses were carried out before the primary operation, before and 5 and 24 hours after the first acetyl salicylic acid dose, and after 3–6 months of treatment. The therapeutic range for acetyl salicylic acid was defined as a test result less than 60 units.

RESULTS

Acetyl salicylic acid reduced the arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in all but one patient. Of the patients, 93% were in the therapeutic range 5 hours after acetyl salicylic acid intake, 86% were in the range after 24 hours, and 64% after 3–6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Acetyl salicylic acid reduces platelet aggregation after shunt implantation in paediatric patients, but a considerable percentage of the children are outside the therapeutic range. Monitoring of platelet aggregation has the potential to improve anti-platelet treatment after shunt implantation by identifying children with impaired acetyl salicylic acid response.

Sampling conditions influence multiple electrode platelet aggregometry in cardiac surgery patients

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the importance of blood sampling conditions for multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA) in cardiac surgery patients.

DESIGN

Eighty-one patients undergoing first time CABG surgery were included in three prospective, observational studies. MEA was used to analyze platelet aggregability after addition of adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) or thrombin activating peptide 6 (TRAP). In substudy 1, hirudin and citrate tubes were compared. In substudy 2, samples from peripheral vein, central venous catheter, and radial artery were compared and in substudy 3, the effect of surgery was investigated by analyzing pre- and postoperative samples.

RESULTS

Platelet aggregability values were 30% higher in hirudin tubes than in citrate tubes. There was a significant correlation between hirudin and citrate tubes in TRAP-induced aggregability (r = 0.84, p < 0.001) but not in ADP-induced aggregability (r = 0.25, p = 0.13). The blood sampling site did not influence platelet aggregability. Surgery reduced ADP-induced aggregability by 31% (p < 0.001) and TRAP-induced aggregability by 30% (p < 0.001) with large intraindividual variations.

CONCLUSIONS

MEA results in cardiac surgery patients should not be compared between samples collected in test tubes with different anticoagulants. The choice of blood sampling site does not affect the results. The operation in itself reduces markedly mean platelet aggregability.

Sample transport by pneumatic tube system alters results of multiple electrode aggregometry but not rotational thromboelastometry

Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) present a convenient way for blood sample transport in medical facilities. Associated preanalytical interference in various tests is largely unknown. Implementing point-of-care coagulation management at our institution, we investigated multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) after PTS transportation. Whole blood samples from patients undergoing general or trauma surgery were analysed by MEA after collection (baseline, '0 × PTS') and sent on a predefined PTS track (n = 12). MEA was repeated after samples travelled the track 4 ('4 × PTS'), 8 ('8 × PTS') and 12 times ('12 × PTS') and compared with stationary controls analysed at the same time. Samples for ROTEM (n = 6) were analysed after collection and travelling the track 12 times. An acceleration detector recorded g-forces on the PTS track. At '0 × PTS' no significant differences in MEA results were detected. Values were significantly lower for transported samples compared with controls ('4 × PTS' to '12 × PTS', p < 0.001). Furthermore, MEA results of PTS samples were significantly decreased for '4 × PTS' to '12 × PTS' compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Except for the clotting time in EXTEM PTS transport did not significantly alter results for investigated ROTEM parameters, compared with baseline and stationary controls. Acceleration detector readout revealed alternating g-forces between -6.3 and +5.9 during transport. PTS transport caused invalid results in MEA while only one ROTEM parameter was found to be affected in this study. Variable acceleration during transport provides a potential reason for platelet activation. The authors recommend sample transport by hand or the device to be placed patient-side when MEA is performed.

Do blood collection methods influence whole-blood platelet function analysis?

Pre-analytical variables interact with standard coagulation parameters. How these variables affect the platelet function analysis is not completely known. How collection site and puncture method affect multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and platelet function analyzer (PFA-100®) was compared regarding contact activation. First, volunteers scheduled for elective cardiac surgery had blood collected from four lines: venous, arterial, central venous and by venipuncture. MEA and PFA-100® were analysed blinded for site origin. Second, two samples (citrate, Corn Trypsin Inhibitor, CTI) were collected in syringe or vacuum tubes. Thrombin generation (TG) was determined. MEA was triggered by adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 6.4 µM), arachidonic acid (ASPI, 0.5 mM), collagen (Col, 3.2 µg/ml), ristocetin (Risto, 0.2 mg/ml) and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP, 32 µM). PFA-100® was triggered by collagen/epinephrine and collagen/ADP. TG was assessed in platelet-poor plasma with 1 pM tissue factor and 4 µM phospholipids and without trigger. Data were analysed using a two-way mixed-effects model for the intraclass correlation (ICC) and by the Mann-Whitney U-test. MEA and PFA-100® revealed good correlation (ICC) between the sites. CTI inhibited TG significantly more effective than citrate. Contact activation was independent of the collection method. Only the MEA ASPI test revealed significant differences between the two collection methods. Blood sampling from all lines for MEA and PFA-100® assays is justified. Contact activation is always present. Apparently this does not influence platelet function test results. Collection methods do not seem relevant, although, one should always consider using a standardized method.

Thrombelastographic haemostatic status and antiplatelet therapy after coronary artery bypass surgery (TEG-CABG trial): assessing and monitoring the antithrombotic effect of clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone in hypercoagulable patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Hypercoagulability, assessed by the thrombelastography (TEG) assay, has in several observational studies been associated with an increased risk of post-procedural thromboembolic complications. We hypothesize that intensified antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin, as compared to aspirin alone, will improve saphenous vein graft patency in preoperatively TEG-Hypercoagulable coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) patients and reduce their risk for thromboembolic complications and death postoperatively.

Methods/Design

This is a prospective randomized clinical trial, with an open-label design with blinded evaluation of graft patency. TEG-Hypercoagulability is defined as a TEG maximum amplitude above 69 mm. Two hundred and fifty TEG-Hypercoagulable patients will be randomized to either an interventional group receiving clopidogrel 75 mg daily for three months (after initial oral bolus of 300 mg) together with aspirin 75 mg or a control group receiving aspirin 75 mg daily alone. Monitoring of antiplatelet efficacy and on-treatment platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and aspirin will be conducted with Multiplate aggregometry. Graft patency will be assessed with Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) at three months after surgery.

Conclusions

The present trial is the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether TEG-Hypercoagulable CABG patients will benefit from intensified antiplatelet therapy after surgery. Monitoring of platelet inhibition from instituted antithrombotic therapy will elucidate platelet resistance patterns after CABG surgery. The results could be helpful in redefining how clinicians can evaluate patients preoperatively for their postoperative thromboembolic risk and tailor individualized postoperative antiplatelet therapy.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01046942

Doubling the clopidogrel dose in patients with reduced responsiveness to the standard dose is associated with a limited effectiveness as evaluated by impedance aggregometry

BACKGROUND

Different methods are available for quantifying platelet function inhibition. Measuring vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation is currently the most specific method for assessing the clopidogrel effect. The aim of our study was to compare different tests in view of a clinically applicable bedside test. Further, we examined whether doubling the clopidogrel dose to 150mg/d in clopidogrel low-responder would lead to a reduction in platelet reactivity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ADP-, ADP Hs-, and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation were measured by impedance aggregometry in 100 patients with CAD and 18 healthy controls. Moreover, platelet aggregation was assessed by flow cytometrical detection of VASP-phosphorylation and surface P-selectin in a subgroup of 34 patients and in healthy controls. Another 10 patients with CAD, identified as low-responder, were treated with a clopidogrel dose of 150mg/d. Thereafter, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was assessed by impedance aggregometry. Significant correlations were observed between ADP-induced platelet aggregation assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and by impedance aggregometry. Doubling the dose of clopidogrel to 150mg/d was associated with a reduction of ADP-induced platelet aggregation in only 60% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Impedance aggregometry is a valuable bedside test to assess platelet function inhibition. Doubling the clopidogrel dose is not effective to reduce high on-treatment platelet reactivity in almost half of these patients, pointing to the need of a more powerful platelet inhibitor.

Measurement of Shear-Activated Platelet Aggregate Formation in Non-Anticoagulated Blood: Utility in Detection of Clopidogrel–Aspirin-Induced Platelet Dysfunction

We studied the ability of a new instrument, the PlaCor PRT that measures shear-induced platelet aggregation in fingerstick, non-anticoagulated blood without added agonists, to detect platelet dysfunction ex vivo. Platelet reactivity time (PRT) and whole blood aggregation (WBA) were measured in 160 healthy volunteers, before and after aspirin and in 170 participants with established vascular disease or risk factors thereof treated with aspirin ± clopidogrel. Pretreatment PRT and WBA were significantly correlated (collagen r = −.63; arachidonate r = −.65; P < .0001). Following aspirin, the mean PRT increased from 82 to 142 seconds ( P < .0001), and in participants treated with clopidogrel–aspirin, the mean PRT (286 seconds, n = 65) was significantly longer than with aspirin alone (166 seconds, n = 105; P < .001). Only 13% of PRTs of participants treated with clopidogrel and aspirin were within the normal range. We conclude that the PlaCor PRT is a simple, rapid, point-of-care instrument that compares favorably with published descriptions of other platelet function instruments.

Platelet-large cell ratio and the extent of coronary artery disease: results from a large prospective study

Even though platelet volume has been supposed to be indicator of platelet activation, contrasting results have been reported on its relationship with the extent of coronary artery disease (CAD). No data have been so far reported on Platelet-Large Cell Ratio (P-LCR). Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate whether P-LCR is associated with CAD. We measured P-LCR in 1882 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography. Significant CAD was defined as stenosis >50% in at least 1 coronary vessel. We additionally measured Carotid Intima-Media Thickness (IMT) in 359 patients. The relationship between P-LCR and platelet aggregation was evaluated by PFA-100 and Multiplate. Patients with higher P-LCR were older (P = 0.038), with larger prevalence of diabetes (P < 0.0001), dilated cardiomyopathy or valvular heart disease (P = 0.004) and less often family history of CAD (P = 0.045), more often on statins (P = 0.002), and diuretics (P = 0.016). P-LCR was significantly associated with baseline glycaemia (P = 0.001) and RBC count (P < 0.001), but inversely related to platelet count (P < 0.0001). P-LCR was not associated with the prevalence of CAD (adjusted P = 0.3) or its severity. In addition, P-LCR was not related to Carotid IMT or platelet aggregation in patients with or without aspirin therapy. This study showed that P-LCR is not related to platelet aggregation, aspirin resistance, the extent of CAD and carotid IMT. Thus, P-LCR can not be considered as a marker of platelet reactivity or a risk factor for CAD.

Multiple electrode whole blood aggregometry, PFA-100, and in vivo bleeding time for the point-of-care assessment of aspirin-induced platelet dysfunction in the preoperative setting

BACKGROUND

Acquired platelet dysfunction due to aspirin ingestion may increase bleeding tendency during surgery. Thus, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of in vivo bleeding time (BT) and 2 platelet function assays for the preoperative assessment of a residual antiplatelet effect in patients treated with aspirin.

METHODS

Consecutive patients scheduled for surgery were prospectively enrolled in this study. The patients' last aspirin ingestion had occurred within the previous 48 hours before blood sampling in the "full aspirin effect" group, between 48 and 96 hours before in the "variable aspirin effect" group, and >96 hours before in the "recovered aspirin effect" group. The control group had not taken any aspirin. Multiple electrode aggregometry, platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100, and in vivo BT were performed to assess the effects of aspirin. One-way analysis of variance on ranks with a post hoc multiple-comparison procedure (Dunn) was used to detect differences among the groups. Categorical data were compared using the z test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the platelet function assays investigated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the assays were calculated. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-four patients were included in the analysis (133 control and 261 aspirin-treated patients). All 3 methods were able to detect the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in the full aspirin effect group. Furthermore, no difference in the measurement values between the recovered aspirin effect and control group was found, irrespective of the assay performed. Measurement values in the variable aspirin effect group were different from those of the control group in the ASPItest using multiple electrode aggregometry and COL-EPI using PFA-100 but not in BT. ROC analysis showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in excluding the residual aspirin effect in the ASPItest (AUC 0.81, P < 0.001), followed by COL-EPI (AUC 0.78, P < 0.001) and BT (AUC 0.56, P = 0.05). The cutoff value of 53 U in the ASPItest excluded the effect of aspirin with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

The full therapeutic antiplatelet effects of aspirin can be expected within 48 hours of the patient's last aspirin ingestion. Platelet function recovered in our study if aspirin cessation occurred >96 hours (4 days) before; thus, in these patients, preoperative platelet function testing is not useful. To quantify any residual aspirin effect in patients who ceased their intake of aspirin between 48 and 96 hours before surgery, the ASPItest might have the highest diagnostic accuracy.

Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and impaired platelet function benefit from preoperative desmopressin infusion

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis have a markedly reduced platelet function as measured by a prolonged collagen adenosine diphosphate closure time (CADP-CT) determined by the platelet function analyzer PFA-100. We hypothesized that such patients may benefit from desmopressin when they present with prolonged CADP-CT due to the specific action of desmopressin on von Willebrand factor (VWF) and CADP-CT.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial, 43 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (due to severe aortic valve stenosis with CADP-CT>170 seconds) were given desmopressin 0.3 μg/kg or saline intravenously after induction of anesthesia. Measurement of CADP-CT, factor VIII activity, von Willebrand factor antigen, GpIb binding activity, ristocetin cofactor activity, collagen-binding activity, and multimers were performed after induction of anesthesia, one hour after desmopressin infusion, and 24 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

In the majority of patients, baseline values of von Willebrand factor related indices were normal, but increased one hour after infusion of desmopressin by 73% to 90% as compared with placebo. Selective loss of high molecular weight multimers was seen only in a minority of patients. The CADP-CT was greater than 170 seconds in 92% of screened patients, and desmopressin shortened CADP-CT by 48% versus baseline and reduced postoperative blood loss by 42% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged CADP-CT indicates platelet dysfunction in severe aortic valve stenosis, and can guide the use of desmopressin as an effective prohemostatic agent in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis.

Antiplatelet resistance in stroke

Although the exact prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in ischemic stroke is not known, estimates about the two most widely used antiplatelet agents - aspirin and clopidogrel - suggest that the resistance rate is high, irrespective of the definition used and parameters measured. Inadequate antiplatelet responsiveness correlates with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic vascular events in patients with stroke and acute coronary syndrome. It is not currently known whether tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on platelet function test results translates into a more effective strategy to prevent secondary vascular events after stroke. Large-scale clinical trials using a universally accepted definition and standardized measurement techniques for antiplatelet resistance are needed to demonstrate whether a 'platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment' strategy translates into improved stroke care. This article gives an overview of the clinical importance of laboratory antiplatelet resistance, describes the challenges for platelet-function test-guided antiplatelet treatment and discusses practical issues about the management of patients with aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance.

Perioperative assessment of platelet function in patients under antiplatelet therapy

Platelets play a central role in primary hemostasis. Analysis of platelet function is therefore a cornerstone in the global assessment of the coagulation status in the perioperative setting, primarily in patients receiving antiplatelet medication, such as cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors, adenosine diphosphate antagonists and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In these patients, knowledge of residual platelet function is highly warranted in order to maintain an optimal and individual balance perioperatively between platelet function and inhibition - that is, bleeding and thrombosis. Traditional laboratory-based assays, such as light-transmission aggregometry and flow cytometry, are the clinical standards of platelet function testing today. Light-transmission aggregometry is one of the most widely used tests to identify and diagnose defects in platelet function. The majority of the conventional laboratory-based techniques are labor intensive, costly and time consuming, and require a high degree of experience and expertise to perform and interpret. Therefore, new automated technologies have been developed to measure platelet function more rapidly and easily, and several techniques can be used at the bedside, including whole blood aggregometry, high shear-induced platelet function assessment or viscoelastic measurement techniques. All methods assessing platelet function are summarized and their limitations are discussed in this article, emphasizing their perioperative use.

Validation of a procedure to assess ASA-response in patients with decreased, initial TRAP induced aggregation

Whole blood aggregometry on the is a simple, fast and standardized method and it is widely used to assess platelet function under antiplatelet therapy. Reference ranges and a cut-off value as a measure of ASA response were established by measuring arachidonic acid induced aggregation (ASPI-test) in healthy volunteers and cardiac patients after and used to classify patients as ASA responders or non-responders. However, assessing the platelet function is highly affected by pre-analytical and analytical conditions and often reduced aggregation by TRAP induced aggregation (TRAP-test) is seen, rendering the samples difficult for interpretation of the ASPI-test and the responder status to ASA. We hypothesised that in this simplified model any preanalytical factor has the same effect on TRAP-testing as on ASPI-testing and that by calculating the ratio between a defined, normal TRAP-test result and the TRAP-test result measured for the individual patient this ratio could be applied to the measured ASPI-test thereby reaching a more valid discrimination between ASA responders and -non-responders. TRAP- and ASPI-test were performed in blood from ASA-treated volunteers and controls on Multiplate before an after pneumatic tube delivery as a model to stimulate shear stress induced platelet activation and aggregation. The calculated, normalised ASPI test result after tube delivery did not differ significantly from the initial ASPI test result although tube delivery had a significant impact on the measured ASPI test result. If applied to patients samples a definite judgement on the ASA response status of patients with reduced "general platelet activatability" could be given. Normalisation of the ASPI-test result using the TRAP-test result may provide a method to judge on the ASA response status in patients with decreased initial "general platelet activatability".

Clinical importance of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

Aspirin and clopidogrel are important components of medical therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, for those who received coronary artery stents and in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke. Despite their use, a significant number of patients experience recurrent adverse ischaemic events. Interindividual variability of platelet aggregation in response to these antiplatelet agents may be an explanation for some of these recurrent events, and small trials have linked "aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance", as measured by platelet function tests, to adverse events. We systematically reviewed all available evidence on the prevalence of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, their possible risk factors and their association with clinical outcomes. We also identified articles showing possible treatments. After analyzing the data on different laboratory methods, we found that aspirin/clopidogrel resistance seems to be associated with poor clinical outcomes and there is currently no standardized or widely accepted definition of clopidogrel resistance. Therefore, we conclude that specific treatment recommendations are not established for patients who exhibit high platelet reactivity during aspirin/clopidogrel therapy or who have poor platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.

Evaluation of platelet function and pharmacological platelet inhibition in patients with myeloproliferative disorders using multiple electrode aggregometry

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to describe platelet aggregation characteristics by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and to evaluate MEA for its potential to detect platelet dysfunction and response to anti-aggregatory drugs in patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD).

METHODS

We compared the platelet response to arachidonic acid (ASPI test), adenosine diphosphate (ADP test) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP test) in hirudin-anticoagulated blood of 55 patients with polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia and 75 controls.

RESULTS

Comparing MPD patients and controls no statistically significant difference indicative of platelet dysfunction was found in MPD patients. Analysis of covariance revealed platelet- and leukocyte count as a significant influencing factor on MEA function. Furthermore we could demonstrate that ASA and clopidogrel treatment results in a statistically significant lower ASPI (Controls: p<0.0001, MPD: p<0.0001) and ADPtest value (MPD: p=0.00125) compared to untreated patients thereby validating the method for monitoring of anti-aggregatory therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this study MEA was confirmed as a valid method for monitoring of ASA and clopidogrel treatment in patients with MPD and normal control subjects. The platelet and leukocyte count were identified as major influencing factors on MEA aggregation tests both in MPD patients and controls. No functional platelet abnormalities were detected in MPD patients.

[Perioperative management of patients with coronary stents in non-cardiac surgery]

In patients with coronary stents scheduled for surgery the question arises whether and how antiplatelet therapy should be continued. Risks of perioperative bleeding and of acute stent thrombosis have to be considered simultaneously. The bleeding risk depends primarily on the kind of surgery and on patient comorbidity. The risk of stent thrombosis is increased in these patients due to the thrombogenic surface of the stents. The main determinants are hereby the time duration after stent implantation, the kind of the stent [uncoated (bare-metal stent, BMS) or coated (drug-eluting stent, DES)], as well as angiographic and clinical patient factors. Therefore, perioperative antiplatelet therapy has to be individually adapted for each patient. Bridging with heparin is ineffective. Bridging with intravenous antiplatelet drugs during the perioperative interruption of oral antiplatelet therapy might be a potential procedure in high-risk patients. Whether bedside monitoring of antiplatelet therapy improves the perioperative management of these patients and reduces adverse outcome is object of current studies.

Whole blood impedance aggregometry detects heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin use. IgG antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin trigger the clinical manifestations of HIT. Only a subset of these antibodies will activate platelets and these can only be identified with platelet aggregation (functional) assays. Heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) and (14)C-serotonin release (SRA) assays for HIT are time-consuming and complex to perform. We have developed a whole blood impedance (WBI) test using the new Multiplate analyser. All samples referred to our laboratory over a 10 month period were screened for heparin-PF4 antibodies by an ELISA method (Zymutest HIA IgG). The 4T's score was used to assess HIT pretest probability. Twenty antibody positive samples were further tested by all three functional assays: light transmission aggregometry (LTA), SRA and WBI. Thirteen out of twenty samples were positive by LTA (10 patients) and 15 by WBI (11 patients). SRA, considered to be the gold standard, was used as a confirmatory test and 11 were found to be positive (10 patients); four discrepant samples were weakly positive by WBI. The prevalence of a positive functional test was strongly correlated with the 4T's clinical risk score, but a small number of low-risk patients had positive functional assays. In this study, the WBI assay detected all SRA positive patients and was positive for two others suggesting greater sensitivity. The rapid and easy to perform assay may be a useful tool for haematology laboratories to detect platelet-activating HIT antibodies.

A point-of-care assessment of the effects of desmopressin on impaired platelet function using multiple electrode whole-blood aggregometry in patients after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Blood loss after cardiac surgery can be caused by acquired platelet dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. Monitoring of platelet function is clinically important for the identification of patients experiencing such platelet dysfunction. 1-Deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (desmopressin acetate, DDAVP) has been shown to augment platelet function and to reduce blood loss in patients with platelet dysfunction. In this study, we examined the feasibility of whole blood multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) for the detection of cardiopulmonary bypass-induced platelet dysfunction and investigated its ability to monitor DDAVP treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-eight consecutive patients with blood loss exceeding 150 mL/h in the first 2 consecutive hours after cardiac surgery were screened for suspected isolated platelet dysfunction. Twenty-two patients had suspected isolated platelet dysfunction and were enrolled in the study. Platelet dysfunction was assumed if conventional coagulation analyses (platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, and fibrinogen) did not show abnormal values as defined for transfusion of allogenic blood products, and no surgical cause of bleeding was suspected. Eleven patients received 0.3 microg/kg DDAVP, and 11 patients received no therapy in a nonrandomized manner. MEA was performed after stimulation with thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAPtest, 32 microM), adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest, 6.4 microM), and arachidonic acid (ASPItest, 0.5 mM) before and 2 hours after intervention. Conventional laboratory variables were recorded. The Mann-Whitney test was used to detect differences between the groups, and the Wilcoxon test was used to detect differences before and after intervention.

RESULTS

All enrolled patients showed platelet dysfunction that manifested as impaired platelet aggregation in MEA before intervention. After the intervention, platelet function improved in the DDAVP group (49 U [30/72 U], median [25th/75th percentile] postintervention vs 15 U [8/21 U] preintervention for the ASPItest [P < 0.001]; 35 U [24/54 U] vs 14 U [7/28 U] for the ADPtest [P = 0.002]; and 85 U [66/115 U] vs 64 U [26/88 U] for the TRAPtest [P = 0.007]). In contrast, MEA remained unchanged in the control group (22 U [10/50 U] postintervention vs 33 U [14/57 U] preintervention for the ASPItest [P = 0.175]; 17 U [12/20 U] vs 14 U [10/28 U] for the ADPtest [P = 0.147]; and 65 U [41/89 U] vs 57 U [30/91 U] for the TRAPtest [P = 0.123]).

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired platelet function after cardiac surgery can be assessed at the bedside using MEA. The effect of DDAVP on impaired platelet function can also be detected as significant improvement in platelet aggregation to all activators. This device might be helpful for the identification of patients who may benefit from DDAVP therapy.

Laboratory assessment and perioperative management of patients on antiplatelet therapy: from the bench to the bedside

The contribution of platelets in the pathophysiology of thromboses has established antiplatelet therapy as a cornerstone for prevention or treatment of these disorders. However, patients on antiplatelet drugs undergoing surgery face the life-threatening dilemma between the risk of perioperative thrombosis by ceasing therapy and restoring platelet function versus the risk of surgical bleeding by its continuation. According to their mechanism of action, antiplatelet drugs can be conventionally classified as agents that inhibit cyclooxygenase, block the platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor, inhibit phosphodiesterase, or block platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa. Although several tests have been developed to assess platelet inhibition by most of these compounds, studies to date have not been able to reliably evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of these tests to predict hemorrhage and/or blood loss, and accordingly perioperative assessment of drug-induced platelet inhibition cannot be recommended as yet. Although several management options are available to counteract the hemorrhagic risk of surgical patients using antiplatelet agents, perioperative discontinuation of these drugs is the preferable choice wherever possible. The use of platelet transfusions should be limited where necessary to the treatment of major, life-threatening bleeding. The contribution of newer hemostatic agents, such as desmopressin and recombinant activated factor VII, is yet to be fully determined, and there remain many challenges and unresolved issues in the clinical care of these patients.

Antiplatelet agents

The introduction of aspirin as an anti-thrombotic agent some 50 years ago has changed the therapeutic approach in cardiovascular medicine. Since platelets play a key role in the development of arterial thrombosis, antiplatelet drugs serve as a cornerstone in the prevention and the treatment of these conditions. After many years of a "monopoly" of aspirin, ADP receptor P2Y12 inhibitors were introduced with a significant improvement in clinical outcome. Nowadays dual antiplatelet therapy is the common practice for both acute events and secondary prevention in selected groups of patients. Another revolution was the development of potent inhibitors of the platelet integrin GPIIbIIIa, which significantly improved the outcome of percutaneous interventions (PCI), in cardiology. The improved efficacy of multiple-drug therapy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding, which raises the issue of the dosing of these drugs. Recently, numerous studies have reported a variable laboratory response to aspirin and clopidogrel, which correlates with clinical outcome. Several mechanisms have been proposed to cause this variable response, including genetic variability, disease burden and others. A major obstacle in this field is the lack of a standardized method for testing these responses, and thus some studies cannot be compared to others. Ongoing studies are currently investigating the potential translation of these observations into clinical practice. Such studies may lead to a change in the paradigm of antiplatelet therapy, where individual dose adjustment may improve efficacy and safety. Finally, a variety of new drugs are currently in different stages of development, including new P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, thromboxane receptor blockers, direct thrombin inhibitors and other signaling pathway inhibitors including oral GPIIbIIIa inhibitors. Thus, antiplatelet therapy is currently under intensive development toward multiple-drug therapy and personal-dose adjustment, which may improve clinical outcome.