51
|
Jasper M, Schmidt TL, Ahmad NW, Sinkins SP, Hoffmann AA. A genomic approach to inferring kinship reveals limited intergenerational dispersal in the yellow fever mosquito. Mol Ecol Resour 2019; 19:1254-1264. [PMID: 31125998 PMCID: PMC6790672 DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Understanding past dispersal and breeding events can provide insight into ecology and evolution and can help inform strategies for conservation and the control of pest species. However, parent-offspring dispersal can be difficult to investigate in rare species and in small pest species such as mosquitoes. Here, we develop a methodology for estimating parent-offspring dispersal from the spatial distribution of close kin, using pairwise kinship estimates derived from genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPs were scored in 162 Aedes aegypti (yellow fever mosquito) collected from eight close-set, high-rise apartment buildings in an area of Malaysia with high dengue incidence. We used the SNPs to reconstruct kinship groups across three orders of kinship. We transformed the geographical distances between all kin pairs within each kinship category into axial standard deviations of these distances, then decomposed these into components representing past dispersal events. From these components, we isolated the axial standard deviation of parent-offspring dispersal and estimated neighbourhood area (129 m), median parent-offspring dispersal distance (75 m) and oviposition dispersal radius within a gonotrophic cycle (36 m). We also analysed genetic structure using distance-based redundancy analysis and linear regression, finding isolation by distance both within and between buildings and estimating neighbourhood size at 268 individuals. These findings indicate the scale required to suppress local outbreaks of arboviral disease and to target releases of modified mosquitoes for mosquito and disease control. Our methodology is readily implementable for studies of other species, including pests and species of conservation significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moshe Jasper
- School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas L Schmidt
- School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nazni W Ahmad
- Institute for Medical Research, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Ary A Hoffmann
- School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Baetscher DS, Anderson EC, Gilbert‐Horvath EA, Malone DP, Saarman ET, Carr MH, Garza JC. Dispersal of a nearshore marine fish connects marine reserves and adjacent fished areas along an open coast. Mol Ecol 2019; 28:1611-1623. [DOI: 10.1111/mec.15044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diana S. Baetscher
- Department of Ocean Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterSanta Cruz California
| | - Eric C. Anderson
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterSanta Cruz California
- Institute of Marine Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California
| | - Elizabeth A. Gilbert‐Horvath
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterSanta Cruz California
- Institute of Marine Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California
| | - Daniel P. Malone
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz California
| | - Emily T. Saarman
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz California
| | - Mark H. Carr
- Institute of Marine Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Santa Cruz California
| | - John Carlos Garza
- Department of Ocean Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California
- Southwest Fisheries Science CenterSanta Cruz California
- Institute of Marine Sciences University of California Santa Cruz California
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Statistical test for detecting overdispersion in offspring number based on kinship information. POPUL ECOL 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10144-018-0629-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
54
|
Carroll EL, Bruford MW, DeWoody JA, Leroy G, Strand A, Waits L, Wang J. Genetic and genomic monitoring with minimally invasive sampling methods. Evol Appl 2018; 11:1094-1119. [PMID: 30026800 PMCID: PMC6050181 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The decreasing cost and increasing scope and power of emerging genomic technologies are reshaping the field of molecular ecology. However, many modern genomic approaches (e.g., RAD-seq) require large amounts of high-quality template DNA. This poses a problem for an active branch of conservation biology: genetic monitoring using minimally invasive sampling (MIS) methods. Without handling or even observing an animal, MIS methods (e.g., collection of hair, skin, faeces) can provide genetic information on individuals or populations. Such samples typically yield low-quality and/or quantities of DNA, restricting the type of molecular methods that can be used. Despite this limitation, genetic monitoring using MIS is an effective tool for estimating population demographic parameters and monitoring genetic diversity in natural populations. Genetic monitoring is likely to become more important in the future as many natural populations are undergoing anthropogenically driven declines, which are unlikely to abate without intensive adaptive management efforts that often include MIS approaches. Here, we profile the expanding suite of genomic methods and platforms compatible with producing genotypes from MIS, considering factors such as development costs and error rates. We evaluate how powerful new approaches will enhance our ability to investigate questions typically answered using genetic monitoring, such as estimating abundance, genetic structure and relatedness. As the field is in a period of unusually rapid transition, we also highlight the importance of legacy data sets and recommend how to address the challenges of moving between traditional and next-generation genetic monitoring platforms. Finally, we consider how genetic monitoring could move beyond genotypes in the future. For example, assessing microbiomes or epigenetic markers could provide a greater understanding of the relationship between individuals and their environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L. Carroll
- Scottish Oceans Institute and Sea Mammal Research UnitUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
| | - Mike W. Bruford
- Cardiff School of Biosciences and Sustainable Places Research InstituteCardiff UniversityCardiff, WalesUK
| | - J. Andrew DeWoody
- Department of Forestry and Natural Resources and Department of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteINUSA
| | - Gregoire Leroy
- Animal Production and Health DivisionFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsRomeItaly
| | - Alan Strand
- Grice Marine LaboratoryDepartment of BiologyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonSCUSA
| | - Lisette Waits
- Department of Fish and Wildlife SciencesUniversity of IdahoMoscowIDUSA
| | - Jinliang Wang
- Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Hettiarachchige CKH, Huggins RM. Inference from single occasion capture experiments using genetic markers. Biom J 2018. [PMID: 29532943 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201700046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Accurate estimation of the size of animal populations is an important task in ecological science. Recent advances in the field of molecular genetics researches allow the use of genetic data to estimate the size of a population from a single capture occasion rather than repeated occasions as in the usual capture-recapture experiments. Estimating the population size using genetic data also has sometimes led to estimates that differ markedly from each other and also from classical capture-recapture estimates. Here, we develop a closed form estimator that uses genetic information to estimate the size of a population consisting of mothers and daughters, focusing on estimating the number of mothers, using data from a single sample. We demonstrate the estimator is consistent and propose a parametric bootstrap to estimate the standard errors. The estimator is evaluated in a simulation study and applied to real data. We also consider maximum likelihood in this setting and discover problems that preclude its general use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chathurika K H Hettiarachchige
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,IBM Research, Southbank, VIC, 3006, Australia
| | - Richard M Huggins
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Arandjelovic M, Vigilant L. Non-invasive genetic censusing and monitoring of primate populations. Am J Primatol 2018; 80:e22743. [PMID: 29457631 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 12/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Knowing the density or abundance of primate populations is essential for their conservation management and contextualizing socio-demographic and behavioral observations. When direct counts of animals are not possible, genetic analysis of non-invasive samples collected from wildlife populations allows estimates of population size with higher accuracy and precision than is possible using indirect signs. Furthermore, in contrast to traditional indirect survey methods, prolonged or periodic genetic sampling across months or years enables inference of group membership, movement, dynamics, and some kin relationships. Data may also be used to estimate sex ratios, sex differences in dispersal distances, and detect gene flow among locations. Recent advances in capture-recapture models have further improved the precision of population estimates derived from non-invasive samples. Simulations using these methods have shown that the confidence interval of point estimates includes the true population size when assumptions of the models are met, and therefore this range of population size minima and maxima should be emphasized in population monitoring studies. Innovations such as the use of sniffer dogs or anti-poaching patrols for sample collection are important to ensure adequate sampling, and the expected development of efficient and cost-effective genotyping by sequencing methods for DNAs derived from non-invasive samples will automate and speed analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimi Arandjelovic
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Linda Vigilant
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Hillary RM, Bravington MV, Patterson TA, Grewe P, Bradford R, Feutry P, Gunasekera R, Peddemors V, Werry J, Francis MP, Duffy CAJ, Bruce BD. Genetic relatedness reveals total population size of white sharks in eastern Australia and New Zealand. Sci Rep 2018; 8:2661. [PMID: 29422513 PMCID: PMC5805677 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20593-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Conservation concerns exist for many sharks but robust estimates of abundance are often lacking. Improving population status is a performance measure for species under conservation or recovery plans, yet the lack of data permitting estimation of population size means the efficacy of management actions can be difficult to assess, and achieving the goal of removing species from conservation listing challenging. For potentially dangerous species, like the white shark, balancing conservation and public safety demands is politically and socially complex, often leading to vigorous debate about their population status. This increases the need for robust information to inform policy decisions. We developed a novel method for estimating the total abundance of white sharks in eastern Australia and New Zealand using the genetic-relatedness of juveniles and applying a close-kin mark-recapture framework and demographic model. Estimated numbers of adults are small (ca. 280-650), as is total population size (ca. 2,500-6,750). However, estimates of survival probability are high for adults (over 90%), and fairly high for juveniles (around 73%). This represents the first direct estimate of total white shark abundance and survival calculated from data across both the spatial and temporal life-history of the animal and provides a pathway to estimate population trend.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Hillary
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia.
| | | | - T A Patterson
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| | - P Grewe
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| | - R Bradford
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| | - P Feutry
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| | - R Gunasekera
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| | - V Peddemors
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Sydney Institute of Marine Science 19 Chowder Bay Road, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia
| | - J Werry
- Griffith Centre for Coastal Management, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4226, Australia
| | - M P Francis
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 14901, Wellington, 6022, New Zealand
| | - C A J Duffy
- Department of Conservation, Private Bag 68908, Newton, Auckland, 1145, New Zealand
| | - B D Bruce
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere GPO Box 1538, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Microhaplotypes provide increased power from short‐read
DNA
sequences for relationship inference. Mol Ecol Resour 2017; 18:296-305. [DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
59
|
Skaug HJ. The parent-offspring probability when sampling age-structured populations. Theor Popul Biol 2017; 118:20-26. [PMID: 28947265 DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
We consider two individuals sampled from an age-structured population, and derive the probability that these have a parent-offspring relationship. Such probabilities play an important role in the recently proposed close-kin mark-recapture methods. The probability is decomposed into three terms. The first is the probability of the parent being alive, the second term involves the mechanism by which individuals are sampled, and the third term is a contribution from the observed age of the parent. A stable age distribution in the population is assumed, and we provide an expression for how this distribution is perturbed by the information that an individual has given birth at a particular time point in the past or in the future. Calculations are performed from the perspective of the offspring, but we also make comparison to the situation where the perspective is put on the parent. Although the resulting probabilities are the same, the actual calculations differ, due to the asymmetry of a parent-offspring relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans J Skaug
- University of Bergen, Department of Mathematics, P.O. Box 7803, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Feutry P, Berry O, Kyne PM, Pillans RD, Hillary RM, Grewe PM, Marthick JR, Johnson G, Gunasekera RM, Bax NJ, Bravington M. Inferring contemporary and historical genetic connectivity from juveniles. Mol Ecol 2016; 26:444-456. [PMID: 27864912 DOI: 10.1111/mec.13929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Measuring population connectivity is a critical task in conservation biology. While genetic markers can provide reliable long-term historical estimates of population connectivity, scientists are still limited in their ability to determine contemporary patterns of gene flow, the most practical time frame for management. Here, we tackled this issue by developing a new approach that only requires juvenile sampling at a single time period. To demonstrate the usefulness of our method, we used the Speartooth shark (Glyphis glyphis), a critically endangered species of river shark found only in tropical northern Australia and southern Papua New Guinea. Contemporary adult and juvenile shark movements, estimated with the spatial distribution of kin pairs across and within three river systems, was contrasted with historical long-term connectivity patterns, estimated from mitogenomes and genome-wide SNP data. We found strong support for river fidelity in juveniles with the within-cohort relationship analysis. Male breeding movements were highlighted with the cross-cohort relationship analysis, and female reproductive philopatry to the river systems was revealed by the mitogenomic analysis. We show that accounting for juvenile river fidelity and female philopatry is important in population structure analysis and that targeted sampling in nurseries and juvenile aggregations should be included in the genomic toolbox of threatened species management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Feutry
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.,Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0909, Australia
| | - Oliver Berry
- CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, The University of Western Australia, M097, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Peter M Kyne
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Darwin, NT, 0909, Australia
| | - Richard D Pillans
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Richard M Hillary
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia
| | - Peter M Grewe
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia
| | - James R Marthick
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia
| | - Grant Johnson
- Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, Aquatic Resource Research Unit, GPO Box 3000, Darwin , NT, 0801, Australia
| | | | - Nicholas J Bax
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.,Institute for Marine and Antarctic Science, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 129, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
| | - Mark Bravington
- CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Castray Esplanade, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Casey J, Jardim E, Martinsohn JT. The role of genetics in fisheries management under the E.U. common fisheries policy. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY 2016; 89:2755-2767. [PMID: 27761916 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 08/30/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Exploitation of fish and shellfish stocks by the European Union fishing fleet is managed under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), which aims to ensure that fishing and aquaculture are environmentally, economically and socially sustainable and that they provide a source of healthy food for E.U. citizens. A notable feature of the CFP is its legally enshrined requirement for sound scientific advice to underpin its objectives. The CFP was first conceived in 1970 when it formed part of the Common Agricultural Policy. Its formal inception as a stand-alone regulation occurred in 1983 and since that time, the CFP has undergone reforms in 1992, 2002 and 2013, each time bringing additional challenges to the scientific advisory process as the scope of the advice increased in response to changing objectives arising from E.U. regulations and commitments to international agreements. This paper reviews the influence that genetics has had on fish stock assessments and the provision of management advice for European fisheries under successive reforms of the CFP. The developments in genetics since the inception of the CFP have given rise to a diverse and versatile set of genetic techniques that have the potential to provide significant added value to fisheries assessments and the scientific advisory process. While in some cases, notably Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp., genetics appear to be very well integrated into existing management schemes, it seems that for marine fishes, discussions on the use of genetics and genomics for fisheries management are often driven by the remarkable technological progress in this field, rather than imminent needs emerging from policy frameworks. An example is the recent suggestion to use environmental (e)DNA for monitoring purposes. While there is no denying that state-of-the-art genetic and genomic approaches can and will be of value to address a number of issues relevant for the management and conservation of marine renewable natural resources, a focus on technology rather than policy and management needs is prone to widen the gap between science and policy, governance and management, thereby further impeding the effective integration of genetic and genomic information into the fisheries management decision making process. Hence, rather than focusing on what is technically achievable, this review outlines suggestions as to which modern genetic and genomic approaches are likely to help address some of the most pressing fisheries management challenges under the CFP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Casey
- European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Unit D.02-Water and Marine Resources, TP051-Bldg. 5a, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - E Jardim
- European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Unit D.02-Water and Marine Resources, TP051-Bldg. 5a, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| | - J Th Martinsohn
- European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Unit D.02-Water and Marine Resources, TP051-Bldg. 5a, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Ovenden JR, Leigh GM, Blower DC, Jones AT, Moore A, Bustamante C, Buckworth RC, Bennett MB, Dudgeon CL. Can estimates of genetic effective population size contribute to fisheries stock assessments? JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY 2016; 89:2505-2518. [PMID: 27730623 DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/28/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Sustainable exploitation of fisheries populations is challenging to achieve when the size of the population prior to exploitation and the actual numbers removed over time and across fishing zones are not clearly known. Quantitative fisheries' modeling is able to address this problem, but accurate and reliable model outcomes depend on high quality input data. Much of this information is obtained through the operation of the fishery under consideration, but while this seems appropriate, biases may occur. For example, poorly quantified changes in fishing methods that increase catch rates can erroneously suggest that the overall population size is increasing. Hence, the incorporation of estimates of abundance derived from independent data sources is preferable. We review and evaluate a fisheries-independent method of indexing population size; inferring adult abundance from estimates of the genetic effective size of a population (Ne ). Recent studies of elasmobranch species have shown correspondence between Ne and ecologically determined estimates of the population size (N). Simulation studies have flagged the possibility that the range of Ne /N ratios across species may be more restricted than previously thought, and also show that declines in Ne track declines in the abundance of model fisheries species. These key developments bring this new technology closer to implementation in fisheries science, particularly for data-poor fisheries or species of conservation interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Ovenden
- Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - G M Leigh
- Agri-Science Queensland, Department of Agriculture & Fisheries, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - D C Blower
- Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - A T Jones
- Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
- Centre for Applications in Natural Resource Mathematics, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - A Moore
- Fisheries, Forestry & Land, Australian Bureau of Agricultural & Resource Economics and Sciences, Department of Agriculture & Water Resources, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - C Bustamante
- Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
- Shark & Ray Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - R C Buckworth
- Tropical Ecosystems Research Centre, Oceans & Atmosphere, CSIRO, Berrimah, NT, 0820, Australia
| | - M B Bennett
- Shark & Ray Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | - C L Dudgeon
- Molecular Fisheries Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
- Shark & Ray Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
|