51
|
Merkulova TI, Ananko EA, Ignatieva EV, Kolchanov NA. Transcription regulatory codes of eukaryotic genomes. RUSS J GENET+ 2013. [DOI: 10.1134/s1022795413010079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
52
|
Yien YY, Bieker JJ. EKLF/KLF1, a tissue-restricted integrator of transcriptional control, chromatin remodeling, and lineage determination. Mol Cell Biol 2013; 33:4-13. [PMID: 23090966 PMCID: PMC3536305 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01058-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF or KLF1) is a transcriptional regulator that plays a critical role in lineage-restricted control of gene expression. KLF1 expression and activity are tightly controlled in a temporal and differentiation stage-specific manner. The mechanisms by which KLF1 is regulated encompass a range of biological processes, including control of KLF1 RNA transcription, protein stability, localization, and posttranslational modifications. Intact KLF1 regulation is essential to correctly regulate erythroid function by gene transcription and to maintain hematopoietic lineage homeostasis by ensuring a proper balance of erythroid/megakaryocytic differentiation. In turn, KLF1 regulates erythroid biology by a wide variety of mechanisms, including gene activation and repression by regulation of chromatin configuration, transcriptional initiation and elongation, and localization of gene loci to transcription factories in the nucleus. An extensive series of biochemical, molecular, and genetic analyses has uncovered some of the secrets of its success, and recent studies are highlighted here. These reveal a multilayered set of control mechanisms that enable efficient and specific integration of transcriptional and epigenetic controls and that pave the way for proper lineage commitment and differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette Y. Yien
- Department of Developmental and Regenerative Biology
- Graduate School of Biological Sciences
| | - James J. Bieker
- Department of Developmental and Regenerative Biology
- Black Family Stem Cell Institute
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Betts JA, French JD, Brown MA, Edwards SL. Long-range transcriptional regulation of breast cancer genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2012; 52:113-25. [PMID: 23077082 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2012] [Revised: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 09/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a major health problem and understanding the genetic basis of this disease is crucial for predicting risk and developing effective targeted therapeutics. Several breast cancer predisposing genes have been identified, but mutations in the coding regions of these genes only accounts for a small proportion of risk. Research now suggests that combinations of multiple non-coding changes in breast cancer susceptibility genes, which cause moderate alterations in gene expression, will be responsible for the remaining inherited risk. These non-coding changes will include variants in proximal and distal transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory elements and may affect the levels and function of trans-acting factors, including proteins and RNAs, which act on these elements. Somatic changes in such elements and factors have also been associated with breast cancer progression. With the recent advent of techniques allowing the detection of long-range DNA interactions spanning the human genome, it has become increasingly clear that long-range regulatory elements constitute an important mechanism for gene regulation. Recent studies have identified several such elements that are important for regulating genes involved in breast cancer, raising the possibility that defects in these sequences may contribute to breast cancer predisposition and progression. In this review, we discuss the emerging functions of cis-regulatory elements and a subset of trans-acting factors in breast tumorigenesis. We also discuss some recent progress in our understanding of how dysregulation in these transcriptional components may contribute to breast cancer, and the potential implications for molecular diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and the treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Betts
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Katzenberger RJ, Rach EA, Anderson AK, Ohler U, Wassarman DA. The Drosophila Translational Control Element (TCE) is required for high-level transcription of many genes that are specifically expressed in testes. PLoS One 2012; 7:e45009. [PMID: 22984601 PMCID: PMC3439415 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 08/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the importance of core promoter elements for tissue-specific transcription of RNA polymerase II genes, we examined testis-specific transcription in Drosophila melanogaster. Bioinformatic analyses of core promoter sequences from 190 genes that are specifically expressed in testes identified a 10 bp A/T-rich motif that is identical to the translational control element (TCE). The TCE functions in the 5′ untranslated region of Mst(3)CGP mRNAs to repress translation, and it also functions in a heterologous gene to regulate transcription. We found that among genes with focused initiation patterns, the TCE is significantly enriched in core promoters of genes that are specifically expressed in testes but not in core promoters of genes that are specifically expressed in other tissues. The TCE is variably located in core promoters and is conserved in melanogaster subgroup species, but conservation dramatically drops in more distant species. In transgenic flies, short (300–400 bp) genomic regions containing a TCE directed testis-specific transcription of a reporter gene. Mutation of the TCE significantly reduced but did not abolish reporter gene transcription indicating that the TCE is important but not essential for transcription activation. Finally, mutation of testis-specific TFIID (tTFIID) subunits significantly reduced the transcription of a subset of endogenous TCE-containing but not TCE-lacking genes, suggesting that tTFIID activity is limited to TCE-containing genes but that tTFIID is not an obligatory regulator of TCE-containing genes. Thus, the TCE is a core promoter element in a subset of genes that are specifically expressed in testes. Furthermore, the TCE regulates transcription in the context of short genomic regions, from variable locations in the core promoter, and both dependently and independently of tTFIID. These findings set the stage for determining the mechanism by which the TCE regulates testis-specific transcription and understanding the dual role of the TCE in translational and transcriptional regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebeccah J. Katzenberger
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth A. Rach
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ashley K. Anderson
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Uwe Ohler
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DAW); (UO)
| | - David A. Wassarman
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- * E-mail: (DAW); (UO)
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Wilhelm E, Doyle MC, Nzaramba I, Magdzinski A, Dumais N, Bell B. CTGC motifs within the HIV core promoter specify Tat-responsive pre-initiation complexes. Retrovirology 2012; 9:62. [PMID: 22834489 PMCID: PMC3419132 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-9-62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 07/26/2012] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background HIV latency is an obstacle for the eradication of HIV from infected individuals. Stable post-integration latency is controlled principally at the level of transcription. The HIV trans-activating protein, Tat, plays a key function in enhancing HIV transcriptional elongation. The HIV core promoter is specifically required for Tat-mediated trans-activation of HIV transcription. In addition, the HIV core promoter has been shown to be a potential anti-HIV drug target. Despite the pivotal role of the HIV core promoter in the control of HIV gene expression, the molecular mechanisms that couple Tat function specifically to the HIV core promoter remain unknown. Results Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), the TATA box and adjacent sequences of HIV essential for Tat trans-activation were shown to form specific complexes with nuclear extracts from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, as well as from HeLa cells. These complexes, termed pre-initiation complexes of HIV (PICH), were distinct in composition and DNA binding specificity from those of prototypical eukaryotic TATA box regions such as Adenovirus major late promoter (AdMLP) or the hsp70 promoter. PICH contained basal transcription factors including TATA-binding protein and TFIIA. A mutational analysis revealed that CTGC motifs flanking the HIV TATA box are required for Tat trans-activation in living cells and correct PICH formation in vitro. The binding of known core promoter binding proteins AP-4 and USF-1 was found to be dispensable for Tat function. TAR RNA prevented stable binding of PICH-2, a complex that contains the general transcription factor TFIIA, to the HIV core promoter. The impact of TAR on PICH-2 specifically required its bulge sequence that is also known to interact with Tat. Conclusion Our data reveal that CTGC DNA motifs flanking the HIV TATA box are required for correct formation of specific pre-initiation complexes in vitro and that these motifs are also required for Tat trans-activation in living cells. The impact of TAR RNA on PICH-2 stability provides a mechanistic link by which pre-initiation complex dynamics could be coupled to the formation of the nascent transcript by the elongating transcription complex. Together, these findings shed new light on the mechanisms by which the HIV core promoter specifically responds to Tat to activate HIV gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Wilhelm
- RNA Group, Département de Microbiologie et d'Infectiologie, Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Pavillon de Recherche Appliquée sur le Cancer, 3201 rue Jean-Migneault, Sherbrooke, Québec J1E 4K8, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
56
|
Metazoan promoters: emerging characteristics and insights into transcriptional regulation. Nat Rev Genet 2012; 13:233-45. [PMID: 22392219 DOI: 10.1038/nrg3163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 340] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Promoters are crucial for gene regulation. They vary greatly in terms of associated regulatory elements, sequence motifs, the choice of transcription start sites and other features. Several technologies that harness next-generation sequencing have enabled recent advances in identifying promoters and their features, helping researchers who are investigating functional categories of promoters and their modes of regulation. Additional features of promoters that are being characterized include types of histone modifications, nucleosome positioning, RNA polymerase pausing and novel small RNAs. In this Review, we discuss recent findings relating to metazoan promoters and how these findings are leading to a revised picture of what a gene promoter is and how it works.
Collapse
|
57
|
Defective transcription initiation causes postnatal growth failure in a mouse model of nucleotide excision repair (NER) progeria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109:2995-3000. [PMID: 22323595 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114941109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) defects are associated with cancer, developmental disorders and neurodegeneration. However, with the exception of cancer, the links between defects in NER and developmental abnormalities are not well understood. Here, we show that the ERCC1-XPF NER endonuclease assembles on active promoters in vivo and facilitates chromatin modifications for transcription during mammalian development. We find that Ercc1(-/-) mice demonstrate striking physiological, metabolic and gene expression parallels with Taf10(-/-) animals carrying a liver-specific transcription factor II D (TFIID) defect in transcription initiation. Promoter occupancy studies combined with expression profiling in the liver and in vitro differentiation cell assays reveal that ERCC1-XPF interacts with TFIID and assembles with POL II and the basal transcription machinery on promoters in vivo. Whereas ERCC1-XPF is required for the initial activation of genes associated with growth, it is dispensable for ongoing transcription. Recruitment of ERCC1-XPF on promoters is accompanied by promoter-proximal DNA demethylation and histone marks associated with active hepatic transcription. Collectively, the data unveil a role of ERCC1/XPF endonuclease in transcription initiation establishing its causal contribution to NER developmental disorders.
Collapse
|
58
|
Kadonaga JT. Perspectives on the RNA polymerase II core promoter. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY 2011; 1:40-51. [PMID: 23801666 DOI: 10.1002/wdev.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The RNA polymerase II core promoter is sometimes referred to as the gateway to transcription. The core promoter is generally defined to be the stretch of DNA that directs the initiation of transcription. This simple description belies a complex multidimensional regulatory element, as there is considerable diversity in core promoter structure and function. Core promoters can be viewed at the levels of DNA sequences, transcription factors, and biological networks. Key DNA sequences are known as core promoter elements, which include the TATA box, initiator (Inr), polypyrimidine initiator (TCT), TFIIB recognition element (BRE), motif ten element (MTE), and downstream core promoter element (DPE) motifs. There are no universal core promoter elements that are present in all promoters. Different types of core promoters are transcribed by different sets of transcription factors and exhibit distinct properties, such as specific interactions with transcriptional enhancers, that are determined by the presence or absence of particular core promoter motifs. Moreover, some core promoter elements have been found to be associated with specific biological networks. For instance, the TCT motif is dedicated to the transcription of ribosomal protein genes in Drosophila and humans. In addition, nearly all of the Drosophila Hox genes have a DPE motif in their core promoters. The complexity of the core promoter is further seen in the relation among transcription initiation patterns, the stability or lability of transcriptional states, and the organization of the chromatin structure in the promoter region. Hence, the current data indicate that the core promoter is a critical component in the regulation of gene activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James T Kadonaga
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Papai G, Weil PA, Schultz P. New insights into the function of transcription factor TFIID from recent structural studies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2011; 21:219-24. [PMID: 21420851 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2010] [Accepted: 01/18/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The general transcription factor IID is a key player in the early events of gene expression. TFIID is a multisubunit complex composed of the TATA binding protein and at least 13 TBP associated factors (TAfs) which recognize the promoter of protein coding genes in an activator dependant way. This review highlights recent findings on the molecular architecture and dynamics of TFIID. The structural analysis of functional transcription complexes formed by TFIID, TFIIA, activators and/or promoter DNA illuminates the faculty of TFIID to adjust to various promoter architectures and highlights its role as a platform for preinitiation complex assembly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabor Papai
- Integrated Structural Biology Department, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), U964 Inserm, UMR7104 CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, 1 rue Laurent Fries, BP10142, 67404 Illkirch, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Papetti M, Augenlicht LH. MYBL2, a link between proliferation and differentiation in maturing colon epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol 2011; 226:785-91. [PMID: 20857481 DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Multiple signals, controlling both proliferation and differentiation, must be integrated in the reprogramming of intestinal epithelial cells during maturation along the crypt-luminal axis. The v-myb family member Mybl2, a molecule implicated in the development and maintenance of the stem cell phenotype, has been suggested to play an important role in proliferation and differentiation of several cell types and is a gene we have found is commonly regulated in several systems of colon cell maturation both in vitro and in vivo. Here we show that siRNA silencing of Mybl2 in proliferating Caco-2 cells increases expression of the cell-cycle regulators cdk2, cyclin D2, and c-myc and decreases expression of cdc25B and cyclin B2 with a consequent 10% increase of cells in G2/M and a complementary 10% decrease in G1. Mybl2 occupies sequences upstream of transcriptional start sites of cyclin D2, c-myc, cyclin B2, and cdc25B and regulates reporter activity driven by upstream regions of cdk2, cyclin D2, and c-myc. These data suggest that Mybl2 plays a subtle but key role in linking specific aspects of cell-cycle progression with generation of signals for differentiation and may therefore be fundamental in commitment of intestinal epithelial cells to differentiation pathways during their maturation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Papetti
- Department of Oncology, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10467, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Rach EA, Winter DR, Benjamin AM, Corcoran DL, Ni T, Zhu J, Ohler U. Transcription initiation patterns indicate divergent strategies for gene regulation at the chromatin level. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:e1001274. [PMID: 21249180 PMCID: PMC3020932 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2010] [Accepted: 12/13/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The application of deep sequencing to map 5' capped transcripts has confirmed the existence of at least two distinct promoter classes in metazoans: "focused" promoters with transcription start sites (TSSs) that occur in a narrowly defined genomic span and "dispersed" promoters with TSSs that are spread over a larger window. Previous studies have explored the presence of genomic features, such as CpG islands and sequence motifs, in these promoter classes, but virtually no studies have directly investigated the relationship with chromatin features. Here, we show that promoter classes are significantly differentiated by nucleosome organization and chromatin structure. Dispersed promoters display higher associations with well-positioned nucleosomes downstream of the TSS and a more clearly defined nucleosome free region upstream, while focused promoters have a less organized nucleosome structure, yet higher presence of RNA polymerase II. These differences extend to histone variants (H2A.Z) and marks (H3K4 methylation), as well as insulator binding (such as CTCF), independent of the expression levels of affected genes. Notably, differences are conserved across mammals and flies, and they provide for a clearer separation of promoter architectures than the presence and absence of CpG islands or the occurrence of stalled RNA polymerase. Computational models support the stronger contribution of chromatin features to the definition of dispersed promoters compared to focused start sites. Our results show that promoter classes defined from 5' capped transcripts not only reflect differences in the initiation process at the core promoter but also are indicative of divergent transcriptional programs established within gene-proximal nucleosome organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Rach
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Deborah R. Winter
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ashlee M. Benjamin
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - David L. Corcoran
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Ting Ni
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jun Zhu
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Uwe Ohler
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
When needles look like hay: how to find tissue-specific enhancers in model organism genomes. Dev Biol 2010; 350:239-54. [PMID: 21130761 DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2010] [Revised: 11/11/2010] [Accepted: 11/22/2010] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
A major prerequisite for the investigation of tissue-specific processes is the identification of cis-regulatory elements. No generally applicable technique is available to distinguish them from any other type of genomic non-coding sequence. Therefore, researchers often have to identify these elements by elaborate in vivo screens, testing individual regions until the right one is found. Here, based on many examples from the literature, we summarize how functional enhancers have been isolated from other elements in the genome and how they have been characterized in transgenic animals. Covering computational and experimental studies, we provide an overview of the global properties of cis-regulatory elements, like their specific interactions with promoters and target gene distances. We describe conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) and their internal structure, nucleotide composition, binding site clustering and overlap, with a special focus on developmental enhancers. Conflicting data and unresolved questions on the nature of these elements are highlighted. Our comprehensive overview of the experimental shortcuts that have been found in the different model organism communities and the new field of high-throughput assays should help during the preparation phase of a screen for enhancers. The review is accompanied by a list of general guidelines for such a project.
Collapse
|
63
|
Sugihara F, Kasahara K, Kokubo T. Highly redundant function of multiple AT-rich sequences as core promoter elements in the TATA-less RPS5 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 39:59-75. [PMID: 20805245 PMCID: PMC3017598 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In eukaryotes, protein-coding genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (pol II) together with general transcription factors (GTFs). TFIID, the largest GTF composed of TATA element-binding protein (TBP) and 14 TBP-associated factors (TAFs), plays a critical role in transcription from TATA-less promoters. In metazoans, several core promoter elements other than the TATA element are thought to be recognition sites for TFIID. However, it is unclear whether functionally homologous elements also exist in TATA-less promoters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we identify the cis-elements required to support normal levels of transcription and accurate initiation from sites within the TATA-less and TFIID-dependent RPS5 core promoter. Systematic mutational analyses show that multiple AT-rich sequences are required for these activities and appear to function as recognition sites for TFIID. A single copy of these sequences can support accurate initiation from the endogenous promoter, indicating that they carry highly redundant functions. These results show a novel architecture of yeast TATA-less promoters and support a model in which pol II scans DNA downstream from a recruited site, while searching for appropriate initiation site(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuminori Sugihara
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Graduate School of Nanobioscience, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
Parry TJ, Theisen JWM, Hsu JY, Wang YL, Corcoran DL, Eustice M, Ohler U, Kadonaga JT. The TCT motif, a key component of an RNA polymerase II transcription system for the translational machinery. Genes Dev 2010; 24:2013-8. [PMID: 20801935 DOI: 10.1101/gad.1951110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The TCT motif (polypyrimidine initiator) encompasses the transcription start site of nearly all ribosomal protein genes in Drosophila and mammals. The TCT motif is required for transcription of ribosomal protein gene promoters. The TCT element resembles the Inr (initiator), but is not recognized by TFIID and cannot function in lieu of an Inr. However, a single T-to-A substitution converts the TCT element into a functionally active Inr. Thus, the TCT motif is a novel transcriptional element that is distinct from the Inr. These findings reveal a specialized TCT-based transcription system that is directed toward the synthesis of ribosomal proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor J Parry
- Section of Molecular Biology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Müller F, Zaucker A, Tora L. Developmental regulation of transcription initiation: more than just changing the actors. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2010; 20:533-40. [PMID: 20598874 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2010.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2010] [Revised: 05/26/2010] [Accepted: 06/02/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The traditional model of transcription initiation nucleated by the TFIID complex has suffered significant erosion in the last decade. The discovery of cell-specific paralogs of TFIID subunits and a variety of complexes that replace TFIID in transcription initiation of protein coding genes have been paralleled by the description of diverse core promoter sequences. These observations suggest an additional level of regulation of developmental and tissue-specific gene expression at the core promoter level. Recent work suggests that this regulation may function through specific roles of distinct TBP-type factors and TBP-associated factors (TAFs), however the picture emerging is still far from complete. Here we summarize the proposed models of transcription initiation by alternative initiation complexes in distinct stages of developmental specialization during vertebrate ontogeny.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferenc Müller
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Division of Reproductive and Child Health, Institute of Biomedical Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Ni T, Corcoran DL, Rach EA, Song S, Spana EP, Gao Y, Ohler U, Zhu J. A paired-end sequencing strategy to map the complex landscape of transcription initiation. Nat Methods 2010; 7:521-7. [PMID: 20495556 PMCID: PMC3197272 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2009] [Accepted: 04/21/2010] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Recent high-throughput sequencing protocols have uncovered the complexity of mammalian transcription by RNA polymerase II, helping to define several initiation patterns in which transcription start sites (TSSs) cluster within both narrow and broad genomic windows. Here, we describe a paired-end sequencing strategy, which enables more robust mapping and characterization of capped transcripts. This strategy was applied to explore the transcription initiation landscape in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Extending the previous findings in mammals, we found that fly promoters exhibit distinct initiation patterns, which are linked to specific promoter sequence motifs. Furthermore, we identified a large number of 5′ capped transcripts originating from coding exons; analyses support that they are unlikely the result of alternative TSSs, but rather the product of post-transcriptional modifications. Taken together, paired-end TSS analysis is demonstrated to be a powerful method to uncover the transcriptional complexity of eukaryotic genomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Ni
- Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|