When pathological and radiological correlation is achieved, excision of fibroadenoma with lobular neoplasia on core biopsy is not warranted

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and management of lobular neoplasia (LN) including lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) remains controversial. Current management options after a core needle biopsy (CNB) with lobular neoplasia (LN) incorporating both ALH and LCIS include excision biopsy or careful clinical and radiologic follow up.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the surgical database at Cork University Hospital was performed to identify all core needle biopsies from January 1st 2010 to 31st December 2013 with a diagnosis of FA who subsequently underwent surgical excision biopsy. All cases with associated LN including ALH and classical LCIS were selected. We excluded cases with coexistent ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive carcinoma, LN associated with necrosis, pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) or lesions which would require excision in their own right (papilloma, radial scar, atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or flat epithelial atypia (FEA)). Cases in which the radiologic targeted mass was discordant with a diagnosis of FA were also excluded.

RESULTS

2878 consecutive CNB with a diagnosis of FA were identified. 25 cases had a diagnosis of concomitant ALH or classical LCIS. Our study cohort consisted of 21 women with a mean age 53 years (age range 41-70 years). The core biopsy diagnosis was of LCIS and FA in 16 cases and ALH and FA in 5 cases. On excision biopsy, a FA was confirmed in all 21 cases. In addition to the FA, residual LCIS was present in 14 cases with residual ALH in 2 cases. One of the twenty-one cases (4.8%) was upgraded to invasive ductal carcinoma on excision.

Lobular neoplasia diagnosed on breast Core biopsy: frequency of carcinoma on excision and implications for management

The appropriate follow-up and treatment for patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ) remains controversial. Several studies have attempted to address this issue, with recommendations ranging from close clinical follow-up or surveillance to mandatory surgical excision in all cases. We report the findings at our institution, where virtually every core needle biopsy diagnosis of lobular neoplasia results in follow-up excision. The goal of the study was to identify potential predictors of upgrade to a more significant lesion. We identified 76 patients over a 15-year period with a core biopsy diagnosis of pure lobular neoplasia and no other high-risk lesions. Subsequent surgical excision identified 10 cases (13%) that were upgraded to carcinoma. Upgrade diagnoses included invasive ductal carcinoma (n=1), invasive lobular carcinoma (n=4), ductal carcinoma in situ (n=3), and pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (n=2). All 10 upgraded cases had imaging findings suspicious for malignancy including irregular masses, asymmetric densities, or pleomorphic calcifications. Of the 10 upgraded cases, 7 were diagnosed as lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy. The data support a role for radiologic-pathologic correlation in the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions and suggest that the extent of lobular neoplasia in core biopsy specimens may be an indicator of the likelihood of upgrade to carcinoma.

Core Breast Biopsies Showing Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Should Be Excised and Surveillance Is Reasonable for Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to determine the upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma at excision at the same site after percutaneous breast biopsy findings of atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) using current imaging and strict pathologic criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2006 through September 2013, 32,960 breast core biopsies were performed; 1084 (3.3%) core biopsies found ALH or classic LCIS. For 447 lesions in 433 women, this was the only high-risk lesion at that site, with no ipsilateral malignancy, and results of excision were available.

RESULTS

Among the 447 lesions, 22 (4.9%) were malignant at excision, including 10 invasive carcinomas (two grade 2 and eight grade 1; all node negative) and 12 DCIS. The upgrade rate of LCIS was 9.3% (10/108; 95% CI, 5.1-16.2%) and that of ALH was 3.5% (12/339; 95% CI, 2.0-6.1%; p = 0.02). After excluding five cases with radiologic-pathologic discordance and reclassifying one core from ALH to LCIS at review, the upgrade rate for LCIS remained higher (8.4%; 9/107; 95% CI, 4.5-15.2%) than that for ALH (2.4%; 8/335; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6%; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Excision is recommended for LCIS on core biopsy because of its 8.4-9.3% upgrade rate. Excluding discordant cases, patients with other high-risk lesions or concurrent malignancy, the risk of upgrade of ALH was 2.4%. Surveillance at 6, 12, and 24 months can be performed in lieu of excision because a short delay in diagnosis of the few malignancies is not expected to cause harm.

Atypical epithelial hyperplasia of the breast: state of the art

INTRODUCTION

Atypical epithelial hyperplasia (AEH) of the breast is considered benign histological lesions with breast cancer risk. This review focuses on clinical signification and management of AEH that remains controversial.

AREAS COVERED

A review of published studies was performed using medline database. In this review, we fully describe the current evidence available. In particular, we describe 1) data from immunohistochemistry and molecular studies that suggest AEH is a precursor of breast cancer; 2) epidemiological studies demonstrate low rate of breast cancer in women with AEH; 3) surgical excision is necessary after diagnosis of AEH, such as lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical ductal hyperplasia, on core needle biopsy; 4) although current recommendations are evolving to fewer (if not no) excisions for flat epithelial with atypia and classic lobular neoplasia found on percutaneous biopsy (without radiologic indications for excision). Expert commentary: HEA management steel need prospective evidences, but recent retrospective data give some clue for less invasive management for some of HEA.

Surgical Outcomes of Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed in Core Biopsy: Prospective Study of 316 Cases

BACKGROUND

Management recommendations for lobular neoplasia (LN) including lobular carcinoma-in-situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) diagnosed in core biopsies (CB) are controversial. Our aim was to prospectively identify a subset of patients who do not require subsequent surgical excision (SE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients diagnosed with LN on CB were enrolled and referred for SE. Cases with coexistent ductal carcinoma-in-situ or invasive carcinoma were excluded. Cases with coexistent ductal atypia (LN-DA) and LCIS variants (LN-V) were separated from pure classic LN (LN-C). Dedicated breast pathologists and radiologists reviewed cases with careful imaging/pathology correlation.

RESULTS

Of 13,772 total percutaneous breast CB procedures, 302 of 370 patients diagnosed with LN underwent SE. Upgrade to carcinoma was present in 3.5% (8/228) LN-C, 26.7% LN-V (4/15), and 28.3% LN-DA (15/53). Calcifications were the imaging target for 180 (79%) of 228 LN-C cases; 7 were associated with upgrade (3.9%). Upgrades were rare for mass lesions (1/32) and magnetic resonance imaging-targeted lesions (0/14). Upgrades were similar for ALH and LCIS (3.4% vs. 4.5%). During postsurgical follow-up (mean, 34.5 months), 6.5% LN-C patients developed carcinoma in either breast.

CONCLUSION

Although LN with nonclassic morphology or with associated ductal atypia requires SE, this can be avoided in LN-C diagnosed on CB targeting calcifications when careful imaging/pathology correlation is applied. Until larger numbers are studied, excising LN-C diagnosed as masses or magnetic resonance imaging-detected lesions may be prudent. Regardless of their selection for surgical management, LN patients need close surveillance in view of their long-term risk of breast cancer.

The radiological features, diagnosis and management of screen-detected lobular neoplasia of the breast: Findings from the Sloane Project

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the radiological features, diagnosis and management of screen-detected lobular neoplasia (LN) of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

392 women with pure LN alone were identified within the prospective UK cohort study of screen-detected non-invasive breast neoplasia (the Sloane Project). Demography, radiological features and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were analysed.

RESULTS

Non-pleomorphic LN (369/392) was most frequently diagnosed among women aged 50-54 and in 53.5% was at the first screen. It occurred most commonly on the left (58.0%; p = 0.003), in the upper outer quadrant and confined to one site (single quadrant or retroareolar region). No bilateral cases were found. The predominant radiological feature was microcalcification (most commonly granular) which increased in frequency with increasing breast density. Casting microcalcification as a predominant feature had a significantly higher lesion size compared to granular and punctate patterns (p = 0.034). 326/369 (88.3%) women underwent surgery, including 17 who underwent >1 operation, six who had mastectomy and six who had axillary surgery. Two patients had radiotherapy and 15 had endocrine treatment. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (23/392) presented as granular microcalcification in 12; four women had mastectomy and six had radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Screen-detected LN occurs in relatively young women and is predominantly non-pleomorphic and unilateral. It is typically associated with granular or punctate microcalcification in the left upper outer quadrant. Management, including surgical resection, is highly variable and requires evidence-based guideline development.

Management of atypical lobular hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, and lobular carcinoma in situ

Atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ are rare proliferative breast lesions, growing inside ducts and terminal ducto-lobular units. They represent a marker of increased risk for breast cancer and a non-obligate precursor of malignancy. Evidence available on diagnosis and management is scarce. They are frequently found incidentally associated with other lesions, but can be visible through mammography, ultrasound or magnetic resonance. Due to the risk of underestimation, surgical excision is often performed. The analysis of imaging and histopathological characteristics could help identifying low-risk cases, for which surgery is not necessary. Chemopreventive agents can be used for risk reduction. Careful imaging follow up is mandatory; the role of breast MRI as screening modality is under discussion.

Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core needle biopsy of the breast: An incidental finding or are there characteristic imaging findings?

BACKGROUND

Atypical lobular hyperplasia and classic-type lobular carcinoma in situ, collectively known as lobular neoplasia, are classically described as incidental findings found on breast core-needle biopsy without distinguishing imaging characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate concordant imaging findings of lobular neoplasia identified at core-needle biopsy after careful radiologic-pathologic correlation.

METHODS

The pathology database was searched from October 1, 2006 to October 1, 2013 for breast biopsies yielding lobular neoplasia not associated with a coexistent malignancy or other high risk lesion in the biopsy specimen.

RESULTS

Of the 482 biopsies performed containing lobular neoplasia, 65 cases had lobular neoplasia as the highest risk lesion at core-needle biopsy. Of the 65 total cases in which lobular neoplasia was the highest risk lesion, 18 (28%) cases had concordant imaging correlates. 13 of 18 (72%) cases presented as calcifications on mammography and 5 of 18 (28%) presented on magnetic resonance imaging as a focus (n = 2) or non-mass enhancement (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

With careful radiologic-pathologic correlation, mammographically detected calcifications and foci or non-mass enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging can be considered concordant imaging findings of lobular neoplasia after breast core-needle biopsy.

Long term clinical follow-up of atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies

Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) may be associated with a relatively high incidence of invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on immediate excision when found on core needle biopsy of the breast. However, the long term significance of ADH and LCIS in a breast core needle biopsy is not as well characterised. We reviewed the results of all breast core needle biopsies with a diagnosis of ADH or LCIS and immediate excision from the years 2000-2004, and correlated the results with long term clinical follow-up. Of 175 biopsies with ADH, 53 (30.3%) had carcinoma (8 invasive, and 45 DCIS) at the time of immediate re-excision. Of 69 biopsies with LCIS, three (4.3%) had carcinoma (2 invasive, and 1 DCIS) at the time of immediate re-excision. A total of 14 (11.5%) patients with ADH and benign re-excisions developed invasive carcinoma (12) or DCIS (2) on follow-up. A total of 17 (25.8%) patients with LCIS and benign re-excisions developed invasive carcinoma (13) or DCIS (4) on follow-up. The risk of invasive carcinoma or DCIS on immediate re-excision was significantly higher for women with ADH than LCIS (p<0.001). Women with LCIS developed significantly more invasive carcinomas and DCIS than women with ADH on long term follow-up (p=0.01). Compared to women with fibrocystic changes (FCC) on core needle biopsy, the risk of developing invasive carcinoma or DCIS was significantly higher for women with ADH and benign initial re-excisions (95% CI 1.092-7.297, p=0.03), and women with LCIS and benign re-excisions (95% CI 3.028-18.657, p<0.001). Overall, 67/175 (38.3%) women with ADH and 20/69 (29.0%) women with LCIS on core needle biopsy either had carcinoma at the time of the biopsy or later developed carcinoma. Significantly more women with LCIS developed invasive carcinoma or DCIS than women with ADH on long term follow-up. The relative risk for ADH and LCIS on core biopsy with a negative excision compared with FCC was similar to that reported in the literature (ADH 1-7×, LCIS 3-19×).

Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Radiologic-Pathologic Features and Clinical Management

BACKGROUND

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) is an unusual variant of LCIS for which optimal management remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a 15-year (2000-2014) retrospective chart review of the radiologic, pathologic, clinical management, and recurrence rates of patients with PLCIS on diagnostic biopsy. Fifty-one patients were found to have PLCIS either alone or with concomitant breast cancer. Of these, 23 were found to have pure PLCIS on diagnostic biopsy. Rates of upstaging after local excision, positive or close margins, mastectomy, and recurrence associated with pure pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ were examined.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients who underwent surgical excision following diagnostic biopsy, 33.3 % (7/21) were found to have invasive carcinoma, and 19 % (4/23) were found to have ductal carcinoma in situ. Extensive or multifocal PLCIS was present in 47.6 % (10/21) of patients, corresponding to at least one PLCIS-positive or close margin in 71.4 % (15/21). In total, there were 11 local re-excisions in nine patients, and 12 mastectomies. No ipsilateral breast cancer events have occurred, including in those with positive or close surgical margins (mean follow-up 4.1 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with isolated PLCIS on diagnostic biopsy are at high risk of upgrading to invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ at diagnostic excision. PLCIS often is extensive, with high rates of positive or close surgical resection margins. If negative PLCIS margins are pursued, rates of successful breast conservation are low. In light of this and low recurrence rates, caution should be exercised in aggressively treating PLCIS with excision to clear margins.

[Benign proliferative breast disease with and without atypia]

In the last few years, diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia [ADH], flat epithelial atypia [FEA], lobular neoplasia: atypical lobular hyperplasia [ALH], lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS], radial scar [RS], usual ductal hyperplasia [UDH], adenosis, sclerosing adenosis [SA], papillary breast lesions, mucocele-like lesion [MLL]) have increased with the growing number of breast percutaneous biopsies. The management of these lesions is highly conditioned by the enlarged risk of breast cancer combined with either an increased probability of finding cancer after surgery, either a possible malignant transformation (in situ or invasive cancer), or an increased probability of developing cancer on the long range. An overview of the literature reports grade C recommendations concerning the management and follow-up of these lesions: in case of ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS, RS, MLL with atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: surgical excision is recommended; in case of a diagnostic based on vacuum-assisted core biopsy with complete disappearance of radiological signal for FEA or RS without atypia: surgical abstention is a valid alternative approved by multidisciplinary meeting. In case of ALH (incidental finding) associated with benign lesion responsible of radiological signal: abstention may be proposed; in case of UDH, adenosis, MLL without atypia, diagnosed on percutaneous biopsies: the concordance of radiology and histopathology findings must be ensured. No data is available to recommend surgery; in case of non-in sano resection for ADH, FEA, ALH, LCIS (except pleomorphic type), RS, MLL: surgery does not seem to be necessary; in case of previous ADH, ALH, LCIS: a specific follow-up is recommended in accordance with HAS's recommendations. In case of FEA and RS or MLL combined with atypia, little data are yet available to differ the management from others lesions with atypia; in case of UDH, usual sclerosing adenosis, RS without atypia, fibro cystic disease: no specific follow-up is recommended in agreement with HAS's recommendations.

Incidence of Adjacent Synchronous Invasive Carcinoma and/or Ductal Carcinoma In-situ in Patients with Lobular Neoplasia on Core Biopsy: Results from a Prospective Multi-Institutional Registry (TBCRC 020)

BACKGROUND

Lobular neoplasia (LN) represents a spectrum of atypical proliferative lesions, including atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma-in-situ. The need for excision for LN found on core biopsy (CB) is controversial. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional trial (TBCRC 20) to determine the rate of upgrade to cancer after excision for pure LN on CB.

METHODS

Patients with a CB diagnosis of pure LN were prospectively identified and consented to excision. Cases with discordant imaging and those with additional lesions requiring excision were excluded. Upgrade rates to cancer were quantified on the basis of local and central pathology review. Confidence intervals and sample size were based on exact binomial calculations.

RESULTS

A total of 77 of 79 registered patients underwent excision (median age 51 years, range 27-82 years). Two cases (3%; 95% confidence interval 0.3-9) were upgraded to cancer (one tubular carcinoma, one ductal carcinoma-in-situ) at excision per local pathology. Central pathology review of 76 cases confirmed pure LN in the CB in all but two cases. In one case, the tubular carcinoma identified at excision was also found in the CB specimen, and in the other, LN was not identified, yielding an upgrade rate of one case (1%; 95% CI 0.01-7) by central pathology review.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study of 77 patients with pure LN on CB, the upgrade rate was 3% by local pathology and 1% by central pathology review, demonstrating that routine excision is not indicated for patients with pure LN on CB and concordant imaging findings.

Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) of the breast: is long-term outcome similar to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? Analysis of 200 cases

Background

Lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS) represent 1-2% of all breast cancers. Both significance and treatment remain widely debated, as well as the possible similarities with DCIS.

Materials and methods

Two hundred patients with pure LCIS were retrospectively analyzed in seven centres from 1990 to 2008. Median age was 52 years; 176 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and 24 mastectomy. Seventeen patients received whole breast irradiation (WBRT) after BCS and 20 hormonal treatment (15 by tamoxifen).

Results

With a 144-month median follow-up (FU), there were no local recurrences (LR) among 24 patients treated by mastectomy. With the same FU, 3 late LR out of 17 (17%) occurred in patients treated by BCS and WBRT (with no LR at 10 years). Among 159 patients treated by BCS alone, 20 developed LR (13%), but with only a 72-month FU (17.5% at 10 years). No specific LR risk factors were identified. Three patients developed metastases, two after invasive LR; 22 patients (11%) developed contralateral BC (59% invasive) and another five had second cancer.

Conclusions

LCIS is not always an indolent disease. The long-term outcome is quite similar to most ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS). The main problems are the accuracy of pathological definition and a clear identification of more aggressive subtypes, in order to avoid further invasive LR. BCS + WBRT should be discussed in some selected cases, and the long-term results seem comparable to DCIS.

Management of flat epithelial atypia on breast core biopsy may be individualized based on correlation with imaging studies

Flat epithelial atypia of the breast commonly co-exists with atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular neoplasia, and indolent forms of invasive carcinomas such as tubular carcinoma. Most patients with pure flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy undergo surgical excision to evaluate for carcinoma in the adjacent breast tissue. Studies to date have reported varying upgrade rates with most recommending follow-up excision. These studies have often lacked detailed radiographic correlation, central review by breast pathologists and information regarding the biology of the carcinomas identified upon excision. In this study, we report the frequency of upgrade to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ in excision specimens following a diagnosis of pure flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy. Radiographic correlation is performed for each case and grade/receptor status of detected carcinomas is reported. Seventy-three (73) core biopsies containing pure flat epithelial atypia were identified from our files, meeting inclusion criteria for the study. In the subsequent excision biopsies, five (7%) cases contained invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ and seventeen (23%) contained atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular neoplasia. All of the ductal carcinoma in situ cases with estrogen receptor results were estrogen receptor positive and intermediate grade. The invasive tumors were small (pT1a) hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, low-grade invasive ductal or tubular carcinomas with negative sentinel lymph-node biopsies. No upgrades were identified in the 14 patients who had all of their calcifications removed by the stereotactic core biopsy. Our rate of upgrade to carcinoma, once cases with discordant imaging are excluded, is at the lower end of the range reported in the literature. Given the low upgrade rate and indolent nature of the carcinomas associated with flat epithelial atypia, case management may be individualized based on clinical and radiographic findings. Excision may not be necessary for patients without remaining calcifications following core biopsy.

Malignancy rates after surgical excision of discordant breast biopsies

BACKGROUND

Vacuum-assisted core-needle biopsy (VAB) is increasingly used to perform breast biopsies instead of automated-gun core-needle biopsy (CNB). The significance of discordance between radiologic and pathologic findings has not been well established in the era of VAB predominance. This retrospective study was conducted to determine the rate of malignancy after surgical excisional biopsy (EXB) of these lesions at our two institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed medical records from January 2008-June 2013 to identify female patients who underwent EXB for a Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions found to be benign and discordant on CNB. Clinicopathologic data were gathered, and analysis was performed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 8081 core biopsies were performed in the study timeframe. Six of 81 (7.4%) patients who had an EXB for a benign discordant breast lesion were found to have malignant pathology (two invasive, four in situ). Four of 63 (6.3%) lesions originally biopsied by VAB were upgraded, compared with 2 of 17 (11.8%) originally biopsied by CNB. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of upgrade to malignancy when data were stratified by BI-RADS score or method of biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of malignancy after EXB of benign discordant lesions was 7.4%. Despite the widespread adoption of VAB, EXB is still warranted for clarification of discordant radiologic-pathologic findings.

Current management of lesions associated with an increased risk of breast cancer

High-risk breast lesions, which comprise benign lesions and in situ carcinomas (lobular carcinoma in situ and ductal carcinoma in situ), are clinically, morphologically, and biologically heterogeneous and are associated with an increased risk of invasive breast cancer development, albeit to varying degrees. Recognition and proactive management of such lesions can help to prevent progression to invasive disease, and might, therefore, reduce breast cancer incidence, morbidity, and mortality. However, this opportunity comes with the possibility of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, necessitating risk-based intervention. Notably, despite the progress in defining the molecular changes associated with carcinogenesis, alterations identifying the individuals with high-risk lesions that will progress to invasive carcinoma remain to be identified. Thus, until reproducible clinicopathological or molecular features predicting an individual's risk of breast cancer are found, management strategies must be defined by population-level risks as determined by models such as the Gail or IBIS models, as well as patient attitudes toward the risks and benefits of interventions. Herein, we review the contemporary approaches to diagnosis and management of high-risk breast lesions. Progress in this area will ultimately be dependent on the ability to individualize risk prediction through better definition of the key drivers in the carcinogenic process.

[Breast surgeon role in the management of high-risk breast lesions]

Diagnostics of high-risk breast lesions have increased these last years with the augmentation of breast percutaneous biopsies. They are lesions that confer an enlarged risk of breast cancer, either because of an increased probability of finding cancer after open surgery, a possible evolution toward in situ or invasive cancer, or because of an increased probability of developing breast cancer over the long term. Much progress has been made these last years in their histological diagnostic, classification and pathogenesis. Nevertheless, no consensus exists to date on the management of these "high-risk" lesions. In particular, surgical indications and follow-up modalities remain controversial for each histological type. In this review, the principal factors that could impact surgical decision and long-term follow-up are discussed with areas of controversy highlighted.

Lobular neoplasia

Lobular neoplasia (LN) is characterized by a dysfunctional E-cadherin-catenin axis, and loss of E-cadherin plays a causative role in the typical morphology of LN cells. LN is both a nonobligate precursor and a risk indicator of invasive breast cancer, and in particular, of invasive lobular carcinoma. Despite the evidence supporting the precursor role of LN, its impact on clinical management has been a matter of controversy, and conservative management remains the mainstay of treatment. In this article, an update is provided on the pathology and genetics of LN, and the management of these lesions in surgical practice is discussed.

Diagnosis and management of benign, atypical, and indeterminate breast lesions detected on core needle biopsy

Imaging abnormalities detected by mammographic screening often lead to diagnostic evaluations, with suspicious abnormalities subjected to image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) to exclude malignancy. Most CNBs reveal benign pathological alterations, termed benign breast disease (BBD). Adoption of CNB presents challenges with pathologic classification of breast abnormalities and management of patients with benign or atypical histological findings. Patient management and counseling after CNB diagnosis of BBD depends on postbiopsy determination of radiologic-pathologic concordancy. Communication between radiologists and pathologists is crucial in patient management. Management is dependent on the histological type of BBD. Patients with concordant pathologic imaging results can be reassured of benign biopsy findings and advised about the future risk of developing breast cancer. Surgical consultation is advised for patients with discordant findings, symptomatic patients, and high-risk lesions. This review highlights benign breast lesions that are encountered on CNB and summarizes management strategies. For this review, we conducted a search of PubMed, with no date limitations, and used the following search terms (or a combination of terms): atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, benign breast disease, cellular fibroepithelial lesions, columnar cell lesions, complex sclerosing lesion, core needle biopsy, fibroadenomas, flat epithelial atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ, lobular neoplasia, mucocele-like lesions, phyllodes tumor, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, radial scar, and vascular lesions. The selection of references included in this review was based on study relevance and quality. We used additional articles culled from the bibliographies of retrieved articles to examine the published evidence for risk factors of BBD.

Most lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed on core needle biopsy can be managed clinically with radiologic follow-up in a multidisciplinary setting

We evaluated the efficacy of using standard radiologic and histologic criteria to guide the follow-up of patients with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), lobular neoplasia (LN), or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). Patients with high-risk benign lesions diagnosed on biopsy were presented and reviewed in a multidisciplinary clinical management conference from 1 November 2003 through September 2011. Associations between patient characteristics and rates of upgrade were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic models, and times to diagnosis carcinoma were calculated. Of 853 cases reviewed, 124 (14.5%) were lobular neoplasms. In all, 104 patients were clinically and/or radiographically monitored. In 20 patients, who were found to have LN on core biopsy and were recommended to have immediate surgical excision, a more significant lesion was identified in 8 (40%) of the excised specimens. Factors associated with a more significant lesion on excisional biopsy included whether the lobular lesion had been targeted for biopsy and whether the extent of disease involved three or more terminal duct lobular units. Of the 104 patients radiographically and clinically monitored, the median follow-up time was 3.4 years with a range of 0.44–8.6 years. Five patients under surveillance were subsequently diagnosed with breast malignancy (three of the five at a site unrelated to the initial biopsy). Patients with incidental lobular lesions identified on percutaneous core needle biopsy have a small risk of upgrade and may not require an excisional biopsy. Clinical management of low-volume lobular lesions in a multidisciplinary setting is an efficacious alternative to surgical excision when radiologic and histologic characteristics are well-defined.

Evolving concepts in breast lobular neoplasia and invasive lobular carcinoma, and their impact on imaging methods

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and lobular neoplasia (LN) are two distinct conditions that still pose challenges regarding to their classification, diagnosis and management. Although they share similar cellular characteristics, such as discohesive neoplastic cells and absence of e-cadherin staining, they represent completely different conditions. LN encompasses atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), which are currently considered risk factors and non-obligatory precursors of breast neoplasia. These lesions are diagnosed as incidental findings in percutaneous biopsies or appear as non-specific clusters of punctate calcifications in mammograms. ILC is the second most common breast malignancy and has typical histological features, such as infiltrative growth and low desmoplasia. These histological features are reflected in imaging findings and constitute the reasons for typical subtle mammographic features of ILC, as architectural distortion or focal asymmetries. Ultrasonography (US) may detect almost 75 % of the ILCs missed by mammography and represents the modality of choice for guiding biopsies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibits a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of ILC and for detecting synchronous lesions.

Teaching Points

• LN includes ALH and LCIS, risk factors and non-obligatory precursors of breast cancer.

• Absence of e-cadherin staining is crucial for differentiation among ductal and lobular lesions.

• ILC has typical histological features, such as infiltrative growth and low desmoplasia.

• Mammographic features of ILC are often subtle and reflect the histological features.

• MRI exhibits a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of ILC and for detecting synchronous lesions.

When is excision necessary for atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ?

SUMMARY This management perspective briefly covers the histology and molecular features of lobular in situ neoplasia and provides an in-depth discussion of the need for surgical excision if lobular in situ neoplasia is diagnosed on core-needle biopsy. The management of lobular in situ neoplasia found on core-needle biopsy has been an area of recent study with varying results. Emerging data suggest that low-risk patients with a limited extent of isolated classic lobular in situ neoplasia found on core-needle biopsy may not require subsequent surgical excision. However, high-risk patients, those with extensive lobular in situ neoplasia, or other high-risk lesions noted on core-needle biopsy likely benefit from surgical excision. Most authors recommend surgical excision when pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ is found on core-needle biopsy due to its higher association with invasive carcinoma. However, the natural history of this more recently described variant of lobular carcinoma in situ is not fully defined, and the clinical management of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ on excisional biopsy is yet to be determined.

Wide local extension and higher proliferation indices are characteristic features of symptomatic lobular neoplasias (LNs) and LNs with an early invasive component

AIMS

Lobular neoplasias (LNs) are typically small, clinically undetectable breast lesions, but some LNs are of clinical significance. The aim of this study was to clarify the histopathological characteristics of clinically overt (symptomatic) LNs and early invasive LNs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty-two surgically resected LNs, including eight with early invasion (≤10 mm), were classified into the following groups: (i) symptomatic and occult; and (ii) early invasive and non-invasive. Six histopathological factors, including the Ki67 labelling index (LI), were assessed and analysed by logistic regression models. On multivariate analysis, tumour size (P = 0.008), mitotic counts (P = 0.006) and Ki67 LI (P = 0.035) were risk factors for symptomatic features, and tumour size (P = 0.009) and Ki67 LI (P = 0.015) were risk factors for early invasive lesions. In the eight LNs with invasion, the symptomatic and occult subgroups showed differing nuclear atypia and structural patterns, but both lesions extended widely (22-96 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Wide extension and higher proliferation activity were characteristic features of symptomatic LNs and LNs with early invasion.

Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core breast biopsy: use of careful radiologic-pathologic correlation to recommend excision or observation

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of precise radiologic and pathologic correlation for establishing imaging-histologic concordance or discordance as a method to limit the number of patients requiring surgical excision when atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is diagnosed at core biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. The pathology database was searched from 2000 to 2010 for core biopsies yielding ALH or LCIS devoid of any additional lesion that independently necessitated excision. All cases had to have either subsequent surgical excision or a minimum of 2 years of imaging follow-up. This yielded 50 cases from 49 women aged 40-73 years (mean age, 59 years). The authors performed detailed radiologic-pathologic analysis while blinded to subsequent follow-up information, comparing all biopsy-related images with the histologic findings at core biopsy and then designating each core biopsy finding as concordant or discordant. Then, results of subsequent surgery or extended follow-up for each case were unblinded and compared with original concordant or discordant designations. Outcomes and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 43 benign concordant core biopsy findings, none were upgraded at surgery (n = 38) or extended follow-up (n = 5) (95% CI: 0%, 8%). Of the seven discordant biopsy findings, two were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ at surgery (n = 5); none of the cases were upgraded at follow-up (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

When careful radiologic-pathologic correlation is performed and concordance is achieved, women with ALH or LCIS at core biopsy can be observed.

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ

SUMMARY Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS), the cytologic in situ correlate of invasive pleomorphic carcinoma (iPLC), was first recognized as an entity in 2002; however, previous descriptions of in situ lesions in association with iPLC were made in 1992. Recognition of the pleomorphic subtype of lobular carcinoma in situ is important because the combination of cellular features, necrosis and calcification can lead to difficulty in differentiating it from ductal carcinoma in situ and classic lobular carcinoma in situ, lesions for which standard treatment algorithms are supported by data regarding their natural history and risk of subsequent cancer. This article addresses the histological and molecular features that distinguish PLCIS from classic lobular carcinoma in situ and other variants of lobular neoplasia, describes the relationship between PLCIS and iPLC, reviews current challenges in the clinical management of PLCIS and provides a framework for future investigation.

Lobular intraepithelial neoplasia arising within breast fibroadenoma

Background

Fibroadenomas are the second most common breast pathology occurring in young women under the age of 35 years old. Fibroadenomas can be classified as simple or complex according to histological features. Complex fibroadenomas differ from simple fibroadenomas because of the presence of cysts (3 mm), sclerosing adenosis, epithelial calcifications, or papillary apocrine changes. Most fibroadenomas are clinically identifiable. In 25% of cases, fibroadenomas are non-palpable and are diagnosed with mammography and ultrasound. Differential diagnosis with well differentiated breast cancer is often necessary, particularly with medullary or mucinous tumors. Calcification findings within fibroadenomas by mammogram have to be investigated. The age of a lump is usually reflected by calcifications. Microcalcification can hide foci of carcinoma in situ when they are small, branching type, and heterogeneous. However, many morphological possibilities may not be reliable for deciding whether a certain calcification is the product of a malignant or a benign process. From a radiological point of view, fibroadenomas containing foci of carcinoma in situ can be indistinguishable from benign lesions, even if the incidence of carcinoma within fibroadenomas is estimated as 0.1–0.3%, and it could be a long-term risk factor for invasive breast cancer.

Case presentation

A 44-year-old woman presented with a 1.5-cm palpable, smooth, mobile lump in the lower-inner quadrant of her right breast. Standard mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammograms showed a cluster of eccentric popcorn-like calcifications within the fibroadenoma. After lumpectomy, a definitive histological examination confirmed the intra-operative diagnosis of a benign mass. However, lobular intraepithelial neoplasia foci were found, surrounded by atypical lobular hyperplasia.

Conclusions

The possibility of an old benign breast lump might be supported by fine needle aspiration biopsy or core biopsy before initiating follow-up. According to our experience, when patients are older than 40 years and have a familial history of breast cancer, we prefer to carry out lumpectomy with follow up to avoid the risk of underestimation in situ foci within the lump.

Pathologic Upgrade Rates on Subsequent Excision When Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Is the Primary Diagnosis in the Needle Core Biopsy With Special Attention to the Radiographic Target

Context.—Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) as the primary pathologic diagnosis in a needle core biopsy is an infrequent finding, and the management of patients in this setting is controversial.

Objective.—To determine the rate of pathologic upgrade (defined as the presence of a clinically more-significant lesion in the subsequent excision) in patients with a primary pathologic diagnosis of LCIS in the needle core biopsy.

Design.—Patients with a primary diagnosis of LCIS in a needle core biopsy who underwent subsequent excision were identified. Core biopsies containing a concurrent high-risk lesion and cases with radiologic-pathologic discordance were excluded. The presence of selected microscopic features in the needle core biopsy was correlated with pathologic upgrade. Microscopic findings were correlated with the radiographic target in the needle core biopsy.

Results.—Sixty-one women with primary LCIS in their needle core biopsy showed a 10% pathologic upgrade rate. The percentage of cores involved by LCIS was significantly associated with pathologic upgrade (P= .04), whereas the remaining measured parameters were not. When LCIS represented the radiographic target, the pathologic upgrade rate was 18%, whereas when it was an incidental finding, the pathologic upgrade rate was 4%.

Conclusions.—It may be reasonable for patients with primary, yet incidental, LCIS on needle core biopsy to be managed in a nonsurgical fashion. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Classic lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: a clinical and radio-pathologic correlation study with follow-up excision biopsy

There are no consensus guidelines for the management of lobular neoplasia diagnosed on core biopsy as the highest risk factor for cancer. This study aimed to assess the risk of upgrade (invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ) at the site of the lobular neoplasia and any clinical, radiological or pathologic factors associated with the upgrade. We reviewed all cases with a diagnosis of lobular neoplasia on core biopsy from June 2006 to June 2011. Any cases with radio-pathologic discordance, coexistent lesion that required excision (atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, duct papilloma or radial scar) or non-classic variant of lobular carcinoma in situ (pleomorphic, mixed ductal and lobular, lobular carcinoma in situ with necrosis) were excluded from the study. Core biopsy indications included calcification in 35 (40%), non-mass like enhancement in 19 (22%), mass lesion in 31 (36%) and mass as well as calcification in two cases (2%). Follow-up excisions were studied for the presence of upgrade. The study cohort included 87 cases and showed an upgrade of 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 1-10%). Three cases showed an upgrade (one ductal carcinoma in situ and two invasive cancers). All upgraded cases were breast imaging-reporting and data system score ≥4 and associated with atypical duct hyperplasia or in situ or invasive cancer in prior or concurrent biopsies in either breast. The number of cores and lobules involved, pagetoid duct involvement, presence of microcalcification in lobular neoplasia, needle gauge and number of cores obtained showed no correlation with the upgrade. Our results suggest that with radio-pathologic concordance and no prior biopsy proven risk for breast cancer, core biopsy finding of lobular neoplasia as the highest risk lesion can be appropriately and safely managed with clinical and radiologic follow-up as an alternative to surgical excision.

Morphological parameters of lobular in situ neoplasia in stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy do not predict the presence of malignancy on subsequent surgical excision

AIMS

The management of lobular in situ neoplasia (LN) when diagnosed on core biopsy remains a controversial issue. The present study aimed to investigate the association between morphological parameters of LN on vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy (VANCB) and the presence of malignancy (ductal carcinoma in situ, pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma) at surgical excision (SE).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 14 pathology departments in Italy. Available slides from 859 cases of VANCB reporting an original diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia, atypical ductal hyperplasia or LN, all with subsequent surgical excision, were reviewed. Overall, 286 cases of LN, pure or associated with other lesions, were identified, and a malignant outcome was reported at excision for 51 cases (17.8%). Among the 149 cases of pure LN, an increased risk of malignancy emerged in women in mammographic categories R4-R5 as compared with those in categories R2-R3 (OR 2.46; P = 0.048). In the series, a statistically significant decreased malignancy risk emerged among cases without determinant microcalcifications (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the diagnosis of pure LN on VANCB warrants follow-up excision, because clinicopathological parameters do not allow the prediction of which cases will present carcinoma at surgical excision.

Surgical management of high-risk breast lesions

High-risk lesions of the breast are lesions that confer an increased risk of breast cancer, either because of an increased probability of finding cancer associated with percutaneous biopsy findings or because of an increased probability of developing breast cancer over the long term. Atypical ductal hyperplasia found on percutaneous biopsy is generally excised, whereas lobular neoplasia lesions, including both atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ, may be observed if radiologic and pathologic findings are concordant and there is no other high-risk lesion present.

Is excisional biopsy required after a breast core biopsy yields lobular neoplasia?

OBJECTIVE

The management of lobular neoplasia (LN) on percutaneous core breast biopsies remains controversial. Published upgrade rates after surgical excision vary widely. This study aims to determine the frequency of malignancy following excision in patients with LN found on core biopsy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Our study identified patients from December 2005 through December 2010 with LN as the highest-risk lesion on core biopsy. Patients with flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy were not excluded. Per institutional policy, excision was routinely recommended. An upgrade from the core biopsy of LN was defined as excisional biopsy pathology that revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC).

RESULTS

Between December 2005 and December 2010, 4472 percutaneous breast biopsies were performed, with 71 patients (1.5%) having LN as the highest-risk lesion on core biopsy. Sixty-seven patients (94%) underwent excision. The upgrade rate on excisional biopsy was 16% (11/67 patients), with the type of malignancy on excisional biopsy pathology as follows: DCIS, 36% (4/11); IDC, 18% (2/11); and ILC, 45% (5/11). All patients with pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ on core biopsy who proceeded to excision were upgraded to malignancy. After excluding patients with discordant results, patients with pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ, and patients with flat epithelial atypia on core biopsy, the upgrade rate of pure LN on excisional biopsy was 9%.

CONCLUSION

LN on core biopsy warrants excisional biopsy given the upgrade rate to malignancy.

Classic lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia at percutaneous breast core biopsy: outcomes of prospective excision

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the need to excise breast lesions that yield classic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) (known together as classic lobular neoplasia [LN]) as the highest risk lesion at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB). Here, the authors report findings from 72 consecutive lesions with LN at CNB and prospective surgical excision (EXB).

METHODS

Lesions that yielded LN at CNB at the authors' center have been referred for EXB since June 2004, regardless of imaging-histologic concordance. A lesion was "concordant" if histologic findings provided sufficient explanation for imaging. An upgrade consisted of ductal carcinoma in situ and/or invasive carcinoma at EXB. Statistical analysis, including 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was performed.

RESULTS

Between June 2004 and May 2009, CNB of 85 consecutive lesions yielded LN without other high-risk histologies. Eighty of 85 lesions (94%) underwent prospective EXB. Seventy-two of 85 lesions (90%; 42 LCIS, 30 ALH) had concordant imaging-histologic findings. EXB yielded low-grade carcinoma in 2 of 72 cases (3%; 95% CI, 0%-9%). In both patients, stereotactic, 11-gauge, vacuum-assisted biopsy of calcifications yielded calcifications in benign parenchyma and ALH. CNB results were discordant in 8 of 80 lesions (10%; 4 LCIS, 4 ALH), and EXB yielded cancer in 3 of those 8 lesions (38%; 95% CI, 9%-76%). The upgrade rate was significantly higher for discordant lesions versus concordant lesions (38% vs 3%; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective excision of LN identified carcinoma in 3% (95% CI, 0%-9%) of concordant cases versus 38% (95% CI, 9%-76%) of discordant cases. The current data provide an unbiased assessment of the upgrade rate of LN diagnosed at CNB.

Long-term follow-up of lobular neoplasia (atypical lobular hyperplasia/lobular carcinoma in situ) diagnosed on core needle biopsy

BACKGROUND

Lobular neoplasia (LN) includes atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). LN often is an incidental finding on breast core needle biopsy (CNBx) and management remains controversial. Our objective was to define the incidence of malignancy in women diagnosed with pure LN on CNBx, and identify a subset of patients that may be observed.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LN on CNB between January 1993 and December 2010 were identified. Patients with an associated high-risk lesion or ipsilateral malignancy at time of diagnosis were excluded. All cases were reviewed by dedicated breast pathologists and breast imagers for pathologic classification and radiologic concordance, respectively.

RESULTS

The study cohort was comprised of 184 (1.3 %) cases of pure LN (147 ALH, 37 LCIS) from 180 patients. Pathologic-radiologic concordance was achieved in 171 (93 %) cases. Excision was performed in 101 (55 %) cases and 83 (45 %) were observed. Mean follow-up was 50.3 (range, 6-212) months. Of cases excised, 1 of 81 (1.2 %) ALH and 1 of 20 (5 %) LCIS cases were upstaged to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), respectively. Only 1 of 101 (1 %) concordant lesions was upstaged on excision. Of the cases observed, 4 of 65 (6.2 %) developed ipsilateral cancer during follow-up: 1 of 51 (2 %) case of ALH and 3 of 14 (21.4 %) cases with LCIS (2 ILC, 2 DCIS). During follow-up, 2.9 % (4/138) patients with excised or observed LN developed a contralateral cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support that not all patients with LN diagnosed on CNB require surgical excision. Patients with pure ALH, demonstrating radiologic-pathologic concordance, may be safely observed.