Fluoxetine counteracts the cognitive and cellular effects of 5-fluorouracil in the rat hippocampus by a mechanism of prevention rather than recovery

Neurobiological changes by cytotoxic agents in mice

Cognitive deficit is a frequently reported side-effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. A large number of animal studies has been performed to examine the neurobiological mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, however, definite conclusions from these studies are restricted due to differences in experimental set-up. We systematically investigated the effects of 6 cytotoxic agents on various neurobiological parameters. C57Bl/6J mice were treated with cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, or topotecan. The animals were sacrificed 3 or 15 weeks after treatment and the effect on neurogenesis, blood vessel density, and neuroinflammation was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. None of the cytostatic agents tested affected neurogenesis (cell survival or cell proliferation). Blood vessel density was increased in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex 3 weeks after treatment with docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with control animals. A decrease in the number of microglial cells was observed in the prefrontal cortex after treatment with cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, 5-FU, and topotecan compared with control mice. The observed decrease in microglia cells is indicative of inflammation that occurred after treatment. Overall, the magnitude of the effects was relatively modest. Therefore, we conducted a similar study with topotecan in Abcg2;Abcb1a/b knock out and wildtype FVB mice. Animals were sacrificed 3 weeks after treatment and no notable effect was seen in hippocampal cell differentiation (DCX), microglia activation, or blood vessel density. Perhaps the FVB strain is more resistant to the neurotoxic effects of topotecan which makes this not the correct model to study the mechanism of chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment.

Early and late long-term effects of adjuvant chemotherapy

Adjuvant chemotherapy continues to play an important role in breast cancer management. Exposure to chemotherapy can lead to a variety of early and late long-term toxicities, including ovarian failure (with resultant infertility and sexual dysfunction), bone loss, weight gain, neurotoxicity, neurocognitive changes, cardiac toxicity and secondary malignancy. Although chemotherapy effects may vary in medical severity, all effects have the potential to lead to a decrease in quality of life and a decrement on overall health status. Improved understanding of the etiology and management of chemotherapy-related toxicity may allow optimization of patient selection for treatment and ameliorate the concerns of patients who are considering embarking on a chemotherapy program. This article presents an overview of relevant early and late long-term toxicities, with a focus on recent advances and clinical management.

Chemotherapy, cognitive impairment and hippocampal toxicity

Cancer therapies can be associated with significant central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. While radiation-induced brain damage has been long recognized both in pediatric and adult cancer patients, CNS toxicity from chemotherapy has only recently been acknowledged. Clinical studies suggest that the most frequent neurotoxic adverse effects associated with chemotherapy include memory and learning deficits, alterations of attention, concentration, processing speed and executive function. Preclinical studies have started to shed light on how chemotherapy targets the CNS both on cellular and molecular levels to disrupt neural function and brain plasticity. Potential mechanisms include direct cellular toxicity, alterations in cellular metabolism, oxidative stress, and induction of pro-inflammatory processes with subsequent disruption of normal cellular and neurological function. Damage to neural progenitor cell populations within germinal zones of the adult CNS has been identified as one of the key mechanisms by which chemotherapy might exert long-lasting and progressive neurotoxic effects. Based on the important role of the hippocampus for maintenance of brain plasticity throughout life, several experimental studies have focused on the study of chemotherapy effects on hippocampal neurogenesis and associated learning and memory. An increasing body of literature from both animal studies and neuroimaging studies in cancer patients suggests a possible relationship between chemotherapy induced hippocampal damage and the spectrum of neurocognitive deficits and mood alterations observed in cancer patients. This review aims to briefly summarize current preclinical and neuroimaging studies that are providing a potential link between the neurotoxic effects of chemotherapy and hippocampal dysfunction, highlighting challenges and future directions in this field of investigation.

Redox biology in normal cells and cancer: restoring function of the redox/Fyn/c-Cbl pathway in cancer cells offers new approaches to cancer treatment

This review discusses a unique discovery path starting with novel findings on redox regulation of precursor cell and signaling pathway function and identification of a new mechanism by which relatively small changes in redox status can control entire signaling networks that regulate self-renewal, differentiation, and survival. The pathway central to this work, the redox/Fyn/c-Cbl (RFC) pathway, converts small increases in oxidative status to pan-activation of the c-Cbl ubiquitin ligase, which controls multiple receptors and other proteins of central importance in precursor cell and cancer cell function. Integration of work on the RFC pathway with attempts to understand how treatment with systemic chemotherapy causes neurological problems led to the discovery that glioblastomas (GBMs) and basal-like breast cancers (BLBCs) inhibit c-Cbl function through altered utilization of the cytoskeletal regulators Cool-1/βpix and Cdc42, respectively. Inhibition of these proteins to restore normal c-Cbl function suppresses cancer cell division, increases sensitivity to chemotherapy, disrupts tumor-initiating cell (TIC) activity in GBMs and BLBCs, controls multiple critical TIC regulators, and also allows targeting of non-TICs. Moreover, these manipulations do not increase chemosensitivity or suppress division of nontransformed cells. Restoration of normal c-Cbl function also allows more effective harnessing of estrogen receptor-α (ERα)-independent activities of tamoxifen to activate the RFC pathway and target ERα-negative cancer cells. Our work thus provides a discovery strategy that reveals mechanisms and therapeutic targets that cannot be deduced by standard genetics analyses, which fail to reveal the metabolic information, isoform shifts, protein activation, protein complexes, and protein degradation critical to our discoveries.

Cognitive impact of cytotoxic agents in mice

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with changes in cognition in a subgroup of cancer patients. Chemotherapy is generally given as a combination of cytotoxic agents, which makes it hard to define the agent responsible for these observed changes. Literature on animal experiments has been difficult to interpret due to variance in experimental setup.

METHODS

We examined the effects of cytotoxic agents administered separately on various cognitive measures in a standardized animal model. Male C57Bl/6 mice received cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate, or topotecan. These agents represent different compound classes based on their working mechanism and are frequently prescribed in the clinic. A control group received saline. Behavioral testing started 2 or 15 weeks after treatment and included testing general measures of behavior and cognitive task performance: spontaneous behavior in an automated home cage, open field, novel location recognition (NLR), novel object recognition (NOR), Barnes maze, contextual fear conditioning, and a simple choice reaction time task (SCRTT).

RESULTS

Cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, and doxorubicin administration affected spontaneous activity in the automated home cage. All cytotoxic agents affected memory (NLR and/or NOR). Spatial memory measured in the Barnes maze was affected after administration with doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, and topotecan. Decreased inhibition in the SCRTT was observed after treatment with cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, and topotecan.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that, in mice, a single treatment with a cytotoxic agent causes cognitive impairment. Not all cytotoxic agents affected the same cognitive domains, which might be explained by differences in working mechanisms of the various agents.

Chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current animal studies and future directions

Cognitive impairment is a potential long-term side effect of adjuvant chemotherapy that can have a major impact on the quality of life of cancer survivors. There is a growing number of preclinical studies addressing this issue, thereby extending our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. In this review, we will summarize the recent advances and important findings presented in these studies. Emerging challenges, such as the development of neuroprotective strategies, and the role of the blood-brain barrier on cognitive impairment will be described and future directions in this field of investigation will be outlined.

Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancer-related cognitive impairment

This review summarizes the current literature on cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) with a focus on prevalence, mechanisms, and possible interventions for CRCI in those who receive adjuvant chemotherapy for non-central nervous system tumours and is primarily focused on breast cancer. CRCI is characterized as deficits in areas of cognition including memory, attention, concentration, and executive function. Development of CRCI can impair quality of life and impact treatment decisions. CRCI is highly prevalent; these problems can be detected in up to 30% of patients prior to chemotherapy, up to 75% of patients report some form of CRCI during treatment, and CRCI is still present in up to 35% of patients many years following completion of treatment. While the trajectory of CRCI is becoming better understood, the mechanisms underlying the development of CRCI are still obscure; however, host characteristics, immune dysfunction, neural toxicity, and genetics may play key roles in the development and trajectory of CRCI. Intervention research is limited, though strategies to maintain function are being studied with promising preliminary findings. This review highlights key research being conducted in these areas, both in patient populations and in animals, which will ultimately result in better understanding and effective treatments for CRCI.

Cognitive effects of cancer and its treatments at the intersection of aging: what do we know; what do we need to know?

There is a fairly consistent, albeit non-universal body of research documenting cognitive declines after cancer and its treatments. While few of these studies have included subjects aged 65 years and older, it is logical to expect that older patients are at risk of cognitive decline. Here, we use breast cancer as an exemplar disease for inquiry into the intersection of aging and cognitive effects of cancer and its therapies. There are a striking number of common underlying potential biological risks and pathways for the development of cancer, cancer-related cognitive declines, and aging processes, including the development of a frail phenotype. Candidate shared pathways include changes in hormonal milieu, inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage and compromised DNA repair, genetic susceptibility, decreased brain blood flow or disruption of the blood-brain barrier, direct neurotoxicity, decreased telomere length, and cell senescence. There also are similar structure and functional changes seen in brain imaging studies of cancer patients and those seen with "normal" aging and Alzheimer's disease. Disentangling the role of these overlapping processes is difficult since they require aged animal models and large samples of older human subjects. From what we do know, frailty and its low cognitive reserve seem to be a clinically useful marker of risk for cognitive decline after cancer and its treatments. This and other results from this review suggest the value of geriatric assessments to identify older patients at the highest risk of cognitive decline. Further research is needed to understand the interactions between aging, genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and frailty phenotypes to best identify the subgroups of older patients at greatest risk for decline and to develop behavioral and pharmacological interventions targeting this group. We recommend that basic science and population trials be developed specifically for older hosts with intermediate endpoints of relevance to this group, including cognitive function and trajectories of frailty. Clinicians and their older patients can advance the field by active encouragement of and participation in research designed to improve the care and outcomes of the growing population of older cancer patients.

Neuroprotective and procognitive effects of sertraline: in vitro and in vivo studies

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) stimulate synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis, most likely via the MAP-kinase signal transduction pathway (by phosphorilation of ERK) and by stimulating neurotrophic factors such as brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and the neuroprotective protein (Bcl-2). Using human neuroblastoma cells (SHSY5Y), we found that sertraline and its derivative, desmethylsertraline, at low concentrations (1-10 μM), induced potent neurotrophic activity. Subsequently, we have treated for 21 days young and aged mice with sertraline. Sertraline in certain doses improved significantly spatial memory learning, in both young and old mice. Sertraline treatment resulted in up-regulation of brain BDNF, phospho-ERK and Bcl-2 that may be involved in the pro-cognitive effect of sertraline.

Cognitive impairments and cancer chemotherapy: translational research at a crossroads

Cancer chemotherapy is often associated with cognitive deficits which may remain after the treatment has ended. As more people survive cancer, concern is increasing about the impact of these problems with memory and executive function when they return to everyday life. When chemotherapeutic drugs are administered to healthy animals in dosing regimens modeling those used in humans, cognitive deficits also occur, and these preclinical studies can provide information about the biological mechanisms by which the cancer fighting drugs affect the brain. Evidence from animal studies points to damage to hippocampus, particularly a disruption of neurogenesis, whereas human studies emphasize cognitive deficits associated with impairments in frontal cortical function. This discrepancy may be due more to the tasks selected by researchers, and the choice of biochemical endpoints than inherently different effects of chemotherapy in humans and rodents. These differences in approach must be reconciled if common underlying mechanisms are to be identified, with the hope of leading to novel drug or non-pharmacological treatments. This may be achieved by broadening the scope of human and animal studies, and by looking outside the topic of chemotherapy-induced cancer deficits to learn from the advances being made by studying the effects of stress and somatic disease on brain function, and the cognitive impairments now recognized to result from a wide range of mental and physical illnesses.

The effect of systemic chemotherapy on neurogenesis, plasticity and memory

Chemotherapy has been enormously successful in treating many forms of cancer and improving patient survival rates. With the increasing numbers of survivors, a number of cognitive side effects have become apparent. These have been called "chemobrain" or "chemofog" among patient groups, who describe the symptoms as a decline in memory, concentration and executive functions. Changes which, although subtle, can cause significant distress among patients and prevent a return to the quality of life experienced before treatment. This cognitive side effect of chemotherapy was not anticipated as it had been assumed that chemotherapy agents, administered systematically, could not cross the blood-brain barrier and that the brain was therefore protected from their action. It is now realised that low concentrations of many chemotherapy agents cross the blood-brain barrier and even those that are completely prevented from doing so, can induce the production of inflammatory cytokines in peripheral tissues which in turn can cross the blood-brain barrier and impact on the brain. A large number of patient studies have shown that cognitive decline is found in a proportion of patients treated with a variety of chemotherapy agents for different types of cancer. The deficits experienced by these patients can last for up to several years and have a deleterious effect on educational attainment and ability to return to work. Imaging studies of patients after systemic chemotherapy show that this treatment produces structural and functional changes in the brain some of which seem to persist even when the cognitive deficits have ceased. This suggests that, with time, brain plasticity may be able to compensate for the deleterious effects of chemotherapy treatment. A number of mechanisms have been suggested for the changes in brain structure and function found after chemotherapy. These include both central and peripheral inflammatory changes, demyelination of white matter tracts, a reduction in stem cell proliferation in both the hippocampal neurogenic region and by oligodendrocyte precursors as well as changes in hormonal or growth factor levels. A number of possible treatments have been suggested which range from pharmacological interventions to cognitive behavioural therapies. Some of these have only been tested in animal models while others have produced varying degrees of improvement in patient populations. Currently, there is no recognised treatment and a greater understanding of the causes of the cognitive decline experienced after chemotherapy will be key to finding ways of preventing or treating the effects of chemobrain.

Brain vulnerability to chemotherapy toxicities

Chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes have been an increasing concern among cancer survivors. By using adjuvant treatment for breast cancer as the prototype, this manuscript reviews research from neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, and animal model studies that have examined the clinical presentation and potential mechanisms for cognitive changes associated with exposure to chemotherapy. An impressive body of research supports the hypothesis that a subgroup of patients is vulnerable to post-treatment cognitive changes, although not exclusively related to chemotherapy. Further, imaging and animal model studies provide accumulating evidence of putative mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive change. Models of aging are also reviewed in support of the proposal that cognitive changes associated with cancer and cancer treatments can be viewed in the context of factors that affect the trajectory of normal aging.

Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: an update on the state of the science

Cognitive changes associated with cancer and cancer treatments have become an increasing concern. Using breast cancer as the prototype, we reviewed the research from neuropsychological, imaging, genetic, and animal studies that have examined pre- and post-treatment cognitive change. An impressive body of research supports the contention that a subgroup of patients is vulnerable to post-treatment cognitive problems. We also propose that models of aging may be a useful conceptual framework for guiding research in this area and suggest that a useful perspective may be viewing cognitive change in patients with cancer within the context of factors that influence the trajectory of normal aging.

Chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction

Many cancer patients develop treatment-related cognitive dysfunction that affects their quality of life and can result in diminished functional independence. There is an emerging body of transdisciplinary research demonstrating that chemotherapeutic agents can produce neurobiological changes within the brain, which are associated with a constellation of cognitive changes that can result in decreased quality of life and functional independence. The increased incidence of cancer, coupled with longer survival times, has resulted in larger numbers of cancer survivors who are struggling with this neurotoxicity. This review summarizes the neuropsychological findings in patients with breast and brain cancer who receive systemic chemotherapy as well as the recent animal and imaging research elucidating the mechanisms by which these therapies impact brain structure, function, and consequent behavior.