Specificity of B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Assays: Cross-Reactivity with Different BNP, NT-proBNP, and proBNP Peptides

NT-proBNP: When is it useful in Obstetric Medicine?

Pregnancy, viewed as a stress test of the haemodynamic system, may unmask underlying cardiac disease. Pregnancy may also induce de novo cardiac disease. N-terminal pro brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a useful biomarker in all clinical conditions in which the ventricle is stressed and especially stretched in the general population. In hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, increased levels of NT-proBNP in preeclampsia are associated with increased cardiac filling pressures and diastolic dysfunction. Increased levels of NT-proBNP in pregnant women with known cardiac disease may lead to earlier diagnosis of impending heart failure. Similarly, elevated levels of NT-proBNP assist with the diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy and are increasingly used in follow-up. Women with known congenital heart disease who are pregnant can be screened for risk of cardiac events such as heart failure by the use of NT-proBNP levels. There is a paucity of data in pregnancy with the use of NT-proBNP and more research is needed.

Development of a BNP1-32 Immunoassay That Does Not Cross-React with proBNP

BACKGROUND

Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration reflects cardiac dysfunction and assists in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure (HF). Current BNP assays overestimate circulating bioactive BNP1-32 concentrations as they also detect less active BNP metabolites and proBNP. A specific BNP1-32 assay with negligible cross-reactivity to proBNP and/or BNP metabolites may be advantageous.

METHODS

We developed a Luminex-based specific BNP1-32 immunoassay and compared results obtained from 3 other BNP assays (a Luminex-based total-BNP assay, our BNP RIA, and the commercially available Abbott Architect BNP assay) in plasma from 42 patients with HF and 22 healthy controls.

RESULTS

The BNP1-32 assay showed 57% cross-reactivity with BNP2-32, but ≤0.1% cross-reactivity to BNP3-32, other BNP metabolites, and proBNP; its detection limit was 0.35 ng/L; and intra- and interassay CVs were <15%. BNP immunoreactivity increased with HF severity (median concentrations being 0.3, 0.8, 26.2, and 17.3 ng/L in healthy controls and 40.7, 139, 465, and 1778 ng/L in HF patients for the BNP1-32, total-BNP, BNP RIA, and Abbott BNP assays respectively). The fold increase between HF cases with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV was significantly greater with the BNP1-32 assay than the Abbott BNP (P = 0.026) and the BNP RIA (P < 0.0001) but not the total-BNP assay.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed the first assay that measures BNP1-32 in plasma without interference by proBNP. Analysis of larger patient cohorts is now required to compare the performance of this assay with current less specific assays for the diagnosis or prognosis of HF.