Recovery and limitation of exercise capacity after lung resection for lung cancer

Endurance and Resistance Training in Radically Treated Respiratory Cancer patients: A Pilot Study

Introduction. Respiratory cancer and its treatment are known to contribute to muscle weakness and functional impairment. Aim. To assess the effects of rehabilitation in patients with respiratory cancer. Methods. Radically treated respiratory cancer patients were included in a 12-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Results. 16 patients (age: 61 ± 7 years; FEV₁: 57 ± 16% pred.) showed a reduced exercise tolerance (VO₂max: 56 ± 15% pred.; 6 MWD: 67 ± 11% pred.), muscle force (PImax: 54 ± 22% pred.; QF: 67 ± 16% pred.), and quality of life (CRDQd: 17 ± 5 points; CRDQf: 16 ± 5 points). Exercise tolerance, muscle force, and quality of life improved significantly after rehabilitation. Conclusion. Radically treated patients with respiratory cancer have a decreased exercise capacity, muscle force, and quality of life. 12 weeks of rehabilitation leads to a significant improvement in exercise capacity, respiratory muscle force, and quality of life.

Simple laboratory parameters which can determine the clinical state of patients after pneumonectomy for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The clinical state of patients after pneumonectomy varies from normal to seriously impaired daily life. The objective of the study is to identify laboratory parameters which determine the clinical postpneumonectomy state.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients who underwent pneumonectomy for lung carcinoma (mean age: 61.5 +/- 7.2 years, left sided: 23) were prospectively studied with preoperative and 6-month postoperative spirometry, Doppler echocardiography for calculation of right ventricular systolic pressure and arterial blood gas. The clinical postpneumonectomy state was defined as the class of dyspnea on exertion: I = on heavy exertion, II = on moderate exertion, III = on mild exertion, IV = on minimal exertion.

RESULTS

Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and percent of the predicted FVC were significantly lower in patients with class III and IV than in patients with class I and II dyspnea, while right ventricular systolic pressure and percent reduction of FVC and FEV1 were significantly higher in patients with class IV dyspnea. On multiple regression analysis, postoperative FEV1 and percent reduction of FVC were found to strongly affect the postpneumonectomy state. Right pneumonectomy, obstructive pattern at preoperative spirometry, bronchial obstruction limited to up to three bronchopulmonary segments at preoperative bronchoscopy and predicted FEV1 less than 1.4 liter by the ventilation/perfusion lung scanning were connected with seriously impaired postpneumonectomy state.

CONCLUSIONS

The postpneumonectomy state is affected by low actual postpneumonectomy FEV1 values and serious percent reduction of FVC from preoperative values. Right pneumonectomy together with obstructive ventilatory pattern and minimal bronchial obstruction are preoperative factors that result in serious reduction of FEV1 and percent reduction of FVC.

Safety and feasibility of aerobic training on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life in postsurgical nonsmall cell lung cancer patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

A feasibility study examining the effects of supervised aerobic exercise training on cardiopulmonary and quality of life (QOL) endpoints among postsurgical nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was conducted.

METHODS

Using a single-group design, 20 patients with stage I-IIIB NSCLC performed 3 aerobic cycle ergometry sessions per week at 60% to 100% of peak workload for 14 weeks. Peak oxygen consumption (VO(2peak)) was assessed using an incremental exercise test. QOL and fatigue were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients completed the study. Intention-to-treat analysis indicated that VO(2peak) increased 1.1 mL/kg(-1)/min(-1) (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3-2.5; P = .109) and peak workload increased 9 W (95% CI, 3-14; P = .003), whereas FACT-L increased 10 points (95% CI, -1-22; P = .071) and fatigue decreased 7 points (95% CI; -1 to -17; P = .029) from baseline to postintervention. Per protocol analyses indicated greater improvements in cardiopulmonary and QOL endpoints among patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study provided proof of principle that supervised aerobic training is safe and feasible for postsurgical NSCLC patients. Aerobic exercise training is also associated with significant improvements in QOL and select cardiopulmonary endpoints, particularly among patients not receiving chemotherapy. Larger randomized trials are warranted.

Predicting the need for intensive care following lung resection

On the basis of the evidence available, the authors would suggest a decision making algorithm to determine the need for ICU admission postoperatively similar to that shown in Fig. 1. First, patients should quit smoking at least 1 month and preferably 2 months before surgery. Those over the age of 70 years should receive elective ICU admission. Second, those at increased risk of general anesthesia, as judged by ASA and performance status scores and cardiovascular risk assessment, should be prebooked into the ICU in the postoperative period. A ppo FEV1 of less than 44% should warrant additional monitoring rather than mandate ICU admission. Pre-existing fibrotic lung disease mandates ICU admission. Third, perioperatively, protective (low tidal volume) ventilatory strategies should be applied during one lung ventilation. Patients undergoing one lung ventilation, and especially those undergoing extensive lymphatic dissection, should be monitored closely for signs of ALI in the first 5 days postoperatively. This, together with any indication of postoperative complications such as POP, BPF or empyema, should mandate immediate transfer to the ICU.

Long-term recovery of exercise capacity and pulmonary function after lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to perform longitudinal objective evaluations of recovery of exercise capacity based on expired gas analysis during exercise testing up to 1 year after pulmonary resection.

METHODS

The study included 18 patients who underwent lobectomy. Expired gas analysis during exercise testing was conducted 1 week before surgery and 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. The parameters studied included maximum exercise capacity based on expired gas analysis during exercise testing (maximum oxygen uptake per minute per square meter of body surface area) and assessment of moderate exercise capacity (anaerobic threshold per square meter of body surface area). The changes in postoperative data relative to the preoperative values (baseline) were assessed, including the percent changes from baseline data, which were arbitrarily given a value of 100.

RESULTS

Maximum oxygen uptake per minute per square meter of body surface area decreased significantly to 78.6% +/- 14.2% of the baseline value at 2 weeks after surgery and was 80.3% +/- 12.7%, 90.9% +/- 15.9%, 90% +/- 19.7%, and 97% +/- 4.8% of the baseline value at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Anaerobic threshold per square meter of body surface area reached 91.1% +/- 17.5% of the baseline value even 2 weeks after surgery and was 87.1% +/- 17.3%, 97.5% +/- 28.0%, 84.3% +/- 13.2%, and 104% +/- 16.2% of the baseline value at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The extent of recovery of exercise capacity at 1 year after surgery was approximately 95%. Furthermore, the anaerobic threshold per square meter of body surface area was restored to the preoperative level by 1 year after surgery.

Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

This section of the guidelines is intended to provide an evidence-based approach to the preoperative physiologic assessment of a patient being considered for surgical resection of lung cancer.

METHODS

Current guidelines and medical literature applicable to this issue were identified by computerized search and evaluated using standardized methods. Recommendations were framed using the approach described by the Health and Science Policy Committee.

RESULTS

The preoperative physiologic assessment should begin with a cardiovascular evaluation and spirometry to measure the FEV(1). If diffuse parenchymal lung disease is evident on radiographic studies or if there is dyspnea on exertion that is clinically out of proportion to the FEV(1), the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco) should also be measured. In patients with either an FEV(1) or Dlco < 80% predicted, the likely postoperative pulmonary reserve should be estimated by either the perfusion scan method for pneumonectomy or the anatomic method, based on counting the number of segments to be removed, for lobectomy. An estimated postoperative FEV(1) or Dlco < 40% predicted indicates an increased risk for perioperative complications, including death, from a standard lung cancer resection (lobectomy or greater removal of lung tissue). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to measure maximal oxygen consumption (Vo(2)max) should be performed to further define the perioperative risk of surgery; a Vo(2)max of < 15 mL/kg/min indicates an increased risk of perioperative complications. Alternative types of exercise testing, such as stair climbing, the shuttle walk, and the 6-min walk, should be considered if CPET is not available. Although often not performed in a standardized manner, patients who cannot climb one flight of stairs are expected to have a Vo(2)max of < 10 mL/kg/min. Data on the shuttle walk and 6-min walk are limited, but patients who cannot complete 25 shuttles on two occasions will likely have a Vo(2)max of < 10 mL/kg/min. Desaturation during an exercise test has not clearly been associated with an increased risk for perioperative complications. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves survival in selected patients with severe emphysema. Accumulating experience suggests that patients with extremely poor lung function who are deemed inoperable by conventional criteria might tolerate combined LVRS and curative-intent resection of lung cancer with an acceptable mortality rate and good postoperative outcomes. Combining LVRS and lung cancer resection should be considered in patients with a cancer in an area of upper lobe emphysema, an FEV(1) of > 20% predicted, and a Dlco of > 20% predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

A careful preoperative physiologic assessment will be useful to identify those patients who are at increased risk with standard lung cancer resection and to enable an informed decision by the patient about the appropriate therapeutic approach to treating their lung cancer. This preoperative risk assessment must be placed in the context that surgery for early-stage lung cancer is the most effective currently available treatment for this disease.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative intent therapy: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guideline (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

To develop an evidence-based approach to follow-up of patients after curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

METHODS

Guidelines on lung cancer diagnosis and management published between 2002 and December 2005 were identified by a systematic review of the literature, and supplemental material appropriate to this topic was obtained by literature search of a computerized database (Medline) and review of the reference lists of relevant articles.

RESULTS

Adequate follow-up by the specialist responsible for the curative intent therapy should be ensured to manage complications related to the curative intent therapy and should last at least 3 to 6 months. In addition, a surveillance program should be considered to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. A standard surveillance program for these patients, coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer, is recommended based on periodic visits with chest imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Smoking cessation and, if indicated, facilitation in participation in special programs is recommended for all patients following curative intent therapy for lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence favors follow-up of complications related to curative intent therapy, and a surveillance program at regular intervals with imaging and review of symptoms. Smoking cessation after curative intent therapy to prevent recurrence of lung cancer is strongly supported by the available evidence.

Surgical treatment of patients with lung cancer and limited lung function: Preoperative assessment, operative mortality and morbidity

Introduction: Lung resection in patients with limited lung function is one of the greatest challenges in general thoracic surgery. Objective. The aim of the study was to analyze the pattern of lung function changes after operation, operative morbidity and mortality and to compare them with control group of patients. Method. The study included 34 patients with limited lung function, operated for primary lung cancer in one-year period. All patients underwent preoperative desobstructive treatment. The type of ventilatory disorder was analyzed depending on preoperative radiographic and bronchoscopic aspect. Statistics: chisquare test, t-test. Results. In patients with lobectomy, the mean difference in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) between preoperative and postoperative values was 16.81%, whilst in the pneumonectomy group this difference was 39.51%. The mean change in forced vital capacity (FVC) in the lobectomy and pneumonectomy group was 15.83% and 42.73% respectively. In the control group of 28 patients with lobectomy, the decrease in FVC and FEV1 was 19.9% and 24.18% respectively. In the control group of 28 patients with pneumonectomy, the decrease in FVC and FEV1 was 43.52% and 41.36% respectively. In patients with limited lung function and lobectomy, changes in FEV1 and VC after resection were significantly lower compared to the control group of patients with lobectomy and normal lung function. None of 34 operated patients with borderline lung function died inside 30 postoperative days. In the same period, of a total number of 344 patients without respiratory function impairment, operative mortality was 3.1%. In the analyzed group, operative morbidity was 32.35%. Cardiovascular and respiratory complications in the analyzed and control groups occurred in 14.7% and 6.1% of patients respectively (p>0.05). Conclusion. Surgery should not be excluded in patients with borderline lung function prior to preoperative treatment and additional lung function assessment. .

Evaluation of Expiratory Volume, Diffusion Capacity, and Exercise Tolerance Following Major Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

Lung resections determine a variable functional reduction depending on the extent of the resection and the time elapsed from the operation. The objectives of this study were to prospectively investigate the postoperative changes in FEV(1), carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (Dlco), and exercise tolerance after major lung resection at repeated evaluation times.

METHODS

FEV(1), Dlco, and peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2)peak) calculated using the stair climbing test were measured in 200 patients preoperatively, at discharge, and 1 month and 3 months after lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Preoperative and repeated postoperative measures were compared, and a time-series, cross-sectional regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative Vo(2)peak.

RESULTS

One month after lobectomy, FEV(1), Dlco, and Vo(2)peak values were 79.5%, 81.5%, and 96% of preoperative values and recovered up to 84%, 88.5%, and 97% after 3 months, respectively. One month after pneumonectomy, FEV(1) percentage of predicted, Dlco percentage of predicted, and Vo(2)peak values were 65%, 75%, and 87% of preoperative values, and were 66%, 80%, and 89% after 3 months, respectively. Three months after lobectomy, 27% of patients with COPD had improved FEV(1), 34% had improved Dlco, and 43% had improved Vo(2)peak compared to preoperative values. The time-series, cross-sectional regression analysis showed that postoperative Vo(2)peak values were directly associated with preoperative values of Vo(2)peak, and postoperative values of FEV(1) and Dlco, and were inversely associated with age and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may be used during preoperative counseling and for deciding eligibility for operation along with other more traditional measures of outcome.

Reliability of quantitative computed tomography to predict postoperative lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease having a lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

To verify the reliability of quantitative computed tomography (CT) to estimate the postoperative lung function in patients with mild to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent a lobectomy.

METHODS

Nine COPD patients with lung cancer having a lung lobectomy with preoperative CT were enrolled. By applying a density mask technique and a specific equation, predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and vital capacity (VC) were calculated. Predicted values were correlated with postoperative measured values.

RESULTS

Estimated FEV1 and VC were always significantly lower than the corresponding postoperative values; however, CT-estimated postresection FEV1 values were better than the postresection VC values (biases between estimated and measured values were -0.14 and -0.536 L, respectively, according to the Bland-Altman method). Quantitative CT predicted postoperative FEV1 (r = 0.97, P < 0.001) and VC (r = 0.93, P < 0.001) well in all patients, however.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative CT may be an alternative tool to perfusion scan to predict postresection lung function, even in patients with borderline pulmonary function undergoing a lobectomy.

Advanced age does not exclude lobectomy for non-small cell lung carcinoma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Localized non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is best treated by complete surgical resection, commonly requiring lobectomy. The impact of lobectomy on the health status of the elderly patient is not well-characterized. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of lobectomy in elderly patients (> or = 70 years of age) and younger patients (< 70 years of age) on their pulmonary function and functional status 1 year following surgery.

DESIGN

One hundred forty patients underwent lobectomy for NSCLC at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center from January 1999 to December 2003. All patients underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and functional status assessment using Karnofsky scores (KS) that were assessed preoperatively. Sixty-three of 140 lobectomy patients were available 1 year postoperatively for reevaluation by PFTs and KS.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between groups in either the pulmonary function or functional status testing results at 1 year after undergoing lobectomy. FVC decreased by 14% in the elderly patient and by 9% in the younger patient group. FEV1 decreased by 19% in elderly patients and by 13% in younger patients. Functional status declined for two older patients (8%), who dropped their KS from 80 to 100% (normal activity without limitation) to 40 to 70% (unable to work, but able to care of self at home). Nine of the younger patients (24%) had KS drop from 80 to 100% to 40 to 70%. There was one perioperative death (30-day mortality rate for the study groups, 1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients > or = 70 years of age undergoing lobectomy for NSCLC had similar PFT results and functional status as younger patients < 70 years of age 1 year after undergoing surgery. Curative resection should not be denied based on age alone.

The impact of pre-radiotherapy surgery on radiation-induced lung injury

AIMS

The use of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is predicated by an assessment of the potential benefits and risks, including radiation-induced lung injury. In this study, the risk of radiation-induced lung injury is assessed in patients who received PORT, and compared with a group of patients who received radiation without prior surgery, to determine if surgery increases the risk of radiation pneumonitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 2003, 251 patients with lung cancer were enrolled into a prospective study to assess radiation-induced lung injury. All patients received three-dimensional-planned, external-beam radiotherapy. One hundred and seventy-seven patients with over 6-months follow-up were eligible. For the current analysis, 49 patients (28%) had surgical intervention before radiotherapy. The rates of Grade 2 symptomatic pneumonitis in subgroups, based on the type of pre-radiation surgery, were computed and compared using Fisher's Exact Test. To consider the confounding factor of irradiated lung volume, patient subgroups were further defined on the basis of the mean lung dose.

RESULTS

Surgical procedures included pneumonectomy (n=9), lobectomy (n=16), wedge resection (n=8) and exploration without resection (n=16). Radiation-induced lung injury occurred in 33 out of 177 (19%) patients, including 18% of the surgical group and 19% of the non-surgical group. Additionally, no statistically significant difference was found in the rate of radiation-induced lung injury based on the extent of resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of pneumonitis is similar in the surgical and non-surgical groups. Thus, PORT may be safely given to selected patients after surgical exploration or resection.

Lung cancer: Preoperative pulmonary evaluation of the lung resection candidate

Lung resection provides the best chance of cure for individuals with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Naturally, lung resection will lead to a decrease in lung function. The population that develops lung cancer often has concomitant lung disease and a reduced ability to tolerate further losses in lung function. The goal of the preoperative pulmonary assessment of individuals with resectable lung cancer is to identify those individuals whose short- and long-term morbidity and mortality would be unacceptably high if surgical resection were to occur. Pulmonary function measures such as the forced expiratory volume in 1 second and the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide are useful predictors of postoperative outcome. In situations in which lung function is not normal, the prediction of postoperative lung function from preoperative results and the assessment of exercise capacity can be performed to further clarify risks. Published guidelines help to direct the order of testing, permitting us to offer resection to as many patients as possible.

Risk acceptance and risk aversion: patients' perspectives on lung surgery

Patients express risk aversion toward surgery, particularly if surgery can lead to lifelong debility and loss of independence. When faced with a guarantee of progressive lung cancer and no alternatives for cure, however, patients are willing to take extremely high risks of postoperative complications and surgery-related death. This result occurs because risk aversion toward unrelenting cancer death supersedes patients' risk attitudes toward almost all other health states. By adding conditions such as misunderstanding of prognosis, diagnostic uncertainty, a patient's denial of diagnosis, an actual alternative cure such as radiation therapy, or a perceived alternative cure such as prayer, decisions can be shifted so that risk aversion to surgery can predominate. In practical terms, the following statements can be made: 1. For patients who surely have operable stage I or stage II non small cell lung cancer, if patient risk preferences are taken seriously, the pulmonary function level and comorbidities that are acceptable for the offer of surgical care probably need to be liberalized. Patients with short life expectancies because of advanced age or comorbid illness and patients with severe preoperative functional debility (eg, bed-to-chair limitation as defined earlier) should not be candidates, however. 2. The diagnosis of cancer needs to be confirmed absolutely as often as possible before lung resection surgery. 3. Physicians or a staff member must communicate prognosis to a patient as precisely and numerically as possible and ensure the patient's understanding of the data presented. 4. This communicator also must explore a patient's trust in the diagnosis and probe for beliefs in alternative solutions. Important areas for future study include the search for methods that most accurately communicate risk information to patients, especially patients with low numeracy skills. Part of this communication effort should involve the exploration and discussion of patients' alternative beliefs and ways of using these belief systems to help them make the best possible decisions for their long-term health and quality of life. Also, clinicians must identify pulmonary and other predictors of mortality rates and the debility states that patients' cite as most important according to their risk preferences and give up the predictors of transient postoperative complications that patients find acceptable.

Acute and chronic reduction of pulmonary function after lung surgery

Pulmonary function is affected by several variables. The more marginal the patient, the more important the preoperative and perioperative assessment becomes. VATS might be tolerated well with regard to pulmonary function in the early postoperative period. It has allowed thoracic surgeons to expand surgical indications to patients that previously would not have been considered.

Minimal alteration of pulmonary function after lobectomy in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) on postoperative pulmonary function and to elucidate the factors for decreasing the reduction of pulmonary function after lobectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 521 patients who had undergone lobectomy for lung cancer at Chiba University Hospital between 1990 and 2000. Forty-eight patients were categorized as COPD, defined as percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) less than or equal to 70% and percentage of FEV1 to forced vital capacity less than or equal to 70%. The remaining 473 patients were categorized as non-COPD.

RESULTS

Although all preoperative pulmonary function test data and arterial oxygen tension were significantly lower in the COPD group, postoperative arterial oxygen tension and FEV1 were equivalent between the two groups, and the ratio of actual postoperative to predicted postoperative FEV1 was significantly better in the COPD group (p < 0.001). With multivariable analysis, COPD and pulmonary resection of the lower portion of the lung (lower or middle-lower lobectomies) were identified as independent factors for the minimal deterioration of FEV1. Actual postoperative FEV1 was 15% lower and higher than predicted, respectively, in the non-COPD patients with upper portion lobectomy and the COPD patients with lower portion lobectomy. Finally, we created a new equation for predicting postoperative FEV1, and it produced a higher coefficient of determination (R(2)) than the conventional one.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative ventilatory function in patients with COPD who had lower or middle-lower lobectomies was better preserved than predicted.

Follow-up and surveillance of the lung cancer patient following curative-intent therapy

The following two distinctly different issues should be taken into account when planning patient care following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer: adequate follow-up to manage complications related to the curative-intent therapy; and surveillance to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. Follow-up for complications should be performed by the specialist responsible for the curative-intent therapy and should last 3 to 6 months. Recurrences of the original lung cancer will be more likely during the first 2 years after curative-intent therapy, but there will be an increased lifelong risk of approximately 1 to 2% per year of developing a metachronous, or new primary, lung cancer. A standard surveillance program for these patients is recommended based on periodic visits, with chest-imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Whether subgroups of patients with a higher risk of developing a metachronous lung cancer (eg, those patients whose primary lung cancer was radiographically occult or central and those patients surviving for > 2 years after treatment for small cell lung cancer) should have a more intensive surveillance program is presently unclear. The surveillance program should be coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer. Smoking cessation is recommended for all patients following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer.

The physiologic evaluation of patients with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery

The preoperative physiologic assessment of a patient being considered for surgical resection of lung cancer must consider the immediate perioperative risks from comorbid cardiopulmonary disease, the long-term risks of pulmonary disability, and the threat to survival due to inadequately treated lung cancer. As with any planned major operation, especially in a population predisposed to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease by cigarette smoking, a cardiovascular evaluation is an important component in assessing perioperative risks. Measuring the FEV(1) and the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) measurements should be viewed as complementary physiologic tests for assessing risk related to pulmonary function. If there is evidence of interstitial lung disease on radiographic studies or undue dyspnea on exertion, even though the FEV(1) may be adequate, a DLCO should be obtained. In patients with abnormalities in FEV(1) or DLCO identified preoperatively, it is essential to estimate the likely postresection pulmonary reserve. The amount of lung function lost in lung cancer resection can be estimated by using either a perfusion scan or the number of segments removed. A predicted postoperative FEV(1) or DLCO < 40% indicates an increased risk for perioperative complications, including death, from lung cancer resection. Exercise testing should be performed in these patients to further define the perioperative risks prior to surgery. Formal cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a sophisticated physiologic testing technique that includes recording the exercise ECG, heart rate response to exercise, minute ventilation, and oxygen uptake per minute, and allows calculation of maximal oxygen consumption (.VO(2)max). Risk for perioperative complications can generally be stratified by .VO(2)max. Patients with preoperative .VO(2)max > 20 mL/kg/min are not at increased risk of complications or death; .VO(2)max< 15 mL/kg/min indicates an increased risk of perioperative complications; and patients with .VO(2)max < 10 mL/kg/min have a very high risk for postoperative complications. Alternative types of exercise testing include stair climbing, the shuttle walk, and the 6-min walk. Although often not performed in a standardized manner, stair climbing can predict .VO(2)max. In general terms, patients who can climb five flights of stairs have O(2)max > 20 mL/kg/min. Conversely, patients who cannot climb one flight of stairs have .VO(2)max < 10 mL/kg/min. Data on the shuttle walk and 6-min walk are limited, but patients who cannot complete 25 shuttles on two occasions will have .VO(2)max < 10 mL/kg/min. Desaturation during an exercise test has been associated with an increased risk for perioperative complications. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for patients with severe emphysema is a controversial procedure. Some reports document substantial improvements in lung function, exercise capability, and quality of life in highly selected patients with emphysema following LVRS. Case series of patients referred for LVRS indicate that perhaps 3 to 6% of these patients may have coexisting lung cancer. Anecdotal experience from these case series suggest that patients with extremely poor lung function can tolerate combined LVRS and resection of the lung cancer with an acceptable mortality rate and good postoperative outcomes. Combining LVRS and lung cancer resection should probably be limited to those patients with heterogeneous emphysema, particularly emphysema limited to the lobe containing the tumor.

Stair-climbing test to evaluate maximum aerobic capacity early after lung resection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of reduction in maximum oxygen consumption in the early postoperative period after lung resection for lung carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 115 patients who underwent lung resection (95 lobectomies, 20 pneumonectomies) performed a maximal stair-climbing test the day before operation and the day of discharge from the hospital (8 +/- 3.3 days after the operation).

RESULTS

The postoperative test showed a 15% reduction in maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) with respect to the preoperative test (Student's t test, p < 0.0001). This reduction was greater after pneumonectomy (21.4%) than after lobectomy (14%) (Student's t test, p < 0.05). A multiple regression analysis showed that the only significant independent predictors of both preoperative and postoperative VO2max were the age of the patient and the level of arterial oxygen content.

CONCLUSIONS

The early postoperative reduction in VO2max was greater after pneumonectomy than after lobectomy and the exercise performance was significantly influenced by the level of arterial oxygen content both before and early after the operation.

Exercise capacity of thoracotomy patients in the early postoperative period

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the mechanism involved with the initial drop and subsequent recovery of exercise capacity in the early postoperative period of thoracotomy patients.

METHODS

Sixteen patients (13 who had undergone lobectomy, 3 who had undergone pneumonectomy) underwent a routine pulmonary function test (PFT) and a cardiopulmonary exercise test preoperatively, within 14 postoperative days (POD; post-1; mean +/- SD, 9 +/- 2 POD), and after 14 POD (post-2; mean, 26 +/- 12 POD).

RESULTS

After surgery on post-1, PFT results of FVC, FEV(1), and maximum ventilatory volume (MVV) significantly decreased. Oxygen uptake (VO(2)) at a venous blood lactate level of 2.2 mmol/L (La-2. 2), which was adopted as the empirical anaerobic threshold, and maximum V O(2) (VO(2)max) decreased significantly to 88.2 +/- 7.9% and 73.1 +/- 15.4% of the preoperative values, respectively. La-2.2 min ventilation (VE)/ MVV and maximum VEmax)/MVV increased significantly from 0.36 +/- 0.08 to 0. 66 +/- 0.20 and from 0.58 +/- 0.14 to 0.80 +/- 0.09, respectively. On post-2, though La-2.2 VO(2) did not change, VO(2)max improved significantly to 81.5 +/- 19.7% of the preoperative values, in association with significant increases in maximal tidal volume and VEmax, which were produced by significant increases in the PFT results. La-2.2 VE/MVV also decreased significantly to 0.49 +/- 0.13, which indicated a sufficient recovery of respiratory reserve at submaximal exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

The initial drop of exercise capacity after lung resection seems to be derived from both circulatory and ventilatory limitations. Further, the subsequent recovery within 1 month seems to be produced by an improvement in ventilatory limitation, which was caused by the surgical injury to the chest wall.

Patient preferences regarding possible outcomes of lung resection: what outcomes should preoperative evaluations target?

CONTEXT

Lung resection can lead to significant postoperative complications: Although many reports describe the likelihood of postoperative problems, such as atelectasis, pneumonia, and prolonged ventilator dependence, it is unclear whether patients perceive these outcomes as sufficiently severe to influence their decisions about surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patients' preferences regarding possible outcomes of lung resection, including traditional complications reported in the lung surgery literature and outcomes that describe functional limitation.

DESIGN

Utility analysis.

SETTING

A community hospital internal medicine clinic, a private internal medicine practice, and a private pulmonary practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-four patients, aged 50 to 75 years, who were awaiting appointments at the designated clinic sites.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Patients' strength of preference regarding potential outcomes of lung resection as derived from health utility scores.

RESULTS

Common postoperative complications were assigned high utility scores by patients. On a scale for which 1.0 represents perfect health and 0 represents death, postoperative atelectasis, pneumonia, and 3 days of mechanical ventilation were all rated >0.75. Scores describing limited physical function were strikingly low. Specifically, activity limited to bed to chair movement and the need for complete assistance with activities of daily living were all assigned utility scores <0.2. Twenty-four-hour oxygen dependence was scored at 0.33. Presence or absence of pulmonary illness did not predict scores for any outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Whether patients suffer from chronic lung disease or not, they do not regard the postoperative outcomes reported in the lung surgery literature as sufficiently morbid to forego important surgery. However, physical debility is perceived as extremely undesirable, and anticipation of its occurrence could deter surgery. Therefore, identification of preoperative predictors of postoperative physical debility would be invaluable for counseling patients who face difficult decisions about lung resection.

Improvement of pulmonary function after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in emphysematous patients

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary emphysema is frequently associated with lung cancer and, because of the impaired pulmonary function involved, it may contraindicate surgical treatment. However, improvement of pulmonary function has been observed after surgical resection in patients with advanced emphysema. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pulmonary emphysema, as assessed by pulmonary function tests and radiological evaluation, can influence postoperative respiratory function after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Respiratory function was evaluated before and after lobectomy for NSCLC. Radiological evaluation of emphysema was performed on chest X-ray and CT scan. Patients that had undergone chemo- or radiotherapy or had segmental or lobar atelectasis were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients entered the study. A decrease in static lung volumes was observed after surgery. Total lung capacity (TLC) decreased from 6.58+/-0.92 to 5.46+/-0.77 l; functional residual capacity (FRC) from 3.70+/-0.88 to 2.96+/-0.73 1 and residual volume (RV) from 2.93+/-0.78 to 2.2+/-0.53 l. However, in a subgroup of 10 patients (Group 1), dynamic volumes after surgery were unchanged or slightly increased (forced vital capacity (FVC) from 3.23+/-0.65 to 3.3+/-0.68 l; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from 2.14+/-0.51 to 2.25+/-0.54 l), and airway resistances (sRaw) decreased from 15.58+/-5.18 to 11.42+/-5.25 cm H2O/s. Preoperative data showed that these patients had a greater obstruction, with FEV1 changing from 69+/-12.42 to 72.70+/-13.72% of predicted, as compared with a change from 87+/-12.7 to 72.08+/-13.10% in the other group of 25 patients (Group 2). Correlation analysis reached statistical significance between FEV1% variation (deltaFEV1%) and preoperative FEV1 and FVC% (r = -0.49, P = 0.002 and r = -0.5, P = 0.001, respectively) and between delta (FEV1)% and radiological scores for 3-level CT (r = 0.39, P = 0.04) and the sum of chest X-ray, single and 3-level CT scores (r = 0.49, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary function may remain unchanged or even increase after lobectomy in patients with a pronounced emphysematous component of airway obstruction. The identification of preoperative parameters that identify this group of patients could extend the indications for the treatment of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary emphysema.