51
|
Lao JP, Cloud V, Huang CC, Grubb J, Thacker D, Lee CY, Dresser ME, Hunter N, Bishop DK. Meiotic crossover control by concerted action of Rad51-Dmc1 in homolog template bias and robust homeostatic regulation. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003978. [PMID: 24367271 PMCID: PMC3868528 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 10/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
During meiosis, repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by recombination promotes pairing of homologous chromosomes and their connection by crossovers. Two DNA strand-exchange proteins, Rad51 and Dmc1, are required for meiotic recombination in many organisms. Studies in budding yeast imply that Rad51 acts to regulate Dmc1's strand exchange activity, while its own exchange activity is inhibited. However, in a dmc1 mutant, elimination of inhibitory factor, Hed1, activates Rad51's strand exchange activity and results in high levels of recombination without participation of Dmc1. Here we show that Rad51-mediated meiotic recombination is not subject to regulatory processes associated with high-fidelity chromosome segregation. These include homolog bias, a process that directs strand exchange between homologs rather than sister chromatids. Furthermore, activation of Rad51 does not effectively substitute for Dmc1's chromosome pairing activity, nor does it ensure formation of the obligate crossovers required for accurate homolog segregation. We further show that Dmc1's dominance in promoting strand exchange between homologs involves repression of Rad51's strand-exchange activity. This function of Dmc1 is independent of Hed1, but requires the meiotic kinase, Mek1. Hed1 makes a relatively minor contribution to homolog bias, but nonetheless this is important for normal morphogenesis of synaptonemal complexes and efficient crossing-over especially when DSB numbers are decreased. Super-resolution microscopy shows that Dmc1 also acts to organize discrete complexes of a Mek1 partner protein, Red1, into clusters along lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes; this activity may also contribute to homolog bias. Finally, we show that when interhomolog bias is defective, recombination is buffered by two feedback processes, one that increases the fraction of events that yields crossovers, and a second that we propose involves additional DSB formation in response to defective homolog interactions. Thus, robust crossover homeostasis is conferred by integrated regulation at initiation, strand-exchange and maturation steps of meiotic recombination. Meiosis is the specialized cell division that produces gametes by precisely reducing the chromosome copy number from two to one. Accurate segregation of homologous chromosome pairs requires they be connected by crossing-over, the precise breakage and exchange of chromosome arms that is carried out by a process called recombination. Recombination is regulated so each pair of homologous chromosomes becomes connected by at least one crossover. We studied the roles of two recombination proteins, Rad51 and Dmc1, which can act directly to join homologous DNA molecules. Our evidence supports the idea that Dmc1 is the dominant joining activity, while Rad51 acts indirectly with other proteins to support and regulate Dmc1. Furthermore, Hed1, an inhibitor of Rad51's DNA joining activity, is also shown to enhance the efficiency of crossing-over. Cells in which Rad51 is activated to promote DNA joining in place of Dmc1 have unregulated and inefficient crossing-over that often leaves chromosome pairs without the requisite crossover. Despite these defects, most cells that use Rad51 in place of Dmc1 complete meiosis and produce high levels of crossovers. Our results indicate that compensatory processes ensure that meiotic cells accumulate high levels of crossover intermediates before progressing to the first round of chromosome segregation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica P. Lao
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
- Genetics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
| | - Veronica Cloud
- Committee on Genetics, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Chu-Chun Huang
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Grubb
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Drew Thacker
- Weil Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Chih-Ying Lee
- Program in Cell Cycle and Cancer Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
| | - Michael E. Dresser
- Program in Cell Cycle and Cancer Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
| | - Neil Hunter
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
- Genetics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
- Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
- Department of Cell Biology & Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
- * E-mail: (NH); (DKB)
| | - Douglas K. Bishop
- Committee on Genetics, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Chicago, Cummings Life Science Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
- * E-mail: (NH); (DKB)
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Evidence that masking of synapsis imperfections counterbalances quality control to promote efficient meiosis. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003963. [PMID: 24339786 PMCID: PMC3854781 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Accepted: 10/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Reduction in ploidy to generate haploid gametes during sexual reproduction is accomplished by the specialized cell division program of meiosis. Pairing between homologous chromosomes and assembly of the synaptonemal complex at their interface (synapsis) represent intermediate steps in the meiotic program that are essential to form crossover recombination-based linkages between homologs, which in turn enable segregation of the homologs to opposite poles at the meiosis I division. Here, we challenge the mechanisms of pairing and synapsis during C. elegans meiosis by disrupting the normal 1∶1 correspondence between homologs through karyotype manipulation. Using a combination of cytological tools, including S-phase labeling to specifically identify X chromosome territories in highly synchronous cohorts of nuclei and 3D rendering to visualize meiotic chromosome structures and organization, our analysis of trisomic (triplo-X) and polyploid meiosis provides insight into the principles governing pairing and synapsis and how the meiotic program is “wired” to maximize successful sexual reproduction. We show that chromosomes sort into homologous groups regardless of chromosome number, then preferentially achieve pairwise synapsis during a period of active chromosome mobilization. Further, comparisons of synapsis configurations in triplo-X germ cells that are proficient or defective for initiating recombination suggest a role for recombination in restricting chromosomal interactions to a pairwise state. Increased numbers of homologs prolong markers of the chromosome mobilization phase and/or boost germline apoptosis, consistent with triggering quality control mechanisms that promote resolution of synapsis problems and/or cull meiocytes containing synapsis defects. However, we also uncover evidence for the existence of mechanisms that “mask” defects, thus allowing resumption of prophase progression and survival of germ cells despite some asynapsis. We propose that coupling of saturable masking mechanisms with stringent quality controls maximizes meiotic success by making progression and survival dependent on achieving a level of synapsis sufficient for crossover formation without requiring perfect synapsis. Diploid organisms must produce haploid gametes prior to sexual reproduction in order to maintain a constant number of chromosomes from one generation to the next. Ploidy reduction is accomplished during meiosis and requires crossover recombination-based linkages between homologous chromosomes. Here, we manipulate karyotype in C. elegans to probe the mechanisms that govern stable, pairwise, homologous associations essential for crossover formation. We find that chromosomes sort into homolog groups regardless of number prior to stabilizing interactions (“synapsing”) in a preferentially pairwise manner. Increased numbers of homologs delay meiotic progression and/or boost cell death, reflecting operation of quality control mechanisms that either buy time to correct synapsis problems or eliminate defective cells. Moreover, we found evidence for mechanisms that can “mask” synapsis imperfections, thus allowing resumption of meiotic progression and survival of germ cells when synapsis is “good enough”, albeit imperfect. This strategy would maximize meiotic success by making progression and survival contingent on achieving a level of synapsis sufficient for crossover formation without imposing an onerous and unnecessary requirement for perfect synapsis. We suggest that the regulatory logic of coupling saturable masking mechanisms with stringent quality controls may be employed widely to maximize efficiency of biological circuits.
Collapse
|
53
|
Meiotic chromosome structures constrain and respond to designation of crossover sites. Nature 2013; 502:703-6. [PMID: 24107990 PMCID: PMC3920622 DOI: 10.1038/nature12577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Crossover (CO) recombination events between homologous chromosomes are required to form chiasmata, temporary connections between homologs that ensure their proper segregation at meiosis I1. Despite this requirement for COs and an excess of the double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) that are the initiating events for meiotic recombination, most organisms make very few COs per chromosome pair2. Moreover, COs tend to inhibit the formation of other COs nearby on the same chromosome pair, a poorly understood phenomenon known as CO interference3,4. Here we show that the synaptonemal complex (SC), a meiosis-specific structure that assembles between aligned homologous chromosomes, both constrains and is altered by CO recombination events. Utilizing a cytological marker of CO sites in Caenorhabditis elegans5, we demonstrate that partial depletion of the SC central region proteins (SYPs) attenuates CO interference, elevating COs and reducing the effective distance over which interference operates, indicating that SYPs limit COs. Moreover, we show that COs are associated with a local 0.4-0.5 μm increase in chromosome axis length. We propose that meiotic CO regulation operates as a self-limiting system in which meiotic chromosome structures establish an environment that promotes CO formation, which in turn alters chromosome structure to inhibit other COs at additional sites.
Collapse
|
54
|
Chromosome movement in meiosis I prophase of Caenorhabditis elegans. Chromosoma 2013; 123:15-24. [PMID: 24036686 PMCID: PMC3967079 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-013-0436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2013] [Revised: 08/29/2013] [Accepted: 08/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Rapid chromosome movement during prophase of the first meiotic division has been observed in many organisms. It is generally concomitant with formation of the “meiotic chromosome bouquet,” a special chromosome configuration in which one or both chromosome ends attach to the nuclear envelope and become concentrated within a limited area. The precise function of the chromosomal bouquet is still not fully understood. Chromosome mobility is implicated in homologous chromosome pairing, synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and resolution of chromosome entanglements. The basic mechanistic module through which forces are exerted on chromosomes is widely conserved; however, phenotypic differences have been reported among various model organisms once movement is abrogated. Movements are transmitted to the chromosome ends by the nuclear membrane-bridging SUN/KASH complex and are dependent on cytoskeletal filaments and motor proteins located in the cytoplasm. Here we review the recent findings on chromosome mobility during meiosis in an animal model system: the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode.
Collapse
|
55
|
Rosu S, Zawadzki KA, Stamper EL, Libuda DE, Reese AL, Dernburg AF, Villeneuve AM. The C. elegans DSB-2 protein reveals a regulatory network that controls competence for meiotic DSB formation and promotes crossover assurance. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003674. [PMID: 23950729 PMCID: PMC3738457 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Accepted: 06/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
For most organisms, chromosome segregation during meiosis relies on deliberate induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and repair of a subset of these DSBs as inter-homolog crossovers (COs). However, timing and levels of DSB formation must be tightly controlled to avoid jeopardizing genome integrity. Here we identify the DSB-2 protein, which is required for efficient DSB formation during C. elegans meiosis but is dispensable for later steps of meiotic recombination. DSB-2 localizes to chromatin during the time of DSB formation, and its disappearance coincides with a decline in RAD-51 foci marking early recombination intermediates and precedes appearance of COSA-1 foci marking CO-designated sites. These and other data suggest that DSB-2 and its paralog DSB-1 promote competence for DSB formation. Further, immunofluorescence analyses of wild-type gonads and various meiotic mutants reveal that association of DSB-2 with chromatin is coordinated with multiple distinct aspects of the meiotic program, including the phosphorylation state of nuclear envelope protein SUN-1 and dependence on RAD-50 to load the RAD-51 recombinase at DSB sites. Moreover, association of DSB-2 with chromatin is prolonged in mutants impaired for either DSB formation or formation of downstream CO intermediates. These and other data suggest that association of DSB-2 with chromatin is an indicator of competence for DSB formation, and that cells respond to a deficit of CO-competent recombination intermediates by prolonging the DSB-competent state. In the context of this model, we propose that formation of sufficient CO-competent intermediates engages a negative feedback response that leads to cessation of DSB formation as part of a major coordinated transition in meiotic prophase progression. The proposed negative feedback regulation of DSB formation simultaneously (1) ensures that sufficient DSBs are made to guarantee CO formation and (2) prevents excessive DSB levels that could have deleterious effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Rosu
- Departments of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Karl A. Zawadzki
- Departments of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Ericca L. Stamper
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Diana E. Libuda
- Departments of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Angela L. Reese
- Departments of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Abby F. Dernburg
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America
- Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Anne M. Villeneuve
- Departments of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Stamper EL, Rodenbusch SE, Rosu S, Ahringer J, Villeneuve AM, Dernburg AF. Identification of DSB-1, a protein required for initiation of meiotic recombination in Caenorhabditis elegans, illuminates a crossover assurance checkpoint. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003679. [PMID: 23990794 PMCID: PMC3749324 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2013] [Accepted: 06/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Meiotic recombination, an essential aspect of sexual reproduction, is initiated by programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs are catalyzed by the widely-conserved Spo11 enzyme; however, the activity of Spo11 is regulated by additional factors that are poorly conserved through evolution. To expand our understanding of meiotic regulation, we have characterized a novel gene, dsb-1, that is specifically required for meiotic DSB formation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. DSB-1 localizes to chromosomes during early meiotic prophase, coincident with the timing of DSB formation. DSB-1 also promotes normal protein levels and chromosome localization of DSB-2, a paralogous protein that plays a related role in initiating recombination. Mutations that disrupt crossover formation result in prolonged DSB-1 association with chromosomes, suggesting that nuclei may remain in a DSB-permissive state. Extended DSB-1 localization is seen even in mutants with defects in early recombination steps, including spo-11, suggesting that the absence of crossover precursors triggers the extension. Strikingly, failure to form a crossover precursor on a single chromosome pair is sufficient to extend the localization of DSB-1 on all chromosomes in the same nucleus. Based on these observations we propose a model for crossover assurance that acts through DSB-1 to maintain a DSB-permissive state until all chromosome pairs acquire crossover precursors. This work identifies a novel component of the DSB machinery in C. elegans, and sheds light on an important pathway that regulates DSB formation for crossover assurance. For most eukaryotes, recombination between homologous chromosomes during meiosis is an essential aspect of sexual reproduction. Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed double-strand breaks in DNA, which have the potential to induce mutations if not efficiently repaired. To better understand the mechanisms that govern the initiation of recombination and regulate the formation of double-strand breaks, we use the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system. Here we describe a new gene, dsb-1, that is required for double-strand break formation in C. elegans. Through analysis of the encoded DSB-1 protein we illuminate an important regulatory pathway that promotes crossover recombination events on all chromosome pairs to ensure successful meiosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ericca L. Stamper
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley; Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Stacia E. Rodenbusch
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley; Berkeley, California, United States of America
| | - Simona Rosu
- Department of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Julie Ahringer
- The Gurdon Institute and Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Anne M. Villeneuve
- Department of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Abby F. Dernburg
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), University of California, Berkeley; Berkeley, California, United States of America
- Department of Genome Dynamics, Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, United States of America
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Carlton PM. Application of advanced fluorescence microscopy to the structure of meiotic chromosomes. Biophys Rev 2013; 5:313-322. [PMID: 28510112 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-013-0116-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2012] [Accepted: 03/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomes undergoing meiosis are defined by a macromolecular protein assembly called the synaptonemal complex which holds homologs together and carries out important meiotic functions. By retaining the molecular specificity, multiplexing ability, and in situ imaging capabilities of fluorescence microscopy, but with vastly increased resolution, 3D-SIM and other superresolution techniques are poised to make significant discoveries about the structure and function of the synaptonemal complex. This review discusses recent developments in this field and poses questions approachable with current and future technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Carlton
- Institute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (WPI-iCeMS), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Rog O, Dernburg AF. Chromosome pairing and synapsis during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2013; 25:349-56. [PMID: 23578368 DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2013] [Revised: 02/27/2013] [Accepted: 03/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Meiosis is the specialized cell division cycle that produces haploid gametes to enable sexual reproduction. Reduction of chromosome number by half requires elaborate chromosome dynamics that occur in meiotic prophase to establish physical linkages between each pair of homologous chromosomes. Caenorhabditis elegans has emerged as an excellent model organism for molecular studies of meiosis, enabling investigators to combine the power of molecular genetics, cytology, and live analysis. Here we focus on recent studies that have shed light on how chromosomes find and identify their homologous partners, and the structural changes that accompany and mediate these interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofer Rog
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3220, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
Lake CM, Hawley RS. The molecular control of meiotic chromosomal behavior: events in early meiotic prophase in Drosophila oocytes. Annu Rev Physiol 2012; 74:425-51. [PMID: 22335798 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
We review the critical events in early meiotic prophase in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes. We focus on four aspects of this process: the formation of the synaptonemal complex (SC) and its role in maintaining homologous chromosome pairings, the critical roles of the meiosis-specific process of centromere clustering in the formation of a full-length SC, the mechanisms by which preprogrammed double-strand breaks initiate meiotic recombination, and the checkpoints that govern the progression and coordination of these processes. Central to this discussion are the roles that somatic pairing events play in establishing the necessary conditions for proper SC formation, the roles of centromere pairing in synapsis initiation, and the mechanisms by which oocytes detect failures in SC formation and/or recombination. Finally, we correlate what is known in Drosophila oocytes with our understanding of these processes in other systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathleen M Lake
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
Dombecki CR, Chiang ACY, Kang HJ, Bilgir C, Stefanski NA, Neva BJ, Klerkx EPF, Nabeshima K. The chromodomain protein MRG-1 facilitates SC-independent homologous pairing during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell 2012; 21:1092-103. [PMID: 22172672 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2010] [Revised: 06/23/2011] [Accepted: 09/26/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Homologous chromosome pairing is a prerequisite to establish physical linkage between homologs, which is critical for faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I. The establishment of pairing is genetically separable from subsequent synapsis, defined as stabilization of pairing by the synaptonemal complex (SC). The underlying mechanism of presynaptic pairing is poorly understood. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a unique cis-acting element, the pairing center (PC), is essential for presynaptic pairing; however, it is not known whether and how the remainder of the chromosome contributes to presynaptic pairing. Here we report direct evidence for presynaptic pairing activity intrinsic to non-PC regions, which is facilitated by a conserved chromodomain protein, MRG-1. In mrg-1 loss-of-function mutants, pairing is compromised specifically in non-PC regions, leading to nonhomologous SC assembly. Our data support a model in which presynaptic alignment in non-PC regions collaborates with initial PC pairing to ensure correct homologous synapsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn R Dombecki
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Pairing centers recruit a Polo-like kinase to orchestrate meiotic chromosome dynamics in C. elegans. Dev Cell 2011; 21:934-47. [PMID: 22018922 DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2011] [Revised: 06/30/2011] [Accepted: 09/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Faithful segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis requires pairing, synapsis, and crossing-over. In C. elegans, homolog pairing and synapsis depend on pairing centers (PCs), special regions near one end of each chromosome that interact with the nuclear envelope (NE) and cytoplasmic microtubules. Here, we report that PCs are required for nuclear reorganization at the onset of meiosis. We demonstrate that PCs recruit the Polo-like kinase PLK-2 to induce NE remodeling, chromosome pairing, and synapsis. Recruitment of PLK-2 is also required to mediate a cell cycle delay and selective apoptosis of nuclei containing unsynapsed chromosomes, establishing a molecular link between these two quality control mechanisms. This work reveals unexpected functions for the conserved family of Polo-like kinases, and advances our understanding of how meiotic processes are properly coordinated to ensure transmission of genetic information from parents to progeny.
Collapse
|
62
|
Joyce EF, McKim KS. Meiotic checkpoints and the interchromosomal effect on crossing over in Drosophila females. Fly (Austin) 2011; 5:134-40. [PMID: 21339705 DOI: 10.4161/fly.5.2.14767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
During prophase of meiosis I, genetic recombination is initiated with a Spo11-dependent DNA double-strand break (DSB). Repair of these DSBs can generate crossovers, which become chiasmata and are important for the process of chromosome segregation. To ensure at least one chiasma per homologous pair of chromosomes, the number and distribution of crossovers is regulated. One system contributing to the distribution of crossovers is the pachytene checkpoint, which requires the conserved gene pch2 that encodes an AAA+ATPase family member. Pch2-dependent pachytene checkpoint function causes delays in pachytene progression when there are defects in processes required for crossover formation, such as mutations in DSB-repair genes and when there are defects in the structure of the meiotic chromosome axis. Thus, the pachytene checkpoint appears to monitor events leading up to the generation of crossovers. Interestingly, heterozygous chromosome rearrangements cause Pch2-dependent pachytene delays and as little as two breaks in the continuity of the paired chromosome axes are sufficient to evoke checkpoint activity. These chromosome rearrangements also cause an interchromosomal effect on recombination whereby crossing over is suppressed between the affected chromosomes but is increased between the normal chromosome pairs. We have shown that this phenomenon is also due to pachytene checkpoint activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric F Joyce
- Waksman Institute and Department of Genetics, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
63
|
An asymmetric chromosome pair undergoes synaptic adjustment and crossover redistribution during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis: implications for sex chromosome evolution. Genetics 2011; 187:685-99. [PMID: 21212235 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.124958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Heteromorphic sex chromosomes, such as the X/Y pair in mammals, differ in size and DNA sequence yet function as homologs during meiosis; this bivalent asymmetry presents special challenges for meiotic completion. In Caenorhabditis elegans males carrying mnT12, an X;IV fusion chromosome, mnT12 and IV form an asymmetric bivalent: chromosome IV sequences are capable of pairing and synapsis, while the contiguous X portion of mnT12 lacks a homologous pairing partner. Here, we investigate the meiotic behavior of this asymmetric neo-X/Y chromosome pair in C. elegans. Through immunolocalization of the axis component HIM-3, we demonstrate that the unpaired X axis has a distinct, coiled morphology while synapsed axes are linear and extended. By showing that loci at the fusion-proximal end of IV become unpaired while remaining synapsed as pachytene progresses, we directly demonstrate the occurrence of synaptic adjustment in this organism. We further demonstrate that meiotic crossover distribution is markedly altered in males with the asymmetric mnT12/+ bivalent relative to controls, resulting in greatly reduced crossover formation near the X;IV fusion point and elevated crossovers at the distal end of the bivalent. In effect, the distal end of the bivalent acts as a neo-pseudoautosomal region in these males. We discuss implications of these findings for mechanisms that ensure crossover formation during meiosis. Furthermore, we propose that redistribution of crossovers triggered by bivalent asymmetry may be an important driving force in sex chromosome evolution.
Collapse
|