Effect of seating position and restraint use on injuries to children in motor vehicle crashes

Injury prevention advice in top-selling parenting books

OBJECTIVE

Parenting books are a commonly used source of information on how to keep children and adolescents safe from injuries, the leading cause of death and disability for children aged 1 to 18 years. The content and the quality of the messages contained in these books have not been evaluated formally. The objective of this study was to determine the quantity and the quality of injury prevention messages contained in popular parenting books.

METHODS

Top-selling parenting books for 2 major booksellers were reviewed to determine the presence and the accuracy of injury prevention messages as compared with those recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) through The Injury Prevention Program (TIPP) for younger children, aged 0 to 12 years, and the American Medical Association (AMA) through its Parent Package for the safety of adolescents.

RESULTS

Forty-six parenting books were reviewed, including 41 with messages related to younger children and 19 with messages related to adolescents. These books varied widely with regard to the number of injury prevention messages included. Although some books covered the great majority of TIPP messages for parents of young children, others included very few. In the case of books that address safety for adolescents, no book had more than half of the messages recommended by the AMA. Prevention of burns and motor vehicle injury were the most commonly addressed injury prevention topics in the books focused on younger children, whereas gun safety was the most prevalent injury prevention topic in books that focused on adolescents. Books that were authored by physicians addressed more of the recommended topics and messages than books that were written by authors from other professional backgrounds. The quality of messages was good, ie, consistent with the advice given by the AAP and the AMA. In only a few cases, the parenting books gave injury prevention advice that was inconsistent with recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, books on parenting adolescents are less likely to contain injury prevention messages than those that address younger children. However, the most frequent injury prevention messages for parents of adolescents describe strategies to prevent firearm injury, a leading cause of death for children in this age group. More emphasis should be placed on prevention of motor vehicle injuries, especially as relates to adolescents. Pediatricians and primary care physicians need to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of parenting manuals in providing adequate guidance related to injury prevention.

Effects of child age and body size on serious injury from passenger air-bag presence in motor vehicle crashes

BACKGROUND

Current recommendations regarding children traveling in passenger vehicles equipped with passenger air bags are based, in part, on evidence that the air-bag-related risk of injury and death is higher for children < or =12 years of age. However, the age or body size required to allow a child to be seated safely in front of a passenger air bag is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate specific cutoff points for age, height, and weight as effect modifiers of the association between the presence of a passenger air bag and serious injury among children involved in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs), while controlling for important crash factors.

DESIGN

A national population-based cohort of children involved in MVCs and included in the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) Crashworthiness Data System (CDS) database from 1995 to 2002 was studied. NASS CDS clusters, strata, and weights were included in all analyses.

SUBJECTS

Children 0 to 18 years of age involved in MVCs and seated in the right front passenger seat.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Serious injury, defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of > or =3 for any body region.

RESULTS

A total of 3790 patients (1 month to 18 years of age) were represented in the NASS CDS database during the 8-year period. Sixty children (1.6%) were seriously injured (Abbreviated Injury Scale score of > or =3). Among age, height, and weight, age of 0 to 14 years (versus 15-18 years) was the only consistent effect modifier of the association between air-bag presence (or air-bag deployment) and serious injury, particularly for crashes with a moderate probability of injury. In analyses stratified according to age and adjusted for important crash factors, children 0 to 14 years of age involved in frontal collisions seemed to be at increased risk of serious injury from air-bag presence (odds ratio [OR]: 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-30.9) and deployment (OR: 6.13; 95% CI: 0.30-126), although these values did not reach statistical significance. Among children 15 to 18 years of age involved in frontal collisions, there was a protective effect on injury from both air-bag presence (OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.75) and deployment (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.09-0.99). These findings persisted in analyses involving all collision types. We did not identify similar cutoff points for height or weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Children up to 14 years of age may be at risk for serious preventable injury when seated in front of a passenger air bag, and children 15 to 18 years of age seem to experience protective effects of air-bag presence and deployment. Age may be a better marker than height or weight for risk assessment regarding children and air bags.

Effects of seating position and appropriate restraint use on the risk of injury to children in motor vehicle crashes

BACKGROUND

Currently, many states are upgrading their child restraint laws to include provisions for the use of age-appropriate restraints through 6 to 8 years of age, with some also requiring rear seating for children, enabling the laws to be in closer alignment with best-practice recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationships of seating position and restraint status to the risk of injury among children in passenger vehicle crashes.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of children <16 years of age who were involved in crashes of insured vehicles in 15 states, with data collected via insurance claims records and a telephone survey. A probability sample of 17980 children in 11506 crashes, representing 229106 children in 146613 crashes, was collected between December 1, 1998, and November 30, 2002. Parent reports were used to define restraint status, seating position, and occurrence of clinically significant injuries, with the use of a previously validated instrument.

RESULTS

Approximately 62% of the children used seat belts, 35% used child restraints, and 3% used no restraint. Nearly 4 of 5 children sat in the rear seat, with one half of all children being restrained appropriately for their age in the rear, although this varied according to the age of the child. Overall, 1.6% of children suffered serious injuries, 13.5% had minor injuries, and 84.9% did not have any injury. Unrestrained children in the front were at the highest risk of injury and appropriately restrained children in the rear were at the lowest risk, for all age groups. Inappropriately restrained children were at nearly twice the risk of injury, compared with appropriately restrained children (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-2.3), whereas unrestrained children were at >3 times the risk (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 2.5-4.1). The effect of seating row was smaller than the effect of restraint status; children in the front seat were at 40% greater risk of injury, compared with children in the rear seat (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.7). Had all children in the study population been appropriately restrained in the rear seat, 1014 serious injuries (95% CI: 675-1353 injuries) would have been prevented (with the assumption that restraint effectiveness does not depend on a variety of other driver-related, child-related, crash-related, vehicle-related, and environmental factors).

CONCLUSIONS

Age-appropriate restraint confers relatively more safety benefit than rear seating, but the 2 work synergistically to provide the best protection for children in crashes. These results support the current focus on age-appropriate restraint in recently upgraded state child restraint laws. However, it is important to note that considerable added benefit would be realized with additional requirements for rear seating.

Overcrowded Motor Vehicle Trauma from the Smuggling of Illegal Immigrants in the Desert of the Southwest

Overcrowded motor vehicle crashes caused by the very active criminal enterprise of smuggling illegal immigrants in the desert of the Southwest is a recent and under-recognized trauma etiology. A computerized database search from 1990 through 2003 of local newspaper reports of overcrowded motor vehicle crashes along the 281 miles of Arizona's border with Mexico was conducted. This area was covered by two level I trauma centers, but since July 2003 is now served only by the University Medical Center. Each of these crashes involved a single motor vehicle in poor mechanical shape packed with illegal immigrants. Speeding out of control on bad tires, high-speed rollovers result in ejection of most passengers. Since 1999, there have been 38 crashes involving 663 passengers (an average of 17 per vehicle) with an injury rate of 49 per cent and a mortality rate of 9 per cent. This relatively recent phenomenon (no reports from before 1998) of trauma resulting from human smuggling is lethal and demonstrates the smugglers’ wanton disregard for human life, particularly when facing apprehension. Even a few innocent bystanders have been killed. These crashes overwhelm a region's trauma resources and must be recognized when planning the distribution of trauma resources to border states.

Factors associated with rear seating of children in motor vehicles: a study in two low-income, predominantly Hispanic communities

This study examined child seating patterns in two predominantly low-income, Hispanic communities in Massachusetts. The purpose was to determine the factors associated with child rear seating in the community as a whole and for a subset of Hispanic motorists. Five hundred and five vehicles carrying child passengers and no adult other than the driver were observed in parking lots of fast food restaurants and grocery stores. Four hundred and thirty-two vehicle drivers agreed to be interviewed. A child was defined as a passenger younger than age 12 as determined by appearance and height (head below the vehicle headrest when seated). Variables under study included driver gender, age, ethnicity, and educational attainment; driver shoulder belt use; driver perception of passenger-side airbag presence; and the number and ages of children in the car. Overall, 51% of vehicles were observed with all children seated in the rear. In a bivariate analysis, child rear seating was strongly associated with female drivers ( P = 0.01), younger drivers ( P = 0.02) driver shoulder belt use ( P < 0.00), perceived presence of a passenger-side airbag ( P < 0.00), all children in the vehicle <or=6 years old (P < 0.00), and fewer than three children in the vehicle ( P 0.01). Non-Hispanic ethnicity was weakly associated with child rear seating ( P = 0.09). In the multivariate analysis, only the association between child rear seating and all children in the vehicle <or=6 years old remained strong (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.3). Factors associated with rear seating were similar between Hispanic and non-Hispanic motorists. Controlling for other factors, the presence of a passenger-side airbag appeared to be more strongly associated with rear seating among non-Hispanics compared to Hispanics (RR 1.5 versus 1.1). Fewer Hispanic motorists drove vehicles with all children in the rear compared with the non-Hispanic motorists (48% versus 56%); this difference appears to be associated with the finding that fewer Hispanic drivers wore their seat belt. For both Hispanic and non-Hispanic motorists, efforts to increase child rear seating should focus on older children, male drivers, and on increasing general motor vehicle safety behavior (e.g. seat belt use). Messages should be culturally appropriate and should emphasize driver seat belt use in conjunction with rear seating and the importance of rear seating regardless of the presence of a passenger-side airbag.

Factors Associated With Front Row Seating of Children in Motor Vehicle Crashes

BACKGROUND

Current safety guidelines recommend that children age 12 or younger sit in the rear seat of passenger vehicles. However, front row seating among these children remains common. To develop future educational and other interventions to decrease front row seating of young children, it is important to examine factors associated with this behavior.

METHODS

We identified factors associated with front row seating of children 12 years of age or younger using data from a cross-sectional study of children who were the single passenger in crashes of insured vehicles in 15 U.S. states. Data were collected by insurance claims records and a telephone interview. A probability sample of 3775 crashes representing 27678 crashes with child occupants was collected between 1 December 1998, and 30 November 2002. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to identify specific child, driver, and vehicle characteristics associated with front row seating.

RESULTS

When children were the sole occupants in the vehicle, approximately 1 in 3 (31%) sat in the front seat. The child's age and restraint use, the driver's age and relationship to the child passenger, the type of vehicle, and the presence of a passenger airbag were all associated with front row seating.

CONCLUSIONS

Educational interventions can be tailored to address the specific needs of subgroups of drivers and children to reduce front row seating. In addition, these data could be used to support legislative interventions to limit front row seating of younger children when a teenager is driving.

Passenger seating position and the risk of passenger death or injury in traffic crashes

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the association of passenger seat position with the risk of death and serious injury for passengers in traffic crashes.

METHODS

Using 1993-2000 data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Crashworthiness Data System (CDS), the risk ratio for death and serious injury was estimated for rear seat passengers compared with front seat passengers in motor vehicle crashes.

RESULTS

The adjusted risk ratio for death of passengers in the rear seat in a crash was 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.81). Rear seat passenger position was also associated with a decrease in the risk of death and serious injury compared with the front seat passenger position: risk ratio=0.67 (95% CI 0.57-0.78).

CONCLUSION

We estimated that the rear seat passenger position may reduce the risk of death in a motor vehicle crash by about 39% and reduce the risk of death or serious injury in a crash by 33%, compared with the front seat passenger position. If the associations that we report are causal, sitting in the rear seat, compared with the front seat, may prevent about 4 in 10 passenger deaths, or 3 in 10 passenger deaths and injuries, that might otherwise occur.

Child safety seat knowledge among parents utilizing emergency services in a level I trauma center in Southern California

OBJECTIVE

To determine the level of child safety seat (CSS) and airbag safety knowledge in parents who utilize emergency care services for their children and to determine factors that influence knowledge of safe transportation of children.

METHODS

A prospective survey study was conducted in a 42 000-visit-per-year Level I trauma center and emergency department (ED) in Southern California from May through October 2000. Subjects were parents of ED-registered children (< or =6 years). Research assistants administered the survey in the subject's native language. Parent knowledge of age-appropriate restraint use and airbag safety was collected.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty-five subjects were enrolled. Most parents (97%) reported a regular source of pediatric medical care, and 57% had a previous ED visit. Eighty-six percent reported owning a CSS or booster seat. Eighty-one percent were aware that infants in rear-facing CSSs should never be placed in front of an airbag. Only 46% knew that a child weighing 40 to 60 lb should travel in a booster seat, and 59% knew that the State law required CSS use for children up to 4 years and weighing up to 40 lb. When knowledge scores were examined by ethnicity, fluency in English, income, and years of education, fluency was found to have the greatest influence on both CSS and airbag knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nearly all of our subjects admitted that their children had a regular source of care, many parents showed evidence of lack of knowledge of CSS and airbag safety. Furthermore, many parents were not familiar with the state law regarding child restraints. Our findings suggest that parents of small children who utilize emergency care services could benefit from child passenger safety education during their ED visit and that non-English media and materials may be important to reaching this population.

Are seat belt restraints as effective in school age children as in adults? A prospective crash study

OBJECTIVE

To study effectiveness of seat belts for protecting school age children in road vehicle crashes.

DESIGN

Crash examinations by trained investigators.

SETTING

Ten Canadian university based crash investigation centres.

SUBJECTS

470 children aged 4-14 years, with 168 selected for detailed analysis, and 1301 adults.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Use of seat belts by vehicle occupants; severity of injury adjusted for age and crash severity.

RESULTS

Overall, 40% (189/470) of children were unbelted. Of the 335 children in cars driven by belted adults, 73 (22%) were unbelted. The odds of sustaining fatal or moderately severe injury (injury severity score > or =4) for children in the front passenger seat was more than nine times higher for unbelted children than for belted ones (odds ratio 9.8 (95% confidence interval 2.4 to 39.4)) and for those in the rear left seat was more than two times higher for unbelted than for belted children (2.6 (1.1 to 5.9)). The protection afforded by seat belts compared favourably with the results for adults in the same seat positions (odds ratios for unbelted v belted adults of 2.4 and 2.7 for front and rear seat passengers respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Seat belts helped to protect school age children from injury in road vehicle crashes. However, 40% of children were unbelted. Despite standard seat belts being designed for adults, school age children were at least as well protected as adults.

Restraint use and injury patterns among children involved in motor vehicle collisions

BACKGROUND

Motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause of death among children older than 1 year. Use of appropriate restraint systems is associated with reductions in morbidity and mortality in this age group. No studies have evaluated the association between specific injury patterns and restraint use among children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in risks of injuries in different body regions according to restraint use among children 0 to 11 years of age.

METHODS

The 1995 to 1999 National Automotive Sampling System data files were used. The National Automotive Sampling System is a national probability sample of passenger vehicles involved in police-reported tow-away collisions. Information on occupant (seating position, restraint use), collision (change in velocity, vehicle intrusion), and outcome characteristics was evaluated. Risks of injuries in different body regions (Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision score > or = 2) were calculated and compared according to restraint use.

RESULTS

Between 1995 and 1999, there were approximately 1.5 million children 0 to 11 years of age involved in police-reported tow-away MVCs who met the inclusion criteria for this study. Compared with unrestrained children, properly restrained children had significantly lower overall injury risk (risk ratio [RR], 0.37); significant risk reductions were also observed for injuries to the head (RR, 0.18), thorax (RR, 0.35), and lower extremities (RR, 0.26), and mortality (RR, 0.26). Significant risk reductions were not noted when comparing improperly restrained children with unrestrained children.

CONCLUSION

Proper restraint use among children is associated with lower risk of injury. Educational initiatives should focus not only on encouraging restraint use but also on ensuring that parents know the appropriate age-dependent restraint method and how to use it properly.

Predictors of hazardous child seating behavior in fatal motor vehicle crashes: 1990 to 1998

OBJECTIVE

Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death in children ages 5 to 14. Children seated in the front seats of vehicles are at increased risk of death and injury in crashes, particularly in vehicles with passenger-side air bags. This study identifies factors associated with the seating of children in the front seats of vehicles involved in fatal crashes between 1990 and 1998.

METHODS

Using 1990 to 1998 data from the Fatal Analysis Reporting System, a US census of motor vehicle crashes involving a fatality, multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between child seating behavior and vehicle, driver, and occupant characteristics.

RESULTS

The proportion of vehicles carrying children in the front declined from 42% to 31% over the 9-year period. Controlling for driver and vehicle characteristics, the risk of front-seating declined between 1990 and 1998, and this risk was smaller in vehicles carrying only younger children (</=6 years) than in those carrying older children. In the 3 years after the introduction of dual air bags into a significant proportion of the passenger fleet in late 1995, dual air bags were associated with fewer children being seated in the front seat. By the end of 1998, traveling in a vehicle with dual air bags and only children age 6 or younger was associated with a 95% lower chance of a child being seated in the front (odds ratio = 0.05; 95% confidence interval: 0.04-0.08). An important factor in safer seating position was the presence of multiple passengers, especially an older one, and children were at higher risk of front-seating when they traveled alone with the driver.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1990s saw a decline in front-seating of children in vehicles involved in fatal crashes among all types of vehicles and drivers. Although this trend is encouraging, children ages 6 to 12 and children traveling alone with the driver remain at higher risk of being seated in the front. These traveling situations should be targeted for behavioral safety interventions to improve child motor vehicle safety.