Likelihood and Mechanisms of Cross-Allergenicity Between Sulfonamide Antibiotics and Other Drugs Containing a Sulfonamide Functional Group

Acetazolamide and sulfonamide allergy: a not so simple story

Allergies and adverse reactions to sulfonamide medications are quite common. Two distinct categories of drugs are classified as sulfonamides: antibiotics and nonantibiotics. The two groups differ in their chemical structure, use, and the rate at which adverse reactions occur. Cross-reactivity between the two groups has been implied in the past, but is suspect. Acetazolamide, from the nonantibiotic group, is routinely used in the prevention and treatment of high altitude issues and may not need to be avoided in individuals with a history of sulfonamide allergy. This review addresses the differences between the groups and the propensity for intergroup and intragroup adverse reactions based on the available literature. We also examine the different clinical presentations of allergy and adverse reactions, from simple cutaneous reactions with no sequelae through Stevens-Johnson syndrome and anaphylaxis, with risk for significant morbidity and mortality. We offer a systematic approach to determine whether acetazolamide is a safe option for those with a history of allergy to sulfonamides.

Solvatochromic and fluorescence behavior of sulfisoxazole

The Fluorescence spectroscopic and solvatochromic behavior of Sulfisoxazole, a sulfa drug with antimicrobial activities, in various pure solvents of different polarity and hydrogen bonding capability is reported. The fluorescence emission spectrum of sulfisoxazole was found to be solvent polarity dependent, where a notable red shift in emission maximum was observed with increasing solvent polarity as well as hydrogen bonding capability. The effects of the latter two solvent parameters were quantitatively investigated using the methods of Lippert-Mataga and solvatochromic comparison method (SCM) that is based on the Kamlet-Taft equation. Particularly, the Lippert-Mataga method was applied to estimate the dipole moment of the excited state (μ(e)) upon plotting Stokes shift versus solvent polarizability (Δf), where a value of 11.54 Debye was obtained. On the other hand, applying the multiple regression analysis to the SCM method revealed that solvent polarizability (π*) and hydrogen-bond donor capability (α) approximately equally stabilize sulfisoxazole in the excited state with minor destabilization contribution by the hydrogen-bond acceptor capability (β). These findings revealed that the excited state of sulfisoxazole is stabilized by polar solvents, indicating that this drug molecules exhibit larger dipole moment in the excited state than in the ground state, which in turn implies that a potential intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) occurs after excitation.

HLA-B*5901 is strongly associated with methazolamide-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis

AIMS

The carbonic anhydrase inhibitor methazolamide infrequently causes Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). An association between these diseases and the HLA-B59 serotype has been suggested in case reports. This study examined the disease-associated B*59 allele and investigated the association of these diseases with other HLA class I alleles.

METHODS

We performed high-resolution HLA-A, -B and -C genotyping in five patients with methazolamide-induced SJS/TEN using a PCR-sequencing-based typing method and analyzed the association between HLA-class I alleles and occurrence of methazolamide-induced SJS/TEN.

RESULTS

B*5901 and Cw*0102 alleles were observed in all patients and A*2402 was observed in four patients. The B*5901 allele showed the strongest association with methazolamide-induced SJS/TEN (p < 0.001; odds ratio: 249.8; 95% CI: 13.4-4813.5), followed by Cw*0102 (p = 0.004; odds ratio: 22.1; 95% CI: 1.2-414.3), when compared with the general population as a control. The frequency of the patients carrying B*5901, Cw*0102 and A*2402 simultaneously was significantly higher than that in the general population (p < 0.001; odds ratio: 110.1; 95% CI: 11.7-1038.6).

CONCLUSION

A strong association was observed between HLA-B*5901 and methazolamide-induced SJS/TEN in Korean patients. HLA-B*5901 may be a useful screening marker for predicting methazolamide-induced SJS/TEN in patients of Korean and Japanese ancestry.

Approach to the patient with drug allergy

Clinicians commonly encounter patients who report to have drug allergy. In a large part, such allergy corresponds to adverse drug reactions, which are not immune mediated. The incriminated drug need not always be avoided for further therapy. On the other hand, drug allergy may manifest in many unexpected clinical pictures and thus not be recognized. There is no single standardized diagnostic test to confirm the immune-mediated mechanism and to identify the causative drug. Therefore, immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions and their causative drugs have to be considered by the constellation of exposure, timing, and clinical features, including the pattern of organ manifestation. Prior experience with the drug is also an important feature. An allergologic workup with additional investigation may provide some help. Patients should be informed carefully about their drug allergy, whereby symptoms, drug that elicits reaction, modes of diagnosis of drug allergy, and possibly alternatives should be indicated in their allergy passport.

Are excipients really inert ingredients? A review of adverse reactions to excipients in oral dermatologic medications in Canada

BACKGROUND

Whereas several literature reviews have discussed the role of excipients in drug-related reactions, no article has focused specifically on those found in oral dermatologic medications.

METHODS

The Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (CPS) was used to reference the inert ingredients found in oral dermatologic medications. An extensive literature review was subsequently conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE to document adverse reactions to these excipients.

RESULTS

Sixty-three oral dermatologic medications were reviewed. Lactose was commonly used as a filler. Several medications indicated that they were dye, tartrazine, or gluten free. Three medications were found to contain soybean oil and one was found to contain peanut oil.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are documented reactions to excipients in other products in the literature, few reports outline reactions to excipients in oral dermatologic medications. Whether this low frequency is accurate or whether it is due to a lack of reporting remains unknown. If the latter reasoning is correct, dermatologists must be more aware of these possible reactions. This article serves as a reference guide for dermatologists to aid in prescribing medications to individuals with known sensitivities and to assist in working up patients with suspected reactions to inert ingredients.

Dermatology of the patient with HIV

Cutaneous diseases occur in most people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and at a higher rate than people not infected with HIV. Common HIV-related rashes and rashes made unusual by HIV infection are reviewed.

Sumatriptan-naproxen fixed combination for acute treatment of migraine: a critical appraisal

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including naproxen and naproxen sodium, are effective yet nonspecific analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs, which work for a variety of pain and inflammatory syndromes, including migraine. In migraine, their analgesic effect helps relieve the headache, while their anti-inflammatory effect decreases the neurogenic inflammation in the trigeminal ganglion. This is the hypothesized mechanism by which they prevent the development of central sensitization. Triptans, including sumatriptan, work early in the migraine process at the trigeminovascular unit as agonists of the serotonin receptors (5-HT receptors) 1B and 1D. They block vasoconstriction and block transmission of signals to the trigeminal nucleus and thus prevent peripheral sensitization. Therefore, combining these two drugs is an attractive modality for the abortive treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan-naproxen fixed combination tablet (Treximet [sumatriptan-naproxen]) proves to be an effective and well tolerated drug that combines these two mechanisms; yet is far from being the ultimate in migraine abortive therapy, and further research remains essential.

Approach to the patient with drug allergy

Drug allergies are adverse drug reactions mediated by the specific immune system. Despite characteristic signs (eg, skin rash) that raise awareness for possible drug allergies, they are great imitators of disease and may hide behind unexpected symptoms. No single standardized diagnostic test can confirm the immune-mediated mechanism or identify the causative drug; therefore, immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions and their causative drugs must be recognized by the constellation of exposure, timing, and clinical features including the pattern of organ manifestation. Additional allergologic investigations (skin tests, in vitro tests, provocation tests) may provide help in identifying the possible eliciting drug.

Severe allergic reaction to hydrochlorothiazide mimicking septic shock

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is a sulfonamide-containing drug with commonly reported adverse effects that include electrolyte abnormalities, orthostatic hypotension, hyperglycemia, and photosensitivity. A few reports have described rare but serious drug complications such as interstitial pneumonitis, angioedema, and aplastic anemia. We describe a patient who experienced a serious HCTZ-induced adverse event that, to our knowledge, has not yet been reported in the literature. A 78-year-old woman came to the emergency department with dyspnea and severe fatigue; her signs and symptoms were suggestive of septic shock from pneumonia. She was treated accordingly, her condition improved, and she was discharged home. During the next 2 months, the patient returned to the emergency department 2 more times and was hospitalized each time with the same diagnosis. During her third admission, it was discovered that the patient's primary care physician had restarted her HCTZ for hypertension after it had been discontinued during each of the first two hospitalizations. The patient's symptoms began within hours of the first and second hospitalizations and almost immediately after taking a dose of HCTZ on the day of the third hospitalization. Her medical history revealed documented allergic reactions to sulfonamide drugs and penicillin; thus a hypersensitivity reaction to HCTZ was suspected. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated a probable relationship between the patient's hypersensitivity reactions and HCTZ therapy. Because of a lack of evidence showing cross-reactivity among the different classes of sulfonamides, the mechanism of the allergic reaction to HCTZ was unlikely to be cross-sensitivity between sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfonamide nonantibiotic drugs. Although the mechanism is not clear, evidence shows that the allergy to the HCTZ (sulfonamide nonantibiotic) may be due to a predisposition to drug allergies rather than sulfonamide cross-sensitivity. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for these types of allergic reactions.

Allergies to sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfur-containing drugs

OBJECTIVE

To provide a literature review and clinical summary of the evaluation and management of sulfonamide drug reactions.

DATA SOURCES

Published English-language medical literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Selected trials of drug desensitization protocols.

RESULTS

Obtaining a detailed history is invaluable in assessing a history of reactions to sulfonamide medications, because allergy to these drugs remains a clinical diagnosis at present. Numerous efficacious drug desensitization protocols for management have been published and are reviewed in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

The term sulfa allergy is imprecise and misleading and therefore should be discouraged. There are important distinctions between sulfonylarylamines (antimicrobial sulfonamides), nonarylamine (nonantimicrobial) sulfonamides, and sulfones, with regard to allergic and other adverse drug reactions. Most reactions to sulfonylarylamines probably result from multifactorial immunologic and toxic metabolic mechanisms, whereas less is known about the precise mechanisms of reactions to other sulfur-containing drugs.

Safe Use of Meropenem in a Patient with a Possible Nonimmediate Allergy to Imipenem

Strong data are lacking on the cross-reactivity between individual carbapenems. We describe a 48-year-old woman with ventilator-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia who received an 8-day course of imipenem-cilastatin and experienced a delayed (i.e., nonimmediate) hypersensitivity reaction, evidenced by an extensive erythematous macular morbilliform rash and an increased eosinophil count. Eight days after completion of therapy, the pneumonia returned, and it was decided to avoid using imipenem-cilastatin; she was administered a 14-day course of meropenem. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a nonimmediate hypersensitivity reaction to imipenem-cilastatin without cross-reactivity to meropenem. This suggests that if carbapenem therapy is unavoidable, meropenem may be cautiously administered in patients with a known allergy to imipenem-cilastatin.

Hydrochlorothiazide-induced angioedema in a patient allergic to sulfonamide antibiotics: Evidence from a case report and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving sulfonamide antibiotics have been frequently documented in the literature, but cross-reactivity with sulfonamide non-antibiotics rarely has been reported.

CASE SUMMARY

An 82-year-old woman with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim resulting in angioedema and rash presented to the emergency department (ED) with angioedema and severe dysphagia, shortness of breath, and rash after receiving valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) for 4 months. Valsartan was identified as the most likely cause of the symptoms and was discontinued; however, the patient continued to have weekly episodes of angioedema and eventually returned to the ED. HCTZ was discontinued at the second ED visit, and the angioedema disappeared. However, it reappeared after reinitiation of HCTZ, and the patient returned to the ED again; this time with more severe symptoms. After the third ED visit and second hospitalization, HCTZ was permanently discontinued, and the angioedema has not returned. HCTZ was the definite cause of angioedema in this patient based on a score of 9 on the 10-point Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the probability of true cross-reactivity is not known, clinicians should be aware that an allergic-like reaction to sulfonamide-containing non-antibiotics may occur in patients with known allergies to sulfonamide-containing antibiotics. These patients should be monitored closely when receiving these drugs. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether angioedema should be added to the list of adverse events associated with HCTZ.

Sulfonamide allergies and outcomes related to use of potentially cross-reactive drugs in hospitalized patients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To characterize patient-reported sulfonamide allergies, assess the influence of these allergies on drug prescribing practices, and determine the frequency and nature of adverse reactions in patients with sulfonamide allergies who receive potentially cross-reactive drugs.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

Ninety-four hospitalized adult patients with reported sulfonamide allergies.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were followed during their hospital stay to document prescribing of and adverse reactions to sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfonamide nonantibiotics. Allergy characteristics and prescribing of sulfonamide-containing drugs were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) allergy was reported by 42 patients (45%), whereas 42 patients (45%) did not recall the drug to which they were allergic. Fifty-nine patients (63%) reported the allergy's physical manifestation as rash, 13 (14%) anaphylaxis, and 2 (2)% Stevens-Johnson's syndrome. Median time since last reported allergic reaction to a sulfonamide-containing agent was 20 years. Forty patients (43%) had been taking a sulfonamide nonantibiotic as an outpatient for an average of 6.2 years; 24 (60%) of those patients took furosemide. Sixteen (40%) of the patients receiving sulfonamide nonantibiotics reported an allergy to TMP-SMX. Nine patients (10%) with no past sulfonamide nonantibiotic use received a sulfonamide nonantibiotic as an inpatient, with furosemide most commonly prescribed. No adverse events were reported before admission or observed during the inpatient stay (range 2-23 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient and outpatient use of potentially cross-reactive drugs was observed in 52% of patients, although numerous patients were unable to give an accurate allergy history. No adverse effects were reported or documented with outpatient or inpatient sulfonamide nonantibiotic use, even among patients with histories of life-threatening reactions to sulfonamides.

Difference in risks of allergic reaction to sulfonamide drugs based on chemical structure

BACKGROUND

The chemical structure of sulfonamide antibiotics and sulfonamide nonantibiotics can affect the potential for adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether differences in chemical structure of the various sulfonamide drugs influence the risk of allergic events.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) using data from the General Practice Research Database. Cases were defined as patients with a diagnosis of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction. The date of the last event was the index date. Controls were matched on practice, type of DM, and index date. Current use of sulfonamides was defined as use in a 14 day time window before the index date. Sulfonamides were classified according to the presence/absence of an N1 substituent (N1(+)/(-)) and/or an arylamine (N4(+)/(-)). Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate strength of association and expressed as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Overall, current use of N1(+) N4(+) sulfonamide drugs was associated with the outcome (adjusted OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.40 to 9.81). Current use of N1(+) N4(-) and N1(-) N4(-) sulfonamide drugs was also associated with the occurrence of allergic reactions, although not as strongly: adjusted OR 2.48 (95% CI 2.12 to 2.89) and 2.07 (95% CI 1.74 to 2.46), respectively. Sex and age seemed to be effect modifiers. There was no clear evidence for effect modification by immune disease state.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we did not identify major differences between the groups, we believe that this approach is an innovative manner to examine adverse drug reactions by using chemical structure instead of therapeutic drug classes to classify exposure.

Platinum-Based Catalysts for the Hydroamination of Olefins with Sulfonamides and Weakly Basic Anilines

Electrophilic Pt(II) complexes catalyze efficient hydroaminations of olefins by sulfonamides and weakly basic anilines. Catalysts include the structurally characterized complex (COD)Pt(OTf)2 (1) and the known dimer [PtCl2(C2H4)]2, activated by AgBF4. Experiments with substituted anilines establish an empirical pKa cutoff (conjugate acid pKa < 1) for the participation of nitrogen-containing substrates in this catalysis. Arylsulfonamides (conjugate acid pKa approximately -6) with various para substituents hydroaminate olefins such as cyclohexene in yields greater than 95% at 90 degrees C. Hydroamination of propylene by p-toluenesulfonamide proceeds with Markovnikov selectivity, suggesting a mechanism that involves olefin activation at Pt. With norbornene and p-toluenesulfonamide as the substrates and 1 as the catalyst, intermediate [(COD)Pt(norbornene)2][OTf]2 (3) was identified and characterized by 19F and 195Pt NMR spectroscopies and mass spectrometry. Kinetic studies provide the empirical rate law, rate = k(obs)[Pt][sulfonamide], and are consistent with a mechanism in which attack of a sulfonamide on the Pt-coordinated olefin is the rate-determining step.