A comparison of on-line hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective clinical study

Performance evaluation of developed polysulfone membrane hemodiafilters, ABH-F and ABH-P, in post- and pre-dilution hemodiafiltration

ABH-F and ABH-P have been developed for hemodiafiltration (HDF) therapy. In this study, we evaluated the solute removal characteristics of the hemodiafilters in a bovine blood in vitro study. The hemodiafilters were examined for 120 min at various filtration flow rates (Q F) (31.2-250 mL/min) under a constant blood flow rate of 250 mL/min and constant dialysate flow rates of 500/250 mL/min in pre-dilution HDF (pre-HDF) and post-dilution HDF (post-HDF). Creatinine clearance in pre-HDF was approximately 85% of that in post-HDF because it was removed by molecular diffusion dominantly. The initial clearances of β2-microglobulin and α1-microglobulin increased with Q F and these values slightly and steeply decreased with time due to membrane fouling. Under a same Q F of 62.5 mL/min, higher clearance values in post-HDF were obtained compared with those in pre-HDF. All clearance values of ABH-P were higher than those of ABH-F under the same Q F. It seems that the ABH-P has a larger pore size of membrane than that in ABH-F. The creatinine and α1-microglobulin clearance values were obtained as highest at post-Q F62.5, the β2-microglobulin clearance values and transmembrane pressure were obtained as highest at pre-Q F250. Large solute clearances such as α1-microglobulin and albumin decreased with time in all HDF experiments. Time decay of large solute clearance values was observed in the HDF modality that had a higher clearance of the solute at 5 min later after the start of experiment.

Haemodiafiltration, haemofiltration and haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Convective dialysis modalities (haemofiltration (HF), haemodiafiltration (HDF), and acetate-free biofiltration (AFB)) removed excess body fluid across the dialysis membrane with positive pressure and accumulated middle- and larger-size accumulated solutes more efficiently than haemodialysis (HD). This increased larger solute removal combined with use of ultra-pure dialysis fluid in convective dialysis is hypothesised to reduce the frequency and severity of symptoms during dialysis as well as improve clinical outcomes. Convective dialysis therapies (HDF and HF) are associated with lower mortality compared to diffusive therapy (HD) in observational studies. This is an update of a review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To compare convective (HF, HDF, or AFB) with diffusive (HD) dialysis modalities on clinical outcomes (mortality, major cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and treatment-related adverse events) in men and women with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register (to 18 February 2015) through contact with a Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing convective therapy (HF, HDF, AFB) with another convective therapy or diffusive therapy (HD) for treatment of ESKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent authors identified studies, extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. We summarised treatment effects using the random effects model. We reported results as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous data together with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed for heterogeneity using the Chi(2) test and explored the amount of variation in treatment estimates beyond that expected by chance using the I(2) statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies comprising 667 participants were included in the 2006 review. In that review, there was insufficient evidence of treatment effects on major clinical outcomes to draw clinically meaningful conclusions. Searching to February 2015 identified 40 eligible studies comprising 3483 participants overall. In total, 35 studies (4039 participants) compared HF, HDF or AFB with HD, three studies (54 participants) compared AFB with HDF, and three studies (129 participants) compared HDF with HF.Risks of bias in all studies were generally high resulting in low confidence in estimated treatment effects. Convective dialysis had no significant effect on all-cause mortality (11 studies, 3396 participants: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05; I(2) = 34%), but significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (6 studies, 2889 participants: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; I(2) = 0%). One study reported no significant effect on rates of nonfatal cardiovascular events (714 participants: RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.50) and two studies showed no significant difference in hospitalisation (2 studies, 1688 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.63; I(2) = 0%). One study reported rates of hypotension during dialysis were significantly reduced with convective therapy (906 participants: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.80). Adverse events were not systematically evaluated in most studies and data for health-related quality of life were sparse. Convective therapies significantly reduced predialysis levels of B2 microglobulin (12 studies, 1813 participants: MD -5.55 mg/dL, 95% CI -9.11 to -1.98; I(2) = 94%) and increased dialysis dose (Kt/V urea) (14 studies, 2022 participants: MD 0.07, 95% CI -0.00 to 0.14; I(2) = 90%) compared to diffusive therapy, but results across studies were very heterogeneous. Sensitivity analyses limited to studies comparing HDF with HD showed very similar results. Directly comparative data for differing types of convective dialysis were insufficient to draw conclusions.Studies had important risks of bias leading to low confidence in the summary estimates and were generally limited to patients who had adequate dialysis vascular access.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Convective dialysis may reduce cardiovascular but not all-cause mortality and effects on nonfatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation are inconclusive. However, any treatment benefits of convective dialysis on all patient outcomes including cardiovascular death are unreliable due to limitations in study methods and reporting. Future studies which assess treatment effects of convection dose on patient outcomes including mortality and cardiovascular events would be informative.

Optimal convection volume for improving patient outcomes in an international incident dialysis cohort treated with online hemodiafiltration

Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), the most efficient renal replacement therapy, enables enhanced removal of small and large uremic toxins by combining diffusive and convective solute transport. Randomized controlled trials on prevalent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients showed improved patient survival with high-volume OL-HDF, underlining the effect of convection volume (CV). This retrospective international study was conducted in a large cohort of incident CKD patients to determine the CV threshold and range associated with survival advantage. Data were extracted from a cohort of adult CKD patients treated by post-dilution OL-HDF over a 101-month period. In total, 2293 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were analyzed using advanced statistical tools, including cubic spline analyses for determination of the CV range over which a survival increase was observed. The relative survival rate of OL-HDF patients, adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, vascular access, albumin, C-reactive protein, and dialysis dose, was found to increase at about 55 l/week of CV and to stay increased up to about 75 l/week. Similar analysis of pre-dialysis β2-microglobin (marker of middle-molecule uremic toxins) concentrations found a nearly linear decrease in marker concentration as CV increased from 40 to 75 l/week. Analysis of log C-reactive protein levels showed a decrease over the same CV range. Thus, a convection dose target based on convection volume should be considered and needs to be confirmed by prospective trials as a new determinant of dialysis adequacy.

Effect of On-Line Hemodiafiltration on P-Wave Dispersion in Children

P-wave dispersion (PWD) (difference between the maximum and minimum P-wave duration), has been proposed as a useful predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The consequences of hemodialysis (HD) on PWD and P-wave duration have not been unequivocally documented and understood, and may be complex. We aimed in this work to demonstrate the effects of online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) on the risk of developing AF through assessment of PWD. Thirty-three pediatric patients (14 males and 19 females with mean age of 11.66 ± 2.93 years) on conventional HD for at least 6 months underwent echocardiography, 12-lead electrocardiogram and PWD calculation. Then they were switched to OL-HDF for another 6 months and same parameters were reassessed. Thirty sex- and aged-matched healthy children, served as controls. PWD significantly decreased upon switching to OL-HDF (P < 0.001) and fractional shortening significantly improved (P < 0.001). Mean PWD of controls (24 ± 6 ms) was significantly less than PWD before and after OL-HDF (P < 0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Online HDF significantly decreased PWD and hence also the potential of AF development, which may invite a higher consideration of this renal replacement modality in a pediatric population.

Influence of dialysis modality and membrane flux on insomnia severity in haemodialysis patients

AIM

Insomnia is an important problem in dialysis patients. A greater prevalence of insomnia in chronic kidney disease compared with non-renal patients suggests a role for uraemic toxins in contributing to insomnia. The aim of this study was to examine if dialysis modality and membrane permeability is associated with the frequency and severity of insomnia in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

In our cross-sectional study, we evaluated 122 patients who were divided into three groups: on-line haemodiafiltration, high flux haemodialysis and low flux haemodialysis. The frequency and severity of insomnia was evaluated with the Insomnia Severity Index.

RESULTS

Insomnia was present in 47.5% of all patients. The majority of patients who reported insomnia were receiving low flux haemodialysis (80%), followed by patients on high flux haemodialysis (43.6%) and haemodiafiltration (20.9%). Patients using low flux membranes, had a significantly higher Insomnia Severity Index (11.9 ± 6.6) compared with patients receiving high flux haemodialysis (6.8 ± 6.3) and haemodiafiltration (5.2 ± 7.0). The insomnia severity index did not differ between patients receiving high flux haemodialysis compared with on-line haemodiafiltration.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that different haemodialysis modalities are associated with insomnia and suggests a potential benefit of using high flux membranes.

Principles and operational parameters to optimize poison removal with extracorporeal treatments

A role for nephrologists in the management of a poisoned patient involves evaluating the indications for, and methods of, enhancing the elimination of a poison. Nephrologists are familiar with the various extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) used in the management of impaired kidney function, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. However, these same skills and knowledge may not always be considered, or applicable, when prescribing ECTR for the treatment of a poisoned patient. Maximizing solute elimination is a key aim of such treatments, perhaps more so than in the treatment of uremia, because ECTR has the potential to reverse clinical toxicity and shorten the duration of poisoning. This manuscript reviews the various principles that govern poison elimination by ECTR (diffusion, convection, adsorption, and centrifugation) and how components of the ECTR can be adjusted to maximize clearance. Data supporting these recommendations will be presented, whenever available.

Resistance to erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients treated with online hemodiafiltration and ultrapure low-flux hemodialysis: results from a randomized controlled trial (CONTRAST)

Resistance to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) is common in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD) treatment. ESA responsiveness might be improved by enhanced clearance of uremic toxins of middle molecular weight, as can be obtained by hemodiafiltration (HDF). In this analysis of the randomized controlled CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST; NCT00205556), the effect of online HDF on ESA resistance and iron parameters was studied. This was a pre-specified secondary endpoint of the main trial. A 12 months' analysis of 714 patients randomized to either treatment with online post-dilution HDF or continuation of low-flux HD was performed. Both groups were treated with ultrapure dialysis fluids. ESA resistance, measured every three months, was expressed as the ESA index (weight adjusted weekly ESA dose in daily defined doses [DDD]/hematocrit). The mean ESA index during 12 months was not different between patients treated with HDF or HD (mean difference HDF versus HD over time 0.029 DDD/kg/Hct/week [−0.024 to 0.081]; P = 0.29). Mean transferrin saturation ratio and ferritin levels during the study tended to be lower in patients treated with HDF (−2.52% [−4.72 to −0.31]; P = 0.02 and −49 ng/mL [−103 to 4]; P = 0.06 respectively), although there was a trend for those patients to receive slightly more iron supplementation (7.1 mg/week [−0.4 to 14.5]; P = 0.06).

In conclusion, compared to low-flux HD with ultrapure dialysis fluid, treatment with online HDF did not result in a decrease in ESA resistance.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00205556

A stepwise approach for the management of poisoning with extracorporeal treatments

The use of an extracorporeal treatment (ECTR) in a poisoned patient may be life-saving in a limited number of scenarios. The decision-processes surrounding the use of ECTR in poisoning is complex: most nephrologists are not trained to assess a poisoned patient while clinical toxicologists rarely prescribe ECTRs. Deciding on which ECTR is most appropriate for a poison requires a good understanding of the poison's physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Further, a detailed understanding of the capabilities and limitations of the different ECTRs can be useful to select the most appropriate ECTR for a given clinical situation. This manuscript provides a stepwise approach to assess the usefulness of ECTRs in poisoning.

Available extracorporeal treatments for poisoning: overview and limitations

Poisoning is a significant public health problem. In severe cases, extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) may be required to prevent or reverse major toxicity. Available ECTRs include intermittent hemodialysis, sustained low-efficiency dialysis, intermittent hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration, continuous renal replacement therapy, hemoperfusion, therapeutic plasma exchange, exchange transfusion, peritoneal dialysis, albumin dialysis, cerebrospinal fluid exchange, and extracorporeal life support. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of the technical aspects, as well as the potential indications and limitations of the different ECTRs used for poisoned patients.

High-efficiency on-line haemodiafiltration improves conduit artery endothelial function compared with high-flux haemodialysis in end-stage renal disease patients

BACKGROUND

Middle molecular weight uraemic toxins are considered to play an important role in vascular dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Recent dialysis techniques based on convection, specifically high-efficiency on-line haemodiafiltration (HDF), enhance the removal of middle molecular weight toxins and reduce all-cause mortality in haemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the mechanisms of these improved outcomes remain to be established.

METHODS

This prospective study randomly assigned 42 ESRD patients to switch from high-flux HD to high-efficiency on-line HDF (n=22) or to continue HD (n=20). Brachial artery endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilatation, central pulse pressure, carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), internal diastolic diameter and distensibility and circulating markers of uraemia, inflammation and oxidative stress were blindly assessed before and after a 4-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Brachial flow-mediated dilatation and carotid artery distensibility increased significantly in the HDF group compared with HD, while carotid IMT and diameter remained similar. HDF decreased predialysis levels of the uraemic toxins β2-microglobulin, phosphate and blood TNFα mRNA expression. Oxidative stress markers were not different between the HD and HDF groups. Blood mRNA expression of protein kinase C β2, an endothelial NO-synthase (eNOS) inhibitor, decreased significantly with HDF.

CONCLUSIONS

High-efficiency on-line HDF prevents the endothelial dysfunction and stiffening of the conduit arteries in ESRD patients compared with high-flux HD. HDF decreases uraemic toxins, vascular inflammation, and is associated with subsequent improvement in eNOS functionality. These results suggest that reduced endothelial dysfunction may be an intermediate mechanism explaining the beneficial outcomes associated with HDF.

Engineering perspective on the evolution of push/pull-based dialysis treatments

The incidence of kidney disease is rapidly increasing worldwide, and techniques and devices for treating end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have been evolving. Better outcomes achieved by convective treatment have encouraged the use of synthetic membranes with high water permeability in clinical setups, and high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) are now preferred forms of convective therapy in ESRD patients. Push/pull-based dialysis strategies have also been examined to increase convective mass transfer in ESRD patients. The push/pull technique uses the entire membrane as a forward filtration domain for a period of time. However, backfiltration must accompany the forward filtration to compensate for the fluid depletion resulting from the forward filtration, making it necessary to switch the membranes to a backfiltration domain. This paper attempts to describe the advancement of push/pull-based renal supportive treatments in terms of their technical description, hemodialytic efficacy including fluid management accuracy and applicability for clinical use. How the optimization of push and pull actions could translate into better convective efficiency will also be discussed in depth.

Monitoring of hemodialysis quality-of-care indicators: why is it important?

BACKGROUND

Meeting specific guideline targets is associated with improved survival rates and reduced hospitalizations in the dialysis population. This prospective work evaluated the adequacy of hemodialysis quality indicators in an in-center hemodialysis population with severe comorbidities, and assessed whether clinical practice could impact intermediate outcomes.

METHODS

All the chronic hemodialysis patients treated in Rouen University Hospital hemodialysis Unit between January 2009 and April 2010 were included in this observational study. Every quarter, mean levels and prevalence of conformity were collected for the following indicators: anemia, dialysis dose, serum calcium and phosphorus, PTH, 25OH-vitamin D, albumin, serum bicarbonate, LDL-cholesterol, serum β2-microglobulin, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, intradialytic hypotension and vascular access. Conformity of quality-of-care indicators was determined according to targets defined by international guidelines, whenever available.

RESULTS

Altogether, 124 patients were included in the study. Thirty-three patients were evaluated during the entire follow-up period. An improvement in the percentage of conformity was observed for hemoglobin, dialysis dose, phosphates, PTH, serum bicarbonate and β2-microglobulin in the global population. Failure to improve conformity rates for several indicators, including serum albumin, was found, possibly depending on patients' comorbidities rather than on quality of care.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this study shows that following quality-of-care indicators can improve clinical practice by identifying center-specific weaknesses, prompting the establishment of corrective measures. Finally, we suggest that the definition and targets of some indicators, especially hypertension and LDL-cholesterol, be reviewed, since evidence of their association with mortality is not demonstrated.

Postdialysis serum sodium changes and systolic blood pressure in patients undergoing online hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis

Background

Because hemodiafiltration (HDF) involves large amounts of ultra-filtration and substitution fluid infusion, its effects on serum electrolytes may be different from those of hemodialysis (HD). Serum sodium and blood pressures were compared between patients undergoing online HDF and high-flux HD (HFHD).

Methods

Thirty-two of 101 patients on HFHD switched voluntarily to online HDF. Their pre- and postdialysis serum measurements were compared with those of the remaining 69 HFHD patients.

Results

Online HDF patients had lower pre- and postdialysis systolic blood pressures (SBPs) than HFHD patients (predialysis, 136±21 vs. 145±19 mmHg, P<0.05; postdialysis, 129±22 vs. 142±25 mmHg, P<0.05). Pre- and postdialysis serum sodium concentrations were not significantly different between online HDF and HFHD (predialysis, 138±2 vs. 137±3 mEq/L; postdialysis, 134±2 vs. 134±2 mEq/L). However, the change in serum sodium concentration after dialysis was greater in online HDF than HFHD patients (−3.7±2.2 vs. −2.5±2.8 mEq/L, P<0.05). The change in serum sodium concentration was correlated with postdialysis SBP (r=0.304, P<0.005) and pulse pressure (r=0.299, P<0.005). Predialysis SBP (r = 0.317, P<0.005) and pulse pressure (r=0.324, P=0.001) were also correlated with the postdialysis serum sodium change.

Conclusion

Compared with HFHD, online HDF has a greater serum sodium lowering effect. This might contribute to the ability of online HDF to stabilize both pre- and postdialysis SBP.

A zebrafish model for uremic toxicity: role of the complement pathway

Many organic solutes accumulate in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and some are poorly removed with urea-based prescriptions for hemodialysis. However, their toxicities have been difficult to assess. We have employed an animal model, the zebrafish embryo, to test the toxicity of uremic serum compared to control. Serum was obtained from stable ESRD patients predialysis or from normal subjects. Zebrafish embryos 24 h postfertilization were exposed to experimental media at a water:human serum ratio of 3:1. Those exposed to serum from uremic subjects had significantly reduced survival at 8 h (19 ± 18 vs. 94 ± 6%, p < 0.05, uremic serum vs. control, respectively). Embryos exposed to serum from ESRD subjects fractionated at 50 kDa showed significantly greater toxicity with the larger molecular weight fraction (83 ± 11 vs. 7 ± 17% survival, p < 0.05, <50 vs. >50 kDa, respectively). Heating serum abrogated its toxicity. EDTA, a potent inhibitor of complement by virtue of calcium chelation, reduced the toxicity of uremic serum compared to untreated uremic serum (96 ± 5 vs. 28 ± 20% survival, p < 0.016, chelated vs. nonchelated serum, respectively). Anti-factor B, a specific inhibitor of the alternative complement pathway, reduced the toxicity of uremic serum, compared to untreated uremic serum (98 ± 6 vs. 3 ± 9% survival, p < 0.016, anti-factor B treated vs. nontreated, respectively). Uremic serum is thus more toxic to zebrafish embryos than normal serum. Furthermore, this toxicity is associated with a fraction of large size, is inactivated by heat, and is reduced by both specific and nonspecific inhibitors of complement activation. Together these data lend support to the hypothesis that at least some uremic toxicities may be mediated by complement.

Effects of hemodiafiltration and high flux hemodialysis on nerve excitability in end-stage kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral neuropathy is the most common neurological complication in end-stage kidney disease. While high flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) have become the preferred options for extracorporeal dialysis therapy, the effects of these treatments on nerve excitability have not yet been examined.

METHODS

An observational proof-of-concept study of nerve excitability and neuropathy was undertaken in an incident dialysis population (n = 17) receiving either HFHD or HDF. Nerve excitability techniques were utilised to assess nerve ion channel function and membrane potential, in conjunction with clinical assessment and standard nerve conduction studies. A mathematical model of axonal excitability was used to investigate the underlying basis of the observed changes. Nerve excitability was recorded from the median nerve, before, during and after a single dialysis session and correlated with corresponding biochemical markers. Differences in nerve excitability were compared to normal controls with longitudinal follow-up over an 18 month period.

RESULTS

Nerve excitability was performed in patient cohorts treated with either HFHD (n = 9) or online HDF (n = 8), with similar neuropathy status. Nerve excitability measures in HDF-treated patients were significantly closer to normal values compared to HFHD patients obtained over the course of a dialysis session (p<0.05). Longitudinal studies revealed stability of nerve excitability findings, and thus maintenance of improved nerve function in the HDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has provided evidence that nerve excitability in HDF-treated patients is significantly closer to normal values prior to dialysis, across a single dialysis session and at longitudinal follow-up. These findings offer promise for the management of neuropathy in ESKD and should be confirmed in randomised trials.

High-efficiency postdilution online hemodiafiltration reduces all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients

Retrospective studies suggest that online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) may reduce the risk of mortality compared with standard hemodialysis in patients with ESRD. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which we assigned 906 chronic hemodialysis patients either to continue hemodialysis (n=450) or to switch to high-efficiency postdilution OL-HDF (n=456). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, treatment tolerability, and laboratory data. Compared with patients who continued on hemodialysis, those assigned to OL-HDF had a 30% lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.53-0.92; P=0.01), a 33% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.02; P=0.06), and a 55% lower risk of infection-related mortality (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21-0.96; P=0.03). The estimated number needed to treat suggested that switching eight patients from hemodialysis to OL-HDF may prevent one annual death. The incidence rates of dialysis sessions complicated by hypotension and of all-cause hospitalization were lower in patients assigned to OL-HDF. In conclusion, high-efficiency postdilution OL-HDF reduces all-cause mortality compared with conventional hemodialysis.

Variation of clinical and laboratory features in chronic dialysis patients treated with high-flux hemodialysis after switching to online hemodiafiltration

PURPOSE

The study of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) benefits over high-flux hemodialysis (HD) raises great interest. The purpose was to compare clinical and laboratory parameters in patients treated with HD who were switched to HDF.

METHODS

Forty-eight HD patients (study group) were switched to HDF, while other 521 patients remained on HD as a control group. During last 6 HD months and during first year of HDF, we determined in both groups the following parameters: monthly-weekly dialysis time, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), interdialytic body weight gain (IBWG), blood flow rate (Qb), weekly erythropoietin-stimulating agents dose (EPO), single-pool Kt/V, calcium, phosphorus (P), hemoglobin and normalized protein catabolic ration (nPCR), plus every 3 months--albumin, parathormone (PTH), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT). In both groups, parameters in the last 6 HD months were compared to those in the first 6 months and, respectively, to those in the first year of HDF.

RESULTS

In the study group, albumin and nPCR were significantly higher in the HD period not only compared to the first 6 months of HDF, but also compared to the first year of HDF. IBWG and P were higher with HD compared to the first year of HDF, but not with the first 6 months. PTH, Kt/V, Qb and EPO were higher in both HDF periods. In the control group, albumin was significantly higher in the first 6 months after the switch, but it was significantly lower in the first year. BMI, ferritin, PTH, Kt/V, Qb, TSAT and weekly dialysis time were higher in both HDF periods, while nPCR, EPO, SBP and DBP were lower. IBWG and Hb rose only during the first year after the switch, while P was lower in the first year, but not in the first 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrition, assessed by albumin, nPCR and BMI, was not improved by HDF compared to HD. With HDF, Kt/V and phosphorus control were better, similar results were observed in the control group. A larger EPO dose was needed with HDF for maintaining a similar hemoglobin level.

Comparison of toxin removal outcomes in online hemodiafiltration and intra-dialytic exercise in high-flux hemodialysis: a prospective randomized open-label clinical study protocol

Background

Maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients universally suffer from excess toxin load. Hemodiafiltration (HDF) has shown its potential in better removal of small as well as large sized toxins, but its efficacy is restricted by inter-compartmental clearance. Intra-dialytic exercise on the other hand is also found to be effective for removal of toxins; the augmented removal is apparently obtained by better perfusion of skeletal muscles and decreased inter-compartmental resistance. The aim of this trial is to compare the toxin removal outcome associated with intra-dialytic exercise in HD and with post-dilution HDF.

Methods/design

The main hypothesis of this study is that intra-dialytic exercise enhances toxin removal by decreasing the inter-compartmental resistance, a major impediment for toxin removal. To compare the HDF and HD with exercise, the toxin rebound for urea, creatinine, phosphate, and β₂-microglobulin will be calculated after 2 hours of dialysis. Spent dialysate will also be collected to calculate the removed toxin mass. To quantify the decrease in inter-compartmental resistance, the recently developed regional blood flow model will be employed. The study will be single center, randomized, self-control, open-label prospective clinical research where 15 study subjects will undergo three dialysis protocols (a) high flux HD, (b) post-dilution HDF, (c) high flux HD with exercise. Multiple blood samples during each study session will be collected to estimate the unknown model parameters.

Discussion

This will be the first study to investigate the exercise induced physiological change(s) responsible for enhanced toxin removal, and compare the toxin removal outcome both for small and middle sized toxins in HD with exercise and HDF. Successful completion of this clinical research will give important insights into exercise effect on factors responsible for enhanced toxin removal. The knowledge will give confidence for implementing, sustaining, and optimizing the exercise in routine dialysis care. We anticipate that toxin removal outcomes from intra-dialytic exercise session will be comparable to that obtained by standalone HDF. These results will encourage clinicians to combine HDF with intra-dialytic exercise for significantly enhanced toxin removal.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01674153

Effect of hemodiafiltration on quality of life over time

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is unclear if hemodiafiltration leads to a better quality of life compared with hemodialysis. It was, therefore, the aim of this study to assess the effect of hemodiafiltration on quality of life compared with hemodialysis in patients with ESRD.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This study analyzed the data of 714 patients with a median follow-up of 2 years from the Convective Transport Study. The patients were enrolled between June of 2004 and December of 2009. The Convective Transport Study is a randomized controlled trial on the effect of online hemodiafiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis on all-cause mortality. Quality of life was assessed with the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form. This questionnaire provides data for a physical and mental composite score and describes kidney disease-specific quality of life in 12 domains. The domains have scales from 0 to 100.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in changes in health-related quality of life over time between patients treated with hemodialysis (n=358) or hemodiafiltration (n=356). The quality of life domain patient satisfaction declined over time in both dialysis modalities (hemodialysis: -2.5/yr, -3.4 to -1.5, P<0.001; hemodiafiltration: -1.4/yr, -2.4 to -0.5, P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration had no significant effect on quality of life over time.

High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines regarding the use of high-flux haemodialysis membranes vary widely.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyse the current evidence reported for the benefits and harms of high-flux and low-flux haemodialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (July 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1948 to March 2011), and EMBASE (1947 to March 2011) without language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared high-flux haemodialysis with low-flux haemodialysis in people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who required long-term haemodialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two authors for study characteristics (participants and interventions), risks of bias, and outcomes (all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality, hospitalisation, health-related quality of life, carpal tunnel syndrome, dialysis-related arthropathy, kidney function, and symptoms) among people on haemodialysis. Treatment effects were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 33 studies that involved 3820 participants with ESKD. High-flux membranes reduced cardiovascular mortality (5 studies, 2612 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99) but not all-cause mortality (10 studies, 2915 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.04) or infection-related mortality (3 studies, 2547 participants: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.14). In absolute terms, high-flux membranes may prevent three cardiovascular deaths in 100 people treated with haemodialysis for two years. While high-flux membranes reduced predialysis beta-2 microglobulin levels (MD -12.17 mg/L, 95% CI -15.83 to -8.51 mg/L), insufficient data were available to reliably estimate the effects of membrane flux on hospitalisation, carpal tunnel syndrome, or amyloid-related arthropathy. Evidence for effects of high-flux membranes was limited by selective reporting in a few studies. Insufficient numbers of studies limited our ability to conduct subgroup analyses for membrane type, biocompatibility, or reuse. In general, the risk of bias was either high or unclear in the majority of studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

High-flux haemodialysis may reduce cardiovascular mortality in people requiring haemodialysis by about 15%. A large well-designed RCT is now required to confirm this finding.

Survey of depression by Beck Depression Inventory in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

High prevalence of depression has been reported in patients with end stage kidney disease and depression is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of depression in patients receiving standard hemodialysis (SHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) and compare the associated factors between these treatment modalities. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to survey for major depressive symptoms. Demographic and biochemical data were reviewed and collected. Point prevalence of depression in HDF patients was significantly lower than SHD patients (23.9% vs. 43.1%, P < 0.05). The BDI score was also higher in SHD than HDF group (13.2 ± 11.6 vs. 8.7 ± 11.2, P < 0.05). SHD patients with major depressive symptoms had significantly lower levels of hemoglobin, albumin, creatinine, sodium and hand grip strength but had higher prevalence of diabetes and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels. In HDF patients, phosphorus level was significantly lower in patients with major depressive symptoms. Logistic regression analysis revealed that hs-CRP, serum sodium and hand grip strength were significantly associated with major depressive symptoms in patients treated with SHD; while serum phosphorus was identified in HDF groups. We concluded that prevalence of depression was high in dialysis patients. Patients receiving HDF had a lower mean BDI score and a nearly 50% lower prevalence rate of major depressive symptoms than that of SHD. Factors associated with depression were different between two modalities.

Predictors of haemoglobin levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients treated with low-flux haemodialysis, haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration: results of a multicentre randomized and controlled trial

Background

Predictors of haemoglobin (Hb) levels and resistance to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in dialysis patients have not yet been clearly defined. Some mainly uncontrolled studies suggest that online haemodiafiltration (HDF) may have a beneficial effect on Hb, whereas no data are available concerning online haemofiltration (HF). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of convective treatments (CTs) on Hb levels and ESA resistance in comparison with low-flux haemodialysis (HD) and to evaluate the predictors of these outcomes.

Methods

Primary multivariate analysis was made of a pre-specified secondary outcome of a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled study in which 146 chronic HD patients from 27 Italian centres were randomly assigned to HD (70 patients) or CTs: online pre-dilution HF (36 patients) or online pre-dilution HDF (40 patients).

Results

CTs did not affect Hb levels (P = 0.596) or ESA resistance (P = 0.984). Hb correlated with polycystic kidney disease (P = 0.001), C-reactive protein (P = 0.025), ferritin (P = 0.018), ESA dose (P < 0.001) and total cholesterol (P = 0.021). The participating centres were the main source of Hb variability (partial eta² 0.313, P < 0.001). ESA resistance directly correlated with serum ferritin (P = 0.030) and beta2 microglobulin (P = 0.065); participating centres were again a major source of variance (partial eta² 0.367, P < 0.001). Transferrin saturation did not predict either outcome variables (P = 0.277 and P = 0.170).

Conclusions

In comparison with low-flux HD, CTs did not significantly improve Hb levels or ESA resistance. The main sources of variability were participating centres, ESA dose and the underlying disease.

Influence of dialysis modality and membrane flux on quality of life in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis is significantly disturbed. There are data that hemodiafiltration (HDF) may be more effective than conventional hemodialysis in the removal of uremic toxins and may reduce frequency and severity of intradialytic and postdialysis adverse symptoms in patients. Also, some researchers suggest advantages of using high-flux membranes compared with low-flux.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether hemodialysis modality and membrane flux, independent of membrane biocompatibility, make differences in quality of life in patients.

METHODS

In our cross-sectional study, we evaluated 124 patients who were divided, based on therapy, into three groups: online HDF, high-flux hemodialysis, and low-flux hemodialysis. Data were collected using the Short Form-36 questionnaire combined with special questionnaire, which included demographic and clinically related questions.

RESULTS

Health-related quality of life was better in patients on HDF compared with patients on hemodialysis, especially compared with low-flux hemodialysis patients in most of the scales and in both dimensions: physical component scale and mental component scale. There were no statistically significant differences in Short Form-36 domains between high-flux hemodialysis and low-flux hemodialysis.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the potential advantages of HDF with regard to influence on quality of life, which is sufficient to justify further research in prospective and longitudinal study design.

Hemodiafiltration improves plasma 25-hepcidin levels: a prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over study comparing hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

Background/Aims

Data from studies comparing the effect of hemodiafiltration (HDF) and conventional hemodialysis (HD) on clinically important outcomes are insufficient to support superiority of HDF. None of these studies has been participant-blinded.

Methods

We performed a prospective, randomized, and patient-blinded cross-over study. Twenty patients on chronic HD received either HD for 2 months followed by post-dilution HDF for 2 months or in opposite order. A range of clinical parameters, as well as markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and iron metabolism was measured.

Results

The two treatments were similar with respect to dialysis-related complications, quality of life, and the biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation. Compared to HD, 25-hepcidin and β₂-microglobulin were 38 and 32%, respectively, lower after 60 days of HDF (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). The consumption of ESA (erythropoietin-stimulating agent) and LMWH (low-molecular-weight heparin) was significantly higher with HDF.

Conclusion

In short term, HDF is not superior to HD regarding dialysis-related complications. The higher ESA consumption observed with HDF can be explained by blood clotting in tubing and dialyzers, as more anticoagulation was needed with post-dilution HDF. In a longer perspective, lowering serum hepcidin levels may improve pathological iron homeostasis.

Evaluation of a new method for pulse push/pull hemodialysis: comparison with conventional hemodialysis

The repetition of forward and backward filtration during hemodialysis (HD) increases convective mass transfer, and thus, the authors devised a method of achieving cyclic repletion of ultrafiltration and backfiltration. Hemodialytic efficiencies of the developed unit are described. The devised method, named pulse push/pull hemodialysis (PPPHD), is based on the utilization of dual pulsation in a dialysate stream. Clearances of solutes with different molecular weights were determined, and in vivo hemodialytic performance was investigated in a canine renal failure model. Urea and creatinine reduction and albumin (ALB) loss were monitored, and the results obtained were compared with those of a conventional high-flux hemodialysis (CHD). Dialysis sessions were repeated eight times for PPPHD and six times for CHD by alternating PPPHD and CHD sessions in a single animal, which remained stable throughout the experiments. Urea and creatinine reductions for the PPPHD unit were 49.2 ± 2% and 44.3 ± 3.3%, respectively, which were slightly higher than those obtained for the CHD. Total protein and ALB levels were preserved by both methods. However, in vitro results revealed that PPPHD achieved significantly greater inulin clearance than CHD. The developed PPPHD unit facilitates repetitive filtration and improves convective mass transfer during HD, without the need for external replacement infusion.

Subtherapeutic serum vancomycin concentrations during on-line hemodiafiltration

The aim of the study is to study vancomycin serum concentration changes during on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and determine whether administration of vancomycin during the last hour of OL-HDF provides therapeutic serum concentrations. Vancomycin was administered intravenously at a dose of 15 mg/kg to 17 chronic hemodialysis patients who were enrolled into two study groups (A and B). In group A patients (n = 11), vancomycin was administered immediately postdialysis. Forty-three hours later, a 4-hour OL-HDF session was performed. Blood samples (S) for vancomycin measurement were drawn before, during, and after the session. In group B patients (n = 6), vancomycin was administered during the last hour of a 4-hour OL-HDF session on Monday. Vancomycin serum concentrations were measured postdialysis, as well as before and after the next two dialysis sessions of the week. In group A patients, mean vancomycin concentrations were reduced by 50% (S(pre): 10.2 ± 1.4 μg/ml, S(post): 5.0 ± 0.9 μg/ml). Vancomycin dialysance was 74.6 ± 29.3 ml/min, while the volume of distribution was 0.42 L/kg. In group B patients, mean vancomycin concentrations before the beginning of Wednesday and Friday dialysis sessions were 3.1 ± 0.7 and 1.4 ± 0.4 μg/ml, respectively. Postdialysis administration of vancomycin followed by OL-HDF resulted in a 50% reduction of vancomycin serum concentrations. Administration during the last treatment hour of OL-HDF results in subtherapeutic vancomycin serum concentrations over the course of the subsequent inter- and intradialytic intervals.

A dual-chambered hemodialyzer for convection-enhanced hemodialysis

Convective clearance during hemodialysis (HD) improves dialysis outcomes in kidney failure patients, and, thus, trials have been undertaken to increase convective mass transfer, which is directly related to internal filtration rates. The authors designed a new hemodialyzer to increase the internal filtration rates, and here describe the hemodialytic efficacy of the devised unit. The developed dual-chambered hemodialyzer (DCH) contains two separate chambers for dialysate flow within a single housing. By placing a flow restrictor on the dialysate stream between these two chambers, dialysate pressures are regulated independently. Dialysate is maintained at a higher pressure than blood pressure in one chamber, and at a lower pressure in the other chamber. The dialysis performance of the DCH was investigated using an acute canine renal failure model. Urea and creatinine reductions and albumin loss were monitored, and forward and backward filtration rates were measured. No procedurally related malfunction was encountered, and animals remained stable without any complications. Urea and creatinine reductions after 4-h dialysis treatments were 75.2 ± 6.5% and 67.7 ± 8.9%, respectively. Post-treatment total protein and albumin levels remained at pretreatment values. Total filtration volume was 4.98 ± 0.5 L over 4 h, whereas the corresponding backfiltration (BF) volume was 4.77 ± 0.6 L. The developed dual-chamber dialyzer has the benefit of providing independent control of forward filtration and BF rates. HD using this dialyzer provides a straightforward means of increasing the internal filtration and convective dose.

Efficiency of Post-Dilution Hemodiafiltration with a High-Flux α-Polysulfone Dialyzer

Purpose

Intra-individual comparison of technical and clinical characteristics of two hemodiafiltration (HDF) strategies, namely, post-dilution HDF (post-HDF) with a high-flux α-polysulfone hemodiafilter and reverse mid-dilution HDF (MD-HDF).

Methods

Fifteen patients who were stable on RRT were randomly submitted to both HDF techniques under matched operational conditions. Removal of small and middle molecular compounds was compared. The pressure regimen within the dialyzers and the hydraulic and solute permeability indexes of the membrane were monitored on-line during the sessions.

Results

Urea removed was not statistically different between post-HDF and MD-HDF (41.7±10.2 vs. 39.9±8.2 g/session). High and comparable removal of phosphate (KDQ,132±30 vs. 138±21 ml/min) and middle molecules (β2-m KDQ, 79.1±6.1 vs. 74.1±13.5 ml/min) was shown in post-HDF and MD-HDF. Albumin leakage tended to be lower after post-HDF (914±370 vs. 1313±603 mg/session, p=0.075). There were no cases of blood circuit clotting, hypotensive episodes, or other clinical or technical problems. In post-HDF, a very high ultrafiltration rate (QUF, 7.4 l/h) and filtration fraction of 59% were maintained through the sessions with safe trans-membrane pressure (TMP) values strictly retained within the planned range (280–350 mmHg). Larger volume exchange (10 l/h) was obtained in MD-HDF, but the very high QUF established high and risky TMP in the post-dilution section of the MD 220 dialyzer.

Conclusions

The hemodiafilter tested in this study proved its high efficiency when used in post-dilution HDF with the application of an automatic ultrafiltration/pressure feedback, which guaranteed maximal convection within controlled hydraulic conditions.

Does online hemodiafiltration lead to reduction in trace elements and vitamins?

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been reported to improve nutritional intake, but as it increases convective losses, it could also increase micronutrient loss. We prospectively audited the effect of HDF on vitamin B12, zinc and selenium. Thirty-four patients dialyzing (T/Th/Sa) switched to HDF, and 44 dialyzing (M/W/F) remained on high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and were followed for 12 months. Dialysis adequacy, weight, hemoglobin, and serum albumin did not differ between the groups and did not change over 12 months' follow up. Similarly, vitamin B12 did not differ: HDF, 443 (325-682) ng/mL HD vs. 478 (327-690) ng/mL HDF; 6 months, 513 (351-664) ng/mL vs. 460 (379-647) ng/mL; or 12 months, 444 (317-617) ng/mL vs. 492 (323-644) ng/mL. And no patient had subnormal values. Folate levels, in those not taking supplements, were also stable (start, 6.2 ± 0.7 μg/L HD vs. 7.2 ± 1.0 μg/L HDF; 12 months, 6.5 ± 0.9 μg/L vs. 10.9 ± 2.4 μg/L). Serum zinc was subnormal in 50% prior to switching to HDF, 10.4 ± 0.4 μmol/L, but did not fall with HDF 10.2 ± 0.3 μmol/L; similarly, selenium was low in 49% prior to switching to HDF, 0.77 ± 0.06 μmol/L, but remained stable on HDF, 0.82 ± 0.06 μmol/L. Although HDF adds convective clearance to standard hemodialysis, it does not lead to a reduction in vitamin B12, folate, zinc, or selenium. However, half of this dialysis cohort had low levels of both zinc and selenium.

Development of a New Method for Pulse Push/Pull Hemodialysis

Although hemodiafiltration is presumed to be a gold standard for higher convective therapy for kidney failure patients, the repetition of forward and backward filtration during hemodialysis increases the total filtration volume and convective clearance. Hence, the authors describe a new method of enhancing forward filtration and backfiltration. The devised method, named pulse push/pull hemodialysis (PPPHD), is based on the utilization of dual pulsation in a dialysate stream; namely, pulsatile devices in the dialysate stream both upstream (a dialysate pump) and downstream (an effluent pump) of the dialyzer. Fluid management accuracy of the unit was assessed using fresh bovine blood, and its hemodialytic performance was investigated in a canine renal failure model. Forward filtration rates during PPPHD were maintained at the levels of dialysate flow rates. Fluid balancing error was less than ±0.84% of total dialysate volume, when 97.4 ± 1.66L of pure dialysate was circulated for 4 hs. The animal remained stable without any complication. Urea and creatinine reductions were 56.9 ± 1.6 and 52.8 ± 2.3%, respectively, and albumin levels remained uniform throughout treatment. The devised PPPHD unit offers a simple, but efficient strategy of combined simultaneous diffusive and convective solute transport for ESRD patients, without the need for external replacement infusion.

Online high-efficiency haemodiafiltration achieves higher serum free light chain removal than high-flux haemodialysis in multiple myeloma patients: preliminary quantitative study

BACKGROUND

Fast reduction of serum free light chain (FLC) levels correlate with renal recovery in cast nephropathy. Because convection has the capacity to remove proteins of higher molecular weights, we hypothesized that haemodiafiltration (HDF) would be superior to haemodialysis (HD) for FLC clearance.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all renal replacement therapy (RRT) sessions performed in multiple myeloma patients with pre- and post-treatment FLC measurements during a 2-year period. Using kinetic modelling, we calculated reduction percentages corrected for net ultrafiltration, effective clearances, net mass removal and Kt/V for both kappa (κ) and lambda (λ) serum FLC.

RESULTS

We analysed 27 (10 HD and 17 HDF) RRT sessions realized in a total of six subjects. HDF resulted in higher FLC removal rates when compared to HD. Moreover, high-efficiency (i.e. substitution volume > 15 L/session) HDF demonstrated median efficient FLC clearances roughly twice superior to high-flux HD for both κ (59.0 versus 33.8 mL/min, respectively; P < 0.01) and λ (40.5 versus 19.7 mL/min, respectively; P = 0.02) FLC. In post-dilution HDF treatments, corrected FLC reduction percentages positively correlated with substitution volumes. Total plasma proteins increased during RRT in the HDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary quantitative study demonstrates the superiority of high-efficiency HDF over high-flux HD for serum FLC removal in multiple myeloma patients on RRT. No negative impact on total plasma proteins was noted.