BRCA1/2 and TP53 mutation status associates with PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in ovarian cancer

Recent Findings in the Regulation of Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression

With the recent approvals for the application of monoclonal antibodies that target the well-characterized immune checkpoints, immune therapy shows great potential against both solid and hematologic tumors. The use of these therapeutic monoclonal antibodies elicits inspiring clinical results with durable objective responses and improvements in overall survival. Agents targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1; also known as PDCD1) and its ligand (PD-L1) achieve a great success in immune checkpoints therapy. However, the majority of patients fail to respond to PD-1/PD-L1 axis inhibitors. Expression of PD-L1 on the membrane of tumor and immune cells has been shown to be associated with enhanced objective response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition. Thus, an improved understanding of how PD-L1 expression is regulated will enable us to better define its role as a predictive marker. In this review, we summarize recent findings in the regulation of PD-L1 expression.

Clinical Impact of RANK Signalling in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a gynaecological malignancy with poor clinical outcome and limited treatment options. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) pathway, activated by RANK ligand (RANKL), critically controls bone metabolism, tumourigenesis and tumour immune responses. Denosumab, a monocloncal RANKL antibody, exerts tumour-suppressive effects in mice and humans. Here, we investigated the relevance of RANK signalling in OC. RANK, RANKL and OPG expression in 192 epithelial OC tissues was compared to expression in 35 non-malignant control tissues and related to clinico-pathological characteristics. Findings were validated in a cohort of 563 OC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The expression of RANK, RANKL and OPG was studied in four OC cell lines and the impact of RANK ligation or blockade on OC cell proliferation was determined. RANK, RANKL and OPG were expressed in epithelial and stromal cells in OC. RANKL expression was elevated in OC tissue, particularly in BRCA1/2 mutated tumours. High RANKL expression independently predicted reduced progression-free (PFS, p = 0.017) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.007), which could be validated in the TCGA cohort (PFS, p = 0.022; OS, p = 0.046, respectively). Expression of RANK and OPG in OC cells was induced by inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNFα. Neither recombinant RANK ligation nor denosumab treatment affected OC cell proliferation. Our study independently links RANKL expression with poor clinical outcome in two unrelated OC cohorts. These findings implicate RANK signalling in the immunopathogenesis of OC and warrant clinical trials with denosumab in OC.

Tremelimumab in Combination With Microwave Ablation in Patients With Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer

Treatment options for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer are limited. Dysregulation of the immune system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to investigate whether tremelimumab, an anti-CTLA4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4) inhibitor, could be combined safely with microwave ablation to enhance the effect of anti-CTLA4 treatment in patients with advanced BTC. Patients were enrolled to receive monthly tremelimumab (10 mg/kg, intravenously) for six doses, followed by infusions every 3 months until off-treatment criteria were met. Thirty-six days after the first tremelimumab dose, patients underwent subtotal microwave ablation. Interval imaging studies were performed every 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were noted and managed. Tumor and peripheral blood samples were collected to perform immune monitoring and whole-exome sequencing (WES). Twenty patients with refractory BTC were enrolled (median age, 56.5 years). No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered. The common treatment-related AEs included lymphopenia, diarrhea, and elevated transaminases. Among 16 patients evaluable for efficacy analysis, 2 (12.5%) patients achieved a confirmed partial response (lasting for 8.0 and 18.1 months, respectively) and 5 patients (31.3%) achieved stable disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-5.2) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.8), respectively. Peripheral blood immune cell subset profiling showed increased circulating activated human leukocyte antigen, DR isotype ([HLA-DR] positive) CD8⁺ T cells. T-cell receptor (TCR)β screening showed tremelimumab expanded TCR repertoire, but not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.057). Conclusion: Tremelimumab in combination with tumor ablation is a potential treatment strategy for patients with advanced BTC. Increased circulating activated CD8⁺ T cells and TCR repertoire expansion induced by tremelimumab may contribute to treatment benefit.

Association of BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficiency with mutation burden, expression of PD-L1/PD-1, immune infiltrates, and T cell-inflamed signature in breast cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated effective anti-tumour response in cancer types with high mutation burden (e.g. melanoma) and in subset of cancers with features of genomic instability (e.g. mismatch-repair deficiency). One possible explanation for this effect is the increased expression of immune checkpoint molecules and pre-existing adaptive immune response in these cancers. Given that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are integral in maintaining genomic integrity, we hypothesise that the inactivation of these genes may give rise to breast cancers with such immunogenic phenotype. Therefore, using two large series of publicly available breast cancer datasets, namely that from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Wellcome Trust Institute, we sought to investigate the association between BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficiency with features of genomic instability, expression of PD-L1 and PD-1, landscape of inferred tumour-infiltrating immune cells, and T-cell inflamed signature in breast cancers. Here, we report that BRCA1 and BRCA2-deficient breast cancers were associated with features of genomic instability including increased mutation burden. Interestingly, BRCA1-, but not BRCA2-, deficient breast cancers were associated with increased expression of PD-L1 and PD-1, higher abundance of tumour-infiltrating immune cells, and enrichment of T cell-inflamed signature. The differences in immunophenotype between BRCA1- and BRCA2-deficient breast cancers can be attributed, in part, to PTEN gene mutation. Therefore, features of genomic instability such as that mediated by BRCA1- and BRCA2- deficiency in breast cancer were necessary, but not always sufficient, for yielding T cell-inflamed tumour microenvironment, and by extension, predicting clinical benefit from immunotherapy.

The Reciprocity between Radiotherapy and Cancer Immunotherapy

The clinical success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating metastatic and refractory cancers has generated significant interest in investigating their role in treating locally advanced diseases, thus requiring them to be combined with standard treatments in the hope of producing synergistic antitumor responses. Radiotherapy, in particular, has long been hypothesized to have actions complementary to those of immune checkpoint blockade, and a growing body of evidence indicates that cancer immunotherapy may also have radiosensitizing effects, which would provide unique benefit for locoregional treatments. Recent studies have demonstrated that when immune cells are activated by immunotherapeutics, they can reprogram the tumor microenvironment in ways that may potentially increase the radiosensitivity of the tumor. In this review, we highlight the evidence that supports reciprocal interactions between cancer immunotherapy and radiotherapy, where in addition to the traditional notion that radiation serves to enhance the activation of antitumor immunity, an alternative scenario also exists in which T-cell activation by cancer immunotherapy may sensitize tumors to radiation treatment through mechanisms that include normalization of the tumor vasculature and tissue hypoxia. We describe the empirical observations from preclinical models that support such effects and discuss their implications for future research and trial design.

TP53 missense mutation is associated with increased tumor-infiltrating T cells in primary prostate cancer

The makeup of the tumor immune microenvironment may be associated with tumor somatic genomic alterations and plays a key role in tumor progression and response to immunotherapy. We examined the association of tumor-infiltrating T-cell density with TP53 status in surgically treated primary prostate cancer using 3 independent tissue microarray sets, including one set of tumors from grade-matched patients of European American or African American ancestry (n = 391), a retrospective case-cohort of intermediate- and high-risk patients enriched for adverse outcomes (n = 267), and a set of tumors with primary Gleason pattern 5 (n = 77). The presence of TP53 missense mutation, indicated by p53 nuclear accumulation using a genetically validated assay, was significantly associated with increased CD3+ T-cell density (median, 341 versus 231 CD3+ T cells/mm²; P = .004) in the matched European American and African American ancestry patient sets. The same association was present in patients of both ancestries when analyzed separately, despite the fact that p53 nuclear accumulation was less frequent among African American compared with European American tumors (7% versus 3%, P = .2). The validation cohorts of intermediate/high-risk and primary Gleason pattern 5 patients corroborated the association of increased CD3+ T-cell density with presence of p53 nuclear accumulation. In a pooled analysis of all sets, adjusting for clinicopathological variables, CD3+ and CD8+, but not FOXP3+, T-cell densities remained significantly higher in tumors with p53 nuclear accumulation compared with those without. TP53 mutation is associated with higher tumor-infiltrating T-cell density, which may be relevant in future clinical trials of immunotherapy in prostate cancer.

Immunotherapies based on PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors in ovarian cancer treatment

Immunotherapies based on anti-programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway inhibitors may turn out effective in ovarian cancer (OC) treatment. They can be used in combination with standard therapy and are especially promising in recurrent and platinum-resistant OC. There is growing evidence that the mechanism of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway can be specific for a particular histological cancer type. Interestingly, the data have shown that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway blockade may be effective, especially in the endometrioid type of OC. It is important to identify the cause of anti-tumor immune response suppression and exclude its other mechanisms in OC patients. It is also necessary to conduct subsequent studies to confirm in which OC cases the treatment is effective and how to select patients and combine drugs to improve patient survival.

BRCA gene mutations do not shape the extent and organization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancer

This study investigated the prevalence of TIL subpopulations, TLS, PD-1 and PD-L1 in tumors from TNBC patients harboring wild-type or mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline genes. This TNBC cohort included 85% TIL-positive (≥10%) tumors with 21% classified as TIL^hi (≥50%). Interestingly, the BRCA^mut group had a significantly higher incidence of TIL^pos tumors compared to the BRCA^wt group (P = 0.037). T cells were dominant in the infiltrate but no statistically significant differences were detected between BRCA^wt and BRCA^mut for CD3⁺, CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells or CD20⁺ B cells. TLS were detected in 74% of tumors but again no significant differences between the BRCA groups. PD-1 expression was observed in 33% and PD-L1 in 53% (any cell, cut-off ≥1%) tumors for the entire TNBC cohort. PD-1 expression correlated with PD-L1 and both with TIL and TLS but was not associated with BRCA mutational status. Our analyses reveal that BRCA^wt and BRCA^mut TNBC are similar except for a significant increase of TIL^pos tumors in the BRCA^mut group. While BRCA gene mutations may not directly drive immune infiltration, the greater number of TIL^pos tumors could signal greater immunogenicity in this group.

Phase III trials in ovarian cancer: The evolving landscape of front line therapy

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer has a high mortality to case ratio. To improve the initial response to therapy, trials of biologic agents in combination with primary chemotherapy and as maintenance after completing chemotherapy are being conducted. Multiple trials are ongoing and this strategy has great promise. However, the changing landscape of primary treatment will make designing future trials in ovarian cancer difficult as there may not be a consensus on the optimal primary therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed clinicaltrials.gov for recent and ongoing phase III clinical trials that are likely to impact primary therapy in ovarian cancer. We summarized the objectives and the available data from these trials.

RESULTS

A total of 12 potentially practice-changing, randomized phase III trials in front line ovarian cancer were identified in which a biologic therapy was added to primary chemotherapy and/or was used in the maintenance setting. These trials included PARP inhibitors (PARPi), anti-angiogenic agents, immuno-oncology agents, and combinations of these agents. Of the 12 trials, 10 are ongoing, one was terminated for futility, and one has been recently reported. All of these trials emphasize the use of maintenance targeted therapy. In addition, 7 randomized phase III trials utilizing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were identified in the setting of upfront ovarian cancer treatment.

DISCUSSION

There are multiple ongoing trials in primary ovarian cancer. These trials investigate PARPi, anti-angiogenic agents, immuno-oncology agents, combinations of these agents, and HIPEC. Many of these trials will mature within the next several years and are likely to change the primary treatment of women with ovarian cancer.

Immunotherapy in ovarian cancer: fake news or the real deal?

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising approaches in oncology, and comprises the activation of the immune system to induce tumor immune surveillance or to reverse the tumor immune escape. Different therapeutic strategies for ovarian carcinoma have evolved over the years. Already 30 years ago, the first clinical studies focused on modulating the tumor cytokine network with special attention to interferon-mediated immune responses. With the exploration of specific tumor antigens such as NY-ESO-1, which is expressed in ovarian carcinoma and other malignancies, the development of therapeutic cancer vaccines has been pursued initiating the era of personalized anti-cancer medicine. Almost at the same time, the adoptive transfer of genetically modified autologous tumor-reactive T-cells occurred, but response rates in ovarian carcinoma were disappointing. Today, probably the most promising therapeutic approach in this context is the blockade of immune checkpoints, such as programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and one of its ligands (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), which has demonstrated impressive response rates in malignant melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Despite increasing availability of treatment approaches that target tumor immune surveillance in ovarian carcinoma, selecting patient groups that particularly benefit from these treatment modalities is clinically challenging as predictive biomarkers are lacking. Here, we summarize different immunotherapy approaches in ovarian cancer and discuss why immunotherapy in ovarian cancer is still in its infancy.

Soluble forms of immune checkpoint receptor PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 in plasma of patients with ovarian neoplasms

Background:Ovarian cancer is one of the most common oncologic diseases holding the frst place in mortality related to neoplasms of female genitalia. Along with active surgical intervention, contemporary ovarian cancer treatment includes various chemotherapeutic regimens which in many cases are quite effective, but relapse and death rates still remain high. In the recent years, major attention has been paid to the possibility of ovarian cancer immunotherapy associated with the discovery of the so-called “immune checkpoint” signaling, i.e. programmed cell death-1 / programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L) pathway, controlling intensity and duration of autoimmune response at physiologic conditions. Tumor PD-1 and/or PD-L1 expression is being actively studied as a predictor of anti-PD-1/PD-L treatment efficacy; however, this approach has certain limitations and problems that might be probably bypassed by determination of soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and its ligand (sPD-L1) in serum or plasma.

Aim:Comparative evaluation of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 content in plasma of healthy women and of patients with benign or borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian cancer, as well as the analysis of associations between these markers and main clinical and pathologic characteristics of ovarian cancer.

Materials and methods:Sixty two (62) patients with ovarian neoplasms aged 32 to 77 (median, 56.5) years were enrolled into the study. Fifteen (15) patients had benign tumors, 9 had borderline, and 38, ovarian cancer. The control group included 17 healthy women aged 24 to 67 (median, 49) years. Plasma sPD-L1 and sPD-1 concentrations were measured with standard enzyme immunoassay kits (Afmetrix, eBioscience, USA).

Results:Plasma sPD-L1 and sPD-1 levels in ovarian cancer patients (median, 41.3 and 48.0 pg/ml, respectively) did not differ significantly from those in the control group (49.5 and 43.8 pg/ml). sPD-L1 level in the patients with benign tumors (median, 22.2 pg/ml) was signifcantly lower than in the control (p < 0.01). The lowest sPD-1 level in plasma was found in the patients with borderline ovarian neoplasms, the difference with the ovarian cancer group being statistically signifcant (p < 0.05). No correlations between sPD-L1 and sPD-1 plasma levels were found in any of the study groups. sPD-L1 level signifcantly increased with disease stage (R = 0.44; p < 0.01), the most signifcant increase being observed at the most advanced IIIC stage (p < 0.05 as compared to all other stages). sPD-L1 was also signifcantly higher in the patients with ascites than in those without ascites. Plasma sPD-1 concentration was not associated with the indices of ovarian cancer progression, though its median was 1.3–1.44 times lower in the stage I than in the stage II–III patients, and decreased in those with the tumor size above 10 cm (assessed by ultrasound examination) and in the patients with ascites. No statistically signifcant associations of the markers' levels with tumor histological type and differentiation grade of ovarian cancer were found.

Conclusion:sPD-L1 level in ovarian cancer patients correlates with disease progression and can be considered as a promising marker for monitoring of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment efficacy. Potential clinical implications of sPD-1 require further studies.

Ovarian Cancer Immunotherapy: Preclinical Models and Emerging Therapeutics

Immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising approaches for ovarian cancer treatment. The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a key factor to consider when stimulating antitumoral responses as it consists largely of tumor promoting immunosuppressive cell types that attenuate antitumor immunity. As our understanding of the determinants of the TME composition grows, we have begun to appreciate the need to address both inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity, mutation/neoantigen burden, immune landscape, and stromal cell contributions. The majority of immunotherapy studies in ovarian cancer have been performed using the well-characterized murine ID8 ovarian carcinoma model. Numerous other animal models of ovarian cancer exist, but have been underutilized because of their narrow initial characterizations in this context. Here, we describe animal models that may be untapped resources for the immunotherapy field because of their shared genomic alterations and histopathology with human ovarian cancer. We also shed light on the strengths and limitations of these models, and the knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to enhance the utility of preclinical models for testing novel immunotherapeutic approaches.

Resistance to Radiotherapy and PD-L1 Blockade Is Mediated by TIM-3 Upregulation and Regulatory T-Cell Infiltration

Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) can transform the immune landscape and render poorly immunogenic tumors sensitive to PD-L1 inhibition. Here, we established that the response to combined RT and PD-L1 inhibition is transient and investigated mechanisms of resistance.Experimental Design: Mechanisms of resistance to RT and PD-L1 blockade were investigated in orthotopic murine head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumors using mass cytometry and whole-genome sequencing. Mice were treated with anti-PD-L1 or anti-TIM-3 alone and in combination with and without RT. Tumor growth and survival were assessed. Flow cytometry was used to assess phenotypic and functional changes in intratumoral T-cell populations. Depletion of regulatory T cells (Treg) was performed using anti-CD25 antibody.Results: We show that the immune checkpoint receptor, TIM-3, is upregulated on CD8 T cells and Tregs in tumors treated with RT and PD-L1 blockade. Treatment with anti-TIM-3 concurrently with anti-PD-L1 and RT led to significant tumor growth delay, enhanced T-cell cytotoxicity, decreased Tregs, and improved survival in orthotopic models of HNSCC. Despite this treatment combination, the response was not durable, and analysis of relapsed tumors revealed resurgence of Tregs. Targeted Treg depletion, however, restored antitumor immunity in mice treated with RT and dual immune checkpoint blockade and resulted in tumor rejection and induction of immunologic memory.Conclusions: These data reveal multiple layers of immune regulation that can promote tumorigenesis and the therapeutic potential of sequential targeting to overcome tumor resistance mechanisms. We propose that targeted Treg inhibitors may be critical for achieving durable tumor response with combined radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(21); 5368-80. ©2018 AACR.