Scalene regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery in a community setting: an assessment of risk

Interscalene regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite a trend toward the use of regional anesthesia for orthopaedic procedures, there has been resistance to the use of interscalene regional block for shoulder surgery because of concerns about failed blocks and potential complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 568 consecutive patients who had shoulder surgery under interscalene regional block in a tertiary-care, university-based practice with an anesthesiology residency program. The blocks were performed by a group of anesthesiologists who were dedicated to the concept of regional anesthesia in their practice. Complete anesthetic and orthopaedic records were available for 547 patients. The surgical procedure, planned type of anesthesia, occurrence of block failure, and the presence of complications were noted.

RESULTS

Of the 547 patients, 295 underwent an arthroscopic procedure and 252 (including eighty who had an arthroplasty) underwent an open procedure. General anesthesia was the initial planned choice for sixty-nine patients because of the complexity or duration of the procedure, the anatomic location, or patient insistence. Thirty-four of the sixty-nine patients also received an interscalene regional block. Interscalene regional block alone was planned for 478 patients. A total of 462 patients (97%) had a successful block whereas sixteen required general anesthesia because the block was inadequate. The success of the block was independent of the type or length of the surgery. No patient had a seizure, pneumothorax, cardiac event, or other major complication. Twelve (2.3%) of the 512 patients who had a block had minor complications, which included sensory neuropathy in eleven patients and a complex regional pain syndrome that resolved at three months in one patient. For ten of the eleven patients, the neuropathy had resolved by six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Interscalene regional block provides effective anesthesia for most types of shoulder surgery, including arthroplasty and fracture fixation. When administered by an anesthesiologist committed to and skilled in the technique, the block has an excellent rate of success and is associated with a relatively low complication rate.

Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery

We review the literature on complication of arthroscopic shoulder surgery and their management. Computer data based searches were used to identify articles regarding complications of shoulder arthroscopy, as well as hand searches of Arthroscopy and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery over the last decade. Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has become a popular therapeutic and diagnostic procedure during the past two decades. As with all interventions complications can occur which require recognition and management by the orthopedic surgeon. While the literature is helpful with identifying types of complications, establishing the rate of these complications remains elusive. These complications can be divided into general complications, complications generic to all shoulder procedures, and complications specific to the type of procedure performed. General complications such as infection and anesthesia problems continue to show low incidences. Shoulder arthroscopy presents increased risk of complications over knee arthroscopy in regard to vascular and neurologic injury, fluid extravasation, stiffness, iatrogenic tendon injury, and equipment failure. New techniques of increased complexity for subacromial surgery, rotator cuff repair, and arthroscopic instability present new problems related to implant failure, nerve injury, iatrogenic fracture, and capsular necrosis. While the rate of complications especially with newer procedures remain elusive, most studies suggest that the rate is low, 5.8-9.5% in all recent review studies published. Underreporting complications makes assessment of incidence rates of complication difficult. Proper patient selection, attention to operative detail, and careful post-operative monitoring can minimize the morbidity associated with these complications.