What is the evidence for once-daily aminoglycoside therapy?

Aminoglycoside dosing: one, two or three times a day?

The safety and efficacy of conventional aminoglycoside dosing regimens have been proven in clinical trials. Higher doses at longer intervals may be more effective if they result in higher peak serum levels of the drug, but few trials of "once-a-day" dosing have shown improved clinical outcome. The clinical safety of allowing trough serum levels to fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration is not established. Literal "once-a-day" dosing will result in drug accumulation and toxicity in patients with reduced renal clearance, and in potential lack of efficacy and the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms in those with increased renal clearance. However, modified "once-a-day" dosing, with the interval determined by the individual's renal clearance rate (hence avoiding subtherapeutic trough levels), will avoid these problems.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of once-daily aminoglycoside treatment

A special topic in pharmacoeconomics concerns antimicrobial therapy. The cost of antimicrobial therapy and an economic evaluation of aminoglycoside antibiotics in the last 30 years are reviewed. Some innovative approaches have been found to be effective in the control of the use of aminoglycosides and those are: 1) selecting the appropriate aminoglycoside, 2) therapeutic drug monitoring and, 3) once-daily administration. The practical advantages of once-daily aminoglycoside dosing are discussed and the conclusion is that combination therapy continues to be a mainstay in several serious Gram-negative infections. Concerns about breakthrough infection with extended aminoglycoside dosing intervals can be resolved by combination with a betalactam antibiotic. The lower costs associated with once-daily aminoglycoside dosing are the consequence of a straightforward dosage calculation, a guaranteed peak serum concentration in the therapeutic range, potential reduction in treatment period, easier quality control of preparation and administration, decreased personnel time, and fewer assays. However, some practical considerations remain unanswered.

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of once-daily aminoglycoside chemotherapy

The rationale for and effectiveness of extended dosage intervals for aminoglycosides are reviewed. Aminoglycoside antibiotics have a prolonged postantibiotic effect against a variety of common Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms: higher serum aminoglycoside levels are associated with a longer postantibiotic effect and increased bactericidal activity. Moreover once daily aminoglycoside administration may reduce the potential for adaptive postexposure resistance by allowing less contact time between bacteria and antibiotic. A longer dosage interval may decrease the risk of nephro- and ototoxicity. At least 33 published clinical trials suggest that once-daily administration of aminoglycosides and conventional regimens involving shorter dosage intervals are equally effective in patients with normal renal function and Gram-negative infections: besides, once-daily administration may reduce the frequency of aminoglycoside toxicity or delay it.

Experience of once-daily aminoglycoside dosing using a target area under the concentration-time curve

BACKGROUND

Many centres are changing to once-daily aminoglycoside administration. However, proposed methods for this practice often have theoretical and practical difficulties. We have developed a method in which a target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is used instead of traditional peak and trough serum concentrations.

AIMS

To analyse our experience with the target AUC method in the first 100 courses of once-daily aminoglycoside administration in the Christchurch, New Zealand hospitals.

METHODS

Following a starting dose of 5-7 mg/kg, administered by 30-minute infusion, the AUC was calculated using two serum aminoglycoside concentrations taken at one and six-14 hours after the start of the infusion. Dose adjustment was made to correct for any difference between the calculated AUC and a target AUC (72-101 mg.1(-1).h). The method was assessed for practicality and precision in 100 courses of treatment. The incidence of aminoglycoside toxicity was documented.

RESULTS

The mean final dose of 6.68 mg/kg, and AUC of 92.8 mg.1(-1).h, were significantly different from the mean starting dose and AUC of 5.67 mg/kg and 74.0 mg.1(-1).h, respectively. The method appeared to be more precise than empirical dosing at achieving the target AUC even though the final recommended dose had more variability than the starting dose. Although the study was uncontrolled, observed nephrotoxicity (2%) and ototoxicity (up to 6.9%) were no greater than expected from the results of other studies. There were no deaths related to antibiotic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUC method was practical, and more appropriate for once-daily dosing than the conventional method of aiming for target peak and trough concentrations. Dose adjustment can be made before the next dose.

The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate relationships have been used to describe the antibacterial activity of various classes of antimicrobial agents. Studies that have evaluated these relationships were reviewed to determine which of these surrogate markers were further dependent on antimicrobial class. The fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside agents exhibit concentration-dependent killing. Studies have demonstrated that peak serum concentration: minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC): MIC ratios are important predictors of outcome for these antimicrobial agents. Area under the inhibitory concentration-time curve (AUIC24) [i.e. AUC24/MIC] is a useful parameter for describing efficacy for these agents, while an adequate peak concentration: MIC ratio seems necessary to prevent selection of resistant organisms. For beta-lactam antibiotics, the duration of time that the serum concentration exceeds the MIC (T > MIC) was the significant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate in cases where the bacterial inoculum was low, or where very sensitive organisms were tested. However, in studies using more resistant organisms or larger inoculum sizes there is some concentration-dependence to the observed effect. Studies using reasonable dosage intervals have demonstrated covariance between T > MIC and AUC/MIC ratio for beta-lactam antibiotics. Since glycopeptide antibiotics display relatively slow but concentration-independent killing, and are cell wall active agents similar to beta-lactams, it has been presumed that T > MIC is the important pharmacokinetic surrogate related to efficacy for these agents. Some studies have shown that a concentration multiple of the MIC may be necessary for successful outcome with vancomycin. AUIC24 may prove to be an important pharmacokinetic surrogate if both time and concentration are indeed important parameters. To select an appropriate antimicrobial agent, the clinician must consider many patient-specific as well as organism-specific factors. Utilisation of known pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate relationships should help to optimise treatment outcome.

Pharmacokinetic contributions to postantibiotic effects. Focus on aminoglycosides

The postantibiotic effect (PAE) refers to a period of time after complete removal of an antimicrobial during which there is no growth of the target organism. The PAE appears to be a feature of most antimicrobial agents and has been documented with a variety of common bacterial pathogens. Various factors influence the presence or duration of the PAE including the type of organism, type of antimicrobial, concentration of antimicrobial, duration of antimicrobial exposure, antimicrobial combinations, and inoculum and medium used. beta-Lactams demonstrate a PAE against Gram-positive cocci, but produce only a short PAE with Gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrobial agents that inhibit RNA or protein synthesis have a PAE against Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli. In vivo studies of aminoglycosides suggest that area under the plasma concentration-time curve is the pharmacokinetic parameter that best correlates with clinical efficacy. This is thought to be due to the concentration-dependent killing and PAE possessed by these antimicrobials. Animal and human studies have reported that once-daily administration of aminoglycoside is as effective as, or more effective than, and possibly less toxic than traditional multiple daily administration.