Sirolimus: the evidence for clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring

Immune monitoring post liver transplant

Many of the causes of short and late morbidity following liver transplantation are associated with immunosuppression or immunosuppressive medications. Current care often involves close monitoring of liver biochemistry as well as therapeutic drug levels. However, the postoperative course following liver transplantation can often be associated with significant complications including infection and rejection, suggesting an inadequacy in current immune function monitoring. Many assays have been tested in the research setting to identify possible biomarkers that may be used to predict clinical events such as acute cellular rejection, and therefore allow modification of a patient’s immunosuppressive regimen prior to a clinical event. However, these generally require significant laboratory processing and have had difficulty becoming established in common clinical use outside the research setting. One assay, Cylex ImmuKnow has been food and drug administration approved but has had variable results. In this review we discuss the assays that have been used to assess monitoring of immune function after liver transplantation and consider possible future directions.

Long-term evaluation of analytical methods used in sirolimus therapeutic drug monitoring

Results of therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus blood concentrations are assay and laboratory dependent. This study compared performance over time of the IMx microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), Architect chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (LC/MS/MS) as part of a proficiency testing scheme. Pooled samples from sirolimus-treated patients and whole-blood samples spiked with known quantities of sirolimus were assayed monthly between 2004 and 2012. When results of pooled patient samples were compared with LC/MS/MS, the MEIA assay showed an overall mean percent bias of -2.3% ± 11.2% that, although initially positive, became increasingly negative from 2007 through 2009. The CMIA, which replaced the MEIA assay, had a mean percent bias of 21.9% ± 12.3%, remaining stable from 2007 through 2012. Similarly, for spiked samples, the MEIA showed an increasingly negative bias over time vs. LC/MS/MS, whereas CMIA maintained a stable positive bias. Based on comparison of immunoassay measurements on individual patient samples, CMIA values were more than 25% higher than MEIA values. These results highlight the importance of continued proficiency testing and regular monitoring of sirolimus assay performance. Clinicians must be aware of the methodology used and adjust target levels accordingly to avoid potential effects on efficacy and toxicity.

Next level of immunosuppression: drug/immune monitoring

1. Current immunological monitoring relies heavily on clinical judgment and therapeutic drug levels and does not adequately assess the functional or donor-specific immunosuppression (IS) status of recipients of liver transplantation (LT). 2. Trough levels of drugs are arbitrary and are more clinically relevant for preventing supratherapeutic or subtherapeutic dosing and blood concentrations and for more closely monitoring at-risk populations (children, the elderly, and patients with organ dysfunction). The AUC or the post-dose levels may be more precise, but they have not been used extensively by transplant centers. 3. Data on drug/immune monitoring specific to LT are fairly limited; therefore, clinical practice is often borrowed from experiences with nonhepatic transplantation (mainly renal transplantation). 4. The monitoring of drug levels in patients taking generic immunosuppressants is challenging because the formulations may change with each prescription. The monitoring of drug or antibody levels is not yet clinically available for biological therapies (induction, lymphocyte-depleting, and maintenance agents). 5. Polymorphisms in drug metabolism (cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein) may be useful in selecting the initial and maintenance dosages of immunosuppressants and in preventing complications from over or underimmunosuppression. 6. Future immune monitoring assays should be focused on genomic or immunological predispositions and on specific reactivities to donor antigens to guide the appropriate dosing and minimization of IS after LT.

A phase I study of sirolimus and bevacizumab in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

We performed a single institution, phase I study of sirolimus and bevacizumab, in order to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II doses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had previously treated advanced malignancies and were enrolled in three cohorts. Sirolimus 90 mg PO weekly (45 mg on days 1 and 2) was combined with bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg (cohort #1) or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (cohort #2) IV q3weeks. Sirolimus 4 mg PO daily was combined with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV q3weeks (cohort #3).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients enrolled. The most common tumour types were colorectal (21%), head/neck (14%), and renal cell (11%). No DLTs were observed in cohorts #1 (4 patients) and #2 (12 patients), while two DLTs (grade 3 confusion and grade 3 fatigue) were observed in the first six patients in cohort #3 (12 patients). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (18%), hypertension (14%) and anorexia (11%). There were no responses, but one patient has had stable disease for 78 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sirolimus and bevacizumab at full doses is tolerable in the majority of patients. The availability and cost of sirolimus compared with other mTOR inhibitors make this an attractive agent to combine with bevacizumab.

Identification and elimination of ion suppression in the quantitative analysis of sirolimus in human blood by LC/ESI-MS/MS

Ion suppression can negatively affect the performance characteristics of LC/ESI-MS/MS based methods, and we wished to identify sources of ion suppression in an assay for quantitating sirolimus in human whole blood. We first compared the peak areas of sirolimus and ascomycin added to human blood samples treated with and without extraction using octadecyl silyl (ODS)-silica gel after protein precipitation, and we found that water-soluble compounds cause the ion suppression for both drugs. Post-column infusion studies indicated that compounds retained in the sample after ODS extraction and protein precipitation caused ion suppression. MS analysis of these compounds suggested they were hydroxyl group-possessing phosphocholines, and this was confirmed using purified lysophosphatidylcholine variants. Therefore, we included a HybridSPE treatment step after the ODS extraction into the preanalytical workflow to remove phosphocholines, and this successfully eliminated the observed ion suppression for determining sirolimus concentration in human whole blood by LC/ESI-MS/MS. Sirolimus is a highly lipophilic molecule, and this study demonstrates the impact that preanalytical extraction and purification steps can have on a laboratory's ability to accurately detect and quantitate this and other lipophilic drugs.

Developmental pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants in pediatric organ transplantation

Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil are the primary immunosuppressants used on pediatric organ transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring is used in daily practice, because their clinical use is hampered by a narrow therapeutic index and large variability. Tailoring immunosuppressive therapy to the individual patient to optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity is therefore essential. Because research in pharmacogenetics already identified polymorphisms impacting their pharmacokinetic parameters in adults, developmental pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants holds promises for optimizing dosage regimens and improving clinical outcome in children. In this review, we focus on the impact of age and pharmacogenetics on these immunosuppressants in children undergoing organ transplantation.

Posttransplantation therapeutic rapamycin concentration protects nitric oxide-related vascular endothelial function: comparative effects in rat thoracic aorta and coronary endothelial cell culture

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential effects of therapeutic dosages of the immunosuppression agent rapamycin on endothelial function with regard to nitric oxide (NO) synthesis in rat thoracic aorta in vivo and rat coronary endothelial cells in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Wistar rats were injected with rapamycin, 1.5 mg/kg/d intraperitoneally for 14 days. After the rats were sacrificed, the thoracic aortas were suspended in organ chambers and evaluated for endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vascular responses.

RESULTS

Rapamycin administration resulted in increased relaxant responses to L-arginine and to greater concentrations of the calcium ionophore (A23187) in the aortas. However, potassium chloride, acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester responses remained unchanged. In addition, phenylephrine-induced contractions were significantly decreased in the aortas regardless of the presence of functional endothelium. In a series of in vitro experiments, isolated rat coronary endothelial cells were incubated with therapeutic concentrations of rapamycin (10 nmol/L). Nitrite accumulation in the supernatants revealed that rapamycin decreased nitrite release induced by interleukin-1beta but did not affect basal or A23187-stimulated nitrite levels. Western blot analysis demonstrated that rapamycin decreased inducible NO synthase protein expression in coronary endothelial cells.

CONCLUSION

Posttransplantation therapeutic concentrations of rapamycin not only preserve vascular endothelial function mediated by NO synthesis but possibly interact in vivo with adrenergic receptors in favor of vasodilatory mechanisms.

Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II

Part I of this article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, reviewed calcineurin inhibitors--ciclosporin and tacrolimus. In part II, we review the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors--sirolimus and everolimus--in thoracic transplantation, and we provide an overall discussion and suggest various areas for future study.

Failed rescue therapy with rapamycin after paraquat intoxication

INTRODUCTION

Ingestion of large quantities of paraquat leads to irreversible, often fatal pulmonary fibrosis. Case presentation. A 50-year-old man (body weight of 78.6 kg) ingested 500 mL Gramoxone containing 200 g/L of paraquat in a suicide attempt. The patient did not seek medical attention until 15 h after ingestion. Initial treatment consisted of the administration of intravenous methylprednisolone, 250 mg once daily. Seventy-two hours after ingestion the patient was transferred to our tertiary care center. Paraquat concentration was 0.2 mg/L in the serum and urinary concentration was 4.42 mg/L. Antioxidative therapy including the administration of acetylcysteine and an anti-inflammatory therapy employing methylprednisolone (1 g/day) was started. Extended daily dialysis was initiated. As the high plasma concentration of paraquat indicated a 100% predicted mortality, we expanded treatment strategies by using the antiproliferative agent rapamycin. A dose of 8 mg/day was started 72 h after the intoxication. Maximum rapamycin concentrations amounted to 12.9 microg/L. Despite these efforts, the patient died on day 18 after intoxication from respiratory failure caused by severe pulmonary fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Despite theoretical considerations suggesting the use of rapamycin in paraquat poisoning, the substance failed to halt the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in this case.

New insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid: possible consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring in solid organ transplantation

Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of immunosuppressive drugs has been an integral part of routine clinical practice in solid organ transplantation for many years, ongoing research in the field of immunosuppressive drug metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical TDM keeps yielding new insights that might have future clinical implications. In this review, the authors will highlight some of these new insights for the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine and tacrolimus and the antimetabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA) and will discuss the possible consequences. For CNIs, important relevant lessons for TDM can be learned from the results of 2 recently published large CNI minimization trials. Furthermore, because acute rejection and drug-related adverse events do occur despite routine application of CNI TDM, alternative approaches to better predict the dose-concentration-response relationship in the individual patient are being explored. Monitoring of CNI concentrations in lymphocytes and other tissues, determination of CNI metabolites, and CNI pharmacogenetics and pharmacodynamics are in their infancy but have the potential to become useful additions to conventional CNI TDM. Although MPA is usually administered at a fixed dose, there is a rationale for MPA TDM, and this is substantiated by the increasing knowledge of the many nongenetic and genetic factors contributing to the interindividual and intraindividual variability in MPA pharmacokinetics. However, recent, large, randomized clinical trials investigating the clinical utility of MPA TDM have reported conflicting data. Therefore, alternative pharmacokinetic (ie, MPA free fraction and metabolites) and pharmacodynamic approaches to better predict drug efficacy and toxicity are being explored. Finally, for MPA and tacrolimus, novel formulations have become available. For MPA, the differences in pharmacokinetic behavior between the old and the novel formulation will have implications for TDM, whereas for tacrolimus, this probably will not to be the case.

Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have significantly contributed to the increased success of thoracic transplantation, there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Maintenance therapy typically consists of a triple-drug regimen including corticosteroids, a calcineurin inhibitor (ciclosporin or tacrolimus) and either a purine synthesis antagonist (mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) or a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (sirolimus or everolimus). The incidence of acute and chronic rejection and of mortality after thoracic transplantation is still high compared with other types of solid organ transplantation. The high allogenicity and immunogenicity of the lungs justify the use of higher doses of immunosuppressants, putting lung transplant recipients at a higher risk of drug-induced toxicities. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual variability of their pharmacokinetics and by a narrow therapeutic index. It is essential to know their pharmacokinetic properties and to use them for treatment individualization through TDM in order to improve the treatment outcome. Unlike the kidneys and the liver, the heart and the lungs are not directly involved in drug metabolism and elimination, which may be the cause of pharmacokinetic differences between patients from all of these transplant groups. TDM is mandatory for most immunosuppressants and has become an integral part of immunosuppressive drug therapy. It is usually based on trough concentration (C(0)) monitoring, but other TDM tools include the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the (12-hour) dosage interval or the AUC over the first 4 hours post-dose, as well as other single concentration-time points such as the concentration at 2 hours. Given the peculiarities of thoracic transplantation, a review of the pharmacokinetics and TDM of the main immunosuppressants used in thoracic transplantation is presented in this article. Even more so than in other solid organ transplant populations, their pharmacokinetics are characterized by wide intra- and interindividual variability in thoracic transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in heart and lung transplant recipients have been explored in a number of studies, but less is known about the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in these populations, and there are hardly any studies on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus and everolimus. Given the increased use of these molecules in thoracic transplant recipients, their pharmacokinetics deserve to be explored in depth. There are very few data, some of which are conflicting, on the practices and outcomes of TDM of immunosuppressants after thoracic transplantation. The development of sophisticated TDM tools dedicated to thoracic transplantation are awaited in order to accurately evaluate the patients' exposure to drugs in general and, in particular, to immunosuppressants. Finally, large cohort TDM studies need to be conducted in thoracic transplant patients in order to identify the most predictive exposure indices and their target values, and to validate the clinical usefulness of improved TDM in these conditions. In part I of the article, we review the pharmacokinetics and TDM of calcineurin inhibitors. In part II, we will review the pharmacokinetics and TDM of mycophenolate and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and provide an overall discussion along with perspectives.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic drug interactions: effect of prednisone, mycophenolic acid or sirolimus

This study was conducted to evaluate time-dependent pharmacokinetic changes and drug interactions over the first 6 months after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), prednisone (PRED) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus (SRL). Pharmacokinetic assessments were carried out at day 7 and months 1, 3, and 6 in kidney transplant recipients receiving TAC plus PRED with either MMF (2 g/day, n = 13) or SRL (15 mg loading dose, 5 mg for 7 days followed by 2 mg/day, n = 12). There were no differences in the main demographic characteristics or in mean PRED doses during the first 6 months after transplant. From day 7 to month 6, there was a 65% increase in TAC dose corrected exposure (dose corrected area under the curve; AUC) in patients receiving MMF (P = 0.005) and a 59% increase in TAC dose corrected exposure in patients receiving SRL (P = 0.008). From day 7 to month 6, there was a 72% increase in mycophenolate dose corrected exposure (P = 0.001) and a 65% increase in SRL dose corrected exposure (P = 0.008). TAC dose corrected exposure was 23% lower in patients receiving SRL compared with MMF (P = 0.012) on average over the study period. PRED dose reduction was associated with increase in TAC (in patients receiving SRL, P = 0.040) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) (P = 0.070) drug exposures. Tercile distribution of TAC drug exposure showed a positive correlation with mean SRL exposures (P = 0.016). Conversely, tercile distribution of SRL drug exposure showed a positive correlation with mean TAC exposures (P = 0.004). Time-dependent increases in TAC, MPA and SRL drug exposures occur up to 6 months after transplantation. Drug-to-drug interactions indicate that intense therapeutic drug monitoring is required to avoid under- or over-immunosuppression.

A rapid liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of whole blood sirolimus using turbulent flow technology for online extraction

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is an immunosuppressant used in solid organ transplantation. Due to variable individual pharmacokinetics and narrow therapeutic ranges, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical to the success of post-transplantation patient care. We developed a rapid method quantifying whole blood sirolimus using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) with an automated online extraction technology.

METHODS

Whole blood (100 microL) was mixed with a precipitation solution containing internal standard (32-desmethoxyrapamycin) and centrifuged at 15,634 x g for 10 min. The supernatant (50 microL) was injected onto a turbulent flow preparatory column and then a C18 analytical column. The mass spectrometer was set for positive electrospray to monitor the ammonium adducts.

RESULTS

Analytical time was 4 min/injection. Inter- and intra-assay variation coefficients across three concentration levels ranged from 2.3% to 7.4%. The method was linear from 1.0 to 100.0 ng/mL with an accuracy of 93.3%-100.0%. No carryover was detected from samples at 313.6 ng/mL. There was no obvious ion suppression from patient samples or interference from other commonly used immunosuppressants. Good correlation with an in-house commercial LC-MS was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The LC-MS/MS method coupled with turbulent flow technology is rapid and efficient in TDM of whole blood sirolimus.

Pharmacologic induction of heme oxygenase-1

Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) is a cytoprotective protein whose expression is consistently associated with therapeutic benefits in a number of pathologic conditions such as atherosclerotic vascular disease and inflammation. Although the expression of HO-1 in most tissues is low, a large number of clinical and experimental pharmacologic compounds have been demonstrated to induce HO-1. This induction is suggested to be at least partially responsible for the perceived therapeutic efficacy of these compounds. The increase in HO-1 expression in response to these compounds is the result of a complex regulatory network involving many signaling pathways and transcription factors. Understanding both the pathways by which HO-1 is induced and the mechanism through which the enzyme exerts its beneficial effects may facilitate the development of novel drugs.

Rapamycin: something old, something new, sometimes borrowed and now renewed

The molecular target of rapamycin (mTOR) is central to a complex intracellular signaling pathway and is involved in diverse processes including cell growth and proliferation, angiogenesis, autophagy, and metabolism. Although sirolimus (rapamycin), the oldest inhibitor of mTOR, was discovered more than 30 years ago, renewed interest in this pathway is evident by the numerous rapalogs recently developed. These newer agents borrow from the structure of sirolimus and, although there are some pharmacokinetic differences, they appear to differ little in terms of pharmacodynamic effects and overall tolerability. Given the multitude of potential applications for this class of agents and the decrease in cost that can be expected upon the expiration of sirolimus patents, renewed focus on this agent is warranted.

Comparison of the CEDIA® and MEIA® assays for the measurement of sirolimus in organ transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated two immunoassays, the CEDIA assay and the MEIA assay, used for the measurement of whole blood levels of sirolimus in organ transplant recipients.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We report on the performance characteristics (total precision, limit of quantitation (functional sensitivity), limit of detection (analytical sensitivity), linearity, accuracy) for each assay. Patient correlation studies were performed, and the results were analyzed using Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok analysis.

RESULTS

Total precision for the MEIA assay, corresponding to three mean concentrations of 5.0, 10.6 and 20.2 ng/mL, was 10.5, 8.5, and 6.7%, respectively. The limit of detection was determined to be 1.1 ng/mL and the limit of quantitation was 1.5 ng/mL. The mean recovery for CEDIA was 105.4%, and analysis of proficiency material demonstrated a large negative bias with respect to the mass spectrometry peer mean-later determined to be due to matrix interference. Results for the CEDIA assay showed a total precision, corresponding to a mean concentration of 5.4, 10.5 and 20.7 ng/mL, of 13.5, 5.6, and 4.1%, respectively. The limit of detection was found to be 4.8 ng/mL, with a limit of quantitation of 5.2 ng/mL. The mean recovery for MEIA was 110.1%, and analysis of proficiency material demonstrated good agreement with the mass spectrometry peer mean with a slight positive bias. Both assays were acceptably linear over the reportable range of the assay. Patient correlation studies demonstrated a positive average bias for both assays versus results from LC-MS measurement (0.9 ng/mL for MEIA, 2.1 ng/mL for CEDIA).

CONCLUSION

Based on this evaluation, the MEIA demonstrated acceptable performance for use in clinical monitoring of sirolimus. However, based on a higher limit of quantitation that falls within the therapeutic interval, the CEDIA is not recommended for clinical monitoring of sirolimus.

Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.

Sirolimus--challenging current perspectives

Sirolimus is a potent immunosuppressant drug with a novel mechanism of action. It inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and blocks the cell cycle of various cell types, including T- and B-lymphocytes. Sirolimus is widely used as a maintenance immunosuppressive agent in organ transplantation. Also, a potentially benefit of this valuable drug in some immunologic and malignant diseases is currently under scrutiny.Classical side effects: hematological (anaemia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia), hypercholesterolemia, arthralgias, extremity oedema and impaired wound healing have been frequently associated with the use of sirolimus. Additionally with its increased use, transplant professionals are encountering a variety of previously unreported and potentially more severe side effects.Here, we review the most recent data on sirolimus unexpected side effects (with an emphasis on pulmonary and renal toxicity), its use in renal transplantation and its new potential therapeutic indications (chronic glomerulopathies, polycystic kidney disease, different types of cancer). A brief description of the current knowledge of sirolimus therapeutic drug monitoring, methods of analysis, pharmacokinetics and drug interactions with calcineurin inhibitors is also included.

Evaluation of an immunoassay (Abbott-IMX Analyzer) allowing routine determination of sirolimus: comparison with LC-MS method

BACKGROUND

The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus is increasing in renal transplantation but its monitoring often requires high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultra-violet (UV) or tandem mass spectrometric (MS-MS) detection. The aim of this study was to compare a new microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA, Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay) on IMx Abbott Analyser with a liquid chromatography-mass spectometry (LC-MS) method.

METHOD

The accuracy of immunoassay analytical performance including within run and between run imprecision and linearity was tested. For comparison studies, sirolimus level was then determined with the two methods on 98 samples from 52 transplant patients.

RESULTS

Total intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients were below 10% at the three levels tested, and the coefficient of linearity was r = 0.99. The values obtained were highly correlated with the LC-MS method (MEIA = 1.02LC-MS + 0.91; r(2) = 0.87). As a result, the immunoassay showed good performance, and clinical sample measurements were not affected by the method. The MEIA may be a useful alternative for routine monitoring of sirolimus.

Evaluation of an immunoassay of whole blood sirolimus in pediatric transplant patients in comparison with high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is widely used as an immunosuppressant, along with calcineurin inhibitors. Because of its variable pharmacokinetics and narrow therapeutic range, therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus is critical to optimize its therapeutic effect and to minimize toxicity. Although liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry is considered the method of choice, the technical and financial challenges of this method are obstacles to its use. A microparticle enzyme immunoassay on the Abbott IMx has recently been reintroduced to the clinical diagnostic market.

METHODS

We evaluated this immunoassay using high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry as the reference method. Precision and carryover were evaluated using an expanded CLSI EP10-A2 protocol. Linearity was studied by serial dilution of high-level whole blood samples, and clinical utility was demonstrated by correlation with the reference method using 56 de-identified pediatric patient samples.

RESULTS

The total imprecision was less than 12% across the concentrations tested. The method was linear from 2.6 to 31 nM. The immunoassay showed a mean positive bias of 11.5% in patient specimens relative to high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (p<0.001), with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.953.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the reintroduced immunoassay is useful for therapeutic drug monitoring of sirolimus.