Mechanism of action and biological profile of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. A new therapeutic alternative

Effects of simvastatin on fasting and postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in patients with type I diabetes mellitus

To assess the effect of simvastatin on fasting and postprandial triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins in subjects with type 1 diabetes and elevated LDL cholesterol levels, eight patients participated in a simvastatin versus placebo, randomized, crossover study. At the end of each drug period fasting and postprandial lipoprotein studies were undertaken. Fasting plasma total and LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (apo B) were significantly lower on simvastatin compared to placebo. Postprandial studies: simvastatin versus placebo consistently decreased the area under the curve (AUC, mean+/-SEM) of TG in plasma (12.52+/-9.07 versus 18.70+/-10.48 mmol x h/L, p = 0.02). Similarly, TG AUC was lower: in the chylomicron subfraction (Sf > 400) 3.24+/-2.71 versus 5.27+/-4.61 mmol x h/L p = 0.03; and in the [chylomicron remnant + VLDL] subfraction (Sf 20-400) 3.98+/-2.51 versus 7.04+/-3.88 mmol x h/L, p = 0.01. This was due to decreased particle n umber rather than size, as shown by a decrease in the AUC of apo B in Sf 20-400 (600+/-360 versus 980+/-600 mg x h/L, p = 0.02) and the lack of change in the ratio of TG/apo B. Intestinal lipoproteins contributed to the simvastatin effect, as shown by the lower AUC of retinyl esters in both subfractions. Chylomicrons: 627.61+/-363.43 versus 948.19+/-568.34 nmol x h/L, p = 0.02 and remnants: 129.23+/-67.12 versus 208.49+/-92.11 nmol x h/L, p = 0.04. Our data suggest an additional mechanism by which simvastatin can decrease the risk of atherosclerosis in patients with type I diabetes: a decrease of the number of circulating intestinal and hepatic postprandial TG-rich lipoprotein particles.

Metabolism and drug interactions of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in transplant patients: are the statins mechanistically similar?

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (EC 1.1.1.88) inhibitors are the most effective drugs to lower cholesterol in transplant patients. However, immunosuppressants and several other drugs used after organ transplantation are cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A, EC 1.14.14.1) substrates. Pharmacokinetic interaction with some of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, specifically lovastatin and simvastatin, leads to an increased incidence of muscle skeletal toxicity in transplant patients. It is our objective to review the role of drug metabolism and drug interactions of lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin. In the treatment of transplant patients, from a drug interaction perspective, pravastatin, which is not significantly metabolized by CYP enzymes, and fluvastatin, presumably a CYP2C9 substrate, compare favorably with the other statins for which the major metabolic pathways are catalyzed by CYP3A.

Current and future treatment of hyperlipidemia: the role of statins

Hyperlipidemia is recognized as one of the major risk factors for the development of coronary artery disease and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. Dietary therapy together with hypolipidemic drugs are central to the management of hyperlipidemia, which aims to prevent atherosclerotic plaque progression, induce regression, and so decrease the risk of acute coronary events in patients with pre-existing coronary or peripheral vascular disease. In patients at high risk of coronary artery disease but without evidence of atherosclerosis, treatment is designed to prevent the premature development of coronary artery disease, whereas in those with hypertriglyceridemia, treatment aims to prevent the development of hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and pancreatitis. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, or statins, are the most potent lipid-lowering agents currently available, and their use in the treatment of hyperlipidemia provides the focus for this review. Particular emphasis is given to cerivastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor that combines potent cholesterol-lowering properties with significant triglyceride-reducing effects. Recently completed primary and secondary intervention trials have shown that the significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol achieved with statins result in significant reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with coronary artery disease as well as reductions in the incidence of stroke and total mortality. Such benefits occur early in the course of statin therapy and have led to suggestions that these drugs may possess antiatherogenic effects over and above their capacity to lower atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins. Experimental studies have also shown statin-induced improvements in endothelial function, decreased platelet thrombus formation, improvements in fibrinolytic activity, and reductions in the frequency of transient myocardial ischemia.

Crossover trial of simvastatin versus pravastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

The effects of simvastatin and pravastatin administered alone at initial doses of 5 and 10 mg/day, respectively, on normalization of abnormal lipid metabolism in patients with hypercholesterolemia were evaluated by a crossover method. Patients whose serum levels of total cholesterol (TC) were > or = 220 mg/dl were randomly divided into two groups, and one of the groups (group S-P: 17 patients) was treated with simvastatin first and then with pravastatin whereas the other group (group P-S: 19 patients) was treated with pravastatin first and then with simvastatin. Simvastatin or pravastatin was replaced with the other drug after 8-week administration in each group. These drugs were administered for 8 weeks each. Simvastatin and pravastatin significantly reduced the following serum lipids as compared with the levels in the observation period: TC by 23.2 +/- 8.1% and 18.1 +/- 10.9%, triglyceride (TG) by 13.0 +/- 24.7% and 5.8 +/- 47.1%, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 31.3 +/- 10.1% and 23.1 +/- 14.3%, respectively. TC and LDL-C levels were significantly (p < 0.001) lower and decreased to significantly (p < 0.001) greater degrees after simvastatin treatment than after pravastatin treatment. TC was normalized in 77.8% of the patients (28 of 36) after simvastatin treatment and in 68.9% of the patients (23 of 36) after pravastatin treatment. LDL-C was normalized in 63.9% of the patients (23 of 36) after simvastatin treatment and in 44.4% of the patients (16 of 36) after pravastatin treatment. The percentage of patients whose LDL-C was normalized by simvastatin was significantly (p < 0.05) higher as compared with pravastatin. Results of this trial, which was conducted by a crossover method, show that the initial dose of simvastatin reduces serum cholesterol and LDL-C more potently than the initial dose of pravastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Cost-effectiveness of initial therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors to treat hypercholesterolemia in a primary care setting of a managed-care organization

From January 1994 through May 1995, Prudential HealthCare-North Texas prospectively studied 299 member patients diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia for whom pharmacotherapy with one of four 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, also known as statins, was prescribed. The purpose of this study was to measure the relative cost-effectiveness (CE) of these drugs in a real-world setting. This study provides information to assist decision makers in managed-care organizations (MCO) in making formulary selections. The study used a prospective, randomized, balanced cohort design, examining patients who had been prescribed initial therapy with a statin drug as monotherapy. Costs (direct medical and indirect costs) and effectiveness (percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels) were based on approximately the first 6 months of initial therapy. Both the MCO and patient perspectives were considered. In the base case, mean CE ratios were significantly lower for fluvastatin compared with lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin from both the managed-care perspective and the patient perspective. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the CE conclusions, even under conditions of varying cost structures. Although differences were found in the effectiveness of lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin measured in this study versus efficacy measured for these drugs in controlled clinical trials, sensitivity analysis suggests that these differences alone do not determine the superior CE of fluvastatin. Finally, this study supports the idea that well-designed formularies should consider drug CE (based on safety, effectiveness, and cost) and that integration of the pharmacy benefit management with other medical management is essential. These results provide evidence that fluvastatin may represent a more cost-effective formulary choice among statin products used for initial monotherapy of hypercholesterolemia.

Fluvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia

Fluvastatin, a member of the group of drugs known as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, is used in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In clinical trials in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia, fluvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day achieved marked reductions from baseline in serum levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (19 to 31%) and total cholesterol (15 to 21%), along with modest declines in serum triglyceride levels (1 to 12%) and small increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels (2 to 10%). These beneficial effects on the serum lipid profile were similar to those demonstrated with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, although direct comparative trials are limited. Concomitant administration of fluvastatin plus another lipid-lowering agent, such as a bile acid sequestrant, a fibrate or nicotinic acid, usually reduced serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol by at least a further 5 to 10% from baseline compared with fluvastatin monotherapy. Fluvastatin has a similar tolerability profile to that of other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Gastrointestinal disturbances, which are usually mild and transient, were the most frequently reported adverse events with fluvastatin in clinical trials. Persistent elevation of serum transaminase levels occurred in approximately 1% of fluvastatin recipients, which is similar to the rate for other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Unlike other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which have been infrequently associated with myopathy and rarely with rhabdomyolysis, these events have not been associated with fluvastatin to date, although fluvastatin has not been used as extensively as agents such as lovastatin. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors other than fluvastatin, when given in combination with drugs such as fibrates, nicotinic acid, cyclosporin or erythromycin, can increase the risk of these potentially serious adverse events. Thus far, myopathy or rhabdomyolysis have not been reported among patients receiving fluvastatin concomitantly with any of these drugs. Therefore, fluvastatin can be given with caution in combination with fibrates, nicotinic acid, cyclosporin or erythromycin. In conclusion, fluvastatin has similar efficacy and tolerability profiles to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which are among the most effective agents available for treating patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Pharmacoeconomic studies performed to date suggest an advantage for fluvastatin over other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, predominantly because of its relatively low acquisition costs (at least in those countries in which the evaluations were conducted). Thus, fluvastatin is effective and well tolerated in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and appears to have an economic advantage over other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, primarily as a result of its relatively low acquisition costs.

Simvastatin. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in hypercholesterolaemia

Simvastatin is an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Since the time simvastatin was previously reviewed in Drugs, a number of large clinical trials have confirmed its clinical efficacy. Thus, reductions from baseline were approximately 20 to 40% for serum levels of total cholesterol, 35 to 45% for low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and 10 to 20% for triglycerides in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia receiving simvastatin 10 to 40 mg/day. High density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels were increased modestly by about 5 to 15%. Recent data from long term studies indicate that little or no attenuation of these changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein levels occurred with administration of simvastatin for 3 to 5.4 years. Comparative studies with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (lovastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin), which were lacking at the time of the previous review of simvastatin, demonstrated greater reductions in serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol with simvastatin than equal dosages of lovastatin or pravastatin. Reductions in serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol were similar between agents only when lovastatin or pravastatin were administered at a total daily dosage twice that of simvastatin and when fluvastatin was administered at a total daily dosage approximately 8 times that of simvastatin. In general, simvastatin 10 to 40 mg/day was also more effective than standard dosages of bile acid sequestrants, fibrates or probucol in lowering serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol; however, fibrates usually produced greater reductions in serum triglycerides and greater elevations in HDL-cholesterol levels. The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), a large secondary prevention study in patients with coronary heart disease and concomitant hypercholesterolaemia, demonstrated that simvastatin 20 to 40 mg/day for a median of 5.4 years significantly reduced overall mortality (the primary end-point of the study) by 30% compared with placebo, which was attributed to a 42% relative reduction in coronary mortality. Coronary morbidity was also significantly reduced by simvastatin in the 4S trial. The tolerability profile of simvastatin appears to be comparable to that of other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. The most frequently reported adverse events are gastrointestinal disturbances, which are generally mild and tend to occur less frequently than with cholestyramine. In conclusion, simvastatin is among the most effective agents available for treating patients with hypercholesterolaemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparative evaluation of the safety and efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of the 4 currently available hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin, in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.

DATA SOURCES

English-language clinical studies, abstracts, and review articles identified from MEDLINE searches and bibliographies of identified articles. Unpublished data were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act.

STUDY SELECTION

Placebo-controlled and comparative studies of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor monotherapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent studies were selected and the data were synthesized into a review format.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of the 4 HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are reviewed. Clinical trials evaluating the hypocholesterolemic efficacy of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are examined, and results on the comparative efficacy and safety of these agents are summarized. On a milligram-per-milligram basis, simvastatin is twice as potent as lovastatin and pravastatin. The hypocholesterolemic effects of fluvastatin appear to be approximately 30% less than that of lovastatin. In posttransplant patients receiving cyclosporine, safety has been documented for low doses of lovastatin and simvastatin, but when a higher dosage of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor is warranted, pravastatin should be considered the drug of choice because of a lower incidence of myopathy. Relevant data on the incidence of adverse effects are presented. Pertinent outcomes data from clinical trials evaluating the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on atherosclerosis regression and coronary mortality, as well as published economic analyses of cholesterol-lowering agents, are summarized. Recommendations on the selection of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor in various clinical situations are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature supports the comparable safety and tolerability of all 4 currently available HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Therefore, the choice of an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor should depend on the extent of cholesterol lowering needed to meet the recommended treatment goal established by the National Cholesterol Education Program. Direct comparative studies are needed to confirm the relative, long-term cost-effectiveness of the various HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia.

Chemical ecology: a view from the pharmaceutical industry

Biological diversity reflects an underlying molecular diversity. The molecules found in nature may be regarded as solutions to challenges that have been confronted and overcome during molecular evolution. As our understanding of these solutions deepens, the efficiency with which we can discover and/or design new treatments for human disease grows. Nature assists our drug discovery efforts in a variety of ways. Some compounds synthesized by microorganisms and plants are used directly as drugs. Human genetic variations that predispose to (or protect against) certain diseases may point to important drug targets. Organisms that manipulate molecules within us to their benefit also may help us to recognize key biochemical control points. Drug design efforts are expedited by knowledge of the biochemistry of a target. To supplement this knowledge, we screen compounds from sources selected to maximize molecular diversity. Organisms known to manipulate biochemical pathways of other organisms can be sources of particular interest. By using high throughput assays, pharmaceutical companies can rapidly scan the contents of tens of thousands of extracts of microorganisms, plants, and insects. A screen may be designed to search for compounds that affect the activity of an individual targeted human receptor, enzyme, or ion channel, or the screen might be designed to capture compounds that affect any step in a targeted metabolic or biochemical signaling pathway. While a natural product discovered by such a screen will itself only rarely become a drug (its potency, selectivity, bioavailability, and/or stability may be inadequate), it may suggest a type of structure that would interact with the target, serving as a point of departure for a medicinal chemistry effort--i.e., it may be a "lead." It is still beyond our capability to design, routinely, such lead structures, based simply upon knowledge of the structure of our target. However, if a drug discovery target contains regions of structure homologous to that in other proteins, structures known to interact with those proteins may prove useful as leads for a medicinal chemistry effort. The specificity of a lead for a target may be optimized by directing structural variation to specificity-determining sites and away from those sites required for interaction with conserved features of the targeted protein structure. Strategies that facilitate recognition and exploration of sites at which variation is most likely to generate a novel function increase the efficiency with which useful molecules can be created.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of simvastatin and pravastatin for hypercholesterolemia. The Simvastatin Pravastatin Study Group

The efficacy and safety profile of simvastatin and pravastatin across their most commonly recommended dosage ranges were compared in a double-blind, parallel, multicenter study in 550 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. The study consisted of a 6-week placebo period followed by 18 weeks of active treatment. Patients were randomized to 10 mg of simvastatin or pravastatin once in the evening; doses were titrated at 6-week intervals to a maximum of 40 mg/day if the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol remained > or = 130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/liter). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. At the end of the study with simvastatin and pravastatin, respectively, 30 and 14% continued to take the 10 mg dose and 48 and 66% were titrated to the maximal dose. After 18 weeks of treatment with simvastatin and pravastatin the mean percent decreases from baseline were, respectively, for total plasma cholesterol 27 and 19% (p < 0.01 between groups), for LDL cholesterol 38 and 26% (p < 0.01 between groups), for very low density lipoprotein cholesterol 30 and 16% (p < 0.01 between groups), and for triglycerides 18 and 14% (p < 0.05 between groups). The mean percent increase from baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 15% with simvastatin compared to 12% with pravastatin (p < 0.05 between groups). The efficacy goal of LDL cholesterol < 130 mg/dl was achieved in 65% of the patients treated with simvastatin versus 39% of those treated with pravastatin (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups in the frequency of drug-related adverse experiences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

New approaches to atherosclerosis: an overview

The mechanisms of action and selected agents for a variety of approaches to the treatment of atherosclerosis have been reviewed. In Table I, each approach is listed according to its primary physiological effect. This is a simplification, of course, and some agents, such as ACAT inhibitors, may have primary effects in all of these categories. As one goes from left to right, the benefit of each physiological effect becomes more speculative. There is no question of the benefit of LDL reduction, but less evidence exists for the clinical benefits of HDL elevation. With regard to direct anti-atherosclerotic effects, most approaches have yet to gather clinical data of any type. Perhaps as a result, the degree of medicinal chemistry effort in each area to date declines as one goes from left to right. This situation is changing rapidly, however. As evidence supporting the HDL hypothesis accumulates and knowledge of how to elevate HDL levels grows, very exciting opportunities for medical advances present themselves. Likewise, the knowledge base for nonlipid intervention is growing and very rapid advances are being achieved with the plaque-imaging techniques needed for evaluating such agents in man. Such results can only lead to greater opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Thus, in the future, much greater research effort will likely be dedicated to HDL elevation and nonlipid approaches. Through these efforts, physicians of the future should be armed with several complementary agents that can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in all patient populations.

Short-term effects of treatment with simvastatin on testicular function in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

The effects of simvastatin 40 mg per day for 14 weeks on the pituitary-testis axis of 19 men with familial hypercholesterolaemia have been examined in a single-blind study. Simvastatin significantly reduced serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides by 45% and 30%, respectively, and significantly increased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 15%. The alterations, which were stable 4 weeks after the start of treatment, were not associated with any significant change in sperm quality, the seminal plasma concentrations of various sex gland products (prostate-specific acid phosphatase, polyamines, citrate, fructose, alpha-glucosidase), or the serum concentrations of cortisol, testosterone, LH, FSH, or prolactin. It is concluded that a short-term reduction in circulating LDL-cholesterol has no marked effect on testicular function or sperm quality.

Comparison between morning and evening doses of simvastatin in hyperlipidemic subjects. A double-blind comparative study

Previous studies have shown that simvastatin, a hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, reduces plasma cholesterol levels when administered once a day. In the present study, the efficacy and tolerability of a morning and an evening dose were compared. The dosages employed were 2.5 and 5 mg for 12 weeks. This investigation was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 172 hyperlipidemic subjects whose plasma cholesterol levels were higher than 220 mg/dl. During the study period, mean changes in plasma cholesterol level (from baseline) were -11% with the 2.5-mg q.a.m. regimen, -15% with the 2.5-mg q.p.m. regimen, -14% with the 5-mg q.a.m. regimen, and -21% with the 5-mg q.p.m. regimen. Each of these changes was statistically significant when compared with that in the placebo group (p less than 0.001). In addition, the reduction in cholesterol level was significantly greater with the evening regimen than with the morning regimen for both the 2.5-mg (p less than 0.05) and the 5-mg (p less than 0.05) dosages. The changes in triglyceride and high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in each group were not significantly different from those in the placebo group. There were no differences in the incidence of clinical adverse reactions among the various treatment groups. In conclusion, when simvastatin was administered orally once per day in the evening, it reduced cholesterol levels to a significantly greater degree than when it was given in the morning.

Dietary treatment for familial hypercholesterolemia--differential effects of dietary soy protein according to the apolipoprotein E phenotypes

Familial hypercholesterolemia, one form of type IIa hyperlipidemia, usually responds poorly to standard low-lipid diets. To define the responsiveness to a soy-protein diet in this disease, one homozygous and twenty heterozygous type IIa patients were submitted to a 4-wk traditional hypocholesterolemic diet followed by 4 wk in which animal protein was substituted with texturized soy protein. Soy was then withdrawn for a further 4 wk. No significant changes in plasma lipids were observed during low-lipid diets. The soy diet, however, caused a marked decrease in total (-20.8%) and low-density-lipoprotein (-25.8%) cholesterol and in apolipoprotein B (-14.1%). The plasma cholesterol reduction was higher in patients with apolipoprotein E3/E3 or E3/E4 vs an almost negligible effect on E3/E2. These results confirm that soy-protein diets can lower cholesterol in type IIa patients with familial disease. Data on the sensitivity of patients with different apo-E isoforms agree with recent hypotheses suggesting that soy proteins may activate B,E receptors.

Effect of simvastatin (MK-733) on plasma triacylglycerol levels in rats

The effect of simvastatin (MK-733), an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, on plasma triacylglycerol (TG) levels was studied in rats. Dietary administration of MK-733 (0.055%, w/w) for 7 days significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced plasma TG levels by 30.6% associated with a 44.3% significant (P less than 0.01) reduction in very low density lipoprotein TG (VLDL-TG) as compared to those in the concurrent control rats. Clofibrate (0.08%, w/w) also significantly (P less than 0.05) decreased plasma TG levels by 26.1%. MK-733 did not affect the triacylglycerol secretion rate (TGSR) during 0-1.5 hr after administration of Triton WR-1339, but reduced it by 33.9% during 1.5-3.0 hr. Clofibrate also decreased TGSR during 1.5-3.0 hr. MK-733 increased lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity in epididymal adipose tissue and thigh muscle by 36.3 and 55.0% respectively. MK-733 significantly (P less than 0.05) increased LPL activity in the post-heparin plasma by 21.5%, although it did not affect hepatic triacylglycerol lipase (H-TGL) activity. Clofibrate did not affect LPL activity in the tissues or LPL and H-TGL activities in the post-heparin plasma. It is considered that the mechanism of plasma TG-lowering effect of MK-733 is the removal of VLDL-TG by an increase in LPL activity in the tissues as well as a decrease in the TGSR.

Simvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use

Simvastatin, a chemical derivative of lovastatin, is an antihyperlipidemic medication that inhibits hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. Animal and clinical data suggest simvastatin is twice as potent as lovastatin. It lowers serum cholesterol by inhibiting hepatic synthesis of cholesterol and, more importantly, by increasing the number of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors present on hepatic cellular membranes. Simvastatin, when used at doses of 40 mg/d in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, significantly reduces total cholesterol (greater than 30 percent) and LDL cholesterol (35-45 percent) and tends to reduce triglycerides and raise high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. The agent is also effective in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia, familial dysbetalipoproteinemia, and nephrotic syndrome. Addition of cholestyramine to simvastatin enhances the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect to approximately 55 percent. Common clinical adverse effects reported with simvastatin use include headaches and gastrointestinal complaints. Transient elevations in serum transaminases and creatine phosphokinase have also been seen. Based on data currently available, the drug's clinical activity and adverse-effect profile are similar to those of lovastatin. Therefore, there is no need for formularies to contain both medications. To choose between the two, one needs to consider the incidence of adverse effects and the daily cost of each product when used at equally effective doses. That information is now now available and, until it is, a clear recommendation cannot be made. Simvastatin, presently marketed in several countries, is investigational in the U.S. but is expected to be available soon.

Effects of simvastatin (MK-733) on branched pathway of mevalonate

The effects of simvastatin (MK-733), a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on the branched pathway of mevalonate metabolism were studied in Hep G2 cells. The synthesis of cholesterol, ubiquinone and dolichol were examined using various radiolabeled precursors. The effect on DNA synthesis was also determined. MK-733 at a concentration of 1 microM potently inhibited the incorporation of [3H]acetate into cholesterol (84%) without affecting that from [3H]mevalonolactone. Under these conditions, MK-733 reduced the incorporation of L-[14C]tyrosine into ubiquinone slightly (14%), although it did not suppress that from [3H] acetate. The incorporation of [3H]acetate into dolichol was slightly reduced by MK-733. On the contrary, the incorporation of [3H]mevalonolactone into ubiquinone and dolichol was increased by MK-733. This apparent increase in incorporation was thought to be largely due to the higher specific radioactivity of the intracellular pool of mevalonate. The present study demonstrated that MK-733 slightly suppressed the synthesis of ubiquinone and dolichol in Hep G2 cells. However, the extent of their reduction was far less than the effect on cholesterol synthesis, suggesting that there were differences in substrate affinity between the enzymes participating in the cholesterol synthetic pathway and those in the ubiquinone or dolichol synthetic pathway. Furthermore, MK-733 did not affect DNA synthesis even at a concentration of 10 microM.

Simvastatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in hypercholesterolaemia

Simvastatin (epistatin; synvinolin; MK 733), an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, acts by decreasing cholesterol synthesis and by increasing low density lipoprotein (LDL) catabolism via increased LDL receptor activity. In patients with heterozygous familial and nonfamilial hypercholesterolaemia, orally administered simvastatin 10 to 40mg once daily reduces plasma total and LDL-cholesterol concentrations by about 30 to 45%. It also produces a beneficial moderate decrease in plasma triglycerides and a small, although significant, increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. Like many other hypocholesterolaemic agents simvastatin does not appear useful in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia who lack LDL receptors. The hypocholesterolaemic activity of simvastatin is greater than that of the bile acid sequestrants, probucol and the fibrates. Combined administration of simvastatin with bile acid sequestrants results in further reductions in plasma cholesterol levels beyond those seen with either drug alone. Simvastatin appears well tolerated in the short to medium term, but its long term tolerability needs to be confirmed. No comparisons of simvastatin and other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have been reported. As yet there have been few investigations to determine the impact of simvastatin or other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on cardiovascular events relative to their hypocholesterolaemic effects, but at least one such trial is ongoing. Simvastatin, like other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, has considerable potential advantages over other classes of hypocholesterolaemic agents, i.e. the magnitude of its cholesterol-lowering effect and convenience of administration. If further study confirms long term tolerability and an impact on cardiac mortality and morbidity, then simvastatin and others of its class should offer a significant new approach to the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.