Nelfinavir. A review of its therapeutic efficacy in HIV infection

Phenotypic HIV-1 Resistance Correlates with Treatment Outcome of Nelfinavir Salvage Therapy

In order to analyse whether drug sensitivity testing would be beneficial for clinical decision-making in heavily pretreated patients, we retrospectively studied viral genotype and phenotypic drug resistance in 12 HIV-1-infected patients, each of them with a history of failing at least one therapeutic regimen including one or two protease inhibitors (PIs). The salvage therapy included nelfinavir as new PI in all cases. Four patients showed a sustained and five patients a transient viral load decrease. Three patients failed to show a significant decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA. In the baseline samples of these cases, resistance against all components of their combination therapy could be detected, whereas at least one antiretroviral drug was still active in the cases with transient treatment response. All patients with sustained therapy response harboured viruses that were either fully sensitive or resistant to only one of the drugs administered. In our study, phenotypic drug resistance was predictive for the success of antiretroviral salvage regimens.

Rapid determination of rat hepatocyte mRNA induction potential using oligonucleotide probes for CYP1A1, 1A2, 3A and 4A1

1. A new assay to quantify mRNA levels in small numbers of rat hepatocytes has been developed for cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms 1A1, 1A2, 3A and 4A1. The assay uses sets of oligonucleotide probes end-labelled with [35S]-dATP to hybridize to mRNA in control- or drug-treated rat hepatocytes cultured on Cytostar-T 96-well scintillating microplates. 2. The rat hepatocyte induction potential (RHIP) assays for CYP3A, 1A1, 1A2 and 4A1 are sensitive and selective and have an excellent qualitative relationship with CYP induction data ex vivo. The robustness of the CYP3A assay was determined following a run of > 40 plates. The variation of the dexamethasone (DEX) response on each plate, calculated as %coefficient of variation, showed that there was no significant difference between the variability of the response to DEX. 3. Assay specificity for each CYP isoform was achieved by designing probes (four per isoform) antisense to coding regions of each CYP gene sequence. In the CYP3A RHIP assay, pregnenalone 16alpha-carbonitrile (PCN), DEX, clotrimazole (CLOT) and miconazole (MIC) were all good inducers of CYP3A mRNA; beta-napthoflavone (BNF) and methylclofenapate (MCP), however, did not induce CYP3A mRNA, further defining the specificity of this methodology. Specificity was similarly confirmed for the other CYP isoforms. 4. Ind50, the concentration of inducer required to elicit a 50% induction of CYP-specific mRNA, was derived for prototypical CYP inducers: BNF 0.54 and 0.17 microM (CYP1A1 and 1A2 respectively), 3-methylcholanthrene (3MC) 0.11 and 0.04 microM (CYP1A1 and 1A2 respectively), PCN 0.03 microM, DEX 0.17 microM, CLOT 0.48 microM, MIC 3 microM, TAO 3 microM (CYP3A), MCP 1.8 microM, clofibrate (CLOF) 65 microM and ciprofibrate (CIP) 1.9 microM (CYP4A1). Ind50 for BNF and 3MC at CYP1A2 was 3-fold lower than that at CYP1A1 indicating a subfamily difference in inducer potency. 5. Reducing the numbers of animals and the amount of compound required to study CYP induction is an important advantage of the RHIP assays over conventional evaluations in vivo. Typically four rats are dosed for 4 days using oral doses in the range 50-500 mg kg(-1) day(-1). In comparison, the amount of hepatocytes required to carry out all the studies reported herein may be obtained from a single animal (< 2 x 10(8) viable cells) and CYP induction investigated using microg rather than g quantities of drug substance. 6. With appropriately designed oligonucleotide probes, the RHIP technology can assess CYP induction in human hepatocytes, which together with preclinical data can contribute to improving the quality of compounds progressing into the expensive process of drug development.

Adherence and drug resistance: predictions for therapy outcome

We combine standard pharmacokinetics with an established model of viral replication to predict the outcome of therapy as a function of adherence to the drug regimen. We consider two types of treatment failure: failure to eliminate the wild-type virus, and the emergence of drug-resistant virus. Specifically, we determine the conditions under which resistance dominates as a result of imperfect adherence. We derive this result for both single- and triple-drug therapies, with attention to conditions which favour the emergence of viral strains that are resistant to one or more drugs in a cocktail. Our analysis provides quantitative estimates of the degree of adherence necessary to prevent resistance. We derive results specific to the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection, but emphasize that our method is applicable to a range of viral or other infections treated by chemotherapy.

Nelfinavir: an update on its use in HIV infection

Nelfinavir is one of several currently available protease inhibitors used to limit viral replication and improve immune function in HIV-infected individuals. It is administered in combination with other antiretroviral agents. Nelfinavir has been evaluated as first-line therapy with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in treatment-naive patients, or as an additional antiretroviral agent in protease inhibitor-naive patients already receiving NRTIs. These studies have shown good efficacy in terms of HIV viral load reduction and increased CD4+ cell counts. When used in combination with NRTIs, nelfinavir 1250 mg twice daily produced similar results to 750 mg 3 times daily. The more convenient twice-daily dosage schedule, which is now approved in the US, may be beneficial in improving patient adherence to therapy. Nelfinavir has also been used successfully in combination with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, with or without NRTIs. Resistance to nelfinavir has been observed in vitro and in clinical isolates from patients experiencing insufficient or waning viral suppression during treatment. Nelfinavir primarily selects for the D30N mutation, which is not seen with other protease inhibitors, and alone does not cause resistance to other protease inhibitors in vitro. Several studies have shown that patients who experience virological failure while receiving nelfinavir can respond to salvage therapy with other protease inhibitors. Diarrhoea is the most frequent adverse event in patients receiving nelfinavir-based combination therapy, but was generally mild and resulted in minimal discontinuation of therapy in clinical trials. Diarrhoea can usually be controlled with drugs that slow gastrointestinal motility. Metabolic disturbances associated with protease inhibitor use (hypercholesterolaemia, hyperglycaemia and lipodystrophy) have also been reported with nelfinavir. Nelfinavir is associated with a number of clinically significant drug interactions and coadministration of some drugs (e.g. astemizole, cisapride, triazolam) is contraindicated. Coadministration of nelfinavir with other protease inhibitors generally resulted in favourable pharmacokinetic interactions (usually increased area under the concentration-time curve for both drugs).

CONCLUSION

Nelfinavir, in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and/or other protease inhibitors, is effective in limiting HIV replication and increasing CD4+ cell counts in HIV-infected adults and children. The convenience of its dosage administration, the low incidence of adverse events, and the potential for salvage therapies indicate that nelfinavir (as part of combined antiretroviral therapy regimens) should be considered as a first-line option in protease inhibitor-naive patients and in those unable to tolerate other protease inhibitors.

A randomized, comparative study of lamivudine plus stavudine, with indinavir or nelfinavir, in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare adherence and clinical outcome with two modalities of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in HIV-infected patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care centre in Spain.

PATIENTS

A total of 112 non-naive HIV-infected patients, recruited from March 1998 through August 1998, were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Triple drug therapy with stavudine and lamivudine, plus indinavir or nelfinavir.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adherence, side-effects, and immunological, virological, and clinical efficacy of treatment were assessed at 3-month intervals.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 9 months, 32% of patients in the indinavir group versus 50% of those in the nelfinavir group showed adequate adherence in all clinical appointments (P= 0.0559). Adherence was superior in the nelfinavir group in every visit. After 6 months of treatment 48% of subjects in the indinavir group and 70% of those in the nelfinavir group exhibited adequate adherence (P= 0.0311). After 9 months 35% of patients in the indinavir group and 59% of those in the nelfinavir group showed adequate adherence (P= 0.0291). Side-effects provoked discontinuation of treatment in 34% of patients in the indinavir group and 12% of patients in the nelfinavir group (P= 0.0073). Immunological and virological efficacy were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to a HAART regimen with stavudine plus lamivudine plus nelfinavir was superior to a regimen with stavudine plus lamivudine plus indinavir. Side-effects provoked more discontinuation of treatment in the indinavir group than in the nelfinavir group.

Efavirenz, nelfinavir, and stavudine rescue combination therapy in HIV-1-positive patients heavily pretreated with nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors

Tolerability, activity, and pharmacokinetic parameters of a combination therapy with efavirenz (EFV), nelfinavir (NFV), and stavudine (d4T) were evaluated in this study. Forty-seven HIV-1-infected study subjects, naive to NFV and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), who had experienced virologic failure while being treated with combination antiretroviral therapies including protease inhibitors (PIs), were enrolled. At baseline, HIV-1 viral load in plasma was 4.8 log10, CD4+ count was 204 cells/microl (both mean values); patients had received a mean of 3.1 different treatments (range, 2-5 treatments). Study medications were generally well tolerated; 7 of 47 patients (14.8%) were dropped from the study because of related drug toxicity. At week 24, mean plasma viral load (pVL) was reduced by 1.9 log10, with mean CD4+ count increased to 324 cells/microl (+/-59% from baseline); pVL was below the limit of detection (500 copies/ml) in 46.1% of patients. An extended follow-up study was performed at 12 months. Results showed a reduction of 1.7 log10 in pVL from basal values that was consistent with values observed at months 3 and 6. A history of previous use of PIs represented a negative prognostic marker. Sequencing analysis, performed in a subset of patients, showed the presence of multiple point mutations associated with PI resistance. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated a marked interindividual variability in NFV plasma concentrations, producing in 4 of 18 patients (22%) trough concentrations lower than minimum effective concentration. In pretreated patients, further studies are needed to characterize the pharmacokinetic factors that affect response to therapy and the association of these results with the 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95) determined by phenotyping.

Determination of nelfinavir, a potent HIV protease inhibitor, and its active metabolite M8 in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection

We developed and characterized a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of nelfinavir (NFV), a potent HIV protease inhibitor, and its active metabolite M8 in human plasma. Extraction of the internal standard, M8 and NFV from the plasma buffered at pH 9.5 was achieved by a liquid-liquid extraction with a mixture of methyl-tert.-butyl ether and hexane. Following two washes of the reconstituted sample with hexane, separation was achieved on an octadecylsilyl analytical column with a mobile phase containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid-acetonitrile-methanol (51:46:5, v/v). Detection was performed using an ultraviolet photodiode-array detector. The signal was monitored at a wavelength of 220 nm. The assay was found to be linear and has been validated over the concentration range of 25 to 3000 microg/l for M8 and 25 to 6000 microg/l for NFV, from 500 microl of plasma. Recoveries were 98.9% (SD 8.9%), and 100.2% (SD 11.7%) for M8 and NFV, respectively. Concentrations that gave a signal-to-noise ratio of three (15 microg/l for both M8 and NFV) were selected to determine the limit of detection. The lower limit of quantification (25 microg/l for both M8 and NFV) was defined as the concentration for which the relative standard deviation and the percent deviation from the nominal concentration were lower than 20%.

Oral absorption of the HIV protease inhibitors: a current update

Although the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors are highly effective, they are characterized by low and/or variable bioavailability with limited penetration into the central nervous system (CNS). Their clinical use is limited by patient compliance and by drug-drug interactions. The effect of drug solubility on their oral absorption has been investigated but further evaluation of this relationship is required. First pass metabolism appears to be significant for the HIV protease inhibitors and they are extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Recent studies suggest that these drugs are substrates for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump, which can limit their intestinal absorption and their transport across the blood-brain barrier. Drugs inducing or inhibiting CYP3A4 and/or P-glycoprotein may influence the bioavailability of the HIV protease inhibitors. The low bioavailability, variable absorption and drug-drug interactions of the HIV protease inhibitors may be related to the variability of cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein expression and to possible CYP3A4/P-glycoprotein interactions. To improve oral HIV protease inhibitor therapy, it is essential to mechanistically characterize the cell specific, tissue specific and regional intestinal dependencies of drug transport, secretory transport, metabolism and P-glycoprotein/CPY3A4 interactions. This report reviews the physicochemical characteristics and pharmacokinetics of the HIV protease inhibitors while considering the relationships between their hepatic and intestinal metabolism, low bioavailability, variable absorption and drug-drug interactions.

Transport, metabolism and elimination mechanisms of anti-HIV agents

Currently available anti-HIV drugs can be classified into three categories: nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors. Knowledge of these anti-HIV drugs in various physiological or pharmacokinetic compartments is essential for design and development of drug delivery systems for the treatment of HIV infection. The input and output of anti-HIV drugs in the biological systems are described by their transport and metabolism/elimination in this review. Transport mechanisms of anti-HIV agents across various biological barriers, i.e., gastrointestinal wall, skin, mucosa, blood cerebrospinal barrier, blood-brain barrier, placenta, and cellular membranes, are discussed. Their fates during and after systemic absorption and their metabolism-related drug interactions are reviewed. Many anti-HIV drugs presently marketed in the US bear some significant drawbacks such as relatively short half-life, low bioavailability, poor penetration into the central nervous system, and undesirable side effects. Efforts have been made to design drug delivery systems for the anti-HIV agents to: (1) reduce the dosing frequency; (2) increase the bioavailability and decrease the degradation/metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract; (3) improve the CNS penetration and inhibit the CNS efflux; and (4) deliver them to target cells selectively with minimal side effects. We hope to stimulate further interests in the area of controlled delivery of anti-HIV agents by providing current status of transport and metabolism/elimination of these agents.

Structure-activity relationship of HIV-1 protease inhibitors containing alpha-hydroxy-beta-amino acids. Detailed study of P1 site

The structure-activity relationship of HIV-1 protease (HIV-1 PR) inhibitors containing alpha-hydroxy-beta-amino acids is discussed. We demonstrated that substituent groups on the P1 aromatic rings of the inhibitors exert significant influence on their biological activity. Inhibitors bearing an alkyl or a fluorine atom at the meta and para position on their P1 benzene ring were found to be good inhibitors. We also discovered that the substitution positions of the P2 benzamides were crucial for good antiviral potency. In this study, inhibitor 48 was the most potent [IC90 (CEM/HIV-1 IIIB) 27 nM] and showed good pharmacokinetics in rats.

New developments in the treatment of HIV disease: An overview

The management of HIV disease has evolved into a complicated and sophisticated subspecialty in recent years. Fourteen drugs, in various combinations, are being used in increasingly complex treatment regimens. The side effects of some of these drugs, as well as certain drug-drug interactions may mimic signs and symptoms of HIV disease itself. Therefore it is imperative for the emergency physician to be knowledgeable about the new medications as well as about selected adverse effect and drug interaction profiles in order to be able to take care of the increasing numbers of HIV-positive patients presenting to emergency departments. This article aims to provide a focused review of these topics. In addition, health care workers with significant exposures to HIV-infected body fluids may present to the emergency department for initial evaluation. This presents a situation whereby emergency physicians may have to prescribe appropriate combinations of antiretroviral agents themselves. Thus familiarity with the basic principles of post-exposure prophylaxis is desirable and current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines are briefly reviewed.

Pharmacology of Antiretroviral Drugs

In this paper, an overview of the pharmacokinetics of currently available antiretroviral drugs is provided. Included in this article are the agents zidovudine, stavudine, zalcitabine, lamivudine, didanosine, abacavir, nevirapine, delavirdine, efavirenz, saquinavir, indinavir, ritonavir and nelfinavir. Key pharmacokinetic parameters, drug penetration in body compartments and drug interactions are discussed for each agent.

Peptides derived from HIV-1 Vif: a non-substrate based novel type of HIV-1 protease inhibitors

The retroviral protease (PR) is absolutely essential for completion of human immunodeficiency virus multiplication cycle, and cannot be replaced by any cellular function. Thus PR, like reverse transcriptase, is an ideal target for the development of anti-AIDS therapy. A large number of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) PR inhibitors have been developed, and several are currently used as anti-AIDS drugs. These inhibitors are mainly based on the natural PR cleavage sites within the viral Gag and Gag-Pol precursors. The major difficulty encountered while using anti-HIV therapeutic agents in patients has been the rapid emergence of drug-resistant viral strains. Most of the mutations which convert the PR into inhibitor-resistant are located within the substrate binding subsites of the enzyme. Recently, it has been shown that the HIV-1 auxiliary protein Vif, and especially the N-terminal half of Vif (N'-Vif) specifically interacts with the viral PR and inhibits its activity. We now show that efficient inhibition of HIV-1 PR activity can be achieved using Vif-derived peptides. Based on the above model we have performed peptide mapping of N'-Vif in order to find a small peptidic lead compound which inhibits PR activity. The screening revealed that peptides derived from two regions in Vif spanning from residues 30-65 and 78-98 inhibit PR activity in vitro, specifically bind HIV-PR and inhibit HIV-1 production in vivo. Further mapping of these regions revealed the lead compounds Vif81-88 and Vif88-98. These peptides specifically inhibit and bind HIV-1 PR, but do not affect pepsin and rous sarcoma virus protease. In contrast to other known PR inhibitors, these peptides are not substrate-based and their sequences do not resemble the sequences of the natural PR substrates (cleavage sites). Moreover, the Vif-derived peptides themselves are not cleaved by HIV-1 PR. Conversion of the lead peptides into small backbone cyclic peptidomimetics is taking place nowadays in order to turn these lead compounds into metabolically stable selective novel type of HIV-PR non-substrate-based inhibitors.

HIV disease treatment in the era of HAART

In the last three years basic science and clinical research have radically changed the therapeutical approach to HIV disease. Recent guidelines suggest that treatments to HIV disease should be early and aggressive, with the use of new potent antiretroviral drugs. This approach has been defined as HAART (highly active antiretroviral therapy). In this review we will discuss the main stages of antiretroviral therapy focusing on the acquisitions about results as well as problems of triple therapy.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) refers to a broad category of treatment regimens usually comprised of three or more antiretroviral drugs that, in previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients, are expected to reduce plasma virus levels below the limits of detection. Most HAART regimens include drugs from at least two of the three classes of antiretroviral therapy (nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, non-nucleoside analog RT inhibitors, and protease inhibitors). In deciding when to initiate antiretroviral therapy, physicians and their patients must balance the virological and immunological benefits of early treatment with the costs of drug therapy, the risk of drug side effects, and the risk of drug resistance if adherence is suboptimal. In previously untreated patients, HIV-1 replication can be suppressed indefinitely with certain HAART regimens. In previously treated patients, the benefits of HAART are often significantly diminished.