Evaluation of a radiation dose reduction strategy for pediatric chest CT

Ultra-low-dose protocol for CT-guided lung biopsies

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT) scans are a significant source of radiation to patients. It was hypothesized that technical success and complication rates would not be significantly changed by radically lowering the CT dose during lung biopsies with an ultra-low-dose (ULD) protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients aged 11-89 years who underwent biopsies of lung lesions were evaluated. Technical parameters were altered halfway through the study from the standard dose (140 kV localizing/100 kV subsequent guiding scans with auto-mA) to a ULD protocol (100 kV, 7.5 mAs) as part of a quality initiative. ULD studies were evaluated subjectively for image quality on a five-point scale. Patients' body mass indexes, total estimated radiation doses (dose-length product), technical success rates, and complications were compared between the standard-dose and the ULD groups.

RESULTS

Average radiation dose was reduced from 677.5 mGy·cm for the standard-dose group to 18.3 mGy·cm for the ULD group (P < .0001). In the ULD group, image quality was rated as adequate or better in 96% of cases. Pneumothoraces necessitating chest tube placements occurred in 10% and 6% of cases in the ULD and standard dose groups, respectively (P = .715). Technical success rates of 92% and 98% were obtained in the ULD and standard dose groups, respectively (P = .362).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation dose to the chest during CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies is reduced greater than 95% versus a standard protocol through the use of a ULD CT protocol without decreasing technical success or patient safety.

Accuracy and safety of high pitch computed tomography imaging in young children with complex congenital heart disease

Multidetector computed tomographic angiography defines anatomy in complex congenital heart disease, but radiation exposure and general anesthesia requirements limit its application. The aim of this study was to compare radiation exposure, anesthesia use, and diagnostic accuracy between standard-pitch, single-source computed tomography and high-pitch, dual-source computed tomography for image quality and risk in a clinical pediatric population. Consecutive computed tomographic scans were evaluated in patients aged <2 years with complex congenital heart disease. Two groups were compared on the basis of standard- versus high-pitch scans. High-pitch scans were further divided into variable pitch (2.25 to 3.0) and highest pitch (3.4) groups. Image quality, radiation exposure, anesthesia use, and diagnostic confidence and accuracy were determined. Sixty-one scans were reviewed (29 at standard pitch, 32 at high pitch). Body surface area, scan length, and indications were similar. The median dose-length product for standard-pitch scans was 66 mGy · cm (range 29 to 372) compared to 7 mGy · cm (range 3 to 50) in all high-pitch scans. The median dose-length product was 28 mGy · cm (range 8 to 50) for variable high-pitch scans and 5 mGy · cm (range 3 to 12) for the highest fixed-pitch scans. Diagnostic confidence was similar, although high-pitch scans had higher image noise and lower contrast-to-noise ratios. All high-pitch scans were performed under sedation with free breathing, and all standard-pitch scans required general anesthesia. Diagnostic accuracy was 100% in the 2 groups, with 17 standard-pitch and 16 high-pitch patients undergoing procedural validation. In conclusion, high-pitch, dual-source computed tomography provides excellent diagnostic accuracy and markedly reduces radiation dose, although image quality is mildly reduced.

Interruption of the aortic arch: diagnosis with multidetector computed tomography

PURPOSE

We investigated retrospectively the usefulness of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the preoperative diagnosis of interruption of the aortic arch (IAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven neonates with IAA underwent enhanced MDCT before a surgical repair operation between April 2006 and March 2010. The MDCT procedures were performed using either a 16- or 64-MDCT scanner without electrocardiographic gating or respiratory arrest.

RESULTS

High-quality CT images were obtained in all cases. One patient was diagnosed to be IAA type A, and 6 were diagnosed to be IAA type B (Celoria and Patton classification). The Celoria and Patton classification of IAA types and subtype classification by MDCT were confirmed by surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that the information from MDCT was sufficient for a preoperative diagnosis of IAA and allowed omission of a cardiac catheter examination before surgery.

Computed tomography angiography in children with cardiovascular disease: low dose techniques and image quality

Dose reduction techniques for computed tomography angiography (CTA) in children with cardiovascular diseases have the potential of reducing risks of radiation-induced cancer. To evaluate effectiveness of these techniques, both radiation dose and image quality must be compared. While clinically practical methods of estimating effective dose are available, there are no generally accepted metrics for the assessment of image quality in CTA. We introduce a measurable and reproducible image quality index, CTA QI. Using this index, along with calculated effective dose, we test the hypothesis that volume scan CTA delivers comparable image quality at substantially reduced radiation dose when compared to helical CTA. CTA QI is a measure of intraluminal contrast variation in three-dimensions, and it is calculated from standardized measurements of means and standard deviations of Hounsfield units in the thoracic descending aorta. From institutional database, 83 studies of CTA for thoracic cardiovascular diseases were retrospectively identified. CTA QI values were independently measured by two radiologists and compared using correlation. CTA QI and DLP-derived effective dose were compared for the following groups: non-cardiac gated wide-detector and helical CTA, ECG-synchronized retrospective wide-detector and helical CTA, ECG-synchronized wide detector retrospective and target technique CTA. Statistical significance was evaluated with the Student-t test. The correlations of CTA QI values between the radiologists were 0.83 and 0.92 for non-gated studies and ECG-synchronized studies respectively. Comparing non-gated volume scan CTA to helical CTA, there was a radiation dose reduction of 69% (P < 0.0001) without a significant change in CTA QI (1.4 ± 1.0 vs. 1.9 ± 1.4, P = 0.13). Comparing retrospective ECG-synchronized wide-detector CTA to helical CTA, there was a radiation dose reduction of 46% (P < 0.0001) with and improvement in CTA QI (1.0 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 3.4, P < 0.01). Comparing ECG-synchronized wide-detector target CTA to retrospective CTA, there was a radiation dose reduction of 68% (P < 0.0001, but at the cost of a significant reduction in CTA QI (2.0 ± 1.0 vs. 0.8 ± 0.4, P < 0.0044). CTA QI is a simple, reproducible metric of image quality suited for comparing CTA studies. Using this quality index, we establish that CTA performed with wide-detector scan techniques can yield substantially lower radiation dose without compromising diagnostic imaging quality. A wide-detector target technique can further reduce effective dose compared to wide-detector retrospective ECG-synchronization, but with a reduction in image quality.

Pulmonary embolism in pediatric patients survey of CT pulmonary angiography practices and policies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the current policies and practices of Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) members regarding the evaluation of pediatric patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) with an emphasis on use of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board exemption was granted for this study. Surveys were mailed electronically to the 1575 members of the SPR representing 416 institutions. Information gathered included the existence of written policies, the imaging study of choice for suspected PE, routine acquisition of chest radiographs before CTPA, currently used CTPA techniques, modifications of protocols for radiation dose reduction, typical DLP (dose-length-product) for CTPA, and estimated annual frequency of performing CTPA for evaluating PE in children. Survey items pertaining to policies and practices were compared between practice settings and populations using chi-square analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty members representing 118 institutions responded, which resulted in a response rate of 28% (118/416), on an institutional basis. Of these 118 respondents, 104 (88%) perform CTPA in children with clinical suspicion of PE. Of the 104 respondents who perform CTPA, 26 (25%) have a written policy for CTPA, 93 (89%) perform CTPA as the first study choice, and 67 (64%) routinely obtain chest radiographs before CTPA. The most commonly used CTPA techniques in children with clinical suspicion of PE include intravenous contrast amount of 2 mL/kg, mechanical injection of intravenous contrast, and tailored bolus tracking method for CTPA scan initiation by observing the Hounsfield units of contrast in the central pulmonary artery on the monitoring scan. Sixty respondents (58%) modify CTPA imaging protocols for evaluating PE in children in order to decrease radiation dose. The two most common modifications for radiation dose reduction were reduced mAs in 41 (68%) and automatic exposure control in 38 (63%). The majority of respondents (88%) did not know the typical DLP for a 20-kg child during CTPA study performed to evaluate for PE. A significantly greater percentage of radiation dose-reduction techniques are performed within academic institutions compared with private institutions (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Most survey respondents perform CTPA as the study of choice for evaluating PE in children, but there is considerable variability in their policies and practices. Respondents from academic medical centers are more likely to employ radiation dose-reduction techniques for CTPA than those in private practice settings.