KRAS mutation: comparison of testing methods and tissue sampling techniques in colon cancer

KRAS Testing: A Tool for the Implementation of Personalized Medicine

Activating point mutations in codons 12, 13, and 61 of the KRAS proto-oncogene are common in colorectal, non-small cell lung, pancreatic, and thyroid cancers. Constitutively activated KRAS mutations are strongly associated with a resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies, such as panitumumab and cetuximab used for treating metastatic colorectal carcinoma and EGFR tyrosine inhibitors used for advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Since anti-EGFR therapies are costly and may exert deleterious effects on individuals without activating mutations, KRAS mutation testing is recommended prior to the initiation of anti-EGFR therapy for these malignancies. The goal of this review is to summarize the KRAS mutation testing methods. Testing is now routinely requested in the clinical practice to provide data to assign the most appropriate anticancer chemotherapy for each given patient. Review of the most relevant literature was performed. Several areas were considered: ordering of the test, selection of the sample to be tested, and review of the testing methodologies. We found that several different methods are used for clinical KRAS mutation testing. Each of the methodologies is described, and information is provided about their performance, cost, turnaround times, detection limits, sensitivities, and specificities. We also provided "tips" for the appropriate selection and preparation of the sample to be tested. This is an important aspect of KRAS testing for clinical use, as the results of the test will affect clinical decisions with consequences for the patient.

KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer

The KRAS oncogene is mutated in approximately 35%-45% of colorectal cancers, and KRAS mutational status testing has been highlighted in recent years. The most frequent mutations in this gene, point substitutions in codons 12 and 13, were validated as negative predictors of response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. Therefore, determining the KRAS mutational status of tumor samples has become an essential tool for managing patients with colorectal cancers. Currently, a variety of detection methods have been established to analyze the mutation status in the key regions of the KRAS gene; however, several challenges remain related to standardized and uniform testing, including the selection of tumor samples, tumor sample processing and optimal testing methods. Moreover, new testing strategies, in combination with the mutation analysis of BRAF, PIK3CA and loss of PTEN proposed by many researchers and pathologists, should be promoted. In addition, we recommend that microsatellite instability, a prognostic factor, be added to the abovementioned concomitant analysis. This review provides an overview of KRAS biology and the recent advances in KRAS mutation testing. This review also addresses other aspects of status testing for determining the appropriate treatment and offers insight into the potential drawbacks of mutational testing.

Intratumoral heterogeneity of KRAS mutation is rare in non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Several lines of evidence indicate that mutational activation of KRAS is an early event in the carcinogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, previous studies report high frequencies of divergent KRAS mutational status between primary NSCLC and corresponding metastases. This suggests heterogeneity of the primary tumor in respect to its KRAS status. We therefore aimed to examine the frequency and the extent of such intratumoral heterogeneity.

METHODS

40 NSCLC were examined for intratumoral heterogeneity of KRAS mutation (20 adenocarcinomas, 10 squamous cell carcinomas and 10 large cell carcinomas). Three to eight different tumor areas were analyzed for KRAS mutation and up to four corresponding lymph node metastases were included for analysis in nineteen cases. A combination of different methods for screening of heterogeneity and its validation were used including direct sequencing, laser-capture microdissection for tumor cell enrichment and the very sensitive ARMS/S method.

RESULTS

Mutations of KRAS were found in 13/30 adenocarcinomas and large cell carcinomas. No mutations were detected in 10 squamous cell carcinomas. Four cases showed heterogeneous KRAS results by direct sequencing. More sensitive methods for KRAS mutation analysis revealed false negative results due to admixture of non-neoplastic cells in all of these samples. Intratumoral heterogeneity of KRAS mutational status was therefore confirmed in none of the analyzed cases. In addition, identical KRAS mutations were present in the primary tumor and the corresponding lymph node metastases in 19 cases examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral heterogeneity of KRAS mutational status is rare in NSCLC but highly sensitive tools are required to reliably identify these mutations. This finding is in line with the hypothesis that oncogenic activation of KRAS is an early event and a bona fide "driver mutation" in NSCLC. Furthermore, future therapies targeting KRAS will not be limited by intratumoral heterogeneity.

High-Resolution Melting Analysis as a Sensitive Prescreening Diagnostic Tool to Detect KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and AKT1 Mutations in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues

Context.—As the availability of targeted therapies for several tumor types increases, the need for rapid and sensitive mutation screening is growing. KRAS mutations constitutively activate the RAS/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and therefore play an important role in anti–epidermal growth factor receptor therapy for patients with colorectal cancers. Mutationally activated PIK3CA and AKT1 genes are promising therapeutic targets in breast cancer. In 60% to 70% of malignant melanomas, a mutation in BRAF can be found. Thus, the blocking of the oncogenic signaling induced by this mutation is now used as treatment approach.

Objective.—To establish high-resolution melting assays for routinely used predictive analyses of KRAS, AKT1, PIK3CA, and BRAF mutations.

Design.—High-resolution melting assays were developed by using specifically designed primers and genomic DNA isolated either from cell lines or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, oligonucleotides, or plasmids. Melting curve analyses were performed on the LightCyler platform and mutation analyses were additionally confirmed by Sanger sequencing.

Results.—We developed high-resolution melting assays by using genomic DNA containing the desired mutation, which enabled us to detect percentages of mutated DNA (3.1% to 12.5%) mixed in a wild-type background. Assays were evaluated by hybridization probes and/or Sanger sequencing to exclude pseudogene amplification. The high-resolution melting assays were validated with genomic DNA from different tumor entities. The concordance between Sanger sequencing and high-resolution melting was 99% for KRAS exon 2 and PIK3CA exon 20 and 100% for the remaining assays.

Conclusions.—High-resolution melting provides a valid and powerful tool for detecting genomic mutations efficiently.

Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist's perspective

Background

Sanger sequencing (SS) of PCR products is still the most frequent method to test colorectal cancer for KRAS mutations in routine practice.

Methods

An audit of SS on 1720 routine cases was carried out, taking into account age, gender, specimen type (resection vs biopsies), tumour site (primary vs metastasis), tumour stage, neoplastic cells abundance (>30% vs <30%) and fixation type (buffered formalin vs simple formalin). In a subset of 50 wild-type (WT) patients correlations between SS findings and response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also evaluated.

Results

The tests were informative in 1691 cases (98.3%). Mutations were detected in 671 cases (39.6%). No significant differences in mutation rates were observed with respect to age (p=0.2), gender (p=0.2), specimen type (p=0.3) and formalin fixation (p=0.08). Conversely, KRAS mutant rate was higher in metastatic tissue (50% vs 39%, p=0.02), in samples with over 30% of neoplastic cells (43.4% vs 26.6%, p=0.02) and in tumours tested in stage IV (p=0.05). The RR of SS KRAS WT patients was 26% (one complete and 12 partial responses). The disease control rate (objective responses plus stable disease) was 56%. Median PFS was 4.4 months and median OS was 10.4 months.

Conclusions

Pathological criteria that make SS a more robust method for KRAS testing and treatment response prediction are neoplastic cell abundance, metastatic tissue sample and stage IV primary tumour.

[Observational study on conditions for access to the analysis of KRAS mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving panitumumab treatment]

KRAS status is now a mandatory prerequisite in order to treat metastatic colorectal patients with anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) antibodies, such as cetuximab or panitumumab. KRAS mutations are unambiguously linked to a lack of response to these targeted therapies. Because of the major clinical impact of KRAS status, an observational study has been designed in France, focusing on the ability to perform KRAS testing between october 2008 and october 2009. The study was retro-prospective, national, multicentric, descriptive and non interventional, concerning public and private institutions and KRAS non mutated patients treated with panitumumab. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate delays between the genotyping KRAS request and the result. Secondary objectives were: type of genotyping requests (systematic/prospective or specific/retrospective), prevalence of the different genotyping techniques, delays between the genotyping KRAS request and therapy with panitumumab. Overall, 329 patients from 66 centres have been included. About half of them belonged to private institutions. The results were obtained with a mean delay of 33.4 ± 39.8 days (CI 95%: [28.8; 37.9] days; median: 24 days). Most of KRAS genotyping tests were performed on specific requests (65.3%), from a primary tumor (80.4%) and from a surgical specimen (73.9%). The more frequently used techniques for KRAS genotyping were: real time PCR (36.2%), sequencing (24.8%) and pyrosequencing (13.2%). This study emphasizes the functionality of cancer molecular genetic platforms dedicated to KRAS genotyping, which allow the use of molecular predictive biomarkers by different medical institutions. This study also underlines the broad spectrum of genotyping techniques (no consensus). The delays of response are still longer than expected but might be improved by optimizing the procedures.

A comparison of three methods for detecting KRAS mutations in formalin-fixed colorectal cancer specimens

BACKGROUND

KRAS mutation testing is required to select patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) to receive anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, but the optimal KRAS mutation test method is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a two-site comparison of two commercial KRAS mutation kits - the cobas KRAS Mutation Test and the Qiagen therascreen KRAS Kit - and Sanger sequencing. A panel of 120 CRC specimens was tested with all three methods. The agreement between the cobas test and each of the other methods was assessed. Specimens with discordant results were subjected to quantitative massively parallel pyrosequencing (MPP). DNA blends were tested to determine detection rates at 5% mutant alleles.

RESULTS

Reproducibility of the cobas test between sites was 98%. Six mutations were detected by cobas that were not detected by Sanger, and five were confirmed by MPP. The cobas test detected eight mutations which were not detected by the therascreen test, and seven were confirmed by MPP. Detection rates with 5% mutant DNA blends were 100% for the cobas and therascreen tests and 19% for Sanger.

CONCLUSION

The cobas test was reproducible between sites, and detected several mutations that were not detected by the therascreen test or Sanger. Sanger sequencing had poor sensitivity for low levels of mutation.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: beyond KRAS mutations

The advent of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), cetuximab and panitumumab has expanded the range of treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite these agents have paved the way to individualized therapy, our understanding why some patients respond to treatment whereas others do not remain poor. The realization that detection of positive EGFR expression by IHC does not reliably predict clinical outcome of EGFR-targeted treatment has led to an intense search for alternative predictive biomarkers. Data derived from multiple phase III trials have indicated that KRAS mutations can be considered a highly specific negative biomarker of benefit to anti-EGFR mAbs. Oncologists are now facing emerging issues in the treatment of metastatic CRC, including the identification of additional genetic determinants of primary resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy for further improving selection of patients, the explanation of rare cases of patients carrying KRAS-mutated tumours who have been reported to respond to cetuximab and panitumumab and the discovery of mechanisms of secondary resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. Current data suggest that, together with KRAS mutations, the evaluation of EGFR gene copy number (GCN), BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA mutations or loss of PTEN expression could also be useful for selecting patients with reduced chance to benefit from anti-EGFR mAbs. This review aims to provide an updated of the most recent data on predictive and prognostic biomarkers within the EGFR pathway, the challenges this emerging field presents and the future role of these molecular markers in CRC treatment.

KRAS genotyping in rectal adenocarcinoma specimens with low tumor cellularity after neoadjuvant treatment

KRAS status assessment is mandatory in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer before therapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies, as KRAS mutations are associated with resistance to this treatment. However, KRAS genotyping may be very challenging in case of poor tumor cellularity, particularly when major tumor regression is achieved in locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas after radiochemotherapy. We aimed at identifying the most reliable strategy to detect KRAS mutations in such samples. DNA was extracted from 31 surgical specimens with major tumor regression, following manual dissection, and from paired pre-treatment biopsies and analyzed by high-resolution melting. DNA samples displaying altered melting curve shapes were then sequenced. Samples with unmodified melting curves or wild-type sequence were further investigated by using an allele-specific PCR assay (TheraScreen) and laser microdissection (followed by high-resolution melting and sequencing analyses). In the 31 post-radiochemotherapy surgical specimens, seven KRAS mutations were identified by high-resolution melting analysis/sequencing. One additional mutation was detected by the TheraScreen assay and two mutations, including the one identified by the TheraScreen assay, were detected following laser microdissection. Altogether, 9/31 surgical specimens (29%) presented KRAS mutations. In the manually dissected pre-treatment biopsies, 12 mutations (39%) were identified by high-resolution melting analysis and sequencing. No additional mutations were found by using the TheraScreen assay or laser microdissection. These results indicate that, in the case of post-radiochemotherapy surgical specimens of colorectal cancer with low tumor cellularity, pre-treatment biopsies might represent the most cost-effective option for reliable KRAS genotyping. The use of more sensitive assays, such as allele-specific PCR or laser microdissection, can be envisaged but with higher costs and longer delays.

Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, techniques for tumor enrichment, DNA preparation, assay design and sensitivity. We evaluated comparability and consistency of KRAS test results among five laboratories currently being used to determine KRAS mutation status of metastatic colorectal cancer specimens in a large, multi-center observational study.

FINDINGS

Twenty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human colorectal cancer samples from colon resections previously tested for KRAS mutations were selected based on mutation status (6 wild type, 8 codon 12 mutations, and 6 codon 13 mutations). We found good agreement across laboratories despite differences in mutation detection methods. Eighteen of twenty samples (90%) were concordant across all five labs. Discordant results are likely not due to laboratory error, but instead to tumor heterogeneity, contamination of the tumor sample with normal tissue, or analytic factors affecting assay sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate commercial and academic laboratories provide reliable results for the common KRAS gene mutations at codons 12 and 13 when an adequate percentage of tumor cells is present in the sample.

Concordance in KRAS and BRAF mutations in endoscopic biopsy samples and resection specimens of colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

KRAS testing is mandatory if anti-EGFR therapy is considered in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). In addition, BRAF mutations seem to be an important negative prognostic factor. The aim of this study is to establish the concordance of KRAS and BRAF mutational status in paired biopsy and resection specimens of primary CRC using several analytic methods.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from paraffin blocks of 126 CRC patients. KRAS codon 12/13 and BRAF V600E mutational status was assessed using high resolution melting (HRM), direct sequencing (DS) of the HRM polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product. In addition, the Therascreen Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)-Scorpion KRAS assay and BRAF pyrosequencing were employed; both assays claim to require less tumour cells in comparison with DS.

RESULTS

KRAS and BRAF were found to be mutually exclusive. Mutation frequencies were 33.9% for KRAS, and for BRAF 19.0%, respectively. Concordance of KRAS mutational status between biopsy and resection specimens was 97.4% (ARMS), 98.4% (DS) and 99.2% (HRM), respectively. For BRAF concordance was 98.4% (Pyro, DS) and 99.2% (HRM).

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS and BRAF mutational status of endoscopic biopsies and resection specimens of CRC showed a >95% concordance. Endoscopic biopsies can be confidently used for molecular analysis.

Epidermal growth factor receptor pathway mutations and colorectal cancer therapy

CONTEXT

Rational anticancer therapy is beginning to expand the practice of surgical pathology beyond a primarily morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis into the molecular arena. Molecular testing of tumors can have both diagnostic and therapeutic value, which guides treatment decisions. This is true for colorectal cancer in which mutations in signaling mediators predict resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinically relevant mutations that currently guide treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer, summarize additional mutations that are expected to improve the prognostic sensitivity of molecular testing, and provide practical suggestions for submitting specimens for molecular analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed literature reporting pertinent clinical trial data, mutation analysis, and molecular mechanisms of drug resistance, as well as comprehensive review articles germane to the topic and published testing recommendations from the College of American Pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular analysis of colorectal cancer is now mandated before initiation of anti-EGFR therapy and directly impacts treatment options and outcomes. Familiarity with the mutations that determine utility and efficacy of therapy, as well as the importance of careful sample selection, will facilitate appropriate testing and optimize patient care.

Biomarker-based selection of therapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been re-classified based on molecular analyses of various genes and proteins capable of separating morphologic types of tumors into molecular categories. The diagnosis and management of CRC has evolved with the discovery and validation of a wide variety of biomarkers designed to facilitate a personalized approach for the treatment of the disease. In addition, a number of new prognostic and predictive individual genes and proteins have been discovered that are designed to reflect the sensitivity and/or resistance of CRC to existing therapies. Multigene predictors have also been developed to predict the risk of relapse for intermediate-stage CRC after completion of surgical resection. Finally, a number of biomarkers have been proposed as specific predictors of chemotherapy and radiotherapy response and, in some instances, drug toxicity. In this article, a series of novel biomarkers are considered and compared with standard-of-care markers for their potential use as pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic predictors of disease outcome.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer are associated with prolonged progression-free survival on pemetrexed

HYPOTHESIS

To explore whether the progression-free survival (PFS) with pemetrexed differs between anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive and other major molecular subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In an ALK-enriched population, patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were screened by ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization and for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations. Triple-tested, pemetrexed-treated patients (monotherapy or combination therapy) were identified and PFS with pemetrexed captured retrospectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine eligible cases were identified (19 ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization positive, 12 EGFR mutant, 21 KRAS mutant, and 37 triple negatives). Eighty-three cases (93%) were adenocarcinomas, two were adenosquamous, one squamous, and three had large cell histology. None of the ALK-positive patients had received crizotinib before pemetrexed. Pemetrexed was first-line therapy in 48% (72% as platinum-based combinations). Median PFS (95% confidence interval) data were EGFR mutant (5.5 months; 1-9), KRAS mutant (7 months; 1.5-10), ALK positive (9 months; 3-12), and triple negative (4 months; 3-5). In a multivariate analysis adjusting for line of therapy, mono- versus platinum and nonplatinum combination therapy, age, sex, histology, and smoking status, the only variable associated with prolonged PFS on pemetrexed was ALK+ (hazard ratio = 0.36 [95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.73], p = 0.0051).

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory analysis, ALK-positive patients have a significantly longer PFS on pemetrexed compared with triple-negative patients, whereas EGFR or KRAS mutant patients do not. This information should be considered when sizing randomized studies in ALK-positive patients that involve pemetrexed. Pemetrexed should also be prioritized as a cytotoxic to explore further in patients with known ALK-positive disease.

SWOG Cooperative Group Biorepository Resource: Access for Scientific Research Studies

SWOG (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group), a National Cancer Institute–supported cooperative group, conducts multiinstitutional, multidisciplinary clinical trials for adult patients with cancer, covering a wide range of solid tumors and hematologic cancers. The group has amassed a large set of biospecimens, collected from patients in numerous studies over many years and linked to clinical data. SWOG is now actively promoting the use of this unique scientific resource by making it available to a much wider group of researchers. This biospecimen resource offers material for research on disease mechanisms, genomic changes associated with cancer progression, markers of response and resistance to therapies, diagnosis or detection of recurrence, and more. By collecting, storing, and distributing the specimens, SWOG provides the framework for translational scientists to complete the feedback loop from “bedside to bench.” This article provides an overview of the group's biospecimen resources and guidelines for gaining access to them. Clin Cancer Res; 17(16); 5239–46. ©2011 AACR.

Emerging concepts in the pathology and molecular biology of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is traditionally classified histologically, but until recently, the histologic subtype has had little impact on the selection of therapy. Drugs such as pemetrexed and bevacizumab are indicated for specific NSCLC subtypes, and this type of stratification represents the first step toward individualizing therapy in NSCLC. Beyond histologic features, the status of molecular targets, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, has been shown to correlate with response to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory disease and in the first-line therapy setting. New therapies targeting the EGFR and other molecular aberrations are under way to help define specific subsets of patients responsive to certain molecularly targeted treatments. The role of pathologists in guiding treatment decisions will increase because molecular profiling, together with pathologic and histologic analysis, represents the future of personalizing medicine for patients with NSCLC.

A multiplex SNaPshot assay as a rapid method for detecting KRAS and BRAF mutations in advanced colorectal cancers

The analysis of KRAS mutations has become a prerequisite for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers. KRAS mutations are associated with resistance to treatment by monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab and panitumumab and thus are correlated with a shorter progression-free survival. BRAF mutations also may play a role in treatment decisions. The widespread use of these targeted therapies has generated the need to develop cost-effective methods for routine KRAS and BRAF analysis. The aim of this study was to compare a multiplex SNaPshot assay with DNA sequencing and high-resolution melting analysis for identifying KRAS codons 12 and 13 and BRAF codon 600 mutations. Thus 110 routinely formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were tested by each method. The SNaPshot analysis detected KRAS and BRAF codon 600 mutations in, respectively, 34.5% (n = 38) and 10% (n = 11) of these tissue blocks. These results were confirmed by direct DNA sequencing and by high-resolution melting analysis. The costs and time constraints of each detection method were compared at the same time. In conclusion, our newly designed multiplex SNaPshot assay is a fast, inexpensive, sensitive, and robust technique for molecular diagnostic practices and patient selection.

KRAS mutations detected by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assays strongly correlate with therapeutic effect of cetuximab

Background:

We aimed to compare the sensitive and quality-controlled KRAS testing with direct sequencing and to assess the impact on decision making of treatment.

Patients and methods:

We analysed genomic DNA isolated from macrodissected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens by direct sequencing and an amplification refractory mutation system–Scorpion assay (ARMS/S) method. Cetuximab was administered to patients identified as having wild-type (WT) KRAS using direct sequencing. Therapeutic effects were evaluated according to their KRAS status as determined by ARMS/S.

Results:

Among the 159 patients, the overall mutation rate was determined to be 37.0% by direct sequencing and 44.0% by ARMS/S. For the patients diagnosed as WT by direct sequencing and treated with cetuximab (n=47), a response rate of 16.0% was observed for 38 ARMS/S WT patients, whereas 9 ARMS/S mutant (MUT) patients failed to respond. The ARMS/S WT patients showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with ARMS/S MUT patients (PFS median 5.0 vs 1.7 months, hazards ratio (HR)=0.29, P=0.001; OS median 12.1 vs 3.8 months, HR=0.26, P=0.001).

Conclusion:

Sensitive and quality-controlled KRAS testing may provide improved predictive power to determine the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies.

Increased detection sensitivity for KRAS mutations enhances the prediction of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

KRAS mutations represent the main cause of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluated whether highly sensitive methods for KRAS investigation improve the accuracy of predictions of anti-EGFR MoAbs efficacy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated objective tumor responses in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab or panitumumab. KRAS codons 12 and 13 were examined by direct sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS, mutant-enriched PCR, and engineered mutant-enriched PCR, which have a sensitivity of 20%, 10%, 0.1%, and 0.1%, respectively. In addition, we analyzed KRAS codon 61, BRAF, and PIK3CA by direct sequencing and PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In total, 111 patients were considered. Direct sequencing revealed mutations in codons 12 and 13 of KRAS in 43/111 patients (39%) and BRAF mutations in 9/111 (8%), with almost all of these occurring in nonresponder patients. Using highly sensitive methods, we identified up to 13 additional KRAS mutations compared with direct sequencing, all occurring in nonresponders. By analyzing PIK3CA and PTEN, we found that of these 13 patients, 7 did not show any additional alteration in the PI3K pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of highly sensitive methods for the detection of KRAS mutations significantly improves the identification of mCRC patients resistant to anti-EGFR MoAbs.

A fast, cost-efficient and sensitive approach for KRAS mutation detection using multiplexed primer extension with IP/RP-HPLC separation

Mutations in the KRAS gene are very important diagnostic and prognostic markers in cancer. Particularly, KRAS mutations at codons 12 and 13 have a high prognostic value for EGFR-directed antibody therapies. Several methods are available to detect the most common mutations, some of them are commercialized. The most frequently used techniques, allele-specific PCR or direct sequencing, are not standardized and often lack sensitivity to detect low amounts of mutated tumor cells in paraffin-embedded tissue-blocks leading to a high number of false-negatives. Here we present a reliable, fast, cost-effective and sensitive approach for KRAS mutation detection that has a high potential for standardized large scale screening. The method is based on multiplexed primer extension reactions coupled to HPLC separation. The highly sensitive assay gives easily interpretable and reproducible results at affordable costs. We describe the method and an application example for diagnosis in early colorectal cancer screening.

Detection of somatic mutations by high-resolution DNA melting (HRM) analysis in multiple cancers

Identification of somatic mutations in cancer is a major goal for understanding and monitoring the events related to cancer initiation and progression. High resolution melting (HRM) curve analysis represents a fast, post-PCR high-throughput method for scanning somatic sequence alterations in target genes. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of HRM analysis for tumor mutation screening in a range of tumor samples, which included 216 frozen pediatric small rounded blue-cell tumors as well as 180 paraffin-embedded tumors from breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers (60 of each). HRM analysis was performed in exons of the following candidate genes known to harbor established commonly observed mutations: PIK3CA, ERBB2, KRAS, TP53, EGFR, BRAF, GATA3, and FGFR3. Bi-directional sequencing analysis was used to determine the accuracy of the HRM analysis. For the 39 mutations observed in frozen samples, the sensitivity and specificity of HRM analysis were 97% and 87%, respectively. There were 67 mutation/variants in the paraffin-embedded samples, and the sensitivity and specificity for the HRM analysis were 88% and 80%, respectively. Paraffin-embedded samples require higher quantity of purified DNA for high performance. In summary, HRM analysis is a promising moderate-throughput screening test for mutations among known candidate genomic regions. Although the overall accuracy appears to be better in frozen specimens, somatic alterations were detected in DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded samples.

Progress in metastatic colorectal cancer: growing role of cetuximab to optimize clinical outcome

The prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer remains poor despite advances made in recent years, particularly with new treatments directed towards molecular targets. Cetuximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 monoclonal antibody that targets the ligand-binding domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is active in metastatic colorectal cancer. As an IgG1 antibody, cetuximab may exert its antitumour efficacy through both EGFR antagonism and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The benefits of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer are well documented in clinical trials and are acknowledged in the approval and licensing of this agent. There is evidence of the role of cetuximab not only in irinotecan-refractory or heavily pretreated patients, but also of the efficacy and safety of the addition of this agent to FOLFIRI (irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, with an enhanced effect in 5-fluorouracil patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) wild-type tumours. In these patients, a recent meta-analysis of the pooled Cetuximab Combined with Irinotecan in First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRYSTAL) and Oxaliplatin and Cetuximab in First-Line Treatment of mCRC (OPUS) patient populations confirms that the addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy achieves a statistically significant improvement in the best overall response, overall survival time, and progression-free survival (PSF) compared with chemotherapy alone. In nonresectable colorectal liver metastases, cetuximab plus FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) or cetuximab plus FOLFIRI increased significantly resectability of liver metastases, including R0 resections. Also, preliminary data indicate that cetuximab can be administered in a more convenient 2-week schedule in combination with standard chemotherapy. Cetuximab is generally well tolerated. Acne-form rash is the most frequent toxicity. Up to the present time, the results obtained with targeted therapy combinations are not as encouraging as initially expected. The identification of biomarkers associated with disease control, including KRAS and BRAF mutation status in patients treated with cetuximab, is changing the current management of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clinical and molecular predictive markers of response are under active evaluation in order to better select patients who could benefit from cetuximab treatment, with the aim of both optimising patient outcomes and avoiding unnecessary toxicities.

Is high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) accurate for detection of human disease-associated mutations? A meta analysis

BACKGROUND

High Resolution Melting Analysis (HRMA) is becoming the preferred method for mutation detection. However, its accuracy in the individual clinical diagnostic setting is variable. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of HRMA for human mutations in comparison to DNA sequencing in different routine clinical settings, we have conducted a meta-analysis of published reports.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Out of 195 publications obtained from the initial search criteria, thirty-four studies assessing the accuracy of HRMA were included in the meta-analysis. We found that HRMA was a highly sensitive test for detecting disease-associated mutations in humans. Overall, the summary sensitivity was 97.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 96.8-98.5; I(2) = 27.0%). Subgroup analysis showed even higher sensitivity for non-HR-1 instruments (sensitivity 98.7% (95%CI: 97.7-99.3; I(2) = 0.0%)) and an eligible sample size subgroup (sensitivity 99.3% (95%CI: 98.1-99.8; I(2) = 0.0%)). HRMA specificity showed considerable heterogeneity between studies. Sensitivity of the techniques was influenced by sample size and instrument type but by not sample source or dye type.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

These findings show that HRMA is a highly sensitive, simple and low-cost test to detect human disease-associated mutations, especially for samples with mutations of low incidence. The burden on DNA sequencing could be significantly reduced by the implementation of HRMA, but it should be recognized that its sensitivity varies according to the number of samples with/without mutations, and positive results require DNA sequencing for confirmation.

Biased discordance of KRAS mutation detection in archived colorectal cancer specimens between the ARMS-Scorpion method and direct sequencing

OBJECTIVE

The concordance of KRAS mutation detection between the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay and direct sequencing was evaluated with clinically available formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of metastatic colorectal cancers.

METHODS

Genomic DNA from 120 macrodissected specimens was examined by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay and direct sequencing. DNA mixtures of wild-type and mutant KRAS genes were prepared from the peripheral blood and the SW620 human colon cancer cell line for the model experiments.

RESULTS

KRAS mutation was identified in 50 samples (41.7%) by the amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion assay and 42 samples (35.0%) by direct sequencing. Discordance between the two methods was observed for samples with smaller amounts of amplifiable DNA. The sensitivity of direct sequencing was impaired by the decrease in template DNA and polymerase chain reaction cycles in the experimental models.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased sensitivity of direct sequencing caused by insufficient polymerase chain reaction amplification resulted in biased discordance between direct sequencing and amplification refractory mutation system-Scorpion. Polymerase chain reaction conditions satisfactory for amplifying tens of haploid copies of genomic DNA to the saturation level might be necessary to ensure the robustness of the direct sequencing-based method employed for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimen-derived DNA samples.

Cytology-based gene mutation tests to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy: a review

Recent therapeutic progresses in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in colorectal cancer (CRC) are based on agents that specifically target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). To identify the patients most likely to benefit from such therapies, EGFR or KRAS gene mutation tests are mandatory, respectively, in NSCLC and in CRC. In patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, exploiting cytological samples for these tests avoids not curative surgery. Here, we review the studies that have applied gene mutation assays on cytological samples of NSCLC and CRC to select patients for anti-EGFR therapy. We argue that the standard of quality of gene mutation tests on cytological samples is closely dependent on the extent of the cytopathologist's involvement.

Optimizing the detection of lung cancer patients harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements potentially suitable for ALK inhibitor treatment

PURPOSE

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, associated with sensitivity to an experimental ALK/MET inhibitor, occur in 3% to 5% of non-small cell lung cancers. Intratumoral fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) heterogeneity has been reported. We explored the heterogeneity basis, the requirements for accurately determining ALK FISH positivity, and the effect of enriching the tested population using clinical and molecular factors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Lung cancer patients were screened by ALK and MET FISH and for EGFR and KRAS mutations.

RESULTS

Thirteen ALK-positive cases were identified from 73 screened patients. Gene copy number increases occurred together with classic rearrangements. All positive cases were adenocarcinomas, 12 were EGFR/KRAS wild-type, and 1 had a coexistent EGFR exon 20 mutation. No association with MET amplification occurred. ALK positivity was associated with <10-pack-year smoking status (P = 0.0004). Among adenocarcinomas, without KRAS or EGFR mutations, with <10-pack-year history, 44.8% of cases were ALK positive. ALK FISH positivity was heterogeneous, but mean values in tumor areas from ALK-positive patients (54% of cells; range, 22-87%) were significantly higher than in adjacent normal tissue or tumor/normal areas from ALK-negative patients (mean, 5-7%). Contiguous sliding field analyses showed diffuse heterogeneity without evidence of focal ALK rearrangements. One hundred percent sensitivity and specificity occurred when four or more fields (∼60 cells) were counted.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratumoral ALK FISH heterogeneity reflects technique, not biology. The clinical activity of ALK/MET inhibitors in ALK-positive patients probably reflects ALK, but not MET, activity. Prescreening by histology, EGFR/KRAS mutations, and smoking status dramatically increases the ALK-positive hit rate compared with unselected series.

Phase II selection design trial of concurrent chemotherapy and cetuximab versus chemotherapy followed by cetuximab in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group study S0342

PURPOSE

Randomized clinical trials failed to show a survival benefit for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus concurrent chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with preclinical data suggesting potential negative interactions. In contrast, pilot trials of the EGFR-targeted antibody, cetuximab, plus chemotherapy suggested enhanced antitumor activity. This randomized phase II trial was designed to select a cetuximab plus chemotherapy regimen for phase III evaluation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with advanced-stage NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6) every 3 weeks plus concurrent cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) loading dose followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly) for four cycles followed by maintenance cetuximab or sequential paclitaxel-carboplatin for four cycles followed by cetuximab.

RESULTS

Of 242 patients enrolled, 224 were eligible and assessable for response (106 and 118 patients in the concurrent and sequential arms, respectively). With a median follow-up time of 32 months, the median overall survival was 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 13.0 months) for patients receiving concurrent therapy and 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.5 to 12.8 months) for patients receiving sequential therapy (P = .57); 1-year survival rates were 45% (95% CI, 36% to 54%) and 44% (95% CI, 35% to 53%), respectively. Response rates and progression-free survival times were similar in both arms, as was grade 3 rash, whereas sensory neuropathy was higher in the concurrent arm (15% v 5% in the sequential arm; P = .036).

CONCLUSION

Although both regimens met the efficacy criterion for continued evaluation, the concurrent regimen of paclitaxel/carboplatin plus cetuximab was chosen.

Identification of predictive markers of response to the MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in K-ras-mutated colorectal cancer

Mutant K-ras activity leads to the activation of the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in approximately 44% of colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors. Accordingly, several inhibitors of the MEK pathway are under clinical evaluation in several malignancies including CRC. The aim of this study was to develop and characterize predictive biomarkers of response to the MEK1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 in CRC in order to maximize the clinical utility of this agent. Twenty-seven human CRC cell lines were exposed to AZD6244 and classified according to the IC(50) value as sensitive (≤ 0.1 μmol/L) or resistant (>1 μmol/L). All cell lines were subjected to immunoblotting for effector proteins, K-ras/BRAF mutation status, and baseline gene array analysis. Further testing was done in cell line xenografts and K-ras mutant CRC human explants models to develop a predictive genomic classifier for AZD6244. The most sensitive and resistant cell lines were subjected to differential gene array and pathway analyses. Members of the Wnt signaling pathway were highly overexpressed in cell lines resistant to AZD6244 and seem to be functionally involved in mediating resistance by shRNA knockdown studies. Baseline gene array data from CRC cell lines and xenografts were used to develop a k-top scoring pair (k-TSP) classifier, which predicted with 71% accuracy which of a test set of patient-derived K-ras mutant CRC explants would respond to AZD6244, providing the basis for a patient-selective clinical trial. These results also indicate that resistance to AZD6244 may be mediated, in part, by the upregulation of the Wnt pathway, suggesting potential rational combination partners for AZD6244 in CRC.

Biomarker-based prediction of response to therapy for colorectal cancer: current perspective

The diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been impacted by the discovery and validation of a wide variety of biomarkers designed to facilitate a personalized approach for the treatment of the disease. Recently, CRC has been reclassified based on molecular analyses of various genes and proteins capable of separating morphologic types of tumors into molecular categories. At the same time, a number of new prognostic and predictive single genes and proteins have been discovered that are designed to reflect sensitivity and/or resistance to existing therapies. Multigene predictors have also been developed to predict the risk of relapse for intermediate-stage CRC after completion of surgical extirpation. More recently, a number of biomarkers tested by a variety of methods have been proposed as specific predictors of chemotherapy and radiotherapy response. Other markers have been successfully used to predict toxic effects of standard therapies. In this review, a series of novel biomarkers are considered and compared with standard-of-care markers for their potential use as pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic predictors of disease outcome.

Detection of KRAS mutations in colorectal carcinoma patients with an integrated PCR/sequencing and real-time PCR approach

Aims: Patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) carrying activating mutations of the KRAS gene do not benefit from treatment with anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, KRAS mutation testing of mCRC patients is mandatory in the clinical setting to aid in the choice of appropriate therapy. Materials & methods: We developed a cost-effective approach for the determination of KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 in clinical practice based on a sensitive PCR/sequencing technique and the commercially available real-time PCR-based Therascreen® kit (DxS Ltd). Results & conclusion: The PCR/sequencing test was able to detect 10% mutant DNA in a background of wild-type DNA. By using this assay, we determined the mutational status of KRAS in 527 out of 540 (97.6%) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from mCRC patients. PCR/sequencing was not conclusive in 13 cases, in which low-intensity peaks suggestive of potential mutations were identified. The DxS assay, which showed a sensitivity of 1%, identified mutations in 11 out of 13 inconclusive cases. Interestingly, five of these 11 cases showed high levels of DNA fragmentation. No significant difference was found in the ability of PCR/sequencing and DxS to identify KRAS mutations within 160 cases with more than 30% tumor cells. However, in 24 samples with less than 30% tumor cells, DxS showed an higher sensitivity. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCR/sequencing can be used for mutational analysis of the majority of tumor samples that have more than 30% tumor cell content, whereas more sensitive and expensive tests should be reserved for inconclusive cases and for samples with a low amount of tumor cells.

Development of an integrated genomic classifier for a novel agent in colorectal cancer: approach to individualized therapy in early development

BACKGROUND

A plethora of agents is in early stages of development for colorectal cancer (CRC), including those that target the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGFIR) pathway. In the current environment of numerous cancer targets, it is imperative that patient selection strategies be developed with the intent of preliminary testing in the latter stages of phase I trials. The goal of this study was to develop and characterize predictive biomarkers for an IGFIR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, OSI-906, that could be applied in CRC-specific studies of this agent.

METHODS

Twenty-seven CRC cell lines were exposed to OSI-906 and classified according to IC(50) value as sensitive (5 micromol/L). Cell lines were subjected to immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry for effector proteins, IGFIR copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization, KRAS/BRAF/phosphoinositide 3-kinase mutation status, and baseline gene array analysis. The most sensitive and resistant cell lines were used for gene array and pathway analyses, along with shRNA knockdown of highly ranked genes. The resulting integrated genomic classifier was then tested against eight human CRC explants in vivo.

RESULTS

Baseline gene array data from cell lines and xenografts were used to develop a k-top scoring pair (k-TSP) classifier, which, in combination with IGFIR fluorescence in situ hybridization and KRAS mutational status, was able to predict with 100% accuracy a test set of patient-derived CRC xenografts.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that an integrated approach to the development of individualized therapy is feasible and should be applied early in the development of novel agents, ideally in conjunction with late-stage phase I trials.

Assessment of the in vivo antitumor effects of ENMD-2076, a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor, against primary and cell line-derived human colorectal cancer xenograft models

PURPOSE

This in vivo study was designed to investigate the efficacy of ENMD-2076, a small-molecule kinase inhibitor with activity against the Aurora kinases A and B, and several other tyrosine kinases linked to cancer, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, cKit, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, against murine xenograft models of human colorectal cancer (CRC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

HT-29 CRC cell line xenografts were treated with either vehicle or ENMD-2076 (100 or 200 mg/kg) orally daily for 28 days. Tumor growth inhibition, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, and (18)FDG-positron emission tomography were conducted to assess the antiproliferative, antiangiogenic, and antimetabolic responses, respectively. Effects on proliferation were also analyzed by immunohistochemical methods. Additionally, three patient-derived xenografts from primary and metastatic sites were treated with ENMD-2076 (100 mg/kg) and assessed for tumor growth inhibition.

RESULTS

In the HT-29 xenograft model, ENMD-2076 induced initial tumor growth inhibition followed by regression. Treatment was associated with significant tumor blanching, indicating a loss of vascularity and substantial reductions in tumor vascular permeability and perfusion as measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Positron emission tomography scanning showed significant decreases in (18)FDG uptake at days 3 and 21 of treatment, which was associated with a marked reduction in proliferation as assessed by Ki-67. All three of the patient-derived xenografts tested were sensitive to treatment with ENMD 2076 as measured by tumor growth inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

ENMD-2076 showed robust antitumor activity against cell line and patient-derived xenograft models of CRC that is detectable by functional imaging, supporting clinical investigation of this agent in CRC.