PET/MRI Versus PET/CT for Whole-Body Staging: Results from a Single-Center Observational Study on 1,003 Sequential Examinations

Spinal nerve signal intensity on Dixon T2-weighted water-only sequence: an important outcome predictor after lumbar transforaminal epidural injection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of Dixon T2-weighted water-fat separation technique in predicting the outcome of lumbar transforaminal epidural injections (TFESIs).

METHODS

Patients who underwent TFESI of a single spinal nerve within 3 months after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam between August 2018 and April 2020 were identified. The patients were classified into positive or negative outcome groups based on the response to the TFESI procedure. Two musculoskeletal radiologists measured the signal intensity of the injected side spinal nerves, contralateral side spinal nerves, and subcutaneous fat on axial Dixon T2-weighted water-only images, and the diameter of spinal nerve on axial Dixon T2-weighted in-phase images of the pre-procedural MRI. The measured values of the injected side spinal nerves were compared between the two groups and with the contralateral side spinal nerve.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were included, 76 in the positive outcome group and 18 in the negative outcome group. The mean signal intensity and the nerve-to-fat signal ratio of the injected side spinal nerve were significantly higher in the positive outcome group than in the negative outcome group (793.78 vs. 679.19, p = 0.016; 4.21 vs. 3.28, p = 0.003). In the positive outcome group, the diameter of the spinal nerve was significantly higher on the injected side than on the contralateral side (6.91 mm vs. 6.37 mm, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean signal intensity and the nerve-to-fat signal ratio of the spinal nerve on axial Dixon T2-weighted water-only images can help predict patient response to the TFESI.

KEY POINTS

• Applying the Dixon technique to lumbar spine MRI can help predict patient response to the TFESI procedure. • An increased nerve-to-fat signal ratio and mean spinal nerve signal intensity on axial Dixon T2-weighted water-only images predicted favorable TFESI outcomes.

Fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 for the Assessment of Acute Intestinal Graft-versus-Host Disease and Prediction of Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication that increases morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 (¹⁸F-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been demonstrated to be highly informative for evaluating and mapping of intestinal GVHD. To corroborate and extend existing findings and to investigate whether glucose metabolism assessed by ¹⁸F-FDG-PET might be an effective diagnostic tool to predict corticosteroid-refractory acute GVHD and overall survival. In this retrospective analysis, 101 patients with clinically suspected acute intestinal GVHD underwent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET between June 2011 and February 2019. Seventy-four of these patients with clinically and/or histologically proven acute intestinal GVHD as well as positive ¹⁸F-FDG-PET findings were analyzed in detail to assess the predictive value of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET regarding the response to immunosuppressive therapy and survival. Quantitative PET parameters, particularly the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), of patients with a fast response (ie, clinical improvement and decreased GVHD activity by at least 1 stage after 1 week of GVHD treatment) or slow/no response (ie, persistent disease activity for more than 1 week or increasing GVHD activity following first-line immunosuppressive therapy) were evaluated. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET detected intestinal GVHD with a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85% to 97%) and specificity of 73% (95% CI, 45% to 91%). Patients with a fast response to immunosuppressive therapy had a mean SUVmax of 13.7 (95% CI, 11.0 to 16.5) compared with 7.6 (95% CI, 7.0 to 8.3; P = .005) observed in patients with prolonged or no response. The median overall survival (OS) was 573.0 days (95% CI, 539.5 to 606.5 days) for patients with fast response versus 255 days (95% CI, 161.0 to 349.0 days; P = .009) for patients with slow or no responses. A SUVmax threshold >8.95 applied to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET performed within 100 days after transplantation identified patients with a median OS of 390 versus 117 days for patients with SUVmax ≤8.95 (P = .036). SUVmax threshold and donor type were independent factors for OS. Our results indicate that ¹⁸F-FDG-PET is highly accurate in identifying patients with acute intestinal GVHD and may predict responses to immunosuppressive therapy as well as survival, particularly when applied within the first 100 days after transplantation. These results provide a strong rationale to integrate PET imaging in future prospective trials evaluating new therapies for acute GVHD.

Additional Value of Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

Objective

To evaluate the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference.

Results

The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A_z]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]).

Conclusion

PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for local recurrence.

PET/MRI of the hepatobiliary system: Review of techniques and applications

Simultaneous positron emission tomography and MRI (PET/MRI) is an emerging technology that offers the benefits of MRI, including excellent soft tissue contrast, lack of ionizing radiation, and functional MRI techniques, with the physiologic information provided by PET. Although most PET/MRI systems are currently installed in tertiary care centers, PET/MRI technology is becoming increasingly widespread. The usefulness of PET/MRI varies by tumor type and organ system and has been shown to have utility in evaluation of primary and secondary hepatic neoplasms. Understanding the appropriate applications, techniques and relevant imaging findings is important for practicing radiologists considering or currently utilizing PET/MR for the evaluation of primary liver neoplasms, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as well as staging of biliary neoplasms including cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer, identification of liver metastases, and staging of neuroendocrine tumor.

Improving staging of rectal cancer in the pelvis: the role of PET/MRI

PURPOSE

The role of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) in evaluating the local extent of rectal cancer remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the possible role of PET/MR versus magnetic resonance (MR) in clinically staging rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective two-center cohort study of 62 patients with untreated rectal cancer investigated the possible role of baseline staging PET/MR versus stand-alone MR in determination of clinical stage. Two readers reviewed T and N stage, mesorectal fascia involvement, tumor length, distance from the anal verge, sphincter involvement, and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI). Sigmoidoscopy, digital rectal examination, and follow-up imaging, along with surgery when available, served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

PET/MR outperformed MR in evaluating tumor size (42.5 ± 21.03 mm per the reference standard, 54 ± 20.45 mm by stand-alone MR, and 44 ± 20 mm by PET/MR, P = 0.004), and in identifying N status (correct by MR in 36/62 patients [58%] and by PET/MR in 49/62 cases [79%]; P = 0.02) and external sphincter infiltration (correct by MR in 6/10 and by PET/MR in 9/10; P = 0.003). No statistically significant differences were observed in relation to any other features.

CONCLUSION

PET/MR provides a more precise assessment of the local extent of rectal cancers in evaluating cancer length, N status, and external sphincter involvement. PET/MR offers the opportunity to improve clinical decision-making, especially when evaluating low rectal tumors with possible external sphincter involvement.

18F-FDG PET/MR versus MR Alone in Whole-Body Primary Staging and Restaging of Patients with Rectal Cancer: What Is the Benefit of PET?

BACKGROUND

To investigate and compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MR and MR alone in whole-body primary staging and restaging of patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic accuracies of combined reading of PET/MR and MR alone in T, N and M staging against the reference standard. Inter-observer agreement regarding TNM staging was calculated separately for PET/MR and MR alone.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies of 34 patients could be evaluated. Diagnostic accuracies of PET/MR and MR alone were the same in locoregional T staging. For predicting N+ stage, the specificity of combined reading of PET and MR (0.917 and 0.833 for reader 1 and 2, respectively) was slightly higher than MR alone (0.833 and 0.75) without significantly increasing the overall accuracy (0.783 vs. 0.783 and 0.783 vs. 0.739). For detecting distant metastasis, the sensitivities of PET/MR and MR alone were shown equal (1.0 vs. 1.0 and 0.938 vs. 0.938), while the specificity of PET/MR was marginally lower (0.87 vs. 0.913 and 0.826 vs. 0.87). The inter-observer agreements were good to excellent in M (κ = 0.64 and 0.637 for PET/MR and MR alone, p < 0.001) and N staging (0.819 and 0.738, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PET did not yield a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy of PET/MR in TNM staging of rectal cancer, since MR alone facilitated accurate classification of disease stage with good to excellent inter-observer agreement.

Hybrid PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung nodules-a literature review

BACKGROUND

The use of hybrid PET/MRI for clinical staging is growing in several cancer forms and, consequently, PET/MRI has also gained interest in the assessment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and lung lesions. However, lung evaluation with PET/MRI is associated with challenges related to technical issues and diagnostic image quality. We, therefore, investigated the published literature on PET/MRI for clinical staging in NSCLC or lung nodule detection specifically addressing diagnostic accuracy and technical issues.

METHODS

The data originates from a systematic search performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library on hybrid PET/MRI in patients with cancer for a scoping review published earlier ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04402-8 ). Studies in English and German evaluating the diagnostic performance of hybrid PET/MRI for NSCLC or lung nodule detection in cancer patients were selected. Data reported in peer-reviewed journals without restrictions to year of publication were included.

RESULTS

A total of 3138 publications were identified from which 116 published 2012-2018 were included. Of these, nine studies addressed PET/MRI in NSCLC (4) or lung nodule detection (5). Overall, PET/MRI did not provide advantages in preoperative T- and N-staging in NSCLC compared to PET/CT. The data on M-staging were too few for conclusions to be drawn. The lung nodule detection rate of PET/MRI was comparable to that of PET/CT for FDG-avid nodules larger than 10 mm, but the sensitivity of PET/MRI for detection of non-FDG-avid nodules smaller than 5 mm was low.

CONCLUSION

PET/MRI did not provide advantages in T- and N-staging of NSCLC compared to PET/CT. PET/MRI had a comparable sensitivity for detection of FDG-avid lung nodules and nodules over 10 mm, but PET/CT yielded a higher detection rate in non FDG-avid lung nodules under 5 mm. With PET/MRI, the overall detection rate for lung nodules in various cancer types remains inferior to that of PET/CT due to the lower diagnostic performance of MRI than CT in the lungs.

Technical Improvements in Head and Neck MR Imaging: At the Cutting Edge

Head and neck MR imaging is technically challenging because of magnetic field inhomogeneity, respiratory and swallowing motion, and necessity of high-resolution imaging to trace key anatomic structures. These challenges have been answered by advances in MR imaging technology, including isovolumetric three-dimensional imaging, robust fat-water separation techniques, and novel deep learning-based reconstruction algorithms. New applications of MR imaging have been advanced and functional imaging has been improved. Improvements in acquisition and reconstruction technique facilitate novel applications of morphologic and functional imaging. This results in opportunities to improve diagnosis, staging, and treatment selection through application of advanced MR imaging techniques.