XELOX vs. FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis

Duration of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin for patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer based on the results of trials of 3 months compared with 6 months of treatment.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of relevant studies. The guideline recommendations were based on the review of evidence by the Expert Panel.

RESULTS

Pooled data from the six International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) Collaboration randomized controlled trials comprise the evidence base for these guideline recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations for therapy duration apply to patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer who are being offered adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine. Recommendations are informed by the findings of a recent pooled analysis of clinical trials that compared 6 months versus 3 months of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. For patients at a high risk of recurrence (T4 and/or N2), adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered for a duration of 6 months. For patients at a low risk of recurrence (T1, T2, or T3 and N1), either 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy or a shorter duration of 3 months may be offered on the basis of a potential reduction in adverse events and no significant difference in disease-free survival with the 3-month regimen. In determining duration of therapy, the Expert Panel recommends a shared decision-making approach, taking into account patient characteristics, values and preferences, and other factors and including a discussion of the potential for benefit and risks of harm associated with treatment duration. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Polymorphisms in DNA repair pathway genes and ABCG2 gene in advanced colorectal cancer: correlation with tumor characteristics and clinical outcome in oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

Objective

Multiple factors are involved in oxaliplatin-resistant process in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients including decreased drug accumulation and enhanced capacity to repair and tolerate DNA damage. In the present study, we aimed to assess the impact of six single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair genes and ABCG2 gene on prognosis in advanced CRC patients treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Methods

In this study, 580 advanced CRC patients were recruited. Six SNPs of DNA repair genes (XPA rs10817938, XPA rs2808668, XPC rs2607775, and WRN rs1346044) and ABCG2 gene (rs2231142 and rs2622621) were genotyped by using the TaqMan assay.

Results

Regarding interaction with environmental factors, ABCG2 rs2231142 and the first-degree family history of cancer and XPC rs2607775 or ABCG2 rs2622621 and lymph node metastases status demonstrated significant interactions. Of these six SNPs, XPA rs10817938 CT/ TT genotypes retained its significant association with longer overall survival (OS) (P=0.008) in CRC patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (n=580). Furthermore, a significantly better impact on the disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.001) and OS (P<0.0001) was found in ABCG2 rs2231142CA/AA carriers. Furthermore, ABCG2 rs2622621 CG/GG genotype was verified to be an independent poor prognostic factor in DFS (P=0.010) and OS (P=0.030). In the stratification analysis, XPA rs10817938 CT/CC, rs2231142 CA/AA, and rs2622621 CC genotypes of ABCG2 were predictive of significantly better prognosis in the patients with tumor differentiation grade 3 (n=523), clinical stage IV (n=73), or lymph node-positive status (n=557). Additionally, multivariate logistic regression and multiple dimension reduction analysis consistently revealed that the combination of selected SNPs and five known risk factors showed a better prediction prognosis and represented the best model to predict CRC prognosis.

Conclusion

The current data indicated that the XPA gene and ABCG2 gene had significant interaction with environmental factors and prognosis, which could provide a comprehensive understanding of the implications of those SNPs in the prediction of prognosis in advanced CRC patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Cost-utility analysis of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine for adjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy at concurrent time with radiation therapy (RT) or at adjuvant time alone in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is used with several regimens. The cost-utility analysis was conducted to compare administration of two 5-FU regimens and capecitabine in the aspect of provider and societal viewpoint.

Methods

Stage II or III rectal cancer patients who received pre-operative or post-operative concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were compared by using decision tree model between (I) 5-FU plus leucovorin (LV) for 5 days per cycle (Mayo Clinic regimen); (II) 5-FU continuous infusion (CI) for 120-h per cycle (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 protocol); (III) standard regimen of capecitabine. All probability data were extracted from landmark study. Direct medical costs were the cost from database of Drug Medical Supply Information Center, while direct non-medical cost and utility were interviewed from stage II and III rectal cancer patients. The time horizon of this study was 5 years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the final result in this study, which determined as the numerator of the difference of costs among three drug regimens, and the difference of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from each drug was the denominator.

Results

5-FU plus LV was the cheapest and least efficacy for adjuvant treatment of LARC in both provider and societal viewpoint. In provider viewpoint, the ICERs of 5-FU CI and capecitabine were 334,550 THB/QALY (US $9,840/QALY) and 189,935 THB/QALY (US $5,586/QALY), respectively, with the corresponding societal viewpoint of 264,447 THB/QALY (US $7,778/QALY) and 119,120 THB/QALY (US $3,504/QALY) when 5-FU plus LV was used as comparator. The most influential parameter for value of treatment was acquisition cost of capecitabine. At the willingness to pay for one QALY gained in Thailand (160,000 THB or US $4,706), 5-FU plus LV, 5-FU CI and capecitabine had probabilities of cost-effectiveness of 63%, 2% and 35%, respectively.

Conclusions

Capecitabine was the most expensive regimen but produced the higher effectiveness than 5-FU plus LV and 5-FU CI. The most influential parameter in the model was acquisition cost of capecitabine.

Cytokine-induced killer cells/dendritic cells-cytokine induced killer cells immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for treatment of colorectal cancer in China: a meta-analysis of 29 trials involving 2,610 patients

Purpose

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cytokine-induced killer cells/dendritic cells-cytokine induced killer cells (CIK/DC-CIK) immunotherapy in treating advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Results

29 trials including 2,610 CRC patients were evolved. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy with CIK/DC-CIK immunotherapy significantly prolonged the overall survival rate (OS) and disease-free survival rate (DFS) (1–5 year OS, P < 0.01; 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year DFS, P < 0.01). The combined therapy also improved patients’ overall response, disease control rate and life quality (P < 0.05). After immunotherapy, lymphocyte subsets percentages of CD3⁺, CD3⁻CD56⁺, CD3⁺CD56⁺ and CD16⁺CD56⁺ (P < 0.01) and cytokines levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ (P < 0.05) were increased, while CD4⁺, CD8⁺ and CD4⁺CD25⁺ and IL-6 and TNF-α did not show significant change (P > 0.05).

Materials and Methods

Clinical trials reporting response or safety of CIK/DC-CIK immunotherapy treating advanced CRC patients and published before September 2016 were searched in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Wanfang and CNKI database. Research quality and heterogeneity were evaluated before analysis. Pooled analyses were performed using random or fixed-effect models.

Conclusions

The combination of CIK/DC-CIK immunotherapy and chemotherapy prolong CRC patients’ survival time, enhanced patients’ immune function and alleviates the adverse effects caused by chemotherapy.

A Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Multiple Mechanisms of Hedyotis diffusa Willd. on Colorectal Cancer

Background

As one of the most frequently diagnosed cancer diseases globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains an important cause of cancer-related death. Although the traditional Chinese herb Hedyotis diffusa Willd. (HDW) has been proven to be effective for treating CRC in clinical practice, its definite mechanisms have not been completely deciphered.

Objective

The aim of our research is to systematically explore the multiple mechanisms of HDW on CRC.

Methods

This study adopted the network pharmacology approach, which was mainly composed of active component gathering, target prediction, CRC gene collection, network analysis, and gene enrichment analysis.

Results

The network analysis showed that 10 targets might be the therapeutic targets of HDW on CRC, namely, HRAS, PIK3CA, KRAS, TP53, APC, BRAF, GSK3B, CDK2, AKT1, and RAF1. The gene enrichment analysis implied that HDW probably benefits patients with CRC by modulating pathways related to cancers, infectious diseases, endocrine system, immune system, nervous system, signal transduction, cellular community, and cell motility.

Conclusions

This study partially verified and predicted the pharmacological and molecular mechanism of HDW against CRC from a holistic perspective, which will also lay a foundation for the further experimental research and clinical rational application of HDW.

New Trends in the Therapeutic Approach to Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Important developments in chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer over the last years are reviewed, with an emphasis on the most recently published data from clinical trials. The systematic review of current literature was conducted involving Pubmed Central^® research and full articles were obtained and analyzed when appropriate. Fluorouracil still constitutes the backbone of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment; fluorouracil combination plus either irinotecan (FOLFIRI), oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (CAPOX or XELOX) are chemotherapy protocols established as treatments producing similar outcomes. Actual treatment involves these chemotherapy protocols in combination with new molecular targeted drugs: bevacizumab and aflibercept (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody) and cetuximab and panitumumab (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody for patients with wild type KRAS) which confer significant survival benefits in select patients as first- or second-line therapies. The factors affecting the decisions for one treatment over other are related to the patient and toxicity drug. Finally, metastatic colorectal cancer patients progressing after all standard therapies (maintaining a good ECOG performance status) could be candidates for further therapies such as regorafenib and TAS-102. Regarding the future, promising therapies are under development for the metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and several agents are currently being evaluated in different clinical trials.

An Update on Randomized Clinical Trials in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma

There have been remarkable advances in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer over the past 20 years, chiefly achieved by development of new active drugs and establishment of effective systemic therapy regimens. Multidisciplinary care of resectable liver disease with use of perioperative systemic therapy and superior liver resection has resulted in prolonged survival of select patients. Median overall survival has significantly improved with the modern multiagent regimens. This article reviews recent high-quality randomized clinical trials that were conducted to address optimal treatment of advanced and metastatic colorectal carcinoma, mainly focused on initially inoperable metastatic disease.

FOLFOX regimen plus dendritic cells-cytokine-induced killer cells immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Purpose

To systematically investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin) regimen and cocultured dendritic cells and cytokine-induced killer cells (DC-CIK) immunotherapy for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

Publications reporting the clinical trials’ responses or safety of FOLFOX regimen combined with DC-CIK immunotherapy in treating CRC patients were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wanfang databases. Trials meeting the selection criteria were analyzed. The overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), tumor markers, immune function, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

Ten trials including 881 CRC patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. The combined therapy showed advantages over FOLFOX treatment-alone in 2-year OS (odds ratio [OR] =2.77, confidence interval [CI] =1.58–4.86, P=0.0004), ORR (OR =1.85, CI =1.34–2.56, P=0.0002), and DCR (OR =2.54, CI =1.76–3.67, P<0.00001), with statistical significance. After immunotherapy, lymphocyte subset percentages of CD3⁺ (P=0.0006) and CD4⁺ (P=0.01), CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio (P=0.0003), and levels of cytokines IFN-γ (P=0.003) and IL-2 (P=0.01) were significantly increased, whereas analysis of CD8⁺, CD3⁻CD56⁺, CD3⁺CD56⁺, CD4⁺CD25⁺, IL-6, and TNF-α did not show any significant difference (P>0.05). Moreover, the level of carcinoembryonic antigen was also decreased significantly upon immunotherapy (P<0.00001).

Conclusion

The combination of FOLFOX regimen and DC-CIK immunotherapy was safe and effective for CRC patients.