Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with standard open surgery for vertebral thoracic metastases causing acute myelopathy in patients with short- or mid-term life expectancy: surgical technique and early clinical results

[Usefulness of minimally invasive spine surgery for the management of thoracolumbar spinal metastases]

Objetivo:

Describir los resultados quirúrgicos y evolución de pacientes con metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares operadas con técnica mínimamente invasiva (MISS) utilizando para la decisión terapéutica la evaluación: Neurológica, Oncológica, Mecánica y Sistémica (NOMS).

Material y Métodos:

Se incluyeron en forma prospectiva pacientes con metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares operados con técnica MISS por el Servicio de Neurocirugía del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires entre Junio de 2014 y Junio de 2017. Se utilizó en todos los casos el algoritmo de evaluación NOMS para la decisión terapéutica. Se analizaron los resultados quirúrgicos postoperatorios como el Karnofsky performance status, dolor (VAS – visual analog scale), Frankel, pérdida sanguínea, necesidad de transfusiones, complicaciones, uso de opioides y días de internación. Se consideró como estadísticamente significativo una P < 0.05.

Resultados:

Durante el período de estudio 26 pacientes cumplieron los criterios de inclusión, de los cuales 13 fueron mujeres. La edad promedio fue 57 (27-83) años. El origen más frecuente de las lesiones fue cáncer de mama (27%). El síntoma más constante fue el dolor (96%), aunque 12 pacientes manifestaron inicialmente mielopatía (46%). Se observaron grados avanzados de invasión del canal con requerimiento de descompresión en el 65% de los casos. Acorde al Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score, 23 pacientes (89%) presentaron lesiones potencialmente inestables o inestables, requiriendo estabilización. Se evidenció una mejoría estadísticamente significativa del VAS en el 77% y del Frankel en el 67% de los casos tras la cirugía. No hubo necesidad de transfusiones. Se registró sólo una complicación quirúrgica leve (4%). La media de internación fue de 5.5 días.

Conclusión:

En nuestra serie y utilizando como algoritmo terapéutico el NOMS, la cirugía MISS resultó efectiva tanto para la descompresión como para la estabilización espinal, con baja tasa de complicaciones y rápida recuperación postoperatoria.

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression in the treatment of spinal metastases: A case report

RATIONALE

Spinal metastases are always associated with specific pain of back and limbs caused by nerve root compression. Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has been widely performed on patients with back and radicular pain originating from lumbar disc herniation, this minimally invasive surgery is rarely used for the treatment of spinal metastases.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 71-year-old woman with colon cancer and a known L3 vertebral body metastasis presented with significant progressive pain of low back and limbs.

DIAGNOSES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed the L3 vertebral body had been involved by osteolytic vertebral metastasis, which extended into spinal canal and compressed the dural sac and nerve root.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was treated with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and palliative resection of metastases was performed twice on both sides, respectively. After the minimally invasive procedure, the decompression of the dural sac and nerve root was ideal.

OUTCOMES

No complications during the procedure were reported. The minimally invasive surgery resulted in prompt and permanent pain relief until the patient died 6 months later.

LESSONS

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression could be an appropriate treatment option for the patients who suffer neurologic deficits that result from the spinal metastases.

Therapeutic Impact of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation on Palliative Surgery for Metastatic Spine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been introduced into palliative surgery for metastatic spine tumors; however, the therapeutic effects of PPS on the outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment for such tumors are unclear. Therefore, the therapeutic impact of PPS was investigated among patients with metastatic spine tumors and with revised Tokuhashi scores of ≤8.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 47 patients who underwent conventional palliative surgery (posterior decompression and stabilization, 33; posterior stabilization alone, 14) before the introduction of PPS and 38 patients who underwent PPS (posterior decompression and stabilization, 19; posterior stabilization alone, 19) were included. Surgical stress (operative time, blood loss, complications, etc.) and treatment outcomes (postoperative survival time, visual analog scale scores, Frankel classification, and the Barthel index at the final followup) were compared between the conventional and PPS groups.

RESULTS

The age of the indicated patients significantly increased after the introduction of PPS (P < 0.05). Regarding posterior decompression and stabilization, there were no significant intergroup differences in surgical stress or treatment outcomes. As for posterior stabilization alone, there were significant preoperative differences in various parameters between the conventional and PPS groups (P < 0.01) and also significant postoperative intergroup differences between surgical stress and treatment outcomes (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with early-stage metastatic spine tumors, the use of PPS-based posterior stabilization combined with multidisciplinary adjuvant therapy has changed the age range of the patients indicated for surgery and caused significant improvements in surgical stress, postoperative survival time, and Barthel index.

Patient-Oriented Aesthetic Outcome After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Observational Study Comparing Minimally Invasive and Standard Open Procedures

BACKGROUND

Despite recent treatment developments, back pain and related disabilities still represent a challenge for practitioners. Among the available surgical techniques, many different features and outcomes have been investigated; however, aesthetic result was missing among them. The present investigation was designed to prospectively compare patient-oriented aesthetic results after minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard open surgery (SOS) for the lumbar spine.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study with 1-year follow-up. Patients who underwent SOS were assigned to group 1 and MIS to group 2. Patient-oriented aesthetic result evaluation was collected using a dedicated visual aesthetic analogue scale. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used to exclude objective underlying influencing factors. The Oswestry Disability Index and a 10-point itemized visual analogue scale for back pain were administered to assess the clinical and functional status. Follow-up data were collected before discharge at 1, 6, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

RESULTS

We enrolled 74 patients, 44 in group 1 and 30 in group 2. The 2 groups were homogeneous for demographic and clinical data. No clinical or functional differences were measured at the end of follow-up. Visual aesthetic analogue scale reported greater mean values in group 1 at every follow-up time.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients seem to prefer the aesthetic result from a single midline incision after SOS compared with MIS. The use of specific techniques could be considered if there is scientific evidence reporting greater aesthetic outcome, having similar clinical and functional ones.

Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors Based on the Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Scale

Purpose

Minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screws plays a significant role in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. However, few studies have investigated surgical outcomes based on the epidural spinal cord compression scale (ESCCS). The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of metastatic spinal tumors as evaluated by ESCCS in patients treated by MISt.

Methods

The subjects were 56 patients who underwent MISt for metastatic spinal tumors, including 34 patients with ESCCS 2 or milder (group A) and 22 patients with ESCCS 3 (group B). We analyzed baseline characteristics, perioperative factors and clinical results such as postoperative survival time, neurological outcomes, Barthel Index for activities of daily living (ADL), visual analogue scale (VAS), and the rate of discharge to home.

Results

The baseline age (P=0.07), tumor diagnosis (P=0.23), spinal level of compression (P=0.35), American Spinal Injury Association classification (P=0.49), revised Tokuhashi score (P=0.92), spinal instability neoplastic score (P=0.28), VAS (P=0.35), Barthel Index (P=0.07), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P=0.76), and type of surgery (P=0.40) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The median postoperative survival time did not differ significantly between the groups (12.0 versus 15.0 months, P=0.60). Neurological improvement by at least 1 grade or maintenance of grade E was favorable in group A. Patients in group A had less posterior decompression (P=0.006), a higher rate of chemotherapy (P=0.009), a higher postoperative Barthel Index (P=0.04), and a higher rate of discharge to home (P=0.01) and no patients died in the hospital (P=0.004).

Conclusions

No significant difference was noted in the postoperative survival time between the 2 groups. Patients in the ESCCS 2 or milder group had favorable neurological improvement, higher rates of chemotherapy, better postoperative ADL, and the higher rate of discharge to home.

Anterior decompression and plate fixation in treatment of cervical myelopathy: A multicentric retrospective review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results on anterior decompression and fusion with titanium mesh or expanding cage and plate fixation in patients with cervical myelopathy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentric review of 114 patients, 75 males and 39 females, with cervical myelopathy who underwent surgical treatment between July 2009 to December 2011. All surgeries were performed via a ventral approach. Based on the type of surgery the patients received, they were divided into 3 groups: group 1 consisted of 49 patients who received multilevel corpectomies and fusion with strut iliac bone graft and plates; group 2 consisted of 26 patients who received multilevel corpectomies and fusion with titanium expanding cage and plating; group 3 consisted of 39 patients who received multilevel corpectomies and fusion using titanium mesh with autologous bone graft and anterior plating.

RESULTS

Decompression of the cervical spinal cord and grafting with plate fixation via a ventral approach demonstrated a high rate of improvement in neurological function with minimal complications. Fusion was documented radiologically in all cases. Eighty-three patients experienced a partial improvement and 41 had a complete recovery according to Nurick's myelopathy grading. Sixty-two patients were ranked as excellent, 48 as good, 4 as fair; unsatisfactory outcome was related to donor site complications.

CONCLUSION

Spinal decompression and fusion with titanium cages and plates appears to be a safe and effective alternative in patients with cervical spinal myelopathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Comparison between minimally invasive spine stabilization with and without posterior decompression for the management of spinal metastases: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Posterior decompression and stabilization plays significant roles in palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor. However, the indication for addition of posterior decompression have not been examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate a retrospective cohort of outcomes of metastatic spinal tumor treated with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) with or without posterior decompression.

Methods

The subjects were 40 patients who underwent MISt using percutaneous pedicle screws for metastatic spinal tumor, including 20 patients treated with stabilization alone (group A) and 20 patients with added posterior decompression (group B). We analyzed baseline characteristics, postoperative survival time, and perioperative factors such as neurological outcomes, Barthel Index, VAS, and rate of discharge to home.

Results

The mean ages were 70 and 66 years old (P = 0.06), the mean revised Tokuhashi scores were 7.2 and 5.8 (P = 0.1), the mean spinal instability neoplastic scores (SINS) were 10.5 and 9.0 (P = 0.04), and the mean Barthel Index for ADL were 65.5 and 41.0 (P = 0.06) in groups A and B, respectively. The median postoperative survival time did not differ significantly between groups A and B (12.0 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.09). Patients in group A had a significantly shorter operation time (166 vs. 232 min, P = 0.004) and lower intraoperative blood loss (120 vs. 478 mL, P < 0.001). Postoperative paralysis (P = 0.1), paralysis improvement rate (P = 0.09), postoperative Barthel Index (P = 0.06), and postoperative VAS (P = 0.6) did not differ significantly between the groups. The modified Frankel classification improved from D1 or D2 before surgery to D3 or E after surgery in 4 of 10 cases (40%) in group A and 8 of 8 patients (100%) in group B (P = 0.01). Significantly more patients were discharged to home in group A (P = 0.02), whereas significantly more patients died in the hospital in group B (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Patients treated without decompression had a shorter operation time, less blood loss, a higher rate of discharge to home, and lower in-hospital mortality, indicating a procedure with lower invasiveness. MISt without decompression is advantageous for patients with D3 or milder paralysis, but decompression is necessary for patients with D2 or severer paralysis.

Minimally invasive versus conventional spine surgery for vertebral metastases: a systematic review of the evidence

One of the major determinants of surgical candidacy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases is the ability of the patient to tolerate the procedure-associated morbidity. In other pathologies, minimally invasive (MIS) procedures have been suggested to have lower intra-operative morbidity while providing similar outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed library searching for articles that directly compared the operative and post-operative outcomes of patients treated for symptomatic spinal metastases. Inclusion criteria were articles reporting two or more cases of patients >18 years old treated with MIS or open approaches for spinal metastases. Studies reporting results in spinal metastases patients that could not be disentangled from other pathologies were excluded. Our search returned 1,568 articles, of which 9 articles met the criteria for inclusion. All articles were level III evidence. Patients treated with MIS approaches tended to have lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative times, shorter inpatient stays, and fewer complications relative to patients undergoing surgeries with conventional approaches. Patients in the MIS and open groups had similar pain improvement, neurological improvement, and functional outcomes. Recent advances in MIS techniques may reduce surgical morbidity while providing similar symptomatic improvement in patients treated for spinal metastases. As a result, MIS techniques may expand the pool of patients with spinal metastases who are candidates for operative management.

Clinical results of multidisciplinary therapy including palliative posterior spinal stabilization surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy for metastatic spinal tumor

Background

Surgeries performed for metastatic spinal tumor are mostly palliative and are controversial for patients with short life expectancy. We investigated whether palliative posterior spinal stabilization surgery with postoperative multidisciplinary therapy results in improvement of life prognosis and activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with metastatic spinal tumor.

Methods

The subjects were 55 patients who underwent palliative posterior-only instrumentation surgery for metastatic spinal tumor at our hospital between 2012 and 2015. Postoperative survival, early paralysis improvement, ADL improvement, and rate of discharge to home were examined.

Results

The patients included 37 males and 18 females, and the mean age at the time of surgery was 66.8 years old. The mean Tokuhashi score was 7.1, the mean spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) was 9.4, and the epidural spinal cord compression scale (ESCCS) was grade 3 in 20 patients (36.3%). The mean Barthel index for ADL was 48.7. The median postoperative survival time determined using the Kaplan-Meier method was 12.0 months (95% confidence interval 2.4–21.5). Regarding improvement of paralysis, the modified Frankel scale was improved by one grade or more or grade E was maintained in 35 patients (63.6%), whereas paralysis aggravated in 2 (3.6%). In surgery, conventional posterior decompression and fixation were applied in 31 patients (56.3%), and minimally invasive spine stabilization was applied in 24 (43.6%). Postoperative chemotherapy was performed in 31 patients (56.3%), radiotherapy was used in 38 (69.0%), and a bone-modifying agent was administered in 39 (70.2%). Regarding ADL, the mean Barthel index improved from 48.5 before surgery to 74.5 after surgery. Thirty-seven patients (67.2%) were discharged to home.

Conclusions

ADL improved and allowed discharge to home, and postoperative adjuvant therapy could be administered at a high rate in patients who received palliative posterior spinal stabilization surgery. Survival time extended beyond the preoperative life expectancy in many patients. Patients with a metastatic spinal tumor have short life expectancy and paralysis caused by spinal instability and spinal cord compression. However, multidisciplinary therapy including palliative posterior spinal stabilization surgery with reduced invasiveness and postoperative adjuvant therapy are effective in these patients.

Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Neoplastic spinal instability is movement-related pain or neurologic compromise under physiologic loads with the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) developed to facilitate diagnosis. There is a paucity of evidence that mechanical instability correlates with patient-reported symptoms and that surgical stabilization significantly improves these patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine if SINS correlates with patient-reported preoperative pain and disability, and if surgical stabilization significantly improves PRO.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution prospective cohort study was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 131 patients who underwent stabilization for metastatic spinal tumor treatment between July 2014 and August 2016 were included.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Preoperative baseline and mean difference in perioperative PROs as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) were the outcome measures.

METHODS

The SINS was analyzed as a continuous, ordinal, and categorical variable (Stable: 0-6, Indeterminate: 7-12, Unstable: 13-18). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman rank coefficient (rho), the Kruskal-Wallis test, and an extension of the Cochran-Armitage trend test. The SINS and association between the mean differences in post- and preoperative PRO scores was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant positive correlation between increasing SINS and severity of preoperative pain with BPI average pain (rho=0.20; p=.03) and MDASI pain (rho=0.19; p=.03). Increasing SINS correlated with severity of preoperative disability with BPI walking (rho=0.19; p=.04), MDASI activity (rho=0.24; p=.006), and MDASI walking (rho=0.20; p=.03). Similar associations were noted when SINS was analyzed as an ordinal categorical variable. Stabilization significantly improved nearly all PRO measures for patients with indeterminate and unstable SINS. Significant correlations persisted when controlling for neurologic status and were not affected based on the technique of surgical stabilization used.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-related outcome-based validation of SINS confirms this scoring system for diagnosing neoplastic spinal instability and provides surgeons with a tool to determine which patients will benefit from stabilization. Surgical stabilization of cancer patients with SINS consistent with mechanical instability provides significant reduction in pain and improves patient mobility independent of neurologic status and stabilization technique.

Metastatic Spine Tumor Surgery: A Comparative Study of Minimally Invasive Approach Using Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Fixation Versus Open Approach

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) has been gaining recognition in patients with metastatic spine disease (MSD). The advantages are reduction in blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. Most of the studies were case series with very few comparing the outcomes of MISS to open approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the clinical and perioperative outcomes of MISS versus open approach in patients with symptomatic MSD, who underwent posterior spinal stabilization and/or decompression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our study included 45 MSD patients; 27 managed by MISS and 18 by open approach. All patients had MSD presenting with symptoms of neurological deficit, spinal instability, or both. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected for comparison of the 2 approaches. All patients were followed up until the end of study period (maximum up to 4 years from time of surgery) or till their demise. The clinical outcome measures were pain control, neurological and functional status, whereas perioperative outcomes were blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, and time taken to initiate radiotherapy/chemotherapy after index surgery.

RESULTS

Majority of patients in both groups showed improvement in pain, neurological status, independent ambulation, and ECOG score in the postoperative period with no significant differences between the 2 groups. There was a significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (621 mL less, P<0.001) in the MISS group. The average time to initiate radiotherapy after surgery was 13 days (range, 12-16 d) in MISS and 24 days (range, 16-40 d) in the open group. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Operative time and duration of hospital stay were also favorable in the MISS group, although the differences were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

MISS is comparable with open approach demonstrating similar improvements in clinical outcomes, that is pain control, neurological and functional status. MISS approaches have also shown promising results due to lesser intraoperative blood loss and allowing earlier radiotherapy/chemotherapy.

A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Spinal Metastases

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess the invasiveness, efficacy, and safety of minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) for metastatic spinal tumor patients with short life expectancy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Conventional open surgery for metastatic spinal tumors has the disadvantages of significant blood loss, potential infection, damage to back muscles, and extended hospital stays. The minimally invasive spine surgery has changed the treatment of metastatic spinal tumors radically and fundamentally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 50 consecutive patients registered with the Keio Spine Research Group (KSRG) who underwent posterior palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumors from January 2009 to June 2015. Of these, 25 patients underwent MISt surgery (M group), and 25 underwent conventional open surgery (C group). The patients were assessed by demographic data, surgical invasiveness, complications, pain improvement, and neurological recovery.

RESULTS

The 2 groups did not differ significantly in baseline characteristics. The M group had significantly less blood loss (M, 340.1 mL; C, 714.3 mL; P=0.005), less postoperative drainage (M, 136.0 mL; C, 627.0 mL; P<0.001), lower rates of red blood cell transfusion (M, 3 cases; C, 10 cases; P=0.029), and a shorter postoperative period of bed rest (M, 2.0 d; C, 3.6 d; P<0.001), compared with the C group. The perioperative complication rates were significantly lower (P=0.012) in the M group (3 patients, 12%) than in the C group (11 patients, 44%). Neurological deficits and pain improved significantly and comparably in the 2 groups after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MISt is a less invasive and effective alternative surgery to conventional open surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. MISt should be considered as a valid option for the treatment of metastatic spinal tumor patients with a short life expectancy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Functional Recovery Following Early Kyphoplasty Versus Conservative Management in Stable Thoracuolumbar Fractures in Parachute Jumpers: A Randomized Clinical Trial

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the functional recovery between early kyphoplasty and conservative care in paratroopers with stable thoracolumbar fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Treatment of traumatic stable thoracolumbar fractures in young individuals is still a debate. Conservative management and kyphoplasty are options of therapy. But enough data are not available for supporting each.

METHODS

We included 70 paratroopers with stable thoracolumbar fractures (A1 and A2 classification according to AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system) presenting <60 days after trauma and hyperintensity in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Old fractures and those requiring fixation were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 study groups to undergo percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (n=34) or conservative care (n=36) by applying orthosis for 2 months. Patients were followed for 12 months and were evaluated clinically using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI).

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between 2 study groups. The VAS score and ODI decreased significantly in both study groups after 12 months of treatment. The VAS score was significantly lower in kyphoplasty group after the intervention (P<0.001), 1 month (P<0.001), 3 months (P<0.001), 6 months (P<0.001), and 12 months (P<0.001) after the intervention. In addition, the ODI was significantly lower after the intervention (P<0.001), 1 month (P<0.001), 3 months (P<0.001), 6 months (P<0.001), and 12 months (P<0.001) after the intervention. Kyphoplasty was associated with shorter duration of returning to parachuting (P<0.001) and shorter duration of absence from work (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early kyphoplasty in stable thoracolumbar fractures after parachute jumping is associated with less pain, better functional recovery, less days of absence from work, and shorter duration of returning to parachuting.

Minimally Invasive Separation Surgery with Intraoperative Stereotactic Guidance: A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

The treatment of spinal metastasis consists of algorithms combining surgical and radiation modalities. Recently the concept of separation surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery was shown to be a safe and effective treatment to achieve local tumor control.

OBJECTIVE

We examined a minimally invasive approach to separation surgery in a cadaveric study followed by a patient cohort with spinal metastasis using navigation to discuss our results and provide a technical note.

METHODS

A cadaveric study using minimally invasive access systems examined the feasibility of spinal cord decompression. Subsequently, 17 patients with spinal metastasis underwent minimally invasive separation surgery and instrumentation using navigation. All patients were at least 3/5 and pre- and post-operative CT scans were used to evaluate the decompression. Endpoints included neurologic function, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

The cadaveric study demonstrated adequate decompression of the spinal cord. For the operative cases, the post-operative imaging demonstrated excellent separation for safe stereotactic radiosurgery. The mean incision length was 4.9 cm. The average operative time was 6 hours and 48 minutes, the mean length of stay was 12.8 days and the mean surgical blood loss was 458 mL. The median Spine Instability Neoplastic Score score was 10 with a range of 6-16. All patients remained or improved their neurologic baseline with excellent pain control. One patient incurred a perioperative complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive separation surgery for spinal metastasis allows for circumferential decompression of the spinal cord and safe post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery. In addition, we demonstrated the efficacy of intra-operative navigation in guiding the resection.

Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spine Stabilization for Spinal Metastases

The goal of the study was to evaluate minimally invasive palliative surgery and the effect of postoperative adjuvant therapy for metastatic spinal tumor with a limited vital prognosis. Of the 70 patients who underwent palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor at the authors' hospital between March 2012 and May 2016, thirty-three were treated with minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) and included in the current study. Of the 33 patients, 26 were men and 7 were women; mean age at surgery was 68.6 years. Intraoperatively, posterior decompression and fusion was performed in 17 (51.5%) patients and fusion only was performed in 16 (48.5%). Mean operative time was 202.5 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 331.6 mL, and intraoperative blood loss was 1500 mL or greater in 2 (6.1%) patients. Median postoperative survival time determined using the Kaplan-Meier method was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.3-14.6). Regarding improvement of paralysis, neurological deficit was improved by at least 1 Frankel grade for 15 (45.5%) patients, and the number of ambulatory patients increased from 22 (66.7%) to 25 (75.8%). Postoperative adjuvant therapy included chemotherapy in 17 (51.5%) patients, radiotherapy in 21 (63.6%), and bone-modifying agent treatment in 25 (75.8%). The mean Barthel Index for activities of daily living improved from 53.5 preoperatively to 71.5 postoperatively. Discharge to home was possible for 23 (69.7%) patients. Activities of daily living for patients with metastatic spinal tumor were improved by minimally invasive palliative surgery with MISt using PPSs and postoperative adjuvant therapy. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e693-e698.].

Validation of the Spine Oncology Study Group-Outcomes Questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with metastatic spine disease

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

General questionnaires are often used to assess quality of life in patients with spine metastases, although a disease-specific survey did not exist until recently. The Spine Oncology Study Group has developed an outcomes questionnaire (SOSG-OQ) to measure quality of life in these patients. However, a scoring system was not developed, and the questionnaire was not validated in a group of patients, nor was it compared with other general quality of life questionnaires such as the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

PURPOSE

Our primary null hypothesis is that there is no association between the SOSG-OQ and EQ-5D. Our secondary null hypothesis is that there is no difference in coverage and internal consistency between the SOSG-OQ and EQ-5D. We also assess coverage, consistency, and validity of the domains within the SOSG-OQ.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A survey study from a tertiary care spine referral center was used for this study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample consisted of 82 patients with spine metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The SOSG-OQ (27 questions, 6 domains) score ranges from 0 to 80, with a higher score indicating worse quality of life. The EQ-5D (5 questions, 5 domains) index score ranges from 0 to 1, with a higher score indicating better quality of life.

METHODS

The association between the SOSG-OQ and EQ-5D index score was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation. Instrument coverage and precision were assessed by determining item completion rate, median score with range, and floor and ceiling effect. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach alpha. Multitrait analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to analyze properties of the individual domains in the SOSG-OQ.

RESULTS

The Spearman rank correlation between the SOSG-OQ and EQ-5D questionnaire was high (r=-0.83, p<.001). Internal consistency of the SOSG-OQ (0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94) was higher as compared to the internal consistency of the EQ-5D (0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.84; p<.001). The SOSG-OQ score had no floor or ceiling effect indicating good coverage (median 30, range 3-64), whereas the EQ-5D had a ceiling effect of 10% (median 0.71, range 0.05-1).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study proposes a scoring methodology-after reversing four inversely scored items-for the SOSG-OQ and shows that the questionnaire is a valid tool for the assessment of quality of life in patients with metastatic spine disease. The SOSG-OQ is superior to the EQ-5D in terms of coverage and internal consistency but consists of more questions.

Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Conventional Open Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: A Prospective Propensity Score-Matched Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of minimal invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional open surgery for spinal metastasis patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is lack of knowledge on whether MIS is comparable to conventional open surgery in treating spinal metastasis.

METHODS

Patients with spinal metastasis requiring surgery from January 2008 to December 2010 in two spine centers were recruited. The demographic, preoperative, operative, perioperative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed. Thirty MIS patients were matched with 30 open surgery patients using propensity score matching technique with a match tolerance of 0.02 based on the covariate age, tumor type, Tokuhashi score, and Tomita score.

RESULTS

Both groups had significant improvements in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), Karnofsky scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and neurological status postoperatively. However, the difference comparing the MIS and open surgery group was not statistically significant. MIS group had significantly longer instrumented segments (5.5 ± 3.1) compared with open group (3.8 ± 1.7). Open group had significantly longer decompressed segment (1.8 ± 0.8) than MIS group (1.0 ± 1.0). Open group had significantly more blood loss (2062.1 ± 1148.0 mL) compared with MIS group (1156.0 ± 572.3 mL). More patients in the open group (76.7%) needed blood transfusions (with higher average units of blood transfused) compared with MIS group (40.0%). Fluoroscopy time was significantly longer in MIS group (116.1 ± 63.3 s) compared with open group (69.9 ± 42.6 s). Open group required longer hospitalization (21.1 ± 10.8 days) compared with MIS group (11.0 ± 5.0 days).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that MIS resulted in comparable outcome to open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis but has the advantage of less blood loss, blood transfusions, and shorter hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications, Outcomes, and Points of Caution

STUDY DESIGN

A broad narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this article is to provide a technical review of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning and delivery, indications for treatment, outcomes, complications, and the challenges of response assessment. The surgical approach to spinal metastases is discussed with an overview of emerging minimally invasive techniques.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted on the techniques, outcomes, and developments in SBRT and surgery for spinal metastases.

RESULTS

The optimal management of patients with spinal metastases is complex and requires multidisciplinary assessment from an oncologic team that is familiar with the shifting paradigm as a consequence of evolving techniques in surgery and stereotactic radiation, as well as new developments in systemic agents. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and the epidural spinal cord compression (Bilsky) grading system are useful tools that facilitate communication among oncologic team members and can direct management by providing a baseline assessment of risks prior to therapy. The combined multimodality approach with "separation surgery" followed by postoperative spine SBRT achieves thecal sac decompression, improves tumor control, and avoids complications that may be associated with more extensive surgery.

CONCLUSION

Spine SBRT is a highly effective treatment that is capable of delivering ablative doses to the target while sparing the critical organs-at-risk, chiefly the critical neural tissues, within a short and manageable schedule. At the same time, surgery occupies an important role in select patients, particularly with the expanding availability and expertise in minimally invasive techniques. With rapid adoption of spine SBRT in centers outside of the academic setting, it is imperative for the practicing oncologist to understand the relevance and application of these evolving concepts.

Decompression surgery for spinal metastases: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on reported outcomes following decompression surgery for spinal metastases. METHODS The authors conducted MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science database searches for studies reporting clinical outcomes and complications associated with decompression surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Both retrospective and prospective studies were included. After meeting inclusion criteria, articles were categorized based on the following reported outcomes: survival, ambulation, surgical technique, neurological function, primary tumor histology, and miscellaneous outcomes. RESULTS Of the 4148 articles retrieved from databases, 36 met inclusion criteria. Of those included, 8 were prospective studies and 28 were retrospective studies. The year of publication ranged from 1992 to 2015. Study size ranged from 21 to 711 patients. Three studies found that good preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS ≥ 80%) was a significant predictor of survival. No study reported a significant effect of time-to-surgery following the onset of spinal cord compression symptoms on survival. Three studies reported improvement in neurological function following surgery. The most commonly cited complication was wound infection or dehiscence (22 studies). Eight studies reported that preoperative ambulatory or preoperative motor status was a significant predictor of postoperative ambulatory status. A wide variety of surgical techniques were reported: posterior decompression and stabilization, posterior decompression without stabilization, and posterior decompression with total or subtotal tumor resection. Although a wide range of functional scales were used to assess neurological outcomes, four studies used the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale to assess neurological function. Four studies reported the effects of radiation therapy and local disease control for spinal metastases. Two studies reported that the type of treatment was not significantly associated with the rate of local control. The most commonly reported primary tumor types included lung cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, renal cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer. CONCLUSIONS This study reports a systematic review of the literature on decompression surgery for spinal metastases. The results of this study can help educate surgeons on the previously published predictors of outcomes following decompression surgery for metastatic spinal disease. However, the authors also identify significant gaps in the literature and the need for future studies investigating the optimal practice with regard to decompression surgery for spinal metastases.

Minimally invasive "separation surgery" plus adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of spinal epidural metastases

Aim:

This study aimed to describe the application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in separation surgery combined with postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with symptomatic metastatic epidural spinal disease.

Methods:

Three techniques are described: (1) MIS posterior separation surgery alone, (2) MIS posterolateral separation surgery with percutaneous pedicle screw placement, and (3) MIS lateral corpectomy with percutaneous pedicle screw placement. Seven representative cases are presented in which the above techniques were applied and after which postoperative SBRT was performed.

Results:

The seven representative patients (3 male, 4 female) had a mean age of 54 years (range, 46–62 years). Two patients had a primary diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma and in one patient each a diagnosis of breast, renal, lung adenocarcinoma, melanoma, and urothelial squamous cell carcinoma as their primary tumor. All patients had additional multiorgan disease apart from the metastatic spine involvement. Three patients underwent operations in the lumbar spine, two in the thoracic spine, and one in each of the thoraco-lumbar and lumbo-sacral spine. The average operating time was 149 ± 60.3 min (range, 90–240 min). The mean estimated blood loss was 188.8 cc. The mean length of stay in the hospital was 4 days (range, 3–7 days). There were no surgical complications. All patients received postoperative SBRT (typically 24 Gy in 3 fractions) at a mean of 43.2 days after surgery (range, 30–83).

Conclusions:

Early reports such as this suggest that MIS techniques can be successfully and safely applied in accomplishing “separation surgery” with adjuvant SBRT in the management of metastatic spinal disease. The potential advantages conferred by MIS techniques such as shortened hospital stay, decreased blood loss, reduced perioperative complications, and earlier initiation of adjuvant radiation are highly desirable in the treatment of this challenging patient population.

Evaluation of health-related quality of life and its main influencing factors in a Polish population of patients with bone metastases

PURPOSE

Regardless of cancer type, the skeleton is one of the most common sites for cancer spread. Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) can be considered a primary endpoint in clinical trials concerning cancer patients with palliative disease. The proper measurement of this endpoint requires valid and reliable instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQoL and its main influencing factors using validated EORTC tools - the QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-BM22 in Polish population of patients with skeletal metastases.

METHODS

Patients with bone metastases and histologically confirmed malignancy were qualified for the study. They filled out a personal questionnaire, the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its supplementary module QLQ-BM22. The influence of numerous socio-clinical factors such as age, gender, working status, level of education, performance status, primary location, and previous treatment received was assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and ten patients (65 women) were enrolled into this study (mean age ±SD; 57.8±13.8). The most significant HRQoL issues were fatigue (59.29/100); pain (56.97/100) and insomnia (56.36/100). Men coped worse with pain (p=0.013), fatigue (p=0.050), nausea and vomiting (p=0.024) and financial difficulties (p=0.016) than women.

CONCLUSIONS

The main factors influencing HRQoL in Polish patients with bone metastases are fatigue, pain and insomnia, and as such should be a primary focus of patient-centered care in this group.

When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the techniques, indications, and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and separation surgery with subsequent radiosurgery in the treatment of patients with metastatic spine disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The utilization of MIS techniques in patients with spine metastases is a growing area within spinal oncology. Separation surgery represents a novel paradigm where radiosurgery provides long-term control after tumor is surgically separated from the neural elements.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were systematically queried for literature reporting MIS techniques or separation surgery in patients with metastatic spine disease. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Of the initial 983 articles found, 29 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five articles discussed MIS techniques and were grouped according to the primary objective: percutaneous stabilization (8), tubular retractors (4), mini-open approach (8), and thoracoscopy/endoscopy (5). The remaining 4 studies reported separation surgery. Indications were similar across all studies and included patients with instability, refractory pain, or neurologic compromise. Intraoperative variables, outcomes, and complications were similar in MIS studies compared to traditional approaches, and some MIS studies showed a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. Studies of mini-open techniques had the strongest evidence for superiority.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-quality evidence currently exists for MIS techniques and separation surgery in the treatment of metastatic spine disease. Given the early promising results, the next iteration of research should include higher-quality studies with sufficient power, and will be able to provide higher-level evidence on the outcomes of MIS approaches and separation surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESSC) is a frequent event in patients affected by solid tumor metastases. Current available approaches for MESCC include corticosteroids, radiotherapy and surgery. In the last few years, surgery has evolved from decompression by laminectomy alone, with the introduction of instrumentation systems by metalware (screws and hooks), and this has been associated to an improvement of clinical results compared to radiotherapy alone. Areas covered: In this narrative review, we outline the phases of management of cancer patients affected by MESSC, and discuss the timing of treatments, their impact on the Quality of life (QoL), and the relative benefits and harms of surgery and radiotherapy. Expert commentary: Despite the fact that clinical and surgical trials will be required to determine the most appropriate surgical technique and timing of surgery, we do expect a newer and more important role for radiotherapy in the management of MESCC patients in the next future. In particular, the implementation of radiotactic stereosurgery as adjuvant to decompressive surgery is expected to increase in the next few years, above all in those patients that can be candidate to the so called separation surgery.

The 100 most-cited articles in spinal oncology

OBJECTIVE The authors' objective was to identify the 100 most-cited research articles in the field of spinal oncology. METHODS The Thomson Reuters Web of Science service was queried for the years 1864-2015 without language restrictions. Articles were sorted in descending order of the number of times they were cited by other studies, and all titles and abstracts were screened to identify the research areas of the top 100 articles. Levels of evidence were assigned on the basis of the North American Spine Society criteria. RESULTS The authors identified the 100 most-cited articles in spinal oncology, which collectively had been cited 20,771 times at the time of this writing. The oldest article on this top 100 list had been published in 1931, and the most recent in 2008; the most prolific decade was the 1990s, with 34 articles on this list having been published during that period. There were 4 studies with Level I evidence, 3 with Level II evidence, 9 with Level III evidence, 70 with Level IV evidence, and 2 with Level V evidence; levels of evidence were not assigned to 12 studies because they were not on therapeutic, prognostic, or diagnostic topics. Thirty-one unique journals contributed to the 100 articles, with the Journal of Neurosurgery contributing most of the articles (n = 25). The specialties covered included neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, neurology, radiation oncology, and pathology. Sixty-seven articles reported clinical outcomes. The most common country of article origin was the United States (n = 62), followed by Canada (n = 8) and France (n = 7). The most common topics were spinal metastases (n = 35), intramedullary tumors (n = 18), chordoma (n = 17), intradural tumors (n = 7), vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty (n = 7), primary bone tumors (n = 6), and others (n = 10). One researcher had authored 6 studies on the top 100 list, and 7 authors had 3 studies each on this list. CONCLUSIONS This study identified the 100 most-cited research articles in the area of spinal oncology. The studies highlighted the multidisciplinary and multimodal nature of spinal tumor management. Recognition of historical articles may guide future spinal oncology research.