Technical advantages of an ultrasonic bone curette in spinal surgery

Recapping hemilaminoplasty for spinal surgical disorders using ultrasonic bone curette

Objective:

The authors present a novel method of the recapping hemilaminoplasty in a retrospective study of patients with spinal surgical disorders. This report describes the surgical technique and the results of hemilaminoplasty using an ultrasonic bone curette. The aim of this study was to examine the safety and effectiveness of the hemilaminoplasty technique with ultrasonic bone curette.

Methods:

Between April 2003 and July 2011, 33 patients with various spinal diseases (17 spinal tumors, 5 dural arteriovenous fistulas, 3 syringomyelia, 2 sacral perineural cysts, and 2 arachnoid cysts) were treated microsurgically by using an ultrasonic bone curette with scalpel blade and lightweight handpiece. The ultrasonic bone curette was used for division of lamina. After resection of the lesion, the excised lamina was replaced exactly in situ to its original anatomic position with a titanium plate and screw. Additional fusion technique was not required and the device was easy to handle. All patients were observed both neurologically and radiologically by dynamic plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan.

Results:

The operation was performed successfully and there were no instrument-related complications such as dural laceration, nerve root injury, and vessels injury. The mean number of resected and restored lamina was 1.7. CT confirmed primary bone fusion in all patients by 12 months after surgery.

Conclusion:

The ultrasonic bone curette is a useful instrument for recapping hemilaminoplasty in various spinal surgeries. This method allows anatomical reconstruction of the excised bone to preserve the posterior surrounding tissues.

Anterior vertebral artery decompression with an ultrasonic bone curette to treat bow hunter's syndrome

We report a patient with bow hunter's syndrome who was treated by anterior decompression of the vertebral artery (VA) using an ultrasonic bone curette (SONOPET). This 60-year-old man reported almost losing consciousness upon head rotation. Although the right VA appeared normal at the natural head position, upon left head rotation it became completely occluded at the transverse foramen of C2. We performed anterior decompression of the right VA at the axis using a high-speed drill and SONOPET. For anterior decompression of the VA in a deep and narrow operative field, we recommend use of SONOPET, which permits safe, easy bone dissection.

Use of a Novel Ultrasonic Surgical System for Decompression of the Facial Nerve

OBJECTIVE

The middle cranial fossa approach has been used to explore and decompress the facial nerve in patients with Bell's palsy and facial nerve tumors. Unfortunately, this approach is technically challenging and has a significant risk of injury to the facial nerve and to the cochleovestibular organs. One way to minimize the risk may be with the use of the Sonopet Omni ultrasonic aspirator (Synergetics Inc., St Charles, MO) instead of an otologic drill.

METHODS

In this prospective study using cadaveric temporal bones, a total of 17 temporal bone specimens were used. Seven cadaveric temporal bones were used (4-left, 3-right) for the initial feasibility study. At a second session, an additional 10 temporal bones (5-left, 5-right) underwent decompression of the facial nerve from the fundus of the internal auditory canal (IAC) to the geniculate ganglion (ie, labyrinthine segment). The average time to decompress the labyrinthine segment was measured. The temporal bones were then examined for evidence of any injury.

RESULTS

None of the 17 temporal bones showed any sign of injury to the superior semicircular canal or the cochlea. However, one specimen did have penetration of the IAC dura; another specimen did have penetration of the epineurium of the facial nerve. However, in neither case was there any evidence of injury to the facial nerve itself. At the first session, the average time for decompression of the labyrinthine segment was 10 minutes and 12 seconds. At the second session, the average time for decompression was 5 minutes and 0 seconds.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasonic surgical system may be used as an alternative to the surgical drill for decompression of the facial nerve. Although a learning curve does exist, as with any new surgical tool or device, our results indicate that the device can be used safely and in a reasonable amount of time. However, before proceeding with intraoperative use of this device for otologic and neurotologic procedures, familiarization is first recommended on cadaveric temporal bone specimens.

Surgical pitfalls of an ultrasonic bone curette (SONOPET) in spinal surgery

OBJECTIVE

We report our experience with the SONOPET ultrasonic bone curette.

METHODS

Between September 2001 and July 2005, 546 patients underwent microscopic spinal surgeries using a high-speed drill and the SONOPET instrument.

RESULTS

We encountered operative complications thought to be attributable to the use of the SONOPET in six patients (1.1%). There were five instances of dural puncture and one spinal cord injury. All dural tears occurred when the dura mater was aspirated into the tip of the SONOPET. None of the affected patients developed postoperative clinical complications because cerebrospinal fluid leakage was avoided by appropriate closure. We think that the transient spinal cord injury occurred because the vibration emanating from the SONOPET was transmitted directly to the spinal cord. Some patients experienced damage to the epidural venous plexus for reasons similar to those described above.

CONCLUSION

SONOPET facilitates the removal of bone in a narrow field, such as that encountered during keyhole surgery. It aids in the removal of the lateral edge of bone and is especially useful for expanding the foramen intervertebrale or opening the lateral recess. However, its use is not without risk. To prevent dural tears and venous plexus injury, we recommend that cotton be placed between the SONOPET and important structures. To avoid spinal cord injury, we suggest that the SONOPET be inserted horizontal with the dura mater to avoid the direct transmission of vibrations emanating from the instrument to the spinal cord. SONOPET is suitable for decompression on the lateral side, but not for decompression above the spinal cord.