MRGPRX2 and Adverse Drug Reactions

Agreement of a clinical scoring system with allergic anaphylaxis in suspected perioperative hypersensitivity reactions: prospective validation of a new tool

BACKGROUND

A clinical scoring system to estimate the likelihood that a reaction represents a perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction has been devised using a Delphi consensus process. Agreement of this clinical scoring system with the outcome of allergological assessment would allow the use of this tool in post-resuscitation and subsequent management of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction and potentially as a new standard reference for clinical investigations.

METHODS

We prospectively scored 301 cases of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction according to the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme. Classification of cases was by allergological workup based on immediate and delayed investigations. The discrimination and calibration of the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme was compared with results from an expert panel of allergologists, skin testing, mast cell tryptase ratios, and specific IgE assays, as was agreement by Cohen's kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme predicted cases of allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction with comparable discrimination to an expert panel, mast cell tryptase formula, and specific IgE assays in anaphylaxis to neuromuscular blocking drugs. Using a score threshold of 15 or greater to indicate allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reaction, the sensitivity was 88.9%, with a specificity of 79.4%. Prospectively, the Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme correctly classified a greater number of subjects than the expert panel and the optimal post hoc binary logistic regression model (86% vs 85% vs 84%), however it was inferior to skin testing.

CONCLUSION

The Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme predicts allergic perioperative immediate hypersensitivity using features of the acute syndrome. This approach could guide algorithms for the post-resuscitative management of suspected perioperative immediate hypersensitivity, and identify patients requiring drug provocation challenge.

β-arrestin-1 and β-arrestin-2 Restrain MRGPRX2-Triggered Degranulation and ERK1/2 Activation in Human Skin Mast Cells

As a novel receptor that efficiently elicits degranulation upon binding to one of its numerous ligands, MRGPRX2 has moved to the center of attention in mast cell (MC) research. Indeed, MRGPRX2 is believed to be a major component of pseudo-allergic reactions to drugs and of neuropeptide-elicited MC activation in skin diseases alike. MRGPRX2 signals via G proteins which organize downstream events ultimately leading to granule discharge. Skin MCs require both PI3K and ERK1/2 cascades for efficient exocytosis. β-arrestins act as opponents of G proteins and lead to signal termination with or without subsequent internalization. We recently demonstrated that ligand-induced internalization of MRGPRX2 requires the action of β-arrestin-1, but not of β-arrestin-2. Here, by using RNA interference, we find that both isoforms counter skin MC degranulation elicited by three MRGPRX2 agonists but not by FcεRI-aggregation. Analyzing whether this occurs through MRGPRX2 stabilization under β-arrestin attenuation, we find that reduction of β-arrestin-1 indeed leads to increased MRGPRX2 abundance, while this is not observed for β-arrestin-2. This led us speculate that β-arrestin-2 is involved in signal termination without cellular uptake of MRGPRX2. This was indeed found to be the case, whereby interference with β-arrestin-2 has an even stronger positive effect on ERK1/2 phosphorylation compared to β-arrestin-1 perturbation. Neither β-arrestin-1 nor β-arrestin-2 had an impact on AKT phosphorylation nor affected signaling via the canonical FcεRI-dependent route. We conclude that in skin MCs, β-arrestin-2 is chiefly involved in signal termination, whereas β-arrestin-1 exerts its effects by controlling MRGPRX2 abundance.

Nontryptase Urinary and Hematologic Biomarkers of Mast Cell Expansion and Mast Cell Activation: Status 2022

Quantitation of urinary metabolites of histamine, prostaglandin D₂, and leukotriene E₄ can fill the gap in our current efforts to improve diagnosis and management of symptomatic patients with systemic mastocytosis, and/or mast cell activation syndrome, In addition, patients symptomatic due to mast cell activation but who do not meet all the criteria for mast cell activation syndrome can have elevated baseline mediator metabolites. Serum tryptase levels have been the workhorse in diagnosing these disorders, but it has several drawbacks including the need to obtain acute and baseline samples, which require 2 visits to health care facilities and 2 venipunctures. Recently, increased baseline tryptase level has been reported in hereditary alpha tryptasemia, complicating diagnostic possibilities of an increased baseline tryptase level. Furthermore, no treatment can specifically be targeted at tryptase itself. In contrast, the finding of 1 or more elevated urinary levels of histamine, prostaglandin D₂, and/or leukotriene E₄ metabolites (1) greatly narrows diagnostic possibilities for causes of symptoms; (2) informs the practitioner what specific metabolic pathways are involved; and (3) targets the treatment in a specific, direct fashion. As a bonus, baseline spot/random urine samples can be obtained by the patients themselves and repeated at exactly the correct time when symptoms occur.

Spatiotemporal Patterns of Substance P-Bound MRGPRX2 Reveal a Novel Connection Between Macropinosome Resolution and Secretory Granule Regeneration in Mast Cells

MRGPRX2, the human member of the MAS-related G protein coupled receptors (Mrgprs), serves as the cellular target of human mast cells (MCs) for innate ligands, including neuropeptides and antimicrobial peptides. In addition, MRGPRX2 also functions as the receptor for multiple FDA-approved drugs. As such, MRGPRX2 is a mediator of MC responses in neurogenic inflammation, host defense and pseudoallergy. We analyzed the spatiotemporal patterns of MRGPRX2 following its binding of the neuropeptide substance P (SP). Herein, we show that MRGPRX2 internalizes via both endocytosis and macropinocytosis, followed by its distribution between a perinuclear region and the secretory granules (SGs). Further, we show that MRGPRX2-containing macropinosomes undergo resolution by a mechanism that involves dynamin and LC3, giving rise to the incorporation of both LC3 and MRGPRX2 into the SGs. SP then promotes the acidification of the LC3-associated SGs, presumably by stimulating their fusion with lysosomes. Taken together, our results reveal a unique mode of MRGPRX2 trafficking that complements endocytosis and involves macropinocytosis, autophagic machinery-assisted macropinosome resolution and receptor delivery to the SGs.

Synthetic imperatorin derivatives alleviate allergic reactions via mast cells

Anaphylaxis is a severe systemic allergic reaction that exhibits multiple clinical symptoms. The Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2) is recognized as a key cell receptor mediating allergic diseases and drug-induced anaphylactoid reactions. Thus, it has been a promising target for preventing and treating these reactions. Based on the potential activity of imperatorin and active structural feature of MRGPRX2, we first demonstrated that the synthetic imperatorin derivatives (IDs) could significantly inhibit MRGPRX2 agonist-induced degranulation and cytokine release in LAD2 cells, as well as alleviate local and systemic anaphylaxis in mice. The IC₅₀ value of the most promising compound is an order of magnitude lower than that of imperatorin. IDs were further identified to display anti-pseudo-allergic activity by binding MRGPRX2 with the tertiary nitrogen substructures, just liking the reported MRGPRX2-ligand. These results would propose evidence for discovery of agents for treating MCs-dependent allergic disorders.

MRGPRX2-Mediated Degranulation of Human Skin Mast Cells Requires the Operation of Gαi, Gαq, Ca++ Channels, ERK1/2 and PI3K—Interconnection between Early and Late Signaling

The recent discovery of MRGPRX2 explains mast cell (MC)-dependent symptoms independently of FcεRI-activation. Because of its novelty, signaling cascades triggered by MRGPRX2 are rudimentarily understood, especially in cutaneous MCs, by which MRGPRX2 is chiefly expressed. Here, MCs purified from human skin were used following preculture or ex vivo and stimulated by FcεRI-aggregation or MRGPRX2 agonists (compound 48/80, Substance P) in the presence/absence of inhibitors. Degranulation was assessed by β-hexosaminidase or histamine release. Phosphorylation events were studied by immunoblotting. As a G protein-coupled receptor, MRGPRX2 signals by activating G proteins; however, their nature has remained controversial. In skin MCs, G_αi and G_αq were required for degranulation, but G_αi was clearly more relevant. Ca++ channels were likewise crucial. Downstream, PI3K was essential for granule discharge initiated by MRGPRX2 or FcεRI. ERK1/2 and JNK were additional participants, especially in the allergic route. Addressing possible points of intersection between early and later events, pERK1/2 and pAKT were found to depend on G_αi, further highlighting its significance. G_αq and Ca++ channels made some contributions to the phosphorylation of ERK. Ca++ differentially affected PI3K activation in FcεRI- vis-à-vis MRGPRX2-signaling, as channel inhibition increased pAKT only when triggered via FcεRI. Collectively, our study significantly extends our understanding of the molecular framework behind granule secretion from skin MCs.

Mas-Related G Protein–Coupled Receptor-X2 and Its Role in Non-immunoglobulin E–Mediated Drug Hypersensitivity

A diverse group of Food and Drug Administration-approved cationic drugs including antibiotics, neuromuscular blocking drugs, opioids, antidepressants, and radiocontrast media activate mast cells and cause hypersensitivity reactions by both an immunoglobulin E IgE-dependent and independent manner. The recent discovery that these drugs activate mast cells via the G protein-coupled receptor known as Mas-related GPCR-X2 (MRGPRX2) has represented a paradigm shift of how drug hypersensitivity reactions are viewed. This article provides an overview of the current status of the role of MRGPRX2 on non-IgE-mediated drug hypersensitivity. Potential risk factors and evaluation for suspected MRGPRX2-mediated drug reactions are also discussed.

Allergy, Anaphylaxis, and Nonallergic Hypersensitivity: IgE, Mast Cells, and Beyond

IgE-mediated type I hypersensitivity reactions have many reported beneficial functions in immune defense against parasites, venoms, toxins, etc. However, they are best known for their role in allergies, currently affecting almost one third of the population worldwide. IgE-mediated allergic diseases result from a maladaptive type 2 immune response that promotes the synthesis of IgE antibodies directed at a special class of antigens called allergens. IgE antibodies bind to type I high-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI) on mast cells and basophils, sensitizing them to get triggered in a subsequent encounter with the cognate allergen. This promotes the release of a large variety of inflammatory mediators including histamine responsible for the symptoms of immediate hypersensitivity. The development of type 2-driven allergies is dependent on a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors at barrier surfaces including the host microbiome that builds up during early life. While IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity reactions are undoubtedly at the origin of the majority of allergies, it has become clear that similar responses and symptoms can be triggered by other types of adaptive immune responses mediated via IgG or complement involving other immune cells and mediators. Likewise, various nonadaptive innate triggers via receptors expressed on mast cells have been found to either directly launch a hypersensitivity reaction and/or to amplify existing IgE-mediated responses. This review summarizes recent findings on both IgE-dependent and IgE-independent mechanisms in the development of allergic hypersensitivities and provides an update on the diagnosis of allergy.

L'anaphylaxie et les vaccins COVID-19

Les vaccins contre le COVID-19 sont une intervention essentielle pour contrôler la situation pandémique mondiale actuelle. Des réactions anaphylactiques ont été rapidement rapportées après les vaccins à ARN du SARS-CoV2. Ce risque est maintenant mesuré à 2,5-11/1000 000 dans le cadre des programmes de surveillance de la sécurité des vaccins et un seul cas a été documenté comme étant dû au polyéthylène glycol. Les suggestions pour son rôle sont indirectes. La vaccination contre le COVID-19 est en cours de déploiement et les programmes de surveillance sont essentiels pour observer les effets indésirables graves, tels que l'anaphylaxie. Il est important de restaurer la confiance dans la vaccination avec l'ARNm du COVID-19 et d'autres vaccins et les données actuelles confirment leur innocuité sans plus de mortalité que les vaccins précédents. L'anaphylaxie est une condition qui doit être reconnue immédiatement, être traitée par épinéphrine et qui n'est pas limitative et permet la revaccination de certains patients avec prémédication. Il est important de reconnaître les populations à risque telles que les femmes, les patients ayant des antécédents d'allergies et d'anaphylaxie et de reconnaître les rares patients atteints de maladies activant les mastocytes. L'anaphylaxie due au vaccin est extrêmement rare et les cas spécifiques doivent faire l'objet d'une investigation et d'une prise en charge individualisées, soulignant le rôle clé des allergologues dans les programmes de vaccination.

Action of substance P and PAMP(9-20) on different excitation sites of MRGPRX2 induces differences in mast cell activation

MRGPRX2 on mast cells (MCs) is the target that directly mediates MC activation through the activity of small molecular substances. Previous work has attempted to prove that substance P (SP) and PAMP(9-20) induce an MRGPRX2-mediated MC degranulation reaction. However, SP activates MRGPRX2-induced histamine release, which may lead to allergic airway inflammation, while PAMP(9-20)-induced MrgprB2 activation releases more tryptase and fewer monoamines. Due to the lack of direct available comparisons, the different types of sensitizing mediators released by the action of SP and PAMP(9-20) inducing pseudo-allergic reactions via MRGPRX2 are unclear. To investigate whether the action sites of excited MRGPRX2 are different for SP and PAMP(9-20), leading to different effects, the release of inflammatory mediators was measured using MC degranulation reactions and RNA-seq assay in vitro. Mice were treated to observe local inflammation and MC degranulation in vivo. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis was used to verify the excited sites of SP and PAMP(9-20). SP and PAMP(9-20) both activated MRGPRX2 and led MCs to release inflammatory mediators. Significantly different levels of histamine, tryptase, TNF-α, MCP-1, and other cytokines were released in vivo and in vitro. G165E, D184N, W243R, and H259Y were necessary for SP to activate MRGPRX2, while only D184N and W243R were important for PAMP(9-20). The downstream signaling pathways activated by SP and PAMP(9-20) also differed in the phosphorylation level of PKC. There were differences in the sites via which SP and PAMP(9-20) activate MRGPRX2 and also in the activated downstream signaling pathways, which led to the differences the activation of the pathways and effects of SP- and PAMP(9-20)-induced MRGPRX2 activation.