Targeting Endotypic Traits with Medications for the Pharmacological Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Review of the Current Literature

A New Wearable System for Home Sleep Apnea Testing, Screening, and Classification

We propose an unobtrusive, wearable, and wireless system for the pre-screening and follow-up in the domestic environment of specific sleep-related breathing disorders. This group of diseases manifests with episodes of apnea and hypopnea of central or obstructive origin, and it can be disabling, with several drawbacks that interfere in the daily patient life. The gold standard for their diagnosis and grading is polysomnography, which is a time-consuming, scarcely available test with many wired electrodes disseminated on the body, requiring hospitalization and long waiting times. It is limited by the night-by-night variability of sleep disorders, while inevitably causing sleep alteration and fragmentation itself. For these reasons, only a small percentage of patients achieve a definitive diagnosis and are followed-up. Our device integrates photoplethysmography, an accelerometer, a microcontroller, and a bluetooth transmission unit. It acquires data during the whole night and transmits to a PC for off-line processing. It is positioned on the nasal septum and detects apnea episodes using the modulation of the photoplethysmography signal during the breath. In those time intervals where the photoplethysmography is detecting an apnea, the accelerometer discriminates obstructive from central type thanks to its excellent sensitivity to thoraco-abdominal movements. Tests were performed on a hospitalized patient wearing our integrated system and the type III home sleep apnea testing recommended by The American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Results are encouraging: sensitivity and precision around 90% were achieved in detecting more than 500 apnea episodes. Least thoraco-abdominal movements and body position were successfully classified in lying down control subjects, paving the way toward apnea type classification.

Zolpidem increases sleep efficiency and the respiratory arousal threshold without changing sleep apnoea severity and pharyngeal muscle activity

KEY POINTS

A decreased respiratory arousal threshold is one of the main contributors to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathogenesis. Several recent studies have sought to find a drug capable of increasing the respiratory arousal threshold without impairing pharyngeal muscle activity to reduce OSA severity, with variable success. Here we show that zolpidem increases the respiratory arousal threshold by ∼15%, an effect size which was insufficient to systematically decrease OSA severity as measured by the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Unlike recent physiological findings that showed paradoxical increases in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during transient manipulations of airway pressure, zolpidem did not alter pharyngeal muscle responsiveness during natural sleep. It did, however, increase sleep efficiency without changing apnoea length, oxygen desaturation, next-day perceived sleepiness and alertness. These novel findings indicate that zolpidem was well tolerated and effective in promoting sleep in people with OSA, which may be therapeutically useful for people with OSA and comorbid insomnia.

ABSTRACT

A recent physiology study performed using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulations indicated that the hypnotic zolpidem increases the arousal threshold and genioglossus responsiveness in people with and without obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Thus, zolpidem may stabilise breathing and reduce OSA severity without CPAP. Accordingly, we sought to determine the effects of zolpidem on OSA severity, upper airway physiology and next-day sleepiness and alertness. Nineteen people with OSA with low-to-moderate arousal threshold received 10 mg zolpidem or placebo according to a double-blind, randomised, cross-over design. Participants completed two overnight in-laboratory polysomnographies (1-week washout), with an epiglottic catheter, intramuscular genioglossus electromyography, nasal mask and pneumotachograph to measure OSA severity, arousal threshold and upper airway muscle responsiveness. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were also assessed. Zolpidem did not change the apnoea-hypopnoea index versus placebo (40.6 ± 12.3 vs. 40.3 ± 16.4 events/h (means ± SD), p = 0.938) or nadir oxyhaemoglobin saturation (79.6 ± 6.6 vs. 79.7 ± 7.4%, p = 0.932), but was well tolerated. Zolpidem increased sleep efficiency by 9 ± 14% (83 ± 11 vs. 73 ± 17%, p = 0.010). Arousal threshold increased by 15 ± 5% with zolpidem throughout all sleep stages (p = 0.010), whereas genioglossus muscle responsiveness did not change. Next-morning sleepiness and alertness were not different between nights. In summary, a single night of 10 mg zolpidem is well tolerated and does not cause next-day impairment in alertness or sleepiness, or overnight hypoxaemia in OSA. However, despite increases in arousal threshold without any change in pharyngeal muscle responsiveness, zolpidem does not alter OSA severity. It does, however, increase sleep efficiency by ∼10%, which may be beneficial in people with OSA and insomnia.

Variations in loop gain and arousal threshold during NREM sleep are affected by time of day over a 24-hour period in participants with obstructive sleep apnea

We investigated whether time of day affects loop gain (LG) and the arousal threshold (AT) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Eleven men with obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index > 5 events/h) completed a constant-routine protocol that comprised 3-h sleep sessions in the evening [10 PM (1) to 1 AM], morning (6 AM to 9 AM), afternoon (2 PM to 5 PM), and subsequent evening [10 PM (2) to 1 AM]. During each sleep session LG and the AT were measured during NREM sleep with a model-based approach. Our results showed the presence of a rhythmicity in both LG (P < 0.0001) and the AT (P < 0.001) over a 24-h period. In addition, LG and the AT were greater in the morning compared with both evening sessions [6 AM vs. 10 PM (1) vs. 10 PM (2): LG (1 cycle/min): 0.71 ± 0.23 vs. 0.60 ± 0.22 (P = 0.01) vs. 0.56 ± 0.10 (P < 0.001), AT (fraction of eupneic breathing): 1.45 ± 0.47 vs. 1.28 ± 0.36 (P = 0.02) vs. 1.20 ± 0.18 (P = 0.001)]. No difference in LG and the AT existed between the evening sessions (LG: P = 0.27; AT: P = 0.24). LG was correlated to measures of the hypocapnic ventilatory response (i.e., a measure of chemoreflex sensitivity) (r = 0.72 and P = 0.045) and the critical closing pressure (i.e., a measure of airway collapsibility) (r = 0.77 and P = 0.02) that we previously published. We conclude that time of day, independent of hallmarks of sleep apnea, affects LG and the AT during NREM sleep. These modifications may contribute to increases in breathing instability in the morning compared with other periods throughout the day/night cycle in individuals with obstructive sleep apnea. In addition, efficaciousness of treatments for obstructive sleep apnea that target LG and the AT may be modified by a rhythmicity in these variables.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Loop gain and the arousal threshold during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep are greater in the morning compared with the afternoon and evening. Loop gain measures are correlated to chemoreflex sensitivity and the critical closing pressure measured during NREM sleep in the evening, morning, and afternoon. Breathing (in)stability and efficaciousness of treatments for obstructive sleep apnea may be modulated by a circadian rhythmicity in loop gain and the arousal threshold.

Global burden of sleep-disordered breathing and its implications

One-seventh of the world's adult population, or approximately one billion people, are estimated to have OSA. Over the past four decades, obesity, the main risk factor for OSA, has risen in striking proportion worldwide. In the past 5 years, the WHO estimates global obesity to affect almost two billion adults. A second major risk factor for OSA is advanced age. As the prevalence of the ageing population and obesity increases, the vulnerability towards having OSA increases. In addition to these traditional OSA risk factors, studies of the global population reveal select contributing features and phenotypes, including extreme phenotypes and symptom clusters that deserve further examination. Untreated OSA is associated with significant comorbidities and mortality. These represent a tremendous threat to the individual and global health. Beyond the personal toll, the economic costs of OSA are far-reaching, affecting the individual, family and society directly and indirectly, in terms of productivity and public safety. A better understanding of the pathophysiology, individual and ethnic similarities and differences is needed to better facilitate management of this chronic disease. In some countries, measures of the OSA disease burden are sparse. As the global burden of OSA and its associated comorbidities are projected to further increase, the infrastructure to diagnose and manage OSA will need to adapt. The use of novel approaches (electronic health records and artificial intelligence) to stratify risk, diagnose and affect treatment are necessary. Together, a unified multi-disciplinary, multi-organizational, global approach will be needed to manage this disease.