51
|
Pennarossa G, Arcuri S, De Iorio T, Gandolfi F, Brevini TAL. Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:E830. [PMID: 33467648 PMCID: PMC7830719 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Bi-dimensional culture systems have represented the most used method to study cell biology outside the body for over a century. Although they convey useful information, such systems may lose tissue-specific architecture, biomechanical effectors, and biochemical cues deriving from the native extracellular matrix, with significant alterations in several cellular functions and processes. Notably, the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) platforms that are able to re-create in vitro the structures of the native tissue, have overcome some of these issues, since they better mimic the in vivo milieu and reduce the gap between the cell culture ambient and the tissue environment. 3D culture systems are currently used in a broad range of studies, from cancer and stem cell biology, to drug testing and discovery. Here, we describe the mechanisms used by cells to perceive and respond to biomechanical cues and the main signaling pathways involved. We provide an overall perspective of the most recent 3D technologies. Given the breadth of the subject, we concentrate on the use of hydrogels, bioreactors, 3D printing and bioprinting, nanofiber-based scaffolds, and preparation of a decellularized bio-matrix. In addition, we report the possibility to combine the use of 3D cultures with functionalized nanoparticles to obtain highly predictive in vitro models for use in the nanomedicine field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Pennarossa
- Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.P.); (S.A.); (T.D.I.)
| | - Sharon Arcuri
- Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.P.); (S.A.); (T.D.I.)
| | - Teresina De Iorio
- Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.P.); (S.A.); (T.D.I.)
| | - Fulvio Gandolfi
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences—Production, Landscape, Agroenergy and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Tiziana A. L. Brevini
- Laboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy; (G.P.); (S.A.); (T.D.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Yakavets I, Francois A, Lamy L, Piffoux M, Gazeau F, Wilhelm C, Zorin V, Silva AKA, Bezdetnaya L. Effect of stroma on the behavior of temoporfin-loaded lipid nanovesicles inside the stroma-rich head and neck carcinoma spheroids. J Nanobiotechnology 2021; 19:3. [PMID: 33407564 PMCID: PMC7789590 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-020-00743-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the highly expected clinical application of nanoparticles (NPs), the translation of NPs from lab to the clinic has been relatively slow. Co-culture 3D spheroids account for the 3D arrangement of tumor cells and stromal components, e.g., cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and extracellular matrix, recapitulating microenvironment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In the present study, we investigated how the stroma-rich tumor microenvironment affects the uptake, penetration, and photodynamic efficiency of three lipid-based nanoformulations of approved in EU photosensitizer temoporfin (mTHPC): Foslip® (mTHPC in conventional liposomes), drug-in-cyclodextrin-in-liposomes (mTHPC-DCL) and extracellular vesicles (mTHPC-EVs). Results Collagen expression in co-culture stroma-rich 3D HNSCC spheroids correlates with the amount of CAFs (MeWo cells) in individual spheroid. The assessment of mTHPC loading demonstrated that Foslip®, mTHPC-DCL and mTHPC-EVs encapsulated 0.05 × 10− 15 g, 0.07 × 10− 15 g, and 1.3 × 10− 15 g of mTHPC per nanovesicle, respectively. The mid-penetration depth of mTHPC NPs in spheroids was 47.8 µm (Foslip®), 87.8 µm (mTHPC-DCL), and 49.7 µm (mTHPC-EVs), irrespective of the percentage of stromal components. The cellular uptake of Foslip® and mTHPC-DCL was significantly higher in stroma-rich co-culture spheroids and was increasing upon the addition of serum in the culture medium. Importantly, we observed no significant difference between PDT effect in monoculture and co-culture spheroids treated with lipid-based NPs. Overall, in all types of spheroids mTHPC-EVs demonstrated outstanding total cellular uptake and PDT efficiency comparable to other NPs. Conclusions The stromal microenvironment strongly affects the uptake of NPs, while the penetration and PDT efficacy are less sensitive to the presence of stromal components. mTHPC-EVs outperform other lipid nanovesicles due to the extremely high loading capacity. The results of the present study enlarge our understanding of how stroma components affect the delivery of NPs into the tumors. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya Yakavets
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, Campus Sciences, Boulevard des Aiguillette, 54506, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. .,Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. .,Laboratory of Biophysics and Biotechnology, Belarusian State University, 4 Nezavisimosti Avenue, 220030, Minsk, Belarus.
| | - Aurelie Francois
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, Campus Sciences, Boulevard des Aiguillette, 54506, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Laureline Lamy
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, Campus Sciences, Boulevard des Aiguillette, 54506, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Max Piffoux
- Laboratoire Matière et systèmes complexes, CNRS UMR 7057, Université de Paris, 75205, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Florence Gazeau
- Laboratoire Matière et systèmes complexes, CNRS UMR 7057, Université de Paris, 75205, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Claire Wilhelm
- Laboratoire Matière et systèmes complexes, CNRS UMR 7057, Université de Paris, 75205, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Vladimir Zorin
- Laboratory of Biophysics and Biotechnology, Belarusian State University, 4 Nezavisimosti Avenue, 220030, Minsk, Belarus
| | - Amanda K A Silva
- Laboratoire Matière et systèmes complexes, CNRS UMR 7057, Université de Paris, 75205, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Lina Bezdetnaya
- Centre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, Campus Sciences, Boulevard des Aiguillette, 54506, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. .,Research Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|