Increased rate of brain metastasis with trastuzumab therapy not associated with impaired survival

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in advanced breast cancer: a case for caution

PURPOSE

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has a well-recognized role in the treatment of leukemia and small-cell lung cancer. Clinical utility has yet to be determined for breast cancer, where an emerging group at high risk of brain metastasis has fuelled consideration of PCI.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In reviewing our experience with PCI as part of a complex protocol for advanced breast cancer, we present descriptive data on late central nervous system outcomes in those receiving PCI. After high-dose anthracycline-based induction chemotherapy, Stage IIIB/IV breast cancer responders underwent tandem autologous marrow transplantation. Those in continued remission were referred for PCI. Whole-brain radiotherapy was delivered by usual means, at 36 Gy in 20 fractions.

RESULTS

Twenty-four women, with median age 45 (28-61), were enrolled between 1995 and 1998. Disease was largely metastatic (79%), and 75% were previously exposed to chemotherapy or hormonotherapy. Ten patients received PCI, at a median of 13.4 (11.8-16.5) months from study entry. Six patients developed brain metastases, 2 despite PCI. Striking functional decline was documented in 3 patients (at 9 months, 4 years, and 5 years post-PCI), including one previously high-functioning woman requiring full care for posttreatment dementia.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a series of advanced breast cancer patients treated prophylactically with whole-brain radiotherapy following an aggressive chemotherapy regimen. Although the therapeutic benefit of PCI is not ascertainable here, we describe brain metastases occurring despite PCI and serious long-term neurobehavioral sequelae in PCI-treated patients. Any further investigation of PCI in high-risk breast cancer will need to be approached with caution.

New challenges and opportunities in the management of brain metastases in patients with ErbB2-positive metastatic breast cancer

The introduction of trastuzumab for the treatment of tumors that overexpress ErbB2 (also known as HER2) has contributed significantly to recent improvements in systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer. The advances in systemic therapy have highlighted an increasing prevalence of central nervous system involvement in patients with ErbB2-positive breast cancer and a consequent need for new treatment options for brain metastases. Just as ErbB2-targeted systemic therapy has given rise to this challenge, so too could targeted therapy represent an opportunity to meet it. This Review considers the potential for targeted therapy to facilitate effective management of brain metastases in patients with ErbB2-positive breast cancer, and discusses in particular the data currently available in this setting for lapatinib, an orally available small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ErbB1 and ErbB2.

Progress and problems in the application of focused ultrasound for blood-brain barrier disruption

Advances in neuroscience have resulted in the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic agents for potential use in the central nervous system (CNS). However, the ability to deliver the majority of these agents to the brain is limited by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a specialized structure of the blood vessel wall that hampers transport and diffusion from the blood to the brain. Many CNS disorders could be treated with drugs, enzymes, genes, or large-molecule biotechnological products such as recombinant proteins, if they could cross the BBB. This article reviews the problems of the BBB presence in treating the vast majority of CNS diseases and the efforts to circumvent the BBB through the design of new drugs and the development of more sophisticated delivery methods. Recent advances in the development of noninvasive, targeted drug delivery by MRI-guided ultrasound-induced BBB disruption are also summarized.

Trastuzumab treatment beyond brain progression in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although trastuzumab therapy improves survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer, 40% of patients develop brain metastasis (BM) even when extracranial disease is under control. We studied whether trastuzumab therapy beyond or after BM was beneficial to patients with BM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The effect of trastuzumab on survival after BM was analyzed in 78 HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Patients were grouped according to trastuzumab therapy; no treatment and treatment before and after BM were diagnosed.

RESULTS

Overall survival after the diagnosis of BM as well as time to progression (TTP) of intracranial tumors was prolonged in patients who received trastuzumab after BM was diagnosed. Conversely, BM occurred much later in patients who received trastuzumab before BM. In the multivariate Cox regression model, age at BM <50 years, disease-free interval >or=24 months, TTP of intracranial tumor >or=4.8 months, and trastuzumab treatment after BM were significantly associated with longer survival after the onset of BM.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab therapy after the onset of BM in HER2-positive breast cancer patients is associated with a significant survival benefit after BM diagnosis compared with patients who never received or completed trastuzumab before the BM diagnosis.

Chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: have new chemotherapic agents changed the clinical outcome?

Brain metastasis occurs in 15-40% of cancer patients and is present in approximately 10-16% of patients with metastatic breast disease. However, little is known about prognostic factors enabling the early identification of breast cancer patients at risk of CNS metastases. Therapy for brain metastases should be based on several parameters, such as the assessment of prognostic variables, the extent of neurological and systemic disease, and its chemo-sensitivity to previously administered chemotherapy treatments. In view of the known close correlation between metastatic and primary tumor chemosensitivity, the type of chemotherapy chosen should depend more on the tumor histology than on the cerebral distribution of the single drug. More recent drugs with a high impact on the clinical outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients, such as taxanes or trastuzumab, play only a limited role in the treatment of brain metastases.

Factors influencing the time to development of brain metastases in breast cancer

This retrospective study analyzed risk factors influencing the time to development of brain metastases with the aim to facilitate the definition of a high-risk population among breast cancer patients. One hundred seventy-four breast cancer patients with brain metastases, treated with whole brain radiotherapy, were evaluated. Statistical analysis included hormone receptor status, HER2/neu status, tumour grading, tumour stage, young age at the time of diagnosis, adjuvant systemic treatment, palliative systemic treatment, metastatic sites (if brain metastases were not the first site of recurrence), and immunotherapy with trastuzumab. Time to development of brain metastases was significantly prolonged by systemic palliative treatment (p< or =0.0001) whereas high tumour grading (p< or =0.04) and trastuzumab therapy (p< or =0.04) significantly shortened this time span. Patients with the brain as first metastatic site, age>35 (p< or =0.001) and stage III (p< or =0.018) at the time of diagnosis had a significantly shorter time to development for brain lesions. These factors should be further validated by a prospective trial to identify a high-risk population amongst breast cancer patients and enable the development of screening programs for early detection.

Central nervous system metastases in a cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab

BACKGROUND

Several analyses suggest an increase of brain metastases in HER2 over-expressing breast cancers treated with trastuzumab as compared to historical series of unselected patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in 78 patients with HER2 over-expressing breast cancer treated with trastuzumab between July 2000 and June 2006 at the Oncology Department of University Federico II in Naples. We also characterized and compared patients with and without CNS involvement.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 35.3 months (95%CI 26.3-44); median overall survival was 56 months (95%CIs 46-nr); 5 patients showed CNS involvement before trastuzumab therapy while 31 developed CNS metastases during trastuzumab treatment. The median overall survival after CNS metastases was 25.4 months (95%CIs 15.2-nr); patients with CNS lesions showed worse overall survival than patients without CNS lesions (39.1 vs. 75 months, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

CNS metastases are common events in patients with metastatic HER2 over-expressing breast cancer treated with trastuzumab; the impact on survival is detrimental even if survival after CNS metastases is longer than historical reports. Appropriate investigation of the role of CNS imaging screening and the prophylactic treatment strategies for CNS represents a priority research in this setting.

Central nervous system metastases in HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab: incidence, survival, and risk factors

BACKGROUND

A higher incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has recently been reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aims of this observational study were to evaluate the incidence of CNS metastases in HER-2-positive MBC patients, to define the outcome of patients with CNS metastases, and to identify the risk factors for CNS relapse.

RESULTS

Between April 1999 and June 2005 we treated 122 consecutive HER-2-positive MBC patients with chemotherapy and trastuzumab. At a median follow-up of 28 months from the occurrence of metastatic disease, 43 patients (35.2%) developed CNS metastases. The median time to death from the diagnosis of CNS metastases was 23.46 months. At multivariate analysis we found that only premenopausal status at diagnosis of breast cancer and visceral metastases as the dominant site at relapse were significantly associated with a higher risk for CNS metastases.

CONCLUSION

The CNS metastasis incidence is very high in HER-2-positive MBC, but the survival after CNS relapse in these patients is longer than in patients unselected for HER-2 status, because of the better control of extracranial disease obtained by trastuzumab. The identified risk factors for CNS relapse could allow us to select a subgroup of HER-2-positive MBC patients as candidates for active surveillance for CNS progression (by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) and/or as candidates for accrual in trials of prevention of CNS relapse.

Trastuzumab and gemcitabine as salvage therapy in heavily pre-treated patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

In Her2-postive metastatic breast carcinoma, first-line trastuzumab-based therapy is well established; many centres continue antibody treatment beyond disease progression. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and trastuzumab after earlier exposure to anthracyclines, docetaxel and/or vinorelbine, and trastuzumab.

METHODS

Twenty-nine consecutive patients were included as eligible. Patients received gemcitabine at a dose of 1,250 mg/m2 on day one and eight, every 21 days. Trastuzumab was administered in three-week cycles. Clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD > or = 6 months) was defined as primary endpoint.

RESULTS

As of July 2007, all patients are evaluable for toxicity, and 26 for response. Earlier therapies consisted of trastuzumab (100%), anthracyclines (100%), vinorelbine (96.6%), docetaxel (72.4%), and capecitabine (72.4%). 19.2% of patients experienced PR, and SD > or = 6 months was observed in a further 26.9%, resulting in a CBR of 46.2%. Time to progression was median 3 months, and overall survival 17 months. Neutropenia (20.7%), thrombocytopenia (13.8%), and nausea (3.4%) were the only treatment-related adverse events that occurred with grade 3 or 4 intensity. Four patients (13.8%) developed brain metastases while on therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While CBR was low when compared to trastuzumab-based first-line therapy, it is higher than what would be expected from gemcitabine monotherapy in a similar setting. Together with the favourable toxicity profile, this regimen appears to be a safe and potentially effective salvage therapy option in a heavily pre-treated population.

Risk factors for central nervous system metastasis in patients with metastatic breast cancer

AIMS

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and central nervous system (CNS) involvement have an impaired survival and quality of life. In this study, we investigated the risk factors for CNS metastasis among patients with MBC.

METHODS

The risk factors for development of CNS metastasis were analyzed in 154 patients with MBC. Expression of c-erbB-2, Ki-67, p53, and hormone receptors was examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast cancer tissue samples from the 154 patients. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for the analysis of overall survival (OS). Chi-square test was used for univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Median OS was significantly poorer for patients with CNS metastasis as compared with patients with no CNS metastasis (OS, 23 mo vs 30 mo, respectively;p = 0.03). Ki-67 and p53 overexpressions by IHC, and lung metastasis as the first site of relapse, were associated with a higher risk of developing CNS metastasis in the univariate analysis (p <or= 0.05). The presence of lung metastasis (odds ratio [OR]= 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-7.00,p = 0.02) and p53 overexpression (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 0.99-6.00,p = 0.05) were the two predictive factors associated with occurrence of CNS metastasis in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the presences of lung metastasis as the first site of relapse and p53 overexpression were predictive for the occurrence of CNS metastasis in patients with MBC. Life expectancy of patients with CNS metastasis is significantly shorter than those without CNS metastasis. These results may have clinical significance in counseling MBC patients with regard to their prognosis.

Brain metastases in breast cancer: prognostic factors and management

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the overall survival of patients with brain metastases due to breast cancer and to identify prognostic factors that affect clinical outcome.

METHODS

Of the 7,872 breast cancer patients histologically diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1990 and July 2006 at the Asan Medical Center, 198 patients with solitary or multiple brain metastases were included in this retrospective study. Central nervous system (CNS) lesions were diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with leptomeningeal or dural metastases without co-existent parenchymal metastatic lesions were excluded in this study. We reviewed the medical records and pathologic data of these 198 patients to characterize the clinical features and outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at the diagnosis of brain metastases was 45 years (range 26-78 years). Fifty-five patients (28%) had a single brain metastasis, whereas 143 (72%) had more than two metastases. A total of 157 (79.2%) patients received whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). A total of 7 (3.6%) patients underwent resection of solitary brain metastases, 22 (11%) patients underwent gamma-knife surgery, three patients underwent intrathecal chemotherapy (1.5%) and 9 (4.6%) patients received no treatment. The overall median survival time was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7-6.5 months) and 23.1% of the patients survived for more than 1 year. The median overall survival time was 5.4 months for patients treated with WBRT, 14.9 months for patients treated with surgery or gamma-knife surgery only, and 2.1 months for patients who received no treatment (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (relative risk (RR) = 0.704, 95% CI 0.482-1.028, P = 0.069), number of brain metastases (RR = 0.682, 95% CI 0.459-1.014, P = 0.058), treatment modalities (RR = 1.686, 95% CI 1.022-2.781, P = 0.041), and systemic chemotherapy after brain metastases (RR = 1.871, 95% CI 1.353-2.586, P < 0.001) were independent factors associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

Although survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases was generally short, the performance status, number of brain metastases, treatment modalities and systemic chemotherapy after brain metastases were significantly associated with survival. Patients with single-brain metastasis and good performance status deserve aggressive treatment. The characteristics of initial primary breast lesions did not affect survival after brain metastasis.

CNS complications of breast cancer: current and emerging treatment options

In general, the development of CNS metastases of breast cancer depends on several prognostic factors, including younger age and a negative hormone receptor status. Also, the presence of a breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) germline mutation and expression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/neu) proto-oncogene seem to contribute to an increased rate of development of CNS metastases. The choice of appropriate therapy for brain metastases also depends on prognostic factors, including the age of the patient, the Karnofsky performance score, the number of brain metastases and the presence of systemic disease. Surgery followed by whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is generally restricted to ambulant patients with a single brain metastasis without active extracranial disease. In patients who have two to four metastases, stereotactic focal radiotherapy (i.e. radiosurgery) with or without WBRT is usually indicated. In the remainder of patients, WBRT alone provides adequate palliation. Although breast carcinoma is sensitive to chemotherapy, the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases is still unclear. Objective responses after cyclophosphamide-based therapies were reported in studies performed in the 1980s. Subgroup analysis of data from a randomised study indicates that survival may improve if WBRT is combined with the radiosensitiser efaproxiral. Interestingly, the Her2/neu antibody trastuzumab, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier, produces systemic responses and enhanced survival, without a clear effect on brain metastases. Breast cancer constitutes the most common solid primary tumour leading to leptomeningeal disease. Clinical symptoms such as cranial nerve dysfunction or a cauda equina syndrome can be treated with local radiotherapy. A randomised study in patients with leptomeningeal disease secondary to breast cancer has revealed that intrathecal chemotherapy is associated with substantially more adverse effects than non-intrathecal treatment, without a clear benefit in terms of response or survival. Intramedullary metastasis is rare but often presents with a rapidly progressive myelopathy. Local radiotherapy may preserve neurological function. Epidural spinal cord metastasis occurs in approximately 4% of patients and can lead to paraplegia. A randomised study has shown that surgical intervention together with local radiotherapy is superior to local radiotherapy alone.

Brain metastases: the HER2 paradigm

Between 100,000 and 170,000 patients with cancer develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases each year in the U.S., of which approximately 20% carry a primary diagnosis of breast cancer. As a consequence of improvements in systemic therapy, which have allowed patients to live longer with advanced cancer, CNS metastases are emerging as an important sanctuary site, and the incidence may be increasing in patients with particular tumor subtypes. Unless there are improvements in the treatment of CNS disease, a growing proportion of patients may be at risk of experiencing both morbidity and mortality as a result of uncontrolled CNS progression, often at a time when their extra-CNS disease is apparently under control. This article reviews changes in the epidemiology and natural history of women with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer over the last decade and presents the therapeutic challenges and opportunities that have arisen in this setting. First, the apparent increase in CNS disease among women with HER2-positive breast cancer, relative to historical controls, is discussed, followed by consideration of potential causes of this observation. Next, the implications of CNS disease, in terms of prognosis and the potential development of preventive strategies are considered. Finally, new developments in systemic approaches to the treatment of CNS disease, including cytotoxic chemotherapy and targeted therapy, are explored.

Trastuzumab prolongs overall survival in patients with brain metastases from Her2 positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are frequently encountered in Her2 positive advanced breast cancer. It is still not clear, if trastuzumab treatment should be continued following their diagnosis. In this analysis we evaluated if trastuzumab was able to influence time to in-brain progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS). For this reason, we compared patients who continued on trastuzumab with a historical control group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen Her2 positive patients receiving whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases and continuing on trastuzumab were identified. As historical control group, thirty-six patients treated before 2002 were identified from a breast cancer database. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors were potentially able to significantly influence TTP and OS.

RESULTS

Median TTP was 6 months, range 1-33+ months. Median OS was 7 months, range 1-38 months. Seventeen patients received trastuzumab after WBRT. Factors associated with prolonged TTP were KPS (p = 0.001), and intensified local treatment (p = 0.004). A trend towards longer TTP was observed in patients treated with trastuzumab (p = 0.068). OS was significantly influenced by KPS (p < 0.001), and continued antibody therapy (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Two parameters were significantly associated with prolonged OS: KPS and trastuzumab. While there was a trend towards prolonged TTP in patients with trastuzumab treatment after WBRT, this did not reach statistical significance. It appears therefore reasonable to suggest continuation of antibody therapy in patients with good performance status despite disease spreading to the brain. Concerning activity of trastuzumab in brain metastases themselves, no final conclusion is possible.

Trastuzumab: a review of its use in the management of HER2-positive metastatic and early-stage breast cancer

Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a humanised monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which is associated with clinically aggressive disease and a poor prognosis. The addition of intravenous trastuzumab to first-line chemotherapy improved the time to disease progression, objective response rate, duration of response, and overall survival in randomised, multicentre trials in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. As such, trastuzumab has become the standard of care in this setting, despite its high acquisition cost and potential for cardiac events, and is licensed for use in combination with paclitaxel (Europe and the US) or docetaxel (Europe). In addition, trastuzumab monotherapy is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have previously received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Recent data from large phase III trials with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting revealed significant improvements in disease-free and overall survival. Thus, trastuzumab is also rapidly becoming a standard component of adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.

Intensified local treatment and systemic therapy significantly increase survival in patients with brain metastases from advanced breast cancer - a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases have evolved from a rare to a frequently encountered event in advanced breast cancer due to advances in palliative systemic treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All Patients treated at our centre from 1994 to 2004 with WBRT for brain metastases from breast cancer were included. We performed a multivariate analysis (Cox regression) to explore which factors are able to influence significantly cerebral time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (metastatic sites [visceral versus non-visceral], Karnofsky performance score [KPS], age, intensified local treatment [boost irradiation, neuro-surgical resection] further systemic treatment).

RESULTS

Overall 174 patients, median age 51 years, range 27-76 years, were included. Median TTP was 3 months (m), range 1-33+ m. Median overall survival was 7 m, range 1-44 m. Factors significantly influencing TTP were KPS (p = 0.002), intensified local treatment (p < 0.001), and palliative systemic treatment (p = 0.001). Factors significantly influencing survival were intensified local treatment (p = 0.004), metastatic sites (p = 0.008), KPS (p = 0.006), and palliative systemic treatment (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

As shown by the significant influence of metastatic sites, some patients die from their advanced systemic tumour situation before they would die from cerebral progression. In other individuals however, intensified local treatment and systemic treatment appear to influence cerebral time to progression and overall survival.

Incidence, pattern and timing of brain metastases among patients with advanced breast cancer treated with trastuzumab

We aim to investigate the incidence, patterns and timing of brain metastases in advanced breast cancer patients who have previously received trastuzumab. Eighty-seven patients who had received trastuzumab for advanced breast cancer from November 1999 to September 2003 at the Royal Marsden Hospital were assessed. With a median follow-up period of 11 months from commencing trastuzumab, 23 patients developed brain metastases (30% at 1 year; 95% CI 58-82%). Among 57 patients who had clinical benefits on trastuzumab, 12 (21%) patients developed first disease progression in brain with 75% of them had isolated CNS progression. Moreover, among patients who received trastuzumab as first line treatment, isolated brain metastases were the initial site of progression in 17% patients. Nearly all patients developed parenchymal brain disease. This study shows brain metastases are common phenomenon in HER2 positive advanced breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab and also may implicate the brain as a sanctuary site for early relapse in this patient cohort.

Brain metastases in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab-based therapies

INTRODUCTION

CNS metastases mean a great challenge. It has been suggested that the brain metastases incidence could be high in metastasic breast cancer patients receiving trastuzumab based-therapies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a descriptive analysis of our experience in this setting. 86 patients met the criteria (From Oct/99 to Oct/03).

RESULTS

CNS progression occurred in 17 patients (19.5%). Mean age of CNS progression disease patients was 45.4 years while mean age for all the patients was 50.5 years. Response rate for the entire group of patients was: OR 39.7%; CB (OR + SD) 69%. Response rate to trastuzumab based-therapy was OR 82.4% and CB 88.2 at the time of CNS progression. Median time from the start of trastuzumab therapy up to the CNS progression was 10 months. OS was 23.4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of CNS involvement is high in young metastasic breast cancer women responding to trastuzumab-based therapies. This may lead to prophylactic cranial irradiation strategies or to the early detection in asymptomatic patients to improve surgery or radiosurgery results in these patients.

Primary breast cancer phenotypes associated with propensity for central nervous system metastases

BACKGROUND

There is anecdotal evidence that the incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in breast cancer patients is increasing. It is unclear whether specific tumor biological properties or the use of systemic therapies influence this risk.

METHODS

Using a database of 10,782 patients, 2685 patients were identified who experienced recurrence distantly. Clinical and biological features were analyzed in 2 ways: (1) patients who ever had versus those who never had CNS metastases, and (2) CNS metastases as the first site of recurrence versus those who had other sites. Correlations of survival after CNS metastasis with clinical and biologic features were also analyzed.

RESULTS

In the ever versus never analysis, CNS metastases were significantly associated with younger age, premenopausal status, infiltrating ductal carcinoma histology (IDC), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) negativity, low Bcl-2, high S-phase, aneuploidy, and altered p53. Tumor size, lymph node status, and use of adjuvant systemic therapy played little role. HER-2 overexpression was not associated with an increased risk in these patients (none of whom were treated with trastuzumab) (P = .91). However, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression was associated with increased risk (P = .02). A multivariate analysis revealed ER negativity (odds ratio [OR] 2.8, P < .001), IDC histology (OR 2.5, P = .02), and young age (P < .001) as independent factors for CNS metastases. The clinical and biologic profiles of primary tumors with CNS metastases at first recurrence did not differ from those with CNS metastases after recurrence to other sites, except for HER-2 status. HER-2-positive tumors were not more likely to undergo recurrence initially in the CNS (P =.04). The median survival after CNS metastases was 5.5 months and HER-2-positive patients had a shorter survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger patients with hormone receptor-negative, highly proliferative, genomically unstable, and p53-altered tumors were at increased relative risk for CNS metastases. HER-2 expression and adjuvant systemic therapies did not increase this risk.

Isolated central nervous system metastases in patients with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer treated with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize the prevalence and predictors of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis among women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer receiving trastuzumab-based therapy.

METHODS

The frequency and time course of isolated CNS progression were characterized among women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, receiving chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab as first-line treatment for metastatic disease in two clinical trials. The first trial was a multicenter randomized phase III study of chemotherapy (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel) +/- trastuzumab, and the second was a multicenter phase II trial of vinorelbine + trastuzumab. All patients had measurable disease and were free of symptomatic CNS disease at initiation of study treatment.

RESULTS

Nearly 10% of patients receiving trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy developed isolated CNS metastases as first site of tumor progression. Progression in the CNS tended to be a later event than progression at other sites among women receiving trastuzumab-based therapy. Trastuzumab-based treatment did not substantially delay onset of CNS metastases as initial site of progression. Following diagnosis with primary breast cancer, tumors with HER2 gene amplification tend to be associated with greater risk of isolated CNS progression compared with those lacking gene amplification.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer are at risk for isolated CNS progression, reflecting improved peripheral tumor control and patient survival through use of trastuzumab-based therapy, and a relative lack of CNS activity with trastuzumab. Clinicians should be aware of this association. Better treatments for CNS recurrences are needed.

Central nervous system metastases in breast cancer patients administered trastuzumab

Amplification or over-expression of the HER2/neu receptor is present in 20-30% of invasive breast cancers and in 60% of intraductal breast carcinomas. Patients with HER2/neu gene aberrations have more aggressive disease, frequent disease recurrence and a shorter survival. Trastuzumab (herceptin) is a monoclonal antibody selectively directed against the HER2/neu receptor. The addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy in HER2/neu-positive advanced breast cancer patients has increased complete and partial response rates, and prolonged time to progression and overall survival. However, a relatively common failure site in patients administered trastuzumab is the central nervous system (CNS). CNS metastases in these patients seem to develop despite responses achieved in extracerebral sites. This pattern of failure has mainly been attributed to the lack of trastuzumab penetration to the CNS owing to the high molecular weight (145 kDa) of this molecule. Additionally, increased risk of CNS relapse may be associated with improved systemic control of extracerebral metastases and prolonged survival without brain protection (a sanctuary site). Finally, it was postulated that HER2/neu over-expression and/or amplification might predispose to brain metastases. The aim of this article is to discuss the pathophysiology of this phenomenon and its clinical implications.

Characteristics of patients with brain metastases receiving trastuzumab for HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer

The intention of this retrospective analysis was to describe the characteristics of patients with brain metastasis (BM) receiving trastuzumab for HER2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A specific focus was the relation of BM occurrence to remission status of visceral disease during trastuzumab treatment. Patients with MBC presenting between March 2000 and May 2004 were included in this retrospective analysis. HER2 overexpression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC; DAKO Hercep Test). Trastuzumab was applied at a loading dose of 4 mg/kg and a maintenance dose of 2 mg/kg. Among 136 HER2 overexpressing patients (DAKO score 3+), 42 patients with BM were identified during follow-up (30.9%). Negative hormone receptor expression (estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR)) correlated with incidence of BM (42.8% vs. 23.4%; P=0.01). There was no correlation of the development of BM with regard to tumor grading and patient age. In patients who developed BM, the median interval between visceral and brain metastasis was 14 months (range 0-69 months). At the time BM was diagnosed, 14 out of 42 patients responded to trastuzumab-based treatment schedules (OR: 33.3%, 95% CI 18.5-48.2%). Median survival from diagnosis of BM was 13 months (range 0-60 months). The median overall survival calculated from first diagnosis of metastasis was not significantly shorter in patients with BM than in patients without BM (37 vs. 47 months; P=0.07 log rank). Trastuzumab is highly effective for the treatment of liver and lung metastasis in HER2 overexpressing patients, while it is apparently ineffective for treating or preventing BM. Since one third of HER2 overexpressing patients with MBC developed BM despite effective trastuzumab treatment, new treatment strategies and closer surveillance may be warranted for these patients.

Brain Metastases in Patients with Breast Cancer: New Horizons

Brain metastases occur in as many as one third of patients with disseminated breast cancer. In this article, we discuss various presentations of brain metastases from breast cancer and review evidence that supports different treatment options. Because no prospective, randomized, controlled studies, to our knowledge, have focused solely on patients with brain metastases from breast cancer, we will first review retrospective studies of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer. Randomized studies of patients with brain metastases caused by multiple primary cancers will also be examined, and the conclusions from these studies will be extrapolated to patients with breast cancer. Because brain metastases from breast cancer occur in a variety of different clinical settings, ranging from a single metastasis without extensive extracranial disease to multiple brain metastases with widespread extracranial disease, treatment approaches must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each patient. For different clinical scenarios, neurosurgical resection, radiosurgery, and/or whole-brain radiation therapy may be appropriate treatment options. For patients with brain metastases from breast cancer that overexpresses HER2/neu, trastuzumab could alter the natural history of the non-central nervous system (CNS) disease. Therefore, HER2 status could also influence the treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer. Given the prevalence of brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer in contemporary series, the rationale for clinical trials of CNS screening and prophylactic cranial irradiation will be discussed.

Therapeutic management of brain metastasis

This review focuses on the management of brain metastases. The four main modes of therapy are discussed: whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery, radiosurgery, and chemotherapy. Young patients with limited extracranial disease may benefit from surgical resection of a single brain metastasis, and from radiosurgery (or stereotactic radiotherapy) if two to four brain metastases are present. Whether WBRT after surgery or radiosurgery is beneficial is uncertain. Therefore, two approaches can be justified in patients with a good prognosis: WBRT after surgery or radiosurgery, or alternatively, observation with MRI follow-up after surgery or radiosurgery. A hyperfractionated radiation scheme is then to be preferred to limit late toxicity of WBRT. Patients with extensive extracranial tumour activity or impaired quality of life may benefit from radiosurgery (one to four brain metastases), or from shorter WBRT schedules. We propose a decision tree on the various ways to treat brain metastasis.

The pathogenesis and treatment of brain metastases: a comprehensive review

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and their incidence is increasing. Untreated brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor performance status. The role of surgery in the management of multiple brain metastases is still controversial. As more than 70% of patients have multiple metastases at the time of diagnosis, whole brain radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in most cases. Brain metastases are an ideal target for stereotactic radiosurgery, as they are better circumscribed than primary brain tumors. Currently, chemotherapy has a limited role in the treatment of most brain metastases. Several new therapies, with a good penetration through the blood brain barrier, such as temozolomide, have been used in brain metastases with different results depending on the histology of the primary tumor. A better understanding of the complex processes underlying the development of brain metastasis will enable us to develop more satisfactory targeted treatments.

The risk of central nervous system metastases after trastuzumab therapy in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab, which is a large monoclonal antibody that is efficacious in the treatment of patients with HER-2/neu-overexpressing, metastatic breast carcinoma, does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier and, thus, may allow the brain to become a sanctuary site for micrometastases. Few studies have compared the risk of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients treated with or without trastuzumab.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study that compared 264 patients who did not receive trastuzumab therapy with 79 patients who received trastuzumab therapy. The study was powered to detect an effect size of 0.3, which was deemed clinically significant to change future management.

RESULTS

CNS metastases developed in 48.1% of patients on trastuzumab-based therapy and in 46.6% of patients on nontrastuzumab-based therapy. The association between trastuzumab therapy and subsequent CNS metastases (either brain or leptomeningeal) was not significant, with a multivariate-adjusted odds ratio of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.88; P = 0.79). Similarly, there was no evidence of an association between trastuzumab and brain metastases alone (P = 0.67) or leptomeningeal metastases alone (P = 0.14). The median overall survival after the diagnosis of all CNS metastases was 26.3 months for patients who did not receive trastuzumab and 24.9 months for patients who received trastuzumab (P = 0.7). A multivariate logistic regression model found that patient age at diagnosis (P < 0.05), positive lymph node status at presentation (P < 0.01), and liver metastases (P < 0.01) were significant predictors of CNS metastases. Lung metastases showed a borderline significant P value (0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the impression of many oncologists, the results of this study did not support an association between trastuzumab therapy and an increased risk of CNS metastases.