51
|
HEALTH PROFESSIONALS' USER EXPERIENCE OF THE INTELLIGENT BED IN PATIENTS' HOMES. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2015; 31:256-63. [PMID: 26292761 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462315000380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intelligent bed is a medical bed with several home healthcare functions. It includes, among others, an "out of bed" detector, a moisture detector, and a catheter bag detector. The design purpose of the intelligent bed is to assist patients in their daily living, facilitate the work of clinical staff, and improves the quality of care. The aim of this sub-study of the iCare project was to explore how health professionals (HPs) experience and use the intelligent bed in patients' homes. METHODS The overall research design is inspired by case study methodology. A triangulation of data collection techniques has been used: log book, documentation study, participant observations (n = 45 hr), and qualitative interviews (n = 23). The data have been analyzed by means of Nvivo 9.0. FINDINGS We identified several themes: HP transformation from passive technology recipient to innovator; individualized care; work flow redesign; and sensor technology intruding on patient privacy. CONCLUSIONS It is suggested that functions of the intelligent bed can result in more individualized care, workflow redesign, and time savings for the health professionals in caring for elderly patients. However, the technology intruded on patients' privacy.
Collapse
|
52
|
Lyons BE, Austin D, Seelye A, Petersen J, Yeargers J, Riley T, Sharma N, Mattek N, Wild K, Dodge H, Kaye JA. Pervasive Computing Technologies to Continuously Assess Alzheimer's Disease Progression and Intervention Efficacy. Front Aging Neurosci 2015; 7:102. [PMID: 26113819 PMCID: PMC4462097 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, assessment of functional and cognitive status of individuals with dementia occurs in brief clinic visits during which time clinicians extract a snapshot of recent changes in individuals’ health. Conventionally, this is done using various clinical assessment tools applied at the point of care and relies on patients’ and caregivers’ ability to accurately recall daily activity and trends in personal health. These practices suffer from the infrequency and generally short durations of visits. Since 2004, researchers at the Oregon Center for Aging and Technology (ORCATECH) at the Oregon Health and Science University have been working on developing technologies to transform this model. ORCATECH researchers have developed a system of continuous in-home monitoring using pervasive computing technologies that make it possible to more accurately track activities and behaviors and measure relevant intra-individual changes. We have installed a system of strategically placed sensors in over 480 homes and have been collecting data for up to 8 years. Using this continuous in-home monitoring system, ORCATECH researchers have collected data on multiple behaviors such as gait and mobility, sleep and activity patterns, medication adherence, and computer use. Patterns of intra-individual variation detected in each of these areas are used to predict outcomes such as low mood, loneliness, and cognitive function. These methods have the potential to improve the quality of patient health data and in turn patient care especially related to cognitive decline. Furthermore, the continuous real-world nature of the data may improve the efficiency and ecological validity of clinical intervention studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bayard E Lyons
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Daniel Austin
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Adriana Seelye
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Johanna Petersen
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Jonathan Yeargers
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Thomas Riley
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Nicole Sharma
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Nora Mattek
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Katherine Wild
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Hiroko Dodge
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA
| | - Jeffrey A Kaye
- Oregon Center for Aging and Technology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA ; Neurology Service, Portland Veteran Affairs Medical Center , Portland, OR , USA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
The power(s) of observation: Theoretical perspectives on surveillance technologies and older people. AGEING & SOCIETY 2015; 35:512-530. [PMID: 29307944 DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x13000846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
There is a long history of surveillance of older adults in institutional settings and it is becoming an increasingly common feature of modern society. New surveillance technologies that include activity monitoring, and ubiquitous computing, which are described as ambient assisted living (AAL) are being developed to provide unobtrusive monitoring and support of activities of daily living and to extend the quality and length of time older people can live in their homes. However, concerns have been raised with how these kinds of technologies may affect user's privacy and autonomy. The objectives of this paper are 1) to describe the development of home-based surveillance technologies; 2) to examine how surveillance is being restructured with the use of this technology; and 3) to explore the potential outcomes associated with the adoption of AAL as a means of surveillance by drawing upon the theoretical work of Foucault and Goffman. The discussion suggests that future research needs to consider two key areas beyond the current discourse on technology and ageing, specifically: 1) how the new technology will encroach upon the private lived space of the individual, and 2) how it will affect formal and informal caring relationships. This is critical to ensure that the introduction of AAL does not contribute to the disempowerment of residents who receive this technology.
Collapse
|
54
|
Wu YH, Damnée S, Kerhervé H, Ware C, Rigaud AS. Bridging the digital divide in older adults: a study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies. Clin Interv Aging 2015; 10:193-200. [PMID: 25624752 PMCID: PMC4296914 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s72399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In a society where technology progresses at an exponential rate, older adults are often unaware of the existence of different kinds of information and communication technologies (ICTs). To bridge the gap, we launched a 2-year project, during which we conducted focus groups (FGs) with demonstrations of ICTs, allowing older adults to try them out and to share their opinions. This study aimed at investigating how participants perceived this kind of initiative and how they reacted to different kinds of ICTs. Patients and methods In total, 14 FGs were conducted with community-dwelling older adults, with a frequency of two FGs on the same topic once per trimester. Twenty-three older adults (four men and 19 women) attended at least one FG but only nearly half of them were regular attendants (ten participating in at least five sessions). Age of participants ranged from 63 years to 88 years, with a mean of 77.1 years. All of them had completed secondary education. The analyses of the data were performed according to inductive thematic analysis. Results Four overarching themes emerged from the analysis. The first concerned participants’ motivation for and assessment of the project. The second theme identified the underlying factors of the “digital divide” between the younger and the older generations. The third theme concerned the factors of technology adoption among older adults. The fourth one identified participants’ attitudes toward assistive ICTs, designed specifically for older adults (“gerontechnologies”). Discussions and conclusion This project encouraging older adults to be informed about different kinds of ICTs was positively rated. With regard to ICTs, participants perceived a digital divide. The underlying factors are generation/cohort effects, cognitive and physical decline related to aging, and negative attitudes toward technologies. However, more and more older adults adopt different kinds of ICTs in order to fit in with the society. Concerning assistive ICTs, they manifested a lack of perceived need and usefulness. Also, there was a negative image of end users of this kind of technologies. The so-called gerontechnologies specifically targeting older adults contain stigmatizing symbolism that might prevent them from adopting them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Huei Wu
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France ; Research Team 4468, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Souad Damnée
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France ; Research Team 4468, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Kerhervé
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France ; Research Team 4468, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Caitlin Ware
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France ; Centre de Recherche en Psychanalyse, Médicine et la Société, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Rigaud
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Broca Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France ; Research Team 4468, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83:624-35. [PMID: 24996581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2013] [Revised: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 06/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES With the worldwide population growing in age, information technology may help meet important needs to prepare and support patients and families for aging. We sought to explore the use and acceptance of information technology for health among the elderly by reviewing the existing literature. METHODS Review of literature using PubMed and Google Scholar, references from relevant papers, and consultation with experts. RESULTS Elderly people approach the Internet and health information technology differently than younger people, but have growing rates of adoption. Assistive technology, such as sensors or home monitors, may help 'aging in place', but these have not been thoroughly evaluated. Elders face many barriers in using technology for healthcare decision-making, including issues with familiarity, willingness to ask for help, trust of the technology, privacy, and design challenges. CONCLUSIONS Barriers must be addressed for these tools to be available to this growing population. Design, education, research, and policy all play roles in addressing these barriers to acceptance and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shira H Fischer
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1330 Beacon St., Suite 400, Brookline, MA 02446, United States; RAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 920, Boston, MA 02116, United States.
| | - Daniel David
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1330 Beacon St., Suite 400, Brookline, MA 02446, United States; Jonas Foundation Scholar, School of Nursing, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Bradley H Crotty
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1330 Beacon St., Suite 400, Brookline, MA 02446, United States
| | - Meghan Dierks
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1330 Beacon St., Suite 400, Brookline, MA 02446, United States
| | - Charles Safran
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 1330 Beacon St., Suite 400, Brookline, MA 02446, United States
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Claes V, Devriendt E, Tournoy J, Milisen K. Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 52:134-48. [PMID: 24951084 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2013] [Revised: 05/16/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Contactless monitoring is increasingly used to enhance qualitative and cost-effective care for older persons. Succesful integration of this technology in older peoples' daily lives, depends on their acceptance of these systems. The primary purpose was to explore attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards contactless monitoring of the activities of daily living. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A questionnaire was developed, validated and used in a cross-sectional survey with a convenience sample (n=245). The results were presented using descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to explore variables associated with willingness to install the technology. RESULTS Descriptive statistics indicate that adults of 60 years and older find contactless monitoring useful for various purposes (e.g. to remain living at home longer, safely and independently; for timely detection of emergency situations and gradually emerging health problems). They agree to share collected information with professional caregivers and own access to the data is valued. Respondents like to take part in diverse decisions about the monitoring (e.g. about the rooms in which it is installed, the type of sensors used and access of third parties to collected information). However, several concerns were expressed related to the functioning and financing of contactless monitoring. Bivariate analyses show that both socio-demographic factors (e.g. age, receiving professional home care) and attitudes and perceptions towards contactless monitoring (e.g. on its potential usefulness, on the availability of collected information, on the functional requirements and financial costs of the system and on the use of video cameras) can promote or impede acceptance of the technology. CONCLUSIONS This explorative study indicates that older adults are willing to incorporate contactless monitoring in later life or when their health declines. They agree to share collected information with professional caregivers and clearly demand for participation in decisions about the technology. Various concerns and requirements provide implications for clinical practice and future research. Thereby, technology developpers, policy makers and professional caregivers can promote the implementation of contactless monitoring in the care for older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Claes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Devriendt
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jos Tournoy
- Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Milisen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Services and Nursing Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Davis MM, Currey JM, Howk S, DeSordi MR, Boise L, Fagnan LJ, Vuckovic N. A qualitative study of rural primary care clinician views on remote monitoring technologies. J Rural Health 2013; 30:69-78. [PMID: 24383486 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Remote monitoring technologies (RMTs) may improve the quality of care, reduce access barriers, and help control medical costs. Despite the role of primary care clinicians as potential key users of RMTs, few studies explore their views. This study explores rural primary care clinician interest and the resources necessary to incorporate RMTs into routine practice. METHODS We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with rural primary care clinician members of the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from November 2011 to April 2012. Our multidisciplinary team used thematic analysis to identify emergent themes and a cross-case comparative analysis to explore variation by participant and practice characteristics. RESULTS Clinicians expressed interest in RMTs most relevant to their clinical practice, such as supporting chronic disease management, noting benefits to patients of all ages. They expressed concern about the quantity of data, patient motivation to utilize equipment, and potential changes to the patient-clinician encounter. Direct data transfer into the clinic's electronic health record (EHR), availability in multiple formats, and review by ancillary staff could facilitate implementation. Although participants acknowledged the potential system-level benefits of using RMTs, adoption would be difficult without payment reform. CONCLUSIONS Adoption of RMTs by rural primary care clinicians may be influenced by equipment purpose and functionality, implementation resources, and payment. Clinician and staff engagement will be critical to actualize RMT use in routine primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Kaye J, Mattek N, Dodge HH, Campbell I, Hayes T, Austin D, Hatt W, Wild K, Jimison H, Pavel M. Unobtrusive measurement of daily computer use to detect mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement 2013; 10:10-7. [PMID: 23688576 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2012] [Revised: 01/08/2013] [Accepted: 01/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild disturbances of higher order activities of daily living are present in people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). These deficits may be difficult to detect among those still living independently. Unobtrusive continuous assessment of a complex activity such as home computer use may detect mild functional changes and identify MCI. We sought to determine whether long-term changes in remotely monitored computer use differ in persons with MCI in comparison with cognitively intact volunteers. METHODS Participants enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study of unobtrusive in-home technologies to detect cognitive and motor decline in independently living seniors were assessed for computer use (number of days with use, mean daily use, and coefficient of variation of use) measured by remotely monitoring computer session start and end times. RESULTS More than 230,000 computer sessions from 113 computer users (mean age, 85 years; 38 with MCI) were acquired during a mean of 36 months. In mixed-effects models, there was no difference in computer use at baseline between MCI and intact participants controlling for age, sex, education, race, and computer experience. However, over time, between MCI and intact participants, there was a significant decrease in number of days with use (P = .01), mean daily use (∼1% greater decrease/month; P = .009), and an increase in day-to-day use variability (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Computer use change can be monitored unobtrusively and indicates individuals with MCI. With 79% of those 55 to 64 years old now online, this may be an ecologically valid and efficient approach to track subtle, clinically meaningful change with aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Kaye
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Neurology Service, Portland Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Nora Mattek
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Hiroko H Dodge
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ian Campbell
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tamara Hayes
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Daniel Austin
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - William Hatt
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Katherine Wild
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Holly Jimison
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Michael Pavel
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|