Endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: Advantages and hurdles

Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Excavation for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Cardia

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to estimate the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the cardia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 30 patients who were diagnosed with GISTs after ESE in the cardia at the Endoscopy Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (China) from June 2009 to 2015. We evaluated the operative and postoperative conditions and long-term follow-up of these patients.

RESULTS

The success rate and the complete resection rate were both 100%. The maximum diameter of the tumor ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 cm (2.2±0.2 cm). The operation time was 20 to 120 min (50±5 min). During ESE, bleeding occurred in all cases (100%) with a mean blood loss of 50 mL, and perforation in 6 (20%), including 2 full-thickness resections. GIST was confirmed by pathology in all cases. Follow-up included endoscopy at 1, 3, and 6 months, and at 1 year. At 1 month, ulcer was detected in 23 cases (76.67%), titanium clips remained in 17 cases (56.67%), and scar tissues were observed in the remainder. No recurrence was found with gastroscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The cardia is a unique anatomic location for GISTs, which often requires complex surgeries prone to complications. ESE for GISTs of the cardia is a challenging, but safe and effective procedure.

How best to manage gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare but most common nonepithelial tumor of gastrointestinal tract. They are often found incidentally on computed tomography and endoscopic investigations. Increasing knowledge of the pathogenesis of GISTs and the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors revolutionized the management of GISTs. The newer advanced endoscopic techniques have challenged the conventional surgery although the true efficacy and safety of endoscopic approach is not clear at this time. This review article focuses on pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of GISTs.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been used to remove submucosal tumors. However, with regard to the potential malignant behavior of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), whether ESD can be recommended for treatment is still controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ESD for removal of GISTs in the muscularis propria (MP) layer and to assess the possible risk factors for a gastric-wall defect (GWD).

METHODS

For 168 GISTs located in the MP layer from 168 consecutive patients, the baseline information, complications, and therapeutic outcomes were recorded. Subsequently, risk factors for a GWD were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most GISTs (106/168) were located in the fundus of the stomach. Tumor shapes in 154 patients (91.7%) were regular, and the median size of the tumor was 1.5 (range 0.5-6.0) cm. The en bloc resection rate was 100% and the median procedure time was 46.5 (33-181) min. A GWD was observed in 71 patients (42.3%) and delayed bleeding occurred in 2 patients (1.2%), and they were treated by clips. A total of 117 patients with a GIST were at very low risk, 37 patients were at low risk, and 14 patients were at mild risk. No local recurrences or distant metastases were observed during a median follow-up of 25 (6-67) months. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified the tumor type to be an independent risk factor for a GWD during ESD (odds ratio 29.82, 95% confidence interval 10.87-81.80, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

ESD is a safe and feasible method for gastric GISTs, especially for tumor types A and B. Endoscopic ultrasound can aid evaluation of the tumor type before ESD, which is an independent risk factor correlated with a GWD upon ESD.

Cytohistological and immunohistochemical characteristics of spindle-shaped mesenchymal neoplasms occurring in the gastrointestinal tract

The purpose of the present review is to analyze the cytohistological and immunohistochemical characteristics of spindle-shaped mesenchymal gastrointestinal neoplams (MGNs), a group of unusual neoplastic conditions with different biological behavior. These tumors exhibit clinical pictures strictly related to the site of origin and dimensions, even if they appear generally with an intramural localization. This latter point may suggest an useful application of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), mainly followed by the cell-block procedure (CBP) in the differential diagnostic approach. First of all, we discuss the most common entity of MGNs represented by gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), analyzing the morphologic characteristics and stressing the strength of immunohistochemical algorithm for diagnostic purposes. Successively, we have reported the less common group of spindle-shaped MGNs comprehensive of those arising elsewhere the soft tissues, such as leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas, schwannomas, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and intra-abdominal desmoid fibromatosis. Finally, very uncommon spindle-shaped MGNs, like clear cell, follicular dendritic cell, undifferentiated pleomorphic and radiation-induced sarcomas as well as spindle cell dedifferentiated liposarcomas, have been briefly mentioned.

Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the largest group of subepithelial tumors (SET) of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. They may show malignant behavior, in contrast to other SET. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is frequently used to characterize SET. With the introduction of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) into EUS (CE-EUS), distinct enhancement patterns can be detected. In the presented study, the characteristic features of CE-EUS in GIST are analyzed and compared with those of other SET.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients from four centers with SET of the upper and middle GI tract were included and received endoscopic or transcutaneous CEUS. The results were compared with EUS-guided tissue acquisition, forceps biopsy, or surgical resection.

RESULTS

Forty-two out of 62 (68%) patients had SET of the stomach, 17/62 (27%) of the small intestine, 2/62 (3%) of the esophagus, and 1/62 (2%) extraintestinal. Eighty-one percent underwent surgery. Leiomyoma was found in 5/62 (8%) and GIST in 57/62 patients (92%). Thirty-nine out of 57 (68%) patients had GIST lesions in the stomach, 17/57 (30%) had GIST of the small intestine, and 1/57 (2%) patients had extraintestinal GISTs. GIST size was 62.6 ± 42.1 (16-200) mm. Hyperenhancement had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 98%, 100%, 100%, 93%, and 98% for the diagnosis of GIST. Fifty out of 57 patients with GIST (88%) showed avascular areas in the center of the lesions.

CONCLUSION

CE-EUS and CEUS show hyperenhancement and avascular areas in a high percentage of GIST but not in leiomyoma. Thus, GIST and leiomyoma can be discriminated accurately.

Using endoscopy to minimize the extent of resection in the management of giant GISTs of the stomach

•

Giant gastric GISTs are usually managed with neo-adjuvant therapy followed by a partial or total gastrectomy.

•

We present a case of where intraoperative endoscopy was used to limit the extent of resection.

•

Simultaneous intra-operative endoscopy demonstrated a 2 mm fistula on the lesser curvature of the stomach. A stapler was used to encompass the mass and the fistulous opening.

•

A frozen-section showed clear margins and the endoscope was used to confirm luminal patency and perform an air-leak test.

•

Oncologic principles of minimal tissue handling and negative margins were observed.

Introduction

Presentation of case

Discussion

Conclusion

Endoscopic en bloc resection of an exophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor with suction excavation technique

Here, we report the first successful endoscopic resection of an exophytic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) using a novel perforation-free suction excavation technique. A 49-year-old woman presented for further management of a gastric subepithelial tumor on the lesser curvature of the lower body, originally detected via routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Abdominal computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound showed a 4-cm extraluminally protruding mass originating from the muscularis propria layer. The patient firmly refused surgical resection owing to potential cardiac problems, and informed consent was obtained for endoscopic removal. Careful dissection and suction of the tumor was repeated until successful extraction was achieved without serosal injury. We named this procedure the suction excavation technique. The tumor’s dimensions were 3.5 cm × 2.8 cm × 2.5 cm. The tumor was positive for C-KIT and CD34 by immunohistochemical staining. The mitotic count was 6/50 high-power fields. The patient was followed for 5 years without tumor recurrence. This case demonstrated the use of endoscopic resection of an exophytic GIST using the suction excavation technique as a potential therapy without surgical resection.

Hybrid NOTES: Combined Laparo-endoscopic Full-thickness Resection Techniques

Advances in laparoscopic surgery and therapeutic endoscopy have allowed these minimally destructive procedures to challenge conventional surgery. Because of its theoretic advantages and technical feasibility, laparoendoscopic full-thickness resection is considered to be the most appropriate option for subepithelial tumor removal. Furthermore, combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for treatment of neoplasia can be important maneuvers for gastric cancer resection without contamination of the peritoneal cavity if the sentinel lymph node concept is established. We are certain that the use of laparoendoscopic full-thickness resection will provide valuable experience that will allow operators to safely develop endoscopic full-thickness resection skills.

Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors treatment and value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pre-operation assess and post-operation follow-up: a prospective study of 224 cases in a single medical center

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diagram, diagnosis, and treatment with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) remain controversial, although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and ESD have been established in diagnosis and treatment of SMTs in decades, respectively. In this study, we have investigated prospectively the profile of upper gastrointestinal SMTs, assessed the effect and feasibility of ESD in upper gastrointestinal SMTs treatment, as well as value of EUS in pre-ESD diagnosis and post-ESD follow-up for gastrointestinal SMTs.

METHODS

The upper gastrointestinal SMTs patients detected with endoscopy were further checked by EUS, then received series ESD treatment, and fulfilled 3- and 12-month follow-up EUS detection between July 2011 and March 2015. The parameters of SMTs with EUS examination (size, original layer) and treatment with ESD (en bloc resection rate, procedure time, procedure-related complications) were investigated and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total number of 224 patients with upper gastrointestinal SMTs were enrolled, and 108 (48.2 %) were men. The mean age was 50.4 ± 12.0 years (range 19-77 years). In total, 92 (41.1 %), 14 (6.3 %), 61 (27.2 %), 22 (9.8 %), 25 (11.2 %), and 10 (4.5 %) SMTs were located in esophagus, cardiac, fundus, body and antrum of stomach, duodenum, respectively. Two hundred and eight (92.9 %) patients were successfully treated with an en bloc ESD, while other 16 patients (7.1 %) suffered ESD failure (5.3 %, 12 case) or severe complications (1.8 %, 4 cases). The mean procedure time of ESD was 47.4 ± 27.3 min (range 10-180 min). The mean size of the SMTs measured with ESD samples was 13.6 ± 9.5 mm (range 4-113 mm). In total, 87 (38.8 %), 23 (10.3 %), and 114 (50.9 %) tumors originated from muscularis mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria, respectively. The majority of SMTs were leiomyoma (109, 48.7 %) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) (77, 34.4 %), while other SMTs were confirmed as ectopic pancreas (21, 9.4 %), adenoid tumor (8, 3.6 %), lipoma (5, 2.2 %), neuroendocrine tumor (3, 1.3 %), and granulosa cell tumor (1, 0.4 %). The accuracy rate of EUS in pathological diagnosis or original layer was 82.6 % (185/224) or 74.6 % (167/224). Residual tumors were detected with EUS in 3 patients (1.3 %) in 3-month follow-up and no recurrence during 12-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The predominant SMTs in upper gastrointestinal tract were leiomyoma in esophageal tumors which originated from muscularis mucosae and GIST in stomach which originated from muscularis propria detected satisfactorily with EUS. This study showed that ESD was a safe and effective treatment for upper gastrointestinal SMTs.

Comparison of Endoscopic and Open Resection for Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends conservative follow-up for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) less than 2 cm. We have previously reported that the mitotic index of 22.22% of small gastric GISTs exceeded 5 per 50 high-power fields and recommended that all small gastric GISTs should be resected once diagnosed. The aim of the present study is to compare the safety and outcomes of endoscopic and open resection of small gastric GISTs. From May 2010 to March 2014, a total of 90 small gastric GIST patients were enrolled in the present study, including 40 patients who underwent surgical resection and 50 patients who underwent endoscopic resection. The clinicopathological characteristics, resection-related factors, and clinical outcomes were recorded and analyzed. The clinicopathological characteristics were comparable between the two groups except for tumor location and DOG-1 expression. Compared with the surgical resection group, the operation time was shorter (P = .000), blood loss was less (P = .000), pain intensity was lower (P < .05), duration of first flatus and defecation was shorter (P < .05), and medical cost of hospitalization was lower (P = .027) in the endoscopic resection group. The complications and postoperative hospital stay were comparable between the two groups. No in situ recurrence or liver metastasis was observed during follow-up. Endoscopic resection of small gastric GISTs is safe and feasible compared with surgical resection, although perforation could not be totally avoided during and after resection. The clinical outcome of endoscopic resection is also favorable.