Contemporary review of drug-induced pancreatitis: A different perspective

Causative Agents of Drug-Induced Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Assessment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze causes of drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) in Korea and factors associated with serious DIAP.

METHODS

Case records of DIAP voluntarily reported to the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System from 2004 to 2013 were reviewed. When a patient took 2 or more drugs, each drug was identified as a potential cause. The seriousness of each case was determined based on the International Conference on Harmonization E2D Guideline. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the seriousness of DIAP.

RESULTS

During the study period, 210 (0.05%) of 442,523 adverse event reports were (0.05%) DIAP. The most common causative medication of the DIAP cases with certain, probable/likely, and possible causality (n = 74) was L-asparaginase (n = 18), followed by azathioprine (n = 6), methylprednisolone (n = 6), and fenofibrate (n = 5). Serious events occurred in 43 cases (58%) with certain, probable/likely, and possible causality. They were significantly associated with the year of report (odds ratio, 0.572; P = 0.025) and the number of concurrently used medications (odds ratio, 2.659; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

L-Asparaginase is the most common cause of DIAP in Korea. Serious DIAP is more likely to occur in patients taking multiple medications.

Evaluation of Circulating MicroRNA Biomarkers in the Acute Pancreatic Injury Dog Model

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of four microRNAs (miRNAs) in an acute pancreatic injury dog model. Acute pancreatitis was induced by infusion of cerulein for 2 h (7.5 μg/kg/h). The levels of well-known miRNAs, microRNA-216a (miR-216a) and microRNA-375 (miR-375), and new candidates microRNA-551b (miR-551b), and microRNA-7 (miR-7), were measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h with serum amylase and lipase, and histopathological examination was performed. Among the four miRNAs, miR-216a and miR-375, and serum enzymes were significantly increased by cerulein treatment. The expression levels of miRNAs and serum enzymes peaked at 2–6 h with a similar pattern; however, the overall increases in miR-216a and miR-375 levels were much higher than those of the serum enzyme biomarkers. Increased levels of miR-216a and miR-375 were most highly correlated to the degree of individual histopathological injuries of the pancreas, and showed much greater dynamic response than serum enzyme biomarkers. Twenty-four-hour time-course analysis in this study revealed time-dependent changes of miRNA expression levels, from initial increase to decrease by predose level in acute pancreatitis. Our findings demonstrate that, in dogs, miR-216a and miR-375 have the potential to sensitively detect pancreatitis and reflect well the degree of pancreatic injury, whereas miR-551b and miR-7 do not.

Fenofibrate: A Nonlithogenic Means of Recurrent Drug-Induced Pancreatitis

Medications account for a small portion of the various etiologies of acute pancreatitis. Prompt identification of drugs as the inciting factor decreases disease recurrence and unnecessary invasive diagnostic intervention. This case is a report of fenofibrate-induced acute pancreatitis including a disease recurrence with continuation of fenofibrate which subsequently resolved after drug discontinuation. The patient underwent invasive diagnostic evaluation including endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Based on exclusion of other disease etiologies and a positive drug rechallenge, fenofibrate fits as a class 1A medication in the classification of drug-induced pancreatitis.

Prediabetes Directly Deteriorates into Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic Syndrome Triggered by Acute Pancreatitis: A Case Report Illustrating a "Chicken and Egg" Paradigm in Ketosis-Prone Diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic crises occur most often in patients with type 1 diabetes and occasionally in type 2 diabetes, especially under stressful conditions. However, a diabetic crisis occurring directly from prediabetes is an unusual phenomenon.

CASE REPORT

A 45-year-old woman presented with postprandial left upper quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. She had a past medical history of prediabetes with impaired fasting glucose and HbA1c 6.4%. On admission, routine laboratory tests showed high anion gap metabolic acidosis (pH 6.92), anion gap 41 mmol/L, blood glucose 931 mg/dL, beta-hydroxybutyrate 28 mmol/L, and calculated effective osmolarity 322 mOsm/kg; she was diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic syndrome (HHS), and DKA-related abdominal pain. Later, the patient was found to have elevated lipase and amylase, and diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. Since DKA can induce abdominal pain and nonspecific lipase elevation, both of which are characteristics of acute pancreatitis, while acute pancreatitis can conversely trigger DKA, there exists a "chicken and egg" paradigm. Therefore, the differential diagnosis is discussed.

CONCLUSION

It is important to differentiate DKA from concomitant causes of abdominal pain to avoid missing the underlying etiology, which can be the trigger for DKA. During diabetic crises, treating the underlying trigger is just as important as managing metabolic derangements in order to achieve favorable outcomes; meanwhile, managing acute pancreatitis-associated hyperglycemia can promote recovery. Additionally, diabetic crisis that directly evolves from prediabetes illustrates an atypical form of diabetes called ketosis-prone diabetes; we briefly discuss its clinical characteristics, classification, and follow-up.

Vedolizumab-induced acute pancreatitis: the first reported clinical case

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (DIAP) is a rare, but clinically significant diagnosis. Vedolizumab, an α₄β₇ integrin inhibitor, which was approved in 2015 for treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease, is a well-tolerated medication with a favourable safety profile and minimal serious adverse events in premarketing clinical trials. We present the first reported case of acute pancreatitis directly attributable to vedolizumab.

Fatal and non-fatal inflammatory injuries induced by different concentrations of L-arginine in Kunming rats

To establish animal models of fatal and non-fatal pancreatitis, we randomly divided 55 Kunming rats into three groups: Group A received three intraperitoneal injections of 8% L-arginine (L-arg); Group B received three intraperitoneal injections of 10% L-arg; and Group C (the control group) received three intraperitoneal injections of saline. After the third injection, biochemical indices and pathological changes in the pancreas and lungs were evaluated. In Group A, the rats experienced peak inflammatory edema at 48 h after the injections and exhibited the highest pathological score, but the biochemical indices showed no phase-related changes. In Group B, the rats exhibited significantly increased biochemical indices at 12 h after injection and experienced peak inflammatory edema at 24 h; the pathological score was also the highest, significantly different from the observations for Groups A and C ( P < 0.05), and the mortality rate was 64% over 72 h. Thus, it was inferred that L-arg could be used to establish pancreatitis models and that different concentrations lead to different lesions.

Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitor-Induced Acute Pancreatitis

Treatment of acute pancreatitis remains a challenge, with therapy focused on supportive care and treating the inciting etiology. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors have shown promising results treating acute pancreatitis in animal models, but they have not been evaluated in human trials yet. A 25-year-old woman presented with ulcerative colitis. She was unresponsive to immunomodulators and developed acute pancreatitis shortly after initiation of a TNFα inhibitor. Her symptoms subsided after discontinuation of the medication, but reemerged when a different TNFα inhibitor was introduced to control her ulcerative colitis. Other potential etiologies were investigated and clinically excluded by laboratory and imaging studies.

Medication as a Cause of Acute Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas characterized clinically by epigastric abdominal pain and elevated levels of pancreatic enzymes in the blood. Drug-induced pancreatitis has recently gained more attention and as a result, physicians are screening more frequently for medications as a cause of acute pancreatitis. CASE REPORT We report the case of a 74-year-old man with a significant past medical history for coronary artery disease, sleep apnea, and gastroesophageal reflux disease who presented with epigastric pain radiating to the back. After a careful history was taken, it was found the patient recently started furosemide; therefore, a diagnosis of furosemide-induced acute pancreatitis was made. CONCLUSIONS Furosemide and other medications should be strongly considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis induced by etoposide-lobaplatin combination chemotherapy used for the treatment of lung cancer: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Drug-induced pancreatitis (DIP) is a rare type of pancreatitis that is not usually observed in the clinical practice. It is generally difficult to distinguish from acute pancreatitis (AP) induced by other causes.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Here, we report a 62-year-old Chinese female patient with "small cell lung cancer" as the initial presentation. Because the patient could not bear the surgical treatment, the chemotherapy composed of lobaplatin and etoposide was performed. Three days later, the patient displayed sudden abdominal pain, distension, nausea, and vomiting without obvious inducements. Laboratory tests showed that the levels of serum and urine amylase were enhanced; abdominal computed tomography (CT) result showed the enlargement of the pancreas, peripancreatic effusion, and a rough edge, which suggested the diagnosis of AP. The patient had no history of biliary tract disease, alcoholism, binge overeating, hyperlipidemia, and hereditary pancreatitis.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was diagnosed with DIP.

INTERVENTIONS

The chemotherapy was stopped at once and we performed fluid resuscitation, pain alleviation, prophylactic antibiotics, and nutritional support, etc on the patient. Later, the patient's clinical symptoms were obviously relieved, and she recovered successfully.

OUTCOMES

The chemotherapy was continued, but later, the patient showed abdominal pain, distension, nausea, and vomiting again. The levels of serum amylase and urine amylase were enhanced again. Further imaging examination strongly indicated the recurrence of AP.

LESSONS

We should raise awareness of the clinicians regarding DIP, thereby enabling its timely diagnosis and accurate treatment, as well as promoting the rational and safe use of drugs.

Evaluation of miR-216a and miR-217 as Potential Biomarkers of Acute Exocrine Pancreatic Toxicity in Rats

Detecting and monitoring exocrine pancreatic damage during nonclinical and clinical testing is challenging because classical biomarkers amylase and lipase have limited sensitivity and specificity. Novel biomarkers for drug-induced pancreatic injury are needed to improve safety assessment and reduce late-stage attrition rates. In a series of studies, miR-216a and miR-217 were evaluated as potential biomarkers of acute exocrine pancreatic toxicity in rats. Our results revealed that miR-216a and miR-217 were almost exclusively expressed in rat pancreas and that circulating miR-216a and miR-217 were significantly increased in rats following administration of established exocrine pancreatic toxicants caerulein (CL) and 1-cyano-2-hydroxy-3-butene (CHB) as well as in rats administered a proprietary molecule known to primarily affect the exocrine pancreas. Conversely, neither microRNA was increased in rats administered a proprietary molecule known to cause a lesion at the pancreatic endocrine–exocrine interface (EEI) or in rats administered an established renal toxicant. Compared with amylase and lipase, increases in miR-216a and miR-217 were of greater magnitude, persisted longer, and/or correlated better with microscopic findings within the exocrine pancreas. Our findings demonstrate that in rats, miR-216a and miR-217 are sensitive and specific biomarkers of acute exocrine pancreatic toxicity that may add value to the measurement of classical pancreatic biomarkers.

Revisiting the reported signal of acute pancreatitis with rasburicase: an object lesson in pharmacovigilance

INTRODUCTION

There is an interest in methodologies to expeditiously detect credible signals of drug-induced pancreatitis. An example is the reported signal of pancreatitis with rasburicase emerging from a study [the 'index publication' (IP)] combining quantitative signal detection findings from a spontaneous reporting system (SRS) and electronic health records (EHRs). The signal was reportedly supported by a clinical review with a case series manuscript in progress. The reported signal is noteworthy, being initially classified as a false-positive finding for the chosen reference standard, but reclassified as a 'clinically supported' signal.

OBJECTIVE

This paper has dual objectives: to revisit the signal of rasburicase and acute pancreatitis and extend the original analysis via reexamination of its findings, in light of more contemporary data; and to motivate discussions on key issues in signal detection and evaluation, including recent findings from a major international pharmacovigilance research initiative.

METHODOLOGY

We used the same methodology as the IP, including the same disproportionality analysis software/dataset for calculating observed to expected reporting frequencies (O/Es), Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Preferred Term, and O/E metric/threshold combination defining a signal of disproportionate reporting. Baseline analysis results prompted supplementary analyses using alternative analytical choices. We performed a comprehensive literature search to identify additional published case reports of rasburicase and pancreatitis.

RESULTS

We could not replicate positive findings (e.g. a signal or statistic of disproportionate reporting) from the SRS data using the same algorithm, software, dataset and vendor specified in the IP. The reporting association was statistically highlighted in default and supplemental analysis when more sensitive forms of disproportionality analysis were used. Two of three reports in the FAERS database were assessed as likely duplicate reports. We did not identify any additional reports in the FAERS corresponding to the three cases identified in the IP using EHRs. We did not identify additional published reports of pancreatitis associated with rasburicase.

DISCUSSION

Our exercise stimulated interesting discussions of key points in signal detection and evaluation, including causality assessment, signal detection algorithm performance, pharmacovigilance terminology, duplicate reporting, mechanisms for communicating signals, the structure of the FAERs database, and recent results from a major international pharmacovigilance research initiative.

No association between losartan use and acute pancreatitis in hypertensive patients

Background and objective

Clinical evidence is scarce about the relationship between losartan use and acute pancreatitis. We therefore conducted a population-based case-control study using the database from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program to investigate this question.

Methods

The study consisted of 1449 hypertensive subjects aged 20-84 years with a first episode of acute pancreatitis during the period 2000-2011 as the case group and 2479 hypertensive subjects without acute pancreatitis as the control group. Both the case and control groups were matched for sex, age, comorbidities and index year of acute pancreatitis diagnosis. According to the history of losartan prescription before the date of diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, subjects who had never received a prescription for losartan were defined as 'never use of losartan', those whose last remaining losartan tablet was detected within 7 days before the date of diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were defined as 'current use of losartan' and those whose last remaining tablet of losartan was detected ≥8 days before the date of diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were defined as 'late use of losartan'. ORs and 95% CIs were measured to investigate the risk of acute pancreatitis associated with losartan use by the multivariable unconditional logistic regression model.

Results

After adjustment for potentially confounding factors, the adjusted OR of acute pancreatitis was 0.96 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.37) for subjects with current use of losartan compared with those with never use of losartan, but the difference was not statistically significant. For subjects with late use of losartan the adjusted OR of acute pancreatitis was 1.05 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.37), which also was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

No significant association can be detected between losartan use and acute pancreatitis in hypertensive patients. More research is required to determine the potential role of losartan in the risk of acute pancreatitis.

Azathioprine-induced Acute Pancreatitis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases--A Prospective Study on Incidence and Severity

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Azathioprine [AZA] is recommended for maintenance of steroid-free remission in inflammatory bowel disease IBD. The aim of this study has been to establish the incidence and severity of AZA-induced pancreatitis, an idiosyncratic and major side effect, and to identify specific risk factors.

METHODS

We studied 510 IBD patients [338 Crohn's disease, 157 ulcerative colitis, 15 indeterminate colitis] with initiation of AZA treatment in a prospective multicentre registry study. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in accordance with international guidelines.

RESULTS

AZA was continued by 324 [63.5%] and stopped by 186 [36.5%] patients. The most common cause of discontinuation was nausea [12.2%]. AZA-induced pancreatitis occurred in 37 patients [7.3%]. Of these: 43% were hospitalised with a median inpatient time period of 5 days; 10% had peripancreatic fluid collections; 24% had vomiting; and 14% had fever. No patient had to undergo nonsurgical or surgical interventions. Smoking was the strongest risk factor for AZA-induced acute pancreatitis [p < 0.0002] in univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

AZA-induced acute pancreatitis is a common adverse event in IBD patients, but in this study had a mild course in all patients. Smoking is the most important risk factor.

The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine is Frequent in Patients With Pancreatic Disorders

BACKGROUND

Herbal remedies and other complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) are used by 30% of the patients with liver and inflammatory bowel diseases. However, there are no data regarding CAM use in patients with pancreatic disorders, including potential pancreatotoxicity.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of CAM use in patients with pancreatic disorders and screen for pancreatotoxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey of consecutive outpatients seen at a Pancreas Center. Data were collected in a specific questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the prevalence and the patterns of CAM use. Characteristics associated with CAM use were analyzed by appropriate statistics.

RESULTS

Of 108 patients (52% male; mean age, 65±13 years), 47 (43.5%) used CAM. The use of CAM was more frequent among patients with previous acute pancreatitis (47%). Reported reasons for the use of CAM were to help standard therapies and for an overall better feeling. About 61% of the patients reported advantages with treatment. As compared with nonusers, CAM users were more often female (55% vs. 42%), with a higher school degree (43% vs. 36%), more frequently performing physical activity (51% vs. 41%), and reporting anxiety (45% vs. 31%). However, none of these differences were statistically significant. Three patients with previous acute pancreatitis reported the use of Serenoa repens that is potentially pancreatotoxic.

DISCUSSION

The rate of CAM use in patients with pancreatic disorders is similar to those reported for other digestive diseases. CAM use seems to be more frequent in women with a higher education level and a "healthier lifestyle." Patients might not be aware of the potential pancreatotoxicity of CAM, which should be carefully considered by physicians.

Mefenamic acid: A possible cause of drug-induced acute pancreatitis

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced acute pancreatitis (AP) is rare, but as there are no systematic data on it, the true incidence is not known.

CASE REPORT

This case report is a first description of two episodes of AP occurring after administration and subsequent re-administration of mefenamic acid to a young woman without comorbidities. Other common causes of AP could be ruled out. With both episodes, the latency of AP was less than 24 h after drug intake.

CONCLUSION

Mefenamic acid should be considered as a possible cause of drug-induced AP.

Acetaminophen Poisoning and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

The aim of this study was to assess whether acetaminophen poisoning is associated with a higher risk of acute pancreatitis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study by using the longitudinal population-based database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) program between 2000 and 2011. The acetaminophen cohort comprised patients aged ≥ 20 years with newly identified acetaminophen poisoning (N = 2958). The comparison cohort comprised randomly selected patients with no history of acetaminophen poisoning. The acetaminophen and comparison cohorts were frequency matched by age, sex, and index year (N = 11,832) at a 1:4 ratio. Each patient was followed up from the index date until the date an acute pancreatitis diagnosis was made, withdrawal from the NHI program, or December 31, 2011. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the effects of acetaminophen on the risk of acute pancreatitis.The risk of acute pancreatitis was 3.11-fold higher in the acetaminophen cohort than in the comparison cohort (11.2 vs 3.61 per 10,000 person-years), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.40 (95% confidence interval, 1.29-4.47). The incidence rate was considerably high in patients who were aged 35 to 49 years, men, those who had comorbidities, and within the first year of follow-up.Acetaminophen poisoning is associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. Additional prospective studies are necessary to verify how acetaminophen poisoning affects the risk of acute pancreatitis.

Canagliflozin-induced pancreatitis: a rare side effect of a new drug

Acute pancreatitis is most commonly attributed to gallstones, alcohol abuse, and metabolic disorders such as hyperlipidemia and hypercalcemia. Medications are an infrequent yet commonly overlooked etiology of pancreatitis. Although several drugs have been implicated, antidiabetic agents are a rare cause for drug-induced pancreatitis. Canagliflozin is a new drug in the class of SGLT-2 inhibitors used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Serious reported side effects include renal impairment, hyperkalemia, and hypotension. Pancreatitis as a result of canagliflozin, however, is exceedingly rare. Here we describe a case of a 33-year old female who presented with severe acute pancreatitis in the setting of recent initiation of canagliflozin. Given the timing of her presentation and after excluding all other possible etiologies, it was determined that canagliflozin was the likely source of her illness. This case highlights the importance of identifying drug-induced pancreatitis, especially in novel drugs, as it is commonly neglected in patients with multiple medical comorbidities and those taking numerous medications. Prompt identification of drug-induced pancreatitis can improve management as well as decrease morbidity and mortality in these individuals.